Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-9-3307-2009
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-9-3307-2009
02 Feb 2009
 | 02 Feb 2009
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Sulfur isotope analysis of individual aerosol particles – a new tool for studying heterogeneous oxidation processes in the marine environment

B. W. Sinha, P. Hoppe, J. Huth, S. Foley, and M. O. Andreae

Abstract. Understanding the importance of the different oxidation pathways of sulfur dioxide (SO2) to sulfate is crucial for an interpretation of the climate effects of sulfate aerosols. Sulfur isotope analysis of atmospheric aerosol is a well established tool for identifying sources of sulfur in the atmosphere and assessment of anthropogenic influence. The power of this tool is enhanced by a new ion microprobe technique that permits isotope analysis of individual aerosol particles as small as 0.5 μm diameter. With this new single particle technique, different types of primary and secondary sulfates are first identified based on their chemical composition, and then their individual isotopic signature is measured. Our samples were collected at Mace Head, Ireland, a remote coastal station on the North Atlantic Ocean. Sea-salt-sulfate (10–60%), ammonium sulfate/sulfuric acid particles (15–65%), and non-sea-salt-sulfate (nss-sulfate) on aged salt particles all contributed significantly to sulfate loadings in our samples.

The isotopic composition of secondary sulfates depends on the isotopic composition of precursor SO2 and the oxidation process. The fractionation with respect to the source SO2 is poorly characterized. In the absence of conclusive laboratory experiments, we consider the kinetic fractionation of −9‰ during the gas phase oxidation of SO2 by OH as suggested by Saltzman et al. (1983) and Tanaka et al. (1994) to be the most reasonable estimate for the isotope fractionation during gas phase oxidation of SO2hom=0.991) and the equilibrium fractionation for the uptake of SO2(g) into the aqueous phase and the dissociation to HSO3 of +16.5‰ measured by Eriksen (1972a) to be the best approximation for the fractionation during oxidation in the aqueous phase (αhet=1.0165). The sulfur isotope ratio of secondary sulfate particles can therefore be used to identify the oxidation pathway by which this sulfate was formed. However, the fraction of heterogeneous and homogeneous oxidation pathway calculated is very sensitive to the isotope fractionation assumed for both pathways. Particles with known oxidation pathway (fine mode ammonium sulfate) are used to estimate the isotopic composition of the source SO2. It ranged from δ34SVCDT=0±3‰ to δ34SVCDT=(14±3)‰ under clean conditions and δ34SVCDT=(3±1)‰ under polluted condition. Condensation of H2SO4(g) onto sea salt aerosol produces an isotopic ratio that, when plotted against the sea-salt-sulfate content of the sample, lies on a mixing line between sea salt and ammonium sulfate. The contribution of heterogeneous oxidation is estimated based on the deviation of non-sea-salt-sulfate from this isotopic mixing line.

The contribution of heterogeneous oxidation to nss-sulfate formation on aged sea salt sodium sulfate, magnesium sulfate gypsum and mixed sulfate particles under clean conditions is on average 10% for coarse and 25% for fine mode particles. Under polluted conditions, the contribution of heterogeneous oxidation to nss-sulfate formation increased to 60% on coarse mode and 75% on fine mode particles. However, large day-to-day variations in the contribution of heterogeneous oxidation to nss-sulfate formation occurred. Our results suggest that a~significant portion of SO2 in coastal regions is converted to fine mode ammonium sulfate/sulfuric acid particles (40–80% of nss-sulfate) and that condensation of H2SO4(g) contributes significantly even to the nss-sulfate in aged sea salt particles (20–85%).

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
B. W. Sinha, P. Hoppe, J. Huth, S. Foley, and M. O. Andreae
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
B. W. Sinha, P. Hoppe, J. Huth, S. Foley, and M. O. Andreae
B. W. Sinha, P. Hoppe, J. Huth, S. Foley, and M. O. Andreae

Viewed

Total article views: 1,945 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,360 454 131 1,945 121 117
  • HTML: 1,360
  • PDF: 454
  • XML: 131
  • Total: 1,945
  • BibTeX: 121
  • EndNote: 117
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics