Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-7-8361-2007
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-7-8361-2007
18 Jun 2007
 | 18 Jun 2007
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Development of a secondary organic aerosol formation mechanism: comparison with smog chamber experiments and atmospheric measurements

L. E. Olcese, J. E. Penner, and S. Sillman

Abstract. A new mechanism to simulate the formation of secondary organic aerosols (SOA) from reactive primary hydrocarbons is presented, together with comparisons with experimental smog chamber results and ambient measurements found in the literature. The SOA formation mechanism is based on an approach using calculated vapor pressures and a selection of species that can partition to the aerosol phase from a gas phase photochemical mechanism. The mechanism has been validated against smog chamber measurements using α-pinene, xylene and toluene as SOA precursors, and has an average error of 17%. Qualitative comparisons with smog chamber measurements using isoprene were also performed. A comparison against SOA production in the TORCH 2003 experiment (atmospheric measurements) had an average error of only 12%. This contrasts with previous efforts, in which it was necessary to increase partition coefficients by a factor of 500 in order to match the observed values. Calculations for rural and urban-influenced regions in the eastern U.S. suggest that most of the SOA is biogenic in origin, mainly originated from isoprene. A 0-dimensional calculation based on the New England Air Quality Study also showed good agreement with measured SOA, with about 40% of the total SOA from anthropogenic precursors. This mechanism can be implemented in a general circulation model (GCM) to estimate global SOA formation under ambient NOx and HOx levels.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
L. E. Olcese, J. E. Penner, and S. Sillman
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
L. E. Olcese, J. E. Penner, and S. Sillman
L. E. Olcese, J. E. Penner, and S. Sillman

Viewed

Total article views: 1,245 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
806 349 90 1,245 86 86
  • HTML: 806
  • PDF: 349
  • XML: 90
  • Total: 1,245
  • BibTeX: 86
  • EndNote: 86
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics