<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-9277-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Gas-phase degradation of the aroma compound ethyl butyrate and its methylated derivatives: UV-C photolysis and reactions with the hydroxyl radical</article-title><alt-title>Gas-phase degradation of the aroma compound ethyl butyrate and its methylated derivatives</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Löher</surname><given-names>Finja</given-names></name>
          <email>finja.loeher@york.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7685-5203</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Blitz</surname><given-names>Mark A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6710-4021</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Seakins</surname><given-names>Paul W.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4335-8593</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Carslaw</surname><given-names>Nicola</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dillon</surname><given-names>Terry J.</given-names></name>
          <email>terry.dillon@york.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8974-9410</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Wolfson Atmospheric Chemistry Laboratories, Department of Chemistry, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Environment and Geography, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Finja Löher (finja.loeher@york.ac.uk) and Terry J. Dillon (terry.dillon@york.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>13</issue>
      <fpage>9277</fpage><lpage>9293</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Finja Löher et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e142">The aroma compound ethyl butyrate (EB) and its methylated derivatives ethyl 2-methylbutyrate (EM), ethyl isovalerate (EI), and isopropyl butyrate (IB) are present in many consumer products. To evaluate the environmental and health impacts of these volatile organic compounds, a detailed understanding of their gas-phase photochemical reactivity is required. Here, we performed pulsed laser photolysis/laser-induced fluorescence (PLP-LIF) experiments to investigate the kinetics of their reactions with the hydroxyl radical (OH). Room temperature rate coefficients in units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical errors were determined as: (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for EB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for EM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for EI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH, and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for IB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH. All four reactions exhibited complex kinetics with distinct non-Arrhenius behaviour for temperatures up to about 400 K. This behaviour was attributed to pre-reaction complexes and is consistent with site-specific reactivities as predicted by an established structure-activity-relationship (SAR). In a second series of experiments, quasi-gas-phase UV-vis. spectroscopy and time-dependent density functional theory predictions were used to obtain absorption cross-sections. All four esters displayed an absorption band at around 213 nm (spin-forbidden <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition), but did not absorb appreciably in the visible or UV-A part of the spectrum where light is abundant at ground level. Therefore, the reaction with OH was considered the main loss process, with lifetimes for tropospheric removal ranging from 22–45 h. Photochemical ozone creation potentials were estimated to be in a moderate range between 28 and 34.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Natural Environment Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>NE/S007458/1</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e297">Ethyl butyrate (ethyl butanoate; henceforth EB) and its methylated derivatives ethyl 2-methylbutyrate (ethyl 2-methylbutanoate; EM), ethyl isovalerate (ethyl 3-methylbutanoate; EI), and isopropyl butyrate (propan-2-yl butanoate; IB) are a group of volatile compounds with widespread occurrence and versatile applications but largely unknown gas-phase behaviour. Their structures are shown in Fig. 1. In industrial contexts, EB and its derivatives have been explored as promising second-generation biofuels that could support the transition away from petroleum-based fuels (Badawy et al., 2016; El-Nahas et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2021). Furthermore, fatty acid esters with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acid chains are potent solvents (Knothe and Steidley, 2011) that can be synthesised from bio-derived alcohols and acids and may therefore be sourced sustainably at large scales (Xu et al., 2020).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e324">Molecular structures of EB and its derivatives with numbered H abstraction sites. The areas of the circles are proportional to the room temperature partial rate coefficients for the reaction with OH at each site, as predicted by the structure-activity relationship (SAR) by Jenkin et al.  (2018). The absolute and relative values of these rate coefficients are listed in Table S5 in the Supplement.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e333">Importantly, EB and its derivatives are also present in many consumer products. They occur naturally in many plants and food products (Bicas et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2013; Sosa-Moguel et al., 2018), and can enhance sweetness perception and are thus used as sugar substitutes in food and as active ingredients in e-cigarettes (Barba et al., 2018; Labbe et al., 2007; Rao et al., 2018; Xiao et al., 2023, 2024). Moreover, EB and its derivatives exhibit the distinct fruity odour typical of many esters, and they fall into the range of molecules with a particular strong aroma, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aliphatic compounds with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acyl moiety and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alkoxy group (Boelens et al., 1983; Kraft et al., 2000). With a smell reminiscent of pineapple, apple, or pear, they are a popular additive for a range of household items and consumer products. For instance, this includes their use in room fragrance products or scented personal care products (Nematollahi et al., 2018; Uhde and Schulz, 2015), but also in cleaning products such as washing-up liquids (Fig. S1 with Table S1 for methodological details, both in the Supplement). They are also described in perfumery reference libraries and supplier catalogues, as well as in fragrances databases where they are listed as active ingredients in cosmetics and perfume (e.g. The Good Scents Company Information System, 2026).</p>
      <p id="d2e395">As aroma compounds need to reach the human olfactory system to induce scent, they are volatile to some degree and can be classified as volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This is also true for EB and its derivatives, which exhibit vapour pressures in the range of approx. 11–19 mbar at room temperature (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2026). Therefore, they exist mainly in the gas phase after emission, where they are exposed to different sources of light and atmospheric oxidants. Critically, consumer products are mostly used indoors, meaning that the components of the formulations are emitted into confined spaces. The presence of these VOCs in indoor environments can have numerous effects on ambient air quality, including direct toxicity as well as the formation of harmful secondary pollutants after photooxidation (Weschler and Carslaw, 2018; Wolkoff et al., 1997). Inadequate ventilation can slow the dilution of emitted VOCs and their photochemical products, leading to accumulation of these compounds indoors. Since most people spend the vast majority of their time indoors (Klepeis et al., 2001), the cumulative exposure to critical pollutants can represent a substantial health concern. Equally, indoor-outdoor exchange can lead to the occurrence of VOCs emitted from consumer products outdoors (Yeoman et al., 2020), where photooxidation conditions can be different. For both indoor and outdoor air quality, it is therefore important to characterize the photochemical reactivity of emitted compounds.</p>
      <p id="d2e398">Since EB and its derivatives do not possess C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>C double bonds, rapid ozonolysis or reactions that proceed via the addition of a radical to the molecular structure can be disregarded. Loss processes that can be relevant, on the other hand, include photolysis or radical-initiated H abstraction.  For photolytic decay to occur, a chromophore must be present, which in case of esters is the carbonyl group (Lary and Shallcross, 2000). The typical carbonyl transitions tend to be blue-shifted for esters due to the additional alkoxy oxygen, but the exact position and magnitude of the absorption bands depend very much on the specific substituents and molecular structure (Caswell et al., 1976; Closson and Haug, 1964). For EB and its derivatives in particular, the UV-vis. absorption spectra or photolysis quantum yields have not yet been determined to the best of our knowledge, meaning that the relevance of photolytic decay is still poorly constrained.</p>
      <p id="d2e408">Oxidation via abstraction of an H-atom can be initiated by reactive free radicals such as OH or Cl (Calvert et al., 2011; Mellouki et al., 2003). Cl atoms are scarce in the troposphere (Wang et al., 2019), yet their reactions are often significantly faster than the equivalent OH radical reactions (Liang et al., 2010; Notario et al., 1998). The room temperature rate coefficients are known for most of the compounds studied here and have been reported for EB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl (Cometto et al., 2009; Ifang et al., 2015; Ramya and Rajakumar, 2019), EM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl (Ifang et al., 2015), and EI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl (Ifang et al., 2015). In contrast, OH radicals are more abundant in the troposphere and are considered the dominant oxidant outdoors (Lelieveld et al., 2004) while also playing an important role indoors (Weschler and Carslaw, 2018).  OH is generally known to react with esters (e.g. Ferrari et al., 1996; Wallington et al., 1988; Williams et al., 1993), which makes it a likely reaction partner for EB and its derivatives as shown in Reactions (R1)–(R4). 

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered reaction"><mml:math id="M23" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EB</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>products</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EM</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>products</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EI</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>products</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.R4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>R4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IB</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>products</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        However, rate coefficients have only been reported for EB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (Cometto et al., 2009; Ferrari et al., 1996; Gour et al., 2014; Wallington et al., 1988) and remain unknown for the methylated EB derivatives. While structure-activity-relationships (SARs) are available to predict VOC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>OH rate coefficients (Jenkin et al., 2018; Kwok and Atkinson, 1995), these are often limited in their capability to accurately describe oxygenated compounds (e.g. Mapelli et al., 2022, 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e555">Given the lack of available kinetic data, this study aims to assess the gas-phase atmospheric fate and potential air quality impacts of EB and its derivatives by evaluating their photochemical reactivities and atmospheric lifetimes. To this end, we performed experiments to determine UV–vis.  absorption spectra as well as temperature-dependent rate coefficients for reactions with OH radicals (R1–R4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental</title>
      <p id="d2e566">The photochemical properties of EB and its derivatives were explored by experimental and computational approaches for the determination of absorption cross-sections (Sect. 2.1), as well as by pulsed laser photolysis (PLP)/laser induced fluorescence (LIF) experiments conducted at the University of York and the University of Leeds to investigate radical kinetics (Sect. 2.2). In a preliminary study to this work, EB and its derivatives were identified from headspace samples of washing up liquid (see Sect. S1 in the Supplement for details). The organics were purchased as neat compounds from Fisher Scientific (EB, EM, EI), Scientific Laboratory Supplies (IB), and Sigma Aldrich (ethyl acetate), all with a stated purity of at least <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>UV-vis. absorption spectra</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>Quasi-gas-phase spectroscopy</title>
      <p id="d2e596">As direct gas-phase measurements were not feasible with the available instrumentation, the UV-vis. absorption properties of EB and its derivatives were probed experimentally by recording solution-phase spectra, dilute in cyclohexane (D'Souza Metcalf et al., 2025). As demonstrated by Nakashima et al. (1982), the difference in absorption intensity between solution-phase and gas-phase spectra is smallest when the selected solvent has low molecular polarizability and the dispersion forces between the target compound and solvent are minimized. In such cases, solution-phase spectra can be considered “quasi-gas-phase”. Cyclohexane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a non-polar solvent with low polarizability. As such, it has been used in previous studies to record UV-vis. spectra of oxygenated compounds and has been shown to be a suitable choice when a small correction factor for the absorption intensity is applied (D'Souza Metcalf et al., 2025; Mapelli et al., 2023). Furthermore, cyclohexane absorbs mainly below 200 nm and in particular below 180 nm (Doner et al., 2019), and therefore does not interfere with the expected absorption maxima of carbonyl-containing VOCs.  To validate the method and to determine a suitable correction factor for this class of compounds, a quasi-gas-phase spectrum of ethyl acetate (ethyl ethanoate; EA) was recorded along with the spectra of EB and its derivatives. EA is structurally and chemically similar to EB and its derivatives, and its UV absorption in the gas phase is well-established (McMillan, 1966; Śmialek et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e615">Each compound was dissolved in cyclohexane to obtain dilute solutions in the range of 0.004–0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Working with these low concentrations, interactions of the target compound molecules amongst each other were minimized. The solutions were prepared using micropipettes and volumetric flasks to an estimated accuracy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All spectra were recorded with a resolution of 0.2 nm in the range between 200–600 nm (EB) or 200–350 nm (EA, EM, EI, IB) using a pair of quartz cuvettes (pathlength 1 cm) in a UV-vis.  spectrometer (UV-2600, Shimadzu). Solvent-vs-solvent baselines were recorded to account for differences in the optical properties of the cuvettes, and were subtracted from all spectra.</p>
      <p id="d2e639">To obtain the gas-phase absorption cross-section, we first derived the extinction coefficient according to the Beer Lambert law shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>): 

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absorbance recorded by the spectrometer (unitless), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference beam intensity (a.u.), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sample beam intensity (a.u.), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration in M, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the pathlength in cm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molar extinction coefficient in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A linear regression of the absorbance against concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pathlength was performed for each wavelength interval, resulting in a robust estimate of the extinction coefficient (see also Fig. S2 in the Supplement). In the next step, the extinction coefficient was converted to the gas-phase absorption cross-section using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E6"/>), based on the relationship between Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) and the Beer Lambert law for gas-phase conditions as shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M39" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas-phase absorption cross-section in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is Avogadro's constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.022</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gas-phase absorption (unitless), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the concentration in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>Computational experiments</title>
      <p id="d2e1068">In addition to the spectroscopic experiments, UV-vis. spectra were predicted computationally using Gaussian 16, revision C.02 (Frisch et al., 2016). In a first step, the molecular geometries were optimised to find the most stable structures, using the B3LYP functional with a 6-311++G(d,p) basis set and gd3bj dispersion correction. Tight convergence criteria were employed for higher accuracy. The fully converged stationary points were verified as true energy minima by vibrational frequency analysis. Imaginary frequencies, which would reveal saddle points on the potential energy surface, were absent in all cases. Using the optimised structures, vertical excitation energies for the lowest 30 singlet states were obtained by time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) calculations at the at the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. For evaluating UV-vis.  absorption in solution, both the geometry optimisation and the energy calculation were performed with inclusion of cyclohexane as the solvent (CPCM method). For all computational steps, our choice of functionals and basis sets was aligned with the configurations used in similar applications (e.g. Anhaia-Machado et al., 2023; Pandey et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2024).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>PLP-LIF experiments</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>2.2.1</label><title>Experimental setup at University of York</title>
      <p id="d2e1087">Most PLP-LIF experiments were performed at the University of York, using the apparatus described in detail by Mapelli et al. (2022). Briefly, the flows of the target VOC, the OH precursor, and the bath gas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99.9999</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, obtained directly as boil-off from liquid <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were each regulated by mass flow controllers (MFCs), and mixed in a glass manifold before entering the 400 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spherical Pyrex reaction cell. The laser beams entered the cell through quartz Brewster windows, and additional arms were available for the introduction of the gas mix and the vacuum pump. The temperature inside the reaction cell was regulated with electric heating tape, maintained with glass fibre insulation, and monitored with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-type thermocouple that could be moved along a vertical gradient and was placed in the centre of the cell before and after each experiment. Two capacitance manometers (MKS, 10 and 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were available to monitor the pressure in the reaction cell. The experiments were performed at pressures between 20 and 37 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a total flow of a few hundred sccm, resulting in approx. 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sccm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1177">OH radicals were generated through the photolysis of gaseous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Reaction (R5), which can be regarded as a clean source of OH radicals. 

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.R8" content-type="numbered reaction"><label>R5</label><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mo>⟶</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mover><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            As a source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixture of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-urea (97 %, Sigma Aldrich) and sand (pure, 40-100 mesh, Fisher Scientific) was placed in a glass container that was heated to approx. 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a water bath. At this temperature, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-urea decomposes and provides water-free <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vapour. The sand was added to prevent agglomeration. This method has been used in numerous previous studies (e.g.  Chen et al., 2024; Hong et al., 2010; Ludwig et al., 2006). To photolyze <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fourth harmonic output from a Nd:YAG laser (Quantel, Q-Smart) was used to provide a 266 nm laser beam with 10 Hz frequency and a fluence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1355">OH radicals were detected via off-resonant LIF, with excitation at 282 nm via the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Π</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition. The 282 nm laser beam was supplied from a frequency-doubled dye laser (Radiant Dyes, NarrowScan) that was pumped at 532 nm from the second harmonic output of a Nd:YAG laser (Continuum, Surelite II) and tuned for a Rhodamine-6G emission at 564 nm. The 309 nm fluorescence of OH radicals was collected perpendicular to the laser beams by biconvex lenses and directed through an interference filter onto a photomultiplier tube (PMT, Hamamatsu).</p>
      <p id="d2e1404">The organics were degassed by repeated freeze-pump-thaw cycles and room temperature degassing. To enable a steady supply of the gaseous compounds in the PLP-LIF experiments, they were diluted and stored in 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Pyrex bulbs (mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the pressure of the organic in the bulb remaining below the room temperature vapour pressure).  Except for the experiments without added ester, all experiments were carried out under <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ester</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions to enable the analysis of the OH decay as a pseudo-first-order reaction. The removal rate of OH radicals in the absence of any organic (see intercept in Fig. 3) suggested a concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the reaction cell. To obtain a decay profile of OH, the timing between the PLP laser and the LIF laser was successively increased.  The entire trace was recorded several times and averaged to reduce noise. A LabVIEW programme was used to control the lasers via a delay generator (BNC, 575) and to collect and digitalise the LIF data via an oscilloscope (Picoscope, 5000).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>2.2.2</label><title>Experimental setup at University of Leeds</title>
      <p id="d2e1516">Additional PLP-LIF experiments for EB were carried out at the University of Leeds in order to evaluate rate coefficients at higher temperatures, to compare OH and OD radical kinetics for further mechanistic insights, and to probe for OH recycling. The experimental set-up is generally similar to the one described above, with comparable pressures and total flows. Significant differences are noted as follows: the reaction cell was constructed from stainless steel, argon was used as the bath gas, and on-resonant LIF was employed (see below). For further technical specifications, the reader is referred to previous publications (e.g. Blitz et al., 2025; Onel et al., 2012) where the apparatus has been described in detail.</p>
      <p id="d2e1519">As for the York PLP-LIF experiments, OH radicals were generated from the photolysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 266 nm, using the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-urea precursor to introduce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The OH probe beam at approx. 308 nm was created by doubling a 616 nm tuneable dye laser output (dye: DCM special with pyridine 1). For experiments including OD radicals, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was either added to a wet peroxide source (50 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), or flown over the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-urea precursor in an enriched carrier gas flow, forming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> almost instantly in both cases. The amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was adjusted so that a sufficient amount of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was converted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The photolysis of the gaseous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixture yielded both OH and OD radicals. The kinetics of these radicals with EB were probed in the same reaction cell in immediate succession. To alternate between OH and OD radical lines, the dye laser wavelength was adjusted slightly in between runs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d2e1738">The relevance of photolytic degradation of EB and its derivatives in different settings was evaluated based on the gas-phase absorption cross-sections in Sect. 3.1. In terms of radical reactions, the rate coefficients of each of the esters with OH are detailed as a function of temperature in Sect. 3.2, and these results are put in the context of SAR predictions of site-specific reactivities and probable abstraction mechanisms. Complementary material is provided in Sects. S2 and S3 in the Supplement, respectively.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>UV absorption cross-sections and rates of photolysis</title>
      <p id="d2e1748">For method validation and refinement, we compared the experimentally determined solution-phase spectrum (200–350 nm) for EA from this work to available gas-phase spectra from the literature and to gas-phase and solution-phase TD-DFT predictions. For details of this proof-of-concept study, the reader is referred to Sect. S2.1 with Fig. S2 and Table S2 in the Supplement. Importantly, the experimental solution-phase spectrum showed excellent agreement with the literature gas-phase spectra in terms of the peak position and peak shape, but the magnitude of the absorption was amplified due to solvent effects. A robust correction factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which aligns well with previous studies (Mapelli et al., 2023; Nakashima et al., 1982) was derived from the observed differences in peak areas. We conclude that the experimental solution-phase spectra for EB and its derivatives can provide an accurate proxy for gas-phase behaviour when this correction factor is applied.</p>
      <p id="d2e1763">The UV absorption spectra of EB and its derivatives are displayed in Fig. 2a. The absorption maxima and corresponding wavelengths for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption bands of the individual compounds are listed in Table S3 in the Supplement. The absorption band at around 213 nm is attributable to the forbidden <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition. A weak absorption band at around 210 nm is a typical feature of many esters and results from the interaction of the lone pair of electrons of the alkoxy oxygen with the carbonyl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> orbitals and the associated blue-shift of the carbonyl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition (Closson and Haug, 1964 and references therein). In terms of intensity, the molar extinction coefficients of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (experimental data) are comparable to the values reported for other esters at around 210 nm, which are generally small and remain mostly in the range below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a result of the low likelihood with which the forbidden <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition occurs (Caswell et al., 1976; Closson and Haug, 1964). There was no absorption in the visible range (Fig. S3 in the Supplement). In the gas-phase spectra predicted by TD-DFT, the peaks appear slightly blue-shifted but agree within 4 nm with the experimental data. Additionally, the peak profiles are a bit narrower, which was previously observed for EA as well (Fig. S2 in the Supplement). The predicted maximum absorption intensities are between 1.3 and 2.8 times lower than the experimental values, suggesting that the computational approach used in this work provides a qualitative rather than quantitative description of the studied compounds.</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1864">UV absorption and potential for photolytic decay for EB and its derivatives. <bold>(a)</bold> UV-vis. spectra of EB, EM, EI, and IB, recorded as dilute solution-phase spectra (0.004–0.016 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in cyclohexane, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> excl. blanks, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical errors as shaded areas) and corrected to gas-phase conditions using the scaling factor 0.86. TD-DFT predications are shown as dotted lines (CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory; 30 singlet states). <bold>(b)</bold> Solar actinic flux at 51° N latitude in peak summer at altitudes of 0, 5, 7, and 10 km (sea level towards upper troposphere) according to the NCAR TUV model v5.3. The wavelengths of different UV-C germicidal lamps are shown as vertical arrows. <bold>(c)</bold> Product of the EB absorption cross-section, the photon flux at 10 km altitude, and an assumed quantum yield of 1, resulting in the upper limit photolysis rate after integration, shown for the experimental data and the TD-DFT predictions of the absorption cross-section. The wavelength corresponding to the estimated bond dissociation energy (BDE; 422 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 283 nm) for the single C–O bond in the ester group is shown as the dashed vertical arrow.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1931">Peak positions for the methyl-substituted derivatives appear slightly red-shifted, by approx. 1–2 nm when compared to EB. There is a trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for both the experimental data and the TD-DFT predictions, even though <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is slightly smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the TD-DFT predictions. The observed red-shift of the methylated derivatives is in accordance with the work by Closson and Haug (1964) who have observed that the absorption maximum tends to be shifted to longer wavelengths when a methyl group is attached to either the carbon adjacent to the carbonyl functional group or to the carbon adjacent to the alkoxy oxygen. Here, this is valid for EM and IB, respectively. The red-shift resulting from methyl substitution in the acyl group is likely to result from the electron-donating effect of the methyl group and the resulting increase in energy of the lone pair electrons of the oxygen, thus reducing the energy difference in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition (Closson and Haug, 1964). The red-shift caused by methyl substitution in the alkoxy group, in turn, is believed to be related to steric effects and the interaction between the methyl group and the carbonyl oxygen, either directly increasing the energy of the lone pair electrons, or lowering <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by reducing coplanarity or increasing the C–O–C bond angle (Closson and Haug, 1964).</p>
      <p id="d2e2038">For the methylated esters, the absorption intensity tends to increase along with the red-shift, suggesting that similar mechanisms may contribute to both effects. Indeed, Caswell et al. (1976) found that the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in their study were dependent on the availability of electron-donating alkyl group. In both the experimental data and the TD-DFT predictions, EM has a distinctly higher cross-section than the other three compounds which in turn are relatively similar in their absorption intensities. The factor by which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EB,EI,IB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1.4 in the experimental data and 2.5 in the TD-DFT predictions. This suggests that the electron-donating effect of the methyl group is strongest in EM, which can be rationalised by its immediate proximity to the carbonyl carbon.</p>
      <p id="d2e2085">Photolysis only becomes a competitive atmospheric loss process if the incoming radiation aligns with the absorption bands of EB and its derivatives and if it contains sufficient energy to break intra-molecular bonds. The scission of the ester functional group (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RC</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OR</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RCO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OR</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) has been shown to be the most relevant photolysis pathway for esters exposed to unfiltered light, accounting for at least half of the observed photolysis products of esters such as methyl propionate or methyl butyrate close to room temperature (Ausloos, 1958). The bond dissociation energy (BDE) for the scission of the bond between the carbonyl carbon and the alkoxy oxygen has been calculated to be 420 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for ethyl propanoate and 424 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for methyl butanoate (El-Nahas et al., 2007). Assuming an average 422 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for EB and its derivatives, the wavelength corresponding to this estimated BDE is 283 nm (Fig. 2c). This essentially means that radiation with longer wavelengths will be ineffective in photolyzing the molecules even if they did absorb in the near-UV or visible range, whereas wavelengths shorter than that would be able to break the bond. Within their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption band, photolysis is hence principally possible. At <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of EB and its derivatives of around 213 nm, the photon energy is roughly 561 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and far above the estimated BDE.</p>
      <p id="d2e2216">However, under standard ground-level conditions outdoors or in conventional indoor environments, there is effectively no radiation in the UV-C range where EB and its derivatives absorb. Light sources used to irradiate living spaces are designed to emit in the visible range, and sunlight reaching the Earth's surfaces contains mainly radiation with wavelengths above 300 nm since most of the UV-B and UV-C radiation is absorbed by optically active gases within the atmosphere. At around 200–220 nm, however, there is less attenuation and UV-C light can penetrate further through the atmosphere. As a result, there is a height-dependent photon flux and a higher availability of UV-C radiation – and hence a higher likelihood for photolysis – in the upper troposphere and stratosphere than at ground level (Fig. 2b).</p>
      <p id="d2e2219">For relevant spectral ranges, photolysis rates can be calculated as the product of the photon flux, the absorption cross-section of the molecule, and the photolysis quantum yield, integrated over the relevant wavelength range as shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>): 

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M113" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the first-order photolysis rate in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength-dependent quantum yield, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength- dependent absorption cross-section in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength-dependent photon flux in quanta <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not known for EB (or any of its derivatives), in common with many other VOCs, a value needs to be assumed for the calculation of photolysis rates. Since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the EB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption band and the spectral range of the atmospheric window in the UV-C range are far below the threshold wavelength corresponding to the estimated BDE and since the incoming energy is hence significantly higher than the energy needed to break the bond (Fig. 2c), a quantum yield of 1 is principally possible. Using an assumed quantum yield of 1 in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) results in the photon absorption rate, which is an upper limit to the photolysis rate. Here, we calculated these rates for EB using the recorded UV-vis.  absorption spectrum and the actinic fluxes as predicted by the Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible (TUV) model v5.3 (NCAR, 2025) for altitudes of 0, 5, 7, and 10 km at 51° N latitude in peak summer. The upper limit photolysis rate of EB increases by numerous orders of magnitude from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between sea level (0 km altitude) and the upper troposphere (10 km altitude), but the corresponding (minimum) photolytic lifetime is in the range of millennia for all altitudes (Table 1). Notably, the experimental UV spectra from this work are only available down to 200 nm, but absorption still occurs below that wavelength. However, evaluating the photon absorption rate based on the TD-DFT prediction (which has a smaller absorption cross-section by about a factor of 2, explaining the absolute difference in the photon absorption rate) reveals that the product of the absorption cross-section and the photon flux quickly declines below 200 nm even for a height of 10 km (Fig. 2c). This is mainly due to the sharp decrease of the photon flux (note the logarithmic scale in Fig. 2b).</p>

<table-wrap id="T1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2487">Upper limit photolysis rate of EB throughout the troposphere, calculated using the flux predicted by the NCAR TUV model v5.3 for peak summer and 51° N latitude. The lifetime is given by the reciprocal of the photolysis rate.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Altitude/km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2711">In spite of the insignificance of photolysis in most settings, the absorption of EB and its derivatives in the UV-C range can still be relevant in specific experimental and environmental contexts. In terms of kinetic work, the absorption of the esters below 260 nm can be associated with additional scatter or bias in PLP-LIF experiments if VUV light sources or – to a lesser extent – 248 nm excimer lasers are used, whereas no interference is expected from 266 nm lasers such as were employed in this work. Beyond such technical considerations, the absorption of EB and its derivatives could be relevant in the context of germicidal UV-C technology.  UV-C lamps which emit at 254 or 222 nm have sterilising properties (Naito et al., 2022), and have seen a surge in interest and usage since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. For 222 nm lamps in particular, the emitted light overlaps substantially with the absorption band of EB and its derivatives (Fig. 2b). As such, they may induce photolytic degradation of EB and its derivatives in indoor environments where they may be employed next to VOC sources. While the potential impact of UV-C lamps on indoor air quality has been recognised increasingly in recent years, most studies were limited to observations of ozone formation (e.g. Link et al., 2023; Peng et al., 2023) rather than investigations of direct VOC photolysis. Given the high spectral significance not only for EB and its derivatives but for many oxygenated or conjugated VOCs absorbing in the UV-C range, direct photolysis may be an underestimated phenomenon in indoor air chemistry that should be investigated in more detail.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Kinetics of OH with EB and its derivatives</title>
      <p id="d2e2722">For each PLP-LIF experiment, the pseudo first order OH decay rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined for a range of different VOC concentrations.  All experiments were conducted with the VOC in excess, so that the OH decay could be evaluated according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M136" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the OH signals at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and time 0 respectively (a.u.), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the pseudo first order rate coefficient in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the time in s. The rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could then be derived as the slope of the linear regression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against the VOC concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VOC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown exemplarily in Fig. 3 and as described by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>).  The intercept of the linear regression represents <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>loss</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which is the loss term for other losses of OH in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and which was dominated here by the Reaction (R6) between OH radicals and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> quoted throughout this work are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical errors only, unless specifically stated otherwise. Systematic errors due to unwanted radical chemistry or VOC photolysis were considered negligible, as the experiments were performed at low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (and hence OH) concentrations and the studied esters do not absorb at 266 nm.

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M154" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VOC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>loss</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.R12" content-type="numbered reaction"><label>R6</label><mml:math id="M155" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e3091">Exemplary PLP-LIF dataset, showing the determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 340 K. The individual data points are experiments performed at different EB concentrations, for each of which the pseudo first order decay rate of OH radicals has been obtained by exponentially fitting the OH signal (as shown in the inset for the data point <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A linear regression of the data results in the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (here: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>slope</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> error, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>intercept</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The experiments conducted without any added EB were not used in the fit.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3265">The conditions and resulting rate coefficients for all PLP-LIF experiments conducted in this work are listed in Table S4 in the Supplement. The room temperature rate coefficients of the studied esters are listed along with SAR predictions and literature values (for EB only) in Table 2. Generally, there is very good agreement between the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined in York and Leeds, respectively, averaging to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (weighted mean with statistical error). There is also good agreement between these experimental values and the body of literature. Notably, the two studies based on absolute rate determinations (Cometto et al., 2009; Wallington et al., 1988) show the greatest consistency with the experimental data from this work. Although a VUV light source (Wallington et al., 1988) and a 248 laser (Cometto et al., 2009) which can potentially trigger the photolysis of the ester (see Sect. 3.1) were used, all absolute values reported in this work or in previous literature agree within their uncertainties. In contrast, the DFT study (Gour et al., 2014) and the study employing a relative rate approach (Ferrari et al., 1996) report lower rate coefficients. The work by Ferrari et al. (1996) was done relative to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-octane</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using the absolute rate coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by Greiner (1970). Both lower (e.g. Anderson et al., 2003) and higher (e.g. Shaw et al., 2020) rate coefficients have been reported for this reaction based on relative rate techniques since, so that a meaningful re-assessment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on an updated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-octane reactivity is currently not possible.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3415">Room temperature rate coefficients for the reactions of the esters with OH radicals, as obtained with the PLP-LIF setup in this work, according to two structure-activity-relationships (SARs), and as reported in the literature. Different methods of obtaining rate coefficients are labelled as absolute rate methods (a), relative rate methods (b), density functional theory calculations (c), or SAR predictions (d). For values based on experimental methods, different bath gases are denoted as nitrogen (§), argon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">†</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), helium (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">‡</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), or air (¶). All temperatures are within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 298 K. The room temperature coefficients obtained in this work are reported as weighted means from two determinations with statistical errors (see all single results and associated uncertainties in Table S4 in the Supplement). NA: not available.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Reaction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col5" align="center"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">This work</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">SAR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Literature</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Jenkin et al., 2018)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(Kwok and Atkinson, 1995)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (R1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (York)<sup>a§</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.53<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.83<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wallington et al., 1988)<sup>a<italic>†</italic></sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Leeds)<sup>a<italic>†</italic></sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cometto et al., 2009)<sup>a<italic>‡</italic></sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ferrari et al., 1996)<sup>b<italic>¶</italic></sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.87 (Gour et al., 2014)<sup>c</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (R2)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (York)<sup>a§</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.27<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.92<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (R3)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (York)<sup>a§</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.65<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.24<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH (R4)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (York)<sup>a§</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.29<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.61<sup>d</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">NA</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e3956">The room-temperature values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reported in this work were obtained at 26 and 29 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bath gas) using the York set-up and at 37 and 38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ar bath gas) using the Leeds set-up. Their agreement with the PLP-LIF results by Cometto et al. (2009) at 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (He bath gas) and with the flash photolysis resonance fluorescence (FP-RF) results by Wallington et al.  (1988) at 25–50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ar bath gas) suggests that all of these measurements were obtained in the high-pressure limit. This is in accordance with other reactions of oxygenated VOCs with OH, such as acetone where strong curvature was observed but no pressure dependence was found between 20 and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Torr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wollenhaupt et al., 2000).</p>
      <p id="d2e4022">Both SARs (Jenkin et al., 2018; Kwok and Atkinson, 1995) underestimate the absolute rate coefficients as obtained by the PLP-LIF experiments for all four compounds, but correctly predict the methylated derivatives to be more reactive than EB. The SAR by Jenkin et al. (2018) furthermore correctly reflects the increase in reactivity in the specific order EB <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It should be noted that EB was used in the training set of the Jenkin et al. (2018) SAR with a training value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (taken from Calvert et al., 2011, in turn based on Wallington et al., 1988 and Ferrari et al., 1996) which is very closely matched by the SAR output of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the methylated EB derivatives were not included in the SAR training set, the optimisation of EB towards a value which is lower than all absolute rate coefficients reported in the literature may partly explain why the predicted reactivities fall below the experimental values for all compounds studied here. The Kwok and Atkinson (1995) SAR, on the other hand, does not specifically aim to describe esters, and is stated to have limited applicability to compounds outside the training set.</p>
      <p id="d2e4133">The most reactive sites in EB as predicted by the Jenkin et al. (2018) SAR are the ones <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to the carbonyl group (Fig. 1). At these positions, 7-membered hydrogen-bonded pre-reaction complexes involving the OH radical and the carbonyl oxygen can be formed. Such complexes lead to faster reactions by stabilizing the transition state and increasing the probability of quantum mechanical tunnelling (Galano and Raúl Alvarez-Idaboy, 2008; Shannon et al., 2014). The high reactivity of the H atoms attached to these <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons has previously been referred to in the context of the activating effect of the ester group (Mellouki et al., 2003) or the anomalously high reactivity of butyrates compared to propionates (Wallington et al., 1988). Reflecting these site-specific differences, the relative reactivities observed for the other esters may be explained by the existence and position of their respective methyl substituents. If a methyl group is attached to one of the carbons in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> position to the carbonyl group, such as is the case for EI and IB, the overall reactivity of the molecule increases further, not only because of the higher total number of oxidisable bonds in the molecule but also because the remaining H atom attached to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon becomes still more reactive (Table S5 in the Supplement). As the methyl group of IB is located on the alkoxy side of the molecule (Fig. 1), and the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is substantially higher for EI compared to IB in both the experimental dataset and the Jenkin et al. (2018) SAR prediction (Table 2), one might infer that the involvement of the alkoxy oxygen decreases the stability of the pre-reaction complexes. In case of EM, the methyl group is attached to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon and the remaining H atom is oriented away from the carbonyl oxygen. While a pre-reaction complex with the alkoxy oxygen via a 6-membered ring might be possible, the alkoxy oxygen has a smaller partial negative charge than the carbonyl oxygen and is therefore less likely to participate in hydrogen bonding. This description is consistent with the lower value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both the experimental and the SAR data, but in contrast to the DFT study by Gour et al. (2014) where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon is predicted to be the most reactive site.</p>
      <p id="d2e4223">For evaluating the effect of temperature changes on the reactivity of EB (Fig. 4), we combined and compared the dataset from this work with the available literature data and SAR predictions. The only previous study that evaluated the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>for different temperatures (Cometto et al., 2009) covered the temperature range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">253</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">372</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the data from this work describe the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">296</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">741</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and therefore include higher temperatures that have not been investigated before. In their overlapping range, the two datasets agree well. Together, the cold-temperature and high-temperature data form a consistent pattern that resembles a U-shape with a minimum at 387 K. Using all available absolute data for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (this work; Cometto et al., 2009; Wallington et al., 1988), this temperature dependency can be described by the following four-parameter expression (unit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">253</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">741</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">642</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1605</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fact that there is a negative temperature dependence for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">387</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at all supports the idea of the prevalence of mechanisms other than direct H abstraction. Similar near-zero or negative temperature dependencies have been found for a range of esters in other studies and have been ascribed to the formation of hydrogen-bonded pre-reaction complexes (Cometto et al., 2009; Liang et al., 2010 and references therein; Mellouki et al., 2003 and references therein; Wallington et al., 1988). Especially at low temperatures, these complexes can dominate the overall reactivity. The seemingly negative activation energy has been related to either well-trapping of the complex or a two-step reaction sequence including the reversible formation of the pre-reaction complex followed by the irreversible decomposition of the complex to the products (Galano and Raúl Alvarez-Idaboy, 2008). For EB specifically, the importance of hydrogen-bonded pre-reaction complexes has been demonstrated theoretically using DFT approaches (Gour et al., 2014).</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e4424">Temperature-dependence of the reaction of EB with OH. Comparison of two SAR predictions, experimental data from this work (uncertainties are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical errors), and experimental and theoretical values from the literature. The four-parameter fit is based on all kinetic data obtained with absolute methods (this work; Cometto et al., 2009; Wallington et al., 1988).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4443">The observed temperature dependence of EB resembles a superposition of the two SAR predictions. The SAR proposed by Kwok and Atkinson (1995) was originally tested and validated for oxygenated compounds over a very extensive temperature range, and is applied here for temperatures between 250 and 700 K. It follows the observed Arrhenius behaviour at higher temperatures albeit with a large shift of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the experimental data. However, it fails to describe the strong curvature and the non-Arrhenius behaviour at lower temperatures. This is likely due to the fact that the SAR was not designed or trained for esters, and the activating effect of the ester functional group is only considered for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbon which is much less likely to be involved in pre-reaction complexes than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons. In contrast, the SAR by Jenkin et al. (2018), which does contain an explicit description of the neighbouring ester group for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons, provides a very good match with the observed temperature dependence in the range between 250 and around 360 K, except for an offset that may relate to the above-mentioned optimisation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> towards <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The good qualitative fit of the negative temperature dependence suggests that the more holistic consideration of the ester functional group is appropriate and that the branching ratios and relative site reactivities are reliable. The Jenkin et al. (2018) SAR is targeted towards atmospherically relevant temperatures rather than combustion-regime temperatures, hence the ability of the SAR to describe the shift towards an Arrhenius behaviour at higher temperatures is not evaluated here. Specifically, we restricted our calculations to the range between 250 and 375 K, based on the temperature range covered by the training data set for saturated esters of the SAR.  There is a slight disagreement at the higher end of this range, where the SAR appears to underestimate the curvature observed in the experimental data. This behaviour is not unexpected, as SAR predictions tend to become less accurate towards the limits of their designated temperature ranges.</p>
