Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-6341-2010
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-10-6341-2010
08 Mar 2010
 | 08 Mar 2010
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal ACP but the revision was not accepted.

Aerosol effects on deep convective clouds: impact of changes in aerosol size distribution and aerosol activation parameterization

A. M. L. Ekman, A. Engström, and A. Söderberg

Abstract. A cloud-resolving model including explicit aerosol physics and chemistry is used to study the impact of aerosols on deep convective strength. More specifically, by conducting six sensitivity series we examine how the complexity of the aerosol model, the size of the aerosols and the aerosol activation parameterization influence the aerosol-induced deep convective cloud sensitivity. Only aerosol effects on liquid droplet formation are considered. We find that an increased aerosol concentration generally results in stronger convection, which for the simulated case is in agreement with the conceptual model presented by Rosenfeld et al. (2008). However, there are two sensitivity series that do not display a monotonic increase in updraft velocity with increasing aerosol concentration. These exceptions illustrate the need to: 1) account for changes in evaporation processes and subsequent cooling when assessing aerosol effects on deep convective strength, 2) better understand graupel impaction scavenging of aerosols which may limit the number of CCN at a critical stage of cloud development and thereby dampen the convection, 3) increase our knowledge of aerosol recycling due to evaporation of cloud droplets. Furthermore, we find a significant difference in the aerosol-induced deep convective cloud sensitivity when using different complexities of the aerosol model and different aerosol activation parameterizations. For the simulated case, a 100% increase in aerosol concentration results in a difference in average updraft between the various sensitivity series which is as large as the average updraft increase itself. The model simulations also show that the change in graupel and rain formation is not necessarily directly proportional to the change in updraft velocity. For example, several of the sensitivity series display a decrease of the rain amount at the lowest model level with increasing updraft velocity. Finally, an increased number of aerosols in the Aitken mode (here defined by 23 nm≤d≤100.0 nm) may result in a larger impact on the convective strength compared to an increased number of aerosols in the accumulation mode (here defined by 100 nm≤d≤900.0 nm). When accumulation mode aerosols are activated and grow at the beginning of the cloud cycle, the supersaturation near the cloud base is lowered which to some extent limits further aerosol activation.

A. M. L. Ekman, A. Engström, and A. Söderberg
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
A. M. L. Ekman, A. Engström, and A. Söderberg
A. M. L. Ekman, A. Engström, and A. Söderberg

Viewed

Total article views: 1,331 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
927 281 123 1,331 122 109
  • HTML: 927
  • PDF: 281
  • XML: 123
  • Total: 1,331
  • BibTeX: 122
  • EndNote: 109
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2013)

Saved

Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Download
Altmetrics