300 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The impact of nitrogen and sulfur emissions from shipping on the exceedance of critical loads in the Baltic Sea region S. Jutterström et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15827-2021
2. AIS-Based Estimation of Hydrogen Demand and Self-Sufficient Fuel Supply Systems for RoPax Ferries A. Fitz et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103482
3. International maritime regulation decreases sulfur dioxide but increases nitrogen oxide emissions in the North and Baltic Sea W. Van Roy et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01050-7
4. Long-term exposure to particulate matter from road traffic and residential heating and mortality: a multi-cohort study in Sweden L. Stockfelt et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37471-5
5. Prediction of harbour vessel emissions based on machine learning approach Z. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104214
6. The influence of spatiality on shipping emissions, air quality and potential human exposure in the Yangtze River Delta/Shanghai, China J. Feng et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6167-2019
7. A comparative methodological approach for the calculation of ships air emissions and fuel-energy consumption in two major Greek ports E. Doundoulakis & S. Papaefthimiou https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1946610
8. Projections of shipping emissions and the related impact on air pollution and human health in the Nordic region C. Geels et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12495-2021
9. Comparing emissions of polyaromatic hydrocarbons and metals from marine fuels and scrubbers A. Lunde Hermansson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102912
10. Contribution of ship emissions to the concentration of PM2.5: A comprehensive study using AIS data and WRF/Chem model in Bohai Rim Region, China D. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.255
11. Measurement report: The effects of SECA regulations on the atmospheric SO2 concentrations in the Baltic Sea, based on long-term observations on the Finnish island, Utö A. Maragkidou et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2443-2025
12. Impact on Population Health of Baltic Shipping Emissions L. Barregard et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111954
13. Developing a new green ship approach for flue gas emission estimation of bulk carriers L. Bilgili & U. Celebi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.002
14. Impact of AIS Data Thinning on Ship Air Pollutant Emissions Inventories Y. Tian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13071135
15. The HTAP_v3.2 emission mosaic: merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000–2020) to support air quality modelling and policies D. Guizzardi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-5915-2025
16. Influence of shipping activities on air and water quality in the Northern Adriatic Sea: A high-resolution modelling study L. Calgaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118102
17. A review on carbon emissions of global shipping S. Deng & Z. Mi https://doi.org/10.1007/s44312-023-00001-2
18. Port carbon emission estimation: Principles, practices, and machine learning applications Z. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104159
19. Shipborne nutrient dynamics and impact on the eutrophication in the Baltic Sea U. Raudsepp et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.264
20. Deep collaborative learning model for port-air pollutants prediction using automatic identification system S. Sim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103431
21. A distributed real-time power management scheme for shipboard zonal multi-microgrid system P. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119072
22. Volatility of a Ship’s Emissions in the Baltic Sea Using Modelling and Measurements in Real-World Conditions O. Kangasniemi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071175
23. A comprehensive inventory of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011 J. Jalkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-71-2016
24. Efficient Generation of Gridded Ship Emission Inventories from Massive AIS Data Using Spatial Hashing C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16111279
25. Modeling emissions for three-dimensional atmospheric chemistry transport models V. Matthias et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1424057
26. Improved definition of prior uncertainties in CO2 and CO fossil fuel fluxes and its impact on multi-species inversion with GEOS-Chem (v12.5) I. Super et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-7263-2024
27. A comprehensive analysis of strategies for reducing GHG emissions in maritime ports R. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2024.106455
28. Atmospheric emission assessment for LNG carriers: a state-of-the-art semi-empirical methodology C. Gutiérrez et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36037-8
29. Ship emissions in the decarbonization era: high-resolution inventories, atmospheric impacts, and air pollution–climate co-mitigation pathways R. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2026.100510
30. Ship emissions and the use of current air cleaning technology: contributions to air pollution and acidification in the Baltic Sea B. Claremar et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-8-901-2017
31. Shipping emission inventories in China's Bohai Bay, Yangtze River Delta, and Pearl River Delta in 2018 Z. Wan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.110882
32. Assessment of cumulative chemical hazard from shipping to the marine environment of the North-East Atlantic (OSPAR) R. Pfeiffer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2026.119787
33. COVID-19 impact on maritime traffic and corresponding pollutant emissions. The case of the Port of Barcelona A. Mujal-Colilles et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114787
34. Seasonal and Spatial Variability of Atmospheric Emissions from Shipping along the Northern Sea Route N. Figenschau & J. Lu https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031359
35. Air pollution exposure assessment for preschool children: Addressing spatial and temporal variations and social inequities Å. Watne et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.126555
36. Spatial–Temporal Distribution Characteristics and Correlation Analysis of Air Pollutants from Ships in Inland Ports L. Tong et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114214
37. Ship emissions measurement in the Arctic by plume intercepts of the Canadian Coast Guard icebreaker Amundsen from the Polar 6 aircraft platform A. Aliabadi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7899-2016
38. Modelling the shipping transition: Forecasting merchant fleet emissions to 2050 A. Garnier et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.102142
39. Port(s). A circular economy framework for sustainable ports in Spain . María Martínez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.016
40. Cost-benefit analysis of ships NOx Emission Control Areas (NECA) along China's coastal area J. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117830
41. Exhaust emission rates along German inland waterways D. Weber et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104955
42. An AIS–MRV Consistency-Enhanced Dynamic Network Framework for Shipping Traffic Resilience Assessment and Disruption Recovery Characterization R. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su18157917
43. Atmospheric Emissions in Ports Due to Maritime Traffic in Mexico G. Fuentes García et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111186
44. Charting the course to cleaner shipping routes: emission inventory for Baltic Sea shipping and green fuel potential R. Kumar et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2523919
45. Spatial-Temporal Ship Pollution Distribution Exploitation and Harbor Environmental Impact Analysis via Large-Scale AIS Data X. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12060960
46. European primary emissions of criteria pollutants and greenhouse gases in 2020 modulated by the COVID-19 pandemic disruptions M. Guevara et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-2521-2022
47. Policy change driven by an AIS-assisted marine emission inventory in Hong Kong and the Pearl River Delta S. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.070
48. Development of a high-resolution maritime emissions inventory for the Gulf of Mexico (GoM-HEI) based on AIS data M. Cortez-Huerta et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.127003
49. Ship emissions in hotelling phase and loading/unloading in Southeast Asia ports P. Nguyen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103223
50. Black carbon dynamics over the Northern Indian Ocean: Variability, emission sources, transport and future projections S. Singh & S. Tiwari https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2026.102263
51. Estimating Costs and Benefits of Sulphur Content Limits in Ship Fuel J. Kalli et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2013.808389
52. Diffusion and Superposition of Ship Exhaust Gas in Port Area Based on Gaussian Puff Model: A Case Study on Shenzhen Port L. Gan et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11020330
53. Online coupled regional meteorology chemistry models in Europe: current status and prospects A. Baklanov et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-317-2014
54. High-spatiotemporal-resolution ship emission inventory of China based on AIS data in 2014 D. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.051
55. Interactions Between Lightning and Ship Traffic M. Peterson https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA002926
56. Ship fuel sulfur content regulations may exacerbate mass coral bleaching events on the Great Barrier Reef R. Ryan et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03088-1
57. How Have Divergent Global Emission Trends Influenced Long‐Range Transported Ozone to North America? R. Mathur et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036926
58. Techno-economic and Environmental Comparison of Internal Combustion Engines and Solid Oxide Fuel Cells for Ship Applications L. Kistner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230328
59. Estimation of shipping emissions from maritime big data: A comprehensive review and prospective X. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2025.104313
60. Estimating fuel consumption in maritime transport E. Işıklı et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124142
61. Methodological and Uncertainty-Focused Evaluation of Tiered Approaches for Maritime Black Carbon Inventories in the Philippines J. Guevarra & K. Kim https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031549
62. From Monodisciplinary via Multidisciplinary to an Interdisciplinary Approach Investigating Air-Sea Interactions – a SOLAS Initiative C. Marandino et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2020.1773208
63. Low-cost emissions cuts in container shipping: Thinking inside the box H. Doukas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102815
64. Modelling of discharges from Baltic Sea shipping J. Jalkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-17-699-2021
65. A New Perspective at the Ship-Air-Sea-Interface: The Environmental Impacts of Exhaust Gas Scrubber Discharge S. Endres et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00139
66. A Lagrangian view on severe haze in Beijing: local and long-range sources of trace gases and primary and secondary aerosols B. Foreback et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121602
67. Insights into the spatial distribution of global, national, and subnational greenhouse gas emissions in the Emissions Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR v8.0) M. Crippa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2811-2024
68. Using the Multicomponent Aerosol FORmation Model (MAFOR) to Determine Improved VOC Emission Factors in Ship Plumes L. Fink et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics12060432
69. Estimated health impacts from maritime transport in the Mediterranean region and benefits from the use of cleaner fuels M. Viana et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105670
70. Improving maritime traffic emission estimations on missing data with CRBMs A. Gutierrez-Torre et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2020.103793
71. Multi-objective optimization of large cruise ship power plant configuration based on NSGA-Ⅱ algorithm and AHP-entropy weighted TOPSIS-VIKOR Y. Ding et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2026.105007
72. Impact of shipping emissions on air pollution and pollutant deposition over the Barents Sea J. Raut et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118832
73. IMPROVING TYPHOON AND WAVE FORECASTING ACCURACY USING SHIP OBSERVATION DATA AND ITS IMPACT ON SHIP ROUTE SELECTION T. SHIRAI et al. https://doi.org/10.2208/jscejj.24-17280
74. Effects of ship emissions on air quality in the Baltic Sea region simulated with three different chemistry transport models M. Karl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7019-2019
75. Long-term effects of total and source-specific particulate air pollution on incident cardiovascular disease in Gothenburg, Sweden L. Stockfelt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.05.036
76. Assessing the impact of ship emissions on the atmospheric chemical composition in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Piraeus port (Greece) A. Poupkou et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-33968-7
77. Long-Term Exposure to Particulate Air Pollution, Black Carbon, and Their Source Components in Relation to Ischemic Heart Disease and Stroke P. Ljungman et al. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4757
78. Physics-informed multi-objective optimization for fuel consumption and air-pollutant exposure in ship operations J. Yun et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2026.126293
79. A sampling method for calculating regional ship emission inventories X. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102617
80. Bayesian probabilistic forecasting for ship emissions J. Liu & O. Duru https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117540
81. Impact of external cost internalization on short sea shipping – The case of the Portugal-Northern Europe trade H. Abreu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2022.103544
82. Modeling of the Concentrations of Ultrafine Particles in the Plumes of Ships in the Vicinity of Major Harbors M. Karl et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030777
83. Effect of Seasonal Flow Field on Inland Ship Emission Assessment: A Case Study of Ferry H. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12187484
84. CAMS-REG-UNC-v8.1: a detailed uncertainty product for the gridded CAMS-REG-v8.1 emission inventory I. Super et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-18-6119-2026
85. Long-term exposure to particulate air pollution and presence and progression of carotid artery plaques - A northern Sweden VIPVIZA cohort study J. Sommar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113061
86. Waste Heat Source Profiles for Marine Application of Organic Rankine Cycle C. Ng et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10081122
87. Phosphorus flows on ships: Case study from the Baltic Sea M. Wilewska-Bien et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090218761761
88. Underwater noise emissions from ships during 2014–2020 J. Jalkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119766
89. Measurement and Modeling of Ship-Related Ultrafine Particles and Secondary Organic Aerosols in a Mediterranean Port City M. Karl et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11090771
90. Techno-economic analysis of renewable fuels for ships carrying bulk cargo in Europe B. Stolz et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00957-9
91. Big data–driven carbon emission traceability list and characteristics of ships in maritime transportation—a case study of Tianjin Port P. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27104-z
92. Methodologies for estimating shipping emissions and energy consumption: A comparative analysis of current methods J. Moreno-Gutiérrez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.04.083
93. Environmental impacts of grey water discharge from ships in the Baltic Sea E. Ytreberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.110891
94. Global assessment of shipping emissions in 2015 on a high spatial and temporal resolution L. Johansson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.042
95. Shipping emissions forecast in the Iberian Peninsula for 2050 impact on air quality, mortality and related costs R. Nunes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.139622
96. Alternative fuels to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from marine transport and promote UN sustainable development goals Z. Islam Rony et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.127220
97. Parameterizing the vertical downward dispersion of ship exhaust gas in the near field R. Badeke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5935-2021
98. Estimating ship emissions based on AIS data for port of Tianjin, China D. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.08.086
99. Estimation and Trend Analysis of Emissions from Ships Registered in Republic of Korea S. Park et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19122835
100. Modelling of ship engine exhaust emissions in ports and extensive coastal waters based on terrestrial AIS data – An Australian case study L. Goldsworthy & B. Goldsworthy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.009
101. Detection of NO2 pollution plumes from individual ships with the TROPOMI/S5P satellite sensor A. Georgoulias et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc445
102. Global Shipping Emissions from a Well-to-Wake Perspective: The MariTEAM Model D. Kramel et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03937
103. Load-Dependent Shipping Emission Factors Considering Alternative Fuels, Biofuels and Emission Control Technologies A. Grigoriadis et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17020122
104. Towards the declaration of the strait of Gibraltar as an environmental controlled area J. Moreno-Gutiérrez & V. Durán-Grados https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115042
105. Modelling spatial dispersion of contaminants from shipping lanes in the Baltic Sea I. Maljutenko et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112985
106. Observing network effect of shipping emissions from space: A natural experiment in the world’s busiest port S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad391
107. Model for leisure boat activities and emissions – implementation for the Baltic Sea L. Johansson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-1143-2020
108. Estimation of shipping emissions based on real-time data with different methods: A case study of an oceangoing container ship A. Ekmekçioğlu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01605-8
109. Environmental and Public Health Impacts of Shipping Emissions Following the IMO 2020 Sulfur Cap: A Systematic Literature Review T. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17080715
110. Compatibility study of mid-tier and detailed approaches for marine mobile emissions inventory in Durban port N. Manqele et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ae171b
111. Rapid saturation of cloud water adjustments to shipping emissions P. Manshausen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-12545-2023
112. Effect of ice class to vessel fuel consumption based on real-life MRV data M. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.01.014
113. Port-Related Shipping Gas Emissions—A Systematic Review of Research F. Bojić et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073603
114. Atmospheric emissions of European SECA shipping: long-term projections J. Kalli et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-013-0050-9
115. Quantifying Emerging Local Anthropogenic Emissions in the Arctic Region: The ACCESS Aircraft Campaign Experiment A. Roiger et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00169.1
116. Carbon emissions assessment of ultra large container vessel in Malacca and Singapore Straits based on dynamic spatiotemporal data D. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104302
117. How to recognize and measure the economic impacts of environmental regulation: The Sulphur Emission Control Area case A. Lähteenmäki-Uutela et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.224
118. Estimation of ship flue gas emissions in dynamic operational conditions with ANN L. Bilgili & U. Buğra Çelebi https://doi.org/10.1177/1475090220979457
119. High aerosol loading over the Bohai Sea: Long-term trend, potential sources, and impacts on surrounding cities L. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.108387
120. Modelling of ships as a source of underwater noise J. Jalkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-14-1373-2018
121. Teasing out the detail: How our understanding of marine AIS data can better inform industries, developments, and planning R. Shelmerdine https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.010
122. Shipping emissions and their impacts on air quality in China Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.098
123. Significant contribution of inland ships to the total NOx emissions along the Yangtze River X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5587-2023
124. Maritime sector contributions on NO2 surface concentrations in major ports of the Mediterranean Basin A. Pseftogkas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102228
125. AIS-based spatiotemporal carbon emission reduction potential of coastal shipping in China Y. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.130339
126. Combined machine learning and physics-based models for estimating fuel consumption of cargo ships B. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111435
127. Quantifying the contribution of shipping NOx emissions to the marine nitrogen inventory – a case study for the western Baltic Sea D. Neumann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/os-16-115-2020
128. The impact of ship emissions on air quality and human health in the Gothenburg area – Part 1: 2012 emissions L. Tang et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7509-2020
129. Analysis of the uncertainty of the AIS-based bottom-up approach for estimating ship emissions X. Chen & J. Yang https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115968
130. Estimating NOx emissions of individual ships from TROPOMI NO2 plumes T. Riess et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2025.114734
131. Dynamic calculation of ship exhaust emissions based on real-time AIS data L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102277
132. Development of exhaust emission factors for vessels: A review and meta-analysis of available data A. Grigoriadis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100142
133. Ship emissions reduction using weather ship routing optimisation C. Borén et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/14750902221082901
134. Characterization of pollutant discharges from ships within 100 nautical miles of China's coastline and certain inland river ports, 2022 X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117876
135. A Mid-Tier Approach to Estimating Durban’s Port Marine Mobile Emissions: Gauging Air Quality Impacts in South Durban N. Manqele et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15101207
136. Impact of China's ECA policies on air pollution in coastal cities: Empirical analysis based on synthetic-DID model J. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.104871
137. Impact of a nitrogen emission control area (NECA) on the future air quality and nitrogen deposition to seawater in the Baltic Sea region M. Karl et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1721-2019
138. Spatiotemporal Characterization of Ship Emissions in the Yangtze River Delta Region: Insights from High-Resolution AIS Data C. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17090810
139. Estimating spatiotemporal distribution of wastewater generated by ships in coastal areas Y. Shu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2022.106133
140. A novel scheme for shore power data to enhance containership-at-berth emission estimation J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104353
141. The impact of ship emissions on air quality and human health in the Gothenburg area – Part II: Scenarios for 2040 M. Ramacher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10667-2020
142. Algorithmic synergy in green shipping for joint path-speed optimization under dynamic ocean conditions Y. Shu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104583
143. AIS-Based Scenario Simulation for the Control and Improvement of Ship Emissions in Ports S. Kao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10020129
144. Invisible ship tracks show large cloud sensitivity to aerosol P. Manshausen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05122-0
145. Shipping and algae emissions have a major impact on ambient air mixing ratios of non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) and methanethiol on Utö Island in the Baltic Sea H. Hellén et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4717-2024
146. Unlocking shore power in St. Lawrence and Great Lakes for cargo ships H. Daniel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104230
147. Air pollutants from shipping: Costs of NOx emissions to the Baltic Sea I. Gren et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113824
148. High-resolution dispersion modelling of PM2.5, PM10, NOx and NO2 exposure in metropolitan areas in Sweden 2000‒2018 – large health gains due to decreased population exposure K. Kilbo Edlund et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-024-01535-0
149. Emissions in maritime transport: A decomposition analysis from the perspective of production-based and consumption-based emissions R. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2022.105125
150. Optimising O&M scheduling in offshore wind farms considering weather forecast uncertainty and wake losses M. de Matos Sá et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117518
