<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-9721-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>The importance of aerosol and droplet microphysics for the properties and life cycle of radiation fog in the Po Valley</article-title><alt-title>Aerosol and droplet microphysics  in the Po Valley</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>Hao</given-names></name>
          <email>hao.ding@misu.su.se</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Neuberger</surname><given-names>Almuth</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9697-3058</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Ranjan</surname><given-names>Rahul</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7141-9060</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Mattsson</surname><given-names>Fredrik</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1850-2760</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Heikkinen</surname><given-names>Liine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-967X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Mansour</surname><given-names>Karam</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0588-9411</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Decesari</surname><given-names>Stefano</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6486-3786</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3 aff5 aff6">
          <name><surname>Mohr</surname><given-names>Claudia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3291-9295</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Pérez</surname><given-names>Alejandro Baró</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Mastroianni</surname><given-names>Nazario</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zieger</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7000-6879</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Riipinen</surname><given-names>Ilona</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Ekman</surname><given-names>Annica M. L.</given-names></name>
          <email>annica.ekman@misu.su.se</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5940-2114</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Atmospheric Science and Climate, National Research Council of Italy, Bologna, Italy</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Center for Energy and Environmental Sciences, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>b</label><institution>now at: Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hao Ding (hao.ding@misu.su.se) and Annica M. L. Ekman (annica.ekman@misu.su.se)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>9721</fpage><lpage>9739</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Hao Ding et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e229">Employing high-resolution Large Eddy Simulation (LES) coupled with interactive aerosol and cloud microphysics schemes, this study investigates the influence of aerosol and droplet microphysics on the life cycle and properties of wintertime radiation fog in the Po Valley, Italy. For the simulated case, the results show that the main drivers of radiation fog onset and dissipation are nocturnal longwave cooling and surface warming, respectively. Increasing aerosol loading increases droplet number concentration, liquid water content, and fog optical thickness, which reduces droplet sedimentation rates and prolongs fog duration by up to 54 min. Overall, the microphysical influence of aerosols and droplets weakens under heavily polluted conditions. We also show that non-activated hydrated aerosols have a limited influence on total liquid water content and fog-layer mixing. However, they critically affect visibility and fog duration prediction, underscoring the importance of explicitly incorporating hydrated particles in fog forecasting and accurately representing aerosol composition. Additional sensitivity experiments reveal that the prescribed droplet spectral shape parameters significantly influence fog characteristics. Parameter settings that represent a broad droplet size spectrum overestimate the number of large droplets compared to observations, which increases mean droplet sedimentation rates and decreases mean liquid water content by up to 104 % and 78 %, respectively, compared to the settings that best represent the observed spectrum.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Horizon 2020</funding-source>
<award-id>821205</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>European Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>865799</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>European Commission</funding-source>
<award-id>101137680</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse</funding-source>
<award-id>2015.0162</award-id>
<award-id>2021.0169</award-id>
<award-id>2021.0298</award-id>
<award-id>2022.0104</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>Vetenskapsrådet</funding-source>
<award-id>2020–04158</award-id>
<award-id>2022-06725</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e241">Fog is a common phenomenon in the atmospheric boundary layer, posing significant risks to transportation safety and public health due to low visibility and the accumulation of pollutants. Prolonged fog events can also adversely affect crop growth and agricultural productivity, leading to reduced yields. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.1"/>. Radiation fog, one of the most frequent types of fog over land, forms primarily due to nocturnal surface radiative cooling, which leads to water vapor supersaturation and droplet formation. As the fog thickens, longwave radiative cooling at the fog top increases, promoting further condensation, while also inducing fog layer mixing through turbulence. The fog dissipation process is typically dominated by near-surface warming induced by shortwave radiation at sunrise, as well as turbulent entrainment of dry air at the fog top, reducing relative humidity and causing droplet evaporation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.2"/>. Overall, the evolution of radiation fog is governed by a complex interplay of thermodynamic, dynamic, and microphysical processes in the boundary layer. These processes, including radiation, turbulent mixing, aerosol–droplet interactions, and surface exchange, are highly coupled yet nonlinear, making fog simulation and forecasting challenging <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e253">High-resolution large-eddy simulation (LES) models are useful tools for studying boundary-layer processes, including radiation fog, since they explicitly resolve large-scale turbulent eddies and represent supersaturation dynamics better than typical weather forecast and climate models. When coupled with radiation and aerosol–cloud microphysics schemes, LES models have been shown to represent the aforementioned nonlinear interactions and the life cycle of radiation fog reasonably well. LES has been used extensively to investigate the sensitivity of fog to meteorological conditions (e.g., surface forcing and advection) as well as aerosol properties (e.g., number concentration) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.4"/>. Nevertheless, the representation of aerosol-droplet-fog interactions remains one of the major uncertainties in the simulations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e262">As a substrate for water vapor condensation, the hygroscopic growth and activation of aerosol particles are crucial for droplet formation. Previous modeling studies of aerosol-fog interactions have shown that higher aerosol number concentrations result in more activated droplets, increased liquid water content (LWC), and an optically thicker fog, which delays fog dissipation and thereby prolongs fog lifetime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.6"/>. Furthermore, non-activated hydrated aerosols, having grown to micron sizes, can also influence the optical properties of fog. These hydrated particles remain relatively small and have little effect on the longwave radiation budget and the optical thickening of fog <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.7"/>. However, due to their large number and high scattering and extinction efficiency, hydrated particles can substantially reduce visibility, even in the absence of activated droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.8"/>. The ability of dry aerosol particles to take up water can be expressed by the hygroscopicity parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), which depends on the chemical composition and mixing state of the aerosol <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.9"/>. Under highly polluted conditions, intense competition for water vapor due to the abundance of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) leads to low ambient supersaturation values, which limits the number of activated fog droplets. Thus, in polluted environments and in relation to the size distribution, the chemical composition and hygroscopicity of aerosols have been suggested to play a limited role in droplet activation and fog processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.10"/>. In contrast, under clean conditions and with higher supersaturation values, a larger fraction of hydrated particles is closer to the critical activation size, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value would play a larger role for the number of droplets activated.</p>
      <p id="d2e295">The shape of the droplet size distribution is also important for fog evolution, as it describes the distribution of LWC across droplets as well as the relationship between LWC and the droplet number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.11"/>. For a droplet spectrum that follows a gamma distribution and a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, larger shape parameters (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Sect. S1 in the Supplement) yield a narrower droplet spectrum, which typically suppresses autoconversion and sustains higher droplet number concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.12"/>. Moreover, a narrow size distribution reduces the effective droplet radius, a key factor determining cloud and fog optical properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.13"/>. Previous studies have demonstrated that variations in droplet size distribution parameterizations can influence key fog processes, including collision-coalescence efficiency, sedimentation rates, and the vertical extent of the fog layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx50" id="paren.14"/>. In previous numerical studies, shape parameters are often empirically prescribed based on the geographical region (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx68 bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.15"/>), an idealized practice that limits their general applicability. Notably, even within a single fog event, shape parameters can exhibit considerable variability, with local values showing no clear correlation with droplet number concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.16"/>. Moreover, the spectral dispersion determined by the shape parameters also shows a non-monotonic relationship with the volume-mean droplet size, depending instead on the relative strength of processes such as condensation/evaporation, activation/deactivation, and entrainment-mixing that reshape the droplet size distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.17"/>. Despite the substantial uncertainties, there have been only a few numerical studies that examined how the fog life cycle is affected by the representation of the droplet size distribution.</p>
      <p id="d2e357">In this study, we make use of LES and an extensive dataset of fog properties from the Fog and Aerosol Interaction Research Italy (FAIRARI) field campaign 2021/22 in the Po Valley <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.18"/> to examine aerosol-fog interactions from a microphysical perspective. The FAIRARI dataset includes meteorological conditions, aerosol physicochemical properties, and droplet measurements, providing a basis for model initialization and serving as a reference for model evaluation. The dataset encompasses detailed information on the size distribution of aerosols and cloud droplets, making it particularly suitable for investigating fog microphysical features. The Po Valley is in general an interesting area for aerosol-fog interaction studies – it is a region of frequent radiation fog formation, and several field campaigns focusing on fog have been carried out there in the past (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx48" id="altparen.19"/>). Furthermore, pollution levels today are much lower than in the 1980s (cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="altparen.20"/>), which may influence the life cycle and properties of the fog. Despite the lower pollution levels,  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.21"/> showed that hydrated aerosols still have a substantial impact on fog microphysical properties in the region. Against this background, and based on sensitivity experiments using the LES, we aim to address the following questions: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e374">What microphysical conditions are critical for capturing the general characteristics of the observed fog properties and life cycle?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e378">How sensitive are the fog properties to aerosol physics, including the total particle number concentration, particle mean size, and modal width?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e382">What is the role of aerosol chemistry for the fog properties under different pollution conditions, and what is the importance of hydrated aerosols?</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e386">How important is the model representation of the droplet size distribution, and how do variations in droplet microphysical parameters affect the fog behavior?</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Case description</title>
      <p id="d2e404">The FAIRARI campaign 2021/22 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.22"/> was conducted at the San Pietro Capofiume site (SPC, 44.65° N, 11.62° E) in Italy, which represents a background-polluted continental environment in the eastern Po Valley. The measured quantities and corresponding instruments used in this study are summarized in Sect. S2. We focus on three consecutive radiation fog events that took place during the winter of 2022, labeled as events 7, 8, and 9 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.23"/> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a). The series of events began at 18:49 LST (local standard time, UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) on 18 February, and the fog dissipated completely by 07:38 LST on 19 February, with a mean visibility (Vis) ranging between 66 and 151 m. The fog formation was triggered by longwave radiation loss and nocturnal surface cooling, leading to air saturation and aerosol activation. The near-surface layer was stably stratified, characterized by weak turbulence (mean turbulent kinetic energy, TKE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.011</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−2</sup>) and light winds (mean speed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6–0.9 m<sup>2</sup> s<sup>−2</sup>), predominantly from the southeast to the south (125–200°). The stable conditions favored the accumulation of a high aerosol load (mean number concentration for particles with diameters 13.3–792 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6065</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and fog droplets (mean number concentration for droplets with diameters 2–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and effective diameter, ED <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) close to the surface and a progressively increasing optical thickness of the fog layer during the evening and early night.</p>
      <p id="d2e582">The aerosol chemical composition in terms of mass was dominated by ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, and organics, with minor fractions of chloride and black carbon (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The bulk median hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the mixture, calculated using the Zdanovskii–Stokes–Robinson (ZSR) method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.24"/>, is approximately 0.45 during the fog events, indicating moderately hygroscopic aerosols. The relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> promoted hygroscopic aerosol growth and the formation of non-activated hydrated particles (hereafter referred to as hydrated particles), which substantially influenced the fog microphysics, particularly droplet number concentration and effective diameter (see further discussion in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.25"/>). As a result of their hygroscopic growth, hydrated particles also contribute to a bimodal droplet size distribution (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e614">Observed near-surface <bold>(a)</bold> droplet spectrum and <bold>(b)</bold> dry aerosol spectrum for fog events 7, 8, and 9 on 18–19 February 2022. The shaded gray areas indicate periods with fog (see also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.26"/>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e633">In this study, the observed wet critical activation size (i.e., the maximum size of non-activated hydrated particles) was determined using two approaches (see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.27"/> for details). The first approach followed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.28"/>, identifying the ambient activation diameter as the first local minimum from the right side of droplet size distribution; particles larger than this threshold were classified as activated droplets. The second approach employed a closure analysis, comparing the dry aerosol spectrum with the droplet spectrum. Assuming activation starting from the largest aerosols, the dry distribution was integrated until it matched the activated droplet number concentration, the resulting dry particle size was taken as the dry critical activation diameter, and the corresponding wet activation diameter was then calculated using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory. For fog events 7–9, the wet activation diameters calculated using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory resulted in a mean value of 9.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.29"/>, based on which the observed wet particles were categorized into two groups: particles ranging from the typical lower measurement limit of fog monitors (2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) up to approximately 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m were counted as hydrated particles, while those larger than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m were considered activated droplets. This classification generally agrees with the bimodal size distribution shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a.</p>
      <p id="d2e694">During the three fog events, two brief interruptions were observed (at 00:14–01:14 and 04:02–04:14 LST), corresponding to periods that did not meet the fog criteria of Vis <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km and RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.30"/>. The first interruption was additionally characterized by a temporary disappearance of large droplets and a sharp decrease in LWC, leaving only residual haze particles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a). We suggest that these interruptions were caused by short-term near-surface warming that led to droplet evaporation, although the precise local meteorological drivers remain unclear (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Model description</title>
      <p id="d2e726">The simulations were carried out using the MISU–MIT Cloud and Aerosol model (MIMICA; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="altparen.31"/>), a three-dimensional LES code that solves the equations describing a non-hydrostatic, incompressible atmospheric system. The model employs a 1.5-order subgrid-scale turbulence closure scheme and computes surface fluxes using Monin–Obukhov similarity theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63" id="paren.32"/>, enabling the representation of the exchange of momentum, heat, and moisture between the surface and atmosphere under specified surface forcing. Warm cloud microphysics is represented using a two-moment bulk scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx59" id="paren.33"/>, which predicts the mass mixing ratios and number concentrations of hydrometeors. The mass distributions of cloud droplets and raindrops are described by gamma functions. Raindrop terminal velocities follow a power-law relationship <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.34"/>, while cloud droplet terminal velocity is computed based on a generalized gamma distribution within the Stokes regime and is incorporated into the prognostic equations for droplet number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and liquid mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Sect. S1). Supersaturation is explicitly resolved using the pseudo-analytical approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.35"/>, with its effects on condensation and evaporation integrated at each time step.</p>
      <p id="d2e767">MIMICA includes an interactive aerosol scheme, where aerosols are described using a two-moment module with all aerosol modes following lognormal size distributions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.36"/>. The aerosol number size distribution with respect to particle radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M37" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is total aerosol number concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is geometric mean radius and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is geometric standard deviation for mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e947">In the present study, the aerosol size distribution is represented by one mode, covering the measured size range of 13.3–792 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation into droplets are calculated based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory (see Sect. S3).  Consistent with the lower measurement threshold common in fog monitors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.37"/>, particles with wet diameters larger than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m are typically classified as fog droplets. To further investigate the role of fog droplets with different sizes in fog processes, and similar to the classification of observed wet particles, a detailed classification is applied here to the simulated wet particles: particles that have grown a wet diameter above 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m but do not reach the activation size are categorized as hydrated aerosols, whereas those exceeding the activation size (determined by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory) are counted as activated droplets. Accordingly, the number concentration of total droplets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sum of hydrated aerosols <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,hyd</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and activated droplets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,act</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,hyd</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,act</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>act</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>act</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Radiative transfer is computed using a four-stream scheme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.38"/>, which includes six bands for solar radiation and twelve bands for the infrared part. This scheme accounts for the radiative effects of cloud droplets and raindrops, allowing a dynamic coupling between radiation and cloud microphysical processes. Note that the aerosol particles do not directly affect the radiative transfer, only indirectly by altering the fog microphysical properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e1125">Based on the above schemes, the diagnosed microphysical quantities of total droplets are used to characterize the fog life cycle and optical properties. Fog periods are defined by a Vis <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 km and RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.39"/>, where the parameterized visibility Vis is calculated as a function negatively correlated with LWC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.40"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Vis</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.002</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>LWC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6473</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.002</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6473</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the air density and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is liquid mixing ratio. This parameterization is applicable for LWC in the range of 0.005–0.5 g m<sup>−3</sup> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within 1–400 cm<sup>−3</sup>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1278">The liquid water path LWP and optical thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the fog layer are calculated following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.41"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.42"/> as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M61" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>LWP</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>fog</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>base</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>fog</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>top</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mtext>LWC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>fog</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>base</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>fog</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>top</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>LWP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the fog top and base heights are determined from grid cells meeting the criteria: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,act</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<sup>−3</sup> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<sup>−1</sup> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.43"/>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the density of liquid water, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the air density, and the droplet effective radius is calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eff</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Simulation setup</title>
      <p id="d2e1561">Our reference simulation was initialized at 18:00 LST on 18 February 2022 and continued until 14:00 LST the following day, with a temporal resolution of approximately 1.0 s. Simulation tests showed that this time step optimally balanced numerical accuracy in resolving the supersaturation evolution and computational efficiency. A coarser time step was found to overestimate local supersaturation and droplet activation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="paren.44"/>. The simulation domain was 0.16 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.16 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 km, with a grid spacing of 5 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5 m <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 m.</p>
      <p id="d2e1595">The initial vertical profiles of temperature and humidity were configured using a combination of radiosonde observations at SPC and ECMWF Reanalysis (ERA5, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.45"/>). The radio sounding and reanalysis both indicated warm-air advection above the fog layer around 22:00 LST. To reproduce this feature, we applied nudging based on the ERA5 profiles between 21:30 and 22:30 LST, primarily for warm advection above 120 m (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The initial horizontal wind field was set to zero, in agreement with observations and reanalysis that showed weak near-surface winds and wind shear. Since the series of fog events was mainly driven by radiative cooling with negligible vertical motion, the initial updraft was also set to zero. For the surface forcing, the surface skin temperature (SST) was prescribed using 3.5-m temperature observations starting from 18:00 LST (Fig. S2). Due to the absence of soil moisture observations, the baseline surface skin moisture (SSM) was also interpolated based on the 3.5-m data, which were saturated during nighttime. At sunrise, the 3.5-m humidity measurements remained saturated and were thus not representative of the response of soil moisture to shortwave heating. To account for surface heating and subsequent evaporation, we estimated the surface relative humidity RH (in %) after sunrise using the revised Tetens formula <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.46"/>:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M74" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.625</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.625</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the dew point temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was approximated by the nocturnal minimum temperature. The influence of surface forcing is further discussed in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/> and S6, where sensitivity tests are labeled as SFC_SST and SFC_SSM.</p>
      <p id="d2e1707">The observed aerosol size distribution showed a relatively large variability during the series of fog events (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b), with total number concentrations ranging between 4067 and 9927 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Given the very low aerosol activation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, cf. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="altparen.47"/>), aerosol scavenging and regeneration processes were neglected, and the dry aerosol population was kept close to the fitted observational means during the simulations. In the lognormal distribution fitting, priority was placed on ensuring that the particle size distribution and spectral mean diameter of the accumulation mode matched the observed spectrum, as large particles in these size ranges dominated activation, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.48"/>. Specifically, the total aerosol concentration was set to 5000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the geometric mean radius to 48.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the dimensionless geometric standard deviation to 1.9. The chemical composition of the aerosol mixture was prescribed as constant, based on the observational mean, represented by a molar weight of 49.35 g mol<sup>−1</sup>, a density of 1618.62 kg m<sup>−3</sup>, and an average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.45, with its individual chemical components shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1798">As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>, the prescribed shape of the droplet size distribution in MIMICA follows a gamma distribution. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a shows the observed fog droplet size distribution, together with different idealized gamma distributions using a range of shape parameters. As discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.49"/>, the observations show a clear bimodal droplet size distribution, with one peak around 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, associated with non-activated hydrated particles, and a second peak around 10–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, associated with activated fog droplets. For the reference simulation, we used a distribution with shape parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which reasonably captures the observed mean activated droplet spectrum (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>). The peak associated with the hydrated aerosols is predicted in MIMICA by the aerosol module using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Köhler theory (see Sect. S3).</p>
      <p id="d2e1861">Additionally, given the small average droplet size and the correspondingly low collision efficiency and following the recommendation from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.50"/>, the collision-coalescence process was turned off in MIMICA in the reference simulation (tests with collision-coalescence enabled are presented in Sect. S5). The droplet autoconversion term was also excluded due to the absence of precipitation in the observations. Notably, by deactivating these two processes, the droplet size distribution in the model can be maintained largely consistent with that implied by the prescribed shape parameters; otherwise, potential adjustments to the droplet size distribution through collision–coalescence and autoconversion could introduce inconsistencies with the droplet spectrum corresponding to sedimentation rates calculated based on the prescribed shape parameters.</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1869">Initial aerosol number size distribution and chemical composition mass fractions used in the reference simulation (Sim), fitted from the observed mean aerosol spectrum over the fog events (Obs), with the shaded area indicating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SD.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>


</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Sensitivity experiments</title>
      <p id="d2e1898">To address the research questions outlined in the introduction and, specifically, to quantify the responses of fog properties to variations in aerosol regimes and droplet microphysical representations, we conducted sensitivity experiments. To systematically evaluate the effects of individual parameters while minimizing parameter interactions, we implemented the one-at-a-time (OAT) sensitivity for the tests. An overview of the experimental design is given in Table. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>2.4.1</label><title>Aerosol physics</title>
      <p id="d2e1910">The aerosol size distribution critically determines both the number of CCN and their activation efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.51"/>. Here, we focus our analysis on changes in the total aerosol number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Similar to non-surface clouds, for a constant LWC, an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally produces a higher concentration of smaller droplets, which enhances the cloud's optical thickness and impacts the radiative properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.52"/>. Furthermore, smaller droplet sizes also suppress autoconversion and the formation of precipitation, which reduces sedimentation rates and can lead to an extended residence time of liquid water <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx70" id="paren.53"/>, i.e. a longer fog duration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.54"/>. For this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was varied from 2000 to 24 000 cm<sup>−3</sup> with 2000 cm<sup>−3</sup> intervals (labeled as AERO_NA*). The chosen range of aerosol concentrations was based on observations from the Po Valley during the 1980s–1990s as well as the recent FAIRARI campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.55"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1986">In the sub-micron size range, nucleation mode and Aitken mode particles typically originate from local emissions, whereas accumulation mode aerosols often undergo coagulation and long-range transport, and generally exhibit higher activation efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.56"/>. For a log-normal aerosol size distribution, variations in modal composition are reflected in predefined geometric mean radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are usually associated with locally sourced, single-origin particles, whereas larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate a greater contribution from accumulation mode particles that have aged, are internally mixed, and exhibit multi-source characteristics.</p>
      <p id="d2e2047">To investigate the response of fog to changes in the aerosol spectral parameters, sensitivity experiments were conducted by perturbing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % within the observed range of variation for the fog events (denoted as AERO_SIG* and AERO_RG*, respectively). Positive perturbations shift the size distribution toward the accumulation mode, while negative perturbations enhance the relative contribution of nucleation and Aitken mode particles. The perturbed size distributions were compared with the observed spectrum, showing that the mean relative deviation (MRD, defined as the average of the relative errors across sizes normalized by the observational standard deviation) does not exceed 1.5 SD for negative perturbations while remaining below 0.7 SD for positive perturbations. The responses of fog properties to these perturbations are presented in Sect. S7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>2.4.2</label><title>Aerosol chemistry</title>
      <p id="d2e2096">Building upon the discussion in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/> regarding the role of aerosol chemical composition under different pollution conditions, we developed a series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbation experiments (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, within the range observed during fog events 7–9) across varying aerosol loading to further quantify the impact. For typical clean conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cm<sup>−3</sup>), which are rarely observed in the Po Valley, the background aerosol composition was initialized using observations from the Hyytiälä site <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.57"/>, with a baseline bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.27, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> set to 200, 600, 1000, and 2000 cm<sup>−3</sup>. For the polluted scenarios, the baseline aerosol composition and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.45) were the same as in the reference simulation, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set to 6000, 12 000, 18 000 and 24 000 cm<sup>−3</sup>. The simulations under clean and polluted conditions are labeled as AERO_NA*KC* and AERO_NA*KP*, respectively. Note that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were kept the same in all simulations here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>2.4.3</label><title>Droplet microphysics</title>
      <p id="d2e2236">To investigate the sensitivity of fog development to variations in the prescribed droplet size distribution, the observed mean droplet spectrum was fitted with a general gamma distribution. Based on the fitting results, as well as typical distributions reported in previous studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.58"/>), a series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> shape parameter combinations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, labeled as DROP_A*N*, where A stands for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) were selected and systematically evaluated. The results indicate that medium width spectrum combinations [2,3] and [2,4], as well as [3,1], which was used in the reference simulation, provide a good fit for the activated droplet range (diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b). The potential impact of wider spectrum combinations, which may be less physically realistic but have been adopted in previous studies (e.g., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="altparen.59"/>), was also examined.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2305"><bold>(a)</bold> Comparison of observed mean droplet number size distribution (solid line) and model-fitted generalized gamma distributions (dashed lines) for different combinations of shape parameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The shaded area represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SD. <bold>(b)</bold> Goodness-of-fit in log-space for the corresponding parameter combinations in the activated particle range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m), with blue bars representing the root mean square error (RMSE) and red lines representing the coefficient of determination (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2376">Summary of sensitivity experiments. Key parameters include SST (surface skin temperature) and SSM (surface skin moisture) for surface forcing; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (aerosol number concentration), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (geometric mean radius) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (geometric standard deviation) for aerosol log-normal distribution; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (shape parameters) for droplet gamma distribution.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Experiment category</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Simulation label</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SSM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (cm<sup>−3</sup>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reference simulation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">REF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ref</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ref</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">[3,1]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface forcing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SFC_SST*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">*<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SFC_SSM*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">*VAR, 0.95,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.90, 0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol physics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AERO_NA*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">*2000–24 000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AERO_RG*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">*<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AERO_SIG*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">*<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol chemistry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(Clean conditions)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AERO_NA*KC*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">*200, 600,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1000, 2000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aerosol chemistry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(Polluted conditions)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AERO_NA*KP*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">*6000, 12 000,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18 000, 24 000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Droplet microphysics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DROP_A*N*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">*[1,1],[1,2],</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">[1,3],[2,1],</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">[1,8],[1,9],</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">[2,2],[2,3],</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">[2,4],[3,2],</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">[3,3]</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Reference simulation</title>
      <p id="d2e3317">The reference simulation (REF, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>) serves as a baseline for our study and is compared to observational data (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>) to evaluate the model performance. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> shows the time height evolution of in-fog properties. Nocturnal longwave radiative cooling at the surface results in supersaturated air, droplet activation, and fog formation around 19:30 LST. The fog top lifting is mainly attributed to sustained radiative emission by the droplets, with additional contributions from air radiative loss and turbulent diffusion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.60"/>. For the present case, the presence of advected warm air above the fog limits the vertical development. Neglecting the advection, and thus the entrainment of warm, dry air at the fog top, results in a considerably thicker fog layer and an extended fog lifetime compared to the REF simulation (see Sect. S5). As the fog develops and becomes optically thick, the region of strong radiative cooling shifts gradually from the surface to the fog top, where supersaturation and droplet concentrations reach peak levels. During the mature stage (e.g., 00:00–02:00 LST), the negative buoyancy generated by fog-top cooling, together with a weak surface warming (Fig. S2), renders the fog layer thermodynamically unstable and triggers convection. This enhances the mixing within the fog layer and suppresses droplet sedimentation, resulting in relatively high droplet number concentrations and liquid water content. After sunrise, near-surface warming induces droplet evaporation, leading to a decoupling of the fog layer from the surface. In addition, droplet sedimentation is found to play an important role in fog dissipation. If the sedimentation scheme is disabled (see Sect. S5), fog liquid water content, droplet number and geometrical thickness are significantly overestimated, and the dissipation is also delayed compared to observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e3331">The near-surface microphysics and visibility time series are evaluated against the observations in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>. MIMICA simulates the dissipation phase well, but the onset occurs approximately 41 min later than observed. This delay is likely related to uncertainties in the prescribed surface forcing, as the REF simulation relies on 3.5-m air temperature due to the absence of in-situ ground surface temperature measurements. In stable boundary layers, the ground surface is typically colder than the near-surface air and cools at a faster rate, as also reported in early Po Valley field campaigns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.61"/>. Sensitivity experiments with surface temperature perturbations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K confirm that lowering the surface temperature results in earlier fog onset (see Fig. S4a), consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.62"/>, who noted that locally cooler or moister surfaces tend to favor fog formation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3362">The simulated near-surface supersaturation (0.0034 %–0.0294 %, mean 0.0129 %) is in reasonable agreement with observational supersaturation constraints (0.0117 %–0.0238 %, mean 0.0165 %; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="altparen.63"/>), indicating that the REF simulation realistically captures the local microphysical conditions governing droplet activation. The model also reproduces the observed mean droplet size reasonably well but overestimates the number of activated droplets and the liquid water content (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c, a, and b, respectively), which is a common issue when using bulk microphysics schemes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.64"/>. Another potential reason for the overestimate by MIMICA is that the model does not include a detailed parametrization of atmosphere–surface interactions. For example, processes such as droplet deposition at the surface and interception by vegetation are not represented <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.65"/>. This overestimation is particularly pronounced for large droplets. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>, the simulated number concentration of droplets larger than 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is substantially higher than observed, except for event 8. These large droplets dominate the total fog water and are most likely the primary reason for the positive modeled bias in liquid water mixing ratio (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). However, the surface flux of water vapor also plays a crucial role in regulating the liquid water content. A series of sensitivity experiments was conducted, where the surface relative humidity was set to 85 %, 90 %, and 95 % (SSM_085, SSM_090, and SSM_095) and the nocturnal surface warming and evaporation processes based on Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>) were refined (labeled as SSM_VAR). These adjustments effectively reduce droplet numbers and liquid water relative to REF, and in some cases (e.g., SSM_090 and SSM_085), the model has the potential to capture water loss and non-fog periods between fog events (see Sect. S6).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3396">Time–height cross-sections of horizontally averaged fog properties in the reference simulation: <bold>(a)</bold> droplet number concentration, <bold>(b)</bold> liquid water mixing ratio, <bold>(c)</bold> droplet sedimentation velocity, <bold>(d)</bold> net radiative temperature rate, <bold>(e)</bold> supersaturation and <bold>(f)</bold> turbulent kinetic energy. The fog top and base are shown as dashed and dash-dotted gray lines.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3426">Time series of near-surface <bold>(a)</bold> droplet number concentration, <bold>(b)</bold> liquid water mixing ratio, <bold>(c)</bold> droplet mean diameter and <bold>(d)</bold> measured and parameterized (para.)  visibility from observations (obs) and simulations (sim) for the whole fog event, where “act” refers to activated droplets only and “act+hyd” includes both activated droplets and hydrated aerosols. The shaded gray areas indicate fog periods identified from the observation. Note that this figure differs slightly from Fig. 11 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="text.66"/> due to updated meteorological conditions and fog period criteria in the current study.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3450">In contrast to the overestimation of activated droplets, MIMICA reproduces fewer hydrated particles than observed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>), which is most likely because the hygroscopic growth factor in the model is calculated using a bulk-averaged method, that is, all dry particles take up water vapor with the same factor (see Sect. S3). In reality, due to the Kelvin effect, small particles have a high surface curvature, which increases their equilibrium vapor pressure and inhibits water uptake, whereas larger particles have lower curvature and can absorb water more easily. In other words, the hygroscopic growth factor should increase with particle size, meaning that larger particles should grow more than smaller ones (see the comparison between observed and simulated wet aerosols in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). Note that when comparing the total number of droplets (i.e., hydrated particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> activated droplets), the model agrees well with observations, indicating that the high bias in activated droplets is partially compensated by the low bias of hydrated particles. Due to their small size, simulated hydrated particles do not contribute substantially to the total fog water content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Consequently, and in line with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.67"/>, our simulations show that the development of a well-mixed fog layer is primarily driven by the activated droplets; deactivating the hygroscopic growth scheme in MIMICA has a negligible effect on fog thickness <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and liquid water path LWP (see Sect. S5).</p>
      <p id="d2e3485">The parameterized visibility from the simulation is generally higher than the observed one (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d). This discrepancy can be partly attributed to the fact that extinction, as a function of wavelength and droplet size distribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="altparen.68"/>), is not explicitly resolved in MIMICA. Another reason is that in the observations the visibility sensor accounts also for extinction from very fine particles, whereas in the parameterization from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.69"/>, only droplets larger than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m are included. Additionally, neglecting the hydrated particles would result in a further overprediction of visibility (17.80 %–79.03 %, mean 39.64 %) and biases in fog period estimation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>d).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3508">Size distributions of observed (Obs) and simulated (Sim) aerosols and fog droplets, averaged over fog events 7, 8, and 9. Upper panel: number concentrations, lower panel: LWC. “Dry” and “wet” refer to aerosols before and after hygroscopic growth, respectively. Shaded areas indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SD. Note that the LWC of simulated hydrated droplets (Sim_drop (hyd)) is visible only within a very narrow diameter range in the lower left corner of the LWC panel.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Sensitivity to aerosol physics</title>
      <p id="d2e3535">As described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS1"/>, to assess the impact of aerosol number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on fog properties, we conducted the AERO_NA sensitivity experiments, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varying from 2000 to 24 000 cm<sup>−3</sup> in 2000 cm<sup>−3</sup> increments. With higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the number of both activated and hydrated particles increases, resulting in a higher liquid water content and a decrease in visibility (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c, d, h). At the same time, the longwave radiative cooling is enhanced, which increases negative buoyancy and elevates TKE, thereby promoting stronger fog layer mixing during the mature stage. Under conditions of nearly constant water vapor available for condensation, stronger competition for vapor reduces the mean droplet radius (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e), which is consistent with the Twomey effect in clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.70"/>, and was also observed during the field campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.71"/>. In addition, enhanced competition suppresses ambient supersaturation, resulting in a smaller fraction of particles that can be activated (i.e., the activation fraction in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>a). The droplet conversion fraction, i.e., the ratio of the total droplet number to the aerosol number, also decreases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; nevertheless, the relative contribution of hydrated particles to the total droplet population increases and becomes dominant at around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>b). In other words, variations in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are largely attributable to changes in the number of hydrated particles at high aerosol concentrations. Considering the underestimate of the hygroscopic growth factor noted in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>, their actual contribution should be higher, and the threshold <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where they start to dominate the total droplet number concentration is likely lower.</p>
      <p id="d2e3678">For cases with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fog lifetime is generally prolonged with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, manifested as slightly earlier formation and a more pronounced, delayed dissipation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a, b). The earlier onset is due to the reduction in visibility caused by the numerous hydrated particles under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions during the initial stage of the fog, when droplet activation has not yet become dominant. The delayed dissipation can, in our simulations, be attributed to the reduced sedimentation rates that extend the residence time of fog droplets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>g), consistent with the cloud lifetime effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.72"/>. The amount of shortwave radiation that reaches the surface is also reduced, which, in reality, should dampen surface warming and slow down droplet evaporation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.73"/>. However, in our simulations, the surface forcing was kept identical across all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases. Consequently, this type of suppression of near-surface droplet evaporation under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not represented. The case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> appears to stand out from the other cases, with fog dissipating about 7 minutes earlier than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However,  this difference is not significant. The behavior can be attributed to a slightly faster decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the dissipation phase, which accelerates the increase in visibility above the 1 km threshold that is used to identify fog dissipation. The exact timing for when the visibility threshold is passed can be affected by small random perturbations that are used to initialize the model (e.g., in potential temperature). To examine the influence of the random perturbations, we performed duplicate simulations for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with different random perturbations. These two simulations did indeed show slightly different times for fog dissipation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3934">For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fog duration becomes almost insensitive to further increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The reason is that the aerosol activation transitions from an aerosol-limited to a supersaturation-limited regime at high aerosol concentrations. For a constant amount of condensable water vapor, the ambient supersaturation will decline and stabilize as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>f), meaning that adding more aerosols will not lead to increased activation. This explains the pronounced decline in the relative sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>c). Furthermore, since the change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is small, the change in mean droplet size and sedimentation velocity (which is proportional to the square of the droplet size, see Sect. S1) also becomes small (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>g). Consequently, the visibility (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>h) becomes insensitive to increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the response of fog lifetime to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> becomes nonlinear.</p>
      <p id="d2e4053">This result shows that differences in sedimentation rates and the resulting impact on visibility become negligible under extremely high pollution conditions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>g, h). Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>c also shows that the relative sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> declines sharply at high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, primarily due to the availability of water vapor and supersaturation.</p>
      <p id="d2e4094">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> shows the fog height and optical properties for the AERO_NA experiments. In contrast to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="text.74"/>, where halving or doubling the CCN concentration was found to alter fog height by around 35 %, our results show a small influence of changing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is doubled, the fog-top height increases on average by no more than 4 %. Even across all AERO_NA cases, the average fog top increase does not exceed 11 %. This suggests that the geometric thickness of the fog layer exhibits a relatively weak sensitivity to variations in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, when only longwave emission by droplets and subsequent buoyancy-driven turbulent mixing are considered (and no other aerosol-driven radiative effects). By comparison, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exerts a more pronounced effect on the LWP and fog optical thickness, where the elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and LWC with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are a result of not only more activation but also reduced sedimentation that prolongs the droplet residence time.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4171">Statistical near-surface fog properties in AERO_NA experiments: <bold>(a)</bold> fog onset time, <bold>(b)</bold> fog dissipation time, <bold>(c)</bold> total droplet number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> liquid water mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> mean droplet diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(f)</bold> supersaturation “Ss”, <bold>(g)</bold> droplet sedimentation velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">drop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(h)</bold> visibility Vis. Where both activated and hydrated particles are counted in the fog droplet category and the visibility parameterization, see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. The boxes represent the 25–75th percentiles, whiskers the 5–95th percentiles, the solid line the median, and the black triangle the mean. Shaded areas illustrate the distribution of values.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4254"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related statistical results in the AERO_NA experiments: <bold>(a)</bold> droplet activation and conversion fraction, where the activation fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,act</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, and the conversion fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,act</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>c,hyd</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, <bold>(b)</bold> contribution of activated and hydrated particles to total droplet population, and <bold>(c)</bold> relative sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is quantified as the percentage change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the lower-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scenario between two consecutive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cases differing by 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over their overlapping fog period. The light blue boxes represent activated particles, and dark blue ones include hydrated particles.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4413">Vertical fog properties in AERO_NA experiments: <bold>(a)</bold> fog layer height (solid lines: fog top, dashed lines: fog base), <bold>(b)</bold> optical thickness and <bold>(c)</bold> liquid water path.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Sensitivity to aerosol chemistry</title>
      <p id="d2e4439">The response of fog to aerosol chemistry was examined through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbation experiments under different pollution scenarios (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS4.SSS2"/>). With a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the number concentration of activated droplets (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a and c) increases, which in turn leads to a decrease in the visibility (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>b and d) and an increase in the LWP and optical thickness (not shown) compared to the baseline case. This can be explained by the decrease in the dry activation diameter. However, the sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varies under different pollution scenarios. Overall, the number of activated droplets is more sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbations under clean conditions, i.e. with lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a). The case with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an exception. In this case, only short periods meet the fog criterion (visibility <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) and most data points with large relative changes in microphysical parameters are filtered out, resulting in a weaker statistical response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbations. Except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the relative changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is increased by 10 % and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced by 10 %, which is generally higher than the corresponding changes for polluted conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, respectively, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a). The visibility calculated using only activated droplets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) shows a similar result (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>b). However, when hydrated particles are considered, the sensitivity of the total number concentration of droplets to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbations exhibits a different pattern, with greater sensitivity under polluted conditions. For a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbation, the relative change in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under clean conditions (baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is much lower than that in polluted conditions (baseline <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>c), with a corresponding decrease in visibility of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.7 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.6 % (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>d). Under clean conditions, these values are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.4 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.7 %, respectively.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4857">Relative change of fog properties to aerosol hygroscopicity parameter perturbations (blue: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">−</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, red: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) under different aerosol loading conditions (white box: clean, gray box: polluted), compared with corresponding base <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cases, where <bold>(a)</bold> the number of activated droplets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> visibility parameterized by activated droplets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">act</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> the number of total droplets <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (activated + hydrated), and <bold>(d)</bold> visibility parameterized by total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Boxes represent the 25–75th percentiles, whiskers the 5–95th percentiles, solid lines the median, and triangles labeled with numbers indicate the mean.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4964">These results partly support previous studies suggesting that the effect of changes in the chemical composition on the activated number of fog droplets is relatively small compared to the effect of changes in the aerosol size distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.75"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, particularly under high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. However, this does not imply that uncertainties in chemical composition can be neglected when hydrated particles are considered; an accurate representation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> remains crucial, especially for estimating visibility and fog duration. It is also worthwhile to point out that particle composition and size distribution are not decoupled in reality, as both are governed by the sources and atmospheric processing of the emitted particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e4991">The response in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the corresponding visibility, to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> changes is nonlinear, with a much higher sensitivity for positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbations than for negative ones. This asymmetry arises not only from the nonlinear dependence of aerosol hygroscopic growth and activation on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbations but also from the characteristics of the aerosol size distribution. Taking <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> = 12 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an example, a 10 % increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the baseline reduces the critical activation diameter, resulting in an approximate 4.0 % average increase in activated droplets. At the same time, the hygroscopic growth factor increases by 4.9 %, shifting the wet aerosol spectrum toward larger sizes. Because particles in the accumulation mode are more highly concentrated at smaller sizes, as seen from the lognormal distribution, a large number of fine particles originally just below the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m threshold can exceed it under enhanced hygroscopic growth and are counted into the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This results in a substantial increase in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and, consequently, a sharp decrease in visibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), given the strong negative correlation between visibility and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In contrast, a 10 % decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to an average reduction in the activated droplets of about 5.3 % and lowers the hygroscopic growth factor by 5.1 %. Given the rapid decline of aerosol number concentration with increasing particle size in the accumulation mode, the wet size distribution resulting from hygroscopic growth scaled by the bulk growth factor retains the same decreasing trend. As the spectrum shifts toward smaller wet sizes with a lower growth factor, only a few particles above the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m threshold fall below it and are excluded from the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a result, the reduction in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is relatively limited (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), and so is the corresponding increase in visibility (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %).</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e5181">Statistical near-surface fog properties in DROP_AN experiments: <bold>(a)</bold> fog onset time, <bold>(b)</bold> fog dissipation time, <bold>(c)</bold> droplet number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> liquid water mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(e)</bold> mean droplet diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(f)</bold> droplet terminal velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">drop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(g)</bold> visibility Vis. Where both activated and hydrated particles are counted in the droplet category. The boxes represent the 25–75th percentiles, whiskers the 5–95th percentiles, the solid line the median, and the black triangle the mean. Shaded areas illustrate the distribution of values. Below the dashed line are narrow-droplet-spectrum cases.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e5258"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related statistical results in DROP_AN experiments: <bold>(a)</bold> droplet activation and conversion fraction, <bold>(b)</bold> contribution of activated and hydrated particles in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where light blue boxes represent activated particles, and dark blue ones represent hydrated particles.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F13" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d2e5296">Vertical fog properties in DROP_AN experiments: <bold>(a)</bold> fog layer height (solid lines: fog top, dashed lines: fog base), <bold>(b)</bold> optical thickness, and <bold>(c)</bold> liquid water path.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9721/2026/acp-26-9721-2026-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Sensitivity to droplet microphysics</title>
      <p id="d2e5322">As mentioned in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S1"/> and shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>, the generalized gamma distribution exhibits clear limitations in representing the wide spectrum of fog droplet sizes. For simulations with combinations of small shape parameters, such as [1,1], [1,2], [1,3], and [2,1] (hereafter referred to as wide-spectrum cases), the representation of small droplets is reasonable, but the number concentration of large droplets (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) is overestimated, which increases the bulk mean droplet size and consequently enhances the overall sedimentation rate (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>f). In particular, the average sedimentation velocity in cases DROP_A1N2 and DROP_A1N1 is about 1.6 and 2.0 times higher, respectively, than in the narrow-spectrum cases. Additionally, in these wide-spectrum simulations, liquid water is distributed more evenly across droplet sizes, making the fog liquid water more sensitive to sedimentation losses. Together, these two factors lead to a significant reduction in total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the post-sedimentation droplet population becomes increasingly dominated by hydrated particles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>b). Consequently, the mean droplet size is reduced, and near-surface visibility increases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>e and g). Fog onset is slightly delayed in the wide-spectrum cases relative to the narrow-spectrum cases, whereas no notable differences are observed among the narrow-spectrum simulations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a). The model does not show a clear correlation between fog dissipation and the prescribed droplet size distribution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b). Also, when increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under the same wide-spectrum parameter setting, no delay in the fog dissipation similar to that shown in the AERO_NA experiments (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b) is observed, suggesting that under enhanced sedimentation regimes, the fog lifetime is less sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (not shown). Furthermore, in the sensitivity experiments with droplet collision–coalescence enabled, no significant differences are observed across the wide-spectrum cases (not shown). This is likely because the fog droplet sizes are generally relatively small, resulting in very low collision–coalescence efficiency and rendering this process negligible for the overall fog properties.</p>
      <p id="d2e5405">In terms of vertical structure, for wide-spectrum cases, enhanced sedimentation inhibits fog-top lifting and reduces geometric and optical thickness, and the temporal variability in LWP and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is smoothed out (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>). In the DROP_A1N1 case, the maximum fog-top height is about 60 m with a mean LWP of 1.57 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>g m</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas in the narrow-spectrum reference case DROP_A3N1, the maximum fog-top height reaches about 100 m with a mean LWP of 11.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>g m</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5445">A comparison among the narrow-spectrum simulations shows that different parameter combinations lead to variations in the fog optical thickness, where a narrower spectrum produces thicker fog layers and some local fluctuations in the near-surface temporal evolution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>). Nevertheless, the overall near-surface microphysical statistics – such as droplet number concentration, liquid water content, and the relative fraction of hydrated and activated droplets – show only small differences (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>). This indicates that merely adjusting the generalized gamma distribution parameters is insufficient to address the  positive bias in activated droplet number concentration and the liquid water content of large droplets.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5463">Using one-at-a-time sensitivity experiments with prescribed surface forcing and excluding aerosol-radiation interactions, this study isolates and examines cloud microphysical impacts of aerosols and fog droplets on an observed case of wintertime radiation fog in the Po Valley. The results show that an increase in aerosol number concentration generally increases the number of fog droplets, thereby increasing the fog liquid water content, enhancing optical thickness, and reducing visibility. Concurrently, a decrease in the average droplet size weakens sedimentation rates, extending the residence time of droplets and prolonging fog duration by up to 54 min. However, these responses are nonlinear; under high-pollution conditions (i.e., in a supersaturation-limited regime), and when only the effects of aerosols as CCN are considered (i.e. no aerosol-radiation interactions), the sensitivity of fog properties and duration to aerosol number is significantly reduced. Moreover, with higher aerosol loading, the droplet activation fraction decreases, and at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fog is dominated by hydrated aerosols (haze) rather than activated aerosols (fog droplets). Overall, hydrated aerosols contribute about 40 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to 63 % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the total droplet number.</p>
      <p id="d2e5554">The chemical composition of the aerosol affects the activation of droplets and the hygroscopic growth of the aerosol mainly through the hygroscopicity parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared with the aerosol size distribution, the influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on droplet activation is relatively weak and is, in agreement with previous studies, more pronounced under clean conditions than under polluted conditions. Nevertheless, unlike most previous fog modelling studies that focused primarily on activated droplets, the explicit representation of aerosol hygroscopic growth in our model reveals that when hydrated particles are considered, variations in aerosol chemical composition and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> substantially influence the total droplet number concentration (i.e., the sum of haze and fog droplets) and visibility. This underscores the importance of accurately representing aerosol chemical composition and accounting for hydrated aerosol particles in visibility prediction and fog forecasting, particularly in polluted environments.</p>
      <p id="d2e5578">For the simulated range of aerosol number concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–24 000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the fog droplet budget is primarily governed by sedimentation, condensation/evaporation, and turbulent diffusion, whereas autoconversion and collision–coalescence processes play a minor role. With a careful selection of shape parameters, the generalized gamma distribution represents the observed mean size spectrum of activated droplets reasonably. However, employing different parameter combinations found in the literature, where some produce excessively broad size spectra compared to the observations for the specific case, leads in some cases to substantial underestimation of the fog droplet number, liquid water content, as well as geometric and optical thickness. Furthermore, the observed droplet spectrum, which includes hydrated particles, often exhibits multimodal structures. Given the highlighted importance of hydrated particles, future parameterization schemes could explicitly distinguish between hydrated particles and activated fog droplet populations and allow for multimodal size distributions to better capture key microphysical processes.</p>
      <p id="d2e5610">Overall, this study offers a preliminary framework for understanding the microphysical impacts of aerosols on haze, fog droplets and fog evolution. However, several limitations in the physical representation of various processes and parameters should be noted. First, the bulk microphysics scheme based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–Köhler theory does not fully resolve the size-dependent hygroscopic growth associated with Kelvin effect and thereby tends to underestimate the growth factor and the number of hydrated particles. For models employing bulk schemes, we suggest introducing correction factors based on observed hydrated aerosol spectra to improve the representation of aerosol hygroscopic growth. Second, aerosol-radiation-surface interactions are simplified in the present simulations, where the optical effects of aerosols and their water uptake on boundary-layer thermodynamic structure and surface energy balance are not explicitly considered. The nonlinear coupling between these effects and microphysical processes therefore remains clear, introducing additional uncertainty in the simulated fog evolution and its sensitivity to aerosol concentrations. For regions like the Po Valley, which are characterized by high aerosol loading and frequent wintertime fog events, changes in aerosol emissions may influence both the fog lifecycle and fog occurrence through multiple interacting pathways. In view of this, we will, in our future work, develop the model so that fully couples aerosol microphysical and radiative effects, which should not only improve the representation of individual fog events, but also further our understanding of long-term fog trends and related driving mechanisms.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>List of acronyms</title>
      <p id="d2e5632"><table-wrap position="anchor"><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Acronym</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CCN</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">cloud condensation nuclei</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ED</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">effective diameter</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAIRARI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fog and Aerosol Interaction Research Italy</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Large Eddy Simulation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Local Standard Time</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LWC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">liquid water content</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">LWP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">liquid water path</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MIMICA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MISU-MIT Cloud and Aerosol model</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OAT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">one-at-a-time</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">REF</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">reference simulation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">relative humidity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SPC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">San Pietro Capofiume</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SST</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">surface skin temperature</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SSM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">surface skin moisture</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TKE</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">turbulent kinetic energy</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">visibility</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5807">The sounding data for San Pietro Capofiume are provided by the University of Wyoming Atmospheric Science Radiosonde Archive (<uri>https://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.shtml</uri>, last access: 10 April 2024). Aerosol data from the FAIRARI campaign are available through the Data Center of the Bolin Center for Climate Research (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-3</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="altparen.76"/>). The LES model output is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-les2-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-les2-1</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.77"/>, and the MIMICA model code can be accessed at <uri>https://bitbucket.org/matthiasbrakebusch/mimicav5/src/master</uri> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="altparen.78"/>).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5832">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9721-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9721-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5841">Conceptualization: HD, SD, PZ, IR and AMLE; Data curation: HD, AN, RR, FM and AMLE; Formal analysis: HD, AN, RR, FM, KM and ABP; Funding acquisition: SD, IR and AMLE; Investigation: HD, AN, RR, FM, LH, KM, SD, CM, ABP, NM, PZ, IR and AMLE; Methodology: HD, AN, RR, FM, LH, KM, SD, CM, ABP, NM, PZ, IR and AMLE; Project administration: HD, SD, CM, PZ, IR and AMLE; Resources: SD, CM, PZ, IR and AMLE; Software: HD, ABP, NM and AMLE; Supervision: PZ, IR and AMLE; Validation: HD, ABP and NM; Visualization: HD, AN and AMLE; Writing – Original Draft: HD, AN, PZ, IR and AMLE; Writing – Review &amp; Editing: HD, AN, RR, FM, LH, KM, SD, CM, ABP, NM, PZ, IR and AMLE.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5847">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5856">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5862">Financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Project FORCeS under Grant Agreement 821205), European Research Council (Consolidator Grant INTEGRATE 865799) and Horizon Europe programme (Project CERTAINTY under Grant Agreement 101137680) is gratefully acknowledged. We also acknowledge financial support from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation through grants for project AtmoRemove (no. 2015.0162), AtmoCLOUD (nos. 2021.0169 and 2021.0298), and CLIVE (no. 2022.0104), as well as from Goran Gustafssons stiftelse and the Swedish Research Council (no. 2020–04158). The computations and data handling in MIMICA were enabled by resources provided by the National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden (NAISS), partially funded by the Swedish Research Council (no. 2022-06725).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5867">This research has been supported by the EU Horizon 2020 (grant no. 821205), the European Research Council, EU H2020 European Research Council (grant no. 865799), the European Commission, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme (grant no. 101137680), the Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (grant nos. 2015.0162, 2021.0169, 2021.0298, and 2022.0104), and the Vetenskapsrådet (grant nos. 2020–04158 and 2022-06725).The publication of this article was funded by the  Swedish Research Council, Forte, Formas, and Vinnova.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5878">This paper was edited by Paulo Ceppi and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Albrecht(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.245.4923.1227</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Alduchov and Eskridge(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Alduchov, O. A. and Eskridge, R. E.: Improved Magnus form approximation of saturation vapor pressure, J. Appl. Meteorol. Cimatol., 35, 601–609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035&lt;0601:IMFAOS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035&lt;0601:IMFAOS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Bari et al.(2015)Bari, Bergot, and El Khlifi</label><mixed-citation>Bari, D., Bergot, T., and El Khlifi, M.: Numerical study of a coastal fog event over Casablanca, Morocco, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 1894–1905, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2494" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2494</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bergot(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bergot, T.: Small-scale structure of radiation fog: a large-eddy simulation study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139, 1099–1112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2051" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2051</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bergot and Koracin(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Bergot, T. and Koracin, D.: Observation, simulation and predictability of fog: Review and perspectives, Atmosphere, 12, 235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos12020235</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bott(1991)</label><mixed-citation>Bott, A.: On the influence of the physico-chemical properties of aerosols on the life cycle of radiation fogs, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 56, 1–31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(90)90238-s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(90)90238-s</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bott et al.(1990)Bott, Sievers, and Zdunkowski</label><mixed-citation>Bott, A., Sievers, U., and Zdunkowski, W.: A radiation fog model with a detailed treatment of the interaction between radiative transfer and fog microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2153–2166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047&lt;2153:arfmwa&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047&lt;2153:arfmwa&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Boutle et al.(2018)Boutle, Price, Kudzotsa, Kokkola, and Romakkaniemi</label><mixed-citation>Boutle, I., Price, J., Kudzotsa, I., Kokkola, H., and Romakkaniemi, S.: Aerosol–fog interaction and the transition to well-mixed radiation fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7827–7840, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7827-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7827-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Boutle et al.(2022)Boutle, Angevine, Bao, Bergot, Bhattacharya, Bott, Ducongé, Forbes, Goecke, Grell, Hill, Igel, Kudzotsa, Lac, Maronga, Romakkaniemi, Schmidli, Schwenkel, Steeneveld, and Vié</label><mixed-citation>Boutle, I., Angevine, W., Bao, J.-W., Bergot, T., Bhattacharya, R., Bott, A., Ducongé, L., Forbes, R., Goecke, T., Grell, E., Hill, A., Igel, A. L., Kudzotsa, I., Lac, C., Maronga, B., Romakkaniemi, S., Schmidli, J., Schwenkel, J., Steeneveld, G.-J., and Vié, B.: Demistify: a large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) intercomparison of radiation fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-319-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Brenguier et al.(2011)Brenguier, Burnet, and Geoffroy</label><mixed-citation>Brenguier, J.-L., Burnet, F., and Geoffroy, O.: Cloud optical thickness and liquid water path – does the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> coefficient vary with droplet concentration?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9771–9786, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9771-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9771-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Contreras Osorio et al.(2022)Contreras Osorio, Martín Pérez, Ivarsson, Nielsen, de Rooy, Gleeson, and McAufield</label><mixed-citation>Contreras Osorio, S., Martín Pérez, D., Ivarsson, K.-I., Nielsen, K. P., de Rooy, W. C., Gleeson, E., and McAufield, E.: Impact of the Microphysics in HARMONIE-AROME on Fog, Atmosphere, 13, 2127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13122127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos13122127</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Decesari et al.(2017)Decesari, Sowlat, Hasheminassab, Sandrini, Gilardoni, Facchini, Fuzzi, and Sioutas</label><mixed-citation>Decesari, S., Sowlat, M. H., Hasheminassab, S., Sandrini, S., Gilardoni, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., and Sioutas, C.: Enhanced toxicity of aerosol in fog conditions in the Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7721–7731, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7721-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-7721-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Dimitrelos et al.(2020)Dimitrelos, Ekman, Caballero, and Savre</label><mixed-citation>Dimitrelos, A., Ekman, A. M. L., Caballero, R., and Savre, J.: A sensitivity study of Arctic air-mass transformation using large Eddy simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019jd031738</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Ding et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Ding, H., Neuberger, A., Ranjan, R., Mattsson, F., Heikkinen, L., Mansour, K., Decesari, S., Mohr, C., Baró Pérez, A., Mastroianni, N., Zieger, P., Riipinen, I., and Ekman, A. M. L.:  Large-eddy simulation of droplet and aerosol microphysics role in radiation fog from FAIRARI campaign, Po Valley, February 2022, Dataset version 1, Bolin Centre Database [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-les2-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-les2-1</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Dusek et al.(2006)Dusek, Frank, Hildebrandt, Curtius, Schneider, Walter, Chand, Drewnick, Hings, Jung, Borrmann, and Andreae</label><mixed-citation>Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J., Walter, S., Chand, D., Drewnick, F., Hings, S., Jung, D., Borrmann, S., and Andreae, M. O.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles, Science, 312, 1375–1378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1125261</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Ekman et al.(2006)Ekman, Wang, Ström, and Krejci</label><mixed-citation>Ekman, A. M. L., Wang, C., Ström, J., and Krejci, R.: Explicit simulation of aerosol physics in a cloud-resolving model: Aerosol transport and processing in the free troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 682–696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3645.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas3645.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Elias et al.(2009)Elias, Haeffelin, Drobinski, Gomes, Rangognio, Bergot, Chazette, Raut, and Colomb</label><mixed-citation> Elias, T., Haeffelin, M., Drobinski, P., Gomes, L., Rangognio, J., Bergot, T., Chazette, P., Raut, J.-C., and Colomb, M.: Particulate contribution to extinction of visible radiation: Pollution, haze, and fog, Atmos. Res., 92, 443–454, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Elias et al.(2015)Elias, Dupont, Hammer, Hoyle, Haeffelin, Burnet, and Jolivet</label><mixed-citation>Elias, T., Dupont, J.-C., Hammer, E., Hoyle, C. R., Haeffelin, M., Burnet, F., and Jolivet, D.: Enhanced extinction of visible radiation due to hydrated aerosols in mist and fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6605–6623, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6605-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-6605-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Frank et al.(1998)Frank, Martinsson, Cederfelt, Berg, Swietlicki, Wendisch, Yuskiewicz, Heintzenberg, Wiedensohler, Orsini, Stratmann, Laj, and Ricci</label><mixed-citation> Frank, G., Martinsson, B. G., Cederfelt, S.-I., Berg, O. H., Swietlicki, E., Wendisch, M., Yuskiewicz, B., Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Orsini, D., Stratmann, F., Laj, P., and Ricci, L.: Droplet formation and growth in polluted fogs, Contribut. Atmos. Phys., 71, 65–85, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Fu and Liou(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Fu, Q. and Liou, K.: Parameterization of the radiative properties of cirrus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2008–2025, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2008:POTRPO&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2008:POTRPO&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Fuzzi et al.(1992)Fuzzi, Facchini, Orsi, Lind, Wobrock, Kessel, Maser, Jaeschke, Enderle, Arends, Berner, Solly, Kruisz, Reischl, Pahl, Kaminski, Winkler, Ogren, Noone, Hallberg, Fierlinger-Oberlinninger, Puxbaum, Marzorati, Hansson, Wiedensohler, Svenningsson, Martinsson, Schell, and Georgii</label><mixed-citation>Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Orsi, G., Lind, J. A., Wobrock, W., Kessel, M., Maser, R., Jaeschke, W., Enderle, K. H., Arends, B. G., Berner, A., Solly, I., Kruisz, C., Reischl, G., Pahl, S., Kaminski, U., Winkler, P., Ogren, J. A., Noone, K. J., Hallberg, A., Fierlinger-Oberlinninger, H., Puxbaum, H., Marzorati, A., Hansson, H.-C., Wiedensohler, A., Svenningsson, I. B., Martinsson, B. G., Schell, D., and Georgii, H. W.: The Po Valley Fog Experiment 1989, Tellus B, 44, 448–468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15561" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15561</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Geoffroy et al.(2010)Geoffroy, Brenguier, and Burnet</label><mixed-citation>Geoffroy, O., Brenguier, J.-L., and Burnet, F.: Parametric representation of the cloud droplet spectra for LES warm bulk microphysical schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4835–4848, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4835-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4835-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Gultepe et al.(2006)Gultepe, Müller, and Boybeyi</label><mixed-citation>Gultepe, I., Müller, M. D., and Boybeyi, Z.: A new visibility parameterization for warm-fog applications in numerical weather prediction models, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 45, 1469–1480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2423.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jam2423.1</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Gultepe et al.(2007)Gultepe, Tardif, Michaelides, Cermak, Bott, Bendix, Müller, Pagowski, Hansen, Ellrod, Jacobs, Toth, and Cober</label><mixed-citation>Gultepe, I., Tardif, R., Michaelides, S. C., Cermak, J., Bott, A., Bendix, J., Müller, M. D., Pagowski, M., Hansen, B., Ellrod, G., Jacobs, W., Toth, G., and Cober, S. G.: Fog research: A review of past achievements and future perspectives, Pure Appl. Geophys., 164, 1121–1159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8419-7_3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-7643-8419-7_3</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Haeffelin et al.(2010)Haeffelin, Bergot, Elias, Tardif, Carrer, Chazette, Colomb, Drobinski, Dupont, Dupont, Guédalia, van der Hage, and Cammas</label><mixed-citation>Haeffelin, M., Bergot, T., Elias, T., Tardif, R., Carrer, D., Chazette, P., Colomb, M., Drobinski, P., Dupont, E., Dupont, J.-C., Guédalia, D., van der Hage, P. J. H., and Cammas, J.-P.: PARISFOG: Shedding new light on fog physical processes, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 767–783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009bams2671.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009bams2671.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hamed et al.(2007)Hamed, Joutsensaari, Mikkonen, Sogacheva, Dal Maso, Kulmala, Cavalli, Fuzzi, Facchini, Decesari, Mircea, Lehtinen, and Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Mikkonen, S., Sogacheva, L., Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Cavalli, F., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Mircea, M., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Laaksonen, A.: Nucleation and growth of new particles in Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 355–376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-355-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-355-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Hammer et al.(2014)Hammer, Gysel, Roberts, Elias, Hofer, Hoyle, Bukowiecki, Dupont, Burnet, Baltensperger, Hering, Jaffrezo, and Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>Hammer, E., Gysel, M., Roberts, G. C., Elias, T., Hofer, J., Hoyle, C. R., Bukowiecki, N., Dupont, J.-C., Burnet, F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Size-dependent particle activation properties in fog during the ParisFog 2012/13 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10517–10533, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10517-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10517-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Heikkinen et al.(2020)Heikkinen, Äijälä, Riva, Luoma, Dällenbach, Aalto, Aalto, Aliaga, Aurela, Keskinen, Makkonen, Rantala, Kulmala, Petäjä, Worsnop, and Ehn</label><mixed-citation>Heikkinen, L., Äijälä, M., Riva, M., Luoma, K., Dällenbach, K., Aalto, J., Aalto, P., Aliaga, D., Aurela, M., Keskinen, H., Makkonen, U., Rantala, P., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Long-term sub-micrometer aerosol chemical composition in the boreal forest: inter- and intra-annual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3151–3180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Hersbach et al.(2023)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Biavati, Horányi, Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Rozum, Schepers, Simmons, Soci, Dee, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus climate change service (c3s) climate data store (cds), 10, 24381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.bd0915c6</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Igel and van den Heever(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Igel, A. L. and van den Heever, S. C.: The importance of the shape of cloud droplet size distributions in shallow cumulus clouds. Part II: Bulk microphysics simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 259–273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0383.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas-d-15-0383.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Jia et al.(2019)Jia, Quan, Zheng, Liu, Liu, He, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>Jia, X., Quan, J., Zheng, Z., Liu, X., Liu, Q., He, H., and Liu, Y.: Impacts of anthropogenic aerosols on fog in North China Plain, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 252–265, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029437" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018jd029437</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Katata(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Katata, G.: Fogwater deposition modeling for terrestrial ecosystems: A review of developments and measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 8137–8159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014jd021669</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Kokkola et al.(2003)Kokkola, Romakkaniemi, and Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>Kokkola, H., Romakkaniemi, S., and Laaksonen, A.: On the formation of radiation fogs under heavily polluted conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 581–589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-581-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-581-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Koschmieder(1924)</label><mixed-citation> Koschmieder, H.: Theorie der horizontalen sichtweite, Beitrage zur Physik der Freien Atmosphare, Meteorol. Z., 12, 3353,  1924.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Lakra and Avishek(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Lakra, K. and Avishek, K.: A review on factors influencing fog formation, classification, forecasting, detection and impacts, Rend. Lincei.-Sci. Fis., 33, 319–353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-022-01060-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12210-022-01060-1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Leung et al.(2020)Leung, Gough, and Butler</label><mixed-citation>Leung, A. C., Gough, W. A., and Butler, K. A.: Changes in fog, ice fog, and low visibility in the Hudson Bay Region: Impacts on aviation, Atmosphere, 11, 186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020186" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos11020186</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Maalick et al.(2016)Maalick, Kühn, Korhonen, Kokkola, Laaksonen, and Romakkaniemi</label><mixed-citation>Maalick, Z., Kühn, T., Korhonen, H., Kokkola, H., Laaksonen, A., and Romakkaniemi, S.: Effect of aerosol concentration and absorbing aerosol on the radiation fog life cycle, Atmos. Environ., 133, 26–33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.018</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Maronga and Bosveld(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Maronga, B. and Bosveld, F.: Key parameters for the life cycle of nocturnal radiation fog: a comprehensive large-eddy simulation study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol.  Soc., 143, 2463–2480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3100</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Mazoyer et al.(2019)Mazoyer, Burnet, Denjean, Roberts, Haeffelin, Dupont, and Elias</label><mixed-citation>Mazoyer, M., Burnet, F., Denjean, C., Roberts, G. C., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., and Elias, T.: Experimental study of the aerosol impact on fog microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4323–4344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4323-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-4323-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Mazoyer et al.(2022)Mazoyer, Burnet, and Denjean</label><mixed-citation>Mazoyer, M., Burnet, F., and Denjean, C.: Experimental study on the evolution of droplet size distribution during the fog life cycle, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11305–11321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11305-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-11305-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Miles et al.(2000)Miles, Verlinde, and Clothiaux</label><mixed-citation>Miles, N. L., Verlinde, J., and Clothiaux, E. E.: Cloud droplet size distributions in low-level stratiform clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 57, 295–311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;0295:cdsdil&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;0295:cdsdil&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Morrison and Grabowski(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: Comparison of bulk and bin warm-rain microphysics models using a kinematic framework, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 2839–2861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3980" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas3980</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Morrison and Grabowski(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: Modeling supersaturation and subgrid-scale mixing with two-moment bulk warm microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 65, 792–812, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2374.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JAS2374.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Neuberger et al.(2025a)Neuberger, Ranjan, Ding, Mattsson, Haberstock, Baumgardner, Decesari, Ekman, Hughes, Mohr, Paglione, Riipinen, Rinaldi, and Zieger</label><mixed-citation>Neuberger, A., Ranjan, R., Ding, H., Mattsson, F., Haberstock, L., Baumgardner, D., Decesari, S., Ekman, A. M. L., Hughes, D. D., Mohr, C., Paglione, M., Riipinen, I., Rinaldi, M., and Zieger, P.: Importance of hydrated aerosol particles for aerosol-fog relationships in the Italian Po Valley, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5419" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-5419</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Neuberger et al.(2025b)Neuberger, Decesari, Aktypis, Andersen, Baumgardner, Bianchi, Busetto, Cai, Cermak, Dipu, Ekman, Fuzzi, Gramlich, Haslett, Heikkinen, Joutsensaari, Kaltsonoudis, Kangasluoma, Krejci, Lupi, Marinoni, Matrali, Mattsson, Mohr, Nenes, Paglione, Pandis, Patel, Riipinen, Rinaldi, Steimer, Stolzenburg, Sulo, Vasilakopoulou, and Zieger</label><mixed-citation>Neuberger, A., Decesari, S., Aktypis, A., Andersen, H., Baumgardner, D., Bianchi, F., Busetto, M., Cai, J., Cermak, J., Dipu, S., Ekman, A. M. L., Fuzzi, S., Gramlich, Y., Haslett, S. L., Heikkinen, L., Joutsensaari, J., Kaltsonoudis, C., Kangasluoma, J., Krejci, R., Lupi, A., Marinoni, A., Matrali, A., Mattsson, F., Mohr, C., Nenes, A., Paglione, M., Pandis, S. N., Patel, A., Riipinen, I., Rinaldi, M., Steimer, S. S., Stolzenburg, D., Sulo, J., Vasilakopoulou, C. N., and Zieger, P.: From Molecules to Droplets: The Fog and Aerosol Interaction Research Italy (FAIRARI) 2021/22 Campaign, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 106, E23–E50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-23-0166.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-d-23-0166.1</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Neuberger et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Neuberger, A., Decesari, S., Aktypis, A., Andersen, H., Baumgardner, D., Bianchi, F., Busetto, M., Cai, J., Cermak, J., Dipu, S., Ekman, A., Fuzzi, S., Gramlich, Y., Haslett, S. L., Heikkinen, L., Joutsensaari, J., Kaltsonoudis, C., Kangasluoma, J., Krejci, R., Lupi, A., Marinoni, A., Matrali, A., Mattsson, F., Mohr, C., Nenes, A., Paglione, M., Pandis, S. N., Patel, A., Riipinen, I., Rinaldi, M., Steimer, S. S., Stolzenburg, D., Sulo, J., Vasilakopoulou, C. N., and Zieger, P.: The fog and aerosol interaction research Italy (FAIRARI) campaign, November 2021 to May 2022. Dataset version 3, Bolin Centre Database [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-3</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Noone et al.(1992)Noone, Ogren, Hallberg, Heintzenberg, Ström, Hansson, Svenningsson, Wiedensohler, Fuzzi, Facchini, Arends, and Berner</label><mixed-citation>Noone, K. J., Ogren, J. A., Hallberg, A., Heintzenberg, J., Ström, J., Hansson, H.-C., Svenningsson, B., Wiedensohler, A., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Arends, B. G., and Berner, A.: Changes in aerosol size- and phase distributions due to physical and chemical processes in fog, Tellus B, 44, 489–504, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15563</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Paglione et al.(2020)Paglione, Gilardoni, Rinaldi, Decesari, Zanca, Sandrini, Giulianelli, Bacco, Ferrari, Poluzzi, Scotto, Trentini, Poulain, Herrmann, Wiedensohler, Canonaco, Prévôt, Massoli, Carbone, Facchini, and Fuzzi</label><mixed-citation>Paglione, M., Gilardoni, S., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Zanca, N., Sandrini, S., Giulianelli, L., Bacco, D., Ferrari, S., Poluzzi, V., Scotto, F., Trentini, A., Poulain, L., Herrmann, H., Wiedensohler, A., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Massoli, P., Carbone, C., Facchini, M. C., and Fuzzi, S.: The impact of biomass burning and aqueous-phase processing on air quality: a multi-year source apportionment study in the Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1233–1254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Pope and Igel(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Pope, N. H. and Igel, A. L.: Identifying Important Microphysical Properties and Processes for Marine Fog Forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 151, 2427–2441, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0294.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/mwr-d-22-0294.1</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Price(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Price, J.: Radiation fog. Part I: observations of stability and drop size distributions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 139, 167–191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9580-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-010-9580-2</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Riipinen et al.(2026)Riipinen, Talvinen, Chassaing, Georgakaki, Li, Pérez Garcia-Pando, Bergman, Kommula, Proske, Gkouvousis, Tsimpidi, Chatziparaschos, Neuberger, Karydis, Calderón, Romakkaniemi, Partridge, Khadir, Dada, Van Noije, Decesari, Seland, Zieger, Bender, Carslaw, Cermak, Costa-Surós, Ageitos, Gramlich, Haugvaldstad, Holopainen, Hoose, Jorba, Kakavas, Kanakidou, Kokkola, Krejci, Kühn, Kulmala, Le Sager, Makkonen, Manavi, Mentel, Milousis, Myriokefalitakis, Nenes, Nieminen, Pandis, Patoulias, Petäjä, Quaas, Regayre, Scholz, Schulz, Skyllakou, Sousse, Stier, Thomas, Villinger, Virtanen, Wyser, and Ekman</label><mixed-citation>Riipinen, I., Talvinen, S., Chassaing, A., Georgakaki, P., Li, X., Pérez Garcia-Pando, C., Bergman, T., Kommula, S., Proske, U., Gkouvousis, A., Tsimpidi, A., Chatziparaschos, M., Neuberger, A., Karydis, V., Calderón, S., Romakkaniemi, S., Partridge, D., Khadir, T., Dada, L., Van Noije, T., Decesari, S., Seland, O., Zieger, P., Bender, F., Carslaw, K., Cermak, J., Costa-Surós, M., Ageitos, M., Gramlich, Y., Haugvaldstad, O., Holopainen, E., Hoose, C., Jorba, O., Kakavas, S., Kanakidou, M., Kokkola, H., Krejci, R., Kühn, T., Kulmala, M., Le Sager, P., Makkonen, R., Manavi, S., Mentel, T., Milousis, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Nenes, A., Nieminen, T., Pandis, S., Patoulias, D., Petäjä, T., Quaas, J., Regayre, L., Scholz, S., Schulz, M., Skyllakou, K., Sousse, R., Stier, P., Thomas, M., Villinger, J., Virtanen, A., Wyser, K., and Ekman, A. M. L.: Treatment of key aerosol and cloud processes in Earth System Models – Recommendations from the FORCeS Project, Tellus B, 78, 1–66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.16993/tellusb.1883</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Rose et al.(2010)Rose, Nowak, Achtert, Wiedensohler, Hu, Shao, Zhang, Andreae, and Pöschl</label><mixed-citation>Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Savre et al.(2014)Savre, Ekman, and Svensson</label><mixed-citation>Savre, J., Ekman, A. M. L., and Svensson, G.: Technical note: Introduction to MIMICA, a large-eddy simulation solver for cloudy planetary boundary layers, J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 630–649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000292" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013MS000292</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Savre and Brakebusch(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Savre, J. and Brakebusch, M.: MIMICA LES model v5, Bitbucket [code], <uri>https://bitbucket.org/matthiasbrakebusch/mimicav5/src/master</uri> (last access: 3 June 2025), 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Schwarz et al.(2024)Schwarz, Savre, Sudhakar, Quaas, and Ekman</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, M., Savre, J., Sudhakar, D., Quaas, J., and Ekman, A. M. L.: The Transition from Aerosol-to Updraft-Limited Susceptibility Regime in Large-Eddy Simulations with Bulk Microphysics, Tellus B, 76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.94" ext-link-type="DOI">10.16993/tellusb.94</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Schwenkel and Maronga(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Schwenkel, J. and Maronga, B.: Large-eddy simulation of radiation fog with comprehensive two-moment bulk microphysics: impact of different aerosol activation and condensation parameterizations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7165–7181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7165-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-7165-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Seifert and Beheng(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection, Atmos. Res., 59, 265–281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Seifert and Beheng(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2016)</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons,   2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Stokes and Robinson(1966)</label><mixed-citation>Stokes, R. H. and Robinson, R. A.: Interactions in Aqueous Nonelectrolyte Solutions. I. Solute-Solvent Equilibria, The J. Phys. Chem., 70, 2126–2131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/j100879a010</ext-link>, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Stolaki et al.(2015)Stolaki, Haeffelin, Lac, Dupont, Elias, and Masson</label><mixed-citation>Stolaki, S., Haeffelin, M., Lac, C., Dupont, J.-C., Elias, T., and Masson, V.: Influence of aerosols on the life cycle of a radiation fog event. A numerical and observational study, Atmos. Res., 151, 146–161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.013</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Stull(1988)</label><mixed-citation>Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Twomey(1977)</label><mixed-citation>Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034&lt;1149:tiopot&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034&lt;1149:tiopot&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Wainwright et al.(2021)Wainwright, Chang, and Richter</label><mixed-citation>Wainwright, C., Chang, R. Y.-W., and Richter, D.: Aerosol activation in radiation fog at the atmospheric radiation program Southern Great Plains site, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jd035358" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021jd035358</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Wang et al.(2023)Wang, Lu, Niu, Lv, Jia, Xu, Xue, Zhu, and Yan</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Lu, C., Niu, S., Lv, J., Jia, X., Xu, X., Xue, Y., Zhu, L., and Yan, S.: Diverse dispersion effects and parameterization of relative dispersion in urban fog in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037514, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037514" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022jd037514</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Wobrock et al.(1992)Wobrock, Schell, Maser, Kessel, Jaeschke, Fuzzi, Facchini, Orsi, Marzorati, Winkler, Arends, and Bendix</label><mixed-citation>Wobrock, W., Schell, D., Maser, R., Kessel, M., Jaeschke, W., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Orsi, G., Marzorati, A., Winkler, P., Arends, B. G., and Bendix, J.: Meteorological characteristics of the Po Valley fog, Tellus B, 44, 469–488, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15562" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15562</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Wurtz et al.(2021)Wurtz, Bouniol, Vié, and Lac</label><mixed-citation>Wurtz, J., Bouniol, D., Vié, B., and Lac, C.: Evaluation of the AROME model's ability to represent ice crystal icing using in situ observations from the HAIC 2015 field campaign, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 147, 2796–2817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4100</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Yan et al.(2020)Yan, Zhu, Huang, Zhu, Kang, Lu, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>Yan, S., Zhu, B., Huang, Y., Zhu, J., Kang, H., Lu, C., and Zhu, T.: To what extents do urbanization and air pollution affect fog?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5559–5572, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5559-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5559-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Yan et al.(2021)Yan, Zhu, Zhu, Shi, Liu, Kang, Lu, and Lu</label><mixed-citation>Yan, S., Zhu, B., Zhu, T., Shi, C., Liu, D., Kang, H., Lu, W., and Lu, C.: The effect of aerosols on fog lifetime: Observational evidence and model simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL61803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020gl091156</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Musson-Genon, Dupont, Milliez, and Carissimo</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Musson-Genon, L., Dupont, E., Milliez, M., and Carissimo, B.: On the influence of a simple microphysics parametrization on radiation fog modelling: A case study during parisfog, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 151, 293–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9894-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-013-9894-y</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The importance of aerosol and droplet microphysics for the properties and life cycle of radiation fog in the Po Valley</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Albrecht(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness,
Science, 245, 1227–1230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Alduchov and Eskridge(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alduchov, O. A. and Eskridge, R. E.: Improved Magnus form approximation of
saturation vapor pressure, J. Appl. Meteorol. Cimatol., 35,
601–609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035&lt;0601:IMFAOS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1996)035&lt;0601:IMFAOS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Bari et al.(2015)Bari, Bergot, and El Khlifi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bari, D., Bergot, T., and El Khlifi, M.: Numerical study of a coastal fog event
over Casablanca, Morocco, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol.
Soc., 141, 1894–1905, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2494" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2494</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bergot(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergot, T.: Small-scale structure of radiation fog: a large-eddy simulation
study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 139,
1099–1112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2051" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2051</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bergot and Koracin(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bergot, T. and Koracin, D.: Observation, simulation and predictability of fog:
Review and perspectives, Atmosphere, 12, 235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020235</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bott(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bott, A.: On the influence of the physico-chemical properties of aerosols on
the life cycle of radiation fogs, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 56, 1–31,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(90)90238-s" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(90)90238-s</a>, 1991.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bott et al.(1990)Bott, Sievers, and Zdunkowski</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bott, A., Sievers, U., and Zdunkowski, W.: A radiation fog model with a
detailed treatment of the interaction between radiative transfer and fog
microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 2153–2166,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047&lt;2153:arfmwa&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1990)047&lt;2153:arfmwa&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Boutle et al.(2018)Boutle, Price, Kudzotsa, Kokkola, and
Romakkaniemi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boutle, I., Price, J., Kudzotsa, I., Kokkola, H., and Romakkaniemi, S.: Aerosol–fog interaction and the transition to well-mixed radiation fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7827–7840, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7827-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7827-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Boutle et al.(2022)Boutle, Angevine, Bao, Bergot, Bhattacharya, Bott,
Ducongé, Forbes, Goecke, Grell, Hill, Igel, Kudzotsa, Lac, Maronga,
Romakkaniemi, Schmidli, Schwenkel, Steeneveld, and Vié</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boutle, I., Angevine, W., Bao, J.-W., Bergot, T., Bhattacharya, R., Bott, A., Ducongé, L., Forbes, R., Goecke, T., Grell, E., Hill, A., Igel, A. L., Kudzotsa, I., Lac, C., Maronga, B., Romakkaniemi, S., Schmidli, J., Schwenkel, J., Steeneveld, G.-J., and Vié, B.: Demistify: a large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) intercomparison of radiation fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Brenguier et al.(2011)Brenguier, Burnet, and
Geoffroy</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brenguier, J.-L., Burnet, F., and Geoffroy, O.: Cloud optical thickness and liquid water path – does the <i>k</i> coefficient vary with droplet concentration?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9771–9786, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9771-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9771-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Contreras Osorio et al.(2022)Contreras Osorio, Martín Pérez,
Ivarsson, Nielsen, de Rooy, Gleeson, and McAufield</label><mixed-citation>
      
Contreras Osorio, S., Martín Pérez, D., Ivarsson, K.-I., Nielsen,
K. P., de Rooy, W. C., Gleeson, E., and McAufield, E.: Impact of the
Microphysics in HARMONIE-AROME on Fog, Atmosphere, 13, 2127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13122127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13122127</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Decesari et al.(2017)Decesari, Sowlat, Hasheminassab, Sandrini,
Gilardoni, Facchini, Fuzzi, and Sioutas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Decesari, S., Sowlat, M. H., Hasheminassab, S., Sandrini, S., Gilardoni, S., Facchini, M. C., Fuzzi, S., and Sioutas, C.: Enhanced toxicity of aerosol in fog conditions in the Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7721–7731, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7721-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7721-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Dimitrelos et al.(2020)Dimitrelos, Ekman, Caballero, and
Savre</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dimitrelos, A., Ekman, A. M. L., Caballero, R., and Savre, J.: A sensitivity
study of Arctic air-mass transformation using large Eddy simulation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031738,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd031738</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Ding et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, H., Neuberger, A., Ranjan, R., Mattsson, F., Heikkinen, L., Mansour, K., Decesari, S., Mohr, C., Baró Pérez, A., Mastroianni, N., Zieger, P., Riipinen, I., and Ekman, A. M. L.:  Large-eddy simulation of droplet and aerosol microphysics role in radiation fog from FAIRARI campaign, Po Valley, February 2022, Dataset version 1, Bolin Centre Database [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-les2-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-les2-1</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Dusek et al.(2006)Dusek, Frank, Hildebrandt, Curtius, Schneider,
Walter, Chand, Drewnick, Hings, Jung, Borrmann, and Andreae</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., Curtius, J., Schneider, J., Walter,
S., Chand, D., Drewnick, F., Hings, S., Jung, D., Borrmann, S., and Andreae,
M. O.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of
aerosol particles, Science, 312, 1375–1378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125261</a>,
2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Ekman et al.(2006)Ekman, Wang, Ström, and Krejci</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ekman, A. M. L., Wang, C., Ström, J., and Krejci, R.: Explicit simulation
of aerosol physics in a cloud-resolving model: Aerosol transport and
processing in the free troposphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 63,
682–696, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3645.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3645.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Elias et al.(2009)Elias, Haeffelin, Drobinski, Gomes, Rangognio,
Bergot, Chazette, Raut, and Colomb</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elias, T., Haeffelin, M., Drobinski, P., Gomes, L., Rangognio, J., Bergot, T.,
Chazette, P., Raut, J.-C., and Colomb, M.: Particulate contribution to
extinction of visible radiation: Pollution, haze, and fog, Atmos.
Res., 92, 443–454, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Elias et al.(2015)Elias, Dupont, Hammer, Hoyle, Haeffelin, Burnet,
and Jolivet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elias, T., Dupont, J.-C., Hammer, E., Hoyle, C. R., Haeffelin, M., Burnet, F., and Jolivet, D.: Enhanced extinction of visible radiation due to hydrated aerosols in mist and fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6605–6623, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6605-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6605-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Frank et al.(1998)Frank, Martinsson, Cederfelt, Berg, Swietlicki,
Wendisch, Yuskiewicz, Heintzenberg, Wiedensohler, Orsini, Stratmann, Laj, and
Ricci</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frank, G., Martinsson, B. G., Cederfelt, S.-I., Berg, O. H., Swietlicki, E.,
Wendisch, M., Yuskiewicz, B., Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Orsini, D.,
Stratmann, F., Laj, P., and Ricci, L.: Droplet formation and growth in
polluted fogs, Contribut. Atmos. Phys., 71, 65–85, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fu and Liou(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fu, Q. and Liou, K.: Parameterization of the radiative properties of cirrus
clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 2008–2025,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2008:POTRPO&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050&lt;2008:POTRPO&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Fuzzi et al.(1992)Fuzzi, Facchini, Orsi, Lind, Wobrock, Kessel,
Maser, Jaeschke, Enderle, Arends, Berner, Solly, Kruisz, Reischl, Pahl,
Kaminski, Winkler, Ogren, Noone, Hallberg, Fierlinger-Oberlinninger, Puxbaum,
Marzorati, Hansson, Wiedensohler, Svenningsson, Martinsson, Schell, and
Georgii</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Orsi, G., Lind, J. A., Wobrock, W., Kessel, M.,
Maser, R., Jaeschke, W., Enderle, K. H., Arends, B. G., Berner, A., Solly,
I., Kruisz, C., Reischl, G., Pahl, S., Kaminski, U., Winkler, P., Ogren,
J. A., Noone, K. J., Hallberg, A., Fierlinger-Oberlinninger, H., Puxbaum, H.,
Marzorati, A., Hansson, H.-C., Wiedensohler, A., Svenningsson, I. B.,
Martinsson, B. G., Schell, D., and Georgii, H. W.: The Po Valley Fog
Experiment 1989, Tellus B, 44, 448–468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15561" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15561</a>,
1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Geoffroy et al.(2010)Geoffroy, Brenguier, and Burnet</label><mixed-citation>
      
Geoffroy, O., Brenguier, J.-L., and Burnet, F.: Parametric representation of the cloud droplet spectra for LES warm bulk microphysical schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4835–4848, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4835-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4835-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Gultepe et al.(2006)Gultepe, Müller, and Boybeyi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gultepe, I., Müller, M. D., and Boybeyi, Z.: A new visibility
parameterization for warm-fog applications in numerical weather prediction
models, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 45, 1469–1480,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2423.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jam2423.1</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Gultepe et al.(2007)Gultepe, Tardif, Michaelides, Cermak, Bott,
Bendix, Müller, Pagowski, Hansen, Ellrod, Jacobs, Toth, and
Cober</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gultepe, I., Tardif, R., Michaelides, S. C., Cermak, J., Bott, A., Bendix, J.,
Müller, M. D., Pagowski, M., Hansen, B., Ellrod, G., Jacobs, W., Toth,
G., and Cober, S. G.: Fog research: A review of past achievements and future
perspectives, Pure Appl. Geophys., 164, 1121–1159,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8419-7_3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8419-7_3</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Haeffelin et al.(2010)Haeffelin, Bergot, Elias, Tardif, Carrer,
Chazette, Colomb, Drobinski, Dupont, Dupont, Guédalia, van der Hage, and
Cammas</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haeffelin, M., Bergot, T., Elias, T., Tardif, R., Carrer, D., Chazette, P.,
Colomb, M., Drobinski, P., Dupont, E., Dupont, J.-C., Guédalia, D., van der
Hage, P. J. H., and Cammas, J.-P.: PARISFOG: Shedding new light on fog
physical processes, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91,
767–783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009bams2671.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009bams2671.1</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hamed et al.(2007)Hamed, Joutsensaari, Mikkonen, Sogacheva, Dal Maso,
Kulmala, Cavalli, Fuzzi, Facchini, Decesari, Mircea, Lehtinen, and
Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Mikkonen, S., Sogacheva, L., Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Cavalli, F., Fuzzi, S., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Mircea, M., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Laaksonen, A.: Nucleation and growth of new particles in Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 355–376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-355-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-355-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Hammer et al.(2014)Hammer, Gysel, Roberts, Elias, Hofer, Hoyle,
Bukowiecki, Dupont, Burnet, Baltensperger, Hering, Jaffrezo, and
Weingartner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hammer, E., Gysel, M., Roberts, G. C., Elias, T., Hofer, J., Hoyle, C. R., Bukowiecki, N., Dupont, J.-C., Burnet, F., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Size-dependent particle activation properties in fog during the ParisFog 2012/13 field campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10517–10533, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10517-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10517-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Heikkinen et al.(2020)Heikkinen, Äijälä, Riva, Luoma, Dällenbach,
Aalto, Aalto, Aliaga, Aurela, Keskinen, Makkonen, Rantala, Kulmala, Petäjä,
Worsnop, and Ehn</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heikkinen, L., Äijälä, M., Riva, M., Luoma, K., Dällenbach, K., Aalto, J., Aalto, P., Aliaga, D., Aurela, M., Keskinen, H., Makkonen, U., Rantala, P., Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., and Ehn, M.: Long-term sub-micrometer aerosol chemical composition in the boreal forest: inter- and intra-annual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3151–3180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3151-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Hersbach et al.(2023)Hersbach, Bell, Berrisford, Biavati,
Horányi, Muñoz Sabater, Nicolas, Peubey, Radu, Rozum, Schepers,
Simmons, Soci, Dee, and Thépaut</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I.,
Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5
hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus climate
change service (c3s) climate data store (cds), 10, 24381,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Igel and van den Heever(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Igel, A. L. and van den Heever, S. C.: The importance of the shape of cloud
droplet size distributions in shallow cumulus clouds. Part II: Bulk
microphysics simulations, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 259–273,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0383.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0383.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Jia et al.(2019)Jia, Quan, Zheng, Liu, Liu, He, and Liu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jia, X., Quan, J., Zheng, Z., Liu, X., Liu, Q., He, H., and Liu, Y.: Impacts of
anthropogenic aerosols on fog in North China Plain, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 252–265, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029437" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018jd029437</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Katata(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Katata, G.: Fogwater deposition modeling for terrestrial ecosystems: A review
of developments and measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 8137–8159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd021669</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Kokkola et al.(2003)Kokkola, Romakkaniemi, and
Laaksonen</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kokkola, H., Romakkaniemi, S., and Laaksonen, A.: On the formation of radiation fogs under heavily polluted conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 581–589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-581-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-581-2003</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Koschmieder(1924)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Koschmieder, H.: Theorie der horizontalen sichtweite, Beitrage zur Physik der
Freien Atmosphare, Meteorol. Z., 12, 3353,  1924.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Lakra and Avishek(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lakra, K. and Avishek, K.: A review on factors influencing fog formation,
classification, forecasting, detection and impacts, Rend. Lincei.-Sci. Fis., 33, 319–353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-022-01060-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-022-01060-1</a>,
2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Leung et al.(2020)Leung, Gough, and Butler</label><mixed-citation>
      
Leung, A. C., Gough, W. A., and Butler, K. A.: Changes in fog, ice fog, and low
visibility in the Hudson Bay Region: Impacts on aviation, Atmosphere, 11,
186, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020186" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos11020186</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Maalick et al.(2016)Maalick, Kühn, Korhonen, Kokkola, Laaksonen,
and Romakkaniemi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maalick, Z., Kühn, T., Korhonen, H., Kokkola, H., Laaksonen, A., and
Romakkaniemi, S.: Effect of aerosol concentration and absorbing aerosol on
the radiation fog life cycle, Atmos. Environ., 133, 26–33,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.03.018</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Maronga and Bosveld(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Maronga, B. and Bosveld, F.: Key parameters for the life cycle of nocturnal
radiation fog: a comprehensive large-eddy simulation study, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol.  Soc., 143, 2463–2480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3100</a>,
2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Mazoyer et al.(2019)Mazoyer, Burnet, Denjean, Roberts, Haeffelin,
Dupont, and Elias</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mazoyer, M., Burnet, F., Denjean, C., Roberts, G. C., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., and Elias, T.: Experimental study of the aerosol impact on fog microphysics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4323–4344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4323-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4323-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Mazoyer et al.(2022)Mazoyer, Burnet, and Denjean</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mazoyer, M., Burnet, F., and Denjean, C.: Experimental study on the evolution of droplet size distribution during the fog life cycle, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11305–11321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11305-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11305-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Miles et al.(2000)Miles, Verlinde, and Clothiaux</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miles, N. L., Verlinde, J., and Clothiaux, E. E.: Cloud droplet size
distributions in low-level stratiform clouds, J. Atmos.
Sci., 57, 295–311,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;0295:cdsdil&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057&lt;0295:cdsdil&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Morrison and Grabowski(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: Comparison of bulk and bin warm-rain
microphysics models using a kinematic framework, J. Atmos.
Sci., 64, 2839–2861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3980" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jas3980</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Morrison and Grabowski(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Morrison, H. and Grabowski, W. W.: Modeling supersaturation and subgrid-scale
mixing with two-moment bulk warm microphysics, J. Atmos.
Sci., 65, 792–812, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2374.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAS2374.1</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Neuberger et al.(2025a)Neuberger, Ranjan, Ding, Mattsson, Haberstock,
Baumgardner, Decesari, Ekman, Hughes, Mohr, Paglione, Riipinen, Rinaldi, and
Zieger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neuberger, A., Ranjan, R., Ding, H., Mattsson, F., Haberstock, L., Baumgardner, D., Decesari, S., Ekman, A. M. L., Hughes, D. D., Mohr, C., Paglione, M., Riipinen, I., Rinaldi, M., and Zieger, P.: Importance of hydrated aerosol particles for aerosol-fog relationships in the Italian Po Valley, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5419" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5419</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Neuberger et al.(2025b)Neuberger, Decesari, Aktypis, Andersen,
Baumgardner, Bianchi, Busetto, Cai, Cermak, Dipu, Ekman, Fuzzi, Gramlich,
Haslett, Heikkinen, Joutsensaari, Kaltsonoudis, Kangasluoma, Krejci, Lupi,
Marinoni, Matrali, Mattsson, Mohr, Nenes, Paglione, Pandis, Patel, Riipinen,
Rinaldi, Steimer, Stolzenburg, Sulo, Vasilakopoulou, and
Zieger</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neuberger, A., Decesari, S., Aktypis, A., Andersen, H., Baumgardner, D.,
Bianchi, F., Busetto, M., Cai, J., Cermak, J., Dipu, S., Ekman, A. M. L.,
Fuzzi, S., Gramlich, Y., Haslett, S. L., Heikkinen, L., Joutsensaari, J.,
Kaltsonoudis, C., Kangasluoma, J., Krejci, R., Lupi, A., Marinoni, A.,
Matrali, A., Mattsson, F., Mohr, C., Nenes, A., Paglione, M., Pandis, S. N.,
Patel, A., Riipinen, I., Rinaldi, M., Steimer, S. S., Stolzenburg, D., Sulo,
J., Vasilakopoulou, C. N., and Zieger, P.: From Molecules to Droplets: The
Fog and Aerosol Interaction Research Italy (FAIRARI) 2021/22 Campaign,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 106, E23–E50,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-23-0166.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-23-0166.1</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Neuberger et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neuberger, A., Decesari, S., Aktypis, A., Andersen, H., Baumgardner, D., Bianchi, F., Busetto, M., Cai, J., Cermak, J., Dipu, S., Ekman, A., Fuzzi, S., Gramlich, Y., Haslett, S. L., Heikkinen, L., Joutsensaari, J., Kaltsonoudis, C., Kangasluoma, J., Krejci, R., Lupi, A., Marinoni, A., Matrali, A., Mattsson, F., Mohr, C., Nenes, A., Paglione, M., Pandis, S. N., Patel, A., Riipinen, I., Rinaldi, M., Steimer, S. S., Stolzenburg, D., Sulo, J., Vasilakopoulou, C. N., and Zieger, P.: The fog and aerosol interaction research Italy (FAIRARI) campaign, November 2021 to May 2022. Dataset version 3, Bolin Centre Database [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17043/fairari-2021-2022-3</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Noone et al.(1992)Noone, Ogren, Hallberg, Heintzenberg, Ström,
Hansson, Svenningsson, Wiedensohler, Fuzzi, Facchini, Arends, and
Berner</label><mixed-citation>
      
Noone, K. J., Ogren, J. A., Hallberg, A., Heintzenberg, J., Ström, J.,
Hansson, H.-C., Svenningsson, B., Wiedensohler, A., Fuzzi, S., Facchini,
M. C., Arends, B. G., and Berner, A.: Changes in aerosol size- and phase
distributions due to physical and chemical processes in fog, Tellus B, 44,
489–504, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15563</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Paglione et al.(2020)Paglione, Gilardoni, Rinaldi, Decesari, Zanca,
Sandrini, Giulianelli, Bacco, Ferrari, Poluzzi, Scotto, Trentini, Poulain,
Herrmann, Wiedensohler, Canonaco, Prévôt, Massoli, Carbone, Facchini, and
Fuzzi</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paglione, M., Gilardoni, S., Rinaldi, M., Decesari, S., Zanca, N., Sandrini, S., Giulianelli, L., Bacco, D., Ferrari, S., Poluzzi, V., Scotto, F., Trentini, A., Poulain, L., Herrmann, H., Wiedensohler, A., Canonaco, F., Prévôt, A. S. H., Massoli, P., Carbone, C., Facchini, M. C., and Fuzzi, S.: The impact of biomass burning and aqueous-phase processing on air quality: a multi-year source apportionment study in the Po Valley, Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 1233–1254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-1233-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Petters and Kreidenweis(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petters, M. D. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1961–1971, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Pope and Igel(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pope, N. H. and Igel, A. L.: Identifying Important Microphysical Properties and
Processes for Marine Fog Forecasts, Mon. Weather Rev., 151, 2427–2441,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0294.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-22-0294.1</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Price(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Price, J.: Radiation fog. Part I: observations of stability and drop size
distributions, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 139, 167–191,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9580-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9580-2</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Riipinen et al.(2026)Riipinen, Talvinen, Chassaing, Georgakaki, Li,
Pérez Garcia-Pando, Bergman, Kommula, Proske, Gkouvousis, Tsimpidi,
Chatziparaschos, Neuberger, Karydis, Calderón, Romakkaniemi, Partridge,
Khadir, Dada, Van Noije, Decesari, Seland, Zieger, Bender, Carslaw, Cermak,
Costa-Surós, Ageitos, Gramlich, Haugvaldstad, Holopainen, Hoose, Jorba,
Kakavas, Kanakidou, Kokkola, Krejci, Kühn, Kulmala, Le Sager, Makkonen,
Manavi, Mentel, Milousis, Myriokefalitakis, Nenes, Nieminen, Pandis,
Patoulias, Petäjä, Quaas, Regayre, Scholz, Schulz, Skyllakou, Sousse,
Stier, Thomas, Villinger, Virtanen, Wyser, and Ekman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riipinen, I., Talvinen, S., Chassaing, A., Georgakaki, P., Li, X., Pérez
Garcia-Pando, C., Bergman, T., Kommula, S., Proske, U., Gkouvousis, A.,
Tsimpidi, A., Chatziparaschos, M., Neuberger, A., Karydis, V., Calderón, S.,
Romakkaniemi, S., Partridge, D., Khadir, T., Dada, L., Van Noije, T.,
Decesari, S., Seland, O., Zieger, P., Bender, F., Carslaw, K., Cermak, J.,
Costa-Surós, M., Ageitos, M., Gramlich, Y., Haugvaldstad, O., Holopainen,
E., Hoose, C., Jorba, O., Kakavas, S., Kanakidou, M., Kokkola, H., Krejci,
R., Kühn, T., Kulmala, M., Le Sager, P., Makkonen, R., Manavi, S., Mentel,
T., Milousis, A., Myriokefalitakis, S., Nenes, A., Nieminen, T., Pandis, S.,
Patoulias, D., Petäjä, T., Quaas, J., Regayre, L., Scholz, S., Schulz, M.,
Skyllakou, K., Sousse, R., Stier, P., Thomas, M., Villinger, J., Virtanen,
A., Wyser, K., and Ekman, A. M. L.: Treatment of key aerosol and cloud
processes in Earth System Models – Recommendations from the FORCeS Project,
Tellus B, 78, 1–66,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1883" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.1883</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Rose et al.(2010)Rose, Nowak, Achtert, Wiedensohler, Hu, Shao, Zhang,
Andreae, and Pöschl</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rose, D., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Hu, M., Shao, M., Zhang, Y., Andreae, M. O., and Pöschl, U.: Cloud condensation nuclei in polluted air and biomass burning smoke near the mega-city Guangzhou, China – Part 1: Size-resolved measurements and implications for the modeling of aerosol particle hygroscopicity and CCN activity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3365–3383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3365-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Savre et al.(2014)Savre, Ekman, and Svensson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Savre, J., Ekman, A. M. L., and Svensson, G.: Technical note: Introduction to
MIMICA, a large-eddy simulation solver for cloudy planetary boundary layers,
J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 6, 630–649,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000292" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013MS000292</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Savre and Brakebusch(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Savre, J. and Brakebusch, M.: MIMICA LES model v5, Bitbucket [code],
<a href="https://bitbucket.org/matthiasbrakebusch/mimicav5/src/master" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 June 2025), 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Schwarz et al.(2024)Schwarz, Savre, Sudhakar, Quaas, and
Ekman</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwarz, M., Savre, J., Sudhakar, D., Quaas, J., and Ekman, A. M. L.: The
Transition from Aerosol-to Updraft-Limited Susceptibility Regime in
Large-Eddy Simulations with Bulk Microphysics, Tellus B, 76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.94" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.16993/tellusb.94</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Schwenkel and Maronga(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwenkel, J. and Maronga, B.: Large-eddy simulation of radiation fog with comprehensive two-moment bulk microphysics: impact of different aerosol activation and condensation parameterizations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 7165–7181, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7165-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-7165-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Seifert and Beheng(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A double-moment parameterization for simulating
autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection, Atmos. Res., 59,
265–281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Seifert and Beheng(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization
for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description, Meteorol.
Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Seinfeld and Pandis(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air
pollution to climate change, John Wiley &amp; Sons,   2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Stokes and Robinson(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stokes, R. H. and Robinson, R. A.: Interactions in Aqueous Nonelectrolyte
Solutions. I. Solute-Solvent Equilibria, The J. Phys. Chem.,
70, 2126–2131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/j100879a010</a>, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Stolaki et al.(2015)Stolaki, Haeffelin, Lac, Dupont, Elias, and
Masson</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stolaki, S., Haeffelin, M., Lac, C., Dupont, J.-C., Elias, T., and Masson, V.:
Influence of aerosols on the life cycle of a radiation fog event. A numerical
and observational study, Atmos. Res., 151, 146–161,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.04.013</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Stull(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Twomey(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds,
J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034&lt;1149:tiopot&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034&lt;1149:tiopot&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1977.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Wainwright et al.(2021)Wainwright, Chang, and
Richter</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wainwright, C., Chang, R. Y.-W., and Richter, D.: Aerosol activation in
radiation fog at the atmospheric radiation program Southern Great Plains
site, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD035358,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jd035358" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021jd035358</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Wang et al.(2023)Wang, Lu, Niu, Lv, Jia, Xu, Xue, Zhu, and
Yan</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Lu, C., Niu, S., Lv, J., Jia, X., Xu, X., Xue, Y., Zhu, L., and Yan,
S.: Diverse dispersion effects and parameterization of relative dispersion in
urban fog in eastern China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
128, e2022JD037514, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037514" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022jd037514</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Wobrock et al.(1992)Wobrock, Schell, Maser, Kessel, Jaeschke, Fuzzi,
Facchini, Orsi, Marzorati, Winkler, Arends, and Bendix</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wobrock, W., Schell, D., Maser, R., Kessel, M., Jaeschke, W., Fuzzi, S.,
Facchini, M. C., Orsi, G., Marzorati, A., Winkler, P., Arends, B. G., and
Bendix, J.: Meteorological characteristics of the Po Valley fog, Tellus B,
44, 469–488, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15562" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v44i5.15562</a>, 1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Wurtz et al.(2021)Wurtz, Bouniol, Vié, and Lac</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wurtz, J., Bouniol, D., Vié, B., and Lac, C.: Evaluation of the AROME
model's ability to represent ice crystal icing using in situ observations
from the HAIC 2015 field campaign, Q. J. Roy.
Meteorol. Soc., 147, 2796–2817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4100</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Yan et al.(2020)Yan, Zhu, Huang, Zhu, Kang, Lu, and Zhu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yan, S., Zhu, B., Huang, Y., Zhu, J., Kang, H., Lu, C., and Zhu, T.: To what extents do urbanization and air pollution affect fog?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5559–5572, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5559-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5559-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Yan et al.(2021)Yan, Zhu, Zhu, Shi, Liu, Kang, Lu, and Lu</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yan, S., Zhu, B., Zhu, T., Shi, C., Liu, D., Kang, H., Lu, W., and Lu, C.: The
effect of aerosols on fog lifetime: Observational evidence and model
simulations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL61803,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091156</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Zhang et al.(2014)Zhang, Musson-Genon, Dupont, Milliez, and
Carissimo</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X., Musson-Genon, L., Dupont, E., Milliez, M., and Carissimo, B.: On the
influence of a simple microphysics parametrization on radiation fog
modelling: A case study during parisfog, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 151,
293–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9894-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9894-y</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
