137 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Soot and SO<sub>2</sub> contribution to the supersites in the MILAGRO campaign from elevated flares in the Tula Refinery V. Almanza et al. 10.5194/acp-12-10583-2012
2. Investigating the Sources of Formaldehyde and Corresponding Photochemical Indications at a Suburb Site in Shanghai From MAX‐DOAS Measurements S. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2020JD033351
3. Atmospheric formaldehyde, glyoxal and their relations to ozone pollution under low- and high-NOx regimes in summertime Shanghai, China Y. Guo et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105635
4. Composition and reactivity of volatile organic compounds in the South Coast Air Basin and San Joaquin Valley of California S. Liu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-10937-2022
5. MAX-DOAS Measurements of Tropospheric NO2 and HCHO Vertical Profiles at the Longfengshan Regional Background Station in Northeastern China S. Liu et al. 10.3390/s23063269
6. Dimethylamine Addition to Formaldehyde Catalyzed by a Single Water Molecule: A Facile Route for Atmospheric Carbinolamine Formation and Potential Promoter of Aerosol Growth M. Louie et al. 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b04887
7. Secondary organic aerosol production from local emissions dominates the organic aerosol budget over Seoul, South Korea, during KORUS-AQ B. Nault et al. 10.5194/acp-18-17769-2018
8. Strong regional transport of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during wintertime in Shanghai megacity of China Y. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117940
9. Open biomass burning emissions and their contribution to ambient formaldehyde in Guangdong province, China C. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155904
10. Current status of model predictions of volatile organic compounds and impacts on surface ozone predictions during summer in China Y. She et al. 10.5194/acp-24-219-2024
11. The characteristics and sources of roadside VOCs in Hong Kong: Effect of the LPG catalytic converter replacement programme L. Cui et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143811
12. Formaldehyde in the Tropical Western Pacific: Chemical Sources and Sinks, Convective Transport, and Representation in CAM‐Chem and the CCMI Models D. Anderson et al. 10.1002/2016JD026121
13. Spatio-temporal characterization of tropospheric ozone and its precursor pollutants NO2 and HCHO over South Asia U. Baruah et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151135
14. Study on the daytime OH radical and implication for its relationship with fine particles over megacity of Shanghai, China J. Nan et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.046
15. Adverse results of the economic crisis: A study on the emergence of enhanced formaldehyde (HCHO) levels seen from satellites over Greek urban sites I. Zyrichidou et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.03.017
16. On the uncertainty of anthropogenic aromatic volatile organic compound emissions: model evaluation and sensitivity analysis K. Oliveira et al. 10.5194/acp-24-7137-2024
17. Impact Assessment of COVID‐19 Lockdown on Vertical Distributions of NO2 and HCHO From MAX‐DOAS Observations and Machine Learning Models S. Zhang et al. 10.1029/2021JD036377
18. Ship-based MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, and HCHO distribution along the Yangtze River Q. Hong et al. 10.5194/acp-18-5931-2018
19. Relationship of Racial Composition and Cancer Risks from Air Toxics Exposure in Memphis, Tennessee, U.S.A. C. Jia et al. 10.3390/ijerph110807713
20. Application of an adjoint neighborhood‐scale chemistry transport model to the attribution of primary formaldehyde at Lynchburg Ferry during TexAQS II E. Olaguer 10.1002/jgrd.50406
21. Ozone formation in relation with combustion processes in highly populated urban areas P. Avino & M. Manigrasso 10.3934/environsci.2015.3.764
22. New Reactions for the Formation of Organic Nitrate in the Atmosphere G. Li et al. 10.1021/acsomega.2c03321
23. Uptake of gaseous formaldehyde by soil surfaces: a combination of adsorption/desorption equilibrium and chemical reactions G. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-16-10299-2016
24. Residential building materials: An important source of ambient formaldehyde in mainland China S. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106909
25. Comparison of three source apportionment methods based on observed and initial HCHO in Taiyuan, China Y. Cui et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171828
26. Response to the Letter on Wormhoudt, J.; Wood, E.; Knighton, W.; Kolb, C.; Herndon, S.; Olaguer, E. 2015. Vehicle emissions of radical precursors and related species observed in the 2009 SHARP campaign; J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 65: 699–706 J. Wormhoudt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2015.1053359
27. Evaluation of the NAQFC driven by the NOAA Global Forecast System (version 16): comparison with the WRF-CMAQ during the summer 2019 FIREX-AQ campaign Y. Tang et al. 10.5194/gmd-15-7977-2022
28. Stereoisomers of hydroxymethanes: Probing structural and spectroscopic features upon substitution I. Toumi et al. 10.1063/1.4972415
29. Formaldehyde and hydroperoxide distribution around the Arabian Peninsula – evaluation of EMAC model results with ship-based measurements D. Dienhart et al. 10.5194/acp-23-119-2023
30. Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (SAO OMPS) formaldehyde retrieval G. González Abad et al. 10.5194/amt-9-2797-2016
31. Impact of Covid-19 lockdown regulations on PM2.5 and trace gases (NO2, SO2, CH4, HCHO, C2H2O2 and O3) over Lahore, Pakistan I. Karim & B. Rappenglück 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119746
32. A new non-resonant laser-induced fluorescence instrument for the airborne in situ measurement of formaldehyde J. St. Clair et al. 10.5194/amt-10-4833-2017
33. Analysis of the effect of troposphere ozone on grain production in North China Plain and Yangtze River Delta W. XUYUAN & K. TATSUMI 10.2480/agrmet.D-23-00023
34. Apportioning aldehydes: Quantifying industrial sources of carbonyls S. Styler 10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.002
35. Ground-based formaldehyde across the Pearl River Delta: A snapshot and meta-analysis study X. Mo et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119935
36. Important Routes for Methanediol Formation by Formaldehyde Hydrolysis Catalyzed by Iodic Acid and for the Contribution to an Iodic Acid Sink by the Reaction of Formaldehyde with Iodic Acid Catalyzed by Atmospheric Water N. Lin et al. 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00109
37. Sources of Formaldehyde in Bountiful, Utah N. Bhardwaj et al. 10.3390/atmos12030375
38. Vehicle emissions of radical precursors and related species observed in the 2009 SHARP campaign J. Wormhoudt et al. 10.1080/10962247.2015.1008654
39. Sensitivity of Ambient Atmospheric Formaldehyde and Ozone to Precursor Species and Source Types Across the United States D. Luecken et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b05509
40. Satellite validation strategy assessments based on the AROMAT campaigns A. Merlaud et al. 10.5194/amt-13-5513-2020
41. Utility of Geostationary Lightning Mapper-derived lightning NO emission estimates in air quality modeling studies P. Cheng et al. 10.5194/acp-24-41-2024
42. Measurement of volatile organic compounds using tethered balloons in a polluted industrial site in Catalonia (Spain) I. Díez-Palet et al. 10.1007/s11356-024-34020-3
43. Space view of the decadal variation for typical air pollutants in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region in China Z. Wang et al. 10.1007/s11783-016-0853-y
44. Field Experience for Determination of Formaldehyde in Stack Emissions A. Cefalì et al. 10.3390/app121910150
45. Overview of the SHARP campaign: Motivation, design, and major outcomes E. Olaguer et al. 10.1002/2013JD019730
46. Formaldehyde column density measurements as a suitable pathway to estimate near‐surface ozone tendencies from space J. Schroeder et al. 10.1002/2016JD025419
47. Emission Ratios and Diurnal Variability of Volatile Organic Compounds and Influence of Industrial Emissions in Two Texas Cities S. Shrestha et al. 10.3390/atmos14061006
48. Determination of Urban Formaldehyde Emission Ratios in the Shanghai Megacity Y. Liu et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c06428
49. Characteristics of wintertime VOCs in suburban and urban Beijing: concentrations, emission ratios, and festival effects K. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-19-8021-2019
50. The influence of vegetation drought stress on formaldehyde and ozone distributions over a central European city H. Trimmel et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119768
51. Wintertime Formaldehyde: Airborne Observations and Source Apportionment Over the Eastern United States J. Green et al. 10.1029/2020JD033518
52. Mobile Laboratory Investigations of Industrial Point Source Emissions during the MOOSE Field Campaign T. Yacovitch et al. 10.3390/atmos14111632
53. VOCs characteristics and their ozone and SOA formation potentials in autumn and winter at Weinan, China. J. Li et al. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111821
54. Is There a Formaldehyde Deficit in Emissions Inventories for Southeast Michigan? E. Olaguer et al. 10.3390/atmos14030461
55. Spatial and temporal analysis of ambient carbonyls in a densely populated basin area of central Taiwan C. Liang et al. 10.1016/j.serj.2016.08.003
