the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Urban morphology modulates thunderstorm process and associatied cloud-to-ground lightning activity over Beijing metropolitan region
Abstract. The effect of urban barriers may have a significant impact on the patterns of thunderstorm processes and lightning activity, but there is still a lack of comprehensive mechanical explanations. The observational analysis carried out in this study found that cloud-to-ground (CG) lighting activity tends to cluster around the outer boundaries of the mega cities, while, on the opposite, CG gathers within the small-sized city. When a squall line originating from a type of mesoscale convective system (MCS) known as '0713' passed through the built-up area, the barrier effect of the rough underlying surface contributed to the separation of the cold pool. This led to weakening of vertical airflow and breaking of the convergence line, ultimately triggering the bifurcation of the thunderstorm. Simulation results complement these observations. When buildings outside the 5 Ring Road (RR) are replaced with bare soil, the separation of the cold pool is minimized. Furthermore, the density of the buildings also influenced the strength of the barrier effect. Therefore, the specific urban morphologies were identified as a critical factor in modulating cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning activity and the organization process of thunderstorms. This study offers a fundamental foundation and technical support for predicting and assessing urban cloud-to-ground (CG) lightning risks. It holds significant implications for understanding excess urban warming, its prediction and assessment, and the resulting thermal risk, influenced by factors such as ventilation, sea breezes, and the geophysical environment in coastal cities.
- Preprint
(2387 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on acp-2024-3', Anonymous Referee #1, 23 Apr 2024
This study analyzed the impact of urban areas on thunderstorm organization processes and CG flash activity through ground observations and numerical simulations. City size may be an important factor affecting thunderstorm processes. In addition, the building density may also alter the organization process of thunderstorms. Overall, I believe that the research presented in this article has some innovation and the conclusions are also very interesting. The organization and writing of this article need improvement, and I would like to suggest significant revisions to this paper.Â
1. The author has failed to define a thunderstorm that is grounded in radar reflectivity or other pertinent parameters, leaving the reader without a clear understanding of the term's scientific context.
2. This article highlights a specific thunderstorm process that exhibited a barrier effect through both observations and simulations. However, to strengthen the argument that this phenomenon is widespread or common, the author should provide additional cases or statistical results to support their findings.
3. Has Figure 3 exclusively analyzed CG events that occurred during the summer? If so, please include a relevant description in the caption of Figure 3. Furthermore, the author should provide a clear description of the data in the data section.
4. Please add the symbolization of the red line in Figure 8.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2024-3-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yuanjian Yang, 12 Aug 2024
Dear Reviewer and Editors:
Â
We are sincerely grateful to the editor and reviewer for their valuable time for reviewing our manuscript. The comments are very helpful and valuable, and we have addressed the issues raised by the reviewer in the revised manuscript. Please find our point-by-point response (in blue text) to the comments (in black text) raised by the reviewer. We have revised the paper according to your comments (highlighted in red text of the revised manuscript).
Â
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Yuanjian Yang, representing all co-authors
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Yuanjian Yang, 12 Aug 2024
-
RC2: 'Comment on acp-2024-3', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Jul 2024
Overall Review:
This manuscript examines lightning location data, along with a numerical model, which indicates that urban morphology in Beijing's metropolitan area influences where lightning strikes—a phenomenon known as the urban barrier effect. By integrating lightning data with a model that considers building size and height, the manuscript presents interesting case studies demonstrating how large cities can influence weather conditions, thus affecting lightning patterns. However, the manuscript lacks sufficient clarity in its data presentation, methodological approach and structural hierarchy, causing confusion for readers. After addressing my primary comments, I recommend publishing this manuscript in ACP.
Â
Major comments:
- Figure 1 provides an overview of the study area, encompassing the boundaries and spatial locations of China, Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, and Beijing. However, as the focus of this study is the urban area of Beijing, Figure 1 lacks a sufficiently detailed depiction. While Figure 2 offers some insight, I believe it is crucial to supplement Figure 1 with more specific information about the urban area of Beijing.
Â
- The observation section of this article has obtained many interesting statistical results based on compact high rise, compact mid rise, compact low rise, open high rise, open mid rise, and open low rise. However, sensitivity tests were conducted in the simulation section based on compact rise and open rise, and the test results to some extent explained the mechanism of the influence of urban morphology on the process of thunderstorm organization. What are the standards used for the classification of urban morphology in the observation and simulation sections? Is it consistent? Please provide a detailed explanation.
Â
- Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) serves as a vital tool in this paper for analyzing the mechanisms of how urban morphology impacts the thunderstorm process. However, the author's introduction to WRF lacks sufficient detail, especially regarding the WRF model coupled with the urban canopy, which poses challenges for researchers unfamiliar with this system. The author should provide a more comprehensive explanation of WRF and the simulation scheme to enhance the readability of the paper and ensure the reproducibility of the experimental results.
Â
Minor comments:
Â
P1Line15: "mega cities", should be "megacities"
Â
P1Line18: "weakening" should be preceded by "the"
Â
P1Line30: "population" should be revised as "populations"
Â
P2Line45: "that" in "....despite that....." should be deleted
Â
P2Line49: "millions" Â -> Â "million"
Â
P2Line61: "built up" Â -> Â "built-up"
Â
P2Line67: What does "BJ" mean? Is Beijing an abbreviation?
Â
P2Line67: "sof" may be "of"
Â
P4Line96: "refers" Â -> Â "refer"
Â
P6Line118: deleted "the" in "....the Table 2....."
Â
P6Line125: deleted "the" in "....the Table 3....."
Â
P8Line141: "an average and maximum densities" Â -> Â "an average and maximum density"
Â
P8Line145: "exists a potential" has one more space
Â
P9Line146: "by high" should be added "a"
Â
P12Line203: "during "0713" case" should be added "the"
Â
P18Line305: "all types of building" should be "all types of buildings"
Â
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2024-3-RC2 -
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Yuanjian Yang, 12 Aug 2024
Dear Reviewer and Editors:
Â
We are sincerely grateful to the editor and reviewer for their valuable time for reviewing our manuscript. The comments are very helpful and valuable, and we have addressed the issues raised by the reviewer in the revised manuscript. Please find our point-by-point response (in blue text) to the comments (in black text) raised by the reviewer. We have revised the paper according to your comments (highlighted in red text of the revised manuscript).
Â
Sincerely yours,
Dr. Yuanjian Yang, representing all co-authors
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
346 | 97 | 32 | 475 | 24 | 20 |
- HTML: 346
- PDF: 97
- XML: 32
- Total: 475
- BibTeX: 24
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1