Articles | Volume 14, issue 4
Research article
27 Feb 2014
Research article |  | 27 Feb 2014

Aerosols and nucleation in eastern China: first insights from the new SORPES-NJU station

E. Herrmann, A. J. Ding, V.-M. Kerminen, T. Petäjä, X. Q. Yang, J. N. Sun, X. M. Qi, H. Manninen, J. Hakala, T. Nieminen, P. P. Aalto, M. Kulmala, and C. B. Fu

Abstract. Aerosols and new particle formation were studied in the western part of the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) at the Station for Observing Regional Processes of the Earth System, Nanjing University (SORPES-NJU). Air ions in the diameter range 0.8–42 nm were measured using an air ion spectrometer, and a differential mobility particle sizer (DMPS) provided particle number size distributions between 6 and 800 nm. Additionally, meteorological data, trace gas concentrations, and PM2.5 values were recorded. During the measurement period from 18 November 2011 to 31 March 2012, the mean total particle concentration was found to be 23 000 cm−3 and the mean PM2.5 value was 90 μg m−3, well above national limits. We observed 26 new particle formation events occurred during the measurement period, producing 6 nm particles at a rate of about 1 cm−3 s−1. Typical particle growth rates were between 6 and 7 nm h−1. On average, new particle formation and growth were estimated to enhance cloud condensation nuclei concentration by about a factor of two during these event days. Ion measurements showed the typical cluster band below 2 nm, with total ion concentrations between about 600 and 1000 cm−3. A peculiar feature of the ion measurements were heightened ion cluster concentrations during the nights before the event days. At 2 nm, the formation rate of charged particles was only about 0.2% of the total rate, pointing towards an only marginal role of ion-induced nucleation. Based on observations, a simple empirical criterion was deducted to estimate particle formation probability. Dominated by radiation and relative humidity, the criterion can predict the occurrence of particle formation with a 90% accuracy. In a similar fashion, a reasonably accurate estimate of particle formation rates was derived. Combined, these parameters allow for a description of particle formation based on a few basic measured variables.

Final-revised paper