26 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris Agreement temperature goals M. Lawrence et al. 10.1038/s41467-018-05938-3
2. Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
3. Polar Cooling Effect Due to Increase of Phytoplankton and Dimethyl-Sulfide Emission A. Kim et al. 10.3390/atmos9100384
4. Evidence of the complexity of aerosol transport in the lower troposphere on the Namibian coast during AEROCLO-sA P. Chazette et al. 10.5194/acp-19-14979-2019
5. Absorption of aerosols above clouds from POLDER/PARASOL measurements and estimation of their direct radiative effect F. Peers et al. 10.5194/acp-15-4179-2015
6. Modelling artificial sea salt emission in large eddy simulations Z. Maalick et al. 10.1098/rsta.2014.0051
7. Tropical rainforest response to marine sky brightening climate engineering H. Muri et al. 10.1002/2015GL063363
8. Towards a comprehensive climate impacts assessment of solar geoengineering P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2016EF000389
9. The effects of timing and rate of marine cloud brightening aerosol injection on albedo changes during the diurnal cycle of marine stratocumulus clouds A. Jenkins et al. 10.5194/acp-13-1659-2013
10. Hydrological Consequences of Solar Geoengineering K. Ricke et al. 10.1146/annurev-earth-031920-083456
11. Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
12. Marine cloud brightening – as effective without clouds L. Ahlm et al. 10.5194/acp-17-13071-2017
13. G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
14. Response to marine cloud brightening in a multi-model ensemble C. Stjern et al. 10.5194/acp-18-621-2018
15. Negative emissions technologies: A complementary solution for climate change mitigation J. Pires 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.004
16. Key factors governing uncertainty in the response to sunshade geoengineering from a comparison of the GeoMIP ensemble and a perturbed parameter ensemble P. Irvine et al. 10.1002/2013JD020716
17. The Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in Southern Africa Field Campaign in Namibia: Overview, Illustrative Observations, and Way Forward P. Formenti et al. 10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0278.1
18. Evaporative Cooling Does Not Prevent Vertical Dispersion of Effervescent Seawater Aerosol for Brightening Clouds D. Hernandez-Jaramillo et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c04793
19. A systematic literature review considering the implementation of planetary geoengineering techniques for the mitigation of sea-level rise R. Minunno et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104431
20. A Model‐Based Investigation of Terrestrial Plant Carbon Uptake Response to Four Radiation Modification Approaches L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2019JD031883
21. The Shortwave Radiative Flux Response to an Injection of Sea Salt Aerosols in the Gulf of Mexico P. Goddard et al. 10.1029/2022JD037067
22. A comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemes J. Crook et al. 10.1002/2015JD023269
23. The Radiative and Cloud Responses to Sea Salt Aerosol Engineering in GFDL Models N. Mahfouz et al. 10.1029/2022GL102340
24. Geoengineering the oceans: an emerging frontier in international climate change governance J. McGee et al. 10.1080/18366503.2017.1400899
25. The CLoud–Aerosol–Radiation Interaction and Forcing: Year 2017 (CLARIFY-2017) measurement campaign J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-21-1049-2021
26. Comparison of the Fast and Slow Climate Response to Three Radiation Management Geoengineering Schemes L. Duan et al. 10.1029/2018JD029034