Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
Download
Short summary
Reanalysis data of vertical wind (w) is widely used by the atmospheric community to determine various calculation of atmospheric circulations, diabatic heating, convection etc. There are no studies that assess the available reanalysis data with respect to the observations. The present study for the first time assess all the reanalysis w by comparing it with 20 years of radar data from Gadanki and Kototabang. It shows downdrafts and peak in the updrafts are not produced in the reanalyses.
Altmetrics
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-18

  27 Mar 2020

27 Mar 2020

Review status: a revised version of this preprint was accepted for the journal ACP and is expected to appear here in due course.

Assessment of vertical air motion among reanalyses and qualitative comparison with direct VHF radar measurements over the two tropical stations

Kizhathur Narasimhan Uma1, Siddarth Shankar Das1, Madineni Venkat Ratnam2, and Kuniyil Viswanathan Suneeth1 Kizhathur Narasimhan Uma et al.
  • 1Space Physics Laboratory, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, ISRO, Trivandrum – 695022, India
  • 2National Atmospheric Research Laboratory, Dept. of Space, Gadanki – 517112, India

Abstract. Vertical wind (w) is one of the most important meteorological parameters for understanding different atmospheric phenomena. Only very few direct measurements of w are available and most of the time one must depend on reanalysis products. In the present study, assessment of w among selected reanalyses, (ERA-Interim, ERA-5, MERRA-2, NCEP-2 and JRA-55) and qualitative comparison of those datasets with direct VHF radar measurements over the convectively active regions Gadanki (13.5° N and 79.2° E) and Kototabang (0° S and 100.2° E) are presented for the first time. The magnitude of w derived from reanalyses is 10–50 % less than that from the direct radar observations. Radar measurements of w show downdrafts below 8 to 10 km and updrafts above 8–10 km over both locations. Inter-comparison between the reanalyses shows that ERAi is overestimating NCEP-2 and underestimating all the reanalyses. Directional tendency shows that the percentage of updrafts captured is reasonably good, but downdrafts are not well captured by all reanalyses. Thus, caution is advised when using vertical velocities from reanalyses.

Kizhathur Narasimhan Uma et al.

 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Kizhathur Narasimhan Uma et al.

Kizhathur Narasimhan Uma et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 465 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
368 87 10 465 13 13
  • HTML: 368
  • PDF: 87
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 465
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Mar 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Mar 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 421 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 416 with geography defined and 5 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 16 Jan 2021
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Reanalysis data of vertical wind (w) is widely used by the atmospheric community to determine various calculation of atmospheric circulations, diabatic heating, convection etc. There are no studies that assess the available reanalysis data with respect to the observations. The present study for the first time assess all the reanalysis w by comparing it with 20 years of radar data from Gadanki and Kototabang. It shows downdrafts and peak in the updrafts are not produced in the reanalyses.
Citation
Altmetrics