Articles | Volume 13, issue 10
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5103–5115, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5103-2013

Special issue: Integrated Land Ecosystem-Atmosphere Processes Study (iLEAPS)...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5103–5115, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5103-2013

Research article 17 May 2013

Research article | 17 May 2013

Evaluation of seasonal atmosphere–biosphere exchange estimations with TCCON measurements

J. Messerschmidt1, N. Parazoo2, D. Wunch1, N. M. Deutscher3, C. Roehl1, T. Warneke3, and P. O. Wennberg1 J. Messerschmidt et al.
  • 1California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
  • 2Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, USA
  • 3Institute of Environmental Physics, Bremen, Germany

Abstract. We evaluate three estimates of the atmosphere-biosphere exchange against total column CO2 observations from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON). Using the GEOS-Chem transport model, we produce forward simulations of atmospheric CO2 concentrations for the 2006–2010 time period using the Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (CASA), the Simple Biosphere (SiB) and the GBiome-BGC models. Large differences in the CO2 simulations result from the choice of the atmosphere-biosphere model. We evaluate the seasonal cycle phase, amplitude and shape of the simulations. The version of CASA currently used as the a priori model by the GEOS-Chem carbon cycle community poorly represents the season cycle in total column CO2. Consistent with earlier studies, enhancing the CO2 uptake in the boreal forest and shifting the onset of the growing season earlier significantly improve the simulated seasonal CO2 cycle using CASA estimates. The SiB model gives a better representation of the seasonal cycle dynamics. The difference in the seasonality of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) between these models is not the absolute gross primary productivity (GPP), but rather the differential phasing of ecosystem respiration (RE) with respect to GPP between these models.

Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint