Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-182
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-182
 
07 Apr 2022
07 Apr 2022
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ACP.

Effects of Reanalysis Forcing Fields on Ozone Trends from a Chemical Transport Model

Yajuan Li1, Sandip S. Dhomse2,3, Martyn P. Chipperfield2,3, Wuhu Feng2,4, Andreas Chrysanthou2, Yuan Xia1, and Dong Guo5 Yajuan Li et al.
  • 1School of Electronic Engineering, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing, China
  • 2School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 3National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 4National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
  • 5Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education/Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change/Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China

Abstract. We use the TOMCAT 3-dimensional (3D) off-line chemical transport model (CTM) forced by two different meteorological reanalysis datasets (ERA-Interim and ERA5) from the European Centre for Medium-Range weather Forecasts (ECMWF) to study stratospheric ozone trends and variability. The model-simulated ozone variations are evaluated against two observation-based data sets. For total column ozone (TCO) we use the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) data (1979–2019), while for ozone profiles we use the Stratospheric Water and OzOne Satellite Homogenized (SWOOSH) database (1984–2019). We find that the CTM simulations forced by ERA-Interim (A_ERAI) and ERA5 (B_ERA5) can both successfully reproduce spatial and temporal variations in stratospheric ozone. Modelled TCO anomalies from B_ ERA5 show better agreement with C3S than A_ERAI, especially in northern hemisphere (NH) mid-latitudes, except that it produces large positive biases (> 15 DU) during winter-spring seasons. Ozone profile comparisons against SWOOSH data show larger differences between the two simulations. In the lower stratosphere, which controls the TCO, these are primarily due to differences in transport, whereas in the upper stratosphere they can be directly attributed to the differences in temperatures between the two reanalysis data sets. Although TCO anomalies from B_ERA5 show better agreement with C3S compared to A_ERAI, comparison with SWOOSH data does not confirm that B_ERA5 performs better in simulating the stratospheric ozone profiles. We employ a multi-variate regression model with piecewise linear trends (PWLT) to quantify ozone trends before and after peak stratospheric halogen loading in 1997. This model shows that compared to C3S, TCO recovery trends (since 1998) in simulation B_ERA5 are significantly overestimated in the southern hemisphere (SH) mid-latitudes, while for A_ERAI in the NH mid-latitudes simulated ozone trends remain negative. Similarly, in the lower stratosphere B_ERA5 shows positive ozone recovery trends for both NH and SH mid-latitudes. In contrast, both SWOOSH and A_ERAI show opposite (negative) trends in the NH mid-latitudes. We analyse Age-of-Air (AoA) trends to diagnose transport differences between the two reanalysis data sets. Simulation B_ERA5 shows a positive AoA trend after 1998 and somewhat older age in the NH lower stratosphere compared to A_ERAI, indicating a slower Brewer-Dobson circulation does not translate into reduced wintertime ozone build-up in the NH extratropical lower stratosphere. Overall, our results show that models forced by the most recent ERA5 reanalyses may not yet be capable of reproducing observed changes in stratospheric ozone, particularly in the lower stratosphere.

Yajuan Li et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2022-182', Anonymous Referee #2, 25 Apr 2022
  • RC2: 'very interesting paper, some minor corrections are needed', Mark Weber, 04 May 2022

Yajuan Li et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 391 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
320 61 10 391 27 2 3
  • HTML: 320
  • PDF: 61
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 391
  • Supplement: 27
  • BibTeX: 2
  • EndNote: 3
Views and downloads (calculated since 07 Apr 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 07 Apr 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 410 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 410 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 27 May 2022
Download
Short summary
Chemical transport models forced with (re)analysis meteorological fields are ideally suited for interpreting the influence of important physical processes on the ozone variability. We use TOMCAT forced by ECMWF ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data sets to investigate the effects of reanalysis forcing fields on ozone changes. Our results show that models forced by ERA5 reanalyses may not yet be capable of reproducing observed changes in stratospheric ozone, particularly in the lower stratosphere.
Altmetrics