Articles | Volume 12, issue 17
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8189–8203, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8189-2012
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8189–8203, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8189-2012

Research article 12 Sep 2012

Research article | 12 Sep 2012

Methanol from TES global observations: retrieval algorithm and seasonal and spatial variability

K. E. Cady-Pereira1, M. W. Shephard2, D. B. Millet3, M. Luo4, K. C. Wells3, Y. Xiao1, V. H. Payne4, and J. Worden4 K. E. Cady-Pereira et al.
  • 1Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc., Lexington, Massachusetts, USA
  • 2Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3University of Minnesota, Department of Soil, Water and Climate, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
  • 4Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California, USA

Abstract. We present a detailed description of the TES methanol (CH3OH) retrieval algorithm, along with initial global results showing the seasonal and spatial distribution of methanol in the lower troposphere. The full development of the TES methanol retrieval is described, including microwindow selection, error analysis, and the utilization of a priori and initial guess information provided by the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. Retrieval simulations and a sensitivity analysis using the developed retrieval strategy show that TES: (i) generally provides less than 1.0 piece of information, (ii) is sensitive in the lower troposphere with peak sensitivity typically occurring between ~900–700 hPa (~1–3 km) at a vertical resolution of ~5 km, (iii) has a limit of detectability between 0.5 and 1.0 ppbv Representative Volume Mixing Ratio (RVMR) depending on the atmospheric conditions, corresponding roughly to a profile with a maximum concentration of at least 1 to 2 ppbv, and (iv) in a simulation environment has a mean bias of 0.16 ppbv with a standard deviation of 0.34 ppbv. Applying the newly derived TES retrieval globally and comparing the results with corresponding GEOS-Chem output, we find generally consistent large-scale patterns between the two. However, TES often reveals higher methanol concentrations than simulated in the Northern Hemisphere spring, summer and fall. In the Southern Hemisphere, the TES methanol observations indicate a model overestimate over the bulk of South America from December through July, and a model underestimate during the biomass burning season.

Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint