<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-9493-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>The changing sensitivity of wintertime particulate nitrate to precursor emissions diagnosed via GEOS-Chem and satellite observations of ammonia and nitrogen dioxide over the Midwestern United States</article-title><alt-title>Wintertime particulate nitrate sensitivity trends</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vo</surname><given-names>Toan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Christiansen</surname><given-names>Amy E.</given-names></name>
          <email>achristiansen@umkc.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0114-1924</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Division of Energy, Matter &amp; Systems, University of Missouri – Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 64110, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Amy E. Christiansen (achristiansen@umkc.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>7</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>9493</fpage><lpage>9508</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>30</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Toan Vo</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e87">Particulate nitrate (PN) is a critical component of fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>). During wintertime, the contribution of PN to PM<sub>2.5</sub> over the Midwestern United States (MWUS), an agriculturally intensive region, has increased over the past decade and now contributes up to 40 % of the particle mass. PN formation is controlled by nitrogen oxides <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>), and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). To best control wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden, it is critical to determine PN formation sensitivity to precursor gases, but this is not well constrained. Prior efforts to diagnose PN sensitivity have been limited on both spatial and temporal scales. Satellite tropospheric column NH<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratios cover large areas and long timeframes, and they have been shown to be effective in diagnosing PN sensitivity over East Asia, Europe, and the Eastern United States. Here, we expand this approach to quantify spatially and temporally resolved multidecadal wintertime PN formation sensitivity to NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, and VOCs in the MWUS from 2007 to 2023 via satellite observations and GEOS-Chem sensitivity simulations. More than half of the total diagnosed pixels are classified as NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive in 2007, and this increases to 89.0 % by 2023. VOCs do not control MWUS PN formation. The shift in PN formation sensitivity is explained by relatively flat trends in satellite NO<sub>2</sub> column densities (0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60 % yr<sup>−1</sup>) in combination with increases in satellite NH<sub>3</sub> column densities (1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 % yr<sup>−1</sup>). Our work indicates that targeting NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions is chemically effective for reducing wintertime PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e293">PM<sub>2.5</sub>, particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or less, is the largest environmental health risk factor in the United States (Di et al., 2017; Pokharel et al., 2023; Shi et al., 2022; Tessum et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2018). PM<sub>2.5</sub> is formed via acid-base reactions between the acidic precursor species, nitrogen oxides <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>), and the basic gas ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) to form ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate. Regulations on SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions via the Clean Air Act have led to notable decreases in the PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden across the United States over the past few decades, primarily through the reduction in particulate nitrate (PN) and particulate sulfate (PS) (Hand et al., 2012). PS, which has historically dominated the inorganic fraction of PM<sub>2.5</sub>, has decreased more quickly than PN, increasing the relative contribution of PN to total PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass. PN concentrations are highest during wintertime because the gas-to-particle partitioning of PN is favored at low temperatures (Pitchford et al., 2009). During wintertime over the Midwestern United States (MWUS), a highly agricultural region, the PN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PS ratio has increased, as PS has decreased at a faster rate compared to PN over the past decade (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The increase in relative PN abundance may also be influenced by increases in the atmospheric lifetime of total nitrate during wintertime (Zhai et al., 2021). Over the MWUS, wintertime PN now comprises up to 40 % of the total PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass on average.</p>
      <p id="d2e434">PN is highly hygroscopic, which affects particle properties and enhances the reflectivity of particles (Wang et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019). PN has been found to drive pollution events over certain regions of the US (Franchin et al., 2018; Womack et al., 2019) and the globe (Qin et al., 2024; Xu et al., 2019). PN has also become the controlling factor behind particle water uptake in some regions, impacting particle chemical processes and visibility (Christiansen et al., 2020; Jefferson et al., 2017). Recent studies have shown that the products from PN photolysis may influence the formation of tropospheric O<sub>3</sub> and thus atmospheric oxidation capacity (Cao et al., 2022; Gen et al., 2022; Sarwar et al., 2024). It is critical to accurately understand PN properties and formation to better understand PN impacts and create effective policy that controls PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden.</p>
      <p id="d2e455">NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are critical to the formation of PN (Wang et al., 2023a). During the daytime, NO<sub>2</sub> is oxidized to HNO<sub>3</sub> via reaction with hydroxyl radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). HNO<sub>3</sub> then reacts with NH<sub>3</sub> to form ammonium nitrate, which partitions into the particle phase. During nighttime, PN is formed via the heterogenous hydrolysis of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, which is formed from the oxidation of NO<sub>2</sub> with ozone (O<sub>3</sub>). In these mechanisms, the availability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<sub>3</sub> are highly dependent on VOC abundance. Thus, PN formation is sensitive to the precursor gases NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and VOCs, and its formation is controlled by whichever precursor gas is the limiting reagent. Competing mechanisms with organic molecules also contribute to total PN, but the exact mechanisms and processes behind organo-nitrate formation are not well constrained, and inorganic nitrate is most prominent in particles (Romer Present et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2023a).</p>
      <p id="d2e601">Precursor gas emissions have changed drastically over the past few decades, potentially altering PN formation sensitivity and its relative contribution to total PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass. Urban NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions dominated by anthropogenic sources have decreased by 40 % from 2005 to 2018 across the US (Jiang et al., 2022). Over rural areas, total surface NO<sub>2</sub> trends decreased strongly until 2010, after which they flattened. The decreasing prevalence of urban NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions have caused rural total NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> trends to be influenced more strongly by relatively constant background emissions (e.g., lightning, soil), and NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> trends over rural areas post-2010 are typically insignificant (Christiansen et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2022; Silvern et al., 2019). Satellite NO<sub>2</sub> column densities show similar flattening trends after 2010, which is attributed to the increasingly strong relative influence of free tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> in satellite column trends (Dang et al., 2023a; Fioletov et al., 2022; He et al., 2022; Jiang et al., 2018; Tong et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e678">In contrast, NH<sub>3</sub> is not regulated as a criterion pollutant, although there exist some regulations on agricultural NH<sub>3</sub> practices, which target livestock emissions (US EPA, 2014). Recently, satellite NH<sub>3</sub> column densities have increased strongly over the US (2.40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.45 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2002 to 2018), which matches increases in surface NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations (Van Damme et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2023b; Yu et al., 2018). The increase in NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations over the agricultural Central United States is disproportionately higher than over the US as a whole, ranging from 1 % yr<sup>−1</sup>–7 % yr<sup>−1</sup> (Yu et al., 2018). This increase can be explained by increases in emissions from both agriculture (Vo and  Christiansen, 2024; Yang et al., 2023) and vehicles (Fenn et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2017; Walters et al., 2022), as well as decreases in NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions that increase unreacted NH<sub>3</sub> abundance (Warner et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d2e798">Anthropogenic VOC emissions are low during winter, but they have continuously decreased over time. Urban VOC emissions over the United States have decreased by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>36.4 % from 2000 to 2019, which is attributable to decreases in transportation and industrial solvent emissions (Xiong et al., 2024). Emissions of isoprene, a biogenic VOC, conversely showed an increase of 0.14 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2000 to 2020 in US, which is primarily influenced by meteorological factors and changes in vegetation coverage (Wang et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e820">To most effectively reduce PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden, it is critical to understand how these large changes in precursor gas emissions have influenced PN formation sensitivity over time. Over past decades, controlling NH<sub>3</sub> emissions has been suggested to be most effective in reducing wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden over agricultural regions, but more recent analyses suggest that NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> controls may now be more effective, although at a higher cost and more technologically complex approach than NH<sub>3</sub> controls (Guo et al., 2024; Holt et al., 2015; Pan et al., 2024; Paulot et al., 2014; Pinder et al., 2007; Wiegand et al., 2022). Therefore, the most effective strategy to control PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> in agriculturally impacted areas, such as the MWUS regions, remains an open question. Few prior studies have attempted to diagnose PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensitivity to precursor gases in the MWUS. Holt et al. (2015) diagnosed the wintertime inorganic PM<sub>2.5</sub> sensitivity over the US to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions between 2005 and 2012 using only GEOS-Chem simulations and found that NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> sensitivity increased over time (Holt et al., 2015). Dang et al. (2024) conducted a PN formation sensitivity diagnosis over the US across all seasons in 2017, but this focused mostly on the Eastern US and covered very little of agricultural MWUS (Dang et al., 2024). Neither of these studies captured the long-term (multidecadal) dynamics of wintertime PN formation sensitivity over highly agricultural areas.</p>
      <p id="d2e933">Determining PN formation sensitivity has traditionally proven challenging. Methods used in previous studies are subject to large uncertainties, especially in the measurement of HNO<sub>3</sub> (Franchin et al., 2018; Petetin et al., 2016), are computationally intensive (Paulot et al., 2016; Shimadera et al., 2014; Zhai et al., 2021), and typically have only been applied to short timeframes (Nenes et al., 2020; Wen et al., 2018; Zhai et al., 2023). Recently, Dang et al. (2023b) introduced an innovative approach to overcome these limitations and diagnose PN sensitivity using satellite tropospheric column NH<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratios and chemical transport models without the need for HNO<sub>3</sub> measurements or exceedingly computationally intensive calculations (Dang et al., 2023b). Importantly, this method can quickly diagnose PN sensitivity to precursor gases across a broad region and a longer timeframe due to the large spatial and temporal coverage of satellite observations. This approach has been applied on short timeframes over East Asia, Europe, and the Eastern United States across all seasons with high accuracy when compared to previous studies (Dang et al., 2024). Here, we will expand this methodology over the MWUS to track multidecadal changes in wintertime PN formation sensitivity.</p>
      <p id="d2e979">In this work, we evaluate changes in wintertime PN formation sensitivity by quantifying the changes in the sensitivity regime of wintertime PN to NH<sub>3</sub>, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, and VOCs over the MWUS from 2007 to 2023 via satellite observations of NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> column density and model sensitivity simulations. We also explore whether controlling NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions or controlling NH<sub>3</sub> emissions is the best PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> mitigation strategy over the MWUS during winter. These methods can be expanded in the future to investigate PN formation sensitivity in other seasons, as both NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> exhibit strong seasonality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Satellite observations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>General information</title>
      <p id="d2e1086">NO<sub>2</sub> column density was obtained from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) using version 4.0 of the NASA OMI/Aura NO<sub>2</sub> Level 2 product (<uri>https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/OMNO2_003/summary</uri>, last access: 27 October 2025). OMI is operated onboard the sun-synchronous NASA Earth Observing System (EOS) Aura satellite (Krotkov et al., 2019). NO<sub>2</sub> is detected at visible wavelengths (402–465 nm), and the measurements are in swaths of 2600 km width at 13:45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0:15 local solar time; LST (Lamsal et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e1126">NH<sub>3</sub> column density was obtained from the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) onboard the Metop-A and Metop-B sun-synchronous satellites (Clarisse and Coheur, 2018a, b) (<uri>https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/catalog/?currentSelection=871d9366-22d7-4d8d-997e-02e7721f7e94#masthead</uri>, last access: 30 October 2025, for Metop-A; <uri>https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/catalog/?currentSelection=44a739bf-8b68-4b64-b594-d7bb3fbe40bf#masthead</uri>, last access: 31 October 2025, for Metop-B). Here, we use the reanalyzed daily IASI/Metop-A (2007–2020) and IASI/Metop-B (2021–2023) dataset (ANNI-NH3-v4R). This satellite provides measurements twice daily in the morning (09:30 LST) and the evening (21:30 LST) (Van Damme et al., 2014). In this study, we use only morning overpass measurements to minimize time separation from OMI (13:45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0:15 LST). IASI captures backscattered infrared radiation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 645–2760 cm<sup>−1</sup>) of atmospheric trace gases directly perpendicular to Earth's surface with a 12 km circular footprint (Clerbaux et al., 2009; Van Damme et al., 2017).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Analyzing satellite observations</title>
      <p id="d2e1179">The methodology of this study is summarized in Fig. S2. We obtained NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> column density from winter 2007 to winter 2023 over the MWUS (36 to 49° latitude and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>104 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>87° longitude) from OMI and IASI. We used measurements from November, December, January, and February to represent winter to ensure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % coverage over the MWUS both spatially and temporally due to the limited satellite sensitivity. For NO<sub>2</sub> columns, we filtered out any pixels with solar zenith angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 85°, cloud fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3, terrain reflectivity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3, NO<sub>2</sub> column density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, and any observations impacted by the row anomaly, which arose from problems with radiance measurements (Dang et al., 2023b). For NH<sub>3</sub> column density, we then removed any pixels with cloud fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, NH<sub>3</sub> column density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0, and pixels with limited sensitivity to NH<sub>3</sub> using the post retrieval quality flag (Dang et al., 2023b).</p>
      <p id="d2e1310">Next, both NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> data sets were averaged seasonally to a 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625° resolution (latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) to spatially match the GEOS-Chem simulation pixels (see Sect. 3), and we removed any grid cells with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 successful retrievals to further reduce noise. We computed the median NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> column density for each pixel for each winter to visualize the distribution of precursor gases over MWUS from 2007 to 2023.</p>
      <p id="d2e1371">To reduce potential errors arising from differences in the assumed vertical profiles between OMI and GEOS-Chem, a correction factor was calculated to adjust air mass factors (AMFs). Differences in underlying vertical profile assumptions can lead to inconsistencies between the model and satellite observations. We replaced the a priori profile used in the OMI retrieval to match that of GEOS-Chem to minimize those errors (Visser et al., 2019). For NO<sub>2</sub> column density, we applied the method described by Lamsal et al. (2010), Boersma et al. (2016), and Visser et al. (2019) to derive a correction factor, which we applied to the AMF in OMI for each aggregated grid cell (Eq. 1) (Boersma et al., 2016; Lamsal et al., 2010; Visser et al., 2019).

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M130" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMI</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            In Eq. (1), AMF<sub>OMI</sub> is the air mass factor from OMI, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the averaging kernel, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is NO<sub>2</sub> column density obtained from GEOS-Chem in molec. cm<sup>−2</sup> (Boersma et al., 2016; Lamsal et al., 2010; Visser et al., 2019). The averaging kernel is obtained by taking the ratios of scattering weight and AMF<sub>OMI</sub> at each level (Boersma et al., 2016; Palmer et al., 2001). Then, the newly calculated AMFs (AMF<sub>GC</sub>) were used to correct the NO<sub>2</sub> column density (NO<sub>2,OMI</sub>) from OMI (Eq. 2). In Eq. (2), NO<sub>2,new</sub> is the corrected OMI NO<sub>2</sub> column, with the underlying a priori profile replaced by the profile in GEOS-Chem.

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M142" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">new</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMI</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OMI</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e1624">Note that correction of satellite column densities by replacing a priori vertical profiles with those from GEOS-Chem only applies to NO<sub>2</sub> since there is not enough information from IASI to correct satellite NH<sub>3</sub> column densities. We then calculated the winter average of satellite NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> from the median of each grid cell over the MWUS for each year from 2007 to 2023. We then computed the wintertime NH<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratios across the MWUS by overlaying spatial and temporal 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625° composites of NH<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> column density.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>GEOS-Chem simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e1723">We used the 3D chemical transport model GEOS-Chem to examine the sensitivity of PN formation to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and VOCs. The simulation parameters are summarized in Table 1. In this study, we used GEOS-Chem version 14.4.2, and all the simulations were performed at the nested 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625° horizontal resolution with boundary conditions from a global 4° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5° resolution simulation (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12807579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.12807579</ext-link>, Yantosca et al., 2024; Wang et al., 2004). Next, we assumed that January could represent the entire winter season to reduce computational burden (Dang et al., 2023b). Although GEOS-Chem underestimates observed PN mass concentrations, trends in wintertime PN simulated by GEOS-Chem and observations from the IMPROVE and CSN networks agree well (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 between GEOS-Chem and ground monitoring networks) (Fig. S3). We will evaluate the performance of GEOS-Chem further in Sect. 2.5.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1783">Description of GEOS-Chem simulations</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GEOS-Chem version 14.4.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Horizontal resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nested 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625° resolution with the boundary conditions from a global 4° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5°</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">resolution simulations<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemistry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.4.2<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Meteorology</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2)<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Anthropogenic emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Community Emissions Data System (CEDS) and National Emissions Inventory 2016 (NEI 2016)<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Biomass burning emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Quick Fire Emissions Dataset, version 2 (QFED2)<sup>e</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e1786"><sup>a</sup> Wang et al. (2004). <sup>b</sup> <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12807579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.12807579</ext-link> (Yantosca et al., 2024). <sup>c</sup> Gelaro et al. (2017); <sup>d</sup> Hoesly et al. (2018). <sup>e</sup> Darmenov and da Silva (2015).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1976">All sensitivity simulations were conducted using 72 vertical pressure levels from 2007 to 2022. GEOS-Chem includes detailed HO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-VOC-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>BrO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-aerosol tropospheric chemistry with over 200 species. We used the reanalysis product Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), developed by the NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO), for meteorological inputs (Gelaro et al., 2017). Emissions were computed by the Harvard-NASA Emissions Component (HEMCO) (Keller et al., 2014). All global anthropogenic emissions were provided by the Community Emissions Data System inventory (Hoesly et al., 2018). Until winter 2018, these emissions were overwritten over the CONUS by the National Emissions Inventory 2016 (NEI 2016) at 0.1° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1° resolution, which was created by NEI Collaborative for air quality modeling over the United States (National Emissions Inventory Collaborative, 2019). Since NEI emissions in the model were only available through January 2019, we used the CEDS inventory at the 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5° resolution after to simulate anthropogenic emissions over the CONUS (Hoesly et al., 2018). Despite some differences in estimates of emissions magnitudes, which mainly arise from differences in horizontal resolution and the methods used in estimating agricultural emissions, the CEDS and NEI2016 inventories show similar trends (Fig. S4), and both predict the same wintertime PN sensitivity at various time slices and locations from 2007 to 2019 (see Sect. 3.1 and Fig. S5), suggesting the sensitivity findings are continuous regardless of inventory (Hoesly et al., 2018; Inventory Collaborative 2016v1 Emissions Modelling Platform, 2020).</p>
      <p id="d2e2034">Aircraft emissions were taken from the Aviation Emissions Inventory Code 2019 (AEIC 2019), which covered up to 2019 (Simone et al., 2013). Emissions after 2019 were kept constant at 2019 values. Offline soil NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions were used, which were provided by Hudman et al. (2012), and offline biogenic VOC emissions were provided by the Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN) as implemented by Hu et al. (2015) from 2007 to 2020 (Guenther et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2015; Hudman et al., 2012). Similar to aircraft emissions, emissions after 2020 for soil NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and biogenic VOC emissions were kept constant at 2020 values. Biomass burning emissions were provided by the Quick Fire Emissions Dataset, version 2 (QFED2) (Darmenov and da Silva, 2015). Thermodynamic PN formation was calculated with ISORROPIA-II (Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007). We used the Luo et al. (2020) wet deposition scheme to improve the accuracy of modelled PN (Luo et al., 2020). The PN photolysis scheme is described by Shah et al. (2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e2055">Sensitivity simulations used to quantify formation regime cutoffs are summarized in Table 2. The standard simulation (“Base”) was conducted from 2007 to 2022, where no modifications were applied to any emissions. The sensitivity of PN formation to the precursor gases NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and VOCs was evaluated with 3 simulations: (1) “Reduced-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>”, where NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions were decreased by 20 %; (2) “Reduced-NH<sub>3</sub>”, where NH<sub>3</sub> emissions were decreased by 20 %; and (3) “Reduced-VOC”, where VOC emissions were decreased by 20 % (Dang et al., 2023b; 2024). The total quantities (in Tg) for NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, and VOC emissions for each sensitivity simulation from 2007 to 2022 are shown in Fig. S6. In each sensitivity simulation, the decrease of the precursor gas applied to all emissions sources (natural and anthropogenic). We chose a perturbation of 20 % because it is in line with the model's ability to capture changes in PN. Throughout the timeframe, GEOS-Chem captures wintertime PN trends well (see Sect. 2.5) through changes in NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions that span 20 %–50 % (Fig. S4), suggesting the model will be able to accurately capture the impacts of a 20 % perturbation in emissions. Other analyses using this method similarly use 20 % (Dang et al., 2023b, 2024). Each sensitivity simulation was run with a full-year spin up for boundary conditions (4° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5°) followed by 1-week spin up for nested simulations (0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625°). Production runs were performed for January of each year. These sensitivity simulations allowed us to examine the influence of each precursor gas on wintertime PN formation, how that sensitivity changed over time, and quantify cutoffs for PN formation regime determination.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2167">Description of all sensitivity simulations using GEOS-Chem 14.4.2.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Simulations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">NH<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">VOC</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">emissions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">emissions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Base</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reduced-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Base</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reduced-NH<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Base</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reduced-VOC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Base</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Ground monitoring observations</title>
      <p id="d2e2337">The descriptions of all ground monitoring observations and the locations of each site are summarized in Fig. 1 and Table 3. We define winter in this analysis to be November, December, January, and February to match satellite retrievals. In addition, we analyze trends in gas concentrations, wet deposition, and particle speciation and compare them to satellite NO<sub>2</sub> column densities, NH<sub>3</sub> column densities, and model simulations to place results into context. We assume NWD and surface NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations trends are representative of the entire MWUS. While this introduces uncertainty, the agreement of trends between satellite and ground observations is excellent. This will be further discussed in Sect. 3.</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2369">Site locations for Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN), Chemical Speciation Network (CSN), US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMPROVE), and National Trends Network (NTN) ground monitoring networks. Note that some sites are part of multiple networks.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2381">Description of ground monitoring networks.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Retrievals</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Descriptions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Citations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">of Sites</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface NO<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 h average daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Demerjian (2000);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<uri>https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html#Daily</uri>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">surface NO<sub>2</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">United States</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">last access: 1 November 2025)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">concentrations using</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Environmental</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">chemiluminescent</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Protection Agency</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">detectors, primarily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(US EPA, 2025)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">over urban areas.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">National Trends Network (NTN)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nitrate wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Bi-weekly samples via</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Lamb and Bowersox</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<uri>https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/networks/national-trends-network/</uri>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">deposition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">an automated wet</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(2000);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">last access: 1 November 2025)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(NWD)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">precipitation collector</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">National Trends</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">and a rain gauge, mainly</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Network (NTN, 2025)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">located over rural areas.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface NH<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Puchalski et</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<uri>https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/networks/ammonia-monitoring-network/</uri>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">using Radiello-brand</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">al. (2015);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">last access: 1 November 2025)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">diffusive samplers</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Ammonia Monitoring</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">located mainly</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Network (AMoN, 2025)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">over rural areas.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 h integrated PM<sub>2.5</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Malm et al. (1994),</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Environments (IMRPOVE)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentrations and</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">and chemical speciation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Solomon et al. (2014);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<uri>https://views.cira.colostate.edu/fed/QueryWizard/</uri>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">chemical speciation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mass concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Interagency Monitoring</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">last access: 1 November 2025)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(PN, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, PS, and</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">every 3 d over</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">of PROtected Visual</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">total organic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">rural areas.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Environments</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">carbon (OC))</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(IMPROVE)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chemical Speciation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24 h integrated PM<sub>2.5</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Solomon et al. (2014);</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Network (CSN)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">concentrations and</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">and chemical speciation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">United States</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(<uri>https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html#Daily</uri>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">chemical speciation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">mass concentrations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Environmental</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">last access: 1 November 2025)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(PN, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">every 3 d over</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Protection Agency</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">organic carbon (OC))</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">urban areas.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(US EPA, 2025)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>PN formation sensitivity diagnostic methods</title>
      <p id="d2e2997">We calculated the local PN sensitivity to each precursor gas, S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub>, for individual 0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.625° grid cells from GEOS-Chem using Eq. (3). Here, we calculated the ratio of the changes in monthly PN concentrations to changes in emissions of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the sensitivity and Base simulations. In Eq. (3), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, NH<sub>3</sub>, or VOCs (Dang et al., 2023b).

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M219" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PN</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          We then chose all the pixels with sensitivity ratios of 0.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.05 from 2007 to 2023 (i.e., sites without a distinct dominant regime for PN sensitivity), where S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> is the dominant sensitivity, and S<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> is the one of the other two sensitivities different from S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> (e.g., if S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> is S<sub>NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub></sub>, then S<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> is S<sub>NO<sub>3</sub></sub> or S<sub>VOC</sub>), to perform reduced-major-axis linear regression and deduce the wintertime PN sensitivity regime cutoff (Fig. S7) (Dang et al., 2023b). In this work, we chose to derive the regime cutoffs for the whole timeframe instead of deriving for individual years because there was not enough data without a dominant regime in some years to perform the regression. However, it is important to note that long-term trends in the formation sensitivity are the same whether using individual year or multi-year regressions (Fig. S8). We focused on the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive and NH<sub>3</sub>-sensitive regime because MWUS PN had limited sensitivity to VOC emissions during wintertime (Sect. 3.1). After diagnosing the PN sensitivity for each pixel for each winter season, we analyzed the changes in PN sensitivity from 2007 to 2023.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>GEOS-Chem evaluation</title>
      <p id="d2e3248">We perform a series of simulations in GEOS-Chem to assess the sensitivity of PN to changes in precursor gas emissions from 2007 to 2022. First, we establish the reliability of GEOS-Chem for this analysis by evaluating the ability of the GEOS-Chem Base simulations to reproduce ground monitoring observations and trends. We compare PN magnitudes and trends during January and sample GEOS-Chem at the IMPROVE and CSN monitoring locations (Fig. S3). On average, GEOS-Chem underestimates wintertime PN mass concentrations by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33.6 % compared to ground observations (GEOS-Chem: 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, IMPROVE: 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CSN: 2.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The biases in modelled PN may be due to uncertainties in nighttime chemistry, especially N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake and the extent to which residual upper-planetary boundary layer PN sinks to the ground, emissions inventories, aerosol liquid water, and wet deposition of HNO<sub>3</sub> (Norman et al., 2025; Travis et al., 2022; Heald et al., 2012; Curci et al., 2015; Tang et al., 2021). Despite underestimation, GEOS-Chem shows good agreement with ground monitor trends, indicating that the sensitivity of PN to changes in emissions is captured. PN mass concentrations from GEOS-Chem show a decreasing trend from 2007 to 2013 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3 % yr<sup>−1</sup>), which then flattens from 2014 to 2022 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.16 % yr<sup>−1</sup>). This is consistent with the trends from CSN and IMPROVE on average: PN decreases by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.5 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2007 to 2013, and it flattens afterward to 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 % yr<sup>−1</sup>. Thus, GEOS-Chem successfully captures the decrease and subsequent flattening trends of wintertime PN over both rural (IMPROVE) and urban (CSN) areas from 2007 to 2022. Modeled nitrate wet deposition is overestimated by 139 %, but nitrate wet deposition trends are also captured well by GEOS-Chem (Fig. S9) (Luo et al., 2020; Christiansen et al., 2024; Silvern et al., 2019).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and Discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Diagnosing PN sensitivity regime over the MWUS</title>
      <p id="d2e3458">The local model sensitivity of PN, S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub>, is calculated by Eq. (3) for each model grid cell to derive the regime cutoffs using reduced-major-axis linear regression. PN is not sensitive to changes in VOC emissions (Reduced-VOC) at any point during the timeframe. In the Reduced-VOC simulation, changes in PN as a result of a 20 % decrease in VOC emissions range from 0.84 % to 4.0 %, which is substantially lower than changes seen in the Reduced-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and Reduced-NH<sub>3</sub> simulations (range of 6.0 % to 21.6 %) (Fig. 2). Hence, S<sub>VOC</sub> is excluded from the regression, although it is shown in Fig. 3a for illustration.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3499">The percentage difference in PN mass concentrations between the Base simulations and Reduced-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> simulations (red), Base simulations and Reduced-NH<sub>3</sub> simulations (blue), and Base simulations and Reduced-VOC simulations (green). The solid lines indicate sensitivity simulations using the NEI2016 emissions inventory, and the dashed lines and points indicate sensitivity simulations using the CEDS emissions inventory.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3528">Wintertime PN formation sensitivity over the MWUS. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the wintertime PN diagnostic regime cutoffs using GEOS-Chem and satellite observations. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is satellite tropospheric NH<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratio, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis is satellite NO<sub>2</sub> column densities from OMI. The colors of the data points shown here are GEOS-Chem-calculated local PN sensitivity to each precursor gas (S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub>). The data points are GEOS-Chem-calculated sensitivity ratios (S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1) in independent model grid cells. Blue squares represent the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive regime, red circles represent the NH<sub>3</sub>-sensitive regime, and green triangles represent the VOC-sensitive regime. As no pixels are dominated by VOC-sensitive regime (i.e., no S<sub>VOC</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1), only pixels with sensitivity values S<sub>VOC</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 are shown for illustration but not included in calculations. The regression line is derived via reduced-major-axis linear regression using pixels of all years with sensitivity ratios of 0.95 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.05. Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> shows the wintertime PN formation sensitivity over the MWUS in 2007 and in 2023, respectively, after satellite grid cell ratios are placed into sensitivity regimes using Eqs. (4) and (5). In panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, pink indicates NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive regions, and blue indicates NH<sub>3</sub>-sensitive regions.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3770">In Fig. 3, each point represents a GEOS-Chem grid cell with a dominant wintertime PN sensitivity regime (i.e., S<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> S<sub><italic>j</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.1) plotted at its corresponding independent satellite NO<sub>2</sub> column densities and satellite tropospheric NH<sub>3</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> ratios. Some overlap of data points in Fig. 3a is expected for two reasons: (1) this figure combines all dominant sites from 2007 to 2022, and (2) wintertime NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations shift drastically across the timeframe. As noted previously, the trend in the shift of PN formation regimes is the same regardless of whether we determine formation regimes with individual-year or combined-year data (Fig. S8). After performing reduced-major-axis linear regression, the diagnostic cutoffs for NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub>-senstive regimes are expressed by Inequalities (4) and (5).

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M298" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sensitive</mml:mtext><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sensitive</mml:mtext><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4010">The percentage of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive pixel counts over the MWUS (red) and over just urban areas (blue) (2007–2023).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4028">The percent differences in PN mass concentrations between the Base and Reduced-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> simulations increase from 14.6 % in 2007 to 21.6 % in 2022. By contrast, the percent differences between the Base and Reduced-NH<sub>3</sub> simulations decrease from 12.3 % in 2007 to 6.0 % in 2022 (Fig. 2). Together, these results suggest that PN is becoming increasingly sensitive to NO<sub><italic>x</italic> </sub>emissions and less sensitive to NH<sub>3</sub> emissions. Our satellite-based results are consistent with an independent analysis of chemical mechanics (Sect. S1 in the Supplement) and PN thermodynamic sensitivity (Sect. S2). This is covered in more detail in the Supplement, but briefly, we use the thermodynamic equilibrium model ISORROPIA-II to investigate the thermodynamic sensitivity of PN and the roles of other potential drivers of trends (Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007). Our results suggest that the thermodynamics of wintertime PN formation over the MWUS is shifting away from NH<sub>3</sub>-sensitivity (Fig. S10 and Sect. S2), consistent with our satellite-based diagnostic, and that PN trends cannot be explained by changes in aerosol liquid water, meteorological variability, or N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> uptake (Sect. S1).</p>
      <p id="d2e4097">Quantitatively, the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive regime is the dominant regime in the MWUS, as the distribution of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive grid cells is always <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 % (Fig. 4), and this is especially prevalent over the Central MWUS (Movie S1 in the Video supplement). In 2007, 60.4 % of the diagnosed pixels are NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive, but this increases to 89.0 % in 2023 (Figs. 3 and 4). The largest shift in PN sensitivity over the MWUS occurs after 2013, where 76.9 % of the total diagnosed pixels are classified as NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive on average from 2014 to 2023, compared to 66.0 % on average from 2007 to 2013 (Fig. 4). Satellite NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> column uncertainties may propagate to errors in classification. We find that accounting for the extreme ends of the uncertainty may cause a change in diagnosed sensitivity regime in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % of the classified grid cells, but wintertime PN formation shows a consistent shift toward a predominant NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive regime after 2013 in all cases (Fig. S11). PN sensitivity over urban areas also follows the shifts in regime found for the rural MWUS (Fig. 4). Our findings are consistent with previous studies which diagnosed PN sensitivity over agricultural areas. Holt et al. (2015) found that the wintertime sensitivity of inorganic PM<sub>2.5</sub> over Northern Midwest has become more sensitive to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions in 2012 compared to 2005 (Holt et al., 2015). Wintertime PN formation is also NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive over South Korea, where 76 % of anthropogenic NH<sub>3</sub> emissions originate from livestock (Oak et al., 2025). In addition, Guo et al. (2018) found that PN formation is more sensitive to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> than NH<sub>3</sub> during wintertime over an agricultural area in the Netherlands (Guo et al., 2018). Overall, our findings suggest that MWUS PN formation was sensitive to both changes in NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions from 2007 to 2013, but this has shifted to a predominantly NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive regime afterward.</p>
      <p id="d2e4261">The distribution of PN sensitivity regimes from 2007 to 2023 over the MWUS is shown in Movie S1. Spatially, much of the shift in PN formation sensitivity is driven by changes in emissions over the eastern portion of the MWUS, which is more densely populated. In 2007, MWUS PN formation was highly sensitive to NH<sub>3</sub> emissions over the eastern part of MWUS (Fig. 3b, c), which shifted strongly toward NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> sensitivity by 2023. The shift in formation regime is consistent with the spatial trends of NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> column densities (Movies S2–S4, Fig. S12).</p>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4303">Wintertime NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> column density trends over the MWUS (2007–2023). Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the trends between nitrate wet deposition (NWD) (blue) from NADP and NO<sub>2</sub> column density over the MWUS (red) from OMI. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the trends between surface NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations (blue) from AMoN and NH<sub>3</sub> column density (red) from IASI (2007–2023).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4364">The shift in PN sensitivity regime over the MWUS is consistent with the trends in wintertime NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> satellite column densities and ground observations. We find that these trends cannot be explained by meteorological variability, and instead rely on aerosol chemistry and thermodynamic processes (Fig. S13 and Sect. S2). The trends of satellite NO<sub>2</sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> column densities from 2007 to 2023 with uncertainties are shown in Fig. S14. Trends in NO<sub>2</sub> column densities stayed relatively flat from 2007 to 2023 (0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60 % yr<sup>−1</sup>) (Fig. 5a). The relatively flat trends in satellite NO<sub>2</sub> are consistent with prior analyses of satellite trends over rural areas and nitrate wet deposition (NWD), a good proxy for regional NO<sub>2</sub>. Prior decreases in rural NO<sub>2</sub> have flattened out over time due to the increasing relative importance of static background NO<sub>2</sub> sources, such as soils, lightning, and biomass burning, as anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions decrease (Fig. S4) (Christiansen et al., 2024; Jiang et al., 2018; Silvern et al., 2019). This is consistent with the flattening trends in NWD, a proxy for regional NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> trends (Fig. S15). When we compare satellite NO<sub>2</sub> to EPA monitors over urban areas, which are dominated by anthropogenic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions, by matching grid cells exactly, we find that NO<sub>2</sub>  concentrations and NO<sub>2</sub> column density exhibit decreasing trends, which are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 % yr<sup>−1</sup> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 % yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. In contrast, wintertime NH<sub>3</sub> column densities have increased from 2007 to 2023 by 1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 % yr<sup>−1</sup> (Fig. 5b). The increase in NH<sub>3</sub> columns agree with increases in surface NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations reported by AMoN (8.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 % yr<sup>−1</sup>) (Fig. 5b) and prior studies (Wang et al., 2023b). Interestingly, NH<sub>3</sub> column densities significantly  increase by 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2014 to 2023, a stronger rate compared to the relatively flat trends from 2007 to 2013 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.2 % yr<sup>−1</sup>). This acceleration in NH<sub>3</sub> column density over the MWUS may be attributed to wintertime agricultural emissions (Vo and Christiansen, 2024; Wang et al., 2023b; Yu et al., 2018). Over the MWUS, fertilizer application contributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 62 % of total agricultural NH<sub>3</sub> emissions, and livestock waste contributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 % in 2020 (US EPA, 2020). The observed trends from both satellites and at the surface are consistent with PN sensitivity shifts toward the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-sensitive regime. This suggests that controlling wintertime NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions over the MWUS is a critical mitigation strategy for reducing wintertime PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Implications for particulate matter</title>
      <p id="d2e4766">Throughout the region, PN is the dominant wintertime component of the particle matrix. The average contributions of particle chemical components are 25.7 % for PN, 10.3 % for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and 19.5 % for OC over urban areas. The contribution of PN, SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OC to total PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations over rural areas are 32.3 %, 18.7 %, and 25.3 %, respectively (Fig. S16). Trends in observed PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PN also align with our findings regarding formation sensitivity. Observations from the IMPROVE network and CSN show decreases in wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2007 to 2023 over the MWUS (Fig. 6a). Prior to 2013, the decrease in PM<sub>2.5</sub> was stronger compared to the trends after 2013, during which time the trends in PM<sub>2.5</sub> started to level off (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2007 to 2013, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2014 to 2023). This similarity persists in PN mass concentrations. Overall, PN shows a decreasing trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.9 % yr<sup>−1</sup>. Prior to 2013, PN decreases by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9 % yr<sup>−1</sup>, while the decreases after 2013 slow to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3 % yr<sup>−1</sup>. These results suggest that PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> trends are mostly driven by changes in NO<sub>2</sub>, especially after 2013, when NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations increase strongly and NO<sub>2</sub> remains relatively constant (Fig. 6b). These trends are consistent across urban and rural sites (Fig. S13). Our model simulations also suggest that overall PM<sub>2.5</sub> formation sensitivity is becoming more sensitive to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions (Fig. 7), similar to our findings for PN (Fig. 2).</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e5061">Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the relative changes of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (red) and PN (blue) since 2007 over the MWUS using IMPROVE and CSN ground monitoring observations. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the wintertime trends in NO<sub>2</sub> (red) and NH<sub>3</sub> (blue) concentrations over the MWUS using AMoN and EPA ground monitoring observations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e5105">The percentage difference in PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations between the Base simulations and Reduced-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> simulations (red), Base simulations and Reduced-NH<sub>3</sub> simulations (blue), and Base simulations and Reduced-VOC simulations (green). The solid lines represent sensitivity simulations using the NEI2016 emissions inventory. The dashed lines and points represent sensitivity simulations using the CEDS emissions inventory.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9493/2026/acp-26-9493-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5142">The prominence of PN in the particle matrix, the similarity of PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> trends, and the increasing sensitivity of both PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions all suggest that PN may be critical for determining wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden and trends over the MWUS (Fig. S17). Hence, reducing PN would be most effective for reducing PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden over the MWUS during winter. The most impactful timeframe for controlling wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> via NH<sub>3</sub> reduction in the MWUS may have already passed. Prior to the mid-2010s, regulating NH<sub>3</sub> emissions during wintertime would have decreased PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations more effectively over the MWUS compared to reducing NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions, as reported in many studies starting in the mid-2000s (Gu et al., 2021; Makar et al., 2009; Pinder et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2022). This is consistent with our findings prior to 2010, in which the changes in PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden are more sensitive to changes in NH<sub>3</sub> emissions in almost half the region. However, during this time period, regulations focused on NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> emissions, increasing formation sensitivity to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> as emissions continued to decrease. After the late 2000s, reducing NH<sub>3</sub> emissions has become increasingly less effective in controlling wintertime PN and thus PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden. The percentage difference in wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations between the Base and Reduced-NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> simulations gradually increases by 0.31 % yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2007 to 2022 (2.2 % in 2007, 6.6 % in 2022), while it decreases by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.33 % yr<sup>−1</sup> in the Reduced-NH<sub>3</sub> simulation (7.5 % in 2007, 2.7 % in 2022). This is consistent with the shifts in wintertime PN sensitivity. These trends are captured using both NEI2016 and CEDS emissions inventories (Fig. 7). Our findings are also consistent with more recent studies. In 2015, it was estimated that effective mitigation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the MWUS may require anthropogenic NH<sub>3</sub> emissions cuts of 60 %–90 % (Guo et al., 2024). This requirement will have only become harder to achieve since then. Similarly, Pan et al. (2024) suggested that regulating NH<sub>3</sub> is becoming less effective as secondary inorganic aerosols have become less sensitive to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and reductions in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of 40 %–70 % would be needed to reduce annual secondary inorganic aerosols over the rural United States (Pan et al., 2024). Holt et al. (2015) found that the sensitivity of wintertime inorganic PM<sub>2.5</sub> shifted toward NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions from 2005 to 2012, especially over the northern Midwest (Holt et al., 2015). Currently and in the future, NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions reductions are likely the most effective way to control wintertime PN formation and PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden in the MWUS.</p>
      <p id="d2e5448">It should be noted that, while PN is most sensitive to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> in the winter, reducing NH<sub>3</sub> emissions can still decrease PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden with significant benefits within this season. Over the MWUS, despite having the lowest agricultural NH<sub>3</sub> emissions compared to other seasons, a reduction of 0.01 Tg NH<sub>3</sub> could decrease PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden up to 3.7 % during wintertime, suggesting that reducing agricultural NH<sub>3</sub> emissions may still have significant impacts over agricultural regions (Vo and Christiansen, 2024). Controlling NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions will become increasingly costly, but agricultural NH<sub>3</sub> emissions may be able to be targeted at a lower cost (Gu et al., 2021; Makar et al., 2009; Muller and Mendelsohn, 2007; Pinder et al., 2007). In addition, controlling local NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> production may become less effective for mitigating air quality concerns as regional sources (e.g., lightning, soils) become dominant contributors to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions and trends. Careful consideration of technological advancements and economic concerns will be needed for new regulations aimed at reducing PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden over agricultural regions. This study was only focused on wintertime PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden, and sensitivity conditions in other seasons may differ, as both NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and NH<sub>3</sub> emissions show distinct seasonal patterns. This is an area for future investigation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e5597">Our study shows that wintertime PN formation is becoming more sensitive to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions over the MWUS from 2007 to 2023. This is consistent with the relatively flat trends in satellite NO<sub>2</sub> column densities (0.48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.60 % yr<sup>−1</sup>) and the continuous increases in satellite NH<sub>3</sub> column densities (1.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 % yr<sup>−1</sup>) from 2007 to 2023 over MWUS. VOCs do not influence the formation of PN over the MWUS. Our results indicate that it is most chemically effective to control NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions to reduce wintertime PN and PM<sub>2.5</sub> burden. The MWUS might have missed the most impactful window to control wintertime PM<sub>2.5</sub> by reducing NH<sub>3</sub> emissions. Future work to diagnose PN formation sensitivity over the MWUS across other seasons is needed to understand whether controlling NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions is effective year-round. This work provides a chemical perspective for policymakers interested in effective emissions controls to improve air quality and human health over agriculturally intensive regions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5718">Data and R code used in this publication are available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19638364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19638364</ext-link> (Vo, 2026a).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="videosupplement"><title>Video supplement</title>

      <p id="d2e5727">Movies S1–S4 are available at:  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20669721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20669721</ext-link> (Vo, 2026b)</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5733">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9493-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9493-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5742">AC designed and directed the projects. TV performed the research, compiled and analyzed the data, conducted model simulations, and prepared the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5748">The contact author has declared that neither of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5754">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5760">We would like to acknowledge Krotkov et al. (2019) for publicly available NO<sub>2</sub> column densities and Clarisse and Coheur (2018a, b) for NH<sub>3</sub> column densities. The computational for this work was performed on the high-performance computing infrastructure operated by Research Support Solutions in the Division of IT at the University of Missouri, Columbia MO on the Hellbender cluster (DOI: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.32469/10355/97710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.32469/10355/97710</ext-link>). We thank the National Atmospheric Deposition Program for providing open-access data for gaseous NH<sub>3</sub> concentrations and nitrate wet deposition over the United States. We also acknowledge the United States Environmental Agency for publicly available surface NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations, PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations and particle chemical speciation data over urban areas. We also acknowledge the Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments (IMRPOVE) for the public availability of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass concentrations and particle chemical speciation data over rural areas. Lastly, we thank Daniel Jacob for the development and public availability of GEOS-Chem.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5823">This paper was edited by Yves Balkanski and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN): <uri>https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/networks/ammonia-monitoring-network/</uri>, National Atmospheric Deposition Program, last access: 1 November 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Vinken, G. C. M., and Eskes, H. J.: Representativeness errors in comparing chemistry transport and chemistry climate models with satellite UV–Vis tropospheric column retrievals, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 875–898, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Cao, Y., Ma, Q., Chu, B., and He, H.: Homogeneous and heterogeneous photolysis of nitrate in the atmosphere: state of the science, current research needs, and future prospects, Frontiers of Environmental Science &amp; Engineering, 17, 1–18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1648-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11783-023-1648-6</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Christiansen, A., Mickley, L. J., and Hu, L.: Constraining long-term NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions over the United States and Europe using nitrate wet deposition monitoring networks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4569–4589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4569-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-4569-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Christiansen, A. E., Carlton, A. G., and Porter, W. C.: Changing Nature of Organic Carbon over the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 10524–10532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02225" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c02225</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L. and Coheur, P.-F.: Reanalyzed daily IASI/Metop-A ULB-LATMOS ammonia (NH3) L2 product (total column), Aeris [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/12" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/12</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L. and Coheur, P.-F.: Reanalyzed daily IASI/Metop-B ULB-LATMOS ammonia (NH3) L2 product (total column), Aeris [data set],  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.25326/13" ext-link-type="DOI">10.25326/13</ext-link>, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Clerbaux, C., Boynard, A., Clarisse, L., George, M., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Herbin, H., Hurtmans, D., Pommier, M., Razavi, A., Turquety, S., Wespes, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Monitoring of atmospheric composition using the thermal infrared IASI/MetOp sounder, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6041–6054, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Curci, G., Ferrero, L., Tuccella, P., Barnaba, F., Angelini, F., Bolzacchini, E., Carbone, C., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Facchini, M. C., Gobbi, G. P., Kuenen, J. P. P., Landi, T. C., Perrino, C., Perrone, M. G., Sangiorgi, G., and Stocchi, P.: How much is particulate matter near the ground influenced by upper-level processes within and above the PBL? A summertime case study in Milan (Italy) evidences the distinctive role of nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2629–2649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2629-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2629-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., Shah, V., Eastham, S. D., Fritz, T. M., Mickley, L. J., Liu, T., Wang, Y., and Wang, J.: Background nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) over the United States and its implications for satellite observations and trends: effects of nitrate photolysis, aircraft, and open fires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6271–6284, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6271-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-6271-2023</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., Zhai, S., Coheur, P., Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Pendergrass, D. C., Choi, J., Park, J., Liu, Z., and Liao, H.: Diagnosing the Sensitivity of Particulate Nitrate to Precursor Emissions Using Satellite Observations of Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105761" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL105761</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., Zhai, S., Yang, L. H., Pendergrass, D. C., Coheur, P., Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Choi, J., Park, J., Liu, Z., Xie, P., and Liao, H.: A Satellite-Based Indicator for Diagnosing Particulate Nitrate Sensitivity to Precursor Emissions: Application to East Asia, Europe, and North America, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 20101–20113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08082" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.4c08082</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Darmenov, A. S. and da Silva, A. M.: The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED): Documentation of Versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4: Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation – Volume 38, edited by: Koster, R. D., NASA, <uri>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180005253</uri> (last access: 1 April 2026), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Demerjian, K. L.: A review of national monitoring networks in North America, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1861–1884, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00452-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00452-5</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Di, Q., Wang, Y., Zanobetti, A., Wang, Y., Koutrakis, P., Choirat, C., Dominici, F., and Schwartz, J. D.: Air Pollution and Mortality in the Medicare Population, New Engl. J. Med., 376, 2513–2522, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1056/NEJMoa1702747</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Fenn, M. E., Bytnerowicz, A., Schilling, S. L., Vallano, D. M., Zavaleta, E. S., Weiss, S. B., Morozumi, C., Geiser, L. H., and Hanks, K.: On-road emissions of ammonia: An underappreciated source of atmospheric nitrogen deposition, Sci. Total Environ., 625, 909–919, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.313" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.313</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fioletov, V., McLinden, C. A., Griffin, D., Krotkov, N., Liu, F., and Eskes, H.: Quantifying urban, industrial, and background changes in NO<sub>2</sub> during the COVID-19 lockdown period based on TROPOMI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4201–4236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4201-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-4201-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>; Ca<sup>2+</sup>; Mg<sup>2+</sup>; NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Na<sup>+</sup>; SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Cl<sup>−</sup>; H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Franchin, A., Fibiger, D. L., Goldberger, L., McDuffie, E. E., Moravek, A., Womack, C. C., Crosman, E. T., Docherty, K. S., Dube, W. P., Hoch, S. W., Lee, B. H., Long, R., Murphy, J. G., Thornton, J. A., Brown, S. S., Baasandorj, M., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Airborne and ground-based observations of ammonium-nitrate-dominated aerosols in a shallow boundary layer during intense winter pollution episodes in northern Utah, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17259–17276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17259-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17259-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs, L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan, K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A., Silva, A. M. da, Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D., Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M., Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gen, M., Liang, Z., Zhang, R., Go, B. R., and Chan, C. K.: Particulate nitrate photolysis in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 111–127, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00087J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D1EA00087J</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Gu, B., Zhang, L., Van Dingenen, R., Vieno, M., Van Grinsven, H. J., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., Wang, S., Ren, C., Rao, S., Holland, M., Winiwarter, W., Chen, D., Xu, J., and Sutton, M. A.: Abating ammonia is more cost-effective than nitrogen oxides for mitigating PM<sub>2.5</sub> air pollution, Science, 374, 758–762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf8623" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.abf8623</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Guo, H., Otjes, R., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Effectiveness of ammonia reduction on control of fine particle nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12241–12256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Y., Zhang, L., Winiwarter, W., Grinsven, H. J. M. van, Wang, X., Li, K., Pan, D., Liu, Z., and Gu, B.: Ambitious nitrogen abatement is required to mitigate future global PM<sub>2.5</sub> air pollution toward the World Health Organization targets, One Earth, 7, 1600–1613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.007</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Pitchford, M., Malm, W. C., and Frank, N. H.: Seasonal composition of remote and urban fine particulate matter in the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D05209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017122</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>He, T.-L., Jones, D. B. A., Miyazaki, K., Huang, B., Liu, Y., Jiang, Z., White, E. C., Worden, H. M., and Worden, J. R.: Deep Learning to Evaluate US NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> Emissions Using Surface Ozone Predictions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035597, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035597" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD035597</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Lee, T., Benedict, K. B., Schwandner, F. M., Li, Y., Clarisse, L., Hurtmans, D. R., Van Damme, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Philip, S., Martin, R. V., and Pye, H. O. T.: Atmospheric ammonia and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10295–10312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10295-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-10295-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Holt, J., Selin, N. E., and Solomon, S.: Changes in Inorganic Fine Particulate Matter Sensitivities to Precursors Due to Large-Scale US Emissions Reductions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4834–4841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00008</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Hu, L., Millet, D. B., Baasandorj, M., Griffis, T. J., Turner, P., Helmig, D., Curtis, A. J., and Hueber, J.: Isoprene emissions and impacts over an ecological transition region in the U.S. Upper Midwest inferred from tall tower measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 3553–3571, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022732" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022732</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Hudman, R. C., Moore, N. E., Mebust, A. K., Martin, R. V., Russell, A. R., Valin, L. C., and Cohen, R. C.: Steps towards a mechanistic model of global soil nitric oxide emissions: implementation and space based-constraints, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7779–7795, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7779-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-7779-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments:   IMPROVE Data [data set], <uri>https://views.cira.colostate.edu/fed/QueryWizard/</uri>, last access: 1 November 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Inventory Collaborative 2016v1 Emissions Modeling Platform: Specification Sheet: AG, <uri>https://views.cira.colostate.edu/wiki/Attachments/Inventory Collaborative/Documentation/2016v1/after_comments/National-Emissions-Collaborative_2016v1_nonpoint-ag_25Feb2020.pdf</uri> (last access: 12 March 2026), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Jefferson, A., Hageman, D., Morrow, H., Mei, F., and Watson, T.: Seven years of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth measurements from SGP: Factors influencing water uptake, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9451–9466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026804</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, Z., McDonald, B. C., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Miyazaki, K., Qu, Z., Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., Fischer, E. V., Zhu, L., and Boersma, K. F.: Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in the past decade, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5099–5104, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801191115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1801191115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Jiang, Z., Zhu, R., Miyazaki, K., McDonald, B. C., Klimont, Z., Zheng, B., Boersma, K. F., Zhang, Q., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., Denier van de Gon, H. A. C., and Eskes, H.: Decadal variabilities in tropospheric nitrogen oxides over United States, Europe, and China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035872, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD035872</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Keller, C. A., Long, M. S., Yantosca, R. M., Da Silva, A. M., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.: HEMCO v1.0: a versatile, ESMF-compliant component for calculating emissions in atmospheric models, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1409–1417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Krotkov, N. A., Lamsal, L. N., Marchenko, S. V., Bucsela, E. J., Swartz, W. H., Joiner, J., and the OMI Core Team: OMI/Aura Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Total and Tropospheric Column 1-orbit L2 Swath 13x24 km V003, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC) [data set], Greenbelt, MD, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2017</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Lamb, D. and Bowersox, V.: The national atmospheric deposition program: an overview, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1661–1663, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00425-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00425-2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lamsal, L. N., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Celarier, E. A., Bucsela, E.  J., Boersma, K. F., Dirksen, R., Luo, C., and Wang, Y.: Indirect validation of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide retrieved from the OMI satellite instrument: Insight into the seasonal variation of nitrogen oxides at northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013351</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Lamsal, L. N., Krotkov, N. A., Vasilkov, A., Marchenko, S., Qin, W., Yang, E.-S., Fasnacht, Z., Joiner, J., Choi, S., Haffner, D., Swartz, W. H., Fisher, B., and Bucsela, E.: Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Aura nitrogen dioxide standard product version 4.0 with improved surface and cloud treatments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 455–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-455-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-455-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Luo, G., Yu, F., and Moch, J. M.: Further improvement of wet process treatments in GEOS-Chem v12.6.0: impact on global distributions of aerosols and aerosol precursors, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2879–2903, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2879-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-2879-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Makar, P. A., Moran, M. D., Zheng, Q., Cousineau, S., Sassi, M., Duhamel, A., Besner, M., Davignon, D., Crevier, L.-P., and Bouchet, V. S.: Modelling the impacts of ammonia emissions reductions on North American air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7183–7212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7183-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-7183-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.: Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 1347–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD02916</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Muller, N. Z. and Mendelsohn, R.: Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States, J. Environmental Economics and Management, 54, 1–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.002</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>National Emissions Inventory Collaborative: 2016v1 Emissions Modeling Platform, <uri>http://views.cira.colostate.edu/wiki/wiki/10202</uri> (last access: 31 October 2025), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>National Trends Network: National Atmospheric Deposition Program, NTN Weekly Data [data set], <uri>https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/networks/national-trends-network/</uri>, last access: 1 November 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., Weber, R. J., and Russell, A.: Aerosol pH and liquid water content determine when particulate matter is sensitive to ammonia and nitrate availability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3249–3258, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3249-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-3249-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Norman, O. G., Heald, C. L., Bililign, S., Campuzano-Jost, P., Coe, H., Fiddler, M. N., Green, J. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, K., Liao, J., Middlebrook, A. M., Nault, B. A., Nowak, J. B., Schneider, J., and Welti, A.: Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 771–795, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-771-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Oak, Y. J., Jacob, D. J., Pendergrass, D. C., Dang, R., Colombi, N. K., Chong, H., Lee, S., Kuk, S. K., and Kim, J.: Air quality trends and regimes in South Korea inferred from 2015–2023 surface and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3233–3252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3233-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-3233-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Palmer, P. I., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., Martin, R. V., Spurr, R. J. D., Kurosu, T. P., Bey, I., Yantosca, R., Fiore, A., and Li, Q.: Air mass factor formulation for spectroscopic measurements from satellites: Application to formaldehyde retrievals from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 14539–14550, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900772" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900772</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Pan, D., Mauzerall, D. L., Wang, R., Guo, X., Puchalski, M., Guo, Y., Song, S., Tong, D., Sullivan, A. P., Schichtel, B. A., Collett, J. L., and Zondlo, M. A.: Regime shift in secondary inorganic aerosol formation and nitrogen deposition in the rural United States, Nat. Geosci., 17, 617–623, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01455-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-024-01455-9</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Paulot, F., Jacob, D. J., Pinder, R. W., Bash, J. O., Travis, K., and Henze, D. K.: Ammonia emissions in the United States, European Union, and China derived by high-resolution inversion of ammonium wet deposition data: Interpretation with a new agricultural emissions inventory (MASAGE_NH3), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4343–4364, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021130" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021130</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Paulot, F., Ginoux, P., Cooke, W. F., Donner, L. J., Fan, S., Lin, M.-Y., Mao, J., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Sensitivity of nitrate aerosols to ammonia emissions and to nitrate chemistry: implications for present and future nitrate optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1459–1477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Petetin, H., Sciare, J., Bressi, M., Gros, V., Rosso, A., Sanchez, O., Sarda-Estève, R., Petit, J.-E., and Beekmann, M.: Assessing the ammonium nitrate formation regime in the Paris megacity and its representation in the CHIMERE model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10419–10440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Pinder, R. W., Adams, P. J., and Pandis, S. N.: Ammonia Emission Controls as a Cost-Effective Strategy for Reducing Atmospheric Particulate Matter in the Eastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 380–386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060379a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es060379a</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Pitchford, M. L., Poirot ,Richard L., Schichtel ,Bret A., and and Malm, W. C.: Characterization of the Winter Midwestern Particulate Nitrate Bulge, J. Air Waste Ma., 59, 1061–1069, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1061</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Pokharel, A., Hennessy, D. A., and Wu, F.: Health burden associated with tillage-related PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution in the United States, and mitigation strategies, Sci. Total Environ., 903, 166161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166161" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166161</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Puchalski, M. A., Rogers, C. M., Baumgardner, R., Mishoe, K. P., Price, G., Smith, M. J., Watkins, N., and Lehmann, C. M.: A statistical comparison of active and passive ammonia measurements collected at Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) sites, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 17, 358–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00531G" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C4EM00531G</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Qin, C., Fu, X., Wang, T., Gao, J., and Wang, J.: Control of fine particulate nitrate during severe winter haze in “2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26” cities, J. Environ. Sci., 136, 261–269, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.12.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2022.12.016</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Romer Present, P. S., Zare, A., and Cohen, R. C.: The changing role of organic nitrates in the removal and transport of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 267–279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-267-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-267-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Sarwar, G., Hogrefe, C., Henderson, B. H., Mathur, R., Gilliam, R., Callaghan, A. B., Lee, J., and Carpenter, L. J.: Impact of particulate nitrate photolysis on air quality over the Northern Hemisphere, Sci. Total Environ., 917, 170406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170406</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Shah, V., Jacob, D. J., Dang, R., Lamsal, L. N., Strode, S. A., Steenrod, S. D., Boersma, K. F., Eastham, S. D., Fritz, T. M., Thompson, C., Peischl, J., Bourgeois, I., Pollack, I. B., Nault, B. A., Cohen, R. C., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Andersen, S. T., Carpenter, L. J., Sherwen, T., and Evans, M. J.: Nitrogen oxides in the free troposphere: implications for tropospheric oxidants and the interpretation of satellite NO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1227–1257, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Shi, L., Rosenberg, A., Wang, Y., Liu, P., Danesh Yazdi, M., Réquia, W., Steenland, K., Chang, H., Sarnat, J. A., Wang, W., Zhang, K., Zhao, J., and Schwartz, J.: Low-Concentration Air Pollution and Mortality in American Older Adults: A National Cohort Analysis (2001–2017), Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 7194–7202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03653" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c03653</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Shimadera, H., Hayami, H., Chatani, S., Morino, Y., Mori, Y., Morikawa, T., Yamaji, K., and Ohara, T.: Sensitivity analyses of factors influencing CMAQ performance for fine particulate nitrate, J. Air Waste Ma., 64, 374–387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.778919" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2013.778919</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Silvern, R. F., Jacob, D. J., Mickley, L. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Travis, K. R., Marais, E. A., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Choi, S., Joiner, J., and Lamsal, L. N.: Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns to infer long-term trends in US NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> background, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8863–8878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Simone, N. W., Stettler, M. E. J., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Rapid estimation of global civil aviation emissions with uncertainty quantification, Transport. Res. D-Tr. E., 25, 33–41, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.001</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Solomon, P. A., Crumpler, D., Flanagan, J. B., Jayanty, R. K. M., Rickman, E. E., and McDade, C. E.: U.S. National PM<sub>2.5</sub> Chemical Speciation Monitoring Networks – CSN and IMPROVE: Description of networks, J. Air Waste Ma., 64, 1410–1438, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.956904" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10962247.2014.956904</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Sun, K., Tao, L., Miller, D. J., Pan, D., Golston, L. M., Zondlo, M. A., Griffin, R. J., Wallace, H. W., Leong, Y. J., Yang, M. M., Zhang, Y., Mauzerall, D. L., and Zhu, T.: Vehicle Emissions as an Important Urban Ammonia Source in the United States and China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2472–2481, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02805" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b02805</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Tang, G., Wang, Y., Liu., Y., Wu, S., Huang, X., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Ma, J., Bao, X., Liu, Z., Ji, D., Li, T., Li, X., and Wang, Y.: Low particulate nitrate in the residual layer in autumn over the North China Plain, Sci. Total Environ., 782, 146845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146845" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146845</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Tessum, C. W., Apte, J. S., Goodkind, A. L., Muller, N. Z., Mullins, K. A., Paolella, D. A., Polasky, S., Springer, N. P., Thakrar, S. K., Marshall, J. D., and Hill, J. D.: Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 6001–6006, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818859116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1818859116</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Travis, K. R., Crawford, J. H., Chen, G., Jordan, C. E., Nault, B. A., Kim, H., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Dibb, J. E., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y., Zhai, S., Wang, X., McDuffie, E. E., Luo, G., Yu, F., Kim, S., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., Chang, L., and Kim, M. J.: Limitations in representation of physical processes prevent successful simulation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7933–7958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7933-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-7933-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Tong, D. Q., Lamsal, L., Pan, L., Ding, C., Kim, H., Lee, P., Chai, T., Pickering, K. E., and Stajner, I.: Long-term NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> trends over large cities in the United States during the great recession: Comparison of satellite retrievals, ground observations, and emission inventories, Atmos. Environ., 107, 70–84, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.035</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Ammonia Emissions: What to Know before You Regulate Official White Paper of USDA Agricultural Air Quality Task Force 2014, <uri>https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/AAQTF-AccomplishmentsAmmonia-White-Paper.pdf</uri> (last access: 31 October 2025), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): 2020 NEI Supporting Data and Summaries, <uri>https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2020-nei-supporting-data-and-summaries</uri> (last access: 1 April 2026), 2020 (updated 30 March 2023).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Pre-Generated Data Files, Daily Summary Data, US EPA, <uri>https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html#Daily</uri>, last access: 1 November 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Heald, C. L., Hurtmans, D., Ngadi, Y., Clerbaux, C., Dolman, A. J., Erisman, J. W., and Coheur, P. F.: Global distributions, time series and error characterization of atmospheric ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) from IASI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2905–2922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Van Damme, M., Whitburn, S., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.: Version 2 of the IASI NH<sub>3</sub> neural network retrieval algorithm: near-real-time and reanalysed datasets, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4905–4914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Franco, B., Sutton, M. A., Erisman, J. W., Wichink Kruit, R., van Zanten, M., Whitburn, S., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Global, regional and national trends of atmospheric ammonia derived from a decadal (2008–2018) satellite record, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 055017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Visser, A. J., Boersma, K. F., Ganzeveld, L. N., and Krol, M. C.: European NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> emissions in WRF-Chem derived from OMI: impacts on summertime surface ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11821–11841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11821-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11821-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Vo, T.: The Changing Sensitivity of Wintertime Particulate Nitrate to Precursor Emissions Diagnosed via GEOS-Chem and Satellite Observations of Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide over the Midwestern United States, Version v2, Zenodo [data set/code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19638364" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19638364</ext-link>, 2026a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Vo, T.: The Changing Sensitivity of Wintertime Particulate Nitrate to Precursor Emissions Diagnosed via GEOS-Chem and Satellite Observations of Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide over the Midwestern United States, Version v1, Zenodo [video], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20669721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20669721</ext-link>, 2026b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Vo, T. and Christiansen, A. E.: Impact of Recent Agricultural Ammonia Increases on Fine Particulate Matter Burden over the Midwestern United States, ACS Earth Space Chem., 8, 2209–2217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00180" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00180</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Walters, W. W., Karod, M., Willcocks, E., Baek, B. H., Blum, D. E., and Hastings, M. G.: Quantifying the importance of vehicle ammonia emissions in an urban area of northeastern USA utilizing nitrogen isotopes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13431–13448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Lu, K., Tan, Z., Chen, X., Liu, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Formation mechanism and control strategy for particulate nitrate in China, J. Environ. Sci., 123, 476–486, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.09.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2022.09.019</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Liu, X., Wu, C., and Lin, G.: Regional to global distributions, trends, and drivers of biogenic volatile organic compound emission from 2001 to 2020, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3309–3328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3309-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-3309-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Wang, R., Pan, D., Guo, X., Sun, K., Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Coheur, P.-F., Clerbaux, C., Puchalski, M., and Zondlo, M. A.: Bridging the spatial gaps of the Ammonia Monitoring Network using satellite ammonia measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13217–13234, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13217-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-13217-2023</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Ge, C., Castro Garcia, L., Jenerette, G. D., Oikawa, P. Y., and Wang, J.: Improved modelling of soil NOx emissions in a high temperature agricultural region: role of background emissions on NO<sub>2</sub> trend over the US, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 084061, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16a3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ac16a3</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. X., McElroy, M. B., Jacob, D. J., and Yantosca, R. M.: A nested grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: Applications to CO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005237" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005237</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Jing, B., Shi, X., Tong, S., Wang, W., and Ge, M.: Importance of water-soluble organic acid on the hygroscopicity of nitrate, Atmos. Environ., 190, 65–73, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.010</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>Warner, J. X., Dickerson, R. R., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Wang, Y., and Liang, Q.: Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world's major agricultural areas detected from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2875–2884, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL072305</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>Wen, L., Xue, L., Wang, X., Xu, C., Chen, T., Yang, L., Wang, T., Zhang, Q., and Wang, W.: Summertime fine particulate nitrate pollution in the North China Plain: increasing trends, formation mechanisms and implications for control policy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11261–11275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11261-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11261-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>Wiegand, R., Battye, W. H., Myers, C. B., and Aneja, V. P.: Particulate Matter and Ammonia Pollution in the Animal Agricultural-Producing Regions of North Carolina: Integrated Ground-Based Measurements and Satellite Analysis, Atmosphere, 13, 821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050821" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos13050821</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>Womack, C. C., McDuffie, E. E., Edwards, P. M., Bares, R., de Gouw, J. A., Docherty, K. S., Dubé, W. P., Fibiger, D. L., Franchin, A., Gilman, J. B., Goldberger, L., Lee, B. H., Lin, J. C., Long, R., Middlebrook, A. M., Millet, D. B., Moravek, A., Murphy, J. G., Quinn, P. K., Riedel, T. P., Roberts, J. M., Thornton, J. A., Valin, L. C., Veres, P. R., Whitehill, A. R., Wild, R. J., Warneke, C., Yuan, B., Baasandorj, M., and Brown, S. S.: An Odd Oxygen Framework for Wintertime Ammonium Nitrate Aerosol Pollution in Urban Areas: NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> and VOC Control as Mitigation Strategies, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4971–4979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL082028</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>Wu, L., Li, X., and Ro, C.-U.: Hygroscopic Behavior of Ammonium Sulfate, Ammonium Nitrate, and their Mixture Particles, Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment, 13, 196–211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2019.13.3.196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5572/ajae.2019.13.3.196</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>Wu, W., Jin, Y., and Carlsten, C.: Inflammatory health effects of indoor and outdoor particulate matter, J. Allergy Clin. Immun., 141, 833–844, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.981" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.981</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>Xiong, Y., Du, K., and Huang, Y.: One-third of global population at cancer risk due to elevated volatile organic compounds levels, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 54, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00598-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-024-00598-1</ext-link>, 2024. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Z., Liu, M., Zhang, M., Song, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, L., Xu, T., Wang, T., Yan, C., Zhou, T., Sun, Y., Pan, Y., Hu, M., Zheng, M., and Zhu, T.: High efficiency of livestock ammonia emission controls in alleviating particulate nitrate during a severe winter haze episode in northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5605–5613, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5605-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-5605-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y., Liu, L., Bai, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, F., Zhang, X., Liu, X., and Xie, Y.: Comprehensive quantification of global cropland ammonia emissions and potential abatement, Sci. Total Environ., 812, 151450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151450" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151450</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Y., Liu, L., Liu, P., Ding, J., Xu, H., and Liu, S.: Improved global agricultural crop- and animal-specific ammonia emissions during 1961–2018, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 344, 108289, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108289" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.agee.2022.108289</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>Yantosca, B., Sulprizio, M., Lundgren, L., kelvinhb, Eastham, S. D., Fritz, T., Lin, H., 22degrees, Ridley, D., Bindle, L., michael-s-long, tsherwen, Downs, W., Fisher, J., Holmes, C.,  Thackray, C., GanLuo, BettyCroft, Zhuang, J., Murray, L., SpaceMouse, Estrada, L. A., Shutter, J., noelleselin, nicholasbalasus, Long, M., xin-chen-github, Jourdan-He, Zhu, H., and emily-ramnarine: geoschem/geos-chem: GEOS-Chem 14.4.2 (14.4.2), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12807579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.12807579</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>Yu, F., Nair, A. A., and Luo, G.: Long-Term Trend of Gaseous Ammonia Over the United States: Modeling and Comparison With Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 8315–8325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028412" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018JD028412</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Wang, X., Liu, Z., Wen, T., Shah, V., Li, K., Moch, J. M., Bates, K. H., Song, S., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Luo, G., Yu, F., Sun, Y., Wang, L., Qi, M., Tao, J., Gui, K., Xu, H., Zhang, Q., Zhao, T., Wang, Y., Lee, H. C., Choi, H., and Liao, H.: Control of particulate nitrate air pollution in China, Nat. Geosci., 14, 389–395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00726-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-021-00726-z</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Pendergrass, D. C., Colombi, N. K., Shah, V., Yang, L. H., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Kim, H., Sun, Y., Choi, J.-S., Park, J.-S., Luo, G., Yu, F., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y., Dibb, J. E., Lee, T., Han, J.-S., Anderson, B. E., Li, K., and Liao, H.: Coarse particulate matter air quality in East Asia: implications for fine particulate nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4271–4281, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>The changing sensitivity of wintertime particulate nitrate to precursor emissions diagnosed via GEOS-Chem and satellite observations of ammonia and nitrogen dioxide over the Midwestern United States</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN): <a href="https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/networks/ammonia-monitoring-network/" target="_blank"/>, National Atmospheric Deposition Program, last access: 1 November 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boersma, K. F., Vinken, G. C. M., and Eskes, H. J.: Representativeness errors in comparing chemistry transport and chemistry climate models with satellite UV–Vis tropospheric column retrievals, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 875–898, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cao, Y., Ma, Q., Chu, B., and He, H.: Homogeneous and heterogeneous
photolysis of nitrate in the atmosphere: state of the science, current
research needs, and future prospects, Frontiers of Environmental Science
&amp; Engineering, 17, 1–18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1648-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-023-1648-6</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Christiansen, A., Mickley, L. J., and Hu, L.: Constraining long-term NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions over the United States and Europe using nitrate wet deposition monitoring networks, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4569–4589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4569-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4569-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Christiansen, A. E., Carlton, A. G., and Porter, W. C.: Changing Nature of
Organic Carbon over the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54,
10524–10532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02225" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02225</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarisse, L. and Coheur, P.-F.: Reanalyzed daily IASI/Metop-A
ULB-LATMOS ammonia (NH3) L2 product (total column), Aeris [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/12" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/12</a>, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarisse, L. and Coheur, P.-F.: Reanalyzed daily IASI/Metop-B ULB-LATMOS ammonia (NH3) L2 product (total column), Aeris [data set],  <a href="https://doi.org/10.25326/13" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.25326/13</a>, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clerbaux, C., Boynard, A., Clarisse, L., George, M., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Herbin, H., Hurtmans, D., Pommier, M., Razavi, A., Turquety, S., Wespes, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Monitoring of atmospheric composition using the thermal infrared IASI/MetOp sounder, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6041–6054, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6041-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Curci, G., Ferrero, L., Tuccella, P., Barnaba, F., Angelini, F., Bolzacchini, E., Carbone, C., Denier van der Gon, H. A. C., Facchini, M. C., Gobbi, G. P., Kuenen, J. P. P., Landi, T. C., Perrino, C., Perrone, M. G., Sangiorgi, G., and Stocchi, P.: How much is particulate matter near the ground influenced by upper-level processes within and above the PBL? A summertime case study in Milan (Italy) evidences the distinctive role of nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2629–2649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2629-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2629-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., Shah, V., Eastham, S. D., Fritz, T. M., Mickley, L. J., Liu, T., Wang, Y., and Wang, J.: Background nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) over the United States and its implications for satellite observations and trends: effects of nitrate photolysis, aircraft, and open fires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6271–6284, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6271-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6271-2023</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., Zhai, S., Coheur, P., Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M.,
Pendergrass, D. C., Choi, J., Park, J., Liu, Z., and Liao, H.: Diagnosing
the Sensitivity of Particulate Nitrate to Precursor Emissions Using
Satellite Observations of Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105761" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105761</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dang, R., Jacob, D. J., Zhai, S., Yang, L. H., Pendergrass, D. C., Coheur,
P., Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Choi, J., Park, J., Liu, Z., Xie, P., and
Liao, H.: A Satellite-Based Indicator for Diagnosing Particulate Nitrate
Sensitivity to Precursor Emissions: Application to East Asia, Europe, and
North America, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 20101–20113,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c08082</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Darmenov, A. S. and da Silva, A. M.: The Quick Fire Emissions Dataset (QFED): Documentation of Versions 2.1, 2.2 and 2.4: Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation – Volume 38, edited by: Koster, R. D., NASA, <a href="https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180005253" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 April 2026), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Demerjian, K. L.: A review of national monitoring networks in North America,
Atmos. Environ., 34, 1861–1884, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00452-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00452-5</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Di, Q., Wang, Y., Zanobetti, A., Wang, Y., Koutrakis, P., Choirat, C., Dominici, F., and Schwartz, J. D.: Air Pollution and Mortality in the Medicare Population, New Engl. J. Med., 376, 2513–2522, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702747</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fenn, M. E., Bytnerowicz, A., Schilling, S. L., Vallano, D. M., Zavaleta, E.
S., Weiss, S. B., Morozumi, C., Geiser, L. H., and Hanks, K.: On-road emissions of ammonia: An underappreciated source of atmospheric nitrogen deposition, Sci. Total Environ., 625, 909–919, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.313" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.313</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fioletov, V., McLinden, C. A., Griffin, D., Krotkov, N., Liu, F., and Eskes, H.: Quantifying urban, industrial, and background changes in NO<sub>2</sub> during the COVID-19 lockdown period based on TROPOMI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4201–4236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4201-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4201-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K<sup>+</sup>; Ca<sup>2+</sup>; Mg<sup>2+</sup>;
NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>; Na<sup>+</sup>; SO<sub>4</sub><sup>2−</sup>; NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>; Cl<sup>−</sup>;
H<sub>2</sub>O aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4639–4659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4639-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Franchin, A., Fibiger, D. L., Goldberger, L., McDuffie, E. E., Moravek, A., Womack, C. C., Crosman, E. T., Docherty, K. S., Dube, W. P., Hoch, S. W., Lee, B. H., Long, R., Murphy, J. G., Thornton, J. A., Brown, S. S., Baasandorj, M., and Middlebrook, A. M.: Airborne and ground-based observations of ammonium-nitrate-dominated aerosols in a shallow boundary layer during intense winter pollution episodes in northern Utah, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17259–17276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17259-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17259-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gelaro, R., McCarty, W., Suárez, M. J., Todling, R., Molod, A., Takacs,
L., Randles, C. A., Darmenov, A., Bosilovich, M. G., Reichle, R., Wargan,
K., Coy, L., Cullather, R., Draper, C., Akella, S., Buchard, V., Conaty, A.,
Silva, A. M. da, Gu, W., Kim, G.-K., Koster, R., Lucchesi, R., Merkova, D.,
Nielsen, J. E., Partyka, G., Pawson, S., Putman, W., Rienecker, M.,
Schubert, S. D., Sienkiewicz, M., and Zhao, B.: The Modern-Era Retrospective
Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), J. Climate, 30, 5419–5454, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gen, M., Liang, Z., Zhang, R., Go, B. R., and Chan, C. K.: Particulate
nitrate photolysis in the atmosphere, Environ. Sci.: Atmos., 2, 111–127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00087J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EA00087J</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gu, B., Zhang, L., Van Dingenen, R., Vieno, M., Van Grinsven, H. J., Zhang,
X., Zhang, S., Chen, Y., Wang, S., Ren, C., Rao, S., Holland, M., Winiwarter, W., Chen, D., Xu, J., and Sutton, M. A.: Abating ammonia is more cost-effective than nitrogen oxides for mitigating PM<sub>2.5</sub> air pollution,
Science, 374, 758–762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf8623" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf8623</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guenther, A. B., Jiang, X., Heald, C. L., Sakulyanontvittaya, T., Duhl, T., Emmons, L. K., and Wang, X.: The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): an extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 1471–1492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-1471-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, H., Otjes, R., Schlag, P., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: Effectiveness of ammonia reduction on control of fine particle nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12241–12256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12241-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, Y., Zhang, L., Winiwarter, W., Grinsven, H. J. M. van, Wang, X., Li,
K., Pan, D., Liu, Z., and Gu, B.: Ambitious nitrogen abatement is required
to mitigate future global PM<sub>2.5</sub> air pollution toward the World Health
Organization targets, One Earth, 7, 1600–1613,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2024.08.007</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Pitchford, M., Malm, W. C., and Frank, N. H.:
Seasonal composition of remote and urban fine particulate matter in the
United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D05209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017122</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, T.-L., Jones, D. B. A., Miyazaki, K., Huang, B., Liu, Y., Jiang, Z., White, E. C., Worden, H. M., and Worden, J. R.: Deep Learning to Evaluate US
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> Emissions Using Surface Ozone Predictions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035597, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035597" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035597</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Heald, C. L., Collett Jr., J. L., Lee, T., Benedict, K. B., Schwandner, F. M., Li, Y., Clarisse, L., Hurtmans, D. R., Van Damme, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P.-F., Philip, S., Martin, R. V., and Pye, H. O. T.: Atmospheric ammonia and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10295–10312, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10295-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10295-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hoesly, R. M., Smith, S. J., Feng, L., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pitkanen, T., Seibert, J. J., Vu, L., Andres, R. J., Bolt, R. M., Bond, T. C., Dawidowski, L., Kholod, N., Kurokawa, J.-I., Li, M., Liu, L., Lu, Z., Moura, M. C. P., O'Rourke, P. R., and Zhang, Q.: Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 369–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-369-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holt, J., Selin, N. E., and Solomon, S.: Changes in Inorganic Fine Particulate Matter Sensitivities to Precursors Due to Large-Scale US Emissions Reductions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 4834–4841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00008</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, L., Millet, D. B., Baasandorj, M., Griffis, T. J., Turner, P., Helmig,
D., Curtis, A. J., and Hueber, J.: Isoprene emissions and impacts over an
ecological transition region in the U.S. Upper Midwest inferred from tall
tower measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 3553–3571, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022732" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022732</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hudman, R. C., Moore, N. E., Mebust, A. K., Martin, R. V., Russell, A. R., Valin, L. C., and Cohen, R. C.: Steps towards a mechanistic model of global soil nitric oxide emissions: implementation and space based-constraints, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 7779–7795, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7779-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-7779-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Interagency Monitoring of PROtected Visual Environments:   IMPROVE Data [data set],
<a href="https://views.cira.colostate.edu/fed/QueryWizard/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 November 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Inventory Collaborative 2016v1 Emissions Modeling Platform: Specification Sheet: AG, <a href="https://views.cira.colostate.edu/wiki/Attachments/Inventory Collaborative/Documentation/2016v1/after_comments/National-Emissions-Collaborative_2016v1_nonpoint-ag_25Feb2020.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 March 2026), 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jefferson, A., Hageman, D., Morrow, H., Mei, F., and Watson, T.: Seven years
of aerosol scattering hygroscopic growth measurements from SGP: Factors
influencing water uptake, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 9451–9466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026804</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, Z., McDonald, B. C., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Miyazaki, K., Qu, Z.,
Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., Fischer, E. V., Zhu, L., and
Boersma, K. F.: Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in
the past decade, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5099–5104, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801191115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801191115</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jiang, Z., Zhu, R., Miyazaki, K., McDonald, B. C., Klimont, Z., Zheng, B., Boersma, K. F., Zhang, Q., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., Denier van de Gon, H. A. C., and Eskes, H.: Decadal variabilities in tropospheric nitrogen oxides over United States, Europe, and China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035872, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035872" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035872</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keller, C. A., Long, M. S., Yantosca, R. M., Da Silva, A. M., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.: HEMCO v1.0: a versatile, ESMF-compliant component for calculating emissions in atmospheric models, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1409–1417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krotkov, N. A., Lamsal, L. N., Marchenko, S. V., Bucsela, E. J., Swartz, W. H., Joiner, J., and the OMI Core Team: OMI/Aura Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
Total and Tropospheric Column 1-orbit L2 Swath 13x24 km V003, Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC)
[data set], Greenbelt, MD, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/OMI/DATA2017</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lamb, D. and Bowersox, V.: The national atmospheric deposition program: an
overview, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1661–1663, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00425-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00425-2</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lamsal, L. N., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Celarier, E. A., Bucsela, E.  J., Boersma, K. F., Dirksen, R., Luo, C., and Wang, Y.: Indirect validation of tropospheric nitrogen dioxide retrieved from the OMI satellite instrument: Insight into the seasonal variation of nitrogen oxides at northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013351</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lamsal, L. N., Krotkov, N. A., Vasilkov, A., Marchenko, S., Qin, W., Yang, E.-S., Fasnacht, Z., Joiner, J., Choi, S., Haffner, D., Swartz, W. H., Fisher, B., and Bucsela, E.: Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Aura nitrogen dioxide standard product version 4.0 with improved surface and cloud treatments, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 455–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-455-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-455-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luo, G., Yu, F., and Moch, J. M.: Further improvement of wet process treatments in GEOS-Chem v12.6.0: impact on global distributions of aerosols and aerosol precursors, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 2879–2903, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2879-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-2879-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Makar, P. A., Moran, M. D., Zheng, Q., Cousineau, S., Sassi, M., Duhamel, A., Besner, M., Davignon, D., Crevier, L.-P., and Bouchet, V. S.: Modelling the impacts of ammonia emissions reductions on North American air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7183–7212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7183-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7183-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Malm, W. C., Sisler, J. F., Huffman, D., Eldred, R. A., and Cahill, T. A.:
Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction
in the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 99, 1347–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD02916</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Muller, N. Z. and Mendelsohn, R.: Measuring the damages of air pollution in
the United States, J. Environmental Economics and Management, 54,
1–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2006.12.002</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Emissions Inventory Collaborative: 2016v1 Emissions Modeling Platform, <a href="http://views.cira.colostate.edu/wiki/wiki/10202" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 October 2025), 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
National Trends Network: National Atmospheric Deposition Program, NTN Weekly Data [data set],
<a href="https://nadp.slh.wisc.edu/networks/national-trends-network/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 November 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., Weber, R. J., and Russell, A.: Aerosol pH and liquid water content determine when particulate matter is sensitive to ammonia and nitrate availability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3249–3258, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3249-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3249-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Norman, O. G., Heald, C. L., Bililign, S., Campuzano-Jost, P., Coe, H., Fiddler, M. N., Green, J. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, K., Liao, J., Middlebrook, A. M., Nault, B. A., Nowak, J. B., Schneider, J., and Welti, A.: Exploring the processes controlling secondary inorganic aerosol: evaluating the global GEOS-Chem simulation using a suite of aircraft campaigns, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 771–795, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-771-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oak, Y. J., Jacob, D. J., Pendergrass, D. C., Dang, R., Colombi, N. K., Chong, H., Lee, S., Kuk, S. K., and Kim, J.: Air quality trends and regimes in South Korea inferred from 2015–2023 surface and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3233–3252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3233-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3233-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Palmer, P. I., Jacob, D. J., Chance, K., Martin, R. V., Spurr, R. J. D.,
Kurosu, T. P., Bey, I., Yantosca, R., Fiore, A., and Li, Q.: Air mass factor
formulation for spectroscopic measurements from satellites: Application to
formaldehyde retrievals from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 14539–14550, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900772" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900772</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pan, D., Mauzerall, D. L., Wang, R., Guo, X., Puchalski, M., Guo, Y., Song,
S., Tong, D., Sullivan, A. P., Schichtel, B. A., Collett, J. L., and Zondlo,
M. A.: Regime shift in secondary inorganic aerosol formation and nitrogen
deposition in the rural United States, Nat. Geosci., 17, 617–623,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01455-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01455-9</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paulot, F., Jacob, D. J., Pinder, R. W., Bash, J. O., Travis, K., and Henze,
D. K.: Ammonia emissions in the United States, European Union, and China
derived by high-resolution inversion of ammonium wet deposition data:
Interpretation with a new agricultural emissions inventory (MASAGE_NH3), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 4343–4364, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021130" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021130</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paulot, F., Ginoux, P., Cooke, W. F., Donner, L. J., Fan, S., Lin, M.-Y., Mao, J., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Sensitivity of nitrate aerosols to ammonia emissions and to nitrate chemistry: implications for present and future nitrate optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1459–1477, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petetin, H., Sciare, J., Bressi, M., Gros, V., Rosso, A., Sanchez, O., Sarda-Estève, R., Petit, J.-E., and Beekmann, M.: Assessing the ammonium nitrate formation regime in the Paris megacity and its representation in the CHIMERE model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10419–10440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10419-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pinder, R. W., Adams, P. J., and Pandis, S. N.: Ammonia Emission Controls as
a Cost-Effective Strategy for Reducing Atmospheric Particulate Matter in the
Eastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 380–386,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es060379a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es060379a</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pitchford, M. L., Poirot ,Richard L., Schichtel ,Bret A., and and Malm, W.
C.: Characterization of the Winter Midwestern Particulate Nitrate Bulge,
J. Air Waste Ma., 59, 1061–1069, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.59.9.1061</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pokharel, A., Hennessy, D. A., and Wu, F.: Health burden associated with
tillage-related PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution in the United States, and mitigation
strategies, Sci. Total Environ., 903, 166161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166161" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166161</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Puchalski, M. A., Rogers, C. M., Baumgardner, R., Mishoe, K. P., Price, G.,
Smith, M. J., Watkins, N., and Lehmann, C. M.: A statistical comparison of
active and passive ammonia measurements collected at Clean Air Status and
Trends Network (CASTNET) sites, Environ. Sci.: Processes Impacts, 17,
358–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00531G" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00531G</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Qin, C., Fu, X., Wang, T., Gao, J., and Wang, J.: Control of fine
particulate nitrate during severe winter haze in “2+26” cities, J. Environ. Sci., 136, 261–269, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.12.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.12.016</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Romer Present, P. S., Zare, A., and Cohen, R. C.: The changing role of organic nitrates in the removal and transport of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 267–279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-267-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-267-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sarwar, G., Hogrefe, C., Henderson, B. H., Mathur, R., Gilliam, R.,
Callaghan, A. B., Lee, J., and Carpenter, L. J.: Impact of particulate
nitrate photolysis on air quality over the Northern Hemisphere, Sci. Total Environ., 917, 170406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170406" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170406</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shah, V., Jacob, D. J., Dang, R., Lamsal, L. N., Strode, S. A., Steenrod, S. D., Boersma, K. F., Eastham, S. D., Fritz, T. M., Thompson, C., Peischl, J., Bourgeois, I., Pollack, I. B., Nault, B. A., Cohen, R. C., Campuzano-Jost, P., Jimenez, J. L., Andersen, S. T., Carpenter, L. J., Sherwen, T., and Evans, M. J.: Nitrogen oxides in the free troposphere: implications for tropospheric oxidants and the interpretation of satellite NO2 measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1227–1257, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1227-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shi, L., Rosenberg, A., Wang, Y., Liu, P., Danesh Yazdi, M., Réquia, W.,
Steenland, K., Chang, H., Sarnat, J. A., Wang, W., Zhang, K., Zhao, J., and
Schwartz, J.: Low-Concentration Air Pollution and Mortality in American Older Adults: A National Cohort Analysis (2001–2017), Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 7194–7202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03653" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c03653</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shimadera, H., Hayami, H., Chatani, S., Morino, Y., Mori, Y., Morikawa, T.,
Yamaji, K., and Ohara, T.: Sensitivity analyses of factors influencing CMAQ
performance for fine particulate nitrate, J. Air Waste Ma., 64, 374–387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.778919" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.778919</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Silvern, R. F., Jacob, D. J., Mickley, L. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Travis, K. R., Marais, E. A., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Choi, S., Joiner, J., and Lamsal, L. N.: Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns to infer long-term trends in US NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> background, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8863–8878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Simone, N. W., Stettler, M. E. J., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Rapid estimation
of global civil aviation emissions with uncertainty quantification, Transport. Res. D-Tr. E., 25, 33–41, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.001</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Solomon, P. A., Crumpler, D., Flanagan, J. B., Jayanty, R. K. M., Rickman,
E. E., and McDade, C. E.: U.S. National PM<sub>2.5</sub> Chemical Speciation Monitoring Networks – CSN and IMPROVE: Description of networks, J. Air Waste Ma., 64, 1410–1438, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.956904" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2014.956904</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, K., Tao, L., Miller, D. J., Pan, D., Golston, L. M., Zondlo, M. A.,
Griffin, R. J., Wallace, H. W., Leong, Y. J., Yang, M. M., Zhang, Y.,
Mauzerall, D. L., and Zhu, T.: Vehicle Emissions as an Important Urban
Ammonia Source in the United States and China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2472–2481, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02805" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02805</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tang, G., Wang, Y., Liu., Y., Wu, S., Huang, X., Yang, Y., Wang, Y., Ma, J.,
Bao, X., Liu, Z., Ji, D., Li, T., Li, X., and Wang, Y.: Low particulate nitrate in the residual layer in autumn over the North China Plain, Sci. Total Environ., 782, 146845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146845" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146845</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tessum, C. W., Apte, J. S., Goodkind, A. L., Muller, N. Z., Mullins, K. A.,
Paolella, D. A., Polasky, S., Springer, N. P., Thakrar, S. K., Marshall, J.
D., and Hill, J. D.: Inequity in consumption of goods and services adds to
racial–ethnic disparities in air pollution exposure, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 116, 6001–6006, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818859116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818859116</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Travis, K. R., Crawford, J. H., Chen, G., Jordan, C. E., Nault, B. A., Kim, H., Jimenez, J. L., Campuzano-Jost, P., Dibb, J. E., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y., Zhai, S., Wang, X., McDuffie, E. E., Luo, G., Yu, F., Kim, S., Simpson, I. J., Blake, D. R., Chang, L., and Kim, M. J.: Limitations in representation of physical processes prevent successful simulation of PM<sub>2.5</sub> during KORUS-AQ, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7933–7958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7933-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7933-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tong, D. Q., Lamsal, L., Pan, L., Ding, C., Kim, H., Lee, P., Chai, T.,
Pickering, K. E., and Stajner, I.: Long-term NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> trends over large cities in the United States during the great recession: Comparison of satellite
retrievals, ground observations, and emission inventories, Atmos. Environ., 107, 70–84, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.035</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Ammonia Emissions: What to Know before You Regulate Official White Paper of USDA Agricultural Air Quality Task Force 2014, <a href="https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/2022-10/AAQTF-AccomplishmentsAmmonia-White-Paper.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 31 October 2025), 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): 2020 NEI Supporting
Data and Summaries, <a href="https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2020-nei-supporting-data-and-summaries" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 April 2026), 2020 (updated 30 March 2023).

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): Pre-Generated Data Files, Daily Summary Data, US EPA, <a href="https://aqs.epa.gov/aqsweb/airdata/download_files.html#Daily" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 November 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Heald, C. L., Hurtmans, D., Ngadi, Y., Clerbaux, C., Dolman, A. J., Erisman, J. W., and Coheur, P. F.: Global distributions, time series and error characterization of atmospheric ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) from IASI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2905–2922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Damme, M., Whitburn, S., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.: Version 2 of the IASI NH<sub>3</sub> neural network retrieval algorithm: near-real-time and reanalysed datasets, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4905–4914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Franco, B., Sutton, M. A., Erisman, J. W.,
Wichink Kruit, R., van Zanten, M., Whitburn, S., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans,
D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Global, regional and national trends of
atmospheric ammonia derived from a decadal (2008–2018) satellite record,
Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 055017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Visser, A. J., Boersma, K. F., Ganzeveld, L. N., and Krol, M. C.: European NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions in WRF-Chem derived from OMI: impacts on summertime surface ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11821–11841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11821-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11821-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vo, T.: The Changing Sensitivity of Wintertime Particulate Nitrate to Precursor Emissions Diagnosed via GEOS-Chem and Satellite Observations of Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide over the Midwestern United States, Version v2, Zenodo [data set/code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19638364" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19638364</a>, 2026a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vo, T.: The Changing Sensitivity of Wintertime Particulate Nitrate to Precursor Emissions Diagnosed via GEOS-Chem and Satellite Observations of Ammonia and Nitrogen Dioxide over the Midwestern United States, Version v1, Zenodo [video], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20669721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20669721</a>, 2026b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vo, T. and Christiansen, A. E.: Impact of Recent Agricultural Ammonia
Increases on Fine Particulate Matter Burden over the Midwestern United
States, ACS Earth Space Chem., 8, 2209–2217,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00180" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.4c00180</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Walters, W. W., Karod, M., Willcocks, E., Baek, B. H., Blum, D. E., and Hastings, M. G.: Quantifying the importance of vehicle ammonia emissions in an urban area of northeastern USA utilizing nitrogen isotopes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13431–13448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13431-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Lu, K., Tan, Z., Chen, X., Liu, Y., and Zhang, Y.: Formation
mechanism and control strategy for particulate nitrate in China, J. Environ. Sci., 123, 476–486, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.09.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2022.09.019</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, H., Liu, X., Wu, C., and Lin, G.: Regional to global distributions, trends, and drivers of biogenic volatile organic compound emission from 2001 to 2020, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3309–3328, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3309-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3309-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, R., Pan, D., Guo, X., Sun, K., Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Coheur, P.-F., Clerbaux, C., Puchalski, M., and Zondlo, M. A.: Bridging the spatial gaps of the Ammonia Monitoring Network using satellite ammonia measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13217–13234, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13217-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13217-2023</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y., Ge, C., Castro Garcia, L., Jenerette, G. D., Oikawa, P. Y., and
Wang, J.: Improved modelling of soil NOx emissions in a high temperature
agricultural region: role of background emissions on NO<sub>2</sub> trend over the US,
Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 084061, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16a3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac16a3</a>,
2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y. X., McElroy, M. B., Jacob, D. J., and Yantosca, R. M.: A nested
grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: Applications to CO,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005237" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005237</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Z., Jing, B., Shi, X., Tong, S., Wang, W., and Ge, M.: Importance of
water-soluble organic acid on the hygroscopicity of nitrate, Atmos. Environ., 190, 65–73, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.010</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
      
Warner, J. X., Dickerson, R. R., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Wang, Y., and Liang,
Q.: Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world's major agricultural areas
detected from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2875–2884,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072305</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wen, L., Xue, L., Wang, X., Xu, C., Chen, T., Yang, L., Wang, T., Zhang, Q., and Wang, W.: Summertime fine particulate nitrate pollution in the North China Plain: increasing trends, formation mechanisms and implications for control policy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11261–11275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11261-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11261-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wiegand, R., Battye, W. H., Myers, C. B., and Aneja, V. P.: Particulate
Matter and Ammonia Pollution in the Animal Agricultural-Producing Regions of
North Carolina: Integrated Ground-Based Measurements and Satellite Analysis,
Atmosphere, 13, 821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050821" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13050821</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
      
Womack, C. C., McDuffie, E. E., Edwards, P. M., Bares, R., de Gouw, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Dubé, W. P., Fibiger, D. L., Franchin, A., Gilman, J.
B., Goldberger, L., Lee, B. H., Lin, J. C., Long, R., Middlebrook, A. M.,
Millet, D. B., Moravek, A., Murphy, J. G., Quinn, P. K., Riedel, T. P.,
Roberts, J. M., Thornton, J. A., Valin, L. C., Veres, P. R., Whitehill, A.
R., Wild, R. J., Warneke, C., Yuan, B., Baasandorj, M., and Brown, S. S.: An
Odd Oxygen Framework for Wintertime Ammonium Nitrate Aerosol Pollution in
Urban Areas: NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and VOC Control as Mitigation Strategies, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 46, 4971–4979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082028</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, L., Li, X., and Ro, C.-U.: Hygroscopic Behavior of Ammonium Sulfate,
Ammonium Nitrate, and their Mixture Particles, Asian Journal of Atmospheric
Environment, 13, 196–211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2019.13.3.196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2019.13.3.196</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, W., Jin, Y., and Carlsten, C.: Inflammatory health effects of indoor and
outdoor particulate matter, J. Allergy Clin. Immun., 141, 833–844, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.981" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.12.981</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xiong, Y., Du, K., and Huang, Y.: One-third of global population at cancer
risk due to elevated volatile organic compounds levels, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 7, 54, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00598-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00598-1</a>, 2024.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, Z., Liu, M., Zhang, M., Song, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, L., Xu, T., Wang, T., Yan, C., Zhou, T., Sun, Y., Pan, Y., Hu, M., Zheng, M., and Zhu, T.: High efficiency of livestock ammonia emission controls in alleviating particulate nitrate during a severe winter haze episode in northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 5605–5613, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5605-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-5605-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y., Liu, L., Bai, Z., Xu, W., Zhang, F., Zhang, X., Liu, X., and Xie,
Y.: Comprehensive quantification of global cropland ammonia emissions and
potential abatement, Sci. Total Environ., 812, 151450,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151450" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151450</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, Y., Liu, L., Liu, P., Ding, J., Xu, H., and Liu, S.: Improved global
agricultural crop- and animal-specific ammonia emissions during 1961–2018,
Agr. Ecosyst. Environ., 344, 108289, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108289" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108289</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yantosca, B., Sulprizio, M., Lundgren, L., kelvinhb, Eastham, S. D., Fritz, T., Lin, H., 22degrees, Ridley, D., Bindle, L., michael-s-long, tsherwen, Downs, W., Fisher, J., Holmes, C.,  Thackray, C., GanLuo, BettyCroft, Zhuang, J., Murray, L., SpaceMouse, Estrada, L. A., Shutter, J., noelleselin, nicholasbalasus, Long, M., xin-chen-github, Jourdan-He, Zhu, H., and emily-ramnarine: geoschem/geos-chem: GEOS-Chem 14.4.2 (14.4.2), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12807579" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12807579</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, F., Nair, A. A., and Luo, G.: Long-Term Trend of Gaseous Ammonia Over
the United States: Modeling and Comparison With Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 8315–8325, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028412" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD028412</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Wang, X., Liu, Z., Wen, T., Shah, V., Li, K., Moch,
J. M., Bates, K. H., Song, S., Shen, L., Zhang, Y., Luo, G., Yu, F., Sun,
Y., Wang, L., Qi, M., Tao, J., Gui, K., Xu, H., Zhang, Q., Zhao, T., Wang,
Y., Lee, H. C., Choi, H., and Liao, H.: Control of particulate nitrate air
pollution in China, Nat. Geosci., 14, 389–395,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00726-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00726-z</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhai, S., Jacob, D. J., Pendergrass, D. C., Colombi, N. K., Shah, V., Yang, L. H., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Kim, H., Sun, Y., Choi, J.-S., Park, J.-S., Luo, G., Yu, F., Woo, J.-H., Kim, Y., Dibb, J. E., Lee, T., Han, J.-S., Anderson, B. E., Li, K., and Liao, H.: Coarse particulate matter air quality in East Asia: implications for fine particulate nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 4271–4281, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4271-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
