Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-11395-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-13-11395-2013
29 Apr 2013
 | 29 Apr 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

Stratospheric SO2 and sulphate aerosol, model simulations and satellite observations

C. Brühl, J. Lelieveld, M. Höpfner, and H. Tost

Abstract. A multiyear study with the atmospheric chemistry general circulation model EMAC with the aerosol module GMXe at high altitude resolution demonstrates that the sulfur gases COS and SO2, the latter from low-latitude volcanic eruptions, predominantly control the formation of stratospheric aerosol. The model consistently uses the same parameters in the troposphere and stratosphere for 7 aerosol modes applied. Lower boundary conditions for COS and other long-lived trace gases are taken from measurement networks, while estimates of volcanic SO2 emissions are based on satellite observations. We show comparisons with satellite data for aerosol extinction (e.g. SAGE) and SO2 in the middle atmosphere (MIPAS on ENVISAT). This corroborates the interannual variability induced by the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, which is internally generated by the model. The model also realistically simulates the radiative effects of stratospheric and tropospheric aerosol including the effects on the model dynamics. The medium strength volcanic eruptions of 2005 and 2006 exerted a nonnegligible radiative forcing of up to −0.6 W m−2 in the tropics, while the large Pinatubo eruption caused a maximum though short term tropical forcing of about −10 W m−2. The study also shows that observed upper stratospheric SO2 can be simulated accurately only when a sulphur sink on meteoritic dust is included and the photolysis of gaseous H2SO4 in the near infrared is higher than assumed previously.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
C. Brühl, J. Lelieveld, M. Höpfner, and H. Tost
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
C. Brühl, J. Lelieveld, M. Höpfner, and H. Tost
C. Brühl, J. Lelieveld, M. Höpfner, and H. Tost

Viewed

Total article views: 3,240 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,392 724 124 3,240 107 103
  • HTML: 2,392
  • PDF: 724
  • XML: 124
  • Total: 3,240
  • BibTeX: 107
  • EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Apr 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download
Altmetrics