151. Emissions assessment of bulk carriers in China's east Coast-Yangtze River maritime network based on different shipping modes J. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.110903
152. Event-based wave statistics for the Baltic Sea J. Björkqvist et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-4-osr8-10-2024
153. The impact of marine shipping and its DECA control on air quality in the Pearl River Delta, China H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.033
154. Green shipping: using AIS data to assess global emissions T. Hensel et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-020-00498-x
155. Temporal attention networks for variable-length multivariate time series in ship fuel consumption prediction R. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2026.105630
156. Optimization of shipping routes with AIS data B. Luin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2024.103042
157. A Lifecycle Analysis of a Floating Power Plant Using Biomethane as a Drop-In Fuel for Cold Ironing of Vessels at Anchorage G. Mallouppas et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18020253
158. PM2.5 and Dementia in a Low Exposure Setting: The Influence of Odor Identification Ability and APOE J. Andersson et al. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-220469
159. Review of Top-Down Method to Determine Atmospheric Emissions in Port. Case of Study: Port of Veracruz, Mexico G. Fuentes García et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10010096
160. Assessment of shipping emissions on four ports of Portugal R. Nunes et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.112
161. The impact of shipping emissions on air pollution in the greater North Sea region – Part 1: Current emissions and concentrations A. Aulinger et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-739-2016
162. Ship emission inventory and its impact on the PM 2.5 air pollution in Qingdao Port, North China D. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.021
163. A ship emission modeling system with scenario capabilities D. Schwarzkopf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2021.100132
164. Exposure to source-specific air pollution in residential areas and its association with dementia incidence: a cohort study in Northern Sweden A. Oudin et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-66166-y
165. A Novel Ship Fuel Sulfur Content Estimation Method Using Improved Gaussian Plume Model and Genetic Algorithms C. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13040690
166. The promises and perils of Automatic Identification System data T. Emmens et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114975
167. Air pollution emission inventory using national high-resolution spatial parameters for the Nordic countries and analysis of PM2.5 spatial distribution for road transport and machinery and off-road sectors V. Paunu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-1453-2024
168. Shipping Remains a Globally Significant Source of Anthropogenic PN Emissions Even after 2020 Sulfur Regulation N. Kuittinen et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03627
169. Environmental Impact of Lead-Acid Batteries: A Review of Sustainable Alternatives for Production and Recycling Based on Life Cycle Analysis D. Pincay-Pilay & E. Carrasco https://doi.org/10.3390/su172310815
170. An analysis of an AMSA ship survey and comparison with the Maritime Transport Emission Model (MTEM) R. Smit https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100203
171. Risk assessment of bilge water discharges in two Baltic shipping lanes K. Magnusson et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.09.035
172. Exploring the effectiveness of ECA policies in reducing pollutant emissions from merchant ships in Shanghai port waters K. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111164
173. Estimation of atmospheric emissions from maritime activity in the Veracruz port, Mexico G. Fuentes García et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2021.1902421
174. Estimates of Source Spectra of Ships from Long Term Recordings in the Baltic Sea I. Karasalo et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00164
175. Estimation and spatio-temporal analysis of ship exhaust emission in a port area L. Huang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.06.015
176. Mobile measurements of ship emissions in two harbour areas in Finland L. Pirjola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-149-2014
177. Power management optimization of hybrid power systems in electric ferries M. Al-Falahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.012
178. Global air quality and health impacts of domestic and international shipping Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac146b
179. Air emissions from ships in port: Does regulation make a difference? M. Tichavska et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.003
180. Ship emission estimation with high spatial-temporal resolution in the Yangtze River estuary using AIS data J. Weng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119297
181. Field test of available methods to measure remotely SOx and NOx emissions from ships J. Balzani Lööv et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014
182. A generative modeling framework for spatial-temporal shipping energy consumption under climate constraints Y. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2026.104794
183. Analysis of the Spatial and Temporal Distribution Pattern of Carbon Emissions from Ships In Ports G. Liu & J. Ma https://doi.org/10.54691/1x3gxb58
184. Assigning machinery power values for estimating ship exhaust emissions: Comparison of auxiliary power schemes B. Goldsworthy & L. Goldsworthy https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.014
185. Comparison of the Impact of Ship Emissions in Northern Europe and Eastern China D. Schwarzkopf et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060894
186. Modelling of ship resistance and power consumption for the global fleet: The MariTEAM model Y. Kim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.114758
187. Insights into the Global Characteristics of Shipping Exhaust Emissions at Berth M. Sha et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12091527
188. Changes in the SO2 Level and PM2.5 Components in Shanghai Driven by Implementing the Ship Emission Control Policy X. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03315
189. Cruise ship emissions in Norwegian waters: A geographical analysis M. Simonsen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.014
190. Assessing potential indicators of aerosol wet scavenging during long-range transport M. Hilario et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-37-2024
