Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-835
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-835
 
20 Dec 2022
20 Dec 2022
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ACP.

Influence of cloud microphysics schemes on weather model predictions of heavy precipitation

Gregor Köcher1, Tobias Zinner1, and Christoph Knote1,2 Gregor Köcher et al.
  • 1Meteorologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany
  • 2Medizinische Fakultät, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

Abstract. Cloud microphysics is one of the major sources of uncertainty in numerical weather prediction models. In this work, the ability of a numerical weather prediction model to correctly predict high-impact weather events, i.e., hail and heavy rain, using different cloud microphysics schemes is evaluated statistically. Polarimetric C-band radar observations over 30 convection days are used as observation dataset. Simulations are made using the regional-scale Weather Research and Forecasting Model (WRF) with five microphysical schemes of varying complexity (double moment, spectral bin (SBM), and particle property prediction (P3)). Statistical characteristics of heavy rain and hail events of varying intensities are compared between simulations and observations. All simulations, regardless of the microphysical scheme, predict heavy rain events that cover larger average areas than those observed by radar. The frequency of these heavy rain events is similar to radar-measured heavy rain events, but still scatters by a factor of 2 around the observations, depending on the microphysical scheme. The model is generally unable to simulate extreme hail events with reflectivity thresholds of 55 dBZ and higher, although they have been observed by radar during the evaluation period. For slightly weaker hail/graupel events, only the P3 model is able to reproduce the observed statistics. Analysis of the raindrop size distribution in combination with the model mixing ratio shows that the P3, Thompson 2-mom, and Thompson aerosol-aware models produce large raindrops too frequently, and the SBM model misses large rain and graupel particles.

Gregor Köcher et al.

Status: open (until 03 Feb 2023)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-835', Anonymous Referee #1, 12 Jan 2023 reply

Gregor Köcher et al.

Model code and software

Software repository Gregor Köcher https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7428844

Gregor Köcher et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 250 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
189 57 4 250 3 3
  • HTML: 189
  • PDF: 57
  • XML: 4
  • Total: 250
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Dec 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 257 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 257 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 31 Jan 2023
Download
Short summary
Polarimetric radar observations of 30 days of convective precipitation events are used to statistically analyze 5 state-of-the-art microphysics schemes of varying complexity. The frequency and area of simulated heavy precipitation events are in some cases significantly different from those observed, depending on the microphysics scheme. Analysis of simulated particle size distributions and reflectivities shows that some schemes have problems reproducing the correct particle size distributions.
Altmetrics