Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-23295-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-23295-2013
05 Sep 2013
 | 05 Sep 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

Satellite-based estimate of aerosol direct radiative effect over the South-East Atlantic

L. Costantino and F.-M. Bréon

Abstract. The net effect of aerosol Direct Radiative Forcing (DRF) is the balance between the scattering effect that reflects solar radiation back to space (cooling), and the absorption that decreases the reflected sunlight (warming). The amplitude of these two effects and their balance depends on the aerosol load, its absorptivity, the cloud fraction and the respective position of aerosol and cloud layers.

In this study, we use the information provided by CALIOP (CALIPSO satellite) and MODIS (AQUA satellite) instruments as input data to a Rapid Radiative Transfer Model (RRTM) and quantify the shortwave (SW) aerosol direct atmospheric forcing, over the South-East Atlantic. The combination of the passive and active measurements allows estimates of the horizontal and vertical distributions of the aerosol and cloud parameters. We use a parametrization of the Single Scattering Albedo (SSA) based on the satellite-derived Angstrom coefficient.

The South East Atlantic is a particular region, where bright stratocumulus clouds are often topped by absorbing smoke particles. Results from radiative transfer simulations confirm the similar amplitude of the cooling effect, due to light scattering by the aerosols, and the warming effect, due to the absorption by the same particles. Over six years of satellite retrievals, from 2005 to 2010, the South-East Atlantic all-sky SW DRF is −0.03 W m−2, with a spatial standard deviation of 8.03 W m−2. In good agreement with previous estimates, statistics show that a cloud fraction larger than 0.5 is generally associated with positive all-sky DRF. In case of cloudy-sky and aerosol located only above the cloud top, a SSA larger than 0.91 and cloud optical thickness larger than 4 can be considered as threshold values, beyond which the resulting radiative forcing becomes positive.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
L. Costantino and F.-M. Bréon
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
L. Costantino and F.-M. Bréon
L. Costantino and F.-M. Bréon

Viewed

Total article views: 2,488 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,491 861 136 2,488 124 121
  • HTML: 1,491
  • PDF: 861
  • XML: 136
  • Total: 2,488
  • BibTeX: 124
  • EndNote: 121
Views and downloads (calculated since 05 Sep 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 05 Sep 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics