Acceleration of the southern African easterly jet driven by radiative effect of biomass burning aerosols and its impact on transport during AEROCLO-sA
- 1Laboratoire d’Aérologie (LAERO), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- 2LATMOS/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UVSQ, Paris, France
- 3National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
- 1Laboratoire d’Aérologie (LAERO), Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France
- 2LATMOS/IPSL, Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UVSQ, Paris, France
- 3National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Abstract. The direct and semi-direct radiative effects of biomass burning aerosols (BBA) are investigated over southern Africa and the southeast Atlantic during the Aerosols, Radiation and Clouds in southern Africa (AEROCLO-sA) field campaign in September 2017. A reference convection-permitting simulation has been performed using the Meso-NH model with an on-line dust emission scheme, a BBA tracer emitted using the daily Global Fire Emissions Database and online-computed backward Lagrangian trajectories. The simulation captures both the aerosol optical depth and the vertical distribution of aerosols as observed from airborne and space-borne lidars. It also reproduces the occurrence of stratocumulus over the southeast Atlantic, deep convective clouds over equatorial Africa and the large-scale circulation. In contrast, a sensitivity experiment where the radiative effect of BBA is not taken into account shows the smoke plume that is predicted too low in altitude, low-cloud cover that is too weak, deep convective activity that is too frequent but not intense enough, a Benguela jet that is too strong and a southern African easterly jet that is too weak. The Lagrangian analysis indicates that BBA are transported to higher altitudes, farther southwest and with a stronger diurnal oscillation when accounting of the radiative effects of BBA. The higher smoke plume altitude can be explained by a combination of three factors: increased upward motion induced by the stronger southern African easterly jet, self-lofting of BBA and reduced subsidence associated with a less frequent deep convective activity over equatorial Africa.
Jean-Pierre Chaboureau et al.
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-233', Anonymous Referee #1, 22 Apr 2022
Summary comments:
In this manuscript, the authors use two convection-permitting simulations one taking into account the BBA radiative effect and the other not to address the direct and semi-direct effects of BBA over southern Africa and the southeast Atlantic during the AEROCLO-sA field campaign in September 2017.
Both simulations are examined against satellite, airborne and ground-based observations and ECMWF analyses. Efforts are made to understand the acceleration of the southern components of the African Easterly Jet.
There is no doubt that such a comparison adds value to understanding the overall dynamic of AEJ-S and heat low, which are linked to the direct radiative effect over Angola and Namibia. However, there are numerous (sometimes major) concerns with the analysis and approach. Therefore, I encourage the authors to significantly revise the paper.
Abstract:
The readability of the Abstract may be improved by using scientifically relevant terms such as "baroclinicity" and highlighting key mechanisms in general terms rather than discussing specific simulations issues.
Introduction :
The introduction is quite good and correctly motivates the study. But there are less relevant sentences and less citations. I strongly recommend looking at the introduction in a direct and succinct way to properly motivate the questions you hope to answer.
Data:
It is not clear why only September 2017 was used in the study. Please explain why.
Results section:
The dynamic and corresponding mathematical framework (e.g., Radiative heating, temperature gradient etc.) used in this study is unclear and makes it very difficult to understand the attributions/mechanisms for the differences in the AEJ-S intensity. Improvements are necessary here.
The authors need to clarify the method used to define the AEJ-S core to produce Figure 3. Also, clarification should be provided on why 8 m/s was used to identify AEJ-S.
Refine the colour bar in Figure. 1 so that all colours are used.
Clarify by explicitly writing the equation/formula used to create Figure5.
Section 3 was essentially descriptive and was correct. Section 4 deals with the direct effects of the BBA on the atmosphere - radiation distribution and circulation and have a better-developed process approach. I like your analyses. The main concern I have is about the perspective of coupling within the atmosphere (radiation, transport, rain and convection), in that the acceleration of the AEJ-S is associated with radiative heating and increases the temperature through the intensity of the thermal heat low and gradient in temperature. So there must be some relationship and consistency among the sections 3 and 4 analyses.
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jean-Pierre Chaboureau, 20 May 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-233/acp-2022-233-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jean-Pierre Chaboureau, 20 May 2022
-
RC2: 'Comment on acp-2022-233', Anonymous Referee #2, 22 Apr 2022
Please see the reviewer comments in the attached pdf as a supplement.
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jean-Pierre Chaboureau, 20 May 2022
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2022-233/acp-2022-233-AC2-supplement.pdf
-
AC2: 'Reply on RC2', Jean-Pierre Chaboureau, 20 May 2022
Jean-Pierre Chaboureau et al.
Jean-Pierre Chaboureau et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
277 | 85 | 13 | 375 | 3 | 4 |
- HTML: 277
- PDF: 85
- XML: 13
- Total: 375
- BibTeX: 3
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1