Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-97
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-97
 
09 Mar 2022
09 Mar 2022
Status: a revised version of this preprint is currently under review for the journal ACP.

The Dependence of Aerosols’ Global and Local Precipitation Impacts on Emitting Region

Geeta Persad Geeta Persad
  • Department of Geological Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712 USA

Abstract. The influence of aerosol emissions’ geographic distribution on the magnitude and spatial pattern of their precipitation impacts remains poorly understood. In this study, the NCAR CESM1 global climate model is used in coupled atmosphere-slab ocean mode to simulate the global hydrological cycle response to a fixed amount and composition of aerosol emitted from 8 key source regions. The results indicate that the location of aerosol emissions is a strong determinant of both the magnitude and spatial distribution of the hydrological response. The global-mean precipitation response to aerosol emissions is found to vary over a six-fold range depending solely on source location. Mid-latitude sources generate larger global-mean precipitation responses than do tropical and sub-tropical sources, driven largely by the formers’ stronger global-mean temperature influence. However, the spatial distribution of precipitation responses to some (largely tropical and sub-tropical) regional emissions are almost entirely localized within the source region, while responses to other (primarily mid-latitude) regional emissions are almost entirely remote. It is proposed that this diversity arises from the differing strength with which each regional emission generates fast precipitation responses that remain largely localized. The findings highlight that tropical regions are particularly susceptible to hydrological cycle change from either local or remote aerosol emissions, encourage greater investigation of the processes controlling localization of the precipitation response to regional aerosols, and demonstrate that the geographic distribution of anthropogenic aerosol emissions must be considered when estimating their hydrological impacts.

Geeta Persad

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-97', Anonymous Referee #1, 20 Mar 2022
    • AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Geeta Persad, 10 May 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on acp-2022-97', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Apr 2022
    • AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Geeta Persad, 10 May 2022

Geeta Persad

Geeta Persad

Viewed

Total article views: 357 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
272 71 14 357 4 5
  • HTML: 272
  • PDF: 71
  • XML: 14
  • Total: 357
  • BibTeX: 4
  • EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 09 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 09 Mar 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 337 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 26 May 2022
Download
Short summary
Human-induced aerosol pollution has major impacts on both local and global precipitation. This study demonstrates using a global climate model that both the strength and localization of aerosols’ precipitation impacts are highly dependent on which region the aerosols are emitted from. The findings highlight that the geographic distribution of human-induced aerosol emissions must be accounted for when quantifying their influence on global precipitation.
Altmetrics