56. Observation-based modeling of ozone chemistry in the Seoul metropolitan area during the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (KORUS-AQ) J. Schroeder et al. 10.1525/elementa.400
57. Photochemical Conversion of Surrogate Emissions for Use in Toxicological Studies: Role of Particulate- and Gas-Phase Products J. Krug et al. 10.1021/acs.est.7b04879
58. Theoretical Studies on Gas-Phase Reactions of Sulfuric Acid Catalyzed Hydrolysis of Formaldehyde and Formaldehyde with Sulfuric Acid and H2SO4···H2O Complex B. Long et al. 10.1021/jp312844z
59. Attribution of primary formaldehyde and sulfur dioxide at Texas City during SHARP/formaldehyde and olefins from large industrial releases (FLAIR) using an adjoint chemistry transport model E. Olaguer et al. 10.1002/jgrd.50794
60. Main ozone-forming VOCs in the city of Sao Paulo: observations, modelling and impacts D. Alvim et al. 10.1007/s11869-016-0429-9
61. The Role of Catalysis in Alkanediol Decomposition: Implications for General Detection of Alkanediols and Their Formation in the Atmosphere M. Kumar & J. Francisco 10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07642
62. Dispersion-box modeling investigation of the influences of gasoline, diesel, M85 and E85 vehicle exhaust emission on photochemistry M. Gabay & E. Tas 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.05.142
63. Changes in ambient air quality and atmospheric composition and reactivity in the South East of the UK as a result of the COVID-19 lockdown K. Wyche et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142526
64. Houston’s rapid ozone increases: preconditions and geographic origins E. Couzo et al. 10.1071/EN13040
65. Pollution characteristics, sources, and photochemical roles of ambient carbonyl compounds in summer of Beijing, China W. Chai et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122403
66. Sources and budget analysis of ambient formaldehyde in the east-central area of the yangtze River Delta region, China D. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119801
67. Urban atmospheric formaldehyde concentrations measured by a differential optical absorption spectroscopy method X. Li et al. 10.1039/C3EM00545C
68. Airborne formaldehyde and volatile organic compound measurements over the Daesan petrochemical complex on Korea’s northwest coast during the Korea-United States Air Quality study A. Fried et al. 10.1525/elementa.2020.121
69. Seasonal behavior of carbonyls and source characterization of formaldehyde (HCHO) in ambient air K. Lui et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.004
70. Chemical condition and surface ozone in large cities of Texas during the last decade: Observational evidence from OMI, CAMS, and model analysis Y. Choi & A. Souri 10.1016/j.rse.2015.06.026
71. Characterisation of GOME-2 formaldehyde retrieval sensitivity W. Hewson et al. 10.5194/amt-6-371-2013
72. Measurements of formaldehyde at the U.S.–Mexico border during the Cal-Mex 2010 air quality study J. Zheng et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.09.041
73. Compact highly sensitive multi-species airborne mid-IR spectrometer D. Richter et al. 10.1007/s00340-015-6038-8
74. Sources of formaldehyde and their contributions to photochemical O3 formation at an urban site in the Pearl River Delta, southern China Z. Ling et al. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.11.140
75. Seasonal behavior and long-term trends of tropospheric ozone, its precursors and chemical conditions over Iran: A view from space Y. Choi & A. Souri 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.02.012
76. Sensitive Detection of Ambient Formaldehyde by Incoherent Broadband Cavity Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy J. Liu et al. 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04821
77. Urban core-downwind differences and relationships related to ozone production in a major urban area in Texas F. Guo et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118624
78. Summertime high resolution variability of atmospheric formaldehyde and non-methane volatile organic compounds in a rural background area M. de Blas et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.411
79. Aldehyde as a potential source of aminol in troposphere: Influence of water and formic acid catalysis on ammonolysis of formaldehyde S. Sarkar et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.05.069
80. Winter VOCs and OVOCs measured with PTR-MS at an urban site of India: Role of emissions, meteorology and photochemical sources S. Maji et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113651
81. A quantitative understanding of total OH reactivity and ozone production in a coastal industrial area during the Yokohama air quality study (AQUAS) campaign of summer 2019 J. Li et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118754
82. Chemical characteristics of atmospheric carbonyl compounds and source identification of formaldehyde in Wuhan, Central China Z. Yang et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.05.020
83. Sulfur is in the Air: Cyanolichen Marriages and Pollution D. Gunawardana et al. 10.1007/s10441-023-09465-7
84. Ambient and Emission Trends of Toxic Air Contaminants in California R. Propper et al. 10.1021/acs.est.5b02766
85. Investigation and modeling of diurnal variation in suburban ambient formaldehyde concentration S. Taguchi et al. 10.1007/s11356-020-11465-w
86. Identification of O3 Sensitivity to Secondary HCHO and NO2 Measured by MAX-DOAS in Four Cities in China C. Lu et al. 10.3390/rs16040662
87. Vertical distribution and temporal evolution of formaldehyde and glyoxal derived from MAX-DOAS observations: The indicative role of VOC sources Q. Hong et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2021.09.025
88. Investigating the temporal variation of formaldehyde using MAX-DOAS and satellite observations over Islamabad, Pakistan A. Shoaib et al. 10.1016/j.apr.2019.10.008
89. Measurement report: Observation-based formaldehyde production rates and their relation to OH reactivity around the Arabian Peninsula D. Dienhart et al. 10.5194/acp-21-17373-2021
90. Quantitative Kinetics of HO2 Reactions with Aldehydes in the Atmosphere: High-Order Dynamic Correlation, Anharmonicity, and Falloff Effects Are All Important B. Long et al. 10.1021/jacs.2c07994
91. Ethylene industrial emitters seen from space B. Franco et al. 10.1038/s41467-022-34098-8
92. Gas Phase Hydrolysis of Formaldehyde To Form Methanediol: Impact of Formic Acid Catalysis M. Hazra et al. 10.1021/jp4008043
93. Validation of OMI HCHO Products Using MAX-DOAS observations from 2010 to 2016 in Xianghe, Beijing: Investigation of the Effects of Aerosols on Satellite Products Y. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs11020203
94. Evaluating the feasibility of formaldehyde derived from hyperspectral remote sensing as a proxy for volatile organic compounds Q. Hong et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105777
95. Detection of formaldehyde emissions from an industrial zone in the Yangtze River Delta region of China using a proton transfer reaction ion-drift chemical ionization mass spectrometer Y. Ma et al. 10.5194/amt-9-6101-2016
96. Slower ozone production in Houston, Texas following emission reductions: evidence from Texas Air Quality Studies in 2000 and 2006 W. Zhou et al. 10.5194/acp-14-2777-2014
97. Evolution of formaldehyde (HCHO) in a plume originating from a petrochemical industry and its volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emission rate estimation C. Cho et al. 10.1525/elementa.2021.00015
98. Glyoxal retrieval from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument C. Chan Miller et al. 10.5194/amt-7-3891-2014
99. Contributions to local- and regional-scale formaldehyde concentrations L. Bastien et al. 10.5194/acp-19-8363-2019
100. An analysis of 30 years of surface ozone concentrations in Austria: temporal evolution, changes in precursor emissions and chemical regimes, temperature dependence, and lessons for the future M. Mayer et al. 10.1039/D2EA00004K
101. Multidecadal trends in ozone chemistry in the Baltimore-Washington Region S. Roberts et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119239
102. Exploration of sources of OVOCs in various atmospheres in southern China X. Huang et al. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.106
103. Dual ground-based MAX-DOAS observations in Vienna, Austria: Evaluation of horizontal and temporal NO2, HCHO, and CHOCHO distributions and comparison with independent data sets S. Schreier et al. 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100059
104. Anthropogenic emissions of highly reactive volatile organic compounds in eastern Texas inferred from oversampling of satellite (OMI) measurements of HCHO columns L. Zhu et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/114004
105. Characterizing the level, photochemical reactivity, emission, and source contribution of the volatile organic compounds based on PTR-TOF-MS during winter haze period in Beijing, China J. Sheng et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.05.005
106. Pollution characteristics, source appointment and environmental effect of oxygenated volatile organic compounds in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: Implication for air quality management G. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170836
107. Modeling of HCHO and CHOCHO at a semi-rural site in southern China during the PRIDE-PRD2006 campaign X. Li et al. 10.5194/acp-14-12291-2014
108. Formaldehyde Continuous Monitoring at a Rural Station North of Rome: Appraisal of Local Sources Contribution and Meteorological Drivers F. Vichi et al. 10.3390/atmos14121833
109. Chemistry of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Los Angeles Basin: Formation of Oxygenated Compounds and Determination of Emission Ratios J. de Gouw et al. 10.1002/2017JD027976
110. Reactive nitrogen around the Arabian Peninsula and in the Mediterranean Sea during the 2017 AQABA ship campaign N. Friedrich et al. 10.5194/acp-21-7473-2021
111. Comparison of formaldehyde measurements by Hantzsch, CRDS and DOAS in the SAPHIR chamber M. Glowania et al. 10.5194/amt-14-4239-2021
112. Personal exposure to aldehydes and potential health risks among schoolchildren in the city Y. Yen et al. 10.1007/s11356-023-29578-3
113. SO2 and HCHO over the major cities of Kazakhstan from 2005 to 2016: influence of political, economic and industrial changes Z. Darynova et al. 10.1038/s41598-020-69344-w
114. Laboratory Performance Evaluation of a Low-Cost Electrochemical Formaldehyde Sensor Z. Pei et al. 10.3390/s23177444
115. Air quality in the Industrial Heartland of Alberta, Canada and potential impacts on human health I. Simpson et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.09.017
116. Characterizing oxygenated volatile organic compounds and their sources in rural atmospheres in China Y. Han et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2019.01.017
117. Carbonyl compounds in the atmosphere: A review of abundance, source and their contributions to O3 and SOA formation Q. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106184
118. Chemistry of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Los Angeles basin: Nighttime Removal of Alkenes and Determination of Emission Ratios J. de Gouw et al. 10.1002/2017JD027459
119. Characterization of carbon monoxide, methane and nonmethane hydrocarbons in emerging cities of Saudi Arabia and Pakistan and in Singapore B. Barletta et al. 10.1007/s10874-016-9343-7
120. Investigation of formaldehyde and other carbonyls in a small urban atmosphere using passive samplers. A comprehensive data analysis F. Villanueva et al. 10.1016/j.microc.2021.106270
121. Spatial characterization of HCHO and reapportionment of its secondary sources considering photochemical loss in Taiyuan, China J. Hua et al. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161069
122. Evaluation of Aeris mid-infrared absorption (MIRA), Picarro CRDS (cavity ring-down spectroscopy) G2307, and dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH)-based sampling for long-term formaldehyde monitoring efforts A. Mouat et al. 10.5194/amt-17-1979-2024
123. Updated Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Ozone Monitoring Instrument (SAO OMI) formaldehyde retrieval G. González Abad et al. 10.5194/amt-8-19-2015
124. Source apportionment of formaldehyde during TexAQS 2006 using a source‐oriented chemical transport model H. Zhang et al. 10.1002/jgrd.50197
125. Combustion and Destruction/Removal Efficiencies of In-Use Chemical Flares in the Greater Houston Area E. Wood et al. 10.1021/ie202717m
126. Formaldehyde Exposure Racial Disparities in Southeast Texas Y. Li et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c02282
127. Understanding primary and secondary sources of ambient carbonyl compounds in Beijing using the PMF model W. Chen et al. 10.5194/acp-14-3047-2014
128. Source and variability of formaldehyde in the Fenwei Plain: An integrated multi-source satellite and emission inventory study L. Li et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2024.02.030
129. Anthropogenic VOCs in the Long Island Sound, NY Airshed and their role in ozone production A. Ring et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119583
130. Sources and Potential Photochemical Roles of Formaldehyde in an Urban Atmosphere in South China C. Wang et al. 10.1002/2017JD027266
131. Effect of Seasonal Variation on the Levels and Behaviours of Formaldehyde in the Atmosphere of a Suburban Area in Cairo, Egypt S. Hassan et al. 10.5572/ajae.2018.12.4.356
132. Volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of Mexico City J. Garzón et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.014
133. Multiple evaluations of atmospheric behavior between Criegee intermediates and HCHO: Gas-phase and air-water interface reaction T. Zhang et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2022.06.004
134. Investigation of formaldehyde sources and its relative emission intensity in shipping channel environment J. Liu et al. 10.1016/j.jes.2023.06.020
135. Characteristics of VOC Composition at Urban and Suburban Sites of New Delhi, India in Winter N. Tripathi et al. 10.1029/2021JD035342
136. Near-source air quality impacts of large olefin flares E. Olaguer 10.1080/10962247.2012.693054
137. Emission drivers and variability of ambient isoprene, formaldehyde and acetaldehyde in north-west India during monsoon season A. Mishra & V. Sinha 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115538