59 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The MESSy aerosol submodel MADE3 (v2.0b): description and a box model test J. Kaiser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1137-2014
2. A new radiation infrastructure for the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy, based on version 2.51) S. Dietmüller et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2209-2016
3. Earth System Chemistry integrated Modelling (ESCiMo) with the Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) version 2.51 P. Jöckel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1153-2016
4. Climate Impacts of Short-Lived Climate Forcers versus CO2 from Biodiesel: A Case of the EU on-Road Sector M. Lund et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/es505308g
5. Dehydration effects from contrails in a coupled contrail–climate model U. Schumann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11179-2015
6. Formation and radiative forcing of contrail cirrus B. Kärcher https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04068-0
7. Chemistry and the Linkages between Air Quality and Climate Change E. von Schneidemesser et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00089
8. Evaluation of the performance of four chemical transport models in predicting the aerosol chemical composition in Europe in 2005 M. Prank et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6041-2016
9. Continued global warming from aviation even under high-ambition mitigation scenarios B. Aamaas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101451
10. Emissions and External Environmental Costs from the Perspective of Differing Travel Purposes T. Hagedorn & G. Sieg https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247233
11. Impacts of ship emissions and sea-land breeze on urban air quality using chemical characterization, source contribution and dispersion model simulation of PM2.5 at Asian seaport Y. Tseng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123663
12. Global distribution and warming effect of brown carbon from shipping emissions Y. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44246-025-00212-w
13. Global aerosol modeling with MADE3 (v3.0) in EMAC (based on v2.53): model description and evaluation J. Kaiser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-541-2019
14. Mitigating aviation’s environmental impact through alternative fuels and cleaner engines R. Dischl et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aeg7503
15. The contribution of aviation NOx emissions to climate change: are we ignoring methodological flaws? V. Grewe et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab5dd7
16. Aviation soot interactions with natural cirrus clouds are unlikely to have a significant impact on global climate M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-18341-2025
17. Impacts of aviation fuel sulfur content on climate and human health Z. Kapadia et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10521-2016
18. Quantifying the climate impact of emissions from land-based transport in Germany J. Hendricks et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.06.003
19. The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 1: Land transport and shipping M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-633-2015
20. Impact on flight trajectory characteristics when avoiding the formation of persistent contrails for transatlantic flights F. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.09.017
21. Investigating daytime and night-time differences with the seasonal trend and sources of inorganic fine aerosols in Indo-Gangetic plain S. Chandra et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-018-1064-7
22. Large present-day and future climate forcing due to non-CO2 emissions from global transport J. Hendricks et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-026-01383-y
23. Climate benefits of proposed carbon dioxide mitigation strategies for international shipping and aviation C. Ivanovich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14949-2019
24. Mitigation of Non-CO2 Aviation’s Climate Impact by Changing Cruise Altitudes S. Matthes et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8020036
25. Evaluation of the Applicability of Synthetic Fuels and Their Life Cycle Analyses S. Richter et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17050981
26. The climate effects of ultrafine particles: uncertainties and future perspectives Y. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-026-2177-x
27. The contribution of global aviation to anthropogenic climate forcing for 2000 to 2018 D. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117834
28. The global impact of the transport sectors on the atmospheric aerosol and the resulting climate effects under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-835-2023
29. Sustainable aviation in the context of the Paris Agreement: A review of prospective scenarios and their technological mitigation levers S. Delbecq et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100920
30. Implementation of a comprehensive ice crystal formation parameterization for cirrus and mixed-phase clouds in the EMAC model (based on MESSy 2.53) S. Bacer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4021-2018
31. Characteristics of sub-10 nm particle emissions from in-use commercial aircraft observed at Narita International Airport N. Takegawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-1085-2021
32. Greenhouse gas and air pollutant emissions from power barges (powerships) E. Marais et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1VA00049G
33. The importance of contrail ice formation for mitigating the climate impact of aviation B. Kärcher https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024696
34. Understanding the role of contrails and contrail cirrus in climate change: a global perspective D. Singh et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-9219-2024
35. Solving aviation’s climate-action conundrum C. Voigt https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-025-02129-1
36. Review of the global models used within phase 1 of the Chemistry–Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) O. Morgenstern et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-639-2017
37. Fuel sulfur content can modulate contrail ice crystal numbers R. Dischl et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02951-5
38. Uncertainties in mitigating aviation non-CO2 emissions for climate and air quality using hydrocarbon fuels D. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3EA00091E
39. Quantifying the sectoral contribution of pollution transport from South Asia during summer and winter monsoon seasons in support of HTAP-2 experiment D. Surendran et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.011
40. Contrail formation on ambient aerosol particles for aircraft with hydrogen combustion: a box model trajectory study A. Bier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2319-2024
41. Simulated 2050 aviation radiative forcing from contrails and aerosols C. Chen & A. Gettelman https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7317-2016
42. Mitigating the contrail cirrus climate impact by reducing aircraft soot number emissions U. Burkhardt et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0046-4
43. ESMValTool (v1.0) – a community diagnostic and performance metrics tool for routine evaluation of Earth system models in CMIP V. Eyring et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1747-2016
44. Coupling aerosols to (cirrus) clouds in the global EMAC-MADE3 aerosol–climate model M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-1635-2020
45. Exploring the uncertainties in the aviation soot–cirrus effect M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17267-2021
46. Revisiting the contribution of land transport and shipping emissions to tropospheric ozone M. Mertens et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5567-2018
47. The global impact of the transport sectors on atmospheric aerosol in 2030 – Part 2: Aviation M. Righi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4481-2016
48. Mitigating the Climate Impact from Aviation: Achievements and Results of the DLR WeCare Project V. Grewe et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace4030034
49. Transport patterns of global aviation NOx and their short-term O3 radiative forcing – a machine learning approach J. Maruhashi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14253-2022
50. Alternative climate metrics to the Global Warming Potential are more suitable for assessing aviation non-CO2 effects L. Megill et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01423-6
51. Modelling mineral dust emissions and atmospheric dispersion with MADE3 in EMAC v2.54 C. Beer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-4287-2020
52. Innovative Box-Wing Aircraft: Emissions and Climate Change A. Tasca et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063282
53. Impact of Hybrid-Electric Aircraft on Contrail Coverage F. Yin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace7100147
54. Global atmospheric hydrogen chemistry and source-sink budget equilibrium simulation with the EMAC v2.55 model N. Surawski et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-911-2026
55. Impact of present aircraft NOx and aerosol emissions on atmospheric composition and climate: results from a model intercomparison Y. Cohen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5983-2026
56. Impact of present and future aircraft NOx and aerosol emissions on atmospheric composition and associated direct radiative forcing of climate E. Terrenoire et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11987-2022
57. An aerosol classification scheme for global simulations using the K-means machine learning method J. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-509-2022
58. Contrail formation within cirrus: ICON-LEM simulations of the impact of cirrus cloud properties on contrail formation P. Verma & U. Burkhardt https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8819-2022
59. A double-box model for aircraft exhaust plumes based on the MADE3 aerosol microphysics (MADE3 v4.0) M. Sharma et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-8485-2025