Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
Download
Short summary
Aircraft in situ observations of low level Beaufort Sea cloud properties and thermodynamics from the ARISE campaign are compared with the Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) to better understand deficiencies in simulated clouds. ASR produces too little cloud water, which coincides with being too warm and dry. In addition, ASR struggles to produce cloud water even in favorable thermodynamic conditions. A random sampling experiment also shows the effects of the limited aircraft sampling on the results.
Altmetrics
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1003
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1003

  02 Dec 2020

02 Dec 2020

Review status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal ACP.

Evaluation of Simulated Cloud Water in Low Clouds over the Beaufort Sea in Arctic System Reanalysis using ARISE Airborne In Situ Observations

J. Brant Dodson1, Patrick C. Taylor2, Richard H. Moore2, David H. Bromwich3, Keith M. Hines3, Kenneth L. Thornhill1, Chelsea A. Corr4, Bruce E. Anderson2, Edward L. Winstead1, and Joseph R. Bennett5 J. Brant Dodson et al.
  • 1Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Hampton, VA, 23666, USA
  • 2NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, 23681-2199, USA
  • 3Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar & Climate Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA
  • 4Department of Biology/Chemistry, Springfield College, Springfield, MA, 01109, USA
  • 5National Suborbital Research Center, NASA AMES Research Center, Moffett Field, CA 94035-0001, USA

Abstract. Arctic low clouds and the water they contain influence the evolution of the Arctic system through their effects on radiative fluxes, boundary layer mixing, stability, turbulence, humidity, and precipitation. Atmospheric models struggle to accurately simulate the occurrence and properties of Arctic low clouds, stemming from errors in both the simulated atmospheric state and the dependence of cloud properties on the atmospheric state. Knowledge of the contributions from these two factors to the model errors allows for the isolation of the process contributions to the model-observation differences. We analyze the differences between the Arctic System Reanalysis version 2 (ASR) and data taken during the September 2014 Arctic Radiation-IceBridge Sea and Ice Experiment (ARISE) airborne campaign conducted over the Beaufort Sea. The results show that ASR produces less total and liquid cloud water than observed along the flight track and is unable to simulate observed large in-cloud water content. Contributing to this bias, ASR is warmer by nearly 1.5 K and drier by 0.06 g kg−1 (relative humidity 4.3 % lower) than observed. Moreover, ASR produces cloud water over a much narrower range of thermodynamic conditions than shown in ARISE observations. Analyzing the ARISE-ASR differences by thermodynamic conditions, our results indicate that the differences are primarily attributed to disagreements in the cloud-thermodynamic relationships, and secondarily (but importantly) to differences in the occurrence frequency of thermodynamic regimes. The ratio of the factors is about 2 / 3 to 1 / 3. Substantial sampling uncertainties are found within low likelihood atmospheric regimes; sampling noise cannot be ruled out as a cause of observation-model differences, despite large differences. Thus, an important lesson from this analysis is that when comparing in situ airborne data and model output, one should not restrict the comparison to flight track-only model output.

J. Brant Dodson et al.

 
Status: open (until 10 Feb 2021)
Status: open (until 10 Feb 2021)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
[Subscribe to comment alert] Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

J. Brant Dodson et al.

Data sets

ARISE_Cloud_AircraftInSitu_C130_Data_1 NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC https://doi.org/10.5067/AIRCRAFT/ARISE_Cloud_AircraftInSitu_C130_Data_1

ARISE_MetNav_AircraftInSitu_C130_Data_1 NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC https://doi.org/10.5067/AIRCRAFT/ARISE_MetNav_AircraftInSitu_C130_Data_1

J. Brant Dodson et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 56 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
45 11 0 56 1 2
  • HTML: 45
  • PDF: 11
  • XML: 0
  • Total: 56
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 2
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Dec 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 02 Dec 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 180 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 163 with geography defined and 17 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 20 Jan 2021
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Aircraft in situ observations of low level Beaufort Sea cloud properties and thermodynamics from the ARISE campaign are compared with the Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) to better understand deficiencies in simulated clouds. ASR produces too little cloud water, which coincides with being too warm and dry. In addition, ASR struggles to produce cloud water even in favorable thermodynamic conditions. A random sampling experiment also shows the effects of the limited aircraft sampling on the results.
Citation
Altmetrics