<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\sloppy}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACPD</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACPD</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1680-7375</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acpd-15-22701-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Observation of a tidal effect on the Polar Jet Stream</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Observation of a~tidal effect on the Polar Jet Stream}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~H.~Best and R.~Madrigali}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Best</surname><given-names>C. H.</given-names></name>
          <email>clive.best@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Madrigali</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Independent Scientist, Huntingdon, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Independent Scientist, Grosseto, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">C. H. Best (clive.best@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>25</day><month>August</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>16</issue>
      <fpage>22701</fpage><lpage>22713</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>20</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Variations in the Polar Jet Stream directly affect weather across Europe and North America (Francis et al., 2012). Jet Stream
dynamics are governed by the development of planetary Rossby waves (Dickinson, 1978) driven by variation of the Coriolis force
with latitude. Here we show that increasing atmospheric tides induce the development of Rossby waves, especially during winter
months. This changes the flow and direction of the Jet Stream, as measured by the Arctic Oscillation (AO). Although horizontal
tidal forces are tiny (10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than gravity), they act over huge areas dragging the Jet Stream flow southwards in
regular pulses as the earth rotates. This induces a changing Coriolis torque, which then distorts the Jet Stream flow.  The data
from eight recent winters are studied indicating that the AO is anti-correlated to the horizontal “tractional” component of
tides acting between latitude 45 and 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. The observed 28 day cycle in Jet Stream flow and extent has
a statistical significance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %.  A cross-correlation between all daily AO data since 1950 and the tractional tidal
strength shows a significant anti-correlation with a lag time of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days. The strongest correlation and largest
excursions of the AO are observed during winter 2005/2006 – a maximum lunar standstill year.  This declination dependence of
tidal forces at high latitudes is the proposed cause of many previous reports of an 18.6 year dependence of continental
rainfall and drought.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Varying tidal forces act both on the oceans and atmosphere particularly at high latitudes. A detailed study (Lindzen, 1981) of
atmospheric tides finds that gravitational lunar tidal winds are more important at high altitudes.  The horizontal “tractional”
component of net tides is responsible for tidal currents in the ocean and for tidal winds in the upper atmosphere.  During
northern winters the Jet Stream strengthens and shifts northwards.  Meanders or Rossby waves (Dickinson, 1978) develop near the
eastern edges of continental landmasses and oceans. Solar insolation falls each winter to zero inside the Arctic Circle while
simultaneously the diurnal solar “expansion” tide disappears over Polar Regions. Gravitational atmospheric tides now dominate
near the poles.</p>
      <p>Winter storms in the North Atlantic form at the interface where warm Gulf air meets cold Polar air near Newfoundland. This
temperature gradient produces baroclinic instability spawning storms that move westward across the Atlantic. The track of these
storms follows the Jet Stream and their impact on Europe depends both on their strength and the relative position of the Jet
Stream (Francis, 2012). Previous studies (Currie, 1983, 1984; Agosta, 2014; Clegg, 1984) have shown an 18.6 year cycle in
rainfall across large continental zones implying a dependence of storm formation on the lunar precession. Others have speculated
about a tidal influence on climate over decadal timescales (Ray, 2007). Changes in lunar declination through the 18.6 year cycle
mainly affect the strength and sidereal rate of change of tidal forces with latitude.</p>
      <p>The cold winter of 2010 corresponded to a Jet Stream positioned lower over the UK drawing cold air down from the North and
East. A negative value of the Arctic Oscillation (Thompson, 1998) corresponds to a low-pressure difference between the Icelandic
Low and the Azores High resulting in a weaker Jet Stream with larger meandering loops. This allows cold air to spill down from the
Arctic and Siberia into mid latitudes. During the winter of 2013/2014 a strong Jet Stream was positioned directly over the UK and
a string of powerful storms caused extensive coastal flooding. It was striking how several of these storms also coincided with
high spring tides, for example those of 5 December 2013 and 5 January 2014.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>It is the horizontal (tractional) component of tides that produces deep ocean currents and atmospheric pressure gradients in the
atmosphere. Can these also affect the Jet Stream flow? To investigate this possibility further, we have calculated the time
dependence of tractional tidal forces acting at different latitudes using the JPL ephemeris (Standish, 1990).  During northern
winters the maxima of such forces occur at each new moon and their strength depends on the relative positions of the earth, moon
and sun.  Although these tractional forces are only about 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> times the strength of the earth's gravitational acceleration
