References

ACPD

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions

ACPD

Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.

1680-7375

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acpd-14-18943-2014

Long-term observation of aerosol–cloud relationships in the Mid-Atlantic of the United States

¹ Joseph

¹ Min

² Yin

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-0899

Howard University, 2355 6th Street, NW, Washington DC, 20059, USA

Atmospheric Sciences Research Center, State University of New York at Albany, Albany, NY 12203, USA

21 07 2014

14 13 18943 18960

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/14/18943/2014/acpd-14-18943-2014.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/14/18943/2014/acpd-14-18943-2014.pdf

Long-term ground-based observations (2006 to 2010) of aerosol and cloud properties derived from passive radiometric sensors deployed at an atmospheric measurement field station in the Baltimore–Washington corridor operated by Howard University were used to examine aerosol indirect effect on cloud optical depth (COD), liquid water path (LWP), cloud droplets effective radius (Re) and cloud droplets number concentration (Nd). A higher frequency of clouds with large COD (> 20) and small Re (< 7 m) was found during summer of 2006 and 2007 along with higher frequency of abundant aerosol loading. The five-year data are screened for summer months only and are separated into clean and polluted cases based on aerosol particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤ 2.5 m (PM2.5) value. Evidence of aerosol indirect effect is found where for polluted cases the mean and median values of COD and Nd distributions were elevated while the mean and median values of Re were decreased. Further reinforcing this conclusion is the result that the mean and median values of LWP distributions did not show prominent difference between clean and polluted cases, this implies that differences between the two cases of influential factors on cloud properties were relatively controlled. Moreover aerosol indirect effects were found insignificant when LWP was small but significant when LWP was large through the analysis of sensitivity of Nd to LWP under different aerosol loading and the measurements of aerosol size distribution.

NA11SEC4810003

References 1

Ackerman, A. S., Kirkpatrick, M. P., Stevens, D. E., and Toon, O. B.: The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing, Nature, 432, 1014–1017, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature03174">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03174</a>, 2004.

Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosol, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227</a>, 1989.

Bennartz, R.: Global assessment of marine boundary later cloud droplet number concentration from satellite, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D02201, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007547">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007547</a>, 2007.

Boers, R., Acarreta, J. A., and Gras, J. L.: Satellite monitoring of the first indirect aerosol effect: retrieval of the droplet con-centration of water clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D22208, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006838">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006838</a>, 2006.

Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R., Feingold, G., Trainer, M., Freitas, S. R., Kowal, D., Ayers, J.K., Prins, E., Minnis, P., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G. J., and Hsie, E.-Y.: Effect of biomass burning on marine stratocumulus clouds off the California coast, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8841–8856, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8841-2009">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8841-2009</a>, 2009.

Coakley, J. A. and Walsh, C. D.: Limits to the aerosol indirect radiative effect derived from observations of ship tracks, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 668–680, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0668:LTTAIR>2.0.CO;2">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059<0668:LTTAIR>2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002.

Crumeyrolle, S., Chen, G., Ziemba, L., Beyersdorf, A., Thornhill, L., Winstead, E., Moore, R. H., Shook, M. A., Hudgins, C., and Anderson, B. E.: Factors that influence surface PM2.5 values inferred from satellite observations: perspective gained for the US Baltimore-Washington metropolitan area during DISCOVER-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2139–2153, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2139-2014">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2139-2014</a>, 2014.

Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Ramaprasad, J., and Kaufman, Y. J.: Analysis of smoke impact on clouds in Brazilian biomass burning regions: an extension of Twomey's approach, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 22907–22922, 2001.

Feingold, G., Eberhard, W., Veron, D., and Previdi, M.: First measurements of the Twomey indirect effect using ground-based remote sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1287, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016633">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016633</a>, 2003.

Feingold, G., Furrer, R., Pilewskie, P., Remer, L. A., Min, Q., and Jonsson, H.: Aerosol indirect effect studies at southern Great Plains during the May 2003 intensive operations period, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D05S14, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005648">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005648</a>, 2006.

Han, Q., Rossow, W. B., and Lacis, A. A.: Near global survey of effective droplet radii in liquid water clouds using ISCCP data, J. Climate, 7, 465–497, 1994.

Han, Q., Rossow, W. B., Chou, J., and Welch, R. M.: Global variation of cloud effective droplet concentration of low-level clouds, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1419–1422, 1998.

Harrison, L. and Michalsky, J.: Objective algorithms for the retrieval of optical depths from ground-based measurements, Appl. Optics, 33, 5126–5132, 1994.

Harrison, L., Michalsky, J., and Berndt, J.: Automated multifilter rotating shadow-band radiometer: an instrument for optical depth and radiation measurements, Appl. Optics, 33, 5118–5125, 1994.

Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanré, D, Buis, J. P., Setzer, A., Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F., Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A: AERONET – a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16, 1998.

Kim, B.-G., Schwartz, S. E., Miller, M. A., and Min, Q.: Effective radius of cloud droplets by ground-based remote sensing: relationship to aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4740, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003721">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003721</a>, 2003.

Kim, B.-G., Miller, M. A., Schwartz, S. E., Liu, Y., and Min, Q.: The role of adiabaticity in the aerosol first indirect effect, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D05210, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008961">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008961</a>, 2008.

Kim, Y.-J., Kim, B.-G., Miller, M., Min, Q., and Song, C.-K.: Enhanced aerosol–cloud relationships in more stable and adiabatic clouds, Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 48, 283–293, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13143-012-0028-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-012-0028-0</a>, 2012.

Lebsock, M. D., Stephens, G. L., and Kummerow, C.: Multisensor satellite observations of aerosol effects on warm clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15205, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009876">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009876</a>, 2008.

Lee, S. S., Penner, J. E., and Saleeby, S. M.: Aerosol effects on liquid-water path of thin stratocumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D07204, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010513">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010513</a>, 2009.

McComiskey, A. and Feingold, G.: The scale problem in quantifying aerosol indirect effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1031–1049, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1031-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1031-2012</a>, 2012.

Min, Q. and Harrison, L.: Cloud properties derived from surface MFRSR measurements and comparison with GOES results at the ARM SGP site, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 1641–1644, 1996.

Min, Q. and Duan, M.: Simultaneously retrieving cloud optical depth and effective radius for optically thin clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D21201, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006136">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006136</a>, 2005.

Min, Q., Duan, M., and Marchand, R., Validation of surface retrieved cloud optical properties with in situ measurementsat the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program (ARM) South Great Plains site, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4547, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003385">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003385</a>, 2003.

Min, Q., Joseph, E., Lin, Y., Min, L., Yin, B., Daum, P. H., Kleinman, L. I., Wang, J., and Lee, Y.-N.: Comparison of MODIS cloud microphysical properties with in-situ measurements over the Southeast Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 11261–11273, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11261-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11261-2012</a>, 2012.

Nzeffe, F., Joseph, E., and Min, Q.: Surface-based observation of aerosol indirect effect in the Mid-Atlantic region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L22814, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036064">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL036064</a>, 2008.

Rogers, R. R. and Yau, M. K.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics, Int. Ser. Nat. Philos., 113, 290, 1989.

Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08281">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08281</a>, 2009.

Storelvmo, T., Kristjánsson, J. E., Myhre, G., Johnsrud, M., and Stordal, F.: Combined observational and modeling based study of the aerosol indirect effect, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3583–3601, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3583-2006">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3583-2006</a>, 2006.

Turner, D. D., Vogelmann, A. M., Johnson, K., Miller, M., Austin, R. T., Barnard, J. C., Flynn, C., Long, C., McFarlane, S. A., Cady-Pereira, K., Clough, S. A., Chiu, J. C., Khaiyer, M. M., Liljegren, J., Lin, B., Minnis, P., Marshak, A., Matrosov, S. Y., Min, Q., O'Hirok, W., Wang, Z., and Wiscombe, W.: Thin liquid water clouds: their importance and our challenge, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 177–190, 2007.

Twohy, C. H., Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Stevens, B., Tahnk, W., Wetzel, M., Russell, L., and Burnet, F.: Evaluation of the aerosol indirect effect in marine stratocumulus clouds: droplet number, size, liquid water path, and radiative impact, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D08203, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005116">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005116</a>, 2005.

Twomey, S.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8, 1251– 1256, 1974.

Westwater, E. R., Han, Y., Shupe, M. D., and Matrosov, S. Y.: Analysis of integrated cloud liquid and precipitable water vapor retrievals from microwave radiometers during the Surface Heat Budget of the Arctic Ocean project, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 32019–32030, 2001.

Wood, R. and Hartmann, D. L.: Spatial variability of liquid water path in marine boundary layer clouds: the importance of mesoscale cellular convection, J. Climate, 19, 1748–1764, 2006.

Zheng, X., Albrecht, B., Minnis, P., Ayers, K., and Jonson, H.: Observed aerosol and liquid water path relationships in marine stratocumulus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L17803, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044095">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044095</a>, 2010.