Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-33583-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-33583-2015
27 Nov 2015
 | 27 Nov 2015
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

Observationally-constrained carbonaceous aerosol source estimates for the Pearl River Delta area of China

N. Li, T.-M. Fu, J. J. Cao, J. Y. Zheng, Q. Y. He, X. Long, Z. Z. Zhao, N. Y. Cao, J. S. Fu, and Y. F. Lam

Abstract. We simulated elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) aerosols over the Pearl River Delta (PRD) area of China and compared the results to seasonal surface measurements, with the aim of quantifying carbonaceous aerosol sources from a "top-down" perspective. Our regional model was driven by current-best estimates of PRD EC (39.5 Gg C yr−1) and OC (32.8 Gg C yr−1) emissions and included updated secondary organic aerosol formation pathways. The simulated annual mean EC and OC concentrations were 4.0 and 7.7 μg C m−3, respectively, lower than the observed annual mean EC and OC concentrations (4.5 and 13.1 μg C m−3, respectively). We used multiple regression to match the simulated EC against seasonal mean observations. The resulting top-down estimate for EC emission in the PRD area was 52.9 ± 8.0 Gg C yr−1. We estimated the OC emission in the PRD area to be 60.2 ± 10.3 Gg C yr−1, based on the top-down EC emission estimate and the primary OC / EC ratios derived from bottom-up statistics. Using these top-down emission estimates, the simulated average annual mean EC and OC concentrations were improved to 4.4 and 9.5 μg C m−3, respectively, closer to the observations. Secondary sources accounted for 42 % of annual mean surface OC in our top-down simulations, with biogenic VOCs being the most important precursors.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
N. Li, T.-M. Fu, J. J. Cao, J. Y. Zheng, Q. Y. He, X. Long, Z. Z. Zhao, N. Y. Cao, J. S. Fu, and Y. F. Lam
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
N. Li, T.-M. Fu, J. J. Cao, J. Y. Zheng, Q. Y. He, X. Long, Z. Z. Zhao, N. Y. Cao, J. S. Fu, and Y. F. Lam
N. Li, T.-M. Fu, J. J. Cao, J. Y. Zheng, Q. Y. He, X. Long, Z. Z. Zhao, N. Y. Cao, J. S. Fu, and Y. F. Lam

Viewed

Total article views: 1,897 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,408 373 116 1,897 226 82 107
  • HTML: 1,408
  • PDF: 373
  • XML: 116
  • Total: 1,897
  • Supplement: 226
  • BibTeX: 82
  • EndNote: 107
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Nov 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Nov 2015)

Cited

Latest update: 11 Jul 2024
Download
Altmetrics