g, they are still important because they are unaffected by the earth's gravity. These changing tidal forces sweep across the earth
daily, generating a variable pull on the Jet Stream of several tons per kilometre.</p>
      <p>Figure 1 shows the variation of the AO index compared to calculations of the tidal tractional forces acting at 60 and
45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N for the last 6 winters (see Appendix). These results show visual evidence of an AO signal aligned with the lunar
cycle, although not always consistent in time. The approximate 28 day cycle is still however rather striking. A calculation of
the correlation between AO and tidal force at 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N gives a value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 between October 2009 and March 2010.</p>
      <p>To investigate further, we also looked at the recent maximum lunar standstill, which occurred in 2005/06 and resulted in the
largest monthly variations of tidal forces for Polar regions. If tractional tides affect the Jet Stream flow one would expect to
see a maximum correlation between AO and tidal forces during the 2005/06 winter months. Figure 2a shows the result.  There are
indeed large swings in the AO, which are again anti-correlated with tractional tidal forces. In particular the coincidence with
the 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N component is striking. This strong tidal effect may also provide an explanation for the many reports that
rainfall and droughts in northern continents follow an 18.6 year cycle (Francis and Vavrus, 2012; Currie, 1983; Agosta,
2014), since the path and strength of storms depend on changes in the flow and direction of the Jet
Stream. In 2006 there were net swings of the AO index through absolute values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between consecutive new moons. Figure 2b
shows the same results for the current winter 2014/2015, which included a total eclipse of the sun on 20 March coincident with the
moon at perihelion (super-moon) resulting in exceptional high tides.</p>
      <p>A large negative swing in the AO occurred in coincidence with the 2015 eclipse, with a regular anti-correlated beat
beforehand. A very similar situation can be observed for the total eclipse, which occurred on 7 March 1970, and which also
happened to be near a lunar standstill (Fig. 2c).  The effect is even more striking.</p>
      <p>How statistically significant are these observations? Firstly a cross-correlation analysis was performed between all daily AO
values, from 1950 to 2015, and the calculated tractional tidal acceleration at latitudes 45 and 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N for each
day. This long time series covers more than 23 800 days. Figure 3 shows the resultant cross-correlation as a function of the
tidal lag time. There is a small yet statistically unambiguous anti-correlation of the AO which peaks at a lag time of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days with the tides. The effect is strongest for the 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N component. This confirms that a tidal influence on the Polar
Jet stream flow exists, as measured by the AO. The strongest effect occurs, on average, 5 days after a major spring tide. The
absolute values of the anti-correlation may be small but the observation of such a continuous time lagged tidal effect on the AO
is statistically overwhelming.</p>
      <p>As a second test, we analysed just the lunar cycles between December and the end of March for the 8 most recent winters presented
in Figs. 1 and 2.  Some 40 out of 46 lunar cycles show a visible anti-correlation of the AO with tidal traction. Maxima in tidal
traction consistently shift the AO towards negative values, which then relax during tidal minima. The probability of such a run of
40/46 lunar cycles occurring randomly is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, based on an optimistic estimate of a 50 % chance that a single
anti-correlation might occur at random.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>The evolution of the Jet Stream and generation of Rossby waves is an immensely complicated process. Winter weather in the Northern
Hemisphere is dominated by the strength and flow direction of the Jet Stream. The intensity of flow varies from one year to
another. The Arctic Oscillation is just one scalar measurement of this evolution. Despite this, we have demonstrated that there is
strong statistical evidence of a sidereal tidal effect on the AO, especially during winter months. Strong tides increase the
southward drag on the Jet Stream generating a Coriolis torque as the tides sweep east–west around the rotating earth, perhaps
playing a role in triggering storms. It is noticeable how many of the damaging UK winter storms of 2013/2014
also coincided with high spring tides. The total effect depends both on the maxima and on the rate of change of the tractional
tidal component. These both vary within the 18.6 year lunar cycle. The work reported here provides strong evidence that
increasing tractional tidal forces do change the direction and speed of the Jet Stream, especially during winter months with a lag
time of about 5 days. One of the authors has been using tidal variations combined with ECMWF (2013) models to improve short to
medium-term weather forecasting (Madrigali, 2013). It is therefore proposed that the accuracy of medium-range weather forecasting
would be improved by including quantitative gravitational tidal forcing on the Polar Jet Stream into Global Circulation Models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.Sx1"><label/>
  <title>Tractional tides</title>
      <p>The tractional (tangential) tidal force at any point <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> whose
position vector subtends an angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the lunar position vector
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as in Fig. A1.</p>
      <p>The net force per unit mass acting on point <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, assuming
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is simply

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>≅</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        However for finite angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the tidal force acquires a vertical component (Fig. A2).</p>
      <p>The distance <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Gravity acting on point <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is therefore

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The tidal force now has 2 components

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex4"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        and

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex5"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex6"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        and

              <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.Ex7"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The tractional component (parallel to the surface) can be calculated using the JPL ephemeris to derive the net lunar-solar tidal
vector for any given date and time. All computer software used is available from the authors on request (see also Supplement).<?xmltex \hack{\\}?></p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?><bold>Note:</bold> A simulation of tractional tides experienced during the winter period 2005/2006 can be viewed at
<uri>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rebJTFo3XQQ</uri>.</p><supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-22701-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/acpd-15-22701-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p>Calculations by C. H. Best 2015.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Agosta, E. A.: The 18.6-year nodal tidal cycle and the bi-decadal
precipitation oscillation over the plains to the east of subtropical Andes,
South America, Int. J. Climatol., 35, 1606–1614, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Clegg, S. L. and Wigley, T. M. L.: Periodicities in North-East China,
1470–1979, Geopys. Res. Lett., 11, 1219–1222, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Currie, R. G.: Detection of 18.6 year nodal induced drought in the Patagonian
Andes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 10, 1089–1092, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Currie, R. G.: On bistable phasing of 18.6 year nodal induced flood in India,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 11, 50–53,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/GL011i001p00050">10.1029/GL011i001p00050</ext-link>,
1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Dickinson, R. E.: Rossby waves–long-period oscillations of oceans and
atmospheres, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 10, 159–195, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasting (ECMWF): Integrated
Forecasting System Documentation, ECMWF, Reading, UK, November 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Francis, J. A. and Vavrus, S. J.: Evidence linking arctic amplification to
extreme weather in mid-latitudes, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L06801,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051000">10.1029/2012GL051000</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Lindzen, R. S.: Turbulence and stress owing to gravity wave and tidal
breakdown, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 9707–9714, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Madrigali, R.: The Future of the Earth is Written on the Moon, Aracne,
Ariccia, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Met Office Report: Winter 2013/14, Met Office CEH Report, “The Recent Storms and
Floods in the UK”, Met Office Publication, Exeter, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Ray, R. D.: Decadal climate variability: is there a tidal connection?, J. Climate, 20, 3542–3560, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Standish Jr., E. M.: The observational basis for JPL's DE 200, the planetary
ephemerides of the Astronomical Almanac, Astron. Astrophys. 233, 252–271,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J. and Wallace, J. M.: The Arctic oscillation signature in
the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 25, 1297–1300, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Comparison of the Arctic Oscillation (AO) with tractional
tidal forces acting at
60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (blue) and 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (green) for the last six winters 2009–2014.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015-f01.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F2"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Variations in the AO which show an anti-correlation
with the tractional tidal forces at 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (green) and 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
(blue) during the Maximum lunar standstill (2005/2006).
<bold>(b)</bold> A similar study for the current Winter 2014/2015. A steep drop
in AO is observed coincident with the solar eclipse on 20 March.
<bold>(c)</bold> A previous total eclipse, which occurred on 7 March 1970 and
produced a similar steep drop in AO. Lunar declination in 1970 was near
maximum.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{height=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015-f02.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Cross-correlation of the Arctic Oscillation with tractional Tidal
acceleration since 1950. The green values are for the tractional
acceleration at 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and the gold values are those for 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N. Both are
anti-correlated to the AO with a time lag. The 45<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N component in particular
shows a lag time peaking at 5 days.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015-f03.png"/>

    </fig>

    <?xmltex \hack{\appendixfigures}?>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Schematic of the Earth-Moon system.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015-f04.png"/>

    </fig>

      <fig id="App2.Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Evaluation of angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
      <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/15/22701/2015/acpd-15-22701-2015-f05.png"/>

    </fig>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
