Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-960
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-960
27 Oct 2020
 | 27 Oct 2020
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Departure from K-theory in the planetary boundary layer

Pedro Santos, Alfredo Peña, and Jakob Mann

Abstract. It is well known that when eddies are small, the eddy fluxes can be directly related to the mean vertical gradients, the so-called K-theory, but such relation becomes weaker the larger the coherent structures. Here, we show that this relation does not hold at heights relevant for wind energy applications. The relation implies that the angle (β) between the vector of vertical flux of horizontal momentum and the vector of the mean vertical gradient of horizontal velocity is zero, i.e., the vectors are aligned. This is not what we observe from measurements performed both offshore and onshore. We quantify the misalignment of β using measurements from a long-range Doppler profiling lidar and large-eddy simulations. We also use mesoscale model output from the New European Wind Atlas project to compare with the lidar-observed vertical profiles of wind speed, wind direction, momentum fluxes, and the angle between the horizontal velocity vector and the momentum flux vector up to 500 m both offshore and onshore, hence covering the rotor areas of modern wind turbines and beyond. The results show that within the range 100–500 m, β = −18° offshore and β = 12° onshore, on average. However, the large-eddy simulations show β ≈ 0°, partly confirming previous modeling results. We illustrate that mesoscale model output matches the observed mean wind speed and momentum fluxes well, but that this model output has significant deviations with the observations when looking at the turning of the wind.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
Pedro Santos, Alfredo Peña, and Jakob Mann

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Pedro Santos, Alfredo Peña, and Jakob Mann
Pedro Santos, Alfredo Peña, and Jakob Mann

Viewed

Total article views: 909 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
589 278 42 909 37 43
  • HTML: 589
  • PDF: 278
  • XML: 42
  • Total: 909
  • BibTeX: 37
  • EndNote: 43
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Oct 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,066 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,063 with geography defined and 3 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Short summary
We show that the vector of vertical flux of horizontal momentum and the vector of the mean vertical gradient of horizontal velocity are not aligned, based on Doppler wind lidar observations up to 500 m, both offshore and onshore. We illustrate that a mesoscale model output matches the observed mean wind speed and momentum fluxes well, but that this model output as well as idealized large-eddy simulations have deviations with the observations when looking at the turning of the wind.
Altmetrics