55 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Modeling the global atmospheric transport and deposition of mercury to the Great Lakes M. Cohen et al. 10.12952/journal.elementa.000118
2. A 2-year record of atmospheric mercury species at a background Southern Hemisphere station on Amsterdam Island H. Angot et al. 10.5194/acp-14-11461-2014
3. Modeling of mercury deposition in India: evaluating emission inventories and anthropogenic impacts C. Malasani et al. 10.1039/D4EM00324A
4. Assessment of Global Mercury Deposition through Litterfall X. Wang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b06351
5. A diagnostic evaluation of modeled mercury wet depositions in Europe using atmospheric speciated high-resolution observations J. Bieser et al. 10.1007/s11356-014-2863-2
6. Mercury Physicochemical and Biogeochemical Transformation in the Atmosphere and at Atmospheric Interfaces: A Review and Future Directions P. Ariya et al. 10.1021/cr500667e
7. Origin of oxidized mercury in the summertime free troposphere over the southeastern US V. Shah et al. 10.5194/acp-16-1511-2016
8. Uncertainty Assessment of Gaseous Oxidized Mercury Measurements Collected by Atmospheric Mercury Network I. Cheng & L. Zhang 10.1021/acs.est.6b04926
9. Measuring and modeling mercury in the atmosphere: a critical review M. Gustin et al. 10.5194/acp-15-5697-2015
10. Overview of mercury dry deposition, litterfall, and throughfall studies L. Wright et al. 10.5194/acp-16-13399-2016
11. Evaluation of the Total Mercury Weight Exposure Distribution Using Tree Bark Analysis in an Artisanal and Small-Scale Gold Mining Area, North Gorontalo Regency, Gorontalo Province, Indonesia H. Prasetia et al. 10.3390/ijerph19010033
12. Impact of Athabasca oil sands operations on mercury levels in air and deposition A. Dastoor et al. 10.5194/acp-21-12783-2021
13. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part II: Insight from modeling A. Dastoor et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.112
14. Comparison of heterogeneous photolytic reduction of Hg(II) in the coal fly ashes and synthetic aerosols Y. Tong et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.11.015
15. Calibration Sources for Gaseous Oxidized Mercury: A Review of Source Design, Performance, and Operational Parameters M. Davis & J. Lu 10.1080/10408347.2022.2131373
16. Trend analysis from 1970 to 2008 and model evaluation of EDGARv4 global gridded anthropogenic mercury emissions M. Muntean et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.014
17. Subtropical subsidence and surface deposition of oxidized mercury produced in the free troposphere V. Shah & L. Jaeglé 10.5194/acp-17-8999-2017
18. Progress on Understanding Atmospheric Mercury Hampered by Uncertain Measurements D. Jaffe et al. 10.1021/es5026432
19. Multi-model study of mercury dispersion in the atmosphere: vertical and interhemispheric distribution of mercury species J. Bieser et al. 10.5194/acp-17-6925-2017
20. Multi-model study of mercury dispersion in the atmosphere: atmospheric processes and model evaluation O. Travnikov et al. 10.5194/acp-17-5271-2017
21. Uncertainties in the Mercury Mass Balance in a Coal-Based IGCC Power Plant (Puertollano, Spain) J. Esbr� Alba Martinez-Coronado et al. 10.32604/EE.2021.015781
22. The 3D biogeochemical marine mercury cycling model MERCY v2.0 – linking atmospheric Hg to methylmercury in fish J. Bieser et al. 10.5194/gmd-16-2649-2023
23. Assessment of Regional Mercury Deposition and Emission Outflow in Mainland China X. Wang et al. 10.1029/2018JD028350
24. Atmospheric mercury in the Canadian Arctic. Part I: A review of recent field measurements A. Steffen et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.109
25. Estimating Uncertainty in Global Mercury Emission Source and Deposition Receptor Relationships F. De Simone et al. 10.3390/atmos8120236
26. The GOS4M Knowledge Hub: A web-based effectiveness evaluation platform in support of the Minamata Convention on Mercury F. De Simone et al. 10.1016/j.envsci.2021.06.021
27. Fate of Springtime Atmospheric Reactive Mercury: Concentrations and Deposition at Zeppelin, Svalbard S. Osterwalder et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00299
