Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-431
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-431
02 Aug 2022
 | 02 Aug 2022
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Seasonal variation in size-resolved particle deposition and the effect of environmental conditions on dry deposition in a pine forest

Erin K. Boedicker, Holly M. DeBolt, Ryan Fulgam, Ethan W. Emerson, and Delphine K. Farmer

Abstract. Dry deposition is a fundamental process that removes particles from the atmosphere, and therefore directly controls their lifetime and total impact on air quality and radiative forcing. The processes influencing dry deposition are poorly constrained in models. Seasonal changes in dry deposition remain uncertain due to the lack of observations over multiple seasons. We present measurements of size-resolved sub-micron particle deposition from a flux study that surveyed all four major seasons. Particle concentrations and therefore fluxes were highest in the summer and lowest in the winter. Size-dependent deposition velocities in all seasons were consistent with previously observed trends, however, our observations show a 130 ± 60 % increase in wintertime deposition velocity compared to the summer, which is not currently captured in size-resolved deposition models. We explore the influence of scalar gradients and changes in environmental conditions as possible drivers of this increase. We find that phoretic effects, such as thermophoresis, and the addition of snow to the canopy had negligible impacts on our canopy level measurements. While turbophoresis impacted the observed seasonal changes in size-resolved particle deposition velocity, it did not fully explain the observed differences between the summer and winter. We suggest that the increase in deposition velocity is instead caused by changes to the leaf-level conditions and physiology during the wintertime, which increase interception of particles.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Erin K. Boedicker, Holly M. DeBolt, Ryan Fulgam, Ethan W. Emerson, and Delphine K. Farmer

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Erin K. Boedicker, Holly M. DeBolt, Ryan Fulgam, Ethan W. Emerson, and Delphine K. Farmer
Erin K. Boedicker, Holly M. DeBolt, Ryan Fulgam, Ethan W. Emerson, and Delphine K. Farmer

Viewed

Total article views: 882 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
671 185 26 882 69 15 17
  • HTML: 671
  • PDF: 185
  • XML: 26
  • Total: 882
  • Supplement: 69
  • BibTeX: 15
  • EndNote: 17
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Aug 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Aug 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 893 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 893 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Mar 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
We present particle flux and size-resolved dry deposition measurements from a pine forest for all four major seasons. Dry deposition of particles was highest in the winter and was significantly elevated compared to the summer data. Several mechanisms were investigated to determine what effects were driving the enhanced deposition in the winter. We show that the wintertime changes are likely caused by changes in plant physiology and needle structure that increase the influence of interception.
Altmetrics