the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Seasonal characteristics of atmospheric formaldehyde (HCHO) in a coastal city of southeast China: Formation mechanism and photochemical effects
Abstract. Formaldehyde (HCHO) is a vital reactive carbonyl compound, which plays a critical role in the atmospheric oxidation capacity (AOC), radical chemistry, and O3 formation. Yet, the majority of the current studies on HCHO photochemical mechanism in coastal areas remain scarce, thus limiting the full understanding of potential atmospheric impacts with limited influence from marine sources. Here, field campaigns were conducted at a typical urban site in southeast China to reveal the characteristics and potential source of ambient HCHO, as well as its impact on photochemistry, during spring and autumn of 2021. The result showed that the HCHO mixing ratios were 2.94±1.28 ppbv and 3.19±1.41 ppbv in spring and autumn, respectively. Secondary formation made the largest contributions to HCHO (49 % in spring and 46 % in autumn), followed by vehicle exhaust (25 % and 20 %) and biogenic emission (18 % and 24 %) in this study. Furthermore, in order to identity the impact of HCHO on photochemistry process, the formation pathways and key precursors (alkenes and aromatics) of secondary HCHO were furtherly investigated based on Observation-Based Model (OBM). The net HCHO production rate in autumn (−0.40±0.70 ppbv h−1) was lower than that in spring (0.10±0.37 ppbv h−1), due to the increase in HCHO loss rate under the intense solar radiation and relatively low precursor levels to limited HCHO secondary formation. Disabling HCHO mechanism decreased the abundance of OH (25 % in spring and 16 % in autumn), HO2 (45 %, 40 %), and RO2 (26 %, 19 %). Meanwhile, the net O3 production rates dropped by 32 % in spring and 29 % in autumn, which were mainly dominated by the reduction of radical propagation efficiencies. The analysis of HCHO potential sources, formation pathways, and impacts on O3 formation provided significant insights into photochemical mechanisms and pollution control in coastal areas.
- Preprint
(1780 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(678 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-292', Chunxiang Ye, 06 Jun 2022
General comments:
This manuscript reported relatively comprehensive measurements of HCHO, HONO, PAN, NOx, GC-FID/MS VOCs etc in city of Xiamen in Southeast China and presented source appointment analysis of HCHO by PMF model and simulation of oxidative capacity of the atmosphere by chemical model. First of all, I personally for now can not accept the PMF model source appointment of a relative short-lived species of multiple sources, like HCHO. This point surely needs further discussion. For example, the author can provide justification of the method, which is not available in current manuscript. Secondly, scientific motivation and measurement validation, or at least uncertainty analysis are two lost parts in discussion of the chemical model simulation. Otherwise, the result might appear to be of local interests or not robust, which is out of the scope of ACP journal.
Specific comments
I I found some puzzled statement. For example,
In line 19ï¼The author emphasis experiment design in a coastal area. However, what is special for this area? Any implication for general coastal area from this dataset?
In line 18-19: whether measurements of HCHO is scare or not?
I would say the role of HCHO in radical chemistry is relative well accepted. If the author suggest otherwise, what is new in the understanding of this subject from your data?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-292-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-292/acp-2022-292-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on acp-2022-292', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Jun 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-292/acp-2022-292-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-292/acp-2022-292-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
Status: closed
-
RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-292', Chunxiang Ye, 06 Jun 2022
General comments:
This manuscript reported relatively comprehensive measurements of HCHO, HONO, PAN, NOx, GC-FID/MS VOCs etc in city of Xiamen in Southeast China and presented source appointment analysis of HCHO by PMF model and simulation of oxidative capacity of the atmosphere by chemical model. First of all, I personally for now can not accept the PMF model source appointment of a relative short-lived species of multiple sources, like HCHO. This point surely needs further discussion. For example, the author can provide justification of the method, which is not available in current manuscript. Secondly, scientific motivation and measurement validation, or at least uncertainty analysis are two lost parts in discussion of the chemical model simulation. Otherwise, the result might appear to be of local interests or not robust, which is out of the scope of ACP journal.
Specific comments
I I found some puzzled statement. For example,
In line 19ï¼The author emphasis experiment design in a coastal area. However, what is special for this area? Any implication for general coastal area from this dataset?
In line 18-19: whether measurements of HCHO is scare or not?
I would say the role of HCHO in radical chemistry is relative well accepted. If the author suggest otherwise, what is new in the understanding of this subject from your data?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-292-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-292/acp-2022-292-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on acp-2022-292', Anonymous Referee #2, 07 Jun 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-292/acp-2022-292-RC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-292/acp-2022-292-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jinsheng Chen, 20 Jul 2022
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
883 | 267 | 38 | 1,188 | 96 | 32 | 46 |
- HTML: 883
- PDF: 267
- XML: 38
- Total: 1,188
- Supplement: 96
- BibTeX: 32
- EndNote: 46
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1