28. Chemical cycling and deposition of atmospheric mercury in polar regions: review of recent measurements and comparison with models H. Angot et al. 10.5194/acp-16-10735-2016
29. Current and future levels of mercury atmospheric pollution on a global scale J. Pacyna et al. 10.5194/acp-16-12495-2016
30. An updated review of atmospheric mercury S. Lyman et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135575
31. A synthesis of research needs for improving the understanding of atmospheric mercury cycling L. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-17-9133-2017
32. Current understanding of the driving mechanisms for spatiotemporal variations of atmospheric speciated mercury: a review H. Mao et al. 10.5194/acp-16-12897-2016
33. Sensitivity model study of regional mercury dispersion in the atmosphere C. Gencarelli et al. 10.5194/acp-17-627-2017
34. Airborne observations of mercury emissions from the Chicago/Gary urban/industrial area during the 2013 NOMADSS campaign L. Gratz et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.09.051
35. Uncertainties in Atmospheric Mercury Modeling for Policy Evaluation S. Kwon & N. Selin 10.1007/s40726-016-0030-8
36. Mercury emissions of a coal-fired power plant in Germany A. Weigelt et al. 10.5194/acp-16-13653-2016
37. Isotopic fractionation of gaseous mercury in a large industrial city: Spatio-temporal variations and source apportionment I. Cho et al. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137162
38. Relative contributions of gaseous oxidized mercury and fine and coarse particle‐bound mercury to mercury wet deposition at nine monitoring sites in North America I. Cheng et al. 10.1002/2015JD023769
39. A Modeling Comparison of Mercury Deposition from Current Anthropogenic Mercury Emission Inventories F. Simone et al. 10.1021/acs.est.6b00691
40. Regional Air Quality Model Application of the Aqueous-Phase Photo Reduction of Atmospheric Oxidized Mercury by Dicarboxylic Acids J. Bash et al. 10.3390/atmos5010001
41. Atmospheric Modelling of Mercury in the Southern Hemisphere and Future Research Needs: A Review J. Leiva González et al. 10.3390/atmos13081226
42. Mercury Emission Ratios from Coal-Fired Power Plants in the Southeastern United States during NOMADSS J. Ambrose et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b01755
43. Source contribution analysis of mercury deposition using an enhanced CALPUFF-Hg in the central Pearl River Delta, China H. Xu et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.008
44. Evaluation of the KCl Denuder Method for Gaseous Oxidized Mercury using HgBr2 at an In-Service AMNet Site C. McClure et al. 10.1021/es502545k
45. Arctic atmospheric mercury: Sources and changes A. Dastoor et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156213
46. Vegetation uptake of mercury and impacts on global cycling J. Zhou et al. 10.1038/s43017-021-00146-y
47. Exploring macrophytes’ microbial populations dynamics to enhance bioremediation in constructed wetlands for industrial pollutants removal in sustainable wastewater treatment G. Ijoma et al. 10.1007/s13199-024-00981-9
48. Arctic Ocean: Is It a Sink or a Source of Atmospheric Mercury? A. Dastoor & D. Durnford 10.1021/es404473e
49. How important is biomass burning in Canada to mercury contamination? A. Fraser et al. 10.5194/acp-18-7263-2018
50. Development of methodology to generate, measure, and characterize the chemical composition of oxidized mercury nanoparticles A. Ghoshdastidar et al. 10.1007/s00216-019-02279-y
51. Use of a global model to understand speciated atmospheric mercury observations at five high-elevation sites P. Weiss-Penzias et al. 10.5194/acp-15-1161-2015
52. European and Mediterranean mercury modelling: Local and long-range contributions to the deposition flux C. Gencarelli et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.07.015
53. Evaluation of CMAQ Coupled With a State‐of‐the‐Art Mercury Chemical Mechanism (CMAQ‐newHg‐Br) Z. Ye et al. 10.1002/2017MS001161
54. Mercury speciation in a coal‐fired power plant plume: An aircraft‐based study of emissions from the 3640 MW Nanticoke Generating Station, Ontario, Canada D. Deeds et al. 10.1002/jgrd.50349
55. Using thermal analysis coupled to isotope dilution cold vapor ICP-MS in the quantification of atmospheric particulate phase mercury M. Lynam et al. 10.1039/c3ja50184a