      <p id="d2e4545">For all three methylated EB derivatives, the investigated temperature range was dominated by a negative temperature dependence (Fig. 5). The non-Arrhenius behaviour generally seems more pronounced for the methylated esters than for EB, especially so for EI and IB. In the predictions of the SAR by Jenkin et al. (2018) as well, the negative temperature dependence is clearly strongest for EI and IB, followed by EM (Fig. S4 in the Supplement). This is consistent with the observation that the room temperature reactivity, which in turn is driven by the feasibility of pre-reaction-complexes that are especially important at lower temperature, is highest for EI and IB. The site-specific reactivities predicted by the Jenkin et al. (2018) SAR support the idea that it is the H atoms attached to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons which are largely responsible for the negative temperature dependence (Fig. S5 in the Supplement).  It can be concluded that the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>EB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EI</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> applies to all of (i) the ability of the compound to form pre-reaction complexes, (ii) the magnitude of the non-Arrhenius behaviour, and (iii) the room temperature rate coefficient for the reaction with OH.</p>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4577">Temperature-dependence of the reaction of <bold>(a)</bold> EM, <bold>(b)</bold> EI, and <bold>(c)</bold> IB with OH. Comparison of two SAR predictions and experimental data from this work, fitted with a four-parameter expression in case of EM and IB and a two-parameter expression in case of EI. Uncertainties are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> statistical errors.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4605">Similar to EB, EM and IB show a U-shaped temperature dependence, with minima at 371 and 397 K respectively, and were therefore fitted with four-parameter expressions (units <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), resulting in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">402</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">433</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7774</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">417</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">757</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5346</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For EI, there is no clear minimum, and fitting a four-parameter expression resulted in two terms that each described a negative temperature dependence. Hence, we used a two-parameter expression for EI instead (unit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">408</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">793</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering that EI is the compound with the highest tendency to form pre-reaction complexes, it seems plausible that these complexes could be relevant over an extended temperature range, shifting the transition between the non-Arrhenius and Arrhenius regimes towards a higher temperature. Given the limited scope of the datasets for the methylated esters, we would like to emphasize that the reported temperature dependencies are only valid within their specified ranges and that any extrapolations may be subject to large uncertainty. This is particularly true at the high-temperature end, where more data would be needed to accurately describe the curvature.</p>
      <p id="d2e4895">Secondary isotope effects were investigated in a further series of PLP-LIF experiments including the Reaction (R7) between EB and deuterated hydroxyl radicals OD.

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.R13" content-type="numbered reaction"><label>R7</label><mml:math id="M241" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>EB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>OD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>products</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In particular, we evaluated the ratio of the rate coefficients for the reactions of EB with OD radicals and OH radicals respectively. This ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, does not show a distinct temperature dependence over the range between 298 and 673 K, averaging to 1.09 (Fig. S6 in the Supplement). For the structurally related compound methyl formate, marginally faster reactions with OD radicals compared to OH radicals have been explained by the slightly lower activation barrier height, which in turn results from differences in the vibrational frequency modes (Robertson et al., 2024). While all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> datapoints in this work agree within their uncertainties, the data still hint at a possible increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at decreasing temperature. This observation is consistent with previous studies on methyl formate (Robertson et al., 2024), methylglyoxal (Baeza-Romero et al., 2007), and limonene (Braure et al., 2014), and points at a kinetic isotope effect and a greater influence of the H or D atom of the radical than would occur in direct H abstraction. In turn, this would support the idea that H-bonded pre-reaction complexes involving the OH or OD radical (and/or addition reactions in case of unsaturated compounds) become increasingly relevant at lower temperatures. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">387</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e. over most of the temperature range for which we determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the kinetics of EB show Arrhenius behaviour and are hence dominated by direct H abstraction (Fig. 4). It can be hypothesized that at temperatures below room temperature where the contribution of pre-reaction complexes to the overall abstraction mechanism is higher, the ratio would increase further and reveal a stronger secondary kinetic isotope effect.</p>
      <p id="d2e5007">Finally, we investigated whether OH recycling occurs in the oxidation of EB.  OH recycling following the initial photooxidation reaction is not only relevant for assessing the overall gas-phase chemistry mechanism and impact of a given compound (Lelieveld et al., 2008), but can also falsify PLP-LIF experiments that rely on observing the decay rate of OH. Substantial OH recycling causes the OH signal to become biexponential, which may however be difficult to resolve and instead appear as a slower monoexponential decay, such that fitting the signal without accounting for recycling would lead to an underestimation of the VOC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH rate coefficients (Baeza-Romero et al., 2007; Potter et al., 2018, 2019). Generally, OH recycling proceeds via intermediate peroxy radicals and therefore requires the presence of oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). To probe for OH recycling, we therefore evaluated the OH signal as a function of added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while the EB concentration remained constant.  Since OH recycling is generally more likely to occur at high temperatures (Potter et al., 2018), we performed these experiments at 477 K and at 741 K (Fig. S7 in the Supplement). In both cases, the OH decay rate was not affected by the added <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and proceeded monoexponentially with the same decay rate as in the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Hence, OH recycling did not affect the experiments performed in this work and is negligible under all standard tropospheric or indoor conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Atmospheric implications and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5070">In this work we investigated the principal gas-phase removal processes for EB and its derivatives, including radical reactions and photolysis. In the visible and near-UV range, there was essentially no photon absorption and insufficient energy to break the ester functional group. Photolysis can therefore be disregarded at standard ground-level conditions or in typical indoor environments. Notably, EB and its derivatives show an absorption band from the forbidden <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>←</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition which peaks at around 213 nm. Even at higher altitudes and under conditions of increased photon fluxes in the UV-C range, however, the calculated upper limit photolysis rates remain too low to be of significance. As such, while the photolysis quantum yields of EB and its derivatives are not known, they are of minor real-world relevance.</p>
      <p id="d2e5088">Reactions with OH, on the other hand, were rapid in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at room temperature. Under standard oxidative conditions of the troposphere, they are therefore likely the main sink. The room temperature rate coefficients decreased in the order <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>EI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>IB</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EM</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>EB</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This hierarchy of reactivity was attributed to the enhancement of the reactivity of specific sites following methylation, notably when the sites are in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> position to the carbonyl group and can hence facilitate the formation of pre-reaction complexes between the molecule and the radical. These pre-reaction complexes stabilize the transition state and therefore speed up the reaction. As they are especially prevalent at cold temperatures, they may explain the complex non-Arrhenius temperature dependencies observed for EB and its derivatives.  Together with more conventional Arrhenius like behaviour at high temperatures, the result was a U-shaped temperature dependence, which was especially evident over the extended temperature range studied for EB.</p>
      <p id="d2e5169">The tropospheric lifetimes of EB and its derivatives were calculated solely against the reaction with OH radicals as their main loss process, using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E14"/>). 

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M256" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total lifetime in s, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the lifetime with regard to OH radical reactions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the rate coefficient of the reaction of the ester with OH in units of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the OH radical concentration in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. We adopted an average tropospheric OH concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Lelieveld et al., 2016), resulting in lifetimes in the range of 22–45 h (Table 3). These lifetimes are a rough estimate and may differ substantially depending on the conditions and depending on where and when the emission occurs. As OH radicals in the troposphere are mainly created photolytically and hence much more abundant during daytime, the actual lifetime can be much longer and dispersion much further if EB and its derivatives are released at nighttime. Furthermore, the lifetimes listed here are valid at room temperatures, but higher rate coefficients were found for all esters when the temperature decreases.  Hence, the lifetimes could be shorter in cold environments, although this effect could be compensated by lower OH concentrations.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e5359">Lifetimes against the reaction with OH radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and corresponding estimated photochemical ozone creation potentials (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POCP</mml:mtext><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of EB and its derivatives. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POCP</mml:mtext><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculations were based on the method by Jenkin et al. (2017). Lifetimes were calculated assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Compound</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POCP</mml:mtext><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">28</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">EI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">29</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e5536">Importantly, the calculated lifetimes are an upper limit as they neglect other losses besides the reaction with OH. Further removal pathways of EB and its derivatives are possible, however, and chlorine atom reactions may be the next most relevant sink. At room temperature, these reactions have been found to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cometto et al., 2009), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ramya and Rajakumar, 2019), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ifang et al., 2015) for EB; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.10</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.19</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for EM (Ifang et al., 2015); and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for EI (Ifang et al., 2015). These rate coefficients are by factors of approx. 10–20 higher than the corresponding rate coefficients for the OH radical reactions determined in this work, which is in accordance with the general trend of VOCs being on average by about one order of magnitude more reactive towards Cl atoms than towards OH radicals (Young et al., 2014). Generally, chlorine atom concentrations in different environments are poorly characterized and highly uncertain. However, on average they tend to be several orders of magnitude lower than tropospheric OH radical concentrations in the troposphere, so that Cl atoms reactions typically have little influence on the overall lifetime under most conditions, even if the rate coefficients are by about one order of magnitude higher (Liang et al., 2010; Notario et al., 1998).</p>
      <p id="d2e5804">With respect to other potential atmospheric sinks, such as wet removal or reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, it can be assumed that EB and its derivatives behave similarly to other aliphatic esters. The rate coefficients for the reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with a range of different esters have been determined to be in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (upper limits) at room temperature, which is not fast enough to make a relevant contribution to the overall degradation rate of the esters but could influence night-time chemistry to some extent (Langer et al., 1993). In terms of wet removal, the high volatility and low water solubility of esters have prompted the conclusion that this mechanism is a negligible sink (Liang et al., 2010). Hence, approximating the overall lifetime by considering only OH radical reactions is reasonable in most settings, although chlorine atom reactions may be of relevance if there is a strong source.</p>
      <p id="d2e5880">It should be noted that the emission of the aroma compounds EB and its derivatives occurs mainly indoors, where their lifetime and fate depends strongly on the specific activities and settings. For instance, concentrations of OH tend to be about an order of magnitude lower than outdoors, but are also more variable and may peak following household activities such as cleaning or in proximity to windows (Weschler and Carslaw, 2018). Generally, however, the lifetime against the reaction with OH is likely to be significantly longer indoors compared to outdoor conditions. On the other hand, chlorine atom reactions may be highly relevant in cases when the usage of chlorinated products such as bleach releases a substantial amount of chlorinated species (Wong et al., 2017) which may react to form atomic Cl (Faxon and Allen, 2013; Ravishankara, 2009). In that case, Cl atom reactions could influence the overall lifetime, particularly if [Cl] is by less than two orders of magnitude smaller (or even higher) than [OH]. This becomes even more important because combinations of cleaning products co-emit chlorinated species and aroma compounds such as EB and its derivatives, which could result in a highly reactive mixture and fast formation of secondary products. In most other situations, however, air exchange rates are likely to outcompete reactive losses, so that ventilation to the outdoor surroundings would be the dominant fate.</p>