191. Estimation of Air Pollutant Emissions from Ships and Their Contributions in Korea S. Seol et al. https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2021.37.2.324
192. Port-city exhaust emission model: An application to cruise and ferry operations in Las Palmas Port M. Tichavska & B. Tovar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.05.021
193. Estimation of CO2 emissions for ship activities at container port as an effort towards a green port index M. Budiyanto et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.10.090
194. Quantitative impact of decarbonization options on air pollutants from different ship types A. Grigoriadis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104316
195. Emissions Assessment of Container Ships Sailing under Off-Design Conditions C. Borén et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11101983
196. Comparing modelled and measured exhaust gas components from two LNG-powered ships M. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2024.100275
197. Long-term exposure to particulate air pollution and black carbon in relation to natural and cause-specific mortality: a multicohort study in Sweden J. Nilsson Sommar et al. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046040
198. Health and climate impacts of ocean-going vessels in East Asia H. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3083
199. Air quality and radiative impacts of Arctic shipping emissions in the summertime in northern Norway: from the local to the regional scale L. Marelle et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2359-2016
200. Health Impact of Air Pollution from Shipping in the Baltic Sea: Effects of Different Spatial Resolutions in Sweden N. Mwase et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17217963
201. Lightning used to follow ship-tracks in Eastern Mediterranean winter thunderstorms Y. Yair et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108453
202. Valuating environmental impacts from ship emissions – The marine perspective E. Ytreberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.111958
203. Management Control Systems in port waste management: Evidence from Italy A. Di Vaio et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.12.001
204. Game Theory-Based shore power Analysis: From the perspective of policy makers S. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101341
205. Merging Multiple System Perspectives: The Key to Effective Inland Shipping Emission-Reduction Policy Design S. van der Werff et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13040716
206. Comprehensive techno-economic assessment of power technologies and synthetic fuels under discussion for ship applications L. Kistner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113459
207. Ship emission variations during the COVID-19 from global and continental perspectives W. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176633
208. Costs and benefits of low-sulphur fuel standard for Baltic Sea shipping J. Antturi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.064
209. Improving the global prediction of shipping emissions by modelling the effects of ambient conditions E. Majamäki et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180126
210. Underwater Noise Emissions from Ships During 2014-2020 J. Jalkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3951731
211. Potential impact of shipping on air pollution in the Mediterranean region – a multimodel evaluation: comparison of photooxidants NO2 and O3 L. Fink et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1825-2023
212. Calculating ships' real emissions of pollutants and greenhouse gases: Towards zero uncertainties J. Moreno-Gutiérrez & V. Durán-Grados https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141471
213. Airborne emission measurements of SO2 , NOx and particles from individual ships using a sniffer technique J. Beecken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1957-2014
214. Estimation and dispersion analysis of shipping emissions in Bandirma Port, Turkey S. Kuzu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-01057-6
215. Hybrid algorithm for optimal operation of hybrid energy systems in electric ferries M. Al-Falahi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115923
216. A multimodel evaluation of the potential impact of shipping on particle species in the Mediterranean Sea L. Fink et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-10163-2023
217. Local Arctic air pollution: Sources and impacts K. Law et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-017-0962-2
218. Management Innovation for Environmental Sustainability in Seaports: Managerial Accounting Instruments and Training for Competitive Green Ports beyond the Regulations A. Di Vaio & L. Varriale https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030783
219. Environmental cost and eco-efficiency from vessel emissions in Las Palmas Port M. Tichavska & B. Tovar https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2015.09.002
220. A comprehensive ship weather routing system using CMEMS products and A* algorithm M. Grifoll et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111427
221. Local Standards, Behavioral Adjustments, and Welfare: Evaluating California’s Ocean-Going Vessel Fuel Rule R. Klotz & J. Berazneva https://doi.org/10.1086/717585
222. Shanghai Port Carbon Emission Measurement Study L. Zhang https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v2i1.154
223. Spatial and Seasonal Dynamics of Ship Emissions over the Yangtze River Delta and East China Sea and Their Potential Environmental Influence Q. Fan et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b03965
224. Modelling the impact of present and future maritime transport on marine pollution at an environmentally sensitive coastal ecosystem (Saronikos gulf, eastern Mediterranean) V. Kolovoyiannis et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118335
225. A Real-Time Power Management Strategy for Hybrid Electrical Ships Under Highly Fluctuated Propulsion Loads P. Xie et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2022.3177843
226. Implementation of AIS Data for Estimation of Fuel Oil Consumption and Energy Efficiency Operational Index (EEOI) H. Prastowo et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1461/1/012048
227. Emission Abatement Technology Selection, Routing and Speed Optimization of Hybrid Ships A. Ritari et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9090944
228. Flexible Optimization of International Shipping Routes considering Carbon Emission Cost Y. Yu et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6678473
