Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-731
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-731
 
28 Nov 2022
28 Nov 2022
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ACP.

A Profile-based Estimated Inversion Strength

Zhenquan Wang1, Jian Yuan1, Robert Wood2, Yifan Chen1, and Tiancheng Tong3 Zhenquan Wang et al.
  • 1School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China
  • 2Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Washington, Seattle, USA
  • 3Tianwen School, Yichang, China

Abstract. To better measure the planetary boundary layer inversion strength (IS), a novel profile-based estimated inversion strength (EISp) is developed using the ERA5 daily reanalysis data. The EISp is designed to estimate the IS based on the thinnest possible reanalysis layer above the lifting condensation level encompassing the inversion layer. At the Southern Great Plains site, the EISp better correlates with the radiosonde-detected IS (R=0.74) than the lower-tropospheric stability (LTS, R=0.53) and the estimated inversion strength (EIS, R=0.45). And the daily variance in low-cloud cover (LCC) explained by the EISp is twice that explained by the LTS and EIS. Higher correlations between the EISp and the radiosonde-detected IS are also found at worldwide radiosonde stations.

Analysis on LCC observed by geostationary satellites and the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer shows that the EISp explains 78 % of the annual mean LCC spatial variance over global oceans and land, larger than that explained by the LTS / EIS (48 % / 13 %). Over tropical and subtropical low-cloud prevailing eastern oceans, LCC range is more resolved by the EISp (48 %) than the LTS / EIS (37 % / 36 %). And the EISp explains a larger fraction (32 %) in the daily LCC variance, as compared to that explained by the LTS / EIS (14 % / 16 %). The seasonal LCC variance explained by the EISp is 89 %, larger than that explained by the LTS/EIS (80 % / 70 %). The relationship between EISp and LCC is more uniform across various time scales than the LCC-LTS / EIS relationship. It is suggested that the EISp is a better cloud controlling factor for LCC and likely a useful external environmental constraint for process-level studies in which there is a need to control for large-scale meteorology in order to isolate the cloud responses to aerosols on short timescales.

Zhenquan Wang et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-731', Anonymous Referee #1, 15 Dec 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on acp-2022-731', Anonymous Referee #2, 05 Jan 2023

Zhenquan Wang et al.

Zhenquan Wang et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 335 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
247 81 7 335 2 3
  • HTML: 247
  • PDF: 81
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 335
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Nov 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 335 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 335 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 01 Feb 2023
Download
Short summary
This study develops a novel profile-based algorithm based on the ERA5 to better estimate the inversion strength in the planetary boundary layer than the previous inversion index, which is a key low-cloud controlling factor. This improved measure is more effective at representing the meteorological influence on low cloud variations. It can better constrain the meteorological influence on low clouds, to better isolate cloud responses to aerosols or estimate low cloud feedbacks in climate models.
Altmetrics