Articles | Volume 12, issue 22
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10887-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10887-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Sea-spray geoengineering in the HadGEM2-ES earth-system model: radiative impact and climate response
A. Jones
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
J. M. Haywood
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 4,804 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 17 Aug 2012)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,961 | 1,660 | 183 | 4,804 | 131 | 99 |
- HTML: 2,961
- PDF: 1,660
- XML: 183
- Total: 4,804
- BibTeX: 131
- EndNote: 99
Total article views: 4,126 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 16 Nov 2012)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2,583 | 1,384 | 159 | 4,126 | 115 | 91 |
- HTML: 2,583
- PDF: 1,384
- XML: 159
- Total: 4,126
- BibTeX: 115
- EndNote: 91
Total article views: 678 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 17 Aug 2012)
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
378 | 276 | 24 | 678 | 16 | 8 |
- HTML: 378
- PDF: 276
- XML: 24
- Total: 678
- BibTeX: 16
- EndNote: 8
Cited
28 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals M. Lawrence et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- Polar Cooling Effect Due to Increase of Phytoplankton and Dimethyl-Sulfide Emission A. Kim et al. 10.3390/atmos9100384
- Evidence of the complexity of aerosol transport in the lower troposphere on the Namibian coast during AEROCLO-sA P. Chazette et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14979-2019
- Absorption of aerosols above clouds from POLDER/PARASOL measurements and estimation of their direct radiative effect F. Peers et al. 10.5194/acp-15-4179-2015
- Modelling artificial sea salt emission in large eddy simulations Z. Maalick et al. 10.1098/rsta.2014.0051
- Tropical rainforest response to marine sky brightening climate engineering H. Muri et al. 10.1002/2015GL063363
- Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2016EF000389
- A protocol for model intercomparison of impacts of marine cloud brightening climate intervention P. Rasch et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024
- The effects of timing and rate of marine cloud brightening aerosol injection on albedo changes during the diurnal cycle of marine stratocumulus clouds A. Jenkins et al. 10.5194/acp-13-1659-2013
- Hydrological Consequences of Solar Geoengineering K. Ricke et al. 10.1146/annurev-earth-031920-083456
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Marine cloud brightening – as effective without clouds L. Ahlm et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13071-2017
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- Response to marine cloud brightening in a multi-model ensemble C. Stjern et al. 10.5194/acp-18-621-2018
- Negative emissions technologies: A complementary solution for climate change mitigation J. Pires 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.004
- Key factors governing uncertainty in the response to sunshade geoengineering from a comparison of the GeoMIP ensemble and a perturbed parameter ensemble P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2013JD020716
- The Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in Southern Africa Field Campaign in Namibia: Overview, Illustrative Observations, and Way Forward P. Formenti et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0278.1
- Diminished efficacy of regional marine cloud brightening in a warmer world J. Wan et al. 10.1038/s41558-024-02046-7
- Evaporative Cooling Does Not Prevent Vertical Dispersion of Effervescent Seawater Aerosol for Brightening Clouds D. Hernandez-Jaramillo et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c04793
- A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise R. Minunno et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104431
- A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2019JD031883
- The Shortwave Radiative Flux Response to an Injection of Sea Salt Aerosols in the Gulf of Mexico P. Goddard et al. 10.1029/2022JD037067
- A comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemes J. Crook et al. 10.1002/2015JD023269
- The Radiative and Cloud Responses to Sea Salt Aerosol Engineering in GFDL Models N. Mahfouz et al. 10.1029/2022GL102340
- Geoengineering the oceans: an emerging frontier in international climate change governance J. McGee et al. 10.1080/18366503.2017.1400899
- The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021
- Comparison of the Fast and Slow Climate Response to Three Radiation Management Geoengineering Schemes L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2018JD029034
27 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals M. Lawrence et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- Polar Cooling Effect Due to Increase of Phytoplankton and Dimethyl-Sulfide Emission A. Kim et al. 10.3390/atmos9100384
- Evidence of the complexity of aerosol transport in the lower troposphere on the Namibian coast during AEROCLO-sA P. Chazette et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14979-2019
- Absorption of aerosols above clouds from POLDER/PARASOL measurements and estimation of their direct radiative effect F. Peers et al. 10.5194/acp-15-4179-2015
- Modelling artificial sea salt emission in large eddy simulations Z. Maalick et al. 10.1098/rsta.2014.0051
- Tropical rainforest response to marine sky brightening climate engineering H. Muri et al. 10.1002/2015GL063363
- Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2016EF000389
- A protocol for model intercomparison of impacts of marine cloud brightening climate intervention P. Rasch et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024
- The effects of timing and rate of marine cloud brightening aerosol injection on albedo changes during the diurnal cycle of marine stratocumulus clouds A. Jenkins et al. 10.5194/acp-13-1659-2013
- Hydrological Consequences of Solar Geoengineering K. Ricke et al. 10.1146/annurev-earth-031920-083456
- Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
- Marine cloud brightening – as effective without clouds L. Ahlm et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13071-2017
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- Response to marine cloud brightening in a multi-model ensemble C. Stjern et al. 10.5194/acp-18-621-2018
- Negative emissions technologies: A complementary solution for climate change mitigation J. Pires 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.004
- Key factors governing uncertainty in the response to sunshade geoengineering from a comparison of the GeoMIP ensemble and a perturbed parameter ensemble P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2013JD020716
- The Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in Southern Africa Field Campaign in Namibia: Overview, Illustrative Observations, and Way Forward P. Formenti et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0278.1
- Diminished efficacy of regional marine cloud brightening in a warmer world J. Wan et al. 10.1038/s41558-024-02046-7
- Evaporative Cooling Does Not Prevent Vertical Dispersion of Effervescent Seawater Aerosol for Brightening Clouds D. Hernandez-Jaramillo et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c04793
- A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise R. Minunno et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104431
- A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2019JD031883
- The Shortwave Radiative Flux Response to an Injection of Sea Salt Aerosols in the Gulf of Mexico P. Goddard et al. 10.1029/2022JD037067
- A comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemes J. Crook et al. 10.1002/2015JD023269
- The Radiative and Cloud Responses to Sea Salt Aerosol Engineering in GFDL Models N. Mahfouz et al. 10.1029/2022GL102340
- Geoengineering the oceans: an emerging frontier in international climate change governance J. McGee et al. 10.1080/18366503.2017.1400899
- The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint