<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACPD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACPD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7375</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acpd-15-4677-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>In-situ single submicron particle composition analysis of ice residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase clouds <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> in Central Europe</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{In-situ single submicron particle composition analysis of ice residuals}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~Schmidt et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          <email>susan.schmidt@mpic.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Schneider</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7169-3973</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Klimach</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Mertes</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Schenk</surname><given-names>L. P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Curtius</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3153-4630</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Kupiszewski</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3284-813X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff9">
          <name><surname>Hammer</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-8570</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Vochezer</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Lloyd</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Ebert</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Kandler</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Weinbruch</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff8">
          <name><surname>Borrmann</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4774-9380</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Particle Chemistry Department, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, 55128 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, 04318 Leipzig, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Sciences, Goethe-University of Frankfurt am Main, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>School of Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Environmental Science, The University of Manchester, M13 9 PL Manchester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Environmental Mineralogy, Institute of Applied Geoscience, Technical University Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Institute for Atmospheric Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55128 Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>*</label><institution>now at: Grolimund + Partner AG – environmental engineering, 3018 Bern, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">S. Schmidt (susan.schmidt@mpic.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>4677</fpage><lpage>4724</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>November</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>This paper presents results from the “INUIT-JFJ/CLACE 2013” field campaign at the high alpine research station Jungfraujoch in
January/February 2013. The chemical composition of ice particle residuals (IPR) in a size diameter range of 200–900 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
was measured in orographic, convective and non-convective clouds with a single particle mass spectrometer (ALABAMA) under ambient
conditions characterized by temperatures between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and wind speed from 0.1 to
21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  Additionally, background aerosol particles in cloud free air were investigated. The IPR were sampled from
mixed-phase clouds with two inlets which selectively extract small ice crystals in-cloud, namely the Counterflow Virtual Impactor
(Ice-CVI) and the Ice Selective Inlet (ISI). The IPR as well as the aerosol particles were classified into seven different
particle types: (1) black carbon, (2) organic carbon, (3) black carbon internally mixed with organic carbon, (4) minerals, (5) one
particle group (termed “BioMinSal”) that may contain biological particles, minerals, or salts, (6) industrial metals, and (7)
lead containing particles. For any sampled particle population it was determined by means of single particle mass spectrometer how
many of the analyzed particles belonged to each of these categories. Accordingly, between 20 and 30 % of the IPR and
roughly 42 % of the background particles contained organic carbon. The measured fractions of minerals in the IPR composition
varied from 6 to 33 %, while the values for the “BioMinSal” group were between 15 and 29 %. Four percent
to 31 % of the IPR contained organic carbon mixed with black carbon. Both inlets delivered similar results of the chemical
composition and of the particle size distribution, although lead was found only in the IPR sampled by the Ice-CVI. The results
show that the ice particle residual composition varies substantially between different cloud events, which indicates the influence
of different meteorological conditions, such as origin of the air masses, temperature and wind speed.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Ice formation in clouds influences the life-time of clouds and precipitation as well as solar and thermal radiation (Lohmann and
Feichter, 2005).  There are two major pathways by which ice is formed in the atmosphere: homogeneous and heterogeneous
freezing. The spontaneous formation of ice inside droplets at temperatures of lower <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and without any catalysts is
called homogenous freezing (Cantrell and Heymsfield, 2005) and occurs in high clouds at a saturation similar to that of liquid
water (Koop et al., 2000).  Heterogeneous freezing needs particulate catalysts to initiate freezing at temperatures higher than
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in mixed-phase clouds. These catalysts are called ice nucleating particles (INP). There are four different
heterogeneous ice formation modes (Pruppacher and Klett, 2010): deposition nucleation, condensation freezing, immersion freezing
and contact freezing. Because heterogeneous freezing starts at higher temperatures than homogeneous freezing, ice crystals, which
are formed by ice nucleating particles grow faster (by diffusion) and perhaps precipitate first (DeMott et al., 1998).</p>
      <p>Ice formation is very selective because of the low number concentration of particles that can act as INP. Roughly about one in
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> atmospheric particles can act as INP (Rogers et al., 1998; DeMott et al., 2010). The ice nucleation is induced at some
point on the surface of the nucleating particle and the ice nucleation ability of different types if aerosol particles is usually
described either by an ice active-site density approach or by classical nucleation theory involving a contact angle (see
e.g. Steinke et al., 2014, and references therein). Several laboratory and field studies have shown that certain mineral dusts
belong to the most important ice nucleators in the atmosphere (e.g. DeMott, 2003; DeMott et al., 2003; Cantrell and Heymsfield,
2005; Kamphus et al., 2010; Hartmann et al., 2011; Murray et al., 2011, 2012; Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Atkinson
et al., 2013; Diehl et al., 2014). Also biological particles like bacteria, pollen and spores (e.g. Diehl et al., 2001; von Blohn
et al., 2005; Möhler et al., 2007; Pratt et al., 2009; Prenni et al., 2009; Diehl and Wurzler, 2010), soot (e.g. Cozic et al.,
2008a; Pratt and Prather, 2010; Pratt et al., 2010) and effloresced salts (Abbatt et al., 2006; Wise et al., 2012) have good ice
nucleation capabilities. There is also some evidence that glassy organics (Froyd et al., 2010; Murray et al., 2010), porous
particles (Adler et al., 2013) and lead-containing particles (Cziczo et al., 2009; Ebert et al., 2011) have favorable ice
nucleation qualities.</p>
      <p>Direct measurements of the chemical composition of single INP or IPR (Ice particle residuals <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> particles remaining after the ice
of cloud ice particles is evaporated) are important to better understand ice formation in mixed-phase clouds, to improve the
prediction of precipitation, and to evaluate the influence of anthropogenic aerosol on these processes.  Measurements of INP/IPR
require instrumentation that can separate the INP/IPR from the background or interstitial aerosol particles and supercooled drops
and measure the chemical composition on-line. In several field studies a combination of a CFDC (Continuous Flow Diffusion Chamber;
Chen et al., 1998), a CVI (Counterflow Virtual Impactor; Cziczo et al., 2003) which separates the ice
crystals from background aerosol and a Single Particle Mass Spectrometer (SMPS; DeMott et al., 2003; Cziczo et al., 2003, 2004;
Cziczo, 2004; Pratt et al., 2009; Corbin et al., 2012) to measure ice nucleating particles were deployed. Previous measurements of
INP and IPR (on-line and off-line) conducted at the Jungfraujoch showed that particles consisting of mineral components dominate
the ice particles number (Kamphus et al., 2010), but also particles containing black carbon (Mertes et al., 2007; Cozic et al.,
2008a) and lead (Cziczo et al., 2009; Ebert et al., 2011) were found to be enriched in IPR.</p>
      <p>Here we report on measurements conducted with the single particle instrument ALABAMA (Aircraft-based Laser Ablation Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer; Brands et al., 2011) to analyze the chemical composition of IPR sampled by two unique different ice sampling
inlets. The goal of these measurements was to investigate the chemical composition of IPR in ambient mixed-phase clouds in upward
transported boundary layer air and free tropospheric air at the high-alpine research station Jungfraujoch (JFJ;
3580 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Central Europe. Additionally, background aerosol was measured by the use of a total inlet during cloud
free conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Experimental</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Measurement location and meteorological conditions</title>
      <p>The intensive field campaign INUIT-JFJ/CLACE 2013 in January/February 2013 at the High Alpine Research Station Jungfraujoch (JFJ,
Swiss Alps; Sphinx Laboratory, 3580 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 7<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>59<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,
46<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>32<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>53<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) took place in the framework of the DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft)-funded
research unit INUIT (Ice Nuclei research UnIT) and the Swiss National Science Foundation-funded <italic>Interaction of aerosols with Clouds and Radiation project</italic> (see also overview paper by Schneider et al., this issue). The IPR were sampled out of
mixed-phase clouds by the Ice-CVI (Ice Counterflow Virtual Impactor; Mertes et al., 2007) and the ISI (Ice Selective Inlet;
Kupiszewski et al., 2014) and fed into the ALABAMA single particle mass spectrometer (Brands et al., 2011).  During cloud free
times the ALABAMA was connected to the heated total-inlet to sample the background aerosol particles. The Ice-CVI and the
total-inlet were located in a central position on the roof of the Sphinx Laboratory and the ISI was located at the railing at the
eastern edge of the roof. A short description of the instruments is given in Sects. 2.1 to 2.4. The meteorological conditions
during the campaign along with basic information on the encountered cloud types are summarized in Table 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>ALABAMA (Aircraft-based Laser ABlation Aerosol MAss spectrometer)</title>
      <p>The ALABAMA (Brands et al., 2011) consists of three sections: aerosol inlet, sizing region and desorption/ionization region. The
aerosol inlet is an aerodynamic lens (Liu-type; Liu et al., 1995a, b, 2007; Kamphus et al., 2008) which focuses aerosol
particles to a narrow beam by utilizing 6 apertures with decreasing diameter. The particles are separated from ambient air and
accelerated to 50–100 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while entering the vacuum-system. For optimal sampling conditions the pressure in front
of the aerodynamic lens should be between 0.5 and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and for this a critical nozzle is used, which limits the flow to
80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under standard working conditions and which reduces the pre-pressure of the lens to
3.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. During this campaign, the critical orifice was constructed by a constricted O-ring such that also under
Jungfraujoch conditions (ambient pressure around 630 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) the lens pressure was regulated to best operating
conditions. A skimmer separates the first and the second pumping stages. Two continuous wave detection lasers, which are
orthogonal to the particle beam, are located in the second pumping stage. As a modification of the instrument described in Brands
et al. (2011), two UV laser diodes (Blu-Ray laser; InGaN, 405 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are now used. The particles pass through the laser beams
and the scattered light is reflected by an elliptical mirror and detected by a photomultiplier tube (PMT). The vacuum aerodynamic
particle size (DeCarlo et al., 2004) can be determined from the velocity of the particles by calibration with particles of known
size. In this section the ablation laser (pulsed Nd-YAG-Laser, 266 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; 6–8 mJ per pulse, 5.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> per pulse,
max. 21 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is triggered. If one particle passes through both laser beams, the in-house designed and built electronic
control system sends out a trigger signal to the ablation laser, the laser shoots and ionizes the particles. The ions are
separated in the Z-shaped bipolar time-of-flight mass spectrometer (TOFWERK AG, Switzerland) by their mass-to-charge ratio. In
principle both signals (for positive and negative ions) can be detected using a multichannel plate (MCP). However, for this study
only positive ions were available due to technical issues.  The average mass resolution <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the Z-ToF mass
spectrometer ranges between 100 for low <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values and 200 for larger ions (Brands et al., 2011).</p>
      <p>Additionally the particle size distribution was measured by
a Sky-OPC (Optical Particle
Counter;  Grimm 1.129) integrated
into the ALABAMA instrument upstream of the aerodynamic lens covering a size
diameter range from 0.25 to 52 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to the size limitation by the inlet system
a maximal particle size of approximately 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
measured. Both instruments sampled through
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stainless steel tubes with different lengths (ISI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;  Ice-CVI <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>126</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>;  total <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>261</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Particle losses inside the sampling tube were calculated with the Particle
Loss Calculator (von der Weiden et al., 2009). In
the size range between 200 and 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the transmission efficiency is
about 99 % for all three inlets. The larger the
particles and the longer the tubes, the higher are the
losses inside the tubes. For a size of 3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
transmission efficiency is between 90 and 45 %.
The switching between the three different inlets was performed
manually.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Ice-CVI (Ice Counterflow Virtual Impactor)</title>
      <p>The Ice-CVI is designed to sample IPR from mixed-phase clouds. A detailed description and instrumental characterization is
provided in Mertes et al. (2007), thus it is only briefly described here. The Ice-CVI uses an omnidirectional inlet, which removes
particles larger than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the aspired air. The separation of the particles larger than 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> out of
the sample flow is done with a virtual impactor (VI) downstream of the inlet.  After that the supercooled droplets (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are removed by a pre-impactor (PI). The PI consists of impaction plates colder than 0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The
supercooled droplets freeze on these plates upon contact while the ice crystals bounce off and remain in the sample
flow. Subsequently, a counterflow virtual impactor (CVI, Mertes et al., 2005) rejects the interstitial aerosol particles so that
only small ice crystals (i.e. those with aerodynamic size diameters between 5 and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) remain in the sample flow. It
is assumed that such small ice crystals have very recently formed in the close vicinity to the measurement site. For complete
sublimation, the small ice particles are injected into particle-free and dry carrier air inside the CVI. The aerosol particles
that remain after evaporation/sublimation of the ice are termed IPR. The walls of the evaporation tube as well as the carrier air
are at room temperature. The IPR can be transferred to different aerosol instruments for physico-chemical characterization.  The
sampling principle of the CVI leads to an enrichment of the collected particles. This enrichment (factors between 5 and 10) is
given by the ratio of the velocity upstream and downstream the CVI inlet tip.</p>
      <p>A CPC (Condensation Particle Counter, model 3010, TSI Inc.) was connected downstream of the Ice-CVI at a suitable position for
measuring to determine the total particle number concentration of the IPR. Significant non-zero particle number concentrations
indicate the presence of ice particles in mixed-phase clouds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <title>ISI (Ice Selective Inlet)</title>
      <p>Extracting IPR from mixed-phase clouds was also possible with the ISI (detailed description in Kupiszewski et al., 2014).  Small
ice crystals (the IPR within are assumed to be representative of the original ice nuclei) are segregated from larger ice crystals,
supercooled droplets and interstitial aerosol particles by a combination of four inlet components. The first component is the
omnidirectional inlet, which is shielded from above in order prevent large precipitating particles entering the
inlet. Subsequently, a custom-made cyclone (BGI Inc.)  removes ice crystals, with aerodynamic diameters of ca. 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cut size, i.e., the particle diameter at which 50 % of incoming particles are removed from the sample flow) and
larger. Further downstream the removal of supercooled droplets takes place in a custom built ice-coated droplet evaporation
chamber using the Wegener–Bergeron–Findeisen process. The key difference to the Ice-CVI is that here the separation of
supercooled droplets from ice crystals is conducted in the airborne state via evaporation. Finally, the interstitial aerosol and
the cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) released during droplet evaporation are removed by a pumped counterflow virtual impactor
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn>50</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The extracted ice crystals with aerodynamic diameter between 5 and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
heated and the released IPR are transferred into the laboratory for physical and chemical characterization using state of the art
single particle aerosol instrumentation (single particle soot photometer (SP2), ALABAMA single particle mass spectrometer,
Wideband Integrated Bioaerosol Sensor (WIBS) and a Grimm optical particle counter). The ISI additionally allows for simultaneous
counting, sizing and imaging of the hydrometers contained in the cloud with the use of two WELAS (white light aerosol
spectrometer) aerosol sensor system (Palas GmbH) and a Particle Phase Discriminator (PPD). These are placed behind the cyclone
(first WELAS sensor) as well as behind the droplet evaporation unit (second WELAS sensor and PPD). The ISI, together with the
downstream aerosol instrumentation, thus provides number size distribution of sampled hydrometers and aerosol particles,
information on ice crystal shape and surface roughness, as well as number size distribution and chemical composition of ice
residual particles.</p>
      <p>The ISI also enriches the collected particles inside the pumped counterflow virtual impactor with an enrichment factor between 1
and 7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <title>Further instruments</title>
      <p><italic>Particle Volume Monitor (PVM; Gerber, 1996):</italic> The PVM measured the liquid water content (LWC <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> total liquid water
present in a cloud) and the surface area of cloud droplets (e.g., Wendisch, 1998). Cloud droplets cross a laser beam and the
scattered light is measured.  Elevated LWC values are used to identify cloud events, using a threshold value of
20 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the measurement campaign two PVMs were operated by PSI (Paul Scherrer Institute) and the University of
Manchester.</p>
      <p><italic>Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP):</italic> The CDP is a forward-scattering spectrometer for determination of particles sizes and
concentrations of cloud droplets.  Counting and sizing of the particles is done by detecting light scattered by the particles (for
more details see for example Lance et al., 2010).</p>
      <p><italic>Scanning electron microscopy (SEM):</italic> Ice particle residuals (IPR) were collected by a two stage impactor system (50 %
cut-off aerodynamic diameters 1.0 and 0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively) on transmission electron microscopy grids and elemental
boron substrates and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, FEI Quanta 200 FEG, FEI Eindhoven, the Netherlands) and
energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence (EDX, EDAX, Tilburg, the Netherlands) to characterize the particles with regard to their
chemical composition, morphology, size, internal mixing state and electron beam stability (volatility).  (For further details see
Kandler et al., 2011). Here we only present the size distribution of IPR measured by SEM and compare them to the IPR sizes
obtained by the ALABAMA and the sky-OPC. Detailed results on the chemical composition analysis of IPR, INP, and background aerosol
by SEM are given in Worringen et al. (2014).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <title>ALABAMA data evaluation</title>
      <p>The data evaluation was done with the software package CRISP (Concise Retrieval of Information from Single Particles; Klimach,
2012) based on the software IGOR Pro (Version 6, WaveMetrics) and following the procedure described in Roth (2014). This software
package includes mass calibration, conversion of the mass spectra into “stick” spectra by integration over the peak width, and
various procedures to sort the mass spectra into groups or clusters of similar spectra. This sorting can be done manually, by
means of cluster algorithms (<italic>fuzzy c-means</italic> or <italic>k-means</italic>), or by searching for certain parameters (e.g., ion
signals at a certain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio).</p>
      <p>The Clustering depends to some degree on the interstitial settings of the algorithm and its parameters. The start parameters are
<italic>Normalization type and time</italic>, <italic>Preprocessing type</italic>, <italic>Initialisation type</italic>, the <italic>number of clusters</italic>
and the <italic>start cluster difference.</italic> Using the <italic>fuzzy c-means</italic> algorithm (e.g. Bezdek et al., 1984; Hinz et al.,
1999; Huang et al., 2013) the parameters <italic>fuzzifier</italic> and <italic>fuzzy abort</italic> have to be set accordingly. The cluster
parameters are explained in detail in the Appendix.</p>
      <p>As only the cations were detected during the INUIT-JFJ/CLACE 2013 campaign the grouping of the clusters into different particle
types by using certain marker peaks was difficult in some cases. At the end, seven different particles types were extracted: black
carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC), internal mixture of black carbon and organic carbon (BC/OC), lead containing particles,
industrial metals, BioMinSal (containing possible bioparticles, minerals or salts), and minerals. The average mass spectra of each
particle type are shown in Fig. 1. The association of the mass spectra to the individual particle types is explained in detail
below. The error limits of the number of mass spectra per particle types was estimated using counting statistics.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS1">
  <title>Organic fraction: black carbon (BC) and organic carbon (OC)</title>
      <p>The clusters categorized as BC are due to the presence of the typical fragmentation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dall'Osto, 2004; Pratt and
Prather, 2010) of higher mass-to-charge ratios (see Fig. 1a). In comparison to the black carbon, the organic carbon cluster
(Fig. 1b) shows different fragmentations of aromatics ([<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 51); [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 63);
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 77); [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 91), Dall'Osto and Harrison, 2006; Pratt and Prather,
2010), amines ([CHN]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27); [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 58), Pratt and Prather, 2010) or other organic material
([<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27); [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 37); [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/CHNO]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43);
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>N]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 50); [<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59);
[<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 142), Pratt and Prather, 2010). Black carbon internally mixed with
organic (BC/OC) shows both fragmentation types of [C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and [C<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Corbin
et al., 2012; Fig. 1c).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS2">
  <title>Lead containing particles</title>
      <p>Previous measurements at the Jungfraujoch showed that lead-containing particles can be found in IPR (Cziczo et al., 2009; Ebert
et al., 2011). The cluster of lead containing particles shows the typical isotope pattern of lead (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 208, 207, 206, 204;
Fig. 1d).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS3">
  <title>Industrial metals</title>
      <p>The cluster classified as “industrial metals” (Fig. 1e) shows metal signals from anthropogenic (urban/industrial) emissions like
[Cr]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 52, 53, 54, 50), [Co]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 59), [V]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[VO]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 51<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>67), [Fe]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 54, 56), [Mn]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55), [Ni]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 58, 60, 61, 62) and [Zn]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 64, 66, 68) (De Foy et al., 2012).  Chromium and nickel
containing particles might also be due to contamination from stainless steel tubes. However, due to no clear evidence of
contamination these particles were not excluded from the further analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS4">
  <title>BioMinSal cluster</title>
      <p>The spectra in this cluster type contain only metal cations and can therefore not be unambiguous be assigned to a certain
particle type. The spectra in the <italic>BioMinSal</italic> cluster show a mixture or single signals of [Na]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 23), [Al]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27), [K]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39, 41), [Ca]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40) and/or [Fe]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 54, 56). An example of an average spectrum of
this particle type is shown in Fig. 1f.</p>
      <p>The interpretation of this particle cluster is difficult. The signals are most likely cations of different kinds of salts
(Ka<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">KNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are more conceivable than sea salt), minerals or primary biological particles, but without
corresponding anion an unambiguously assignment to one particle type is not possible. Previous investigations of biological
aerosol have shown that metal signals like [Na]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 23), [K]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39) or [Ca]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40) dominate the
cation spectra (e.g. Fergenson et al., 2004; Pratt and Prather, 2010; Frank et al., 2011). During laboratory studies with test
aerosol we also observed mainly single metal signals of sodium and potassium in biological particles, but as well in mineral dust
particles. Also iron (Fe<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 54, 56), which is a typical marker for mineral dust, was observed to occur in some biological
particles (maybe due to hemoglobin or due to other ions with an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 56). For these reasons the cluster “BioMinSal” cannot
be further differentiated in this study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS5">
  <title>Minerals</title>
      <p>Typically marker peaks of minerals are: [Li]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 6, 7), [Mg]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 24, 25), [Al]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27),
[Si]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[SiO]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 28, 29, 30/44), [Ca]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 40), [Ti]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>[TiO]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 48, 46, 47, 49, 50/64) and/or
[Fe]<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 54, 56) (Trimborn, 2002; Dall'Osto, 2004; Dall'Osto et al., 2010) Clusters containing at least three of the
above marker peaks were classified as <italic>minerals</italic> (Fig. 1g).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6.SSS6">
  <title>Others</title>
      <p>The cluster <italic>others</italic> includes all particle mass spectra, which are very noisy or could not be unambiguously assigned to any
of the above cluster types.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p>During the INUIT-JFJ/CLACE 2013 campaign we measured 71064 background aerosol particles during a measurement time of 217 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 1808 ice particle residuals during a measurement time of 256 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: 1664 spectra behind the Ice-CVI during 221 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 144 spectra behind the ISI during 35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Ice particle residual composition and air mass trajectories</title>
      <p>The ALABAMA was used to analyze IPR extracted from mixed-phase clouds by two different inlets: ISI and Ice-CVI. The times
during which cloud particles were sampled by the ISI were identified using the cloud liquid water content (LWC)-data measured with
two PVM instruments (PSI and University of Manchester) and a CDP (University of Manchester) while the times when the Ice-CVI
sampled cloud particles were identified using the ice residual concentration measured with the CPC behind the Ice-CVI. The Ice-CVI
cloud events were classified according to the sample efficiency and properties of the Ice-CVI. This classification resulted in
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events, where mainly IN were measured; (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events, where the measurements were possibly influenced by secondary ice or
contamination by fragments of incoming snowflakes; and (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events, where hardly any ice residuals were detected. The (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events
are not included in the following analysis. Table 1 shows the identified cloud events with measurement time, number of acquired
mass spectra, event classification and weather conditions and cloud type. The meteorological situation during the whole campaign
was mainly influenced by low pressure systems with low temperatures.</p>
      <p>The occurrence of artifacts during the measurements using the Ice-CVI as well as the ISI is described in Worringen
et al. (2014). Aluminum oxide is an artifact of the measurements with the Ice-CVI and silicon oxide is an artifact of the
measurements with the ISI. The impaction plates of the Ice-CVI contain aluminum. When the ice crystals bounce on the impaction
plates of the Ice-CVI, some aluminum oxide particles are removed from these plates and can be carried with the air stream to the
analysis instrument. The ISI was calibrated with silicon oxide particles, which  remained in the system and occurred during the
measurements as artifacts. In our dataset it is difficult to distinguish between artifacts and a real component of a particle.
Therefore the peaks of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 (Al<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 (AlO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to the Ice-CVI measurements and the peak of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
28 (Si<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to the ISI measurements were ignored.</p>
      <p>In total, we measured 329 spectra during the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events (61 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement time) and 1335 spectra during the
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events (160 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement time) by using the Ice-CVI. Behind the ISI we measured 144 spectra during 35 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
measurement time.</p>
      <p>Figure 2 shows the results of the clustering algorithm for all ice particle residual measurements. The Ice-CVI data were analyzed
separately for all (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events (left pie chart) and for all (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events (middle pie chart). The right pie chart shows the
results for all ISI measurements. This analysis shows that the minerals group is one of the dominating fractions in IPR
composition measured by using the Ice-CVI during the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events (21 %) and the ISI (33 %). Interestingly, during the
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events minerals represent only a smaller fraction (6 %). We also detected lead containing particles, but only while
sampling through the Ice-CVI (12 % in the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) cases and 11 % in the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) cases). During the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events measured
behind the Ice-CVI, black carbon internally mixed with organic carbon (31 %) is one of the main fractions. Together with OC
(also 31 %), these two particle types represent 62 % of all IPR. It is worth noting that there are more similarities
between the Ice-CVI and ISI during (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events than the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events. A reason for that can be that the ISI measurements are
also influenced by secondary ice or incoming snowflakes. During the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events as well as during the ISI-events precipitation
occurred. On the other hand, the measurements at the ISI and the Ice-CVI were not done simultaneously, such that also differences
in the air mass origin could play a role here.</p>
      <p>Backward trajectories were calculated with CRISP (Klimach, 2012) with access to HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory Model, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; Draxler and Rolph, 2012, 2014), which was run using
GDAS (Global Data Assimilation System) meteorological dataset. The geographical origin of the air masses and change of altitude
during the transport can be used to infer whether the air masses are influenced by surface emissions or mainly characterized by
free tropospheric air and long distance transport. During all measurement episodes (total, Ice-CVI, ISI) the air masses approached
the measurement station from slightly different directions (Fig. 3). The air masses during the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events came primarily from
north-western directions from North America over France and during the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events additionally more from the North from
Scandinavia and Germany. The origin of the air masses during the measurements using the ISI are similar to those of the
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events but with a tendency towards southern directions (Fig. 3). During non-cloud episodes air masses approached the
measurement location from all directions.</p>
      <p>Previous measurements at the JFJ showed that there is an enrichment of mineral dust and black carbon in IPR composition (Mertes
et al., 2007; Cozic et al., 2008b; Kamphus et al., 2010). An enrichment of black carbon is not observed in our
measurements. Cziczo et al. (2009) found that lead-containing particles are also enriched in the IPR compared to the background
aerosol. Our measurements show also that mineral dust (measured behind the ISI and during the (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events) and lead (only
measured behind the Ice-CVI) is one of the dominating fractions in the IPR composition. Worringen et al. (2014) report on SEM
analyses of particles sampled during the same project behind the ISI and the Ice-CVI. They found lead in two states, namely
homogeneous lead-rich particles and small lead inclusions in particles of other material. While the small lead inclusions are not
considered as potential artifacts, the large lead-rich particles might be artifacts from mechanical re-suspension of lead
containing particles from the surface of the impaction plates of the Ice-CVI. In our case the lead-containing particles are
internally mixed with organics, minerals or other metals, therefore we interpret these particles as real atmospheric particles and
not as artifacts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Event-to-event variability</title>
      <p>Figure 4 shows the IPR chemical composition measured during five different events. Although the air masses sampled during all five
events have very similar origin and history of altitude (Fig. 5a and b) the chemical composition for each event is different from
the others. All air masses during these events arrived rising from a western direction to the measurement platform, such that the
chemical composition of these five events was probably influenced by local emissions.  During Event 3 and 4 the air masses arrived
from a south-western direction. This is reflected in the chemical composition: both events show organic carbon as the main
fraction and the amount of lead containing particles is comparable (13 % Event 3 and 15 % Event 4). The differences
between Event 3 and 4 are the absence of BC in Event 4 and of minerals in Event 3. The chemical composition of Event 12 is also
comparable to Event 4. In this case also the dominating fractions are OC, BioMinSal and minerals. The absence of lead containing
particles and presence of 3 % BC in Event 12 are the main differences between Event 12 and Event 4.</p>
      <p>Another reason for similarities and differences between these 5 events can be the temperature (Fig. 6). Events 3 and 4 have the
highest fraction of OC (nearly 50 % of the particles) and the highest temperatures (Event 3: average temperature
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>7.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; Event 4: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). In contrast to that, Event 12 has the highest amount
of minerals and the BioMinSal-type (64 %) and has an average temperature of about <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Event 4 has
also a high amount of “metal” components (minerals and BioMinSal 38 %) but by closer consideration of the BioMinSal-type it
can be shown that this type consists mostly of metal ions together with organic ions in Event 4 and only metal ion signals during
Event 12. Therefore the data indicate, that organic material dominates the IPR composition at higher temperatures and metal
components from mineral or salty origin dominate at lower temperatures. This finding is surprising, because previous studies found
that organics are ice active only at temperatures below <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Hoose and Möhler, 2012).  However, the organic
signal in the mass spectra might also originate from bioparticles, which would explain the ice formation at higher temperatures,
because bioparticles have been reported in the literature by many authors to be ice active at higher temperatures as previous
measurements show (e.g.  Möhler et al., 2008; Hoose and Möhler, 2012). An exception is Event 1.  During this event the
lowest temperatures (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>19.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) of all events prevailed, but a high relative amount of organic components
was measured (80 % BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OC and OC).  A reason for this high relative amount of organic material can be local emissions. At this
time the total particle data show a short period with high concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Fig. 7), which points to
local emissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Comparison between background aerosol particle composition and IPR</title>
      <p>During non-cloud phases the ALABAMA was connected to the total inlet to measure background aerosol particles.  Figure 8 shows the
averaged composition of all background aerosol particles along with the IPR composition measured behind the Ice-CVI during the
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events and behind the ISI. In comparison to the IPR composition, the measurements show a high fraction of black carbon
(18 %; Fig. 8) and only a minor fraction of BC/OC (4 %). The fraction of the particle type “BC/OC” in the background
aerosol is comparable to that in the IPR sampled by the ISI.  However, also the aerosol particles are dominated by the particle
types “organic carbon” (42 %) and “BioMinSal” (30 %). Previous high mountain-top measurements at the Storm Peak
Laboratory (SPL; 3200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in northern Colorado show also organic as the major component in the background aerosol
(DeMott et al., 2003; Cziczo, 2004). The differences as compared to the IPR compositions are the negligibly small amount (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) of lead-containing particles and the much smaller amount of minerals (about 1 %) than observed in the IPR. This is
partly in contrast to other measurements. Previous measurements with the ATOFMS at the Jungfraujoch as well as airborne
measurements over North America show 5 and 10 % lead-containing particles in the background aerosol (Murphy et al., 2007) but
also only a small amount of mineral dust or fly ash measured at the Storm Peak Laboratory (DeMott et al., 2003).</p>
      <p>Previous investigations show that the presence of a high potassium peak in the mass spectra in combination with organic carbon is
a marker for biomass burning (e.g. Pratt and Prather, 2010; Twohy et al., 2010; Corbin et al., 2012) or biogenic aerosol (e.g.
Trimborn, 2002; Pratt and Prather, 2010). Closer consideration of the three different carbon clusters (BC, BC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OC, OC) shows that
potassium is present in nearly every mass spectrum. In the background aerosol 45282 mass spectra including black or organic carbon
were measured: 92 % of all these mass spectra show potassium. The BC-type includes the mass spectra without potassium
(20 %; only 1 % in the OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>BC-type and 6 % in the OC-type). The same observation holds for the IPR composition: the
particle types including organic carbon measured by the use of the Ice-CVI as well as the ISI show more spectra including
potassium (94 % of all OC and OC<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>BC spectra while using the Ice-CVI and 98 % while using the ISI). Because of these results
spectra with a potassium peak cannot clearly be assigned to biomass burning or biological particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Influence of the air mass trajectories on the aerosol composition</title>
      <p>The chemical composition of the background (out-of-cloud) aerosol has been shown in Fig. 8. The high variability of the measured
IPR might be due to the different aerosol properties when air masses arrive from different geographic origin and/or different
altitudes at the Jungfraujoch. Therefore, we investigate here how air masses origin influences the aerosol properties. Because of
the saddle position of the JFJ, there are only two possibilities of how the air masses can approach the measurement platform
(Fig. 6). Predominantly, the air masses arrive from northwestern direction over the Swiss plateau (wind direction of
approx. 315<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Less frequently, the approach was from a southeastern direction from the inner Alps (approx. 135<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
via the Aletsch Glacier).  According to the direction from which air masses approach the measurement platform, the chemical
composition is influenced predominantly by anthropogenic and organic emissions or by mineral dust sources. To assess the influence
of origin and the average altitude of the air masses during their transport to the Jungfraujoch, we compare two time periods with
aerosol measurements using the total inlet (11 February and 19 February 2013). The chosen time periods exhibit nearly the same
relative humidity, potential wet bulb temperature and temperature (Fig. 6).</p>
      <p>Figure 9 shows the chemical composition of the aerosol particles for both time periods, along with corresponding
back-trajectories.  The comparison shows that more particles containing BC (internally mixed with ammonium or the BioMinSal-type)
and the BioMinSal-type are observed in the air masses arriving from a northwestern direction (19 February 2013), while the
measurements during the SE-event show more OC containing particles (internally mixed with ammonium or the BioMinSal-type). The
fraction of particles measured containing only potassium and pure organic carbon is very similar for both events.</p>
      <p>The air masses not only approached locally from different directions, but also had different long-range origins (see back
trajectories Fig. 9). The air masses measured on 19 February 2013 (NW-event) approached from the north over Germany. The chemical
composition of the measured particles is dominated by black carbon internally mixed with ammonium and the BioMinSal-type. In
contrast to the 19 February 2013, the air masses on 11 February 2013 that also originated mostly from the North but approached
over southern France, and from southern Europe (western Po Valley) contain higher amounts of OC and BioMinSal containing
particles. The vertical transport pathway of the air masses could be an indicator for a local, anthropogenic influence on chemical
composition. In contrast to the air masses from the north-western direction the air masses from the southeast have been lifted
from low altitudes, thereby bringing anthropogenic emissions (e.g., from the Po Valley) up to the altitude of the measurement
station. The air masses from the north-western direction stayed nearly at the same altitude for the last three days prior to the
measurement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Size distribution of IPR and background aerosol</title>
      <p>Ice-CVI and ISI both extract small ice particles in the size range from 5 to 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from mixed-phase clouds (Mertes
et al., 2007; Kupiszewski et al., 2014) while the upper cut-off of the total inlet was 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for wind speeds up to
20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Weingartner et al., 1999).  Figure 10 shows the size distributions of IPR measured with the ALABAMA (a, c,
e) and the Sky-OPC (b, d, f) compared with ESEM measurements (a–d). Figure 10a shows the size distributions of IPR measured by
ALABAMA and ESEM applying the Ice-CVI. Figure 10c the size distributions measured by ALABAMA and ESEM using the ISI. In Fig. 10b
and d, the corresponding size distributions measured with the Sky-OPC are shown.  Figure 10e and f shows the size distribution
measured by ALABAMA and the Sky-OPC using the total inlet. The measurement times for Ice-CVI and ISI are given in Table 1; the
measurements using the total inlet were done during all cloud-free periods. For all three inlets (total, Ice-CVI, ISI) the maximum
of the detected IPR measured with the ALABAMA and also with the Sky-OPC is in the size range of 300–650 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The IPR size
distributions measured by ALABAMA and SEM behind the Ice-CVI are in very good agreement (Fig. 10a). In contrast, the IPR size
distribution measured behind the ISI are somewhat different. (Fig. 10c): both distributions show two maxima, but the positions of
the maxima are not the same. The ALABAMA IPR distribution has a primary maximum in the size bin 0.4–0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
a secondary maximum in the size bin 1.3–1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The SEM IPR distribution both maxima are shifted to larger sizes. The
first maximum is in the 1–1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval and the second maximum is in the 2–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval.  However,
total count rates are very low, so this difference should not be overemphasized. Furthermore, SEM measures geometric diameters,
while the sizes determined by ALABAMA refer to the vacuum aerodynamic diameter. In contrast to the size distribution measured with
the ALABAMA and ESEM, the size distribution measured with Sky-OPC does not show a maximum but only a decreasing number
concentration of particles with increasing particle diameter from 100 to 500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This difference is a result of the
detection efficiency of the ALABAMA and ESEM, which is the highest around 400 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 10f shows that the background
aerosol particles have a size range of up to approximately 20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a higher number of smaller particles
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The relative amount of larger particles is (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) clearly elevated for the ice residuals,
both behind the ISI and Ice-CVI (Fig. 10b and d). Note that the measurements of background particles (out of cloud) and IPR were
conducted by definition at different times, such that the absolute amount of particles cannot be compared.</p>
      <p>As mentioned above, relatively more IPR larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed compared to the background aerosol
particles. The percentage of the background aerosol particles larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (vacuum aerodynamic diameter) measured
by ALABAMA was only 3 %, while 10–19 % of the IPR behind the Ice-CVI and ISI were larger than
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the chemical composition of these particles has been analyzed separately:</p>
      <p>Figure 11 shows the chemical composition of the IPR and background aerosol particles larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The IPR larger
than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured behind the Ice-CVI are dominated by minerals, OC (also mixed with BC) and the BioMinSal-type, but
lead containing particles are found to a similar percentage (15 %) as in all IPR (12 %, see Figs. 2 and 8).  OC is the
main fraction of the particles larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured behind the ISI. In the background aerosol supermicron
particles are dominated by the BioMinSal-type. The finding that the BioMinSal-cluster is one of the major components the IPR as
well as the background aerosol for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> strengthens the assumption that the metal ions detected in these mass
spectra are likely metal cations of primary aerosols like sea salt, minerals or biological particles, which are mainly found in
the coarse mode (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006).</p>
      <p>The size distribution allow also for an estimation of the ice active site (e.g., Vali, 2008) density of particles larger than
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to those smaller than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: assuming that each IPR corresponds to at least one ice active
site on the original aerosol particle (otherwise it would not have acted as an INP), we can estimate the ice active site density
for the particles analyzed by ALABAMA, separated for particles smaller than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and larger than 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
number of ice active sites per IPR surface (ice active site density) is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for particles with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Relating the number of ice
active sites to the total aerosol surface yields <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>7.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In both cases the ice active site density is larger for particles smaller than
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is an important finding and explains the high number of IPR found in the size range below
1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, it should be noted that the assumption that each IPR corresponds to one ice active site may
underestimate the number of ice active sites. In cases where more than one ice active site is found on the particles, also only
one ice crystal will form and one IPR will remain. Thus the estimated number yields a lower limit for the ice active sites.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>This paper presents results of the single particle measurements during the INUIT-JFJ/CLACE 2013 campaign conducted at the
Jungfraujoch in January/February 2013. In agreement with previous measurements at the Jungfraujoch (Chou et al., 2011; Kamphus
et al., 2010; Mertes et al., 2007), it was found that larger particles are more efficient ice nuclei. Specific analysis of only
those particles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed that the chemical composition of these larger particles is dominated by organic
material and the “BioMinSal” type, both in the IPR as well as in the background aerosol. Besides, the “minerals” group was
indicated as one of the main fractions in the IPR composition measured behind the Ice-CVI. From the finding that IPR have a higher
relative number of larger particles than the background aerosol particles we conclude and confirm a better ice nucleation ability
for the larger, primary aerosol particles such as minerals, salt and biological particles.</p>
      <p>In general, IPR are enriched in organic material, partly also internally mixed with BC. Additionally, minerals and lead were found
in IPR as has already been observed in previous measurements conducted at the JFJ (Mertes et al., 2007; Cozic et al., 2008b;
Cziczo et al., 2009; Kamphus et al., 2010; Ebert et al., 2011). In comparison to the composition of the IPR measured using the
Ice-CVI, the measured composition using the ISI is dominated by minerals, and no lead containing particles were found, while
12 % of the IPR sampled using the Ice-CVI included lead. In contrast to Cozic et al. (2008) we found no enrichment of pure
black carbon in the IPR composition. Only the chemical composition of the background aerosol particles shows a high fraction of
black carbon. These results comply with previous investigations (DeMott et al., 1999; Dymarska et al., 2006; Hoose and Möhler,
2012) describing black carbon as a good ice nuclei but only at lower temperatures and its ice nucleating ability appears to be
reduced if coatings by organic material or sulfuric acid are present. During the INUIT-JFJ/CLACE 2013 campaign the temperatures
were never lower than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C; see Fig. 6. In the background aerosol, the main particle fraction is also organic
carbon. The high amount of organic material in the background aerosol as well as in the IPR motivates further investigation of
different organic material by single particle mass spectrometry to better characterize the organic fraction. While there have been
previous observations that organic matter is of general importance for ice nucleation ability (DeMott et al., 2003; Cziczo et al.,
2004), recent laboratory studies have shown the importance of porous and glassy organic matter for ice nucleation (Murray et al.,
2010; Adler et al., 2013).</p>
      <p>The investigation of the influence of the temperature and the origin and altitude of the air masses on the chemical composition of
IPR and aerosol particles indicate that organic material dominates the IPR composition at higher temperatures and metal components
from mineral or salt at lower temperatures which is in contrast to previous findings (e.g.  Möhler et al., 2008; Hoose and
Möhler, 2012). It was illustrated that the origin (geographic and altitude) of the air masses influenced the chemical
composition of the aerosol particles. For the non-cloud aerosol, the particles sampled in air masses characterized by free
tropospheric air and long distance transport were found to be dominated by BC and single metal ions from salt, mineral or
biological sources (BioMinSal-type). These particle types were probably partly mixed with secondary inorganic components, because
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was detected in some spectra. In contrast to that, the particles in air masses which are influenced by surface
emissions are dominated by organic carbon and potassium.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Parameters underlying the clustering algorithm</title>
      <p>This section describes the cluster parameters of the software package CRISP. The chosen parameters are listed in Table A.</p>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>Normalization type and time</title>
      <p>To compensate for differences in the ionization efficiency, each mass spectrum is normalized to the sum of the signal intensities
with preservation of the relative relationship of the signals. By this, the influence of absolute signal intensity is
decreased. Absolute signal intensity is not needed because the laser ablation method does not measure quantitatively. The point at
which the normalization is applied in the analysis sequence can be chosen. In case of measuring both polarities the spectra of
both polarities are first merged, and normalization can be applied before, after or before and after concatenation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <title>Preprocessing type</title>
      <p>Preprocessing (before normalization) can be applied to increase mass signals with lower intensity with respect to signals with
a higher intensity, such that the presence of a certain <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has more significance than the signal intensity in the calculation
of the distance to the reference spectrum. Typically the square root of the signal intensities is used.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <title>Initialisation type</title>
      <p>This parameter defines the way the reference mass spectra are selected. Two options are available:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p><italic>find different startcluster</italic>:  different spectra are randomly selected according to certain criteria</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>random</italic>: reference spectra are chosen randomly</p></list-item></list>
Reference spectra can also be determined manually, however, this last option is not very useful for field data because the number
of particle types is unknown.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS4">
  <title>Number of cluster</title>
      <p>The result of the clustering is highly dependent on the pre-selected number of clusters. In the case that the number of clusters
is too small, some cluster types cannot be found, while in the case that the number is too large, too many similar spectra are
assigned to different clusters. In the fuzzy c-means algorithm all non-matched spectra are collected in a rest cluster.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS5">
  <title>Cluster difference</title>
      <p>This parameter determines the distance between the spectra which are chosen as start references at “find different
startcluster”.  The <italic>cluster difference</italic> is between 1 and 0, whereby a <italic>cluster difference</italic> of 1 means that the
chosen startclusters are identically. This distance results from the Pearson correlation and affects the number of the resulting
clusters. The number of clusters increases with increasing similarity of the references and is constant at a value of 0.7 (Roth,
2014). If the <italic>cluster difference</italic> is too small, the distinctions between the clusters are too large, resulting in too few
cluster types.  Thus, it is recommended to use more similar reference mass spectra and to summarize those clusters that show
similar mass spectra at the end of the clustering.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS6">
  <title>Fuzzifier and fuzzy abort</title>
      <p>The <italic>fuzzifier</italic> (also called <italic>fuzzy weighting</italic> exponent) is a dimension of fuzziness of the classification of the
cluster (1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <italic>fuzzifier</italic> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8; e.g.  Huang et al., 2012). The bigger the <italic>fuzzifier</italic>, the more inaccurate is the
assignment to the references, because the spectra cannot exactly be assigned to one cluster.  The distance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between
spectra <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and reference <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is weighted with:
            <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mstyle scriptlevel="+1"><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the <italic>fuzzifier</italic>. When the preprocessing option of CRISP is used, it has been found that the result of the
clustering is independent of the <italic>fuzzifier</italic> value (Roth, 2014).</p>
      <p>During the clustering, each mass spectrum is compared to the reference spectra in terms of distance, membership and
correlation. If these parameters fulfill the pre-selected criteria, the mass spectrum is sorted into the cluster represented by
the reference and the average spectrum is calculated again. Subsequently all mass spectra are compared again with the reference
spectra. This procedure is repeated until the criterion of abort (<italic>fuzzy abort</italic>) is reached, such that the clustering stops
when the value of the difference of all reference spectra between two iterations is smaller than the value defined by
<italic>fuzzy abort</italic>.</p>
      <p>For the data evaluation of the current dataset (both IPR and background aerosol particles) a mixture of manual and automatic
clustering was used. First, an automatic clustering was done with the parameters shown in Table A1.</p>
      <p>The rest cluster, containing the cluster with all spectra that did not fulfill the given parameters, was first clustered
automatically with a lower cluster difference (0.6) and the remaining spectra were sorted manually with a correlation factor
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by the DFG projects FOR 1525 (INUIT), SPP 1294 (HALO, grant Me 3524/1-2), the Max Planck Society, the
European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no 2662254 (ACTRIS TNA) and the Swiss National
Science Foundation (200021L 135356).</p><p>The authors gratefully acknowledge the NOAA Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the provision of the HYSPLIT transport and
dispersion model and/or READY website (<uri>http://www.ready.noaa.gov</uri>) used in this publication.</p><p>We would like to thank Swiss Meteorological Institute (MeteoSwiss) for providing meteorological measurements and the International
Foundation High Altitude Research Station Jungfraujoch and Gornergrat (HFSJG) for the opportunity to perform experiments at the
Jungfraujoch.  Additional thanks go to Oliver Appel (MPIC Mainz) for help with OPC error calculations, to Oliver Schlenczek
(University Mainz) for cloud observations at the JFJ and to Udo Kästner (TROPOS) for his help during the measurements at the
JFJ.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The service charges for this open-access publication <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> have been covered by the Max Planck Society.</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Abbatt, J. P., Benz, S., Cziczo, D. J., Kanji, Z., Lohmann, U., and Möhler, O.: Solid ammonium sulfate aerosols as
ice nuclei: a pathway for cirrus cloud formation, Science, 313, 1770–1773, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Adler, G., Koop, T., Haspel, C., Taraniuk, I., Moise, T., Koren, I., Heiblum, R. H., and Rudich, Y.: Formation of
highly porous aerosol particles by atmospheric freeze-drying in ice clouds, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 20414–20419,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation> Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S.,
O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds, Nature,
498, 355–358, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation> Bezdek, J. C., Ehrlich, R., and Full, W.: Fcm – the Fuzzy C-Means clustering-algorithm, Comput. Geosci., 10,
191–203, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation> Brands, M., Kamphus, M., Böttger, T., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Roth, A., Curtius, J., Voigt, C., Borbon, A.,
Beekmann, M., Bourdon, A., Perrin, T., and Borrmann, S.: Characterization of a newly developed aircraft-based laser ablation
aerosol mass spectrometer (ALABAMA) and first field deployment in urban pollution plumes over Paris during MEGAPOLI 2009,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 46–64, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation> Cantrell, W. and Heymsfield, A.: Production of ice in tropospheric clouds: a review, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 6,
795–807, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation> Chen, Y., Kreidenweis, S. M., McInnes, L. M., Rogers, D. C., and DeMott, P. J.: Single particle analyses of ice
nucleating aerosols in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1391–1394, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chou, C., Stetzer, O., Weingartner, E., Jurányi, Z., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Ice nuclei properties within a
Saharan dust event at the Jungfraujoch in the Swiss Alps, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4725–4738,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4725-2011">10.5194/acp-11-4725-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Corbin, J. C., Rehbein, P. J. G., Evans, G. J., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Combustion particles as ice nuclei in an urban
environment: evidence from single-particle mass spectrometry, Atmos. Environ., 51, 286–292, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cozic, J., Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Cziczo, D. J., Gallavardin, S. J., Walter, S., Baltensperger, U., and
Weingartner, E.: Black carbon enrichment in atmospheric ice particle residuals observed in lower tropospheric mixed phase
clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15209,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009266">10.1029/2007JD009266</ext-link>, 2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cozic, J., Verheggen, B., Weingartner, E., Crosier, J., Bower, K. N., Flynn, M., Coe, H., Henning, S.,
Steinbacher, M., Henne, S., Collaud Coen, M., Petzold, A., and Baltensperger, U.: Chemical composition of free tropospheric
aerosol for PM1 and coarse mode at the high alpine site Jungfraujoch, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 407–423,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-407-2008">10.5194/acp-8-407-2008</ext-link>, 2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J.: Observations of organic species and atmospheric ice formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L12116,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019822">10.1029/2004GL019822</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Cziczo, D. J., DeMott, P. J., Brock, C., Hudson, P. K., Jesse, B., Kreidenweis, S. M., Prenni, A. J., Schreiner, J.,
Thomson, D. S., and Murphy, D. M.: A method for single particle mass spectrometry of ice nuclei, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 37,
460–470, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Murphy, D. M., Hudson, P. K., and Thomson, D. S.: Single particle measurements of the chemical
composition of cirrus ice residue during CRYSTAL-FACE, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D04201,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004964">10.1029/2004JD004964</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Cziczo, D. J., Stetzer, O., Worringen, A., Ebert, M., Weinbruch, S., Kamphus, M., Gallavardin, S. J., Curtius, J.,
Borrmann, S., Froyd, K. D., Mertes, S., Möhler, O., and Lohmann, U.: Inadvertent climate modification due to anthropogenic
lead, Nat. Geosci., 2, 333–336, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M.: Characterization of individual airborne particles by using aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry at
Mace Head, Ireland, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D21302,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004747">10.1029/2004JD004747</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation> Dall'Osto, M. and Harrison, R.: Chemical characterisation of single airborne particles in Athens (Greece) by ATOFMS,
Atmos. Environ., 40, 7614–7631, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Highwood, E. J., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Querol, X., and Achterberg, E. P.:
Variation of the mixing state of Saharan dust particles with atmospheric transport, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3135–3146,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> De Foy, B., Smyth, A. M., Thompson, S. L., Gross, D. S., Olson, M. R., Sager, N., and Schauer, J. J.: Sources of
nickel, vanadium and black carbon in aerosols in Milwaukee, Atmos. Environ., 59, 294–301, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez, J. L.: Particle morphology and density
characterization by combined mobility and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part. 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38,
1185–1205, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J.: African dust aerosols as atmospheric ice nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1732,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017410">10.1029/2003GL017410</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> DeMott, P. J., Rogers, D. C., Kreidenweis, S. M., Chen, Y., Twohy, C. H., Baumgardner, D., Heymsfield, A. J., and
Chan, K. R.: The role of heterogeneous freezing nucleation in upper tropospheric clouds: inferences from SUCCESS,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1387–1390, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> DeMott, P. J., Chen, Y., Kreidenweis, S. M., Rogers, D. C., and Sherman, D. E.: Ice formation by black carbon
particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26, 2429–2432, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> DeMott, P. J., Cziczo, D. J., Prenni, A. J., Murphy, D. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Thomson, D. S., Borys, R., and
Rogers, D. C.: Measurements of the concentration and composition of nuclei for cirrus formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100,
14655–14660, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S.,
Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting global atmospheric nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate,
P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> Diehl, K., Quick, C., Matthias-Maser, S., Mitra, S. K., and Jaenicke, R.: The ice nucleating ability of pollen Part
I: Laboratory studies in deposition and condensation freezing mode, Atmos. Res., 58, 75–87, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> Diehl, K. and Wurzler, S.: Air parcel model simulations of a convective cloud: bacteria acting as immersion ice
nuclei, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4622–4628, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Diehl, K., Debertshäuser, M., Eppers, O., Schmithüsen, H., Mitra, S. K., and Borrmann, S.: Particle surface
area dependence of mineral dust in immersion freezing mode: investigations with freely suspended drops in an acoustic levitator
and a vertical wind tunnel, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12343–12355,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12343-2014">10.5194/acp-14-12343-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via
NOAA ARL READY Website,  available at: <uri>http://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri> (last access: 31 October 2014), NOAA Air
Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Dymarska, M., Murray, B. J., Sun, L., Eastwood, M. L., Knopf, D. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Deposition ice nucleation on
soot at temperatures relevant for the lower troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D04204,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006627">10.1029/2005JD006627</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Ebert, M., Worringen, A., Benker, N., Mertes, S., Weingartner, E., and Weinbruch, S.: Chemical composition and
mixing-state of ice residuals sampled within mixed phase clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2805–2816,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2805-2011">10.5194/acp-11-2805-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation> Fergenson, D. P., Pitesky, M. E., Tobias, H. J., Steele, P. T., Czerwieniec, G. A., Russell, S. C., Lebrilla, C. B.,
Horn, J. M., Coffee, K. R., Srivastava, A., Pillai, S. P., Shih, M.-T. P., Hall, H. L., Ramponi, A. J., Chang, J. T.,
Langlois, R. G., Estacio, P. L., Hadley, R. T., Frank, M., and Gard, E. E.: Reagentless detection and classification of
individual bioaerosol particles in seconds, Anal. Chem., 76, 373–378, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Frank, M., Gard, E. E., Tobias, H. J., Adams, K. L., Bogan, M. J., Coffee, K. R., Farquar, G. R., Fergenson, D. P.,
Martin, S. I., Pitesky, M., Riot, V. J., Srivastava, A., Steele, P. T., and Williams, A. M.: Single-particle aerosol mass
spectrometry (SPAMS) for high-throughput and rapid analysis of biological aerosols and single cells, ACS Symp. Ser., 1065,
161–196,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/bk-2011-1065.ch010">10.1021/bk-2011-1065.ch010</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Froyd, K. D., Murphy, D. M., Lawson, P., Baumgardner, D., and Herman, R. L.: Aerosols that form subvisible cirrus at
the tropical tropopause, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 209–218,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-209-2010">10.5194/acp-10-209-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation> Gerber, H.: Microphysics of marine stratocumulus clouds with two drizzle modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 1649–1662,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hartmann, S., Niedermeier, D., Voigtländer, J., Clauss, T., Shaw, R. A., Wex, H., Kiselev, A., and Stratmann, F.:
Homogeneous and heterogeneous ice nucleation at LACIS: operating principle and theoretical studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
1753–1767,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1753-2011">10.5194/acp-11-1753-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation> Hinz, K. P., Greweling, M., Drews, F., and Spengler, B.: Data processing in on-line laser mass spectrometry of
inorganic, organic, or biological airborne particles, Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom., 10, 648–660, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from
laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012">10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation> Huang, M., Xia, Z. X., Wang, H. B., Zeng, Q. H., and Wang, Q.: The range of the value for the fuzzifier of the fuzzy
c-means algorithm, Pattern Recogn. Lett., 33, 2280–2284, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation> Huang, M., Hao, L., Guo, X., Hu, C., Gu, X., Zhao, W., Wang, Z., Fang, L., and Zhang, W.: Characterization of
secondary organic aerosol particles using aerosol laser time-of-flight mass spectrometer coupled with FCM clustering algorithm,
Atmos. Environ., 64, 85–94, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation> Kamphus, M., Ettner-Mahl, M., Brands, M., Curtius, J., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Comparison of two aerodynamic
lenses as an inlet for a single particle laser ablation mass spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 42, 970–980, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Kamphus, M., Ettner-Mahl, M., Klimach, T., Drewnick, F., Keller, L., Cziczo, D. J., Mertes, S., Borrmann, S., and
Curtius, J.: Chemical composition of ambient aerosol, ice residues and cloud droplet residues in mixed-phase clouds: single
particle analysis during the Cloud and Aerosol Characterization Experiment (CLACE 6), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8077–8095,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010">10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation> Kandler, K., Lieke, K., Benker, N., Emmel, C., Küpper, M., Müller-Ebert, D., Ebert, M., Scheuvens, D.,
Schladitz, A., and Schütz, L.: Electron microscopy of particles collected at Praia, Cape Verde, during the Saharan Mineral
Dust Experiment: particle chemistry, shape, mixing state and complex refractive index, Tellus B, 63, 475–496, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation> Klimach, T.: Chemische Zusammensetzung der Aerosole – Design und Datenauswertung eines
Einzelpartikel-Laserablationsmassenspektrometers, Ph.D. thesis, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany,  2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation> Koop, T., Luo, B. P., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in
aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kupiszewski, P., Weingartner, E., Vochezer, P., Bigi, A., Rosati, B., Gysel, M., Schnaiter, M., and
Baltensperger, U.: The Ice Selective Inlet: a novel technique for exclusive extraction of pristine ice crystals in mixed-phase
clouds, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., 7, 12481–12515,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-12481-2014">10.5194/amtd-7-12481-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Lance, S., Brock, C. A., Rogers, D., and Gordon, J. A.: Water droplet calibration of the Cloud Droplet Probe (CDP)
and in-flight performance in liquid, ice and mixed-phase clouds during ARCPAC, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1683–1706,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1683-2010">10.5194/amt-3-1683-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation> Liu, P., Ziemann, P. J., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Generating particle beams of controlled dimensions and
divergence: I. Theory of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22, 293–313,
1995a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation> Liu, P., Ziemann, P. J., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Generating particle beams of controlled dimensions and
divergence: II. Experimental evaluation of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22,
314–324, 1995b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> Liu, P. S. K., Deng, R., Smith, K. A., Williams, L. R., Jayne, J. T., Canagaratna, M. R., Moore, K., Onasch, T. B.,
Worsnop, D. R., and Deshler, T.: Transmission efficiency of an aerodynamic focusing lens system: comparison of model
calculations and laboratory measurements for the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 721–733,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005">10.5194/acp-5-715-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation> Mertes, S., Lehmann, K., Nowak, A., Massling, A., and Wiedensohler, A.: Link between aerosol hygroscopic growth and
droplet activation observed for hill-capped clouds at connected flow conditions during FEBUKO, Atmos. Environ., 39, 4247–4256,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Walter, S., Connolly, P., Ebert, M., Schneider, J., Bower, K. N., Cozic, J.,
Weinbruch, S., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Counterflow virtual impactor based collection of small ice particles in
mixed-phase clouds for the physico-chemical characterization of tropospheric ice nuclei: sampler description and first case
study, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 848–864, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., DeMott, P. J., Vali, G., and Levin, Z.: Microbiology and atmospheric processes: the role of
biological particles in cloud physics, Biogeosciences, 4, 1059–1071,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1059-2007">10.5194/bg-4-1059-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Möhler, O., Georgakopoulos, D. G., Morris, C. E., Benz, S., Ebert, V., Hunsmann, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M.,
and Wagner, R.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation activity of bacteria: new laboratory experiments at simulated cloud conditions,
Biogeosciences, 5, 1425–1435,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-5-1425-2008">10.5194/bg-5-1425-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Hudson, P. K., Cziczo, D. J., Gallavardin, S., Froyd, K. D., Johnston, M. V., Middlebrook, A. M.,
Reinard, M. S., Thomson, D. S., Thornberry, T., and Wexler, A. S.: Distribution of lead in single atmospheric particles,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3195–3210,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3195-2007">10.5194/acp-7-3195-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation> Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., Dobbie, S., Cui, Z., Al-Jumur, S. M. R. K., Möhler, O., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R.,
Benz, S., Niemand, M., Saathoff, H., Ebert, V., Wagner, S., and Kärcher, B.: Heterogeneous nucleation of ice particles on
glassy aerosols under cirrus conditions, Nat. Geosci., 3, 233–237, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Murray, B. J., Broadley, S. L., Wilson, T. W., Atkinson, J. D., and Wills, R. H.: Heterogeneous freezing of water
droplets containing kaolinite particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4191–4207,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4191-2011">10.5194/acp-11-4191-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation> Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled
cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6519–6554, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Aircraft measurements of vertical profiles of aerosol mixing states,
J. Geophys. Res., 115, D11305,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013150">10.1029/2009JD013150</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation> Pratt, K. A., DeMott, P. J., French, J. R., Wang, Z., Westphal, D. L., Heymsfield, A. J., Twohy, C. H.,
Prenni, A. J., and Prather, K. A.: In situ detection of biological particles in cloud ice-crystals, Nat. Geosci., 2, 398–401,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation> Pratt, K. A., Heymsfield, A. J., Twohy, C. H., Murphy, S. M., DeMott, P. J., Hudson, J. G., Subramanian, R.,
Wang, Z., Seinfeld, J. H., and Prather, K. A.: In situ chemical characterization of aged biomass-burning aerosols impacting cold
wave clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2451–2468, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation> Prenni, A. J., Petters, M. D., Kreidenweis, S. M., Heald, C. L., Martin, S. T., Artaxo, P., Garland, R. M.,
Wollny, A. G., and Pöschl, U.: Relative roles of biogenic emissions and Saharan dust as ice nuclei in the Amazon basin,
Nat. Geosci., 2, 402–405, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation> Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, Kluwer Acedemic Publishers, Dodrecht,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation> Rogers, D. C., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., and Chen, Y. L.: Measurements of ice nucleating aerosols during
SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1383–1386, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Rolph, G. D.: Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstems (READY) Website
(<uri>http://ready.arl.noaa.gov</uri>), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation> Roth, A.: Untersuchungen von Aerosolpartikeln und Wolkenresidualpartikeln mittels Einzelpartikel-Massenspektrometrie
und optischen Methoden, Ph.D. thesis, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, John
Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Steinke, I., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Connolly, P., and Leisner, T.: A new temperature and humidity dependent
surface site density approach for deposition ice nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 18499–18539,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-18499-2014">10.5194/acpd-14-18499-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Trimborn, A.: Online analysis of atmospheric particles with a transportable laser mass spectrometer during LACE 98,
J. Geophys. Res., 107, 8132,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000590">10.1029/2001JD000590</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation> Twohy, C. H., DeMott, P. J., Pratt, K. A., Subramanian, R., Kok, G. L., Murphy, S. M., Lersch, T., Heymsfield, A. J.,
Wang, Z., Prather, K. A., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Relationships of biomass-burning aerosols to ice in orographic wave clouds,
J. Atmos. Sci., 67, 2437–2450, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Vali, G.: Repeatability and randomness in heterogeneous freezing nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5017–5031,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5017-2008">10.5194/acp-8-5017-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation> von Blohn, N., Mitra, S. K., Diehl, K., and Borrmann, S.: The ice nucleating ability of pollen, Atmos. Res., 78,
182–189, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>von der Weiden, S.-L., Drewnick, F., and Borrmann, S.: Particle Loss Calculator – a new software tool for the
assessment of the performance of aerosol inlet systems, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2, 479–494,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-2-479-2009">10.5194/amt-2-479-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Weingartner, E., Nyeki, S., and Baltensperger, U.: Seasonal and diurnal variation of aerosol size distributions
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at a high-alpine site (Jungfraujoch 3580 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), J. Geophys. Res., 104, 26809–26820,
1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation> Wendisch, M.: A quantitative comparison of ground-based FSSP and PVM measurements, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 15,
887–900, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wise, M. E., Baustian, K. J., Koop, T., Freedman, M. A., Jensen, E. J., and Tolbert, M. A.: Depositional ice
nucleation onto crystalline hydrated NaCl particles: a new mechanism for ice formation in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
12, 1121–1134,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012">10.5194/acp-12-1121-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Worringen, A., Kandler, K., Benker, N., Dirsch, T., Weinbruch, S., Mertes, S., Schenk, L., Kästner, U.,
Frank, F., Nillius, B., Bundke, U., Rose, D., Curtius, J., Kupiszewski, P., Weingartner, E., Schneider, J., Schmidt, S., and
Ebert, M.: Single-particle characterization of ice-nucleating particles and ice particle residuals sampled by three different
techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 23027–23073,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-23027-2014">10.5194/acpd-14-23027-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="App2.Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Date and time of the cloud events during which measurements were taken behind Ice-CVI or ISI, along with the number of the measured spectra, the evaluation of the Ice-CVI-events and the weather conditions and cloud formation during these events. The times of each cloud event based (a) on the particle counter operated behind the Ice-CVI or (b) on the liquid water content measured by two PVM instruments and a CDP outside the laboratory.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.63}[.63]?><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cloud event</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Inlet</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Evaluation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Weather conditions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(LT)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">of number</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">of the Ice</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">and clouds</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">spectra</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CVI-events</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>1</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>22 Jan 2013 02:00–13:05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">174</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Warm front occlusive low pressure system</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>2</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>27 Jan 2013 15:30–28 Jan 2013 10:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">78</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Occlusive frontal system, Ns</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>3</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>29 Jan 2013 01:30–23:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Unstable warm front;  first Ns than Cb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>4</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>30 Jan 2013 16:00–31 Jan 2013 01:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">39</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Squall line at cold front;  Cb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>5</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mtext>a,b</mml:mtext></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>31 Jan 2013 17:30–3 Feb 2013 11:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ISI/CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">27 (ISI)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">31 Jan: cellular convection;  Cu</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1117 (CVI)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1–2 Feb: frontal wave;  Ns and Cb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Until 3 Feb cellular convection; Cb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>6</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>5 Feb 2013 14:45–6 Feb 2013 05:06</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Squall line at postfrontal convergence line;  Cb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>7</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>6 Feb 2013 08:30–8 Feb 2013 12:50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">6 Feb: Convective dominating low-pressure vortex;  Cb</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">From 7 Feb on: cellular convection;  Cu</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>8</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>8 Feb 2013 22:30–9 Feb 2013 19:00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">44</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Diamond dust and cellular convection at convergence</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">line;  Ci, Cu (Cb)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>9</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>10 Feb 2013 16:00–23:50</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Approaching warm front;  Ci, Cs, As</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>10</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>11 Feb 2013 06:20–12 Feb 2013 06:30</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Warm front;  Ns</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>11</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>12 Feb 2013 16:00–13 Feb 2013 01:20</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Back of a low with northeast stream;  Ns, Ac, As</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>12</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>14 Feb 2013 16:00–16 Feb 2013 01:05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ISI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">114</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Low pressure system;  As, Cu, Cb, Ac</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>13</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>19 Feb 2013 15:00–20 Feb 2013 19:05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CVI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Cold front from North;  Ac, Ns, Sc, Cu</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>14</bold></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>24 Feb 2013 02:00–25 Feb 2013 18:40</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ISI</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Approaching warm front with precipitation;  Cs, As, Ns</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \hack{
\setlength\tabularwidth{0.9\tabularwidth}
}?><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.7}[.7]?><table-wrap-foot><p>Ac: altocumulus; As: altostratus; Cb: cumulonimbus; Ci: cirrus; Cs: cirrostratus; Cu: cumulus; Ns: nimbostratus; Sc: stratocumulus.</p></table-wrap-foot><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></table-wrap>

    <?xmltex \hack{\appendixtables}?><?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="App2.Ch1.T2"><caption><p>Chosen clustering parameter.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Preprocessing type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Power each <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Preprocessing power</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Normalization type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sum</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cluster difference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7 (0.6)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Distance</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Correlation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fuzzifier</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fuzzy abort</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.0001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Average mass spectra of each particle type. <bold>(a)</bold> black carbon; <bold>(b)</bold> organic carbon; <bold>(c)</bold> black carbon internally mixed with organic carbon; <bold>(d)</bold> lead containing particles; <bold>(e)</bold> industrial metals; <bold>(f)</bold> BioMinSal; <bold>(g)</bold> minerals.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f01.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Results of the IPR composition analysis. Left and middle: measurements behind the Ice-CVI (left: all (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events;  middle: all (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events).  Right: IPR composition measured behind the ISI.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f02.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>72 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectories calculated with CRISP/HYSPLIT (one trajectory every 6 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f03.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Comparison of the composition analysis of five events measuring behind the Ice-CVI (all (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)-events, Event 1: 22 January 2013 02:00–13:05;  Event 2: 27 January 2013 15:30–28 January 2013 10:30;  Event 3: 29 January 2013 01:30–23:00 and Event 4: 30 January 2013 16:00–31 January 2013 01:00) and the ISI (Event 12: 14 February 2013 18:10–16 February 2013 01:05) together with the corresponding average temperature during each event.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f04.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F5"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> 72 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectories (one trajectory every three hours) calculated with CRISP for each event. <bold>(b)</bold> The altitudes of air masses reaching the Jungfraujoch as a function of time, converted to pressure units.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f05.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Wind direction, relative humidity, potential wet-bulb temperature and temperature over the whole measurement period (data from MeteoSwiss at the JFJ station). Black lines denote the events with different air mass origin. Events highlighted with blue bars denote the 5 different events from Sect. 2.1.1.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f06.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Particle number concentrations measured during the INUIT-JFJ/CLACE 2013 campaign by two different condensation particle counters (CPC): the GAW-CPC which is located directly behind the total inlet, and a TSI 3010 that was operated with a much longer sampling line (approx. 7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) next to one of the aerosol mass spectrometers. Short elevated concentrations indicate local emissions. Events highlighted with blue bars denote the 5 different events from Sect. 2.1.1.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f07.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F8"><caption><p>Comparison between the chemical composition of background aerosol particles (left) and IPR measured behind Ice-CVI (middle) and ISI (right).</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f08.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Comparison of two events measured during non-cloud episodes. The northwestern event (NW;  blue) was on 19 February 2013 14:00–16:14 and the southeastern event (SE;  red) was on 11 February 2013 10:32–14:27.  72 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> back trajectories were calculated with one trajectory every 2 h.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f09.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Measured size distribution of the IPR and background aerosol particles with the ALABAMA (bars;  <bold>a</bold>,
<bold>c</bold>, <bold>e</bold>) and Sky-OPC (bars;  <bold>b</bold>, <bold>d</bold>, <bold>f</bold>) compared with the off-line SEM analysis of IPR
samples (line; <bold>a–d</bold>). The error bars for the ALABAMA data result from counting statistics (averaged errors;
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Ice-CVI</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %;  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ISI</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>8.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %;  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). The error of
the OPC data results from Gaussian propagation of uncertainty, including counting statistics, the manufacturer-given error of
the OPC of 3 %, and the error of the enrichment factor (4 % for the Ice-CVI and 20 % for the ISI). The error of the
ESEM dataset was determined by counting statistics. Note the different axis scaling. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is linear in <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and logarithmic in <bold>(b, d, f)</bold>. The <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis range is 100–2500 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <bold>(b, d, f)</bold>.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f10.pdf"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Chemical composition of IPR and background aerosol particles larger than 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measured behind the Ice-CVI (red), ISI (grey) and total inlet (blue). The error bars results from counting statistics.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/4677/2015/acpd-15-4677-2015-f11.pdf"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
