Articles | Volume 10, issue 16
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7697–7707, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7697-2010
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7697–7707, 2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7697-2010

  18 Aug 2010

18 Aug 2010

Options to accelerate ozone recovery: ozone and climate benefits

J. S. Daniel1, E. L. Fleming2,3, R. W. Portmann1, G. J. M. Velders4, C. H. Jackman2, and A. R. Ravishankara1 J. S. Daniel et al.
  • 1National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
  • 2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 20771, USA
  • 3Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD 20706, USA
  • 4Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 3720 AH Bilthoven, The Netherlands

Abstract. Hypothetical reductions in future emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) and N2O are evaluated in terms of effects on equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC), globally-averaged total column ozone, and radiative forcing through 2100. Due to the established success of the Montreal Protocol, these actions can have only a fraction of the impact on ozone depletion that regulations already in force have had. If all anthropogenic ODS and N2O emissions were halted beginning in 2011, ozone is calculated to be higher by about 1–2% during the period 2030–2100 compared to a case of no additional restrictions. Direct radiative forcing by 2100 would be about 0.23 W/m2 lower from the elimination of anthropogenic N2O emissions and about 0.005 W/m2 lower from the destruction of the chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) bank. Due to the potential impact of N2O on future ozone levels, we provide an approach to incorporate it into the EESC formulation, which is used extensively in ozone depletion analyses. The ability of EESC to describe total ozone changes arising from additional ODS and N2O controls is also quantified.

Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint