the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Are black carbon and soot the same?
Abstract. The climate change and environmental literature, including that on aerosols, is replete with mention of black carbon (BC), but neither reliable samples nor standards exist. Thus, there is uncertainty about its exact nature. That confusion can be avoided if terms are defined and widely understood. Here we discuss an ambiguity between BC and soot and propose a more precise definition for soot as a specific material, which we call ns-soot, where "ns" refers to carbon nanospheres. We define ns-soot as particles that consist of nanospheres, typically with diameters < 100 nm, that possess distinct structures of concentrically wrapped, graphene-like layers of carbon and with grape-like (acinoform) morphologies. We additionally propose that, because of their importance for climate modeling and health issues, distinctions are made among bare, coated, and embedded ns-soot. BC, on the other hand, is not a well-defined material. We propose that the term should be restricted to light-absorbing refractory carbonaceous matter of uncertain character and that the uncertainty is stated explicitly.
- Preprint
(1688 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
SC C7311: 'EC or elemental carbon', Kim Prather, 23 Sep 2012
-
AC C8302: 'Reply to comment by Kim Prather', Peter Buseck, 18 Oct 2012
-
AC C8302: 'Reply to comment by Kim Prather', Peter Buseck, 18 Oct 2012
-
RC C8423: 'Flags ambiguous usage, but doesn’t provide an acceptable solution', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Oct 2012
-
AC C8795: 'Reply to comment by Anonymous Referee #1', Peter Buseck, 30 Oct 2012
-
AC C8795: 'Reply to comment by Anonymous Referee #1', Peter Buseck, 30 Oct 2012
-
RC C9054: 'Cleaning up Definitions of Black Carbon and Soot', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Nov 2012
-
AC C10060: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
AC C10060: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
SC C9099: 'Interactive comment on “Are black carbon and soot the same?” by P. R. Buseck et al.: Disagreement on proposed nomenclature', Stephen E. Schwartz, 07 Nov 2012
-
AC C10066: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
AC C10066: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
SC C9448: 'Some more thoughts and clarifications', Martin Gysel, 16 Nov 2012
-
AC C9955: 'Reply to comment by M. Gysel', Peter Buseck, 29 Nov 2012
-
AC C9955: 'Reply to comment by M. Gysel', Peter Buseck, 29 Nov 2012
-
SC C7311: 'EC or elemental carbon', Kim Prather, 23 Sep 2012
-
AC C8302: 'Reply to comment by Kim Prather', Peter Buseck, 18 Oct 2012
-
AC C8302: 'Reply to comment by Kim Prather', Peter Buseck, 18 Oct 2012
-
RC C8423: 'Flags ambiguous usage, but doesn’t provide an acceptable solution', Anonymous Referee #1, 19 Oct 2012
-
AC C8795: 'Reply to comment by Anonymous Referee #1', Peter Buseck, 30 Oct 2012
-
AC C8795: 'Reply to comment by Anonymous Referee #1', Peter Buseck, 30 Oct 2012
-
RC C9054: 'Cleaning up Definitions of Black Carbon and Soot', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Nov 2012
-
AC C10060: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
AC C10060: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
SC C9099: 'Interactive comment on “Are black carbon and soot the same?” by P. R. Buseck et al.: Disagreement on proposed nomenclature', Stephen E. Schwartz, 07 Nov 2012
-
AC C10066: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
AC C10066: 'Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #2 and to Schwartz and Lewis', Peter Buseck, 03 Dec 2012
-
SC C9448: 'Some more thoughts and clarifications', Martin Gysel, 16 Nov 2012
-
AC C9955: 'Reply to comment by M. Gysel', Peter Buseck, 29 Nov 2012
-
AC C9955: 'Reply to comment by M. Gysel', Peter Buseck, 29 Nov 2012
Viewed
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,971 | 4,769 | 233 | 9,973 | 187 | 240 |
- HTML: 4,971
- PDF: 4,769
- XML: 233
- Total: 9,973
- BibTeX: 187
- EndNote: 240