Articles | Volume 13, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5697-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5697-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
13 Jun 2013
Research article |
| 13 Jun 2013
Estimating regional methane surface fluxes: the relative importance of surface and GOSAT mole fraction measurements
A. Fraser
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
P. I. Palmer
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
L. Feng
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
H. Boesch
Earth Observation Science Group, Space Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
A. Cogan
Earth Observation Science Group, Space Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
R. Parker
Earth Observation Science Group, Space Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
E. J. Dlugokencky
US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Global Monitoring Division, Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
P. J. Fraser
Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
P. B. Krummel
Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
R. L. Langenfelds
Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
S. O'Doherty
School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
R. G. Prinn
Center for Global Change Science, Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
L. P. Steele
Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
M. van der Schoot
Centre for Australian Weather and Climate Research, CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Victoria, Australia
R. F. Weiss
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UCSD, La Jolla, California, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 8,920 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 03 Dec 2012)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5,310 | 3,346 | 264 | 8,920 | 275 | 249 |
- HTML: 5,310
- PDF: 3,346
- XML: 264
- Total: 8,920
- BibTeX: 275
- EndNote: 249
Total article views: 7,855 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 13 Jun 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,749 | 2,883 | 223 | 7,855 | 249 | 234 |
- HTML: 4,749
- PDF: 2,883
- XML: 223
- Total: 7,855
- BibTeX: 249
- EndNote: 234
Total article views: 1,065 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 03 Dec 2012)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 561 | 463 | 41 | 1,065 | 26 | 15 |
- HTML: 561
- PDF: 463
- XML: 41
- Total: 1,065
- BibTeX: 26
- EndNote: 15
Cited
70 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Inverse modeling of pan-Arctic methane emissions at high spatial resolution: what can we learn from assimilating satellite retrievals and using different process-based wetland and lake biogeochemical models? Z. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12649-2016
- Spatial variability and determinants of atmospheric methane concentrations in the metropolitan city of Shanghai, China M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116834
- Inverse modeling of GOSAT-retrieved ratios of total column CH4 and CO2 for 2009 and 2010 S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5043-2016
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
- Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1434-6
- A measurement-based verification framework for UK greenhouse gas emissions: an overview of the Greenhouse gAs Uk and Global Emissions (GAUGE) project P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11753-2018
- Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015
- Satellite-derived methane hotspot emission estimates using a fast data-driven method M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5751-2017
- Estimating regional fluxes of CO2 and CH4 using space-borne observations of XCH4: XCO2 A. Fraser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12883-2014
- CH4 concentrations over the Amazon from GOSAT consistent with in situ vertical profile data A. Webb et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025263
- Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database S. Schwietzke et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797
- History of chemically and radiatively important atmospheric gases from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) R. Prinn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-985-2018
- Interannual variability on methane emissions in monsoon Asia derived from GOSAT and surface observations F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd352
- Assessing 5 years of GOSAT Proxy XCH4 data and associated uncertainties R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4785-2015
- Validation of XCH4 derived from SWIR spectra of GOSAT TANSO-FTS with aircraft measurement data M. Inoue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2987-2014
- Extension of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) over the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: the Nicosia site in Cyprus C. Rousogenous et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-565-2026
- Atmospheric CH4 and CO2 enhancements and biomass burning emission ratios derived from satellite observations of the 2015 Indonesian fire plumes R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10111-2016
- Enhanced Methane Emissions during Amazonian Drought by Biomass Burning M. Saito et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166039
- Seamless mapping of long-term (2010–2020) daily global XCO2 and XCH4 from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2), and CAMS global greenhouse gas reanalysis (CAMS-EGG4) with a spatiotemporally self-supervised fusion method Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3597-2023
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: using GOSAT XCH4 data with weak-constraint four-dimensional variational data assimilation I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021
- How important is biomass burning in Canada to mercury contamination? A. Fraser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7263-2018
- Three decades of global methane sources and sinks S. Kirschke et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955
- Evaluating year-to-year anomalies in tropical wetland methane emissions using satellite CH4 observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.011
- Seasonal variations of atmospheric CH4 at Jingdezhen station in Central China: Understanding the regional transport and its correlation with CO2 and CO L. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104982
- Exploring constraints on a wetland methane emission ensemble (WetCHARTs) using GOSAT observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5669-2020
- Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO2 and XCH4 CRDP3 data set M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.027
- An increase in methane emissions from tropical Africa between 2010 and 2016 inferred from satellite data M. Lunt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14721-2019
- Seasonal variability of stratospheric methane: implications for constraining tropospheric methane budgets using total column observations K. Saad et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14003-2016
- Global height-resolved methane retrievals from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) on MetOp R. Siddans et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4135-2017
- Large and increasing methane emissions from eastern Amazonia derived from satellite data, 2010–2018 C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10643-2021
- River geochemistry, chemical weathering, and atmospheric CO2 consumption rates in the Virunga Volcanic Province (East Africa) C. Balagizi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005999
- Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions D. Jacob et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016
- Monitoring global tropospheric OH concentrations using satellite observations of atmospheric methane Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15959-2018
- On the use of satellite-derived CH4 : CO2 columns in a joint inversion of CH4 and CO2 fluxes S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8615-2015
- Global inverse modeling of CH4 sources and sinks: an overview of methods S. Houweling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-235-2017
- Spatial-temporal variation in XCH4 during 2009–2021 and its driving factors across the land of the Northern Hemisphere X. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106811
- Quantifying CH4 point source emissions with airborne remote sensing: first results from AVIRIS-4 S. Meier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-333-2026
- Evaluation of column-averaged methane in models and TCCON with a focus on the stratosphere A. Ostler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4843-2016
- The Methane Isotopologues by Solar Occultation (MISO) Nanosatellite Mission: Spectral Channel Optimization and Early Performance Analysis D. Weidmann et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101073
- Global methane emission estimates for 2000–2012 from CarbonTracker Europe-CH4 v1.0 A. Tsuruta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1261-2017
- Attributing 2019–2024 methane growth using TROPOMI satellite observations M. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adz9007
- Where to place methane monitoring sites in China to better assist carbon management X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00359-6
- Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021
- Comparison of the HadGEM2 climate-chemistry model against in situ and SCIAMACHY atmospheric methane data G. Hayman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13257-2014
- Role of regional wetland emissions in atmospheric methane variability J. McNorton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070649
- Recent methane surges reveal heightened emissions from tropical inundated areas X. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55266-y
- Contribution of regional sources to atmospheric methane over the Amazon Basin in 2010 and 2011 C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005300
- Using an Inverse Model to Reconcile Differences in Simulated and Observed Global Ethane Concentrations and Trends Between 2008 and 2014 S. Monks et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028112
- Retrieval of atmospheric CH4 vertical information from ground-based FTS near-infrared spectra M. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6125-2019
- Evaluation of CH4MODwetland and Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) used to estimate global CH4 emissions from natural wetlands T. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3769-2020
- Multistation intercomparison of column-averaged methane from NDACC and TCCON: impact of dynamical variability A. Ostler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4081-2014
- The global methane budget 2000–2012 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016
- A multi-year methane inversion using SCIAMACHY, accounting for systematic errors using TCCON measurements S. Houweling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3991-2014
- Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
- The development and evaluation of airborne in situ N2O and CH4 sampling using a quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer (QCLAS) J. Pitt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-63-2016
- Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116
- A new algorithm to generate a priori trace gas profiles for the GGG2020 retrieval algorithm J. Laughner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1121-2023
- Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
- The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106
- Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
- An integrated analysis of contemporary methane emissions and concentration trends over China using in situ and satellite observations and model simulations H. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1229-2022
- Large XCH4 anomaly in summer 2013 over northeast Asia observed by GOSAT M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9149-2016
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Inverse modelling of CH4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY M. Alexe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-113-2015
- A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0) A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017
- Rebalancing the global methane budget G. Allen https://doi.org/10.1038/538046a
- A decade of GOSAT Proxy satellite CH4 observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3383-2020
- The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
- China’s coal mine methane regulations have not curbed growing emissions S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07891-7
70 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Inverse modeling of pan-Arctic methane emissions at high spatial resolution: what can we learn from assimilating satellite retrievals and using different process-based wetland and lake biogeochemical models? Z. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12649-2016
- Spatial variability and determinants of atmospheric methane concentrations in the metropolitan city of Shanghai, China M. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116834
- Inverse modeling of GOSAT-retrieved ratios of total column CH4 and CO2 for 2009 and 2010 S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5043-2016
- Global distribution of methane emissions: a comparative inverse analysis of observations from the TROPOMI and GOSAT satellite instruments Z. Qu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14159-2021
- Decadal Methane Emission Trend Inferred from Proxy GOSAT XCH4 Retrievals: Impacts of Transport Model Spatial Resolution S. Zhu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1434-6
- A measurement-based verification framework for UK greenhouse gas emissions: an overview of the Greenhouse gAs Uk and Global Emissions (GAUGE) project P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11753-2018
- Estimating global and North American methane emissions with high spatial resolution using GOSAT satellite data A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7049-2015
- Satellite-derived methane hotspot emission estimates using a fast data-driven method M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5751-2017
- Estimating regional fluxes of CO2 and CH4 using space-borne observations of XCH4: XCO2 A. Fraser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12883-2014
- CH4 concentrations over the Amazon from GOSAT consistent with in situ vertical profile data A. Webb et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025263
- Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database S. Schwietzke et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797
- History of chemically and radiatively important atmospheric gases from the Advanced Global Atmospheric Gases Experiment (AGAGE) R. Prinn et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-985-2018
- Interannual variability on methane emissions in monsoon Asia derived from GOSAT and surface observations F. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd352
- Assessing 5 years of GOSAT Proxy XCH4 data and associated uncertainties R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4785-2015
- Validation of XCH4 derived from SWIR spectra of GOSAT TANSO-FTS with aircraft measurement data M. Inoue et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2987-2014
- Extension of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) over the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: the Nicosia site in Cyprus C. Rousogenous et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-565-2026
- Atmospheric CH4 and CO2 enhancements and biomass burning emission ratios derived from satellite observations of the 2015 Indonesian fire plumes R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10111-2016
- Enhanced Methane Emissions during Amazonian Drought by Biomass Burning M. Saito et al. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166039
- Seamless mapping of long-term (2010–2020) daily global XCO2 and XCH4 from the Greenhouse Gases Observing Satellite (GOSAT), Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2), and CAMS global greenhouse gas reanalysis (CAMS-EGG4) with a spatiotemporally self-supervised fusion method Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-3597-2023
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: using GOSAT XCH4 data with weak-constraint four-dimensional variational data assimilation I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-9545-2021
- How important is biomass burning in Canada to mercury contamination? A. Fraser et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7263-2018
- Three decades of global methane sources and sinks S. Kirschke et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955
- Evaluating year-to-year anomalies in tropical wetland methane emissions using satellite CH4 observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.02.011
- Seasonal variations of atmospheric CH4 at Jingdezhen station in Central China: Understanding the regional transport and its correlation with CO2 and CO L. Xia et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2020.104982
- Exploring constraints on a wetland methane emission ensemble (WetCHARTs) using GOSAT observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5669-2020
- Global satellite observations of column-averaged carbon dioxide and methane: The GHG-CCI XCO2 and XCH4 CRDP3 data set M. Buchwitz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.027
- An increase in methane emissions from tropical Africa between 2010 and 2016 inferred from satellite data M. Lunt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-14721-2019
- Seasonal variability of stratospheric methane: implications for constraining tropospheric methane budgets using total column observations K. Saad et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14003-2016
- Global height-resolved methane retrievals from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) on MetOp R. Siddans et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4135-2017
- Large and increasing methane emissions from eastern Amazonia derived from satellite data, 2010–2018 C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-10643-2021
- River geochemistry, chemical weathering, and atmospheric CO2 consumption rates in the Virunga Volcanic Province (East Africa) C. Balagizi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GC005999
- Satellite observations of atmospheric methane and their value for quantifying methane emissions D. Jacob et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14371-2016
- Monitoring global tropospheric OH concentrations using satellite observations of atmospheric methane Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15959-2018
- On the use of satellite-derived CH4 : CO2 columns in a joint inversion of CH4 and CO2 fluxes S. Pandey et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-8615-2015
- Global inverse modeling of CH4 sources and sinks: an overview of methods S. Houweling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-235-2017
- Spatial-temporal variation in XCH4 during 2009–2021 and its driving factors across the land of the Northern Hemisphere X. Cao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.106811
- Quantifying CH4 point source emissions with airborne remote sensing: first results from AVIRIS-4 S. Meier et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-333-2026
- Evaluation of column-averaged methane in models and TCCON with a focus on the stratosphere A. Ostler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4843-2016
- The Methane Isotopologues by Solar Occultation (MISO) Nanosatellite Mission: Spectral Channel Optimization and Early Performance Analysis D. Weidmann et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9101073
- Global methane emission estimates for 2000–2012 from CarbonTracker Europe-CH4 v1.0 A. Tsuruta et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1261-2017
- Attributing 2019–2024 methane growth using TROPOMI satellite observations M. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adz9007
- Where to place methane monitoring sites in China to better assist carbon management X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00359-6
- Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021
- Comparison of the HadGEM2 climate-chemistry model against in situ and SCIAMACHY atmospheric methane data G. Hayman et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13257-2014
- Role of regional wetland emissions in atmospheric methane variability J. McNorton et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL070649
- Recent methane surges reveal heightened emissions from tropical inundated areas X. Lin et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55266-y
- Contribution of regional sources to atmospheric methane over the Amazon Basin in 2010 and 2011 C. Wilson et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005300
- Using an Inverse Model to Reconcile Differences in Simulated and Observed Global Ethane Concentrations and Trends Between 2008 and 2014 S. Monks et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017JD028112
- Retrieval of atmospheric CH4 vertical information from ground-based FTS near-infrared spectra M. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6125-2019
- Evaluation of CH4MODwetland and Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (TEM) used to estimate global CH4 emissions from natural wetlands T. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3769-2020
- Multistation intercomparison of column-averaged methane from NDACC and TCCON: impact of dynamical variability A. Ostler et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4081-2014
- The global methane budget 2000–2012 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016
- A multi-year methane inversion using SCIAMACHY, accounting for systematic errors using TCCON measurements S. Houweling et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3991-2014
- Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
- The development and evaluation of airborne in situ N2O and CH4 sampling using a quantum cascade laser absorption spectrometer (QCLAS) J. Pitt et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-63-2016
- Interpreting contemporary trends in atmospheric methane A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1814297116
- A new algorithm to generate a priori trace gas profiles for the GGG2020 retrieval algorithm J. Laughner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-1121-2023
- Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales A. Turner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
- The added value of satellite observations of methane forunderstanding the contemporary methane budget P. Palmer et al. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2021.0106
- Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH4 ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations X. Lu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021
- Characterizing model errors in chemical transport modeling of methane: impact of model resolution in versions v9-02 of GEOS-Chem and v35j of its adjoint model I. Stanevich et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-3839-2020
- An integrated analysis of contemporary methane emissions and concentration trends over China using in situ and satellite observations and model simulations H. Tan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-1229-2022
- Large XCH4 anomaly in summer 2013 over northeast Asia observed by GOSAT M. Ishizawa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9149-2016
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Inverse modelling of CH4 emissions for 2010–2011 using different satellite retrieval products from GOSAT and SCIAMACHY M. Alexe et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-113-2015
- A global wetland methane emissions and uncertainty dataset for atmospheric chemical transport models (WetCHARTs version 1.0) A. Bloom et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2141-2017
- Rebalancing the global methane budget G. Allen https://doi.org/10.1038/538046a
- A decade of GOSAT Proxy satellite CH4 observations R. Parker et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3383-2020
- The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
- China’s coal mine methane regulations have not curbed growing emissions S. Miller et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07891-7
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 07 Jul 2026
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint