Articles | Volume 10, issue 12
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5759–5783, 2010

Special issue: EMEP – an integrated system of models and observations...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5759–5783, 2010

  30 Jun 2010

30 Jun 2010

A multi-model analysis of vertical ozone profiles

J. E. Jonson1, A. Stohl2, A. M. Fiore3, P. Hess4, S. Szopa5, O. Wild6, G. Zeng7,*, F. J. Dentener8, A. Lupu9, M. G. Schultz10, B. N. Duncan11, K. Sudo12, P. Wind1, M. Schulz5, E. Marmer8, C. Cuvelier8, T. Keating13, A. Zuber14, A. Valdebenito1, V. Dorokhov15, H. De Backer16, J. Davies17, G. H. Chen18, B. Johnson19, D. W. Tarasick17, R. Stübi20, M.J. Newchurch21, P. von der Gathen22, W. Steinbrecht23, and H. Claude23 J. E. Jonson et al.
  • 1Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Oslo, Norway
  • 2NILU, Kjeller, Norway
  • 3Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, NOAA, Princeton, NJ, USA
  • 4National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 5Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA/CNRS/UVSQ/IPSL, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 6Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, UK
  • 7Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Cambridge, UK
  • 8European Commission, DG-Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, Italy
  • 9Center for research in Earth and Space Science, York University, Canada
  • 10ICG-2, Forchungszentrum-Julich, Germany
  • 11NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
  • 12Grad. School of Environ. Studies, Nagoya University, Japan
  • 13Office of Policy Analysis and Review, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA
  • 14Environment Directorate General, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium
  • 15Central Aerological Observatory, Moscow, Russia
  • 16Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium (R.M.I.B.), Brussels, Belgium
  • 17Environmental Canada, Downsview, Canada
  • 18Central Weather Bureau, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 19NOAA/ESRL, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 20Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology, MeteoSwiss, Payerne, Switzerland
  • 21Atmospheric Science Department, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA
  • 22Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research, Telegrafenberg A43, 14473 Potsdam, Germany
  • 23Met. Obs. Hohenpeissenberg, German Weather Service (DWD), Germany
  • *now at: National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Lauder, New Zealand

Abstract. A multi-model study of the long-range transport of ozone and its precursors from major anthropogenic source regions was coordinated by the Task Force on Hemispheric Transport of Air Pollution (TF HTAP) under the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). Vertical profiles of ozone at 12-h intervals from 2001 are available from twelve of the models contributing to this study and are compared here with observed profiles from ozonesondes. The contributions from each major source region are analysed for selected sondes, and this analysis is supplemented by retroplume calculations using the FLEXPART Lagrangian particle dispersion model to provide insight into the origin of ozone transport events and the cause of differences between the models and observations.

In the boundary layer ozone levels are in general strongly affected by regional sources and sinks. With a considerably longer lifetime in the free troposphere, ozone here is to a much larger extent affected by processes on a larger scale such as intercontinental transport and exchange with the stratosphere. Such individual events are difficult to trace over several days or weeks of transport. This may explain why statistical relationships between models and ozonesonde measurements are far less satisfactory than shown in previous studies for surface measurements at all seasons. The lowest bias between model-calculated ozone profiles and the ozonesonde measurements is seen in the winter and autumn months. Following the increase in photochemical activity in the spring and summer months, the spread in model results increases, and the agreement between ozonesonde measurements and the individual models deteriorates further.

At selected sites calculated contributions to ozone levels in the free troposphere from intercontinental transport are shown. Intercontinental transport is identified based on differences in model calculations with unperturbed emissions and emissions reduced by 20% by region. Intercontinental transport of ozone is finally determined based on differences in model ensemble calculations. With emissions perturbed by 20% per region, calculated intercontinental contributions to ozone in the free troposphere range from less than 1 ppb to 3 ppb, with small contributions in winter. The results are corroborated by the retroplume calculations. At several locations the seasonal contributions to ozone in the free troposphere from intercontinental transport differ from what was shown earlier at the surface using the same dataset. The large spread in model results points to a need of further evaluation of the chemical and physical processes in order to improve the credibility of global model results.

Final-revised paper