<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-8601-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Global methane emission estimates from a dual-isotope inversion: new constraints from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub></article-title><alt-title>Global methane emission estimates from a dual-isotope inversion</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Dasgupta</surname><given-names>Bibhasvata</given-names></name>
          <email>bdasgupta03@gmail.com</email><email>bdasgupta@uu.nl</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9324-8122</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Pandey</surname><given-names>Sudhanshu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Houweling</surname><given-names>Sander</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6189-1009</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Menoud</surname><given-names>Malika</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-2684</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>van der Veen</surname><given-names>Carina</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Miller</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8630-1610</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Riddell-Young</surname><given-names>Ben</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Englund Michel</surname><given-names>Sylvia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Sperlich</surname><given-names>Peter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1455-0903</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Morimoto</surname><given-names>Shinji</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7858-5430</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Fujita</surname><given-names>Ryo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8559-6012</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Platt</surname><given-names>Stephen</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Groot Zwaaftink</surname><given-names>Christine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4286-5438</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" deceased="yes" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Levin</surname><given-names>Ingeborg</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Veidt</surname><given-names>Cordelia</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Lund Myhre</surname><given-names>Cathrine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3587-5926</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff12">
          <name><surname>Woolley Maisch</surname><given-names>Ceres</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-145X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>Fisher</surname><given-names>Rebecca</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9262-5467</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>G. Nisbet</surname><given-names>Euan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>France</surname><given-names>James</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8785-1240</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Moss</surname><given-names>Rowena</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff13">
          <name><surname>Warwick</surname><given-names>Nicola</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Röckmann</surname><given-names>Thomas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-8968</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht (IMAU), Utrecht University,  Utrecht, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Global Monitoring Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, 80205, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>New Zealand Institute for Earth Science Ltd., 301 Evans Bay Parade, Wellington 6023, Aotearoa New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Center for Atmospheric and Oceanic Studies, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Institut für Umweltphysik, Heidelberg University, INF 229, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>NILU, P.O. Box 100, 2027 Kjeller, Norway</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Centre of Climate, Ocean and Atmosphere, Department of Earth Sciences, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1EW, UK</institution>
        </aff><author-comment content-type="deceased"><p/></author-comment>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Bibhasvata Dasgupta (bdasgupta03@gmail.com, bdasgupta@uu.nl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>8601</fpage><lpage>8616</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>11</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>5</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>3</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Bibhasvata Dasgupta et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e389">Methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) is a potent greenhouse gas; however, the causes of its growth since 2006 are a subject of debate. While measurements of CH<sub>4</sub> mole fraction and carbon isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>) have been extensively used to investigate the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget, the hydrogen isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>) remains underutilised despite its unique sensitivity to source types and oxidation processes. Here, we assimilate a newly harmonised 35-year dataset of dual isotope measurements from high-latitude monitoring stations in both hemispheres within a two-box Bayesian inversion to quantify global CH<sub>4</sub> sources and sinks. The model integrates prior emissions from five source categories based on global bottom-up inventories. Methane removal processes are represented by sink-specific kinetic isotope effects as tropospheric and stratospheric loss, and soil uptake.</p>

      <p id="d2e465">We find that the inclusion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> improves the model's ability to constrain emission apportionment between biogenic and thermogenic sources, particularly for fossil fuel emissions during the late 1990s and early 2000s, which affects CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime estimate. CH<sub>4</sub> increase post-2006 is driven mainly by rising wetland emissions, while fossil-fuel growth is modest, biomass burning declines, and agriculture and waste make smaller, regionalised contributions. The optimised inversion results favour a strong <sup>13</sup>C kinetic isotope effect in total tropospheric CH<sub>4</sub> removal and a net shortening of the NH lifetime of CH<sub>4</sub> by 0.2 years. This study demonstrates the added value of incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> into inverse modelling frameworks and underscores the importance of long-term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> measurements for advancing our understanding of CH<sub>4</sub> biogeochemistry and its role in the global carbon cycle.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>European Association of National Metrology Institutes</funding-source>
<award-id>24GRD03 – MetHIR</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e581">Quantification of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions from various source categories is critical for understanding the drivers of the ongoing climate change and identifying opportunities for mitigation. Two complementary approaches are commonly employed: bottom-up emission inventories, which aggregate source-specific activity data and emission factors, and top-down inverse modelling, which infers emissions from atmospheric mole fraction and increasingly includes isotopic measurements. Over the past decade, concerted efforts to reconcile these methods have considerably reduced overall uncertainty in the CH<sub>4</sub> budget (Kirschke et al., 2013; Saunois et al., 2016, 2020, 2025). Nevertheless, the drivers of the observed variations in atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> remain a topic of scientific debate. Global atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> mole fractions stabilised during 2000–2006, a period attributed to a balance between emissions and atmospheric removal processes (Bousquet et al., 2011; Basu et al., 2022). However, since 2007, atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations have risen markedly, with multiple hypotheses proposed to explain this renewed growth. These include increased biogenic emissions from wetlands and agriculture, enhanced fossil fuel extraction and usage, and changes in atmospheric removal processes – most notably variations in the abundance of tropospheric hydroxyl radicals (OH) (Schwietzke et al., 2016; Worden et al., 2017; Houweling et al., 2017; Turner et al., 2017; Nisbet et al., 2019; Lan et al., 2021; Michel et al., 2024). However, the relative contributions of these factors and their change with time remain poorly constrained.</p>
      <p id="d2e629">Measurements of the carbon isotopic composition of methane, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, have long been incorporated into top-down models to distinguish between biogenic and thermogenic sources (Mikaloff Fletcher et al., 2004; Bousquet et al., 2006; 2011; Monteil et al., 2011; Rigby et al., 2012; Schaefer et al., 2016; Nisbet et al., 2016). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> is sensitive to variations in organic substrate type (e.g., C<sub>3</sub> vs. C<sub>4</sub> vegetation) and formation pathways (e.g., biogenic vs. thermogenic vs. pyrogenic), providing distinct isotopic signatures for different source categories (Bellisario et al., 1999; Hornibrook and Bowes, 2007; Hornibrook, 2009). More recently, hydrogen isotopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>) have shown promise as an additional constraint due to their sensitivity to both source water isotopic composition and kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) during oxidation (Tyler et al., 2007; Warwick et al., 2016; Douglas et al., 2021; Riddell-Young et al., 2025). Studies incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> reveal that carbon and hydrogen isotope tracers can yield divergent source apportionments, underscoring the need for a dual-isotope approach. This finding is based on source characterisation studies that produce isotopic signatures (Fujita et al., 2020, 2025) and attribution studies that use dual-isotope constraints to partition emissions (Riddell-Young et al., 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e723">We employ a two-box Bayesian inversion model (Fig. 1) coupled with a discrete parameter tuning (DPT) strategy to a 35-year-long global CH<sub>4</sub> isotope dataset that was recently synthesised from measurements at high northern and southern latitude stations (Dasgupta et al., 2025a), to evaluate the added value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> in constraining the global CH<sub>4</sub> budget. Specifically, we investigate whether using both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> improves the separation of fossil versus biogenic CH<sub>4</sub> sources more than using either single-isotope or CH<sub>4</sub> mole-fraction-only inversions. In addition, we explore how uncertainties in source isotopic signatures, sink lifetimes, and KIEs influence inversion outcomes. Lastly, we evaluate the additional constraints that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> provides on temporal variations in the global CH<sub>4</sub> sink.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e844">Schematic of the two-box inversion framework used to simulate and optimise atmospheric methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CH<sub>4</sub>)), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>. Methane is emitted as three isotopologues (<sup>12</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>, <sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>, <sup>12</sup>CH<sub>3</sub>D) from five source categories (wetlands, agriculture, biomass burning, fossil fuels, and waste), each with characteristic emission rates (Tg yr<sup>−1</sup>) and isotopic signatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D). These emissions are partitioned between the northern and southern hemispheres and corrected for intra-hemispheric gradients and interhemispheric exchange. Methane is removed by three sink processes (tropospheric loss, stratospheric loss, and soil uptake), each parameterised by isotopologue- and process-specific lifetimes. The resulting atmospheric tracer fields are compared with measurements from 10 high-latitude monitoring stations (yellow labels) spanning both hemispheres, following the network described by Dasgupta et al. (2025a). The model is inverted to optimise source strengths and hemisphere-specific sink lifetimes weighted with prior uncertainties, yielding posterior emissions and lifetime estimates that best reproduce observed mole fractions and isotopic trends.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Method</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Two-box model setup</title>
      <p id="d2e1006">The mole fraction and isotopic composition of CH<sub>4</sub> are modelled using a two-box model with the boxes representing the Northern Hemisphere (NH) and Southern Hemisphere (SH) (Fig. 1). Hemisphere-specific source fluxes are compiled from six bottom-up inventories and aggregated into five source categories: agriculture, wetlands, pyrogenic, fossil fuels, and waste (Table S1 and Fig. S1 in the Supplement). Please note, “fossil fuel” and “thermogenic” emissions are used interchangeably to refer to CH<sub>4</sub> from fuel exploration, oil refineries, chemical processes, and power generation as compiled from EDGAR (Table S1). Pyrogenic emissions are treated as a separate category. CH<sub>4</sub> sinks are parameterised by sink-specific lifetimes for removal by troposphere, stratosphere, and deposition to soils, respectively. We set the inter-hemispheric exchange time to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75 year, determined from SF<sub>6</sub> inversion and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitivity tests (see Fig. S5). The intra-hemispheric latitudinal gradients in CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> are corrected for using measurement stations at different latitudes provided by the NOAA network (Fig. S4). This correction accounts for the spatial variability within each hemisphere that cannot be explicitly resolved in the two-box framework, ensuring that model outputs are comparable to observations from individual atmospheric stations. Given the 2-box setup, global-scale source totals and growth trends are expected to be robust, whereas hemispheric attribution is more sensitive to structural assumptions, including interhemispheric exchange time and prior uncertainty weighting (see Sect. 4.4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Harmonised long-term atmospheric timeseries</title>
      <p id="d2e1121">Our atmospheric dataset comprises time series data for 6 CH<sub>4</sub> tracers: mole fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CH<sub>4</sub>); NH and SH: 1983–2024), carbon isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>; NH: 1994–2024; SH: 1988–2024), and hydrogen isotopic composition (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>; NH: 1992–2024; SH: 1988–2024) of CH<sub>4</sub>, each of them being a merged dataset from stations at high northern and southern latitudes (Dasgupta et al., 2025b). We extrapolate the time series back to 1980 and forward to 2025 (Fig. S2). A 13-year spin-up is applied to ensure that inversion results are independent of initial conditions, and a 3-year spin-down allows smooth convergence back to priors (Fig. S3). Therefore, the effective “analysis period” ranges from 1994 to 2022.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Source and Sink Isotopic Signatures</title>
      <p id="d2e1204">Source isotopic signatures for the 5 categories are averages from the global isotope database (Sherwood et al., 2017; Menoud et al., 2022) and weighted by emission rates (Table S2). CH<sub>4</sub> sinks include tropospheric OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl, a combined stratospheric sink including OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl, and soil uptake. Each sink is assigned a kinetic isotope effect (KIE) based on Cantrell et al. (1990), Saueressig et al. (1995, 1996, 2001), Röckmann et al. (2011), and Fujita et al. (2020). We use their reported fractionation factors to set effective KIEs for the model's three sink categories: tropospheric (KIE <sup>13</sup>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0066; D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.317), stratospheric (KIE <sup>13</sup>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0144; D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.133), and soil (KIE <sup>13</sup>C <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0201; D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0825) sinks.</p>
      <p id="d2e1319">Sensitivity tests were performed where prior flux uncertainties (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–50 %) and observational error bounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CH<sub>4</sub>): 1 ppb <sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>: 0.1–0.01 ppb; CH<sub>3</sub>D: 0.005–0.001 ppb) were systematically varied. Reducing the prior error below 30 % increased interannual variability in posterior fluxes but degraded isotopic fits, as the inversion over-relied on the priors (Lan et al., 2021). Lowering <sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> observational error to 0.001 ppb produced near-perfect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> fits but worsened <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> agreement, whereas balancing errors at 1, 0.01, and 0.001 ppb yielded improved simultaneous fits. These findings highlight the trade-off between prior confidence and observational weighing in multivariate inversions and are further explored in “error-scaled” inversion scenarios (Sect. 3.3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Bayesian Inversion System</title>
      <p id="d2e1439">The prior hemisphere-specific emissions for 1980–2025 (Sect. 2.3) are optimised using a Bayesian inversion system, as described in Sect. S7 in the Supplement. The inversion algorithm modifies monthly source fluxes and sink losses so that 6 modelled tracers evolve toward the observations while still remaining constrained by priors. For all results presented in Sect. 3.2–3.3, we use a fixed prior lifetime (Prather et al., 2012; Myhre et al., 2014), but we also test time-varying CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime scenarios derived from CAMS TM5 inversions (Fig. S6). The inversion is performed in two sequential steps. First, we perform a CH<sub>4</sub>-only inversion to estimate the emissions and the aggregate sink that match the observed hemispheric CH<sub>4</sub> mole fraction, providing a consistent starting state for the isotopologue ratio calculations. Second, we run an iterative Gauss–Newton inversion jointly constrained by CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> to refine the total budget and its allocation across source categories (see Sect. S7). The two-box model is adjusted to run with different combinations of the three tracers by selecting which isotopologues to include in the second inversion step and their associated observational uncertainties (Figs. 2, 3).</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1517">Observed (black) and posterior (coloured) time series of CH<sub>4</sub> mole fraction <bold>(a)</bold>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> <bold>(b)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> <bold>(c)</bold> in NH (circle) and SH (cross) for 3 inversion scenarios: (i) Dual Isotope, (ii) Carbon only, and (iii) Hydrogen only. Black circles represent the observed tracer values measured at SH firn air (Sapart et al., 2013). Grey shading indicates spin-up (1980–1993) and spin-down (2023–2024) periods; the unshaded region (1994–2022) is the analysis period.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1583">Prior (black, dotted) and posterior (coloured) total global emissions (Tg) for five emission categories <bold>(a–e)</bold> and total sink lifetime <bold>(f)</bold> values simulated by the two-box inversion for 3 inversion scenarios: (i) Dual Isotope, (ii) Carbon only, and (iii) Hydrogen only. Coloured bands corresponding to each inversion represent the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> error calculated from a 6-month moving window. Grey shading indicates spin-up (1980–1993) and spin-down (2023–2024) periods; the unshaded region (1994–2022) is the analysis period. The hemisphere-specific version of Fig. 3 is available in Sect. S12.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Discrete Parameter Tuning (DPT)</title>
      <p id="d2e1614">To optimise model inputs, including source isotopic signatures, sink KIEs, lifetimes, and observational-error estimates, we perform over 13 million individual inversions with perturbed prior parameter values (Table S3). Each run generates posterior source fluxes for which the 6 modelled tracers, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>(NH, SH)</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4 (NH, SH)</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4(NH, SH)</sub> are then compared to the observations via a tracer-weighted RMSE (root mean square error; see Sect. S8). We only retain scenarios where the mean normalised RMSE between modelled and observed tracers is less than 0.1 (Fig. S7) and identify the most frequently occurring prior values among these “successful” runs (Figs. S8, S9). These modal values constitute our DPT-optimised parameter set, and the aggregated posterior results represent the DPT ensemble run (Fig. 4).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e1716">Prior (black, dotted) and posterior (coloured; raw, 5-year moving average and uncertainty) emission rates for 5 source categories <bold>(a–e)</bold> and lifetime <bold>(f)</bold> computed from (i) ensemble mean of the DPT optimised runs filtered from sensitivity tests (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 RMSE) and (ii) error-scaled inversion for source and lifetime. Posterior fossil emissions are also compared with GAINS (green) emissions alongside the priors (EDGAR). Grey shading indicates spin-up (1980–1993) and spin-down (2023–2024) periods; the unshaded region (1994–2022) is the analysis period. The hemisphere-specific version of Fig. 4 is available in Sect. S12.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1738">The threshold of mean normalised RMSE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 is empirically motivated: as shown in Fig. S7b, over 92 % of all posterior-observation pairs across the six tracers fall below this value, confirming that retained runs reproduce the observations within their combined measurement and model uncertainty. In absolute terms, this corresponds to residuals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 ‰–0.07 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 ‰ for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>. Sensitivity tests with stricter or looser thresholds produce near-identical ensemble medians for global source trends.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Optimised Source Signatures and Sink Fractionations</title>
      <p id="d2e1815">By selecting the parameter combinations that minimise the mean normalised RMSE for all six tracers, we obtained robust, data-driven refinements to the input parameters. As shown in Table 1 and Fig. S8, most source signatures remained close to their priors. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, DPT-optimisation resulted in minor revisions to the wetland and agricultural source signatures in both hemispheres. A relatively larger adjustment was made to agricultural emission <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> in SH and to a lesser extent to agricultural and wetlands <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>. Both biogenic source signatures shifted toward the heavier end of the DPT-tested range, suggesting that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> data can be better matched by more enriched source signatures.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1894">Assigned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> values (‰) for each source category in the two-box model. Optimised values (‰) from DPT-ensemble. Optimised values (‰) from DPT-ensemble are in italics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Emission category</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> (SH)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> (NH)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> (SH)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> (NH)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wetlands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>58.3; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>58.2</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64.9; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>64.8</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>302; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>299</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>339; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>336</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Agriculture</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64.4; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>63.4</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>63.4; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>63.3</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>311; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>312</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>314; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>314</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pyrogenic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.3; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>22.3</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.4; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>22.4</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>213; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>213</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>183; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>183</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fossil fuels</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44.0; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>44.0</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44.0; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>44.0</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>192; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>192</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>191; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>191</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Waste</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54.5; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>54.5</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54.5; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>54.5</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>292; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>292</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>292; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula><italic>292</italic></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2411">The same DPT framework was applied to optimise the tropospheric KIEs (Table 2; Fig. S9). Tropospheric KIEs for OH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl oxidation were slightly revised from literature values (<sup>13</sup>C 1.0066 and D 1.317; Saunois et al., 2020) to 1.0068 (<sup>13</sup>C) and 1.313 (D). These optimised KIEs yield the best simultaneous fit to the trends in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>(NH, SH)</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub><sub>(NH, SH)</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4<sub>(NH, SH)</sub></sub>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2547">Fractionation factors used for different sink processes, based on previous literature, and using an average global temperature of 3.973 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.122 °C. Optimised values from DPT-ensemble. Optimised values (‰) from DPT-ensemble are in italics.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">CH<sub>4</sub> sink process </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><sup>13</sup>C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Reference</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">D</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">1.0054</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">Cantrell et al. (1990)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.313</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Saueressig et al. (2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Troposphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">Cl</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">1.0676</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">Saueressig et al. (1995)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">1.538</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6">Saueressig et al. (1996)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0066</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Saunois et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.317</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Saunois et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(OH: Cl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><italic>1.0068</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><italic>1.313</italic></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Stratosphere </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.01436</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Röckmann et al. (2011)<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.133</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Röckmann et al. (2011)<sup>a</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Soil </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.0201</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fujita et al. (2020)<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0825</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fujita et al. (2020)<sup>b</sup></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d2e2557"><sup>a</sup> Pseudo-KIE that account for the fractionation in the stratospheric sinks on atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> in the box model. See Sect. S9 for detailed calculations.<sup>b</sup> Based on Snover and Quay (2000), Tyler et al. (1994), and Reeburgh et al. (1997).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e2819">These fine-tuned (within physically realistic bounds) source fingerprints and sink kinetics improve the model's ability to reproduce observed isotopic trajectories.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Isotopic Constraints on the Inversion</title>
      <p id="d2e2830">Figures 2 and 3 compare the modelled and observed isotopic time series, along with their corresponding emission scenarios, highlighting the performance of the three inversion setups: dual-isotope (CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D), carbon-only (CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C), and hydrogen-only (CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D).</p>
      <p id="d2e2935">Figure 3 reveals marked differences in sectoral emission trajectories across the three isotopic inversion setups over the analysis period. Wetlands  (Fig. 3a) exhibit relatively stable emissions from 1994 to 2007 across all  three inversions, followed by a sustained increase through 2022. Mean emissions are 217.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.9 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (dual-isotope), 216.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.3 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (carbon-only), and 220.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.7 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (hydrogen-only), with a total growth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35.3, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32.6, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35.8 Tg across the analysis period, respectively (Table S4). Agricultural emissions (Fig. 3b) exhibit gradual increases throughout the analysis period, with mean values of 128.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (dual-isotope), 128.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (carbon-only), and 131.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (hydrogen-only), corresponding to growth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.8, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.9, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.8 Tg. Pyrogenic emissions (Fig. 3c) display high interannual variability but a general declining trend, decreasing from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 45 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> in the early 1990s to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 32 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> by 2022. Mean emissions are 39.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (dual-isotope), 39.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (carbon-only), and 38.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.4 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (hydrogen-only), with reductions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.6, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.1, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.3 Tg. Fossil fuel emissions (Fig. 3d) show the most pronounced divergence between inversion scenarios with and without <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>. The carbon-only inversion (110.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.7 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>28.7 Tg growth) displays steady increases throughout the period. The dual-isotope (108.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.9 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20.7 Tg) and hydrogen-only (108.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.4 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.2 Tg) inversions show elevated emissions in the early 1990s, a decrease through the late 1990s, and renewed growth from 2000 onward. Waste emissions (Fig. 3e) increase steadily with excellent agreement in temporal variation across all inversions: 80.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (dual-isotope, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.4 Tg), 79.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (carbon-only, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.8 Tg), and  79.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (hydrogen-only, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.1 Tg). Atmospheric lifetime (Fig. 3f) remains consistent at 9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years across all inversions, with higher temporal variations at the hemispheric scale than at the global scale.</p>
      <p id="d2e3350">The dual-isotope inversion achieves the best overall fit for both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> (Fig. S10). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, it shows a mean residual of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05 ‰ and a median of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 ‰, slightly better than the carbon-only run (mean  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.07 ‰, median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06 ‰). By contrast, the hydrogen-only inversion has larger residuals (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.29 ‰, median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.30 ‰), indicating a poorer fit. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>, the dual-isotope inversion again performs best (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.18 ‰, median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.09 ‰), followed by the hydrogen-only setup (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55 ‰, median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.47 ‰). The primary constraint from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> operates on the early-period fossil baseline rather than on tracer fit in the later period; by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2005, all inversions converge on a similar trajectory consistent with both isotopic records. The carbon-only inversion, lacking <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> data, has the largest residuals (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.74 ‰, median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.18 ‰), confirming that  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> alone cannot capture deuterium dynamics. These results demonstrate that the dual-isotope approach is the only setup capable of accurately matching both isotopic records, whereas the single-isotope inversions necessarily compromise the fit for the unconstrained tracer. Following this, we run 2 additional scenarios with both isotopes, i.e. DPT ensemble and error-scaled inversions, to fully gauge the implications of a dual isotopic constraint on the model.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Revised estimates of emissions and lifetime</title>
      <p id="d2e3571">We compare prior estimates with five inversion scenarios over 1994–2022 to assess how isotopic constraints re-estimate the methane budget (Table S4, Figs. 3–4). <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3576"><italic>Prior</italic>: bottom-up inventories with fixed 9-year lifetimes (Fig. 3; black).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3582"><italic>Carbon-only</italic>: CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> inversion using DPT-optimised parameters but omitting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> (Fig. 3; green).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3641"><italic>Hydrogen-only</italic>: CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> inversion using DPT-optimised parameters but omitting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> (Fig. 3; blue).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3700"><italic>Dual-isotope</italic> CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> inversion, <italic>using a fixed set</italic> of source signatures, sink KIEs, lifetimes, and observational-error estimates <italic>optimised a priori</italic> by our DPT framework. In other  words, it is a <italic>single</italic> inversion run that employs the best-guess parameter values from discrete parameter tuning (Fig. 3; red).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3775"><italic>DPT ensemble</italic> represents the mean of all inversion runs (over 13 million) whose posterior results achieve a mean normalised RMSE <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 against the six observed tracers. Rather than using only the modal parameter set, this scenario aggregates across the distribution of “successful” runs, thereby capturing the uncertainty and variability inherent in the parameter tuning process (Fig. 4; red).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3788"><italic>Error-scaled</italic>: dual-isotope inversion using DPT-optimised  parameters with emission uncertainties weighted by each source's contribution and tropospheric lifetime error tightened from 10 % to 9 % following sensitivity tests (Fig. 4; blue). Specifically, each source's prior uncertainty is scaled by (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is that source's fractional contribution to total global emissions. This prevents large sources (e.g., wetlands contributing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 % of total) from dominating the inversion solution space while allowing smaller sources (e.g., pyrogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 %) proportionally more flexibility.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e3833">Figure 4 compares prior emissions with two refined dual-isotope inversions: the DPT-ensemble and error-scaled scenarios. Wetlands (Fig. 4a) show temporal patterns similar to Fig. 3, with relatively stable emissions until <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  007, followed by sustained increases. The DPT-ensemble estimates mean emissions of 222.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.8 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> with growth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33.5 Tg, while the error-scaled inversion yields 220.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.3 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> with growth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31.5 Tg, both lower than the prior growth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30.1 Tg). Agricultural emissions (Fig. 4b) increase in both inversions. The DPT-ensemble (132.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.0 Tg growth) and error-scaled (129.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.8 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.7 Tg growth) scenarios both estimate lower growth than the prior (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.3 Tg). Pyrogenic emissions (Fig. 4c) decline from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> in 1994 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 31 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> by 2022, with high interannual variability. Mean emissions are 38.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (DPT-ensemble, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10.5 Tg) and 38.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (error-scaled, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11.4 Tg), both showing stronger reductions than the prior (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.0 Tg). Fossil fuel emissions (Fig. 4d) display temporal patterns distinct from the prior, with elevated early-period emissions, a decrease through the late 1990s, and renewed growth from 2000 onward. The DPT-ensemble (106.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.2 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.2 Tg) and error-scaled (110.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8.4 Tg CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.1 Tg) inversions both estimate lower growth in fossil fuel emissions than the prior (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44.0 Tg). Figure 4d also includes GAINS inventory estimates (green line) for comparison. The GAINS model estimates emissions bottom-up, i.e., quantifications of human activities contributing to emissions are multiplied by an emission factor representing the average emissions per unit of activity (Höglund-Isaksson et al., 2020). Waste emissions (Fig. 4e) increase steadily: 79.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.6 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (DPT-ensemble, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.5 Tg) and 77.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.3 Tg CH<sub>4</sub> (error-scaled, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.4 Tg), both lower than prior growth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.1 Tg). Atmospheric lifetime (Fig. 4f) exhibits minimal variation, with higher temporal variations at the hemispheric scale compared to the global scale.</p>
      <p id="d2e4146">Figure 5 summarises the revisions to emission growth (top panel) and lifetime (bottom panel) across all inversion scenarios relative to the prior. The single-isotope inversions (carbon-only and hydrogen-only) show moderate adjustments across most sectors. In contrast, the dual-isotope, DPT-ensemble, and error-scaled inversions – all of which assimilate both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> – consistently re-estimate wetland growth toward the SH (red shading indicates prior underestimation, with revisions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 Tg) while reducing NH fossil fuel growth (blue shading indicates prior overestimation, with revisions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26 Tg). Agricultural and waste revisions are more modest across all scenarios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Tg), while pyrogenic reductions are consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 Tg additional decline beyond prior). The lifetime heatmap (bottom panel) reveals hemispheric divergence: SH lifetime increases by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 years across all isotope-constrained inversions, while NH lifetime decreases by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 years depending on the scenario. Global mean lifetime remains nearly constant at 9.1 years, with deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> years or less.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4273">Top panel: Hemispheric and global revisions w.r.t the priors (Growth<sub>posterior</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Growth<sub>prior</sub>) of the growth in emissions by sector (wetlands, agriculture, waste, fossil, pyrogenic) in teragrams (Tg) per year. Growth is defined as the difference between the 1993–95 and 2021–23 averages. Bottom panel: hemispheric and global revisions for CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime (in years). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>(CH<sub>4</sub>)-only inversion (using mole fraction data without isotopic constraints) is shown in Sect. S12. This inversion produces unrealistic source partitioning because it lacks isotopic information to distinguish biogenic from thermogenic sources, confirming the necessity of isotopic constraints for robust source attribution.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8601/2026/acp-26-8601-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Temporal changes of thermogenic and pyrogenic emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e4349">Prior inventories suggest steady fossil-fuel growth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44.0 Tg between 1994 and 2022. However, isotope-constrained inversions reveal that most fossil fuel growth occurred between 2000 and 2012, with minimal additional increases thereafter. The carbon-only inversion estimates net thermogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pyrogenic growth at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.6 Tg, while hydrogen-only inversions yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.9 Tg, and the dual-isotope solution at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.1 Tg. Runs that include <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> (hydrogen-only, dual-isotope, DPT-ensemble) consistently yield smaller thermogenic and pyrogenic growth, with the DPT-ensemble producing only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.7 Tg of net thermogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> pyrogenic growth, compared to the prior estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>36.0 Tg (which includes the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.0 Tg pyrogenic reduction).</p>
      <p id="d2e4432">The inferred total isotopic enrichment associated with methane removal is substantially larger for deuterium (313 ‰) than for carbon (6.8 ‰). In the case of <sup>13</sup>C, the sink fractionation is much smaller than the differences of isotopic source signatures between the different source categories, which span 40 ‰, whereas the <sup>2</sup>H sink fractionation is twice as wide as the range between the average source signatures of different categories of about 150 ‰ (Table 1). Thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> provides strong sensitivity to oxidation kinetics. Among the source categories, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D is particularly sensitive to fossil CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, which are the only source with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>200 ‰. This sensitivity is particularly evident in the timing of the posterior emissions with and without <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-constrained inversions assign roughly 5–10 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> more fossil emissions to the early 1990s and about 5–8 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> less to the 2010s than the carbon-only inversion, i.e. a higher early baseline and reduced recent growth. We note that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-inclusive inversions require higher fossil emissions, particularly in the late 1980s–early 1990s, but this overlaps with the model spin-up period (pre-1994) and should therefore be treated cautiously. Still, the  consistent post-1994 behaviour across hydrogen-only, dual-isotope and DPT runs supports the robustness of the reduced fossil-growth result.</p>
      <p id="d2e4553">The downward revision of the fossil increase suggests an underestimation of fossil-fuel emissions in the used inventory in the 1990s and early 2000s, followed by a modest overestimation in the late 2010s (Fig. 4). Although fossil-fuel production continued to rise over this period (IEA, 2023), our posterior emissions stayed comparatively flat. This may result from several non-exclusive and overlapping factors – including declining emission intensity per unit production, the adoption of mitigation measures, changes in extraction and fuel-mix practices, or errors and biases in bottom-up reporting – rather than any single cause. This interpretation is supported by independent inventory estimates from the GAINS model, which also reports lower emission intensities in recent decades (Höglund-Isaksson et al., 2020) and by inversion studies that do not find large fossil-driven growth and in some cases point to increased biogenic contributions (Thompson et al., 2018; Schaefer et al., 2016). Taken together, these lines of evidence support our conclusion that the fossil-fuel growth is likely overestimated in the used bottom-up inventory.</p>
      <p id="d2e4556">Traditional inversion setups that fix thermogenic isotopic signatures may underestimate regional shifts toward lower-emission production systems, such as modern shale-gas operations in the USA between 2000 and 2012 (Uveges et al., 2025). The DPT framework explores fossil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ‰ of literature values (Table S3), encompassing both conventional gas and heavier shale gas signatures (Uveges et al., 2025; Riddell-Young et al., 2025). Even at the heavier end of this range, the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D constraint requires substantial biogenic increases to explain the post-2006 growth, because the isotopic separation between fossil and biogenic methane in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D space (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110–150 ‰) is large relative to the explored fossil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D range. It is also worth noting that if countries overreport fossil-fuel emissions in their national inventories, which serve as the foundation for bottom-up estimates, the resulting prior estimates will overestimate these emissions relative to atmospheric inversion results. Recent evaluation of China's carbon emissions, for example, found that coal-related CO<sub>2</sub> output was overestimated due to incorrect assumptions about fuel quality, leading to a downward correction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14% for 2013 emissions and a cumulative reduction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.6 Gt CO<sub>2</sub> over 2000–2013 (Liu et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2025). Similar reporting uncertainties may affect CH<sub>4</sub> inventories.</p>
      <p id="d2e4647">The decline in pyrogenic emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.0 Tg in priors) aligns well with satellite observations of shrinking burn areas and improved fire management (van der Werf et al., 2017), and inversions consistently confirm this downward trajectory. These results imply that fossil fuels have played a steady but secondary role in post-2006 CH<sub>4</sub> growth, while biomass burning has declined more consistently than bottom-up inventories suggested. The reduction in net thermogenic growth from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>36.0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.7 Tg may indicate that certain emission drivers are potentially more influential in recent atmospheric trends than previously thought.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Temporal changes of biogenic emissions</title>
      <p id="d2e4688">Bottom-up priors suggest that wetlands, agriculture, and waste collectively contributed approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>81.5 Tg to global biogenic CH<sub>4</sub> growth from 1994 to 2022. However, all five inversion setups revise this estimate downward to between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>68.6 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>73.7 Tg, with the DPT-ensemble yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>69.0 Tg (Table S4). All five are cost-minimised solutions to the same observational constraints under different prior assumptions, and all converge on a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15% reduction in biogenic growth compared to prior estimates, while still making it the primary driver of post-2006 CH<sub>4</sub> growth.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Wetlands</title>
      <p id="d2e4752">The inversion retains wetlands as a major source but substantially attributes that growth toward the SH, oversetting the NH contribution by two-thirds (Fig. 5). This hemispheric distribution coincides with more negative atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> values, characteristic of biogenic CH<sub>4</sub> (Michel et al., 2024). Field studies link this to ENSO variability, where La Niña events expand tropical inundation and boost CH<sub>4</sub> release (Qu et al., 2024; Lin et al., 2024), aligning with the isotopic and atmospheric evidence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Agriculture</title>
      <p id="d2e4818">Prior estimate attributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.3 Tg of CH<sub>4</sub> growth to agriculture globally, dominated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.7 Tg from the NH, while all five inversion setups revise this downward, particularly in the NH (Fig. 5). The DPT-ensemble inversion estimates global agricultural growth at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.0 Tg, with the NH contributing only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0 Tg and the SH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.9 Tg. Similarly, the error-scaled inversion yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.7 Tg globally, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.4 Tg from the NH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.3 Tg from the SH. The shift aligns with documented adoption of CH<sub>4</sub> mitigation practices in rice paddies and livestock systems, such as alternate wetting and drying (AWD) in rice fields and improved manure management (Shyamsundar et al., 2019; <uri>https://www.cimmyt.org/</uri>, last access: 4 January 2025). These findings suggest that while agriculture remains a significant source of CH<sub>4</sub>, its contribution to recent growth, especially in the NH, may be overstated in inventories. Also worth noting here is that the DPT optimised <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> source signature is increased by 1 ‰ relative to priors, suggesting a higher abundance of C<sub>4</sub> crops, but such interpretations are inconclusive, particularly because source signatures and atmospheric observations in SH are fewer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>4.2.3</label><title>Waste</title>
      <p id="d2e4946">Waste-related CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, originating from landfills, wastewater, and organic waste decomposition, occupy an intermediate isotopic space between biogenic and thermogenic sources. Prior inventories estimated global waste emissions growth at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29.1 Tg since 1994, concentrated in the NH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.7 Tg NH vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.4 Tg SH). All inversion setups revise this estimate slightly downward, particularly in the NH. The DPT-ensemble and dual-isotope inversions both estimate global waste growth at approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.5 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.4 Tg, respectively, with the error-scaled inversion yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.4 Tg. Across all scenarios, NH waste growth is consistently reduced to between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>15.5 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.8 Tg, which is well below the prior estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.7 Tg, while SH growth remains relatively stable at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6.7 to 6.9 Tg.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Revised methane lifetime</title>
      <p id="d2e5038">Across our inversion suite, the posterior global mean lifetime is 9.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years, i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 year relative to the fixed prior (9.0 years). Examining the trend over the analysis period, the inverted lifetime reveals a slight net shortening of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years. Hemispherically, the two-box posteriors consistently indicate an NH shortening of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years and an SH lengthening of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years.</p>
      <p id="d2e5098">We note that in an inversion system, such modest adjustments could reflect true changes in sink strength, but they may also compensate for source re-estimations. Therefore, we compare the results to independent evidence on OH changes: studies suggest that the overall OH loss rate is generally “well buffered”. The assigned uncertainty was approximately 10 %–15 % uncertainty during the 2000s (Saunois et al., 2020; Nisbet et al., 2019), which means that a 9 % increase in tropical OH (Anderson et al., 2021; Stavert et al., 2021; Stevenson et al., 2020) is near the detection limit of global-scale budget estimates, similar to our findings. If OH (and/or Cl) have indeed increased modestly, a small but real shortening of lifetime would be expected. Our inversion's global lifetime change (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> year) aligns well between these perspectives: large enough to reflect plausible sink variability, yet small enough to be consistent with a largely stable OH background.</p>
      <p id="d2e5111">The hemispheric divergence, with NH lifetime declining (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years) and SH lifetime increasing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years), qualitatively aligns with independent evidence of stronger oxidant increases in the NH (Anderson et al., 2021) and the southward re-estimation of wetland emissions. Starting from our two-box model structure, the SH box exhibits a baseline longer lifetime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 9.3 years vs. 9.0 years NH) even in the prior, reflecting fundamental differences in oxidant regimes between hemispheres. We acknowledge that 3-D models are better suited for spatial attribution; our two-box framework limits robust hemispheric conclusions. We therefore focus on the more reliable global estimate: a slight lifetime decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 years. While modest, this adjustment improves the match to observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> trends, particularly by preventing overcorrection of isotopic signals when rebalancing source contributions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Hemispheric Output and Error Scaling</title>
      <p id="d2e5201">The pronounced interannual variability in posterior wetland emissions reflects compensatory adjustments within an underdetermined inversion  rather than model instability. Wetlands carry the largest absolute prior uncertainty (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> at 30 %), so year-to-year adjustments needed to balance atmospheric growth and lifetime variability are most strongly expressed in this category. Agriculture and waste, occupying intermediate isotopic space, are similarly susceptible. For this reason, sectoral growth is assessed using 3-year endpoint averages (Table S4) and 5-year moving averages (Fig. 4), which are robust across all five inversion scenarios. Our sensitivity experiments reveal that varying prior emission uncertainties from 30 % amplifies interannual (year-to-year) variability in posterior emissions. When prior uncertainties tighten below 30 %, absolute uncertainties scale with source size (e.g., wetlands: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 Tg; pyrogenic: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 Tg). To balance isotopic ratios annually, the inversion preferentially adjusts the largest sources because the same fixed uncertainty allows much larger absolute variability, leading to compensatory oscillations in posterior emissions and lifetime that can degrade isotopic fits. Only a minor fraction of this variability, if any, may be caused by teleconnections such as ENSO as seen in pyrogenic and wetland posterior emissions corresponding to El Niño and La Niña years, respectively. Similarly, relative observational error weighting between the 3 tracers critically influences inversion behaviour. Optimal performance occurs when relative uncertainties match isotopologue abundance ratios (1 ppb CH<sub>4</sub>, 0.01 ppb <sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>, 0.001 ppb CH<sub>3</sub>D).</p>
      <p id="d2e5288">All inversions presented thus far have used fixed uncertainties across sources: 30 % for all emission categories and 10 % for the tropospheric lifetime. To test whether the results are sensitive to this choice, we implemented an error-scaled inversion that adjusts prior uncertainty weights based on the relative flux magnitude of each source. Specifically, larger sources are assigned proportionally smaller absolute uncertainties, while the tropospheric lifetime uncertainty is tightened from 10 % to 9 % based on a sensitivity analysis that shows this configuration optimally balances source and sink adjustments. This error-scaled configuration yields more moderate hemispheric re-estimation than the unweighted dual-isotope inversion while maintaining improved fits to isotopic observations. For example, SH wetland growth is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>19.1 Tg (DPT) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.1 Tg (error-scaled), while NH wetland growth is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.4 Tg (DPT) versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.5 Tg (error-scaled). This demonstrates that hemispheric attributions are sensitive to prior weighting, although the global totals remain robust (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>69.0 Tg vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>68.6 Tg biogenic growth).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>New inferences from incorporating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> into the two-box model</title>
      <p id="d2e5361">Runs that include <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> (hydrogen-only, dual-isotope,  DPT-ensemble) consistently yield smaller thermogenic and pyrogenic growth than the carbon-only inversion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7.9–9.1 Tg vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16.6 Tg). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> is particularly responsive to the enriched deuterium signature of fossil CH<sub>4</sub> (also pyrogenic), and how fast that CH<sub>4</sub> is oxidised by OH (Stell et al., 2021). The physical basis for this  distinction lies in the magnitude of KIEs and the ranges of source signatures. The tropospheric KIE for deuterium (1.313) corresponds to a fractionation of 313 ‰, compared to 6.8 ‰ for carbon (KIE 1.0068), meaning the deuterium KIE deviation is approximately 46 times larger. This amplification is further enhanced by the large separation between biogenic and thermogenic source signatures in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D space (Table 1): biogenic sources range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>299 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>339 ‰, while fossil fuels cluster near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>191 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>192 ‰, a separation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 110 ‰–150 ‰. For comparison, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C separation is only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 ‰ (biogenic: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>58 ‰ to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64 ‰; fossil: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44 ‰). This results in higher fossil emissions at the beginning of our analysis period, and thus a smaller growth over the following decades, compared to the prior emissions.</p>
      <p id="d2e5512">The emission trends derived from our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D–CH<sub>4</sub>–constrained inversions closely align with those of other recent isotope studies, which collectively suggest that the post-2006 CH<sub>4</sub> growth is primarily microbial in origin, rather than fossil. Riddell-Young et al. (2025) found that both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-based mass balances attribute over 70 Tg yr<sup>−1</sup> of the 2006–2023 CH<sub>4</sub> increase to microbial sources, with little to no fossil trends after 2013. Our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-inclusive inversions similarly produce only a very small net thermogenic and pyrogenic growth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8–10 Tg) and significantly larger biogenic growth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 70 Tg). In our 2-box modelling setup, this is associated with a redistribution of emissions toward SH wetlands, reinforcing the notion that microbial sources dominate recent CH<sub>4</sub> increases. Fujita et al. (2025) likewise obtained a near-flat fossil emission trajectory after the early 2000s, closely matching the magnitude and trend of our posterior fossil emissions (Fig. 4d). Moreover, their inferred increase in OH (Fig. 6g) is consistent with the slight CH<sub>4</sub> lifetime decrease NH in our inversions (Table S4), indicating that modest sink strengthening, rather than rising fossil emissions, helps reconcile the post-2006 CH<sub>4</sub> growth. Chandra et al. (2024) highlighted major inventory biases in GAINS and EDGAR fossil sectors; our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D inversions support this interpretation but indicate that correcting early-period fossil baselines, rather than invoking strong post-2000 growth, better reconciles observed isotope trends. Together, these comparisons confirm that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> constraints yield smaller trends in fossil contributions than earlier inventories or single-isotope studies, providing independent support for a microbial-dominated CH<sub>4</sub> rise and underscoring the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> for refining emission histories.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Limitations of the two-box approach</title>
      <p id="d2e5686">Our two-box framework offers a conceptual and computationally efficient method for combining CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D observations, with the option to perform DPT experiments using millions of individual inversion runs. On the other hand, the two-box model approach has obvious limitations that impact spatial attribution and limit the attribution of the inferred emission adjustments. This approach, by design, collapses latitudinal structure into two hemispheric reservoirs, which removes regional signals, does not resolve mid-latitude or tropical gradients, and importantly, does not include intrahemispheric transport. The conclusions drawn at the global scale, i.e., the dominance of biogenic growth and the reduced fossil-fuel trend, are consistent across all inversion scenarios and are insensitive to lifetime partitioning between hemispheres. Hemispheric-scale results, including the NH/SH wetland split and hemispheric lifetime trends, are more sensitive to model structure and should be interpreted with caution. One question is then how the  hemispheric averages are constructed. In our work, we used high-latitude station records because they provide reliable and consistent temporal trends, including robust inter-laboratory offset estimation (Dasgupta et al., 2025a). This requires corrections for the latitudinal gradient to infer hemispheric averages, an approach that carries error when gradients change over time. Alternatively, the inter-laboratory offsets could also be applied to lower-latitude time series, where direct inter-station comparisons are more problematic because of stronger regional influences from nearby sources. However, if regional variability is included anyway, using explicit 3D models that incorporate spatial variability and atmospheric transport is likely the more insightful approach. Spatially resolved inversions may then provide more detailed insight into the origin of the derived emission adjustments compared to the prior. Based on our results, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D, it can indeed provide additional constraints compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C alone. Thus, it is also important to expand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D observations, which are still limited compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e5763">This study demonstrates that incorporating both carbon (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>) and hydrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>) isotopes into a two-box inversion framework enhances our understanding of the strength and temporal evolution of global CH<sub>4</sub> sources and sinks. All five inversion setups estimate that after 2007, wetland emissions must increase to reconcile the trend in atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> isotopologues. Hemispheric CH<sub>4</sub> lifetimes diverge, while globally, a small decrease in lifetime is observed.</p>
      <p id="d2e5830">Our results confirm that biogenic CH<sub>4</sub> sources are the main driver of the post-2006 CH<sub>4</sub> growth, although their increase and sectoral re-estimation have been revised from prior inventories. Second, thermogenic and pyrogenic growth are far smaller than previously thought, due to lower fossil fuel growth and stronger declines in pyrogenic emissions. Third, wetland emissions have shifted southward, with the SH now contributing nearly as much, or more, to global wetland growth as the NH, reflecting stronger tropical wetland responses to climate change. Fourth, agricultural emissions are revised downward, especially in the NH, where growth drops from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>14.7 to just <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.0–5.4 Tg, while SH contributions remain stable. Fifth, the dual-isotope inverted lifetime of CH<sub>4</sub> shortens between 1994 and 2022 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.1 years), with hemispheric adjustments diverging (NH: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.2 years; SH: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.3 years).</p>
      <p id="d2e5896">While the two-box model provides robust global insights, it lacks spatial resolution. Error-scaled inversions confirm that hemispheric re-estimations are affected by prior uncertainty, but regional source–sink interplay remains unresolved. Future work should expand <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> observations, especially in tropical and mid-latitude regions, and adopt 3-D or 4-D inversion frameworks to improve spatial attribution and reduce residual uncertainties.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5919">The harmonised dataset used in the inversion model is available on the ICOS data portal at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18160/V1Y4-NTK0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18160/V1Y4-NTK0</ext-link> (Dasgupta et al., 2025b). The relevant Python scripts for the inversion model are available from the author upon request. Additional descriptions, sensitivity tests, the governing continuity equations of the 2-box model, and its numerical implementation are available in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5925">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8601-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8601-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5934">BD and TR conceptualised the manuscript. BD carried out the analysis, investigation, methodology and visualisation. SP, MM, and SH contributed to inversion modelling, analysis, and visualisation. MM, BRY, RF, SEM and PS helped with analysis and investigation. All authors contributed to the review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5940">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5946">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5952">The project (24GRD03 – MetHIR) has received funding from the European Partnership on Metrology, co-financed from the European Union's Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme and by the Participating States. Part of this work was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (80NM0018D0004). This study was supported in part by NOAA cooperative agreement NA22OAR4320151 and was also partially supported by NOAA Climate Program Office AC4 program award NA23OAR4310283.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5957">This research has been supported by the European Partnership on Metrology (grant no. 24GRD03 – MetHIR)</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5963">This paper was edited by Tanja Schuck and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Fiore, A. M., Baublitz, C. B., Follette-Cook, M. B., Nicely, J. M., and Wolfe, G. M.: Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6481–6508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Basu, S., Lan, X., Dlugokencky, E., Michel, S., Schwietzke, S., Miller, J. B., Bruhwiler, L., Oh, Y., Tans, P. P., Apadula, F., Gatti, L. V., Jordan, A., Necki, J., Sasakawa, M., Morimoto, S., Di Iorio, T., Lee, H., Arduini, J., and Manca, G.: Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C of methane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15351–15377, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15351-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-15351-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bellisario, L. M., Bubier, J. L., Moore, T. R., and Chanton, J. P.: Controls on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from a northern peatland, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13, 81–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GB900021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998GB900021</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Miller, J. B., Dlugokencky, E. J., Hauglustaine, D. A., Prigent, C., Van der Werf, G. R., Peylin, P., Brunke, E. G., Carouge, C., and Langenfelds, R. L.: Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature, 443, 439–443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature05132</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bousquet, P., Ringeval, B., Pison, I., Dlugokencky, E. J., Brunke, E.-G., Carouge, C., Chevallier, F., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Frankenberg, C., Hauglustaine, D. A., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Ramonet, M., Schmidt, M., Steele, L. P., Szopa, S., Yver, C., Viovy, N., and Ciais, P.: Source attribution of the changes in atmospheric methane for 2006–2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3689–3700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3689-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-3689-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cantrell, C. A., Shetter, R. E., McDaniel, A. H., Calvert, J. G., Davidson, J. A., Lowe, D. C., Tyler, S. C., Cicerone, R. J., and Greenberg, J. P.: Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the oxidation of methane by the hydroxyl radical, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 22455–22462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD13p22455" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD095iD13p22455</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chandra, N., Patra, P. K., Fujita, R., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Umezawa, T., Goto, D., Morimoto, S., Vaughn, B. H., and Röckmann, T.: Methane emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 147, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01286-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-024-01286-x</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Dasgupta, B., Menoud, M., van der Veen, C., Levin, I., Veidt, C., Moossen, H., Englund Michel, S., Sperlich, P., Morimoto, S., Fujita, R., Umezawa, T., Platt, S., Zwaaftink, C. G., Myhre, C. L., Fisher, R., Lowry, D., Nisbet, E. G., France, J., Woolley Maisch, C., Brailsford, G., Moss, R., Goto, D., Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Warwick, N., and Röckmann, T.: Harmonisation of methane isotope ratio measurements from different laboratories using atmospheric samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6591–6607, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6591-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-6591-2025</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Dasgupta, B., Menoud, M., van der Veen, C., Levin, I., Moossen, H., Englund Michel, S., Sperlich, P., Morimoto, S., Fujita, R., Umezawa, T., Platt, S. M., Groot Zwaaftink, C., Lund Myhre, C., Fisher, R., Lowry, D., Nisbet, E., France, J., Woolley Maisch, C., Brailsford, G., Moss, R., Goto, D., Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Warwick, N., and Röckmann, T.: Harmonised and offset corrected methane isotopic composition (ch4, 13ch4, d2h_ch4) from high northern and southern latitudes, ICOS Data Portal [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18160/V1Y4-NTK0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18160/V1Y4-NTK0</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Douglas, P. M. J., Stratigopoulos, E., Park, S., and Phan, D.: Geographic variability in freshwater methane hydrogen isotope ratios and its implications for global isotopic source signatures, Biogeosciences, 18, 3505–3527, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3505-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-18-3505-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Fujita, R., Graven, H., Zazzeri, G., Hmiel, B., Petrenko, V. V., Smith, A. M., Michel, S. E., and Morimoto, S.: Global fossil methane emissions constrained by multi-isotopic atmospheric methane histories, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD041266, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD041266</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Fujita, R., Morimoto, S., Maksyutov, S., Kim, H.-S., Arshinov, M., Brailsford, G., Aoki, S., and Nakazawa, T.: Global and Regional CH<sub>4</sub> Emissions for 1995–2013 Derived From Atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> Observations and a Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032903, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD032903</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Höglund-Isaksson, L., Gómez-Sanabria, A., Klimont, Z., Rafaj, P., and Schöpp, W.: Technical potentials and costs for reducing global anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe–results from the GAINS model, Environ. Res. Commun., 2, 025004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab7457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/2515-7620/ab7457</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Hornibrook, E. R. and Bowes, H. L.: Trophic status impacts both the magnitude and stable carbon isotope composition of methane flux from peatlands, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L21401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL031231</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Hornibrook, E. R.: The stable carbon isotope composition of methane produced and emitted from northern peatlands, in: Carbon cycling in northern peatlands, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 184, 187–203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GM000828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GM000828</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Houweling, S., Bergamaschi, P., Chevallier, F., Heimann, M., Kaminski, T., Krol, M., Michalak, A. M., and Patra, P.: Global inverse modeling of CH<sub>4</sub> sources and sinks: an overview of methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 235–256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-235-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-235-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hu, H., Geng, G., Xu, R., Liu, Y., Shi, Q., Xiao, Q., Liu, X., Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Notable uncertainties in near real-time CO<sub>2</sub> emission estimates in China, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00991-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-025-00991-4</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>IEA: Fossil fuel supply, IEA, Paris, <uri>https://www.iea.org/reports/fossil-fuel-supply</uri> (last access: 4 January 2025), 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Kirschke, S., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Bergamaschi, P., Bergmann, D., Blake, D. R., Bruhwiler, L., Cameron-Smith, P., Castaldi, S., Chevallier, F., Feng, L., Fraser, A., Heimann, M., Hodson, E. L., Houweling, S., Josse, B., Fraser, P. J., Krummel, P. B., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R. L., Le Quéré, C., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Palmer, P. I., Pison, I., Plummer, D., Poulter, B., Prinn, R. G., Rigby, M., Ringeval, B., Santini, M., Schmidt, M., Shindell, D. T., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, L. P., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K., Szopa, S., van der Werf, G. R., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., Weiss, R. F., Williams, J. E., and Zeng, G.: Three decades of global methane sources and sinks, Nat. Geosci., 6, 813–823, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo1955</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Lan, X., Basu, S., Schwietzke, S., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Sherwood, O. A., Tans, P. P., Thoning, K., Etiope, G., Zhuang, Q., Liu, L., Oh, Y., Miller, J. B., Pétron, G., Vaughn, B. H., and Crippa, M.: Improved Constraints on Global Methane Emissions and Sinks Using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 35, e2021GB007000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GB007000</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Lin, X., Peng, S., Ciais, P., Hauglustaine, D., Lan, X., Liu, G., Ramonet, M., Xi, Y., Yin, Y., Zhang, Z., Bösch, H., Bousquet, P., Saunois, M., and Li, Z.: Recent methane surges reveal heightened emissions from tropical inundated areas, Nat. Commun., 15, 10894, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55266-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-55266-y</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Z., Guan, D., Wei, W., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., Bai, J., Peng, S., Zhang, Q., Hubacek, K., Marland, G., Andres, R. J., Crawford-Brown, D., Lin, J., Zhao, H., Hong, C., Boden, T. A., Feng, K., Peters, G. P., Xi, F., Liu, J., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Zeng, N., and He, K.: Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China, Nature, 524, 335–338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14677" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature14677</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Menoud, M., van der Veen, C., Lowry, D., Fernandez, J. M., Bakkaloglu, S., France, J. L., Fisher, R. E., Maazallahi, H., Stanisavljević, M., Nęcki, J., Vinkovic, K., Łakomiec, P., Rinne, J., Korbeń, P., Schmidt, M., Defratyka, S., Yver-Kwok, C., Andersen, T., Chen, H., and Röckmann, T.: New contributions of measurements in Europe to the global inventory of the stable isotopic composition of methane, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4365–4386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4365-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-4365-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Michel, S. E., Lan, X., Miller, J., Tans, P., Clark, J. R., Schaefer, H., Sperlich, P., Brailsford, G., Morimoto, S., Moossen, H., Li, J., Englund Michel, S., Umezawa, T., and Röckmann, T.: Rapid shift in methane carbon isotopes suggests microbial emissions drove record high atmospheric methane growth in 2020–2022, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 121, e2411212121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2411212121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2411212121</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Tans, P. P., Bruhwiler, L. M., Miller, J. B., and Heimann, M.: CH<sub>4</sub> sources estimated from atmospheric observations of CH<sub>4</sub> and its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> isotopic ratios: 1. Inverse modeling of source processes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002223" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GB002223</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Monteil, G., Houweling, S., Dlugockenky, E. J., Maenhout, G., Vaughn, B. H., White, J. W. C., and Rockmann, T.: Interpreting methane variations in the past two decades using measurements of CH<sub>4</sub> mixing ratio and isotopic composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9141–9153, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9141-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-9141-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F. M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J. F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 659–740, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Nisbet, E. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Manning, M. R., Lowry, D., Fisher, R. E., France, J. L., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., White, J. W. C., Vaughn, B., Bousquet, P., Pyle, J. A., Warwick, N. J., Cain, M., Brownlow, R., Zazzeri, G., Lanoisellé, M., Manning, A. C., Gloor, E., Worthy, D. E. J., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Wolff, E. W., and Ganesan, A. L.: Rising atmospheric methane: 2007–2014 growth and isotopic shift, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1356–1370, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005406" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GB005406</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Nisbet, E. G., Manning, M. R., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Lund Myhre, C., Platt, S. M., Allen, G., Bousquet, P., Brownlow, R., Cain, M., France, J. L., Hermansen, O., Hossaini, R., Jones, A. E., Levin, I., Manning, A. C., Myhre, G., Pyle, J. A., Vaughn, B. H., Warwick, N. J., and White, J. W. C.: Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 318–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GB006009</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D., and Hsu, J.: Reactive greenhouse gas scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012GL051440</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Qu, Z., Jacob, D. J., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J. R., Parker, R. J., and Boesch, H.: Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 121, e2402730121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402730121" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2402730121</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Reeburgh, W. S., Hirsch, A. I., Sansone, F. J., Popp, B. N., and Rust, T. M.: Carbon kinetic isotope effect accompanying microbial oxidation of methane in boreal forest soils, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 61, 4761–4767, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00277-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00277-9</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Riddell-Young, B., Michel, S.E., Lan, X., Tans, P., Röckmann, T., Dasgupta, B., Oh, Y., Bruhwiler, L.M., Fujita, R., Umezawa, T., and Morimoto, S.: Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH<sub>4</sub> growth indicated by trends in atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D–CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C–CH<sub>4</sub>. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 122, e2516543122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2516543122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2516543122</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Rigby, M., Manning, A. J., and Prinn, R. G.: The value of high-frequency high-precision methane isotopologue measurements for source and sink estimation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D12312, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD017384</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Röckmann, T., Brass, M., Borchers, R., and Engel, A.: The isotopic composition of methane in the stratosphere: high-altitude balloon sample measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13287–13304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13287-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-13287-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Sapart, C. J., Martinerie, P., Witrant, E., Chappellaz, J., van de Wal, R. S. W., Sperlich, P., van der Veen, C., Bernard, S., Sturges, W. T., Blunier, T., Schwander, J., Etheridge, D., and Röckmann, T.: Can the carbon isotopic composition of methane be reconstructed from multi-site firn air measurements?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6993–7005, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6993-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-6993-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Saueressig, G., Bergamaschi, P., Crowley, J. N., Fischer, H., and Harris, G. W.: Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the reaction of CH<sub>4</sub> with Cl atoms, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1225–1228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95GL00881</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Saueressig, G., Bergamaschi, P., Crowley, J. N., Fischer, H., and Harris, G. W.: D<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>H kinetic isotope effect in the reaction CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Cl, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 3619–3622, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL03292" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96GL03292</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Saueressig, G., Crowley, J. N., Bergamaschi, P., Brühl, C., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., and Fischer, H.: Carbon 13 and D kinetic isotope effects in the reactions of CH<sub>4</sub> with O(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and OH: New laboratory measurements and their implications for the isotopic composition of stratospheric methane, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23127–23138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000120" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000120</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget 2000–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Saunois, M., Martinez, A., Poulter, B., Zhang, Z., Raymond, P. A., Regnier, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Patra, P. K., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lan, X., Allen, G. H., Bastviken, D., Beerling, D. J., Belikov, D. A., Blake, D. R., Castaldi, S., Crippa, M., Deemer, B. R., Dennison, F., Etiope, G., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Holgerson, M. A., Hopcroft, P. O., Hugelius, G., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Janardanan, R., Johnson, M. S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Lauerwald, R., Li, T., Liu, X., McDonald, K. C., Melton, J. R., Mühle, J., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., Pan, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Rocher-Ros, G., Rosentreter, J. A., Sasakawa, M., Segers, A., Smith, S. J., Stanley, E. H., Thanwerdas, J., Tian, H., Tsuruta, A., Tubiello, F. N., Weber, T. S., van der Werf, G. R., Worthy, D. E. J., Xi, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: Global Methane Budget 2000–2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1873–1958, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Schaefer, H., Fletcher, S. E. M., Veidt, C., Lassey, K. R., Brailsford, G. W., Bromley, T. M., Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., Levin, I., Lowe, D. C., Martin, R. J., Vaughn, B. H., and White, J. W. C.: A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by <sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>, Science, 352, 80–84, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2705" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aad2705</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Schwietzke, S., Sherwood, O. A., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Miller, J. B., Etiope, G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Arling, V. A., Vaughn, B. H., White, J. W. C., and Tans, P. P.: Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database, Nature, 538, 88–91, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature19797</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Sherwood, O. A., Schwietzke, S., Arling, V. A., and Etiope, G.: Global Inventory of Gas Geochemistry Data from Fossil Fuel, Microbial and Burning Sources, version 2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 639–656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-639-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-639-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Shyamsundar, P., Springer, N. P., Tallis, H., Polasky, S., Jat, M. L., Sidhu, H. S., Krishnapriya, P. P., Skiba, N., Ginn, W., Ahuja, V., Cummins, J., Datta, I., Dholakia, H. H., Dixon, J., Farrell, P., Gonzalez-Abraham, C., Tittonell, P., Leisher, C., Mandle, L., Mulligan, M., Naeem, S., Ricketts, T. H., Wunder, S., and Zhang, W.: Fields on fire: Alternatives to crop residue burning in India, Science, 365, 536–538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw4085" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.aaw4085</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Snover, A. K. and Quay, P. D.: Hydrogen and carbon kinetic isotope effects during soil uptake of atmospheric methane, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 25–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GB900089</ext-link>, 2000. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Stavert, A. R., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G., Poulter, B., Jackson, R. B., Regnier, P., Lauerwald, R., Raymond, P. A., Allen, G. H., Patra, P. K., Bergamaschi, P., Bousquet, P., Chandra, N., Ciais, P., Gustafson, A., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Kleinen, T., Maksyutov, S., Joe McNorton, J. R., Melton, Müller, J., Niwa, Y., Peng, S., Riley, W. J., Segers, A., Tian, H., Tsuruta, A., Yin, Y., Zhang, Z., Zheng, B., and Zhuang, Q.: Regional trends and drivers of the global methane budget, Glob. Change Biol., 28, 182–200, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15901" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/gcb.15901</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Stell, A. C., Douglas, P. M. J., Rigby, M., and Ganesan, A. L.: The impact of spatially varying wetland source signatures on the atmospheric variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub>, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 379, 20200442, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2020.0442</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P. T., Shim, S., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L. T., and Emmons, L.: Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12905–12920, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, R. L., Nisbet, E. G., Pisso, I., Stohl, A., Blake, D., Dlugokencky, E. J., Helmig, D., and White, J. W. C.: Variability in Atmospheric Methane From Fossil Fuel and Microbial Sources Over the Last Three Decades, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11499–11508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL078127</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O., and Jacob, D. J.: Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5367–5372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616020114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Tyler, S. C., Brailsford, G. W., Yagi, K., Minami, K., and Cicerone, R. J.: Seasonal variations in methane flux and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CH<sub>4</sub> values for rice paddies in Japan and their implications, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93GB03123</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Tyler, S. C., Rice, A. L., and Ajie, H. O.: Stable isotope ratios in atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub>: Implications for seasonal sources and sinks, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D03303, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007231" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007231</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Uveges, B. T., Howarth, R. W., and Sparks, J. P.: Fossil fuel methane emissions likely underestimated in a model based on atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C trends, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 122, e2507837122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2507837122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2507837122</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Warwick, N. J., Cain, M. L., Fisher, R., France, J. L., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Nisbet, E. G., Vaughn, B. H., White, J. W. C., and Pyle, J. A.: Using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>D-CH<sub>4</sub> to constrain Arctic methane emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14891–14908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14891-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14891-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Worden, J. R., Bloom, A. A., Pandey, S., Jiang, Z., Worden, H. M., Walker, T. W., Houweling, S., and Röckmann, T.: Reduced biomass burning emissions reconcile conflicting estimates of the post-2006 atmospheric methane budget, Nat. Commun., 8, 2227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Global methane emission estimates from a dual-isotope inversion: new constraints from <i>δ</i>D-CH<sub>4</sub></article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Fiore, A. M., Baublitz, C. B., Follette-Cook, M. B., Nicely, J. M., and Wolfe, G. M.: Spatial and temporal variability in the hydroxyl (OH) radical: understanding the role of large-scale climate features and their influence on OH through its dynamical and photochemical drivers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6481–6508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6481-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Basu, S., Lan, X., Dlugokencky, E., Michel, S., Schwietzke, S., Miller, J. B., Bruhwiler, L., Oh, Y., Tans, P. P., Apadula, F., Gatti, L. V., Jordan, A., Necki, J., Sasakawa, M., Morimoto, S., Di Iorio, T., Lee, H., Arduini, J., and Manca, G.: Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C of methane, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15351–15377, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15351-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15351-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bellisario, L. M., Bubier, J. L., Moore, T. R., and Chanton, J. P.: Controls
on CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from a northern peatland, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 13,
81–91, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GB900021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998GB900021</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Miller, J. B., Dlugokencky, E. J., Hauglustaine, D.
A., Prigent, C., Van der Werf, G. R., Peylin, P., Brunke, E. G., Carouge,
C., and Langenfelds, R. L.: Contribution of anthropogenic and natural
sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature, 443, 439–443,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05132</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bousquet, P., Ringeval, B., Pison, I., Dlugokencky, E. J., Brunke, E.-G., Carouge, C., Chevallier, F., Fortems-Cheiney, A., Frankenberg, C., Hauglustaine, D. A., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Ramonet, M., Schmidt, M., Steele, L. P., Szopa, S., Yver, C., Viovy, N., and Ciais, P.: Source attribution of the changes in atmospheric methane for 2006–2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3689–3700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3689-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3689-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cantrell, C. A., Shetter, R. E., McDaniel, A. H., Calvert, J. G., Davidson,
J. A., Lowe, D. C., Tyler, S. C., Cicerone, R. J., and Greenberg, J. P.:
Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the oxidation of methane by the hydroxyl
radical, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 22455–22462,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD13p22455" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD095iD13p22455</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chandra, N., Patra, P. K., Fujita, R., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Umezawa,
T., Goto, D., Morimoto, S., Vaughn, B. H., and Röckmann, T.: Methane
emissions decreased in fossil fuel exploitation and sustainably increased in microbial source sectors during 1990–2020, Commun. Earth Environ., 5, 147, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01286-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01286-x</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dasgupta, B., Menoud, M., van der Veen, C., Levin, I., Veidt, C., Moossen, H., Englund Michel, S., Sperlich, P., Morimoto, S., Fujita, R., Umezawa, T., Platt, S., Zwaaftink, C. G., Myhre, C. L., Fisher, R., Lowry, D., Nisbet, E. G., France, J., Woolley Maisch, C., Brailsford, G., Moss, R., Goto, D., Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Warwick, N., and Röckmann, T.: Harmonisation of methane isotope ratio measurements from different laboratories using atmospheric samples, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6591–6607, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6591-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6591-2025</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dasgupta, B., Menoud, M., van der Veen, C., Levin, I., Moossen, H.,
Englund Michel, S., Sperlich, P., Morimoto, S., Fujita, R., Umezawa, T.,
Platt, S. M., Groot Zwaaftink, C., Lund Myhre, C., Fisher, R., Lowry, D.,
Nisbet, E., France, J., Woolley Maisch, C., Brailsford, G., Moss, R., Goto,
D., Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Warwick, N., and Röckmann, T.: Harmonised
and offset corrected methane isotopic composition (ch4, 13ch4,
d2h_ch4) from high northern and southern latitudes, ICOS Data
Portal [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.18160/V1Y4-NTK0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18160/V1Y4-NTK0</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Douglas, P. M. J., Stratigopoulos, E., Park, S., and Phan, D.: Geographic variability in freshwater methane hydrogen isotope ratios and its implications for global isotopic source signatures, Biogeosciences, 18, 3505–3527, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3505-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-3505-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fujita, R., Graven, H., Zazzeri, G., Hmiel, B., Petrenko, V. V., Smith, A.
M., Michel, S. E., and Morimoto, S.: Global fossil methane emissions
constrained by multi-isotopic atmospheric methane histories, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD041266, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041266</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fujita, R., Morimoto, S., Maksyutov, S., Kim, H.-S., Arshinov, M.,
Brailsford, G., Aoki, S., and Nakazawa, T.: Global and Regional CH<sub>4</sub>
Emissions for 1995–2013 Derived From Atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub>, <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, and <i>δ</i>D-CH<sub>4</sub> Observations and a Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2020JD032903, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032903" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032903</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Höglund-Isaksson, L., Gómez-Sanabria, A., Klimont, Z., Rafaj, P.,
and Schöpp, W.: Technical potentials and costs for reducing global
anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe–results from the
GAINS model, Environ. Res. Commun., 2, 025004,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab7457" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab7457</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hornibrook, E. R. and Bowes, H. L.: Trophic status impacts both the
magnitude and stable carbon isotope composition of methane flux from
peatlands, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L21401,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL031231</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hornibrook, E. R.: The stable carbon isotope composition of methane produced and emitted from northern peatlands, in: Carbon cycling in northern peatlands, Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 184, 187–203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GM000828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GM000828</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Houweling, S., Bergamaschi, P., Chevallier, F., Heimann, M., Kaminski, T., Krol, M., Michalak, A. M., and Patra, P.: Global inverse modeling of CH<sub>4</sub> sources and sinks: an overview of methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 235–256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-235-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-235-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hu, H., Geng, G., Xu, R., Liu, Y., Shi, Q., Xiao, Q., Liu, X., Zheng, B.,
Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Notable uncertainties in near real-time CO<sub>2</sub> emission estimates in China, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 108,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00991-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00991-4</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
IEA: Fossil fuel supply, IEA, Paris,
<a href="https://www.iea.org/reports/fossil-fuel-supply" target="_blank"/> (last access: 4 January 2025), 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kirschke, S., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G.,
Dlugokencky, E. J., Bergamaschi, P., Bergmann, D., Blake, D. R., Bruhwiler,
L., Cameron-Smith, P., Castaldi, S., Chevallier, F., Feng, L., Fraser, A.,
Heimann, M., Hodson, E. L., Houweling, S., Josse, B., Fraser, P. J.,
Krummel, P. B., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R. L., Le Quéré, C.,
Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Palmer, P. I., Pison, I., Plummer, D., Poulter, B.,
Prinn, R. G., Rigby, M., Ringeval, B., Santini, M., Schmidt, M., Shindell,
D. T., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, L. P., Strode, S. A., Sudo, K.,
Szopa, S., van der Werf, G. R., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., Weiss, R.
F., Williams, J. E., and Zeng, G.: Three decades of global methane sources
and sinks, Nat. Geosci., 6, 813–823, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1955</a>,
2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lan, X., Basu, S., Schwietzke, S., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Dlugokencky, E. J.,
Michel, S. E., Sherwood, O. A., Tans, P. P., Thoning, K., Etiope, G.,
Zhuang, Q., Liu, L., Oh, Y., Miller, J. B., Pétron, G., Vaughn, B. H.,
and Crippa, M.: Improved Constraints on Global Methane Emissions and Sinks
Using <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub>, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 35, e2021GB007000,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GB007000</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lin, X., Peng, S., Ciais, P., Hauglustaine, D., Lan, X., Liu, G., Ramonet,
M., Xi, Y., Yin, Y., Zhang, Z., Bösch, H., Bousquet, P., Saunois, M.,
and Li, Z.: Recent methane surges reveal heightened emissions from tropical
inundated areas, Nat. Commun., 15, 10894, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55266-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-55266-y</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Z., Guan, D., Wei, W., Davis, S. J., Ciais, P., Bai, J., Peng, S.,
Zhang, Q., Hubacek, K., Marland, G., Andres, R. J., Crawford-Brown, D., Lin, J., Zhao, H., Hong, C., Boden, T. A., Feng, K., Peters, G. P., Xi, F., Liu,
J., Li, Y., Zhao, Y., Zeng, N., and He, K.: Reduced carbon emission
estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China,
Nature, 524, 335–338, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14677" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14677</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Menoud, M., van der Veen, C., Lowry, D., Fernandez, J. M., Bakkaloglu, S., France, J. L., Fisher, R. E., Maazallahi, H., Stanisavljević, M., Nęcki, J., Vinkovic, K., Łakomiec, P., Rinne, J., Korbeń, P., Schmidt, M., Defratyka, S., Yver-Kwok, C., Andersen, T., Chen, H., and Röckmann, T.: New contributions of measurements in Europe to the global inventory of the stable isotopic composition of methane, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 4365–4386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4365-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4365-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Michel, S. E., Lan, X., Miller, J., Tans, P., Clark, J. R., Schaefer, H.,
Sperlich, P., Brailsford, G., Morimoto, S., Moossen, H., Li, J., Englund
Michel, S., Umezawa, T., and Röckmann, T.: Rapid shift in methane carbon
isotopes suggests microbial emissions drove record high atmospheric methane
growth in 2020–2022, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 121, e2411212121,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2411212121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2411212121</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mikaloff Fletcher, S. E., Tans, P. P., Bruhwiler, L. M., Miller, J. B., and
Heimann, M.: CH<sub>4</sub> sources estimated from atmospheric observations of CH<sub>4</sub> and its <sup>13</sup>C∕<sup>12</sup>C isotopic ratios: 1. Inverse modeling of source processes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18, GB4004, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002223" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002223</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Monteil, G., Houweling, S., Dlugockenky, E. J., Maenhout, G., Vaughn, B. H., White, J. W. C., and Rockmann, T.: Interpreting methane variations in the past two decades using measurements of CH<sub>4</sub> mixing ratio and isotopic composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9141–9153, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9141-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9141-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F. M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J.,
Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J. F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T.,
Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and
natural radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science
Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 659–740, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nisbet, E. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Manning, M. R., Lowry, D., Fisher, R. E.,
France, J. L., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., White, J. W. C., Vaughn, B.,
Bousquet, P., Pyle, J. A., Warwick, N. J., Cain, M., Brownlow, R., Zazzeri,
G., Lanoisellé, M., Manning, A. C., Gloor, E., Worthy, D. E. J., Brunke, E.-G., Labuschagne, C., Wolff, E. W., and Ganesan, A. L.: Rising atmospheric methane: 2007–2014 growth and isotopic shift, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 30, 1356–1370, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005406" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GB005406</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nisbet, E. G., Manning, M. R., Dlugokencky, E. J., Fisher, R. E., Lowry, D.,
Michel, S. E., Lund Myhre, C., Platt, S. M., Allen, G., Bousquet, P.,
Brownlow, R., Cain, M., France, J. L., Hermansen, O., Hossaini, R., Jones,
A. E., Levin, I., Manning, A. C., Myhre, G., Pyle, J. A., Vaughn, B. H.,
Warwick, N. J., and White, J. W. C.: Very Strong Atmospheric Methane Growth
in the 4 Years 2014–2017: Implications for the Paris Agreement, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 33, 318–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GB006009</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prather, M. J., Holmes, C. D., and Hsu, J.: Reactive greenhouse gas
scenarios: Systematic exploration of uncertainties and the role of
atmospheric chemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L09803,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051440</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Qu, Z., Jacob, D. J., Bloom, A. A., Worden, J. R., Parker, R. J., and
Boesch, H.: Inverse modeling of 2010–2022 satellite observations shows that inundation of the wet tropics drove the 2020–2022 methane surge, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 121, e2402730121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402730121" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2402730121</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Reeburgh, W. S., Hirsch, A. I., Sansone, F. J., Popp, B. N., and Rust, T.
M.: Carbon kinetic isotope effect accompanying microbial oxidation of
methane in boreal forest soils, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 61, 4761–4767,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00277-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00277-9</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riddell-Young, B., Michel, S.E., Lan, X., Tans, P., Röckmann, T.,
Dasgupta, B., Oh, Y., Bruhwiler, L.M., Fujita, R., Umezawa, T., and Morimoto,
S.: Microbial driver of 2006–2023 CH<sub>4</sub> growth indicated by trends in
atmospheric <i>δ</i>D–CH<sub>4</sub> and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C–CH<sub>4</sub>. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 122, e2516543122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2516543122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2516543122</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rigby, M., Manning, A. J., and Prinn, R. G.: The value of high-frequency
high-precision methane isotopologue measurements for source and sink
estimation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D12312,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017384</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Röckmann, T., Brass, M., Borchers, R., and Engel, A.: The isotopic composition of methane in the stratosphere: high-altitude balloon sample measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 13287–13304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13287-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-13287-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sapart, C. J., Martinerie, P., Witrant, E., Chappellaz, J., van de Wal, R. S. W., Sperlich, P., van der Veen, C., Bernard, S., Sturges, W. T., Blunier, T., Schwander, J., Etheridge, D., and Röckmann, T.: Can the carbon isotopic composition of methane be reconstructed from multi-site firn air measurements?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 6993–7005, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6993-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-6993-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saueressig, G., Bergamaschi, P., Crowley, J. N., Fischer, H., and Harris, G.
W.: Carbon kinetic isotope effect in the reaction of CH<sub>4</sub> with Cl atoms,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1225–1228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95GL00881</a>,
1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saueressig, G., Bergamaschi, P., Crowley, J. N., Fischer, H., and Harris, G. W.: D∕H kinetic isotope effect in the reaction CH<sub>4</sub>+&thinsp;Cl, Geophys. Res. Lett., 23, 3619–3622, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL03292" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL03292</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saueressig, G., Crowley, J. N., Bergamaschi, P., Brühl, C.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., and Fischer, H.: Carbon 13 and D kinetic isotope
effects in the reactions of CH<sub>4</sub> with O(<sup>1</sup><i>D</i>) and OH: New laboratory
measurements and their implications for the isotopic composition of
stratospheric methane, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 23127–23138,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000120" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000120</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saunois, M., Bousquet, P., Poulter, B., Peregon, A., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Etiope, G., Bastviken, D., Houweling, S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Tubiello, F. N., Castaldi, S., Jackson, R. B., Alexe, M., Arora, V. K., Beerling, D. J., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Brovkin, V., Bruhwiler, L., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P., Covey, K., Curry, C., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Joos, F., Kim, H.-S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P., Lamarque, J.-F., Langenfelds, R., Locatelli, R., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., Marshall, J., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Naik, V., O'Doherty, S., Parmentier, F.-J. W., Patra, P. K., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Pison, I., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Saito, M., Santini, M., Schroeder, R., Simpson, I. J., Spahni, R., Steele, P., Takizawa, A., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R., Wiedinmyer, C., Wilton, D. J., Wiltshire, A., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Xu, X., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, Q.: The global methane budget 2000–2012, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8, 697–751, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-8-697-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saunois, M., Stavert, A. R., Poulter, B., Bousquet, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Raymond, P. A., Dlugokencky, E. J., Houweling, S., Patra, P. K., Ciais, P., Arora, V. K., Bastviken, D., Bergamaschi, P., Blake, D. R., Brailsford, G., Bruhwiler, L., Carlson, K. M., Carrol, M., Castaldi, S., Chandra, N., Crevoisier, C., Crill, P. M., Covey, K., Curry, C. L., Etiope, G., Frankenberg, C., Gedney, N., Hegglin, M. I., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Hugelius, G., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Jensen, K. M., Joos, F., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Langenfelds, R. L., Laruelle, G. G., Liu, L., Machida, T., Maksyutov, S., McDonald, K. C., McNorton, J., Miller, P. A., Melton, J. R., Morino, I., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Naik, V., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., O'Doherty, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Peng, S., Peters, G. P., Prigent, C., Prinn, R., Ramonet, M., Regnier, P., Riley, W. J., Rosentreter, J. A., Segers, A., Simpson, I. J., Shi, H., Smith, S. J., Steele, L. P., Thornton, B. F., Tian, H., Tohjima, Y., Tubiello, F. N., Tsuruta, A., Viovy, N., Voulgarakis, A., Weber, T. S., van Weele, M., van der Werf, G. R., Weiss, R. F., Worthy, D., Wunch, D., Yin, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zhang, Z., Zhao, Y., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1561–1623, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Saunois, M., Martinez, A., Poulter, B., Zhang, Z., Raymond, P. A., Regnier, P., Canadell, J. G., Jackson, R. B., Patra, P. K., Bousquet, P., Ciais, P., Dlugokencky, E. J., Lan, X., Allen, G. H., Bastviken, D., Beerling, D. J., Belikov, D. A., Blake, D. R., Castaldi, S., Crippa, M., Deemer, B. R., Dennison, F., Etiope, G., Gedney, N., Höglund-Isaksson, L., Holgerson, M. A., Hopcroft, P. O., Hugelius, G., Ito, A., Jain, A. K., Janardanan, R., Johnson, M. S., Kleinen, T., Krummel, P. B., Lauerwald, R., Li, T., Liu, X., McDonald, K. C., Melton, J. R., Mühle, J., Müller, J., Murguia-Flores, F., Niwa, Y., Noce, S., Pan, S., Parker, R. J., Peng, C., Ramonet, M., Riley, W. J., Rocher-Ros, G., Rosentreter, J. A., Sasakawa, M., Segers, A., Smith, S. J., Stanley, E. H., Thanwerdas, J., Tian, H., Tsuruta, A., Tubiello, F. N., Weber, T. S., van der Werf, G. R., Worthy, D. E. J., Xi, Y., Yoshida, Y., Zhang, W., Zheng, B., Zhu, Q., Zhu, Q., and Zhuang, Q.: Global Methane Budget 2000–2020, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 1873–1958, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-1873-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schaefer, H., Fletcher, S. E. M., Veidt, C., Lassey, K. R., Brailsford, G.
W., Bromley, T. M., Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Miller, J. B., Levin, I., Lowe, D. C., Martin, R. J., Vaughn, B. H., and White, J. W. C.: A 21st-century shift from fossil-fuel to biogenic methane emissions indicated by <sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub>, Science, 352, 80–84, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2705" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2705</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schwietzke, S., Sherwood, O. A., Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Miller, J. B., Etiope, G., Dlugokencky, E. J., Michel, S. E., Arling, V. A., Vaughn, B. H., White, J. W. C., and Tans, P. P.: Upward revision of global fossil fuel methane emissions based on isotope database, Nature, 538, 88–91,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19797</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sherwood, O. A., Schwietzke, S., Arling, V. A., and Etiope, G.: Global Inventory of Gas Geochemistry Data from Fossil Fuel, Microbial and Burning Sources, version 2017, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 639–656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-639-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-639-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shyamsundar, P., Springer, N. P., Tallis, H., Polasky, S., Jat, M. L.,
Sidhu, H. S., Krishnapriya, P. P., Skiba, N., Ginn, W., Ahuja, V., Cummins,
J., Datta, I., Dholakia, H. H., Dixon, J., Farrell, P., Gonzalez-Abraham,
C., Tittonell, P., Leisher, C., Mandle, L., Mulligan, M., Naeem, S.,
Ricketts, T. H., Wunder, S., and Zhang, W.: Fields on fire: Alternatives to
crop residue burning in India, Science, 365, 536–538,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw4085" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw4085</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snover, A. K. and Quay, P. D.: Hydrogen and carbon kinetic isotope effects
during soil uptake of atmospheric methane, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14,
25–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900089</a>, 2000.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stavert, A. R., Saunois, M., Canadell, J. G., Poulter, B., Jackson, R. B., Regnier, P., Lauerwald, R., Raymond, P. A., Allen, G. H., Patra, P. K., Bergamaschi, P., Bousquet, P., Chandra, N., Ciais, P., Gustafson, A., Ishizawa, M., Ito, A., Kleinen, T., Maksyutov, S., Joe McNorton, J. R., Melton, Müller, J., Niwa, Y., Peng, S., Riley, W. J., Segers, A., Tian, H., Tsuruta, A., Yin, Y., Zhang, Z., Zheng, B., and Zhuang, Q.: Regional trends and drivers of the global methane budget, Glob. Change Biol., 28, 182–200, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15901" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15901</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stell, A. C., Douglas, P. M. J., Rigby, M., and Ganesan, A. L.: The impact
of spatially varying wetland source signatures on the atmospheric
variability of <i>δ</i>D-CH<sub>4</sub>, Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 379, 20200442,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2020.0442</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stevenson, D. S., Zhao, A., Naik, V., O'Connor, F. M., Tilmes, S., Zeng, G., Murray, L. T., Collins, W. J., Griffiths, P. T., Shim, S., Horowitz, L. W., Sentman, L. T., and Emmons, L.: Trends in global tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime since 1850 from AerChemMIP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12905–12920, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12905-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thompson, R. L., Nisbet, E. G., Pisso, I., Stohl, A., Blake, D.,
Dlugokencky, E. J., Helmig, D., and White, J. W. C.: Variability in
Atmospheric Methane From Fossil Fuel and Microbial Sources Over the Last
Three Decades, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 11499–11508,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078127</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Turner, A. J., Frankenberg, C., Wennberg, P. O., and Jacob, D. J.: Ambiguity in the causes for decadal trends in atmospheric methane and hydroxyl, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 5367–5372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616020114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tyler, S. C., Brailsford, G. W., Yagi, K., Minami, K., and Cicerone, R. J.:
Seasonal variations in methane flux and <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>CH<sub>4</sub> values for rice
paddies in Japan and their implications, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 8, 1–12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93GB03123</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tyler, S. C., Rice, A. L., and Ajie, H. O.: Stable isotope ratios in
atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub>: Implications for seasonal sources and sinks, J. Geophys.
Res., 112, D03303, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007231" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007231</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Uveges, B. T., Howarth, R. W., and Sparks, J. P.: Fossil fuel methane
emissions likely underestimated in a model based on atmospheric <i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C trends, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 122, e2507837122,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2507837122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2507837122</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Warwick, N. J., Cain, M. L., Fisher, R., France, J. L., Lowry, D., Michel, S. E., Nisbet, E. G., Vaughn, B. H., White, J. W. C., and Pyle, J. A.: Using
<i>δ</i><sup>13</sup>C-CH<sub>4</sub> and <i>δ</i>D-CH<sub>4</sub> to constrain Arctic methane emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14891–14908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14891-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14891-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Worden, J. R., Bloom, A. A., Pandey, S., Jiang, Z., Worden, H. M., Walker, T. W., Houweling, S., and Röckmann, T.: Reduced biomass burning emissions reconcile conflicting estimates of the post-2006 atmospheric methane budget, Nat. Commun., 8, 2227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02246-0</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
