Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-14405-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-14405-2013
03 Jun 2013
 | 03 Jun 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

Comparing the cloud vertical structure derived from several methods based on measured atmospheric profiles and active surface measurements

M. Costa-Surós, J. Calbó, J. A. González, and C. N. Long

Abstract. The cloud vertical distribution and especially the cloud base height, which is linked to cloud type, is an important characteristic in order to describe the impact of clouds in a changing climate. In this work several methods to estimate the cloud vertical structure (CVS) based on atmospheric sounding profiles are compared, considering number and position of cloud layers, with a ground based system which is taken as a reference: the Active Remote Sensing of Clouds (ARSCL). All methods establish some conditions on the relative humidity, and differ on the use of other variables, the thresholds applied, or the vertical resolution of the profile. In this study these methods are applied to 125 radiosonde profiles acquired at the ARM Southern Great Plains site during all seasons of year 2009 and endorsed by GOES images, to confirm that the cloudiness conditions are homogeneous enough across their trajectory. The overall agreement for the methods ranges between 44–88%; four methods produce total agreements around 85%. Further tests and improvements are applied on one of these methods. In addition, we attempt to make this method suitable for low resolution vertical profiles, which could be useful in atmospheric modeling. The total agreement, even when using low resolution profiles, can be improved up to 91% if the thresholds for a moist layer to become a cloud layer are modified to minimize false negatives with the current data set, thus improving overall agreement.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
M. Costa-Surós, J. Calbó, J. A. González, and C. N. Long
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
M. Costa-Surós, J. Calbó, J. A. González, and C. N. Long
M. Costa-Surós, J. Calbó, J. A. González, and C. N. Long

Viewed

Total article views: 2,505 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,740 590 175 2,505 100 121
  • HTML: 1,740
  • PDF: 590
  • XML: 175
  • Total: 2,505
  • BibTeX: 100
  • EndNote: 121
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jun 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics