Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-8585-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-8585-2013
02 Apr 2013
 | 02 Apr 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

Evaluation of various methods to measure particulate bound mercury and associated artifacts

S. Wang, T. M. Holsen, J. Huang, and Y.-J. Han

Abstract. This study was performed to determine how sampling artifacts associated with various sampling methods including open faced filter (OFF) pack, micro orifice uniform deposit impactor (MOUDI), and Tekran speciation system (TekSpec) impact particulate bound mercury (PBM) measurements. PBM measured by the MOUDI for 48 h was statistically lower than that measured with the TekSpec every 2 h, indicating that negative artifacts were significant for long sampling durations. Negative artifacts were also identified in lab experiments as the Hg0 and HgCl2 concentrations associated with particulate matter on the filter significantly decreased when the filter was exposed to zero air. Positive artifacts were also investigated. The OFF sampling for 48 h, which is likely to be associated with both positive and negative artifacts, measured a significantly lower PBM concentration than the TekSpec while the OFF and MOUDI (48 h sampling – minimal positive artifacts) showed similar results, suggesting that positive artifacts were minor under the rural condition encountered (low atmospheric gaseous oxidized mercury and typical oxidants concentrations). The Hg speciation associated with particles varied with atmospheric temperature, with the contribution of less volatile species including HgO and HgS increasing and more volatile Hg0 and HgCl2 decreasing as atmospheric temperature increased. There was significant correlation for PBM larger than 2.5 μm between TekSpec frit and MOUDI in this study, indicating that TekSpec frit is a good alternative sampler for measuring the concentration of coarse PBM.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
S. Wang, T. M. Holsen, J. Huang, and Y.-J. Han
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
S. Wang, T. M. Holsen, J. Huang, and Y.-J. Han
S. Wang, T. M. Holsen, J. Huang, and Y.-J. Han

Viewed

Total article views: 2,843 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,384 1,292 167 2,843 139 137
  • HTML: 1,384
  • PDF: 1,292
  • XML: 167
  • Total: 2,843
  • BibTeX: 139
  • EndNote: 137
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Apr 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Apr 2013)

Cited

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics