Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-537
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-537
 
26 Aug 2022
26 Aug 2022
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ACP.

Observations of microphysical properties and radiative effects of contrail cirrus and natural cirrus over the North Atlantic

Ziming Wang1,2, Luca Bugliaro1, Tina Jurkat-Witschas1, Romy Heller1, Ulrike Burkhardt1, Helmut Ziereis1, Georgios Dekoutsidis1, Martin Wirth1, Silke Groß1, Simon Kirschler1,3, Stefan Kaufmann1, and Christiane Voigt1,3 Ziming Wang et al.
  • 1Institute of Atmospheric Physics, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, 82234, Germany
  • 2Meteorological Institute Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80333, Germany
  • 3Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55128, Germany

Abstract. Contrail cirrus constitute the largest radiative forcing (RF) component of the aviation effect on climate. However, the difference of microphysical properties and radiative effects between contrails, contrail cirrus and natural cirrus clouds are still not completely resolved. Motivated by these uncertainties, we investigate the cirrus perturbed by aviation in the North Atlantic Region on 26 March 2014 during the Mid Latitude Cirrus (ML-CIRRUS) experiment. In the synoptic context of a ridge cirrus cloud, an extended thin ice cloud with many persistent contrails can be observed for many hours with the geostationary Meteosat Second Generation (MSG)/Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI) from the morning hours until dissipation close to 14 UTC. Airborne lidar observations aboard the German High Altitude and LOng Range Research Aircraft (HALO) suggest that this cloud is mainly of anthropogenic origin. We develop a new method to distinguish between contrails, contrail cirrus and natural cirrus based on in situ measurements of ice number and NO gas concentrations. It turns out that effective radii (Reff) of contrail cirrus and contrails are in the range of 3 to 53 µm and about 18 % smaller than that of natural cirrus, hence a difference in Reff is still present. Ice particle sizes in contrail cirrus are on average 114 % larger than in contrails. The optical thickness of natural cirrus, contrail cirrus and contrails derived from satellite data has similar distributions with average values of 0.21, 0.24 and 0.15 for these three cloud types, respectively. As for radiative effects, a new method to estimate top-of-atmosphere instantaneous RF in the solar and thermal range is developed based on radiative transfer model simulations exploiting in situ and lidar measurements, satellite observations and ERA5 reanalysis data for both cirrus and cirrus-free regions. Broadband irradiances estimated from our simulations compare well with satellite observations from MSG and the Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget (GERB), indicating that our method provides a good representation of the real atmosphere and can thus be used to determine RF of ice clouds probed during this flight. Contrails net RF is smaller by a factor of 4 compared to contrail cirrus. On average, the net RF of contrails and contrail cirrus is more strongly warming than that of natural cirrus. For a larger spatial area around the flight path, the RF is well related to that along the flight track. We find warming contrail cirrus and cirrus in the early morning and cooling contrail cirrus and cirrus during the day. The results will be valuable for research to constrain uncertainties in the assessment of climate impacts of natural cirrus and contrail cirrus and for the formulation and evaluation of contrail mitigation options.

Ziming Wang et al.

Status: open (until 07 Oct 2022)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-537', Darrel Baumgardner, 19 Sep 2022 reply
  • RC2: 'Comment on acp-2022-537', Anonymous Referee #2, 20 Sep 2022 reply
  • RC3: 'Comment on acp-2022-537', Anonymous Referee #3, 27 Sep 2022 reply

Ziming Wang et al.

Ziming Wang et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 389 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
289 93 7 389 0 1
  • HTML: 289
  • PDF: 93
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 389
  • BibTeX: 0
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Aug 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 404 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 404 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Sep 2022
Download
Short summary
This paper discusses differences between contrails, contrail cirrus and natural cirrus combining HALO aircraft measurements and MSG satellite remote sensing with radiative transfer simulations for cases in the ML-CIRRUS campaign over the North Atlantic. Microphysical properties are evaluated to investigate the evolution of contrails. Contrail cirrus net radiative forcing is four times as large as for contrails, and natural cirrus is in-between.
Altmetrics