Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-4-991-2004
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-4-991-2004
11 Feb 2004
 | 11 Feb 2004
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Tropospheric ozone budget: regional and global calculations

F. M. O’Connor, K. S. Law, J. A. Pyle, H. Barjat, N. Brough, K. Dewey, T. Green, J. Kent, and G. Phillips

Abstract. Results from a tropospheric three-dimensional chemical transport model (TOMCAT) have been used to examine the terms of the ozone budget, both regionally and globally. The global calculations are discussed in light of other published estimates. Regional budgets are calculated for continental regions, including the American Mid-West, Sahara, and central Europe. These are compared with regional budgets for oceanic regions, including the Azores High and the Tropical Pacific Warm Pool. Furthermore, the coastal region of the UK and Ireland is also considered. The validity of these regional budgets from TOMCAT are discussed by comparing TOMCAT with measurements from a number of aircraft campaigns. The budgets for central Europe and the American Mid-West indicate that continental regions dominate the ozone budget of the northern extratropics. This is in spite of the remote oceanic regions being photochemical sinks for ozone. The regional budget calculations for the UK and Ireland exhibit net photochemical production of ozone in the boundary layer but this is not consistent with available aircraft measurements. This is attributed to the coarse horizontal resolution of the TOMCAT model which results in the model's photochemical budget being more typical of a polluted continental region than a relatively remote one. On the other hand, the ozone photochemical rates calculated for the Azores High and the Tropical Pacific Warm Pool agree rather well with other estimates.

F. M. O’Connor, K. S. Law, J. A. Pyle, H. Barjat, N. Brough, K. Dewey, T. Green, J. Kent, and G. Phillips
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
F. M. O’Connor, K. S. Law, J. A. Pyle, H. Barjat, N. Brough, K. Dewey, T. Green, J. Kent, and G. Phillips
F. M. O’Connor, K. S. Law, J. A. Pyle, H. Barjat, N. Brough, K. Dewey, T. Green, J. Kent, and G. Phillips

Viewed

Total article views: 1,340 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
818 372 150 1,340 103 100
  • HTML: 818
  • PDF: 372
  • XML: 150
  • Total: 1,340
  • BibTeX: 103
  • EndNote: 100
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 01 May 2024
Download
Altmetrics