      <p id="d2e5883">In order to better characterize some of the outdoor air quality impacts that may follow from the reactions of EB and its derivatives, we calculated their estimated photochemical ozone creation potentials (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POCP</mml:mtext><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) according to the methodology proposed by Jenkin et al. (2017). The resulting values of 28–34 (Table 3) are compared to structurally related compounds and other commonly used aroma compounds in Fig. 6. EA has a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POCP</mml:mtext><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than EB and its derivatives, due to the smaller molecular size and lower number of oxidisable bonds. Meanwhile, all other compounds shown here for comparison have higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POCP</mml:mtext><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>s than EB and its derivatives, mostly due to the possibility to react with ozone (ethene, dihydromyrcenol, limonene), substantially higher rate coefficients for the reaction with OH radicals (dihydromyrcenol, limonene), a higher number of oxidisable bonds (heptane, 4-heptanone, dihydromyrcenol, limonene), or the possibility for photolysis (4-heptanone). In terms of ozone formation, EB and its derivatives are hence of less concern than some other aroma compounds.</p>

      <fig id="F6"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e5922">Comparison of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>POCP</mml:mtext><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of EB and its derivatives with ethene (POCP reference compound), structurally related compounds, and other commonly used aroma compounds.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/9277/2026/acp-26-9277-2026-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e5942">However, the production of ground-level ozone represents only one dimension of air pollution. For a range of alkyl esters, Ifang et al. (2015) have pointed out that the formation of acidic products is likely to contribute substantially to the emergence of particulate matter, suggesting that aerosol formation may pose a greater environmental and health concern than ozone production. While detailed product studies – either experimental or computational – were beyond the scope of this work, we evaluated the first steps following the initial reaction of EB with OH at its most reactive sites using the Generator for Explicit Chemistry and Kinetics of Organics in the Atmosphere, GECKO-A in short (Aumont et al., 2005). As illustrated in Fig. S8 in the Supplement, the products that are predicted to be formed after abstraction of one of the H atoms attached to either of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> carbons are multifunctional. As such, they are likely to have a low volatility and a high potential to form secondary organic aerosol (SOA), which ultimately impacts both indoor and outdoor air quality as well as radiative forcing (Chaturvedi et al., 2023; Hoyle et al., 2009; Mutzel et al., 2015). Additionally, some of the gaseous organic reaction products can induce direct adverse health effects, which has led to a call for a more explicit consideration of these products when assessing air quality impacts. Metrics such as the secondary product creation potential (SPCP) introduced by Carslaw and Shaw (2019) can help to better characterize the potential harm induced by a given VOC, but require knowledge of the formation rates of hazardous products, as well as knowledge of which VOCs are harmful to human health (data exist for relatively few VOCs at present). Hence, future studies focusing on reaction mechanisms and product yields, as well as on the toxicity and particle formation potential of the photooxidation products, would help to refine our understanding of the fate and impact of EB and its derivatives.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5957">All underlying data are included in the Supplement. Any further information is available upon request from the corresponding authors.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5960">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9277-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-9277-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5969">FL: investigation, formal analysis, visualization, writing (original draft preparation). MAB: investigation, resources, writing (review and editing). PWS: resources, writing (review and editing). NC: supervision, writing (review and editing). TJD: conceptualization, resources, supervision, writing (review and editing).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5975">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5981">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5987">The authors would like to acknowledge technical support by Martyn Ward (GC-MS), Chris Anthony (atmospheric chemistry laboratories), Danny Shaw (physical chemistry laboratories, laser safety), and the University of York Chemistry Teaching Labs (UV-vis spectrometer). The Viking cluster was used during this project, which is a high performance compute facility provided by the University of York. We are grateful for computational support from the University of York, IT Services, and the Research IT team.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5992">This work was supported by the Leeds-York-Hull Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Doctoral Training Partnership (DTP) Panorama under grant no. NE/S007458/1.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5998">This paper was edited by Eleanor Browne and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, R. S., Czuba, E., Ernst, D., Huang, L., Thompson, A. E., and Rudolph, J.: Method for Measuring Carbon Kinetic Isotope Effects of Gas-Phase Reactions of Light Hydrocarbons with the Hydroxyl Radical, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 6191–6199, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp034256d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp034256d</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Anhaia-Machado, J. O., Soares, A. C. G., de Oliveira Pinto, C. A. S., Barrera, A. I. Á., Baby, A. R., and Trossini, G. H. G.: Molecular Modeling Based on Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (TD-DFT) Applied to the UV-Vis Spectra of Natural Compounds, Chemistry, 5, 41–53, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry5010004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/chemistry5010004</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Aumont, B., Szopa, S., and Madronich, S.: Modelling the evolution of organic carbon during its gas-phase tropospheric oxidation: development of an explicit model based on a self generating approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2497–2517, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Ausloos, P.: The photolysis of alkyl esters, Can. J. Chem., 36, 383–392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/v58-054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/v58-054</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Badawy, T., Williamson, J., and Xu, H.: Laminar burning characteristics of ethyl propionate, ethyl butyrate, ethyl acetate, gasoline and ethanol fuels, Fuel, 183, 627–640, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.087" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.087</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Baeza-Romero, M. T., Glowacki, D. R., Blitz, M. A., Heard, D. E., Pilling, M. J., Rickard, A. R., and Seakins, P. W.: A combined experimental and theoretical study of the reaction between methylglyoxal and OH/OD radical: OH regeneration, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9, 4114–4128, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B702916K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/B702916K</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Barba, C., Beno, N., Guichard, E., and Thomas-Danguin, T.: Selecting odorant compounds to enhance sweet flavor perception by gas chromatography/olfactometry-associated taste (GC/O-AT), Food Chem., 257, 172–181, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.152</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bicas, J. L., Molina, G., Dionísio, A. P., Barros, F. F. C., Wagner, R., Maróstica, M. R., and Pastore, G. M.: Volatile constituents of exotic fruits from Brazil, Food Res. Int., 44, 1843–1855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.012</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Blitz, M. A., Guy, P., Shannon, R., and Seakins, P. W.: Rate Coefficients and Branching Ratios for the Reaction of the OH Radical with Formic Acid under Low-Temperature Combustion Conditions and the Fate of the HOCO Product, J. Phys. Chem. A, 129, 6437–6450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c01814" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.5c01814</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation> Boelens, H., Haring, H. G., and Takken, H. J.: The Influence of Molecular-Structure on Olfactive Quality (a Quantitative Approach), Chem. Ind., 1, 26–30, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Braure, T., Bedjanian, Y., Romanias, M. N., Morin, J., Riffault, V., Tomas, A., and Coddeville, P.: Experimental Study of the Reactions of Limonene with OH and OD Radicals: Kinetics and Products, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 9482–9490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507180g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp507180g</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> Calvert, J., Mellouki, A., Orlando, J., Pilling, M., and Wallington, T.: Mechanisms of Atmospheric Oxidation of the Oxygenates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1634 pp., ISBN 978-0-19-976707-6, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Carslaw, N. and Shaw, D.: Secondary product creation potential (SPCP): a metric for assessing the potential impact of indoor air pollution on human health, Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 21, 1313–1322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00140A" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C9EM00140A</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Caswell, L. R., Howard, M. F., and Onisto, T. M.: Solvent and substituent effects upon the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transition of aliphatic carboxylic acids and esters, J. Org. Chem., 41, 3312–3316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00882a023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jo00882a023</ext-link>, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Chaturvedi, S., Kumar, A., Singh, V., Chakraborty, B., Kumar, R., and Min, L.: Recent Advancement in Organic Aerosol Understanding: a Review of Their Sources, Formation, and Health Impacts, Water Air Soil Poll., 234, 750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06772-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11270-023-06772-0</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Chen, I.-Y., Chang, C.-W., Fittschen, C., and Luo, P.-L.: Accurate Kinetic Studies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Radical–Radical Reaction through Direct Measurement of Precursor and Radical Concentrations with High-Resolution Time-Resolved Dual-Comb Spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 15, 3733–3739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00494" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00494</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Closson, W. D. and Haug, Pat.: The Effects of Solvent and Structure on the Low Intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) Electronic Transition of Carboxylate Esters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 2384–2389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01066a018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ja01066a018</ext-link>, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Cometto, P. M., Daële, V., Idir, M., Lane, S. I., and Mellouki, A.: Reaction Rate Coefficients of OH Radicals and Cl Atoms with Ethyl Propanoate, n-Propyl Propanoate, Methyl 2-Methylpropanoate, and Ethyl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Butanoate, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 10745–10752, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9061708" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp9061708</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Doner, A. C., Christianson, M. G., Davis, J. C., Koritzke, A. L., Larsson, A., Frandsen, K., and Rotavera, B.: Vacuum-ultraviolet absorption cross-sections of functionalized cyclic hydrocarbons: Six-membered rings, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 236, 106603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106603</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>D'Souza Metcalf, J., Winkless, R. K., Robinson, A., Smith, S. C., Rickard, A. R., and Dillon, T. J.: Practical atmospheric photochemical kinetics for undergraduate teaching and research, RSC Sustain., 3, 5146–5154, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D5SU00681C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D5SU00681C</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>El-Nahas, A. M., Navarro, M. V., Simmie, J. M., Bozzelli, J. W., Curran, H. J., Dooley, S., and Metcalfe, W.: Enthalpies of Formation, Bond Dissociation Energies and Reaction Paths for the Decomposition of Model Biofuels: Ethyl Propanoate and Methyl Butanoate, J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 3727–3739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp067413s" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp067413s</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>El-Nahas, A. M., Heikal, L. A., Mangood, A. H., and El-Shereefy, E.-S. E.: Structures and Energetics of Unimolecular Thermal Degradation of Isopropyl Butanoate as a Model Biofuel: Density Functional Theory and Ab Initio Studies, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 7996–8002, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103397f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp103397f</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Faxon, C. B. and Allen, D. T.: Chlorine chemistry in urban atmospheres: a review, Environ. Chem., 10, 221–233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN13026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN13026</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Ferrari, C., Roche, A., Jacob, V., Foster, P., and Baussand, P.: Kinetics of the reaction of OH radicals with a series of esters under simulated conditions at 295 K, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 28, 609–614, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1996)28:8&lt;609::AID-KIN6&gt;3.0.CO;2-Z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1996)28:8&lt;609::AID-KIN6&gt;3.0.CO;2-Z</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Li, X., Caricato, M., Marenich, A. V., Bloino, J., Janesko, B. G., Gomperts, R., Mennucci, B., Hratchian, H. P., Ortiz, J. V., Izmaylov, A. F., Sonnenberg, J. L., Williams-Young, D., Ding, F., Lipparini, F., Egidi, F., Goings, J., Peng, B., Petrone, A., Henderson, T., Ranasinghe, D., Zakrzewski, V. G., Gao, J., Rega, N., Zheng, G., Liang, W., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Throssell, K., Montgomery, J. A., Jr., Peralta, J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M. J., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E. N., Kudin, K. N., Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T. A., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A. P., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Adamo, C., Cammi, R., Ochterski, J. W., Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B., and Fox, D. J.: Gaussian 16, Revision C.02, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT,  <uri>https://gaussian.com/gaussian16/</uri> (last access: 30 June 2026), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Galano, A. and Raúl Alvarez-Idaboy, J.: Atmospheric Reactions of Oxygenated Volatile Organic Compounds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OH Radicals: Role of Hydrogen-Bonded Intermediates and Transition States, in: Advances in Quantum Chemistry, edited by: Goodsite, M. E. and Johnson, M. S., vol. 55, Academic Press, 245–274, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3276(07)00212-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0065-3276(07)00212-2</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Gour, N. K., Deka, R. C., Singh, H. J., and Mishra, B. K.: Theoretical study on the gas-phase reactions of ethyl butyrate with OH radicals at 298 K, Monatsh. Chem., 145, 1759–1767, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-014-1255-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00706-014-1255-0</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Greiner, N. R.: Hydroxyl Radical Kinetics by Kinetic Spectroscopy, VI. Reactions with Alkanes in the Range 300–500° K, J. Chem. Phys., 53, 1070–1076, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1674099</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Hong, Z., Cook, R. D., Davidson, D. F., and Hanson, R. K.: A Shock Tube Study of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using Laser Absorption of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OH, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 5718–5727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp100204z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp100204z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Hoyle, C. R., Myhre, G., Berntsen, T. K., and Isaksen, I. S. A.: Anthropogenic influence on SOA and the resulting radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2715–2728, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2715-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2715-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Ifang, S., Benter, T., and Barnes, I.: Reactions of Cl atoms with alkyl esters: kinetic, mechanism and atmospheric implications, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 22, 4820–4832, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2913-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-014-2913-9</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Wallington, T. J.: Photochemical ozone creation potentials for volatile organic compounds: Rationalization and estimation, Atmos. Environ., 163, 128–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.024</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Jenkin, M. E., Valorso, R., Aumont, B., Rickard, A. R., and Wallington, T. J.: Estimation of rate coefficients and branching ratios for gas-phase reactions of OH with aliphatic organic compounds for use in automated mechanism construction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9297–9328, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9297-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-9297-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Kim, Y.-H., Kim, K.-H., Szulejko, J. E., and Parker, D.: Quantitative Analysis of Fragrance and Odorants Released from Fresh and Decaying Strawberries, Sensors, 13, 7939–7978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s130607939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/s130607939</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P., Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. V., Hern, S. C., and Engelmann, W. H.: The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants, J. Expo. Sci. Env. Epid., 11, 231–252, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/sj.jea.7500165</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Knothe, G. and Steidley, K. R.: Fatty Acid Alkyl Esters as Solvents: Evaluation of the Kauri-Butanol Value. Comparison to Hydrocarbons, Dimethyl Diesters, and Other Oxygenates, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 4177–4182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ie1023172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ie1023172</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kraft, P., Bajgrowicz, J. A., Denis, C., and Fráter, G.: Odds and Trends: Recent Developments in the Chemistry of Odorants, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 39, 2980–3010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20000901)39:17%3C2980::AID-ANIE2980%3E3.0.CO;2-%23" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/1521-3773(20000901)39:17%3C2980::AID-ANIE2980%3E3.0.CO;2-%23</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kwok, E. S. C. and Atkinson, R.: Estimation of hydroxyl radical reaction rate constants for gas-phase organic compounds using a structure-reactivity relationship: An update, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1685–1695, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00069-B" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(95)00069-B</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Labbe, D., Rytz, A., Morgenegg, C., Ali, S., and Martin, N.: Subthreshold Olfactory Stimulation Can Enhance Sweetness, Chem. Senses, 32, 205–214, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/chemse/bjl040</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Langer, S., Ljungström, E., and Wängberg, I.: Rates of reaction between the nitrate radical and some aliphatic esters, J. Chem. Soc. Farad. T., 89, 425–431, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/FT9938900425" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/FT9938900425</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lary, D. J. and Shallcross, D. E.: Central role of carbonyl compounds in atmospheric chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 19771–19778, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD901184</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Dentener, F. J., Peters, W., and Krol, M. C.: On the role of hydroxyl radicals in the self-cleansing capacity of the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2337–2344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2337-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2337-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H., Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H., Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D., and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature06870</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution, budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Liang, P., Mu, Y., Daële, V., and Mellouki, A.: Rate Coefficients for Reactions of OH and Cl with Esters, ChemPhysChem, 11, 4097–4102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000262" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cphc.201000262</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Link, M. F., Shore, A., Hamadani, B. H., and Poppendieck, D.: Ozone Generation from a Germicidal Ultraviolet Lamp with Peak Emission at 222 nm, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 10, 675–679, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00318" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00318</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Ludwig, W., Brandt, B., Friedrichs, G., and Temps, F.: Kinetics of the Reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by Time-Resolved Mass Spectrometry, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 3330–3337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0557464" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp0557464</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Mapelli, C., Schleicher, J. V., Hawtin, A., Rankine, C. D., Whiting, F. C., Byrne, F., McElroy, C. R., Roman, C., Arsene, C., Olariu, R. I., Bejan, I. G., and Dillon, T. J.: Atmospheric breakdown chemistry of the new “green” solvent 2,2,5,5-tetramethyloxolane via gas-phase reactions with OH and Cl radicals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14589–14602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14589-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-14589-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Mapelli, C., Donnelly, J. K., Hogan, Ú. E., Rickard, A. R., Robinson, A. T., Byrne, F., McElroy, C. R., Curchod, B. F. E., Hollas, D., and Dillon, T. J.: Atmospheric oxidation of new “green” solvents – Part 2: methyl pivalate and pinacolone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7767–7779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7767-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7767-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation> McMillan, V.: Photochemistry, personal communication to J. G. Calvert, J. N. Pitts Jr., John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, p. 429, 1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Mellouki, A., Le Bras, G., and Sidebottom, H.: Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Oxidation of Oxygenated Organic Compounds in the Gas Phase, Chem. Rev., 103, 5077–5096, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020526x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr020526x</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Mutzel, A., Poulain, L., Berndt, T., Iinuma, Y., Rodigast, M., Böge, O., Richters, S., Spindler, G., Sipilä, M., Jokinen, T., Kulmala, M., and Herrmann, H.: Highly Oxidized Multifunctional Organic Compounds Observed in Tropospheric Particles: A Field and Laboratory Study, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 7754–7761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00885" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00885</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Naito, K., Sawadaishi, K., and Kawasaki, M.: Photobiochemical mechanisms of biomolecules relevant to germicidal ultraviolet irradiation at 222 and 254 nm, Sci. Rep., 12, 18217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22969-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-022-22969-5</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Nakashima, K., Uchida-Kai, K., Koyanagi, M., and Kanda, Y.: Solvent Effects on the Intensities of Forbidden Bands of Molecules. Absorption Spectra of Acetone and Cyclopentanone, B. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 55, 415–419, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.55.415" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1246/bcsj.55.415</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>NCAR: Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible (TUV) Radiation Model by the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), v5.3, web version of model,  <uri>https://www.acom.ucar.edu/Models/TUV/Interactive_TUV/</uri> (last access: 28 Nov 2025), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Nematollahi, N., Doronila, A., Mornane, P. J., Duan, A., Kolev, S. D., and Steinemann, A.: Volatile chemical emissions from fragranced baby products, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 11, 785–790, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0593-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11869-018-0593-1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Notario, A., Le Bras, G., and Mellouki, A.: Absolute Rate Constants for the Reactions of Cl Atoms with a Series of Esters, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 3112–3117, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980416n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp980416n</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Onel, L., Blitz, M. A., and Seakins, P. W.: Direct Determination of the Rate Coefficient for the Reaction of OH Radicals with Monoethanol Amine (MEA) from 296–510 K, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 3, 853–856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jz300200c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jz300200c</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Pandey, N., Mehata, M. S., Pant, S., and Tewari, N.: Structural, Electronic and NLO Properties of 6-aminoquinoline: A DFT/TD-DFT Study, J. Fluoresc., 31, 1719–1729, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-021-02788-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10895-021-02788-z</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Symonds, G. A., Jenks, O. J., Stark, H., Handschy, A. V., de Gouw, J. A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Significant Production of Ozone from Germicidal UV Lights at 222 nm, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 10, 668–674, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00314" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00314</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Potter, D. G., Wiseman, S., Blitz, M. A., and Seakins, P. W.: Laser Photolysis Kinetic Study of OH Radical Reactions with Methyl <italic>tert</italic>-Butyl Ether and Trimethyl Orthoformate under Conditions Relevant to Low Temperature Combustion: Measurements of Rate Coefficients and OH Recycling, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 9701–9711, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b09122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.8b09122</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Potter, D. G., Blitz, M. A., and Seakins, P. W.: A generic method for determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rate parameters via OH regeneration, Chem. Phys. Lett., 730, 213–219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.06.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cplett.2019.06.014</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Ramya, C. B. and Rajakumar, B.: Cl atom initiated tropospheric chemistry of ethyl butyrate, Chem. Phys. Lett., 731, 136594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.136594" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cplett.2019.136594</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Rao, P. D., Husile, N., Strasser, A. A., and Wise, P. M.: Pilot Experiment: the Effect of Added Flavorants on the Taste and Pleasantness of Mixtures of Glycerol and Propylene Glycol, Chemosens. Percept., 11, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-017-9231-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s12078-017-9231-9</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Ravishankara, A. R.: Are chlorine atoms significant tropospheric free radicals?, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 13639–13640, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907089106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0907089106</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Robertson, N. C. K., Onel, L., Blitz, M. A., Shannon, R., Stone, D., Seakins, P. W., Robertson, S. H., Kühn, C., Pazdera, T. M., and Olzmann, M.: Temperature-Dependent, Site-Specific Rate Coefficients for the Reaction of OH (OD) with Methyl Formate Isotopologues via Experimental and Theoretical Studies, J. Phys. Chem. A, 128, 5028–5040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02524</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Shannon, R. J., Caravan, R. L., Blitz, M. A., and Heard, D. E.: A combined experimental and theoretical study of reactions between the hydroxyl radical and oxygenated hydrocarbons relevant to astrochemical environments, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 3466–3478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP54664K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C3CP54664K</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Shaw, J. T., Rickard, A. R., Newland, M. J., and Dillon, T. J.: Rate coefficients for reactions of OH with aromatic and aliphatic volatile organic compounds determined by the multivariate relative rate technique, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9725–9736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9725-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-9725-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Śmialek, M. A., Łabuda, M., Guthmuller, J., Hubin-Franskin, M.-J., Delwiche, J., Hoffmann, S. V., Jones, N. C., Mason, N. J., and Limão-Vieira, P.: Electronic state spectroscopy by high-resolution vacuum ultraviolet photoabsorption, He(I) photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio calculations of ethyl acetate, Eur. Phys. J. D, 70, 138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2016-70239-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1140/epjd/e2016-70239-9</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Sosa-Moguel, O., Pino, J. A., Sauri-Duch, E., and Cuevas-Glory, L.: Characterization of odor-active compounds in three varieties of ciruela (<italic>Spondias purpurea</italic> L.) fruit, Int. J. Food Prop., 21, 1008–1016, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1479858" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10942912.2018.1479858</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Sun, C., Wang, L., and Huang, Z.: Excited-state antioxidant capacity of Flavonoids based on solvent effect: A TD-DFT study, J. Mol. Liq., 404, 124973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124973" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124973</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>The Good Scents Company Information System: <uri>https://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/</uri>, last access: 20 January 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Uhde, E. and Schulz, N.: Impact of room fragrance products on indoor air quality, Atmos. Environ., 106, 492–502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.020</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>US Environmental Protection Agency: EPI Suite™ Version 1.0.1-beta, Module MPBPVP™,  <uri>https://episuite.dev/#/</uri> (last access: 25 January 2026), 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Wallington, T. J., Dagaut, P., Liu, R., and Kurylo, M. J.: The gas phase reactions of hydroxyl radicals with a series of esters over the temperature range 240–440 K, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 20, 177–186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550200210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/kin.550200210</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Wang, X., Jacob, D. J., Eastham, S. D., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhu, L., Chen, Q., Alexander, B., Sherwen, T., Evans, M. J., Lee, B. H., Haskins, J. D., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Thornton, J. A., Huey, G. L., and Liao, H.: The role of chlorine in global tropospheric chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3981–4003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3981-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3981-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Weschler, C. J. and Carslaw, N.: Indoor Chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2419–2428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b06387</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Williams, D. C., O'Rji, L. N., and Stone, D. A.: Kinetics of the reactions of OH radicals with selected acetates and other esters under simulated atmospheric conditions, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 25, 539–548, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550250704" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/kin.550250704</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wolkoff, P., Clausen, P. A., Jensen, B., Nielsen, G. D., and Wilkins, C. K.: Are We Measuring the Relevant Indoor Pollutants?, Indoor Air, 7, 92–106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00003.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00003.x</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Wollenhaupt, M., Carl, S. A., Horowitz, A., and Crowley, J. N.: Rate Coefficients for Reaction of OH with Acetone between 202 and 395 K, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 2695–2705, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993738f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp993738f</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Carslaw, N., Zhao, R., Zhou, S., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Observations and impacts of bleach washing on indoor chlorine chemistry, Indoor Air, 27, 1082–1090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12402" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ina.12402</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, Z., Zhang, S., Zhu, J., Niu, Y., Xiong, W., and Chen, F.: Identification of key aromas of grapefruit juice and study of their contributions to the enhancement of sweetness perception, Eur. Food Res. Technol., 249, 537–551, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04151-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00217-022-04151-3</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, Z., Hu, Y., Niu, Y., Zhang, J., and Yang, B.: Five representative esters and aldehydes from fruits can enhance sweet perception, LWT, 194, 115804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115804" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115804</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Xu, Y., Minhazul, K. A. H. M., and Li, X.: The occurrence, enzymatic production, and application of ethyl butanoate, an important flavor constituent, Flavour Frag. J., 35, 601–615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3613" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/ffj.3613</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Yeoman, A. M., Shaw, M., Carslaw, N., Murrells, T., Passant, N., and Lewis, A. C.: Simplified speciation and atmospheric volatile organic compound emission rates from non-aerosol personal care products, Indoor Air, 30, 459–472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/ina.12652</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Young, C. J., Washenfelder, R. A., Edwards, P. M., Parrish, D. D., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Mielke, L. H., Osthoff, H. D., Tsai, C., Pikelnaya, O., Stutz, J., Veres, P. R., Roberts, J. M., Griffith, S., Dusanter, S., Stevens, P. S., Flynn, J., Grossberg, N., Lefer, B., Holloway, J. S., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., and Brown, S. S.: Chlorine as a primary radical: evaluation of methods to understand its role in initiation of oxidative cycles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3427–3440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3427-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3427-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Kang, S., Li, J., Li, Z., Chang, J., Xu, Y., Max Lu, G., and Sun, C.: Near zero-waste biofuel production from bioderived polyhydroxybutyrate, Fuel, 286, 119405, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119405</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Gas-phase degradation of the aroma compound ethyl butyrate and its methylated derivatives: UV-C photolysis and reactions with the hydroxyl radical</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Anderson, R. S., Czuba, E., Ernst, D., Huang, L., Thompson, A. E., and Rudolph, J.: Method for Measuring
Carbon Kinetic Isotope Effects of Gas-Phase Reactions of Light Hydrocarbons with the Hydroxyl
Radical, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 6191–6199, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp034256d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp034256d</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Anhaia-Machado, J. O., Soares, A. C. G., de Oliveira Pinto, C. A. S., Barrera, A. I. Á., Baby, A. R.,
and Trossini, G. H. G.: Molecular Modeling Based on Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (TD-DFT) Applied to the
UV-Vis Spectra of Natural Compounds, Chemistry, 5, 41–53, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry5010004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/chemistry5010004</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Aumont, B., Szopa, S., and Madronich, S.: Modelling the evolution of organic carbon during its gas-phase
tropospheric oxidation: development of an explicit model based on a self generating approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5,
2497–2517, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005</a>, 2005. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Ausloos, P.: The photolysis of alkyl esters, Can. J. Chem., 36, 383–392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/v58-054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/v58-054</a>, 1958.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Badawy, T., Williamson, J., and Xu, H.: Laminar burning characteristics of ethyl propionate, ethyl butyrate,
ethyl acetate, gasoline and ethanol fuels, Fuel, 183, 627–640, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.087" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.06.087</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Baeza-Romero, M. T., Glowacki, D. R., Blitz, M. A., Heard, D. E., Pilling, M. J., Rickard, A. R., and
Seakins, P. W.: A combined experimental and theoretical study of the reaction between methylglyoxal and OH/OD radical:
OH regeneration, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 9, 4114–4128, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/B702916K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/B702916K</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Barba, C., Beno, N., Guichard, E., and Thomas-Danguin, T.: Selecting odorant compounds to enhance sweet
flavor perception by gas chromatography/olfactometry-associated taste (GC/O-AT), Food Chem., 257, 172–181,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.152</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Bicas, J. L., Molina, G., Dionísio, A. P., Barros, F. F. C., Wagner, R., Maróstica, M. R., and
Pastore, G. M.: Volatile constituents of exotic fruits from Brazil, Food Res. Int., 44, 1843–1855,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.01.012</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Blitz, M. A., Guy, P., Shannon, R., and Seakins, P. W.: Rate Coefficients and Branching Ratios for the
Reaction of the OH Radical with Formic Acid under Low-Temperature Combustion Conditions and the Fate of the HOCO
Product, J. Phys. Chem. A, 129, 6437–6450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c01814" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c01814</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boelens, H., Haring, H. G., and Takken, H. J.: The Influence of Molecular-Structure on Olfactive Quality (a Quantitative Approach), Chem. Ind., 1, 26–30, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Braure, T., Bedjanian, Y., Romanias, M. N., Morin, J., Riffault, V., Tomas, A., and Coddeville, P.:
Experimental Study of the Reactions of Limonene with OH and OD Radicals: Kinetics and Products, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118,
9482–9490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507180g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp507180g</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Calvert, J., Mellouki, A., Orlando, J., Pilling, M., and Wallington, T.: Mechanisms of Atmospheric
Oxidation of the Oxygenates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1634 pp., ISBN 978-0-19-976707-6, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Carslaw, N. and Shaw, D.: Secondary product creation potential (SPCP): a metric for assessing the potential
impact of indoor air pollution on human health, Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts, 21, 1313–1322,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00140A" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C9EM00140A</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Caswell, L. R., Howard, M. F., and Onisto, T. M.: Solvent and substituent effects upon the <i>n</i> → <i>π</i>*
transition of aliphatic carboxylic acids and esters, J. Org. Chem., 41, 3312–3316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00882a023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00882a023</a>, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Chaturvedi, S., Kumar, A., Singh, V., Chakraborty, B., Kumar, R., and Min, L.: Recent Advancement in
Organic Aerosol Understanding: a Review of Their Sources, Formation, and Health Impacts, Water Air Soil Poll.,
234, 750, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06772-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-023-06772-0</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, I.-Y., Chang, C.-W., Fittschen, C., and Luo, P.-L.: Accurate Kinetic Studies of
OH + HO<sub>2</sub> Radical–Radical Reaction through Direct Measurement of Precursor and Radical Concentrations
with High-Resolution Time-Resolved Dual-Comb Spectroscopy, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 15, 3733–3739,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00494" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.4c00494</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Closson, W. D. and Haug, Pat.: The Effects of Solvent and Structure on the Low Intensity (<i>n</i> → <i>π</i>*)
Electronic Transition of Carboxylate Esters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 86, 2384–2389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01066a018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01066a018</a>, 1964.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Cometto, P. M., Daële, V., Idir, M., Lane, S. I., and Mellouki, A.: Reaction Rate Coefficients of OH
Radicals and Cl Atoms with Ethyl Propanoate, n-Propyl Propanoate, Methyl 2-Methylpropanoate, and Ethyl
<i>n</i>-Butanoate, J. Phys. Chem. A, 113, 10745–10752, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9061708" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9061708</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Doner, A. C., Christianson, M. G., Davis, J. C., Koritzke, A. L., Larsson, A., Frandsen, K., and
Rotavera, B.: Vacuum-ultraviolet absorption cross-sections of functionalized cyclic hydrocarbons: Six-membered rings,
J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 236, 106603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106603" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2019.106603</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       D'Souza Metcalf, J., Winkless, R. K., Robinson, A., Smith, S. C., Rickard, A. R., and Dillon, T. J.:
Practical atmospheric photochemical kinetics for undergraduate teaching and research, RSC Sustain., 3, 5146–5154,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D5SU00681C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D5SU00681C</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       El-Nahas, A. M., Navarro, M. V., Simmie, J. M., Bozzelli, J. W., Curran, H. J., Dooley, S., and
Metcalfe, W.: Enthalpies of Formation, Bond Dissociation Energies and Reaction Paths for the Decomposition of Model
Biofuels: Ethyl Propanoate and Methyl Butanoate, J. Phys. Chem. A, 111, 3727–3739, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp067413s" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp067413s</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       El-Nahas, A. M., Heikal, L. A., Mangood, A. H., and El-Shereefy, E.-S. E.: Structures and Energetics of
Unimolecular Thermal Degradation of Isopropyl Butanoate as a Model Biofuel: Density Functional Theory and Ab Initio
Studies, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 7996–8002, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103397f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp103397f</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Faxon, C. B. and Allen, D. T.: Chlorine chemistry in urban atmospheres: a review, Environ. Chem., 10,
221–233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN13026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN13026</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Ferrari, C., Roche, A., Jacob, V., Foster, P., and Baussand, P.: Kinetics of the reaction of OH radicals
with a series of esters under simulated conditions at 295&thinsp;K, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 28, 609–614,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1996)28:8&lt;609::AID-KIN6&gt;3.0.CO;2-Z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4601(1996)28:8&lt;609::AID-KIN6&gt;3.0.CO;2-Z</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R.,
Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Li, X., Caricato, M., Marenich, A. V., Bloino, J.,
Janesko, B. G., Gomperts, R., Mennucci, B., Hratchian, H. P., Ortiz, J. V., Izmaylov, A. F., Sonnenberg, J. L.,
Williams-Young, D., Ding, F., Lipparini, F., Egidi, F., Goings, J., Peng, B., Petrone, A., Henderson, T.,
Ranasinghe, D., Zakrzewski, V. G., Gao, J., Rega, N., Zheng, G., Liang, W., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K.,
Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Throssell, K.,
Montgomery, J. A., Jr., Peralta, J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M. J., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E. N., Kudin, K. N.,
Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T. A., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A. P., Burant, J. C.,
Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Adamo, C., Cammi, R., Ochterski, J. W.,
Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B., and Fox, D. J.: Gaussian 16, Revision C.02, Gaussian Inc.,
Wallingford CT,  <a href="https://gaussian.com/gaussian16/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 30 June 2026), 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Galano, A. and Raúl Alvarez-Idaboy, J.: Atmospheric Reactions of Oxygenated Volatile Organic
Compounds&thinsp;+&thinsp;OH Radicals: Role of Hydrogen-Bonded Intermediates and Transition States, in: Advances in Quantum
Chemistry, edited by: Goodsite, M. E. and Johnson, M. S., vol. 55, Academic Press, 245–274,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3276(07)00212-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3276(07)00212-2</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Gour, N. K., Deka, R. C., Singh, H. J., and Mishra, B. K.: Theoretical study on the gas-phase reactions of
ethyl butyrate with OH radicals at 298&thinsp;K, Monatsh. Chem., 145, 1759–1767, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-014-1255-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00706-014-1255-0</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Greiner, N. R.: Hydroxyl Radical Kinetics by Kinetic Spectroscopy, VI. Reactions with Alkanes in the Range
300–500°&thinsp;K, J. Chem. Phys., 53, 1070–1076, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674099</a>, 1970.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Hong, Z., Cook, R. D., Davidson, D. F., and Hanson, R. K.: A Shock Tube Study of
OH + H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> → H<sub>2</sub>O + HO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> + M → 2 OH + M using
Laser Absorption of H<sub>2</sub>O and OH, J. Phys. Chem. A, 114, 5718–5727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp100204z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp100204z</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Hoyle, C. R., Myhre, G., Berntsen, T. K., and Isaksen, I. S. A.: Anthropogenic influence on SOA and the
resulting radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2715–2728, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2715-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2715-2009</a>, 2009. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Ifang, S., Benter, T., and Barnes, I.: Reactions of Cl atoms with alkyl esters: kinetic, mechanism and
atmospheric implications, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 22, 4820–4832, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2913-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-2913-9</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Jenkin, M. E., Derwent, R. G., and Wallington, T. J.: Photochemical ozone creation potentials for volatile
organic compounds: Rationalization and estimation, Atmos. Environ., 163, 128–137,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.05.024</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Jenkin, M. E., Valorso, R., Aumont, B., Rickard, A. R., and Wallington, T. J.: Estimation of rate
coefficients and branching ratios for gas-phase reactions of OH with aliphatic organic compounds for use in automated
mechanism construction, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9297–9328, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9297-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9297-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Kim, Y.-H., Kim, K.-H., Szulejko, J. E., and Parker, D.: Quantitative Analysis of Fragrance and Odorants
Released from Fresh and Decaying Strawberries, Sensors, 13, 7939–7978, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s130607939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/s130607939</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Klepeis, N. E., Nelson, W. C., Ott, W. R., Robinson, J. P., Tsang, A. M., Switzer, P., Behar, J. V.,
Hern, S. C., and Engelmann, W. H.: The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing
exposure to environmental pollutants, J. Expo. Sci. Env. Epid., 11, 231–252, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500165</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Knothe, G. and Steidley, K. R.: Fatty Acid Alkyl Esters as Solvents: Evaluation of the Kauri-Butanol
Value. Comparison to Hydrocarbons, Dimethyl Diesters, and Other Oxygenates, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 4177–4182,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ie1023172" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ie1023172</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kraft, P., Bajgrowicz, J. A., Denis, C., and Fráter, G.: Odds and Trends: Recent Developments in the Chemistry of Odorants, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 39, 2980–3010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20000901)39:17%3C2980::AID-ANIE2980%3E3.0.CO;2-%23" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-3773(20000901)39:17%3C2980::AID-ANIE2980%3E3.0.CO;2-%23</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Kwok, E. S. C. and Atkinson, R.: Estimation of hydroxyl radical reaction rate constants for gas-phase
organic compounds using a structure-reactivity relationship: An update, Atmos. Environ., 29, 1685–1695,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00069-B" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00069-B</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Labbe, D., Rytz, A., Morgenegg, C., Ali, S., and Martin, N.: Subthreshold Olfactory Stimulation Can Enhance
Sweetness, Chem. Senses, 32, 205–214, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl040</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Langer, S., Ljungström, E., and Wängberg, I.: Rates of reaction between the nitrate radical and
some aliphatic esters, J. Chem. Soc. Farad. T., 89, 425–431, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/FT9938900425" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/FT9938900425</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Lary, D. J. and Shallcross, D. E.: Central role of carbonyl compounds in atmospheric
chemistry, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 19771–19778, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901184" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901184</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Lelieveld, J., Dentener, F. J., Peters, W., and Krol, M. C.: On the role of hydroxyl radicals in the
self-cleansing capacity of the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2337–2344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2337-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2337-2004</a>,
2004. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Lelieveld, J., Butler, T. M., Crowley, J. N., Dillon, T. J., Fischer, H., Ganzeveld, L., Harder, H.,
Lawrence, M. G., Martinez, M., Taraborrelli, D., and Williams, J.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a
tropical forest, Nature, 452, 737–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06870</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Lelieveld, J., Gromov, S., Pozzer, A., and Taraborrelli, D.: Global tropospheric hydroxyl distribution,
budget and reactivity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12477–12493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12477-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Liang, P., Mu, Y., Daële, V., and Mellouki, A.: Rate Coefficients for Reactions of OH and Cl with
Esters, ChemPhysChem, 11, 4097–4102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000262" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201000262</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Link, M. F., Shore, A., Hamadani, B. H., and Poppendieck, D.: Ozone Generation from a Germicidal
Ultraviolet Lamp with Peak Emission at 222&thinsp;nm, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 10, 675–679,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00318" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00318</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Ludwig, W., Brandt, B., Friedrichs, G., and Temps, F.: Kinetics of the Reaction
C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>5</sub> + HO<sub>2</sub> by Time-Resolved Mass Spectrometry, J. Phys. Chem. A, 110, 3330–3337,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0557464" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0557464</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Mapelli, C., Schleicher, J. V., Hawtin, A., Rankine, C. D., Whiting, F. C., Byrne, F., McElroy, C. R.,
Roman, C., Arsene, C., Olariu, R. I., Bejan, I. G., and Dillon, T. J.: Atmospheric breakdown chemistry of the new
“green” solvent 2,2,5,5-tetramethyloxolane via gas-phase reactions with OH and Cl radicals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22,
14589–14602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14589-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14589-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Mapelli, C., Donnelly, J. K., Hogan, Ú. E., Rickard, A. R., Robinson, A. T., Byrne, F., McElroy, C. R.,
Curchod, B. F. E., Hollas, D., and Dillon, T. J.: Atmospheric oxidation of new “green” solvents – Part 2: methyl
pivalate and pinacolone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7767–7779, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7767-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7767-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
McMillan, V.: Photochemistry, personal communication to J. G. Calvert, J. N. Pitts Jr., John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, p. 429, 1966.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Mellouki, A., Le Bras, G., and Sidebottom, H.: Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Oxidation of Oxygenated
Organic Compounds in the Gas Phase, Chem. Rev., 103, 5077–5096, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020526x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020526x</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Mutzel, A., Poulain, L., Berndt, T., Iinuma, Y., Rodigast, M., Böge, O., Richters, S., Spindler, G.,
Sipilä, M., Jokinen, T., Kulmala, M., and Herrmann, H.: Highly Oxidized Multifunctional Organic Compounds Observed
in Tropospheric Particles: A Field and Laboratory Study, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 7754–7761,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00885" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00885</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Naito, K., Sawadaishi, K., and Kawasaki, M.: Photobiochemical mechanisms of biomolecules relevant to
germicidal ultraviolet irradiation at 222 and 254&thinsp;nm, Sci. Rep., 12, 18217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22969-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22969-5</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Nakashima, K., Uchida-Kai, K., Koyanagi, M., and Kanda, Y.: Solvent Effects on the Intensities of Forbidden
Bands of Molecules. Absorption Spectra of Acetone and Cyclopentanone, B. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 55, 415–419,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.55.415" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.55.415</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       NCAR: Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible (TUV) Radiation Model by the National Center for Atmospheric
Research (NCAR), v5.3, web version of model,  <a href="https://www.acom.ucar.edu/Models/TUV/Interactive_TUV/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 28 Nov 2025), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Nematollahi, N., Doronila, A., Mornane, P. J., Duan, A., Kolev, S. D., and Steinemann, A.: Volatile
chemical emissions from fragranced baby products, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 11, 785–790,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0593-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-018-0593-1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Notario, A., Le Bras, G., and Mellouki, A.: Absolute Rate Constants for the Reactions of Cl Atoms with a
Series of Esters, J. Phys. Chem. A, 102, 3112–3117, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980416n" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp980416n</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Onel, L., Blitz, M. A., and Seakins, P. W.: Direct Determination of the Rate Coefficient for the Reaction
of OH Radicals with Monoethanol Amine (MEA) from 296–510&thinsp;K, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 3, 853–856,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jz300200c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jz300200c</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Pandey, N., Mehata, M. S., Pant, S., and Tewari, N.: Structural, Electronic and NLO Properties of
6-aminoquinoline: A DFT/TD-DFT Study, J. Fluoresc., 31, 1719–1729, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-021-02788-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10895-021-02788-z</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Peng, Z., Day, D. A., Symonds, G. A., Jenks, O. J., Stark, H., Handschy, A. V., de Gouw, J. A., and
Jimenez, J. L.: Significant Production of Ozone from Germicidal UV Lights at 222&thinsp;nm, Environ. Sci. Tech. Let., 10,
668–674, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00314" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00314</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Potter, D. G., Wiseman, S., Blitz, M. A., and Seakins, P. W.: Laser Photolysis Kinetic Study of OH Radical
Reactions with Methyl <i>tert</i>-Butyl Ether and Trimethyl Orthoformate under Conditions Relevant to Low
Temperature Combustion: Measurements of Rate Coefficients and OH Recycling, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 9701–9711,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b09122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b09122</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Potter, D. G., Blitz, M. A., and Seakins, P. W.: A generic method for determining R + O<sub>2</sub>
rate parameters via OH regeneration, Chem. Phys. Lett., 730, 213–219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.06.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.06.014</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Ramya, C. B. and Rajakumar, B.: Cl atom initiated tropospheric chemistry of ethyl butyrate,
Chem. Phys. Lett., 731, 136594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.136594" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2019.136594</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Rao, P. D., Husile, N., Strasser, A. A., and Wise, P. M.: Pilot Experiment: the Effect of Added Flavorants
on the Taste and Pleasantness of Mixtures of Glycerol and Propylene Glycol, Chemosens. Percept., 11, 1–9,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-017-9231-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-017-9231-9</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Ravishankara, A. R.: Are chlorine atoms significant tropospheric free radicals?, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,
106, 13639–13640, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907089106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907089106</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       Robertson, N. C. K., Onel, L., Blitz, M. A., Shannon, R., Stone, D., Seakins, P. W., Robertson, S. H.,
Kühn, C., Pazdera, T. M., and Olzmann, M.: Temperature-Dependent, Site-Specific Rate Coefficients for the Reaction
of OH (OD) with Methyl Formate Isotopologues via Experimental and Theoretical Studies, J. Phys. Chem. A, 128,
5028–5040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c02524</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Shannon, R. J., Caravan, R. L., Blitz, M. A., and Heard, D. E.: A combined experimental and theoretical
study of reactions between the hydroxyl radical and oxygenated hydrocarbons relevant to astrochemical environments,
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 16, 3466–3478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP54664K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C3CP54664K</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Shaw, J. T., Rickard, A. R., Newland, M. J., and Dillon, T. J.: Rate coefficients for reactions of OH with
aromatic and aliphatic volatile organic compounds determined by the multivariate relative rate technique,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9725–9736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9725-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9725-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Śmialek, M. A., Łabuda, M., Guthmuller, J., Hubin-Franskin, M.-J., Delwiche, J., Hoffmann, S. V.,
Jones, N. C., Mason, N. J., and Limão-Vieira, P.: Electronic state spectroscopy by high-resolution vacuum
ultraviolet photoabsorption, He(I) photoelectron spectroscopy and ab initio calculations of ethyl acetate,
Eur. Phys. J. D, 70, 138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2016-70239-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2016-70239-9</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Sosa-Moguel, O., Pino, J. A., Sauri-Duch, E., and Cuevas-Glory, L.: Characterization of odor-active
compounds in three varieties of ciruela (<i>Spondias purpurea</i> L.) fruit, Int. J. Food Prop., 21, 1008–1016,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1479858" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2018.1479858</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
       Tang, X., Zhang, Y., Wang, L., Sun, C., Wang, L., and Huang, Z.: Excited-state antioxidant capacity of
Flavonoids based on solvent effect: A TD-DFT study, J. Mol. Liq., 404, 124973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124973" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2024.124973</a>,
2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
       The Good Scents Company Information System: <a href="https://www.thegoodscentscompany.com/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 20
January 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Uhde, E. and Schulz, N.: Impact of room fragrance products on indoor air quality, Atmos. Environ., 106,
492–502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.020</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       US Environmental Protection Agency: EPI Suite™ Version 1.0.1-beta, Module
MPBPVP™,  <a href="https://episuite.dev/#/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 January 2026), 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Wallington, T. J., Dagaut, P., Liu, R., and Kurylo, M. J.: The gas phase reactions of hydroxyl radicals
with a series of esters over the temperature range 240–440&thinsp;K, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 20, 177–186,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550200210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550200210</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, X., Jacob, D. J., Eastham, S. D., Sulprizio, M. P., Zhu, L., Chen, Q., Alexander, B., Sherwen, T.,
Evans, M. J., Lee, B. H., Haskins, J. D., Lopez-Hilfiker, F. D., Thornton, J. A., Huey, G. L., and Liao, H.: The role
of chlorine in global tropospheric chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3981–4003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3981-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3981-2019</a>,
2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
       Weschler, C. J. and Carslaw, N.: Indoor Chemistry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 2419–2428,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06387" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b06387</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Williams, D. C., O'Rji, L. N., and Stone, D. A.: Kinetics of the reactions of OH radicals with selected
acetates and other esters under simulated atmospheric conditions, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 25, 539–548,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550250704" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/kin.550250704</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
       Wolkoff, P., Clausen, P. A., Jensen, B., Nielsen, G. D., and Wilkins, C. K.: Are We Measuring the Relevant
Indoor Pollutants?, Indoor Air, 7, 92–106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00003.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.1997.t01-2-00003.x</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
       Wollenhaupt, M., Carl, S. A., Horowitz, A., and Crowley, J. N.: Rate Coefficients for Reaction of OH with
Acetone between 202 and 395&thinsp;K, J. Phys. Chem. A, 104, 2695–2705, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993738f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993738f</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
       Wong, J. P. S., Carslaw, N., Zhao, R., Zhou, S., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Observations and impacts of bleach
washing on indoor chlorine chemistry, Indoor Air, 27, 1082–1090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12402" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12402</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
       Xiao, Z., Zhang, S., Zhu, J., Niu, Y., Xiong, W., and Chen, F.: Identification of key aromas of grapefruit
juice and study of their contributions to the enhancement of sweetness perception, Eur. Food Res. Technol., 249,
537–551, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04151-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-022-04151-3</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
       Xiao, Z., Hu, Y., Niu, Y., Zhang, J., and Yang, B.: Five representative esters and aldehydes from fruits
can enhance sweet perception, LWT, 194, 115804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115804" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2024.115804</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
       Xu, Y., Minhazul, K. A. H. M., and Li, X.: The occurrence, enzymatic production, and application of ethyl
butanoate, an important flavor constituent, Flavour Frag. J., 35, 601–615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3613" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3613</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
       Yeoman, A. M., Shaw, M., Carslaw, N., Murrells, T., Passant, N., and Lewis, A. C.: Simplified speciation
and atmospheric volatile organic compound emission rates from non-aerosol personal care products, Indoor Air, 30,
459–472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12652</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
       Young, C. J., Washenfelder, R. A., Edwards, P. M., Parrish, D. D., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C.,
Mielke, L. H., Osthoff, H. D., Tsai, C., Pikelnaya, O., Stutz, J., Veres, P. R., Roberts, J. M., Griffith, S.,
Dusanter, S., Stevens, P. S., Flynn, J., Grossberg, N., Lefer, B., Holloway, J. S., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B.,
Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., and Brown, S. S.: Chlorine as a primary radical: evaluation of methods to understand its
role in initiation of oxidative cycles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 3427–3440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3427-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3427-2014</a>,
2014. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, H., Kang, S., Li, J., Li, Z., Chang, J., Xu, Y., Max Lu, G., and Sun, C.: Near zero-waste biofuel
production from bioderived polyhydroxybutyrate, Fuel, 286, 119405, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119405</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
