Articles | Volume 10, issue 13 
            
                
                    
            
            
            
        https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6129-2010
                    © Author(s) 2010. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
                Interpreting the cloud cover – aerosol optical depth relationship found in satellite data using a general circulation model
Download
- Final revised paper (published on 07 Jul 2010)
- Supplement to the final revised paper
- Preprint (discussion started on 04 Dec 2009)
- Supplement to the preprint
Interactive discussion
            AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
        
     - Printer-friendly version
 - Printer-friendly version
            
            
             - Supplement
 - Supplement
 
        - 
                RC C9085:  'To what extent can non-resolving cloud model address the complex question of aerosol indirect effect on total cloud cover?', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Dec 2009
                
                      - 
                                
                                AC C10564:  'Response to Reviewer #1', Johannes Quaas, 05 Feb 2010
                                
                                      
 
- 
                                
                                AC C10564:  'Response to Reviewer #1', Johannes Quaas, 05 Feb 2010
                                
                                    
- 
                RC C9454:  'Review of: “Interpreting the cloud cover-aerosol optical depth relationship found in satellite data using a general circulation model” Quaas et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 08 Jan 2010
                
                      - 
                                
                                AC C10568:  'Response to Reviewer #2', Johannes Quaas, 05 Feb 2010
                                
                                      
 
- 
                                
                                AC C10568:  'Response to Reviewer #2', Johannes Quaas, 05 Feb 2010
                                
                                    
 
 
                     
                     
                     
                    