Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-3-5777-2003
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-3-5777-2003

  14 Nov 2003

14 Nov 2003

Review status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP. A revision for further review has not been submitted.

Problems regarding the tropospheric O3 residual method and its interpretation in Fishman et al. (2003)

A. D. J. de Laat and I. Aben A. D. J. de Laat and I. Aben
  • National Institute for Space Research (SRON) Utrecht, The Netherlands

Abstract. In this article we will show that the Total Ozone Residuals (TOR) method as presented by Fishman et al. (2003) contains an erroneous assumption, due to which the TOR as presented in this article reflects mainly a tropospheric O3 climatology (Logan, 1999), scaled to the layer between the surface and the tropopause height, rather than a satellite measured TOR. We will show that it is possible to obtain a tropospheric O3  column that is very similar to what is being presented in Fishman et al. (2003), solely based on the Logan (1999) tropospheric O3  climatology and an estimate for the tropopause heights without using satellite data. Furthermore, we will show that one of the interpretations of observed O3  variability (high TOR values over Southeast Asia) is not the result of pollution, but primarily of tropopause height variations. We suggest adjusting the method in such a way that the final retrieved TOR product becomes independent of the actual values of the Logan (1999) O3  climatology. The proposed adjustments are also more in line with the original methodology suggested by Fishman and Balok (1999) in a previous paper. We furthermore show that the assumption that the stratospheric O3  column is nearly constant within a 5-day period is not always valid. This can introduce errors in the final TOR product, although we recognize that these errors may become small when averaging the TOR product over longer periods of time. However, we feel that a detailed study on this assumption is also needed.

A. D. J. de Laat and I. Aben

 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

A. D. J. de Laat and I. Aben

A. D. J. de Laat and I. Aben

Viewed

Total article views: 646 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
292 233 121 646 126 135
  • HTML: 292
  • PDF: 233
  • XML: 121
  • Total: 646
  • BibTeX: 126
  • EndNote: 135
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Cited

Latest update: 12 May 2021
Download
Altmetrics