229. The impact of low-sulfur marine fuel policy on air pollution in global coastal cities J. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.horiz.2024.100130
230. Carbon intensity assessment and fuel pathway optimization under the international maritime Organization's new regulations T. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2026.148465
231. China’s embodied environmental impact on the Global Commons through provincial and spillover perspectives H. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/acb729
232. Evaluation of emission reduction strategies for berthing containerships: A case study of the Shekou Container Terminal Z. Wan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126820
233. Investment Analysis of Waste Heat Recovery System Installations on Ships’ Engines E. Olaniyi & G. Prause https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100811
234. Sustainability issues in maritime transport and main challenges of the shipping industry V. Koilo https://doi.org/10.21511/ee.10(1).2019.04
235. The inland waterway ship emission inventory modeling: The Yangtze River case X. Peng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104138
236. Health Impact of PM10, PM2.5 and Black Carbon Exposure Due to Different Source Sectors in Stockholm, Gothenburg and Umea, Sweden D. Segersson et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070742
237. Estimating emissions from fishing vessels: a big Beidou data analytical approach K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1418366
238. A prospective life cycle assessment framework for sustainable renewable fuels in international shipping: Hydrogen based e fuels S. Ha et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2025.116219
239. The HTAP_v3 emission mosaic: merging regional and global monthly emissions (2000–2018) to support air quality modelling and policies M. Crippa et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2667-2023
240. Impact of the emissions of international sea traffic on airborne deposition to the Baltic Sea and concentrations at the coastline⁎⁎The research has received funding from the European Regional Development Fund, Central Baltic INTERREG IV A programme within the SNOOP project. M. Hongisto https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.56-2.349
241. Shipping emissions in the Iberian Peninsula and the impacts on air quality R. Nunes et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9473-2020
242. Sea Port SO2 Atmospheric Emissions Influence on Air Quality and Exposure at Veracruz, Mexico G. Fuentes García et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13121950
243. The impact of shipping emissions on air pollution in the greater North Sea region – Part 2: Scenarios for 2030 V. Matthias et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-759-2016
244. Spatio-temporal Analysis of the factors affecting NOx concentration during the evaluation cycle of high pollution episodes in Tehran metropolitan M. Zarghamipour et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102177
245. Comparison of large-scale ship exhaust emissions across multiple resolutions: From annual to hourly data B. Goldsworthy et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116829
246. An emissions inventory of seaborne trade flows to and from the Port of Hamburg S. Gäde & M. Klauser https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-025-00212-4
247. CAMS-REG-v4: a state-of-the-art high-resolution European emission inventory for air quality modelling J. Kuenen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-491-2022
248. From Kitchen to Air: Emissions from India’s Thriving Restaurant Food Service Sector M. Gupta et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00043
249. Inland port vessel emissions inventory based on Ship Traffic Emission Assessment Model–Automatic Identification System Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814017712878
250. Long-term residential exposure to source-specific particulate matter and incidence of diabetes mellitus — A cohort study in northern Sweden J. Sommar et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114833
251. AIS in maritime research M. Svanberg et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103520
252. Microscopic Approach to Evaluate Energy Consumption and Emissions from Ships B. Ciuffo & A. Miola https://doi.org/10.3141/2273-06
253. Power models and average ship parameter effects on marine emissions inventories I. Brown & M. Aldridge https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2019.1580229
254. Effects of vertical ship exhaust plume distributions on urban pollutant concentration – a sensitivity study with MITRAS v2.0 and EPISODE-CityChem v1.4 R. Badeke et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-4077-2022
255. Life-cycle cost analysis of an innovative marine dual-fuel engine under uncertainties K. Bui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134847
256. A bibliometric analysis of scientific research trends in monitoring systems for measuring ship emissions L. Egan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26723-w
257. Advances in air quality research – current and emerging challenges R. Sokhi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4615-2022
258. The evolution of shipping emissions and the costs of regulation changes in the northern EU area L. Johansson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11375-2013
259. Evaluating long-term operational data of a Very Large Crude Carrier: Assessing the diesel engines waste heat potential for integrating ORC systems A. Stainchaouer et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.123974
260. Examining the influence of port ship activities on pollutant emissions in port environments X. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41208
261. Emission Inventory for Maritime Shipping Emissions in the North and Baltic Sea F. Dettner & S. Hilpert https://doi.org/10.3390/data8050085
262. Rethinking Ship Emission Hotspots: A 100 m Resolution AIS-Based Inventory for Coastal Chinese Waters S. Sun et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14100875
263. Emission factors of SO2, NOx and particles from ships in Neva Bay from ground-based and helicopter-borne measurements and AIS-based modeling J. Beecken et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5229-2015
264. The Future Impact of Shipping Emissions on Air Quality in Europe under Climate Change M. Russo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14071126
265. Characterization of OMI tropospheric NO2 over the Baltic Sea region I. Ialongo et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7795-2014
266. Assessing Shipping Induced Emissions Impact on Air Quality with Various Techniques: Initial Results of the SCIPPER project S. Mamarikas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.699
267. Data-driven decarbonization in the maritime industry: An integrative analytical review J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.26599/COMMTR.2026.9640002
268. Impact of ship-borne nitrogen deposition on the Gulf of Finland ecosystem: an evaluation**The work presented in this study was jointly funded by the European Regional Development Fund, Central Baltic INTERREG IV A Programme within the project SNOOP and the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP/2007–2011 within the projects ECOSUPPORT, grant agreement No. 217246. U. Raudsepp et al. https://doi.org/10.5697/oc.55-4.837
269. The influence of the waterjet propulsion system on the ships' energy consumption and emissions inventories V. Durán-Grados et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.291
270. Improved daily PM 2.5 estimates in India reveal inequalities in recent enhancement of air quality A. Kawano et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adq1071
271. Hierarchical Bayesian propulsion power models — A simplified example with cruise ships A. Solonen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.115226
272. Comparison of different plant layouts and fuel storage solutions for fuel cells utilization on a small ferry C. Dall’Armi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.02.138
273. Shipping and Air Quality in Italian Port Cities: State-of-the-Art Analysis of Available Results of Estimated Impacts E. Merico et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12050536
274. Mobile mapping of PM and PNC in a Baltic Sea harbour city: spatio-temporal variability and local ship-related emission events J. Bendl et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2026.103182
275. Effects of strengthening the Baltic Sea ECA regulations J. Jonson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13469-2019
276. Future Ship Emission Scenarios with a Focus on Ammonia Fuel D. Schwarzkopf et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050879
277. Quantifying Emerging Local Anthropogenic Emissions in the Arctic Region: The ACCESS Aircraft Campaign Experiment A. Roiger et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00169.1.2016.1.test
278. Assessing the efficiency of different mitigation strategies to reduce shipping related air pollution levels and exposure in the Mediterranean coastal region – An ensemble modelling approach E. Fragkou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121347
279. Data analytics for fuel consumption management in maritime transportation: Status and perspectives R. Yan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102489
280. Carbon spatial mapping of ship emissions for port-level mitigation policies in Busan, Korea W. Son et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2026.101784
281. Model calculations of the effects of present and future emissions of air pollutants from shipping in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea J. Jonson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-783-2015
282. Air quality monitoring in communities of the Canadian Arctic during the high shipping season with a focus on local and marine pollution A. Aliabadi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2651-2015
283. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs M. Sofiev et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02774-9
284. The local ship speed reduction effect on black carbon emissions measured at a remote marine station M. Heikkilä et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-8927-2024
285. Atmospheric ship emissions in ports: A review. Correlation with data of ship traffic D. Toscano & F. Murena https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100050
286. Refined source apportionment of nitrate aerosols based on isotopes and emission inventories in coastal city of northern China Y. Ni et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177388
287. Refinement of a model for evaluating the population exposure in an urban area J. Soares et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1855-2014
288. Accuracy and applicability of ship's fuel consumption prediction models: A comprehensive comparative analysis X. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.133187
289. Changes in air pollutant emissions in China during two clean-air action periods derived from the newly developed Inversed Emission Inventory for Chinese Air Quality (CAQIEI) L. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4351-2024
290. Urban population exposure to NOx emissions from local shipping in three Baltic Sea harbour cities – a generic approach M. Ramacher et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9153-2019
291. Modelling the dispersion of particle numbers in five European cities J. Kukkonen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-451-2016
292. Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem J. Schmale et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000952
293. The high-resolution global shipping emission inventory by the Shipping Emission Inventory Model (SEIM) W. Yi et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-277-2025
294. A Comprehensive Inventory of the Ship Traffic Exhaust Emissions in the Baltic Sea from 2006 to 2009 J. Jalkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0389-3
295. Implementation of different big-leaf canopy reduction functions in the Biogenic Emission Inventory System (BEIS) and their impact on concentrations of oxidized nitrogen species in northern Europe J. Arndt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.035
296. An evaluation of the photochemical air quality modeling using CMAQ in the industrial area of Quintero-Puchuncavi-Concon, Chile E. Pino-Cortés et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101336
297. The contribution of shipping to the emission of water and air pollutants in the northern Adriatic Sea - current and future scenarios L. Calgaro et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.117573
298. Methods for identifying aged ship plumes and estimating contribution to aerosol exposure downwind of shipping lanes S. Ausmeel et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-4479-2019
299. Comparison of High-Resolution Gridded Emission Maps of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide in Europe: GRACED & CAMS-REG Q. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c07289
300. Quantification of lightning-induced nitrogen oxide emissions over Europe J. Arndt et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.059