<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-8275-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Ozone formation sensitivity based on the secondary formaldehyde-to-nitrogen dioxide ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) derived from ground-based remote sensing measurements and a chemical transport model</article-title><alt-title>Ozone formation sensitivity based on the FNR<sub>sec</sub></alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Chi</surname><given-names>Nguyen Doan Thien</given-names></name>
          <email>nguyen.doanthienchi@nies.go.jp</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6076-928X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Tanimoto</surname><given-names>Hiroshi</given-names></name>
          <email>tanimoto@nies.go.jp</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5424-9923</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Inomata</surname><given-names>Satoshi</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8971-0740</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Ikeda</surname><given-names>Kohei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Yange</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2185-6372</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Uning</surname><given-names>Royston</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6598-6889</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Fujinawa</surname><given-names>Tamaki</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3506-0137</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Astrid</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9500-8475</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Fujiwara</surname><given-names>Masatomo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5567-4692</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Kato</surname><given-names>Shungo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Takashima</surname><given-names>Hisahiro</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5267-0792</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Faculty of Science and Technology, University Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS,  88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Faculty of Urban Environmental Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University,  1-1 Minami-Osawa, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-0397, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Faculty of Science, Fukuoka University, 8-19-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Nguyen Doan Thien Chi (nguyen.doanthienchi@nies.go.jp) and Hiroshi Tanimoto (tanimoto@nies.go.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>8275</fpage><lpage>8294</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>14</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>22</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Nguyen Doan Thien Chi et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e234">Sensitivity analysis is essential for developing effective ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mitigation strategies. This study aims to extensively investigate the diurnal, seasonal, and vertical chemical sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a photochemical indicator, the secondary formaldehyde (HCHO)-to-nitrogen dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as measured by Pandora remote-sensing spectrometers located across Japan. Region-specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thresholds were determined using the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. Surface concentrations and vertical column amounts of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were obtained from in situ measurements and Pandora spectrometers. The concentrations of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varied with season and altitude. Moreover, external pollution transport affected the vertical profiles and likely contributed to elevated concentrations. During exceedance events, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity analysis showed that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited conditions were dominant in summer, transitional regimes in spring and fall. Vertically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited conditions typically formed near the surface layers, followed by transitional regimes in the mid-levels, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regimes aloft. Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mitigation strategies should target not only the surface level but also elevated altitudes. This study contributes to fostering a comprehensive understanding of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity in the troposphere using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved from Pandora measurements.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Japan Science and Technology Agency</funding-source>
<award-id>JPMJSP2125</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e402">Tropospheric ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a central secondary pollutant formed through photochemical reactions involving its main precursors: nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including NO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the presence of sunlight. Increases in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels negatively affect human health (Liu et al., 2018; Nuvolone et al., 2018), crop productivity (Mahmood et al., 2020; Ramya et al., 2023), and ecosystems (Feng et al., 2021; Grulke and Heath, 2020). Due to its well-known impacts, enormous efforts have been made in many cities and countries to mitigate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution (Hu et al., 2024; Chang et al., 2025; Shi et al., 2025). A major challenge that hinders <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution mitigation strategy is that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation results from non-linear photochemical reactions of its precursors, rather than from direct emissions (Mishra et al., 2024; Sadanaga et al., 2017). Internally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production is initiated by the formation of peroxyl radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), generated through reactions between VOCs and hydroxyl radical (OH). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is subsequently produced when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) react with NO, leading to radical propagation (Kleinman et al., 2001; Sillman and He, 2002). The radical termination proceeds control the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. These proceeds occur either through the reaction of OH with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form nitric acid (referred as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or through radical-radical reactions (referred as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LRO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Schroeder et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d2e594">Sensitivity analysis is of significant importance for developing effective <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mitigation strategies. Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production is conventionally categorized into three regimes: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited (or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitive) regime, transitional regime, and radical-limited (also referred to as VOC-limited, VOC-sensitive, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-saturated) regime. Depending on the sensitivity regime, controlling either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or VOC emissions can be an effective approach to mitigating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution. Sensitivity analyses have been conducted using various approaches, including model-based methods (Thorp et al., 2021), absolute sensitivity analysis (Sakamoto et al., 2019), and photochemical indicators such as the formaldehyde-to-nitrogen dioxide ratio (FNR) (Jung et al., 2022; Qian et al., 2024; Souri et al., 2023b), the robust <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Hammer, et al., 2002; Souri et al., 2023a), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LRO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Abdi-Oskouei et al., 2022; Schroeder et al., 2017). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation sensitivity can be visually represented using empirical kinetics modeling approach (EKMA) that produces curves between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs (Tonnesen and Dennis, 2000). However, measuring hundreds of VOC species is impractical. Meanwhile, HCHO reflects the VOC oxidation strength and is widely used as a proxy for VOCs reactivity (Irie et al., 2021). It should be noted that only secondary HCHO, produced photochemically from VOCs, accurately reflects the VOC oxidation capacity (Xue et al., 2022). Primary HCHO is directly emitted from anthropogenic activities; therefore, considering primary HCHO may be misleading in the assessment of VOCs reactivity. Previously, the HCHO-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio was used as an indicator of the chemical sensitivity. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> consists of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HONO, organic nitrates, etc.). The HCHO-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio has been proposed as a better indicator because HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have similar lifetimes and better represent the competition for OH radicals (Santiago et al., 2021; Tonnesen and Dennis, 2000). The FNR has inherent limitations in representing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry because it does not account for other atmospheric dimensions, such as photolysis rates and water vapor (Souri et al., 2023a, 2026). A wide transition/ambiguous range of FNR values has been reported compared with the more precise <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LRO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (Schroeder et al., 2017). Consequently, under certain conditions, especially under low photolysis rates, FNR may misclassify <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation sensitivity. Nonetheless, FNR remains a commonly used indicator because it can be readily obtained. In this study, we discuss the application of FNR under conditions of strong photolysis rates to minimize potential misclassification.</p>
      <p id="d2e861"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation occurs not only at the surface but also at elevated altitudes in the troposphere (Hu et al., 2024). Moreover, due to atmospheric convection, elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be dispersed downward to the near-surface layer (Souri et al., 2021). Indeed, study of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production within the planetary boundary layer (PBL) is more important than at the surface alone. VOCs, such as isoprene emitted from vegetation, can be vertically transported to higher layer, where they produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and secondarily formed HCHO through photochemical processes. The vertical distributions of HCHO is therefore primarily driven by vertical transport and chemistry, which complicates the vertical formation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Souri et al., 2023b). To investigate the vertical sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation, previous studies have employed column FNR observed by multi-axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) (Irie et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021; Ryan et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2025). Other studies have applied satellite-based techniques to assess the spatial sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation (Duncan et al., 2010; Jin et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2022). By combining satellite and ground-based remote sensing, column FNR sheds light on the development of spatially and temporally targeted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mitigation strategies.</p>
      <p id="d2e952">The Pandora instrument is a passive UV-VIS spectrometer that observes solar photons over the 280–530 nm spectral range (Herman et al., 2009). The Pandonia Global Network (PGN) is a joint project supported by NASA and ESA, providing real-time, standardized, calibrated, and verified air quality data along with associated uncertainty estimates (<uri>https://www.pandonia-global-network.org/</uri>, last access: 1 September 2025). With more than 200 operational stations worldwide, the PGN has been widely applied in atmospheric research. In particular, due to their high accuracy, Pandora instruments have served as Fiducial Reference Measurement (FRM) for validating satellite observations (Douros et al., 2023; Judd et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2023) and airborne spectrometers (Choo et al., 2023; Judd et al., 2019). Additionally, Pandora observations have successfully highlighted the seasonal and diurnal variations of air pollutants (Herman and Mao, 2025; Liu et al., 2024). Mouat et al. (2024) reported a complex, heterogeneous environment near an airport using Pandora data. With its two viewing geometries, namely direct-sun and sky-scan modes, Pandora quantitatively observes total column amounts and lower tropospheric column amounts of several trace gases, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cede et al., 2021a, b). Furthermore, the instrument provides both column and vertical distribution information, making it appropriate for investigating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation sensitivity. Nevertheless, no studies have employed Pandora to analyze <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation sensitivity.</p>
      <p id="d2e1003">Increased levels of air pollution not only influence health but also place a burden on socioeconomic costs and healthcare resources (Xu et al., 2025). Japan is facing the problem of an aging population that is more vulnerable to air pollution. A modeling study predicted that 80 % of Japan's population could be exposed to the highest levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between 2030 and 2050 if no climate change mitigation policies are implemented (Chen et al., 2024). Looking back on history, the first episode of photochemical air pollution occurred in 1970, leading to the hospitalization of schoolchildren and high school students (Akimoto, 2017). In response, the government has implemented stringent emission controls since the 1980s, leading to a 56 % reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a 50 % reduction in VOCs emissions from 2000 to 2019 (Chatani et al., 2023). Despite the emission reductions, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level remain unpredictable due to non-linear photochemical processes and an increase in transboundary transport (Akimoto, 2017; Irie et al., 2021). Therefore, extensive studies on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation are needed to more efficiently mitigate human exposure.</p>
      <p id="d2e1050">In this study, we first utilized both Pandora direct-sun and sky-scan modes to analyze <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation sensitivity at different altitudes and latitudes across Japan. The Japan Pandora Network (JPN), as part of the PGN, has established more than 10 stations, providing real-time vertical measurements. Because FNR threshold values depend on the study region, meteorological conditions, and emissions, we applied the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model to determine region-specific FNR thresholds for Japan. To improve accuracy, we accounted for secondary HCHO contributions. The findings of this study provide scientific insights into the application of Pandora measurements for mitigating regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Surface measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1090">To obtain surface concentrations of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we conducted in situ measurements at Tokyo Metropolitan University (Tokyo-TMU) during the summer (1–19 July) and fall (17–31 October) of 2022. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured using a cavity attenuated phase shift (CAPS) analyzer, which directly detects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by measuring absorption around 450 nm, with a detection limit of less than 0.1 ppb (Choi et al., 2020). Meanwhile, HCHO was obtained using a selected ion flow tube mass spectrometer (SIFT-MS). SIFT-MS utilizes precursor ions such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for ionization and detection of target substances (Langford et al., 2023; Roberts et al., 2022). This instrument is recommended as an efficient method for the measurement of HCHO in both indoor and outdoor environments (Zogka et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e1168">Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were obtained from nearby air monitoring stations using the UV absorption method. These stations are operated by the Atmospheric Environmental Regional Observation System (AEROS) (<uri>https://soramame.env.go.jp/</uri>, last access: 24 July 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Tropospheric column amounts and vertical profiles derived from Pandora observations</title>
      <p id="d2e1193">Pandora spectrometer consists of a head sensor, an optical fiber transmission system, and a charge-coupled device (CCD) used as a spectral detector. The data retrieval begins with the raw measurement spectra (L0). The corrected signal (L1) is obtained by applying complex corrections, such as dark correction, latency correction, etc. Spectral fitting (L2Fit) is performed to derive slant column densities relative to a reference spectrum using the differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) method. Finally, L2 data is produced by converting slant columns into vertical columns utilizing geometrical air mass factors (AMFs) for the direct-sun mode and analytical methods for the sky-scan mode (Rawat et al., 2025). The direct-sun mode measures total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column with high precision (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecules</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and accuracy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecules</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For total HCHO column, a statistical error of 6 % and a systematic error of 26 % have been reported (Spinei et al., 2018). The bias of the sky-scan measurement is approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecules</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecules</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for HCHO (Tirpitz et al., 2021; Verhoelst et al., 2021). In this study, we explored both the tropospheric column FNR and vertical FNR profile by combining the direct-sun and sky-scan modes of Pandora. In the direct-sun mode, the tropospheric columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO were derived by subtracting the stratospheric contribution. This stratospheric information was derived from the GEOS-Chem model (Sect. 2.3). In addition to column densities in the lower troposphere (up to an altitude of 3 km), the sky-scan measurements provided vertical distributions from the surface up to an altitude of 3 km with several layers of measurements. These profiles are crucial for examining the vertical characteristics of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO, as well as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e1385">We used the Pandora data at four JPN stations, Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka. These stations, listed from north to south, were chosen to investigate FNR across different latitude environments. A brief description of these Pandora stations is provided in Table S1 in the Supplement. These Pandora instruments routinely alternate between direct-sun and sky-scan modes on a standard schedule (Cede et al., 2021a). Data processing was performed using the Blick software, which converts L0 (raw measurement spectra) to L2 products (e.g., vertical column densities, profiles, etc.). For FNR calculations, L2 products were employed. To maximize the available scientific data, we applied a new filtering method adopted from Rawat et al. (2025). The cut-off values were defined as the mean plus three standard deviations of the independence uncertainty for data with a high-quality flag. Data with independence uncertainty exceeding the cut-off value was removed. We also excluded data with a solar zenith angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(SZA)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mouat et al., 2024). Using this filtering method, the data volume increased significantly by 5 %–30 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 20 %–70 % for HCHO, compared to the filtering method that uses high and medium data quality flags.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Model simulations and determination of FNR thresholds</title>
      <p id="d2e1421">To characterize the FNR thresholds, we investigated the response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to emission perturbations using the GEOS-Chem model. GEOS-Chem is a three-dimensional chemical transport model driven by assimilated meteorological observations from the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) of the NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) (<uri>http://www.geos-chem.org</uri>, last access: 29 May 2025). To simulate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the year 2022, we used the high-performance GEOS-Chem (GCHP) model, version 14.4.0 (The International GEOS-Chem User Community, 2024). GCHP is described by Eastham et al. (2018). Improved advection, resolution, performance, and community access are described by Martin et al. (2022). In the current study, we configured four model runs.</p>
      <p id="d2e1460">For Run-1, global anthropogenic emissions were based on the Community Emissions Data System version 2 (CEDSv2) (McDuffie et al., 2020). We used the Regional Emission inventory in ASia version 3.2.1 (REASv3.2.1) (Kurokawa and Ohara, 2020), as the regional anthropogenic emissions override the global anthropogenic emissions for Japan. Biomass burning emissions were taken from the Global Fire Emissions Database version 4 (GFED4) (Van Der Werf et al., 2017). Additionally, dust, sea salt aerosol, soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and biogenic VOCs emissions were computed offline (Weng et al., 2020). All emissions were configured at run-time using Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO, version 3.9.3) (Lin et al., 2021). Table S2  provides a detailed description of the emission inventories used in the model simulation. For meteorology, we used MERRA-2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.625</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), a global atmospheric reanalysis data product. The full-chem model simulations use chemical mechanism kinetics following JPL/IUPAC recommendations (Bates et al., 2024). Photolysis frequencies for stratospheric and tropospheric chemistry are calculated with Cloud-J v7.7.3 (Prather, 2015). Stratospheric chemistry is represented by a linear chemistry mechanism, the Linoz algorithm (McLinden et al., 2000). The Linoz stratospheric chemistry package is recommended for GEOS-Chem simulations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. More details on the chemical mechanisms are available at <uri>http://www.geos-chem.org</uri> (last access: 29 May 2025). In our study, the simulations were run using a 10 min time step for chemistry and a 5 min time step for transport. Moreover, we applied the grid-stretching capability to focus on the Japan region. The grid-stretching procedure followed Bindle et al. (2021), with an initial cubed-sphere grid of C90, a target latitude of 37°, a target longitude of 137°, and a stretch factor of 4. This procedure yielded an average horizontal resolution of 27.78 km over Japan. The simulation generated the vertical extent from the surface to approximately 80 km with a 72 vertical-layer grid. Surface concentrations were obtained from the first model layer. The tropospheric column and the stratospheric column were separated using tropopause information. Furthermore, this troposphere-stratosphere distribution was used to derive the tropospheric column from the Pandora direct-sun observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1515">Run-2 was the same as Run-1 but with all anthropogenic HCHO emissions turned off. Secondary HCHO reflects the VOCs activity through photolysis reactions. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of separating secondary HCHO from anthropogenic HCHO for a more accurate interpretation of the FNR (Hong et al., 2022; Xing et al., 2022; Xue et al., 2022). By comparing Run-1 and Run-2, we determined the contribution of primary HCHO and excluded it from the FNR calculation.</p>
      <p id="d2e1518">Run-3 and Run-4 were the same as Run-2 but with a 20 % reduction in regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions, respectively. Ozone concentrations result from both in situ photochemical creation and external transport processes (Hong et al., 2022; Qian et al., 2024). A key advantage of the model-based method is that it allows us to exclude external transport processes, leading to a more precise classification of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemical regime. The external <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transport influence was eliminated by subtracting Run-3 or Run-4 from Run-2. This step further reflects the response of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs. Figure S1 in the Supplement shows an example of the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> response to VOC and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reductions, resulting from GEOS-Chem simulations. Both negative and positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes were observed in response to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reduction. In contrast, VOC emission reduction consistently led to decreases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. The Greater Tokyo Metropolitan Area was strongly influenced by these emission perturbations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1633">Regarding the responses, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity regime was categorized following the method of Jin et al. (2017) and Jung et al. (2022). Instead of the term VOC-limited regime, here we used the term “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime” for more accuracy present for the radical-limited regime. A negative change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> owing to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reduction indicates a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime. A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime is defined when the positive change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> owing to VOC emission reduction is smaller than that from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reduction. The FNR threshold values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regimes were determined as those corresponding to the 95th percentile of the cumulative probability distribution for each regime.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Model simulations of HCHO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>3.1.1</label><title>Comparison with in situ and Pandora measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1792">The correlation statistics between the GEOS-Chem simulations (Run-1) and in situ measurements are shown in Fig. 1, and those with Pandora are shown in Fig. 2. The GEOS-Chem simulations underestimated the surface HCHO concentrations, with a slope of 0.37, a correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.32, and a root mean square error (RMSE) of 1.56 ppbv. Meanwhile, the GEOS-Chem overestimated the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations, with a slope of 1.34, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>RMSE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv. However, the GEOS-Chem simulations aligned better with the Pandora tropospheric column densities. Specifically, the correlation coefficients between GEOS-Chem and Pandora for HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.51 and 0.56, respectively, for Sapporo, 0.87 and 0.72 for Tsukuba-NIES, 0.78 and 0.54 for Tokyo-TMU, and 0.69 and 0.70 for Fukuoka. The RMSE varied from 2.99 to 5.93 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for HCHO and from 2.11 to 5.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The surface conditions are likely more complex compared to the tropospheric column, which could explain why the GEOS-Chem model imperfectly captured the surface characteristics. Additionally, the local emission inventory implemented in the model was based on the year 2015, which might cause a significant bias in the model results. The diurnal cycles of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated by the GEOS-Chem model were compared with in situ measurements (Fig. S2) and Pandora (Fig. S3). The GEOS-Chem model successfully reproduced the surface diurnal cycle of HCHO. For surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the simulation captured the diurnal cycle in October quite well, but dramatically overestimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations in July. Both the Pandora observations and the GEOS-Chem simulations showed a midday decrease in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns. The GEOS-Chem model also simulated the growth in HCHO from the morning; however, it showed a slight decrease after 14:00 JST. A larger difference between the model and Pandora was observed at Tokyo-TMU, where primary HCHO emissions are significant.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1941">Scatter plots of the surface HCHO <bold>(a)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold> comparing in situ measurements with GEOS-Chem model simulation at Tokyo-TMU. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents GEOS-Chem simulations, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis represents in situ observations. The dashed line indicates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f01.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1996">Scatter plots of tropospheric vertical column densities of HCHO (top panels) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (bottom panels) between the Pandora direct-sun measurements and GEOS-Chem model simulations. The dashed line indicates the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2029">For surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we compared the GEOS-Chem model performance with in situ measurements from nearby air monitoring stations at the four Pandora locations. The GEOS-Chem simulation was able to reproduce the inverted U-shaped pattern of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but showed positive biases (15–25 ppbv) (Fig. 3). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depletion during nighttime was not well generated by the GEOS-Chem model, resulting in overestimated concentrations during photochemical periods. The faster nighttime depletion rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Tokyo-TMU and Tsukuba-NIES suggests stronger deposition, which was not reflected by the model simulation. High positive biases in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been reported in the literature (Travis et al., 2016; Travis and Jacob, 2019). The diurnal variations in mixed-layer dynamics and ozone deposition velocities in the model are one of the key factors contributing to this bias (Travis and Jacob, 2019). However, GEOS-Chem generally captured the observed variations in daytime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, such as large fluctuations at Tokyo-TMU and Tsukuba-NIES, and narrower variations at Fukuoka and Sapporo. The agreement between model simulation and in situ measurements was moderate, with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.56, 0.61, 0.53, and 0.59 for Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka, respectively. Overall, the GEOS-Chem model could capture <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production at the study locations, indicating its suitability for investigating the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity regime.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2130">Comparison of hourly surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the GEOS-Chem model and in situ measurements at the study locations. The top-row panels show scatterplots with linear regression equations. The bottom-row panels present the diurnal cycles of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with shaded error bands indicating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>3.1.2</label><title>Contribution of secondary HCHO</title>
      <p id="d2e2179">Table 1 shows the contributions of secondary HCHO at the study locations, derived from the GEOS-Chem simulations. We only considered daytime simulation from 08:00 to 16:00, when photochemical reactions actively occur. Basically, secondary HCHO contributed the majority at the surface level, with values of 86 %, 87 %, 76 %, and 90 % at Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka, respectively. The contribution of primary HCHO was slightly higher at Tokyo-TMU (24 %). The secondary HCHO contribution increased in summer and decreased in winter. A diurnal variation of the contribution of secondary HCHO was observed, with the highest contribution around noon (not shown). For the tropospheric column, the seasonal contribution of secondary HCHO remained consistent. Additionally, the secondary HCHO contribution increased with altitude (Fig. S4a). The contribution at altitudes above 2 km was almost entirely attributed to secondary formation. This vertical distribution depends on primary emission sources, VOC oxidation, and photolysis rates. The higher photolysis frequency above 2 km compared to surface (Fig. S4b) therefore enhanced VOC oxidation as well as the magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. Secondary HCHO effectively represents a proxy for VOC reactivity (Su et al., 2019; Xue et al., 2022). For more accurate FNR calculation, these secondary HCHO contributions from the model simulations were adopted for both in situ and Pandora measurements. The FNR using secondary HCHO is referred to as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This approach is particularly important in areas with a high contribution of primary sources of HCHO, for example, urban and industrial areas.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2207">Contribution of secondary HCHO (%) at the surface level and in the tropospheric columns, obtained from the GEOS-Chem model simulation at the JPN sites. The statistical values were considered only for 8 h daytime simulations (08:00 to 16:00).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center">Location </oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Spring</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Summer</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Fall</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Winter</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Annual average</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Sapporo</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropospheric column</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Tsukuba-NIES</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropospheric column</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">Tokyo-TMU</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropospheric column</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">91</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">93</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1" morerows="1">Fukuoka</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Surface</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">92</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">79</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tropospheric column</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">94</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">97</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Overall levels of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>Surface levels</title>
      <p id="d2e2874">The diurnal plots of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained from in situ measurements at the Tokyo-TMU site are shown in Fig. S2. Near the surface, HCHO concentrations fluctuated within a narrow range of a few ppbv throughout the day. The minimum occurred at mid night, while the peak was observed around noon (in July) or late afternoon (in October). HCHO concentrations are generally expected to be higher in summer due to enhanced photochemical reactions driven by stronger solar irradiance and increased biogenic VOCs emissions from the local flora (Irie et al., 2021). However, interestingly, we found negligible differences in surface HCHO concentrations between July and October. The mean HCHO concentrations in July and October were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.73</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.06</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> ppbv, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e2931">Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were twice as high in October compared to July. In July, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio ranged from 0.90 to 21.10 ppbv, with an average of 5.98 ppbv. In October, the surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 1.24 to 39.13 ppbv, with an average of 9.91 ppbv. Peaks in July were not clearly defined. In contrast, October showed a small peak in the morning and a larger one around 18:00, exhibiting traffic emissions, while minimum concentrations occurred at noon due to photochemical loss. The finding that the diurnal trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was opposite to that of HCHO can be explained by photochemical reactions. These diurnal cycles have been well documented in previous studies (Irie et al., 2011; Itahashi and Irie, 2022).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>Vertical column amounts</title>
      <p id="d2e2986">Figure 4 shows the variation in vertical column density (VCD) of HCHO measured by the Pandora spectrometer in 2022 at the study sites. The highest total VCD was observed at Tokyo-TMU, with a mean value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.30</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.99</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The levels at Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, and Fukuoka were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.84</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.97</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.05</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.05</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.02</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. According to the GEOS-Chem simulations, the contribution of primary HCHO at Tokyo-TMU was higher than that at the other study sites (Table 1), indicating that the elevated column amount at Tokyo-TMU was largely influenced by local emission of anthropogenic sources. Clearly, the HCHO column amounts tended to be higher in summer and lower in winter. As discussed in Sect. 3.2.1, the difference in surface HCHO concentrations between July and October at Tokyo-TMU was not statistically significant. However, the total HCHO VCD measured by Pandora in July (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.47</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.05</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was 1.5 times higher than that in October (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.90</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.05</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Additionally, we found a strong relationship between column densities and surface concentrations, with a correlation of 0.7 for HCHO (Fig. S5). The correlation slope was about three times higher in July than in October, likely due to enhanced HCHO production at higher altitudes during summer. This suggests that column information is essential and complement to surface measurements for fully representing atmospheric HCHO.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3188">Time series plots of vertical column densities of HCHO (left column) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (right column) at the study locations in 2022. Black plus signs represent total column densities derived from the Pandora direct-sun mode, whereas blue dots indicate lower tropospheric columns (up to an altitude of 3 km) derived from the Pandora sky-scan mode. Solid lines show monthly means, and error bars represent standard deviation. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecules</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3257">The lower tropospheric column (up to an altitude of 3 km) of HCHO (obtained from the sky-scan mode) accounted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.14</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.83</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % at Sapporo, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">65.86</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.84</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % at Tsukuba-NIES, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.04</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.76</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % at Tokyo-TMU, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.27</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.66</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % at Fukuoka, relative to the total column amount (obtained from the direct-sun mode). This lower tropospheric contribution was dominant in summer, ranging from 61.27 % to 71.65 %, and decreased in winter, varying from 32.92 % to 54.93 %. However, it should be noted the error budget in Pandora direct-sun HCHO (Spinei et al., 2018). This error budget can overestimate the total column density. The diurnal cycle of the tropospheric HCHO column is shown in Fig. S3. The tropospheric column measured by Pandora exhibited a continuous increase from the morning to the afternoon. The accumulation of HCHO and the decreasing rate of photolysis in the afternoon can explain this daily cycle of HCHO (Souri et al., 2023b; Zhang et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d2e3347">In contrast to the HCHO trend, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column amounts reached their minimum in summer (Fig. 4). Tokyo-TMU was also polluted with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.73</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.99</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.55</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.52</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.80</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.17</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer), followed by Tsukuba-NIES with an average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.33</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.83</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.42</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in winter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.84</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer). The total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs at Sapporo and Fukuoka were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.92</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.22</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pmolec</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The lower tropospheric column contributed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">51.38</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.95</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.06</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.55</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.79</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> %, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56.29</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.83</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % to the total column at Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka, respectively. We also found good agreement for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between lower tropospheric column densities and surface concentrations, with a correlation of 0.6 (Fig. S5). The slope was similar in July and October, reflecting that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly concentrated near the surface.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS3">
  <label>3.2.3</label><title>Vertical profiles</title>
      <p id="d2e3799">The Pandora sky-scan mode measures scattered sunlight at several angles, yielding the vertical profiles. The resolution of the vertical profiles depends on the number of scanning angles, referred to as elevation scan routines (i.e., detailed elevation scan and quick elevation scan). Here, we used detailed elevation scans around noon to investigate the vertical distribution of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The detailed elevation scan routine observes 14 angles without using filter and 12 angles using the U340 filter, respectively (Rawat et al., 2025). We converted these partial vertical columns to mixing ratios, assuming well-mixed conditions in each layer and the ideal gas law. To obtain the seasonal vertical distributions of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, after extrapolating into 0.1 km bins, the profiles were averaged by altitude. Since the altitudes of these four Pandora stations ranged from 45 to 135 m, and the maximum vertical sensitivity of the sky-scan mode was generally within 2 km, we only considered the vertical profile from 0.2 to 2 km. Figures 5 and 6 present the seasonal and time-series vertical profiles of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3837">Seasonal (first column) and time series (second column) vertical profiles of HCHO derived from the Pandora sky-scan observations around noon (12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 02:00). The seasonal vertical profiles are shaded with error bands indicating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error. Color bars exhibit HCHO mixing ratio.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3865">Seasonal (first column) and time series (second column) vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the Pandora sky-scan observations around noon (12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 02:00). The seasonal vertical profiles are shaded with error bands indicating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard error. Color bars exhibit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3914">The HCHO productions were significantly enhanced during summer due to stronger solar intensity and increased biogenic VOCs emissions such as isoprene. Secondary HCHO is associated with isoprene emitted from vegetation (Ryan et al., 2023). Isoprene emissions exhibit a markedly positive exponential relationship with temperature (Ryan et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2024). At higher temperatures in summer, more isoprene is emitted, which triggers the formation of secondary HCHO. The higher HCHO production at Tsukuba-NIES and Tokyo-TMU compared to Fukuoka suggests that, in addition to biogenic VOCs, anthropogenic VOCs play an important role in HCHO production (Fig. S6). Anthropogenic VOC emission accounted for 20 % of the total emission at the two locations. The summertime increase in anthropogenic VOCs emissions is likely driven by enhanced evaporation processes (Wu et al., 2024). The vertical variation of HCHO appeared to be relatively heterogeneous in winter. However, we found less significant changes in the seasonal profiles at the highest latitude site (Sapporo). Vertically, HCHO formation was observed up to 2 km, which is consistent with previous studies (Lin et al., 2022; Shi et al., 2025). HCHO extended to higher altitudes could be attributed to vertical and horizontal transport and chemistry (Souri et al., 2023b). For a more accurate FNR analysis, it is essential to consider not only surface but also elevated measurements (Souri et al., 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e3917">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distributions more rapidly decreased with increasing altitude compared to HCHO. Unlike HCHO, the bulk of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was generally concentrated below 1 km because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are mainly near the surface (i.e., traffic). Normally, the vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile was enhanced in winter. However, we also observed several spikes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during summer at Tsukuba-NIES. Generally, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are low in summer because of photochemical loss. The enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles observed at Tsukuba-NIES during summer could be attributed to the transport of emissions from surrounding regions. Irie et al. (2021) reported that summertime air masses passing over Tokyo Bay area and reaching Tsukuba lead to a greater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations at this site.</p>
      <p id="d2e4009">To investigate whether any external transport affected the vertical profiles, we applied the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model for the Tsukuba-NIES case. The model, developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Air Resources Laboratory (ARL), has been widely used for atmospheric trajectory and dispersion calculations (Stein et al., 2015). We simulated 48 h backward trajectories for the year 2022, with endpoints at 13:00 local time (JST) at Tsukuba-NIES, as a case study. The backward trajectories were assigned into four clusters: c1, c2, c3, and c4. The number of clusters was optimized using total spatial variance (TSV) analysis. The cluster frequencies were 15 %, 40 %, 36 %, and 9 % for c1, c2, c3, and c4, respectively (Fig. S7). Figure S8 shows the vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Tsukuba-NIES during summer as a function of air mass clusters. During summer, cluster c1 occurred on only one day, clusters c2, c3, and c4 occurred on 34, 33, and 24 d, respectively. Thus, we observed elevated in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles during cluster c4, in which air masses passed through urban Tokyo and industrial areas, transporting anthropogenic pollutants to the Tsukuba-NIES site. This suggests that external pollution transport affected the vertical distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Identification of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity regime</title>
      <p id="d2e4077">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> outputs from the GEOS-Chem model simulations were utilized to identify the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity regime (Fig. 7). From the scatter plots, the responses of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emission reductions at Sapporo and Fukuoka were within 5 ppbv, which were less pronounced than those at Tsukuba-NIES and Tokyo-TMU (within 10 ppbv). A positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference indicates that the emission reduction results in a decrease in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Conversely, a negative difference means that the emission reduction enhances surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. In our study, generally, VOC emission reductions led to a decrease in surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reductions could either decrease <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through photochemical reaction or increase it due to reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> processes.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4216">Response of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emission perturbations resulting from the GEOS-Chem simulations. The scatter plots depict the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference between GEOS-Chem Run-2 and Run-3 (blue), and between Run-2 and Run-4 (brown), as a function of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first row) and tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second row). The VOC-limited regime was associated with negative change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reduction. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime was identified when the positive change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to VOC emission reductions was smaller than that from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission reductions. Line plots show the cumulative probability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited (blue) and VOC-limited (brown) conditions as a function of surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (third row) and tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (fourth row). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold values (vertical dashed lines) for VOC-limited and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regimes were determined as those corresponding to the 95th percentile (horizontal dashed lines) of the cumulative probability distribution for each regime.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4392">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold values were determined using both surface and column information (Fig. 7, cumulative graphs). Based on surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited conditions were distinguished with thresholds of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Sapporo, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Tsukuba-NIES, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Tokyo-TMU, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Fukuoka. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regimes were associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Sapporo, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka, respectively. The surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thresholds were generally lower than the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The finding of higher column FNR is consistent with previous studies (Jin et al., 2017; Souri et al., 2023a). The column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thresholds for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regimes and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regimes at the Sapporo site were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The corresponding column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold ranges for Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka were 0.74–1.7, 0.62–1.53, and 0.43–1.73, respectively. The transitional regime seemed to occur over a wider range of column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at lower latitudes (e.g., Fukuoka) compared to higher latitudes (e.g., Sapporo). The differences between surface and tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be attributed to the vertical characteristics of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules were concentrated near the surface, while HCHO was present in the higher layers. As a result, surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> did not account for HCHO at higher layers, leading to lower threshold values. The surface and column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thresholds identified in this study are consistent with those reported by Jin et al. (2017) for East Asia (Table 2).</p>
      <p id="d2e4686">For the column, the transition range for Sapporo was defined as 0.86–1.52 where the cumulative probability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited condition reached 95 %, corresponding to a 5 % probability of misclassification. Consequently, 15 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited and 15 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited conditions were incorrectly classified as transitional (Fig. 7). Similarly, the probabilities of misclassifying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited conditions as transitional were 20 % and 25 %, respectively, for Tsukuba-NIES, 35 % and 25 % for Tokyo-TMU, and 15 % and 60 % for Fukuoka. Notably, the probability of misclassification of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited condition at Fukuoka was higher than at the other locations. Because we simulated for the year 2022, this uncertainty could be reduced by extending the model simulations to longer time periods.</p>
      <p id="d2e4767">Table 2 presents the column FNR regime thresholds related to surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity from previous studies. These threshold values vary depending on the methodology, geographic region, and atmospheric conditions. The FNR thresholds using both primary and secondary HCHO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are higher than those using only secondary HCHO (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The transitional regimes are reported for a column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.5–4.0 in Guangzhou, China (Hong et al., 2022), and 1.6–2.6 in United States (Jung et al., 2022), whereas the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> thresholds identified in our study were lower than 2. Column FNR regime threshold values are useful for examining global <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production, as both satellite and ground-based remote sensing techniques offer extensive spatial coverage (Inoue et al., 2019; Ryan et al., 2023; Santiago et al., 2021).</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e4840">Comparison of column FNR threshold values for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity in previous studies using different methods.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Study area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Indicator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Method</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">FNR<sub>total</sub> threshold</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">FNR<sub>sec</sub> threshold</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">values</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">values</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">North America</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS-Chem model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9–1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Jin et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Europe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS-Chem model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9–1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Jin et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">East Asia</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS-Chem mode</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9–1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Jin et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">United States</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CMAQ model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6–2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Jung et al. (2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Guangzhou, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>total</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Polynomial fit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5–4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Hong et al. (2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sapporo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS-Chem model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.86–1.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tsukuba-NIES</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS-Chem model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74–1.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Tokyo-TMU</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS-Chem model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.62–1.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Fukuoka</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GEOS-Chem model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.43–1.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity during exceedance events</title>
      <p id="d2e5254">The diurnal and seasonal cycles of surface and column FNR are shown in Figs. S9 and S10. Surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> developed in the early morning and decreased in the afternoon. During the 8 h daytime period (08:00 to 16:00), the average surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.99</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in July and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> in October. Using tropospheric vertical column densities derived from Pandora sky-scan observations, the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited a higher value compared to those from surface measurements. Like surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grew during the morning. The highest column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values were found during the summer months (JJA). In contrast, these values were normally below 1 in winter (DJF).</p>
      <p id="d2e5367">In this section, we analyze the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation sensitivity focusing on polluted days when the maximum daily 8 h averaged surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (MDA8) exceeded 60 ppbv. We identified 8, 30, 38, and 43 exceedance events in 2022 at Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka, respectively. During <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceedance events, photochemical reactions were typically strong, allowing us to determine the sensitive regime with minimum biases. Because the model simulations did not reproduce surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO as well as the column densities, we will focus only on column FNR. Although Pandora direct-sun mode provides highly accurate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, the HCHO retrieval attains non-negligible error budget, which can cause more uncertainty and bias in the FNR. In contrast, Pandora sky-scan mode provides lower tropospheric columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO and yields lower uncertainty in the HCHO data product. Additionally, the sensitivity diagnosis within the boundary layer is better represent tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production processes. Therefore, we discuss instead the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from Pandora sky-scan observations which is sensitive to the boundary layer. We averaged available sky-scan observations around noon (12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 02:00), when photolysis rates are highest. Figures 8–11 present column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> polluted events at Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka, respectively. The advantage of Pandora observations is the ability to examine daily <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in greater detail and investigate specific periods such as exceedance events. Based on the analysis of these events, policy strategies could be proposed to help mitigate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e5513">Sensitivity analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during MDA8 exceedance events at Sapporo. The top panel presents MDA8 surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with non-exceedance days indicated by black dots and exceedance days shown as red points with grey shadows. Squares depict the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from Pandora sky-scan measurements around local noon (12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 02:00). The bottom panel illustrates the vertical formation sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to exceedance events. The squares and color bars are colored according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold values determined from the GEOS-Chem model.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e5588">Sensitivity analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during MDA8 exceedance events at Tsukuba-NIES. The top panel presents MDA8 surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with non-exceedance days indicated by black dots and exceedance days shown as red points with grey shadows. Squares depict the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from Pandora sky-scan measurements around local noon (12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 02:00). The bottom panel illustrates the vertical formation sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to exceedance events. The squares and color bars are colored according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold values determined from the GEOS-Chem model.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5660">At Sapporo, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations increased during spring (Fig. 8). All eight events with MDA8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceeding 60 ppbv occurred in April and May 2022. Pandora observations were unavailable on 21 and 22 May 2022. Given the transition range determined at Sapporo (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity in transitional and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime. Therefore, reducing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission would be the optimal strategy for mitigating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels. The vertical sensitivity indicated that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime was typically confined to the near surface layer during events classified as transitional using column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Concurrently, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime frequently formed aloft, whereas the transitional regime formed in the mid-levels. Figure S11 illustrates the corresponding HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles for these exceedance events. Higher concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 21 and 22 April, concentrated below 0.5 km, led to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime within this layer. For events categorized as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited (6–7 May) according to the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime dominated at higher altitudes and expanded downward to the surface, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime retreated. Even during periods of high MDA8, the vertical profiles of both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO on 23 April and 6 May were low, suggesting that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be influenced by regional or vertical transport. This influence could be recognized using Pandora HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations; however, further studies are needed to distinguish these events from local photochemical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production.</p>

      <fig id="F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e5918">Sensitivity analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during MDA8 exceedance events at Tokyo-TMU. The top panel presents MDA8 surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with non-exceedance days indicated by black dots and exceedance days shown as red points with grey shadows. Squares depict the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from Pandora sky-scan measurements around local noon (12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 02:00). The bottom panel illustrates the vertical formation sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to exceedance events. The squares and color bars are colored according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold values determined from the GEOS-Chem model.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5990">Figure 9 is similar to Fig. 8, but for Tsukuba-NIES. Compare with Sapporo, more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceedance events were found at Tsukuba-NIES, with 30 events in 2022. These events primarily took place during spring and summer. Like the results at Sapporo, the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited transitional and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited conditions during spring events, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry was almost entirely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited during summer events, likely due to substantial enhancement in HCHO production (Fig. S11). Regarding vertical sensitivity, we determined a lower probability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime during the spring events. During summer events, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation sensitivity throughout the lower troposphere was consistently <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited, consistent with the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> classification. Thus, emission policies focusing on continued reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would effectively improve tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution during summer.</p>
      <p id="d2e6115">The exceedance events of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spanned a broad period from spring through fall at both Tokyo-TMU and Fukuoka (Figs. 10 and 11). The column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were higher during summer leading to a dominant classification in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime. Transitional conditions were observed more frequently during spring and fall. At Tokyo-TMU, only one exceedance event (7 April) was found to be sensitive to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals. The locally elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions on that event shifted the chemical environment downward to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. S12). Vertical sensitivity profiles showed a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime within the lower 1 km on 7–8 April. For Fukuoka, the transitional condition occurred more frequently during the exceedance events, emphasizing the need for simultaneous control strategies targeting both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOCs in this region.</p>

      <fig id="F11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e6210">Sensitivity analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during MDA8 exceedance events at Fukuoka. The top panel presents MDA8 surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with non-exceedance days indicated by black dots and exceedance days shown as red points with grey shadows. Squares depict the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from Pandora sky-scan measurements around local noon (12:00 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 02:00). The bottom panel illustrates the vertical formation sensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponding to exceedance events. The squares and color bars are colored according to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold values determined from the GEOS-Chem model.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8275/2026/acp-26-8275-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SSx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Limitations and future scopes</title>
      <p id="d2e6289">The use of FNR indicator with satellite and ground-based observations can be readily implemented. However, FNR has inherent limitations in inferring the complex interactions among <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production, its precursors, photolysis rates, and water vapor (Jin et al., 2025; Schroeder et al., 2017; Souri et al., 2026; Yang et al., 2026). For example, during the early morning and late afternoon, weak light intensity can lead to large biases in the interpretation of FNR because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production is less sensitive to its precursors under low photolysis conditions. In this study, we minimized the potential biases in predicting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry by using Pandora data under conditions of strong photolysis rates. This may underutilize the rich hourly observations provided by Pandora and geostationary satellites. Jin et al. (2025) developed an approach to link the FNR with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry using a steady-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-VOC model combined with GOES-CF simulations, and applied it to TEMPO observations. Additionally, Souri et al. (2026) optimized the OMI and TROPOMI data to investigate the daily mapping of net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production using a deep neural network approach. A similar approach could also be applied to Pandora data to derive accurate hourly net <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production estimates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e6390">This study demonstrates the use of Pandora measurements to investigate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity. Pandora provides vertical column densities and profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO, which are valuable for a comprehensive understanding of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production in the lower to mid-troposphere. Additionally, with the aid of the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model, we identified the region-specific thresholds to improve sensitivity analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e6426">By applying the grid-stretching capability of the high-performance GEOS-Chem model, the diurnal cycles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were generally well reproduced. The correlation coefficients between the model and in situ surface measurements were 0.48 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.32 for HCHO, and from 0.53 to 0.61 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the tropospheric columns, the correlations between GEOS-Chem and Pandora ranged from 0.54 to 0.72 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and from 0.51 to 0.87 for HCHO.</p>
      <p id="d2e6484">According to the GEOS-Chem simulations, secondary HCHO was the dominant contributor to total HCHO, with its contribution increasing with altitude. Furthermore, the region-specific thresholds for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity regime were identified. The surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values tended to be lower compared to the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> threshold ranges were 0.86–1.52 in Sapporo, 0.74–1.7 in Tsukuba-NIES, 0.62–1.53 in Tokyo-TMU, and 0.43–1.73 in Fukuoka.</p>
      <p id="d2e6531">Using the tropospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FNR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> episodes, the formation regime was found to be mainly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited during summer, due to increasing VOCs emissions and strong photochemical activity. The vertical distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity regimes was also obtained from the Pandora vertical profile. The diagnostics could assist regulators in reducing the frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exceedance events.</p>
      <p id="d2e6590">To mitigate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exposure, particularly for sensitive groups, policymakers should prioritize VOC emission controls near the surface layers in higher-latitude locations. During summertime, greater attention should be paid to controlling local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. Moreover, regional transport of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from large emission sources can contribute to elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited regime is dominant, thereby enhancing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production.</p>
      <p id="d2e6660">The FNR indicator can be readily obtained from both satellite and ground-based observations, enabling quick assessment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry. However, the FNR indicator lacks consideration of other factors, such as photolysis rates and water vapor. For more precise interpretation, future studies should incorporate these indicators and others atmospheric dimensions. The combination of both modeling and machine learning could also be beneficial for the interpretation.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e6679">The Pandora data are available at the PGN website (<uri>https://www.pandonia-global-network.org</uri>, last access: 1 September 2025).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e6685">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8275-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-8275-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6694">NDTC: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing (original draft preparation). HirT: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing (review and editing). SI: Conceptualization, Writing (review and editing). TF, MF, SK, and HisT: Data curation, Writing (review and editing). KI, YD, AM and RU: Writing (review and editing).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6700">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e6706">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e6712">We thank the principal investigators, support staff, and funding for establishing and maintaining the Sapporo, Tsukuba-NIES, Tokyo-TMU, and Fukuoka sites of the PGN used in this investigation. The PGN is a bilateral project supported by funding from NASA and ESA. The model simulations were run using the NIES scalar processing supercomputer (HPE Apollo 2000). We thank Ms. Kimiko Suto (NIES) for managing the air monitoring data. We acknowledge Professor Armin Sorooshian (University of Arizona) for invaluable discussions and suggestions. This work was financially supported by JST SPRING (grant no. JPMJSP2125). Nguyen Doan Thien Chi would like to take this opportunity to thank the “THERS Make New Standards Program for the Next Generation Researchers”.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e6717">This work was financially supported by JST SPRING (grant no. JPMJSP2125).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e6723">This paper was edited by Andreas Hofzumahaus and reviewed by Amir Souri and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abdi-Oskouei, M., Roozitalab, B., Stanier, C. O., Christiansen, M., Pfister, G., Pierce, R. B., McDonald, B. C., Adelman, Z., Janseen, M., Dickens, A. F., and Carmichael, G. R.: The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037042,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037042</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Akimoto, H.: Overview of policy actions and observational data for PM<sub>2.5</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Japan: a study of urban air quality improvement in Asia, JICA-RI Working Paper, 137,  <uri>https://www.jica.go.jp/Resource/jica-ri/publication/workingpaper/l75nbg0000048r3z-att/JICA-RI_WP_No_137.pdf</uri> (last access: 14 April 2025), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bates, K. H., Evans, M. J., Henderson, B. H., and Jacob, D. J.: Impacts of updated reaction kinetics on the global GEOS-Chem simulation of atmospheric chemistry, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1511–1524, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bindle, L., Martin, R. V., Cooper, M. J., Lundgren, E. W., Eastham, S. D., Auer, B. M., Clune, T. L., Weng, H., Lin, J., Murray, L. T., Meng, J., Keller, C. A., Putman, W. M., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.: Grid-stretching capability for the GEOS-Chem 13.0.0 atmospheric chemistry model, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5977–5997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5977-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-5977-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., and Kreuter, M.: Manual for Blick Software Suite 1.8, <uri>https://www.pandonia-global-network.org/assets/manuals/BlickSoftwareSuite_Manual_v1-8-4.pdf</uri> (last access: 29 November 2024), 2021a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., and Spinei, E.: Pandonia Global Network Data Products Readme Document, <uri>https://www.pandonia-global-network.org/assets/manuals/PGN_DataProducts_Readme_v1-8-5.pdf</uri> (last access: 25 September 2024), 2021b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Chang, L.-S., Ahn, S., Bae, M.-S., Park, S.-M., Gil, J., Kim, K.-R., Lee, G., Lee, T., Woo, J.-H., Park, R., Kwon, H.-A., Choo, G.-H., and Song, C.-K.: Role of factors controlling diurnal variation of cold-season formaldehyde during Satellite Integrated Joint Monitoring of Air Quality 2021 campaign, Sci. Total Environ., 960, 178283,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178283" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178283</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Chatani, S., Kitayama, K., Itahashi, S., Irie, H., and Shimadera, H.: Effectiveness of emission controls implemented since 2000 on ambient ozone concentrations in multiple timescales in Japan: An emission inventory development and simulation study, Sci. Total Environ., 894, 165058,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165058</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Z., Sun, L., Huang, L., Xie, Y., Yang, S., Sun, L., Xue, J., and Yan, F.: Inequality of exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and ozone among age groups and cities in Japan in 2030 and 2050, Urban Clim., 55, 101935,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101935</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Choi, S., Lamsal, L. N., Follette-Cook, M., Joiner, J., Krotkov, N. A., Swartz, W. H., Pickering, K. E., Loughner, C. P., Appel, W., Pfister, G., Saide, P. E., Cohen, R. C., Weinheimer, A. J., and Herman, J. R.: Assessment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations during DISCOVER-AQ and KORUS-AQ field campaigns, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2523–2546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2523-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-2523-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Choo, G.-H., Lee, K., Hong, H., Jeong, U., Choi, W., and Janz, S. J.: Highly resolved mapping of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column densities from GeoTASO measurements over a megacity and industrial area during the KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 625–644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-625-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-16-625-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Douros, J., Eskes, H., van Geffen, J., Boersma, K. F., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Blechschmidt, A.-M., Peuch, V.-H., Colette, A., and Veefkind, P.: Comparing Sentinel-5P TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column observations with the CAMS regional air quality ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 509–534, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Duncan, B. N., Yoshida, Y., Olson, J. R., Sillman, S., Martin, R. V., Lamsal, L., Hu, Y., Pickering, K. E., Retscher, C., Allen, D. J., and Crawford, J. H.: Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC controls on surface ozone formation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2213–2223,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Eastham, S. D., Long, M. S., Keller, C. A., Lundgren, E., Yantosca, R. M., Zhuang, J., Li, C., Lee, C. J., Yannetti, M., Auer, B. M., Clune, T. L., Kouatchou, J., Putman, W. M., Thompson, M. A., Trayanov, A. L., Molod, A. M., Martin, R. V., and Jacob, D. J.: GEOS-Chem High Performance (GCHP v11-02c): a next-generation implementation of the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model for massively parallel applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2941–2953, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2941-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-2941-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Feng, Z., Agathokleous, E., Yue, X., Oksanen, E., Paoletti, E., Sase, H., Gandin, A., Koike, T., Calatayud, V., Yuan, X., Liu, X., De Marco, A., Jolivet, Y., Kontunen-Soppela, S., Hoshika, Y., Saji, H., Li, P., Li, Z., Watanabe, M., and Kobayashi, K.: Emerging challenges of ozone impacts on asian plants: actions are needed to protect ecosystem health, Ecosyst. Health Sustain., 7, 1911602,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2021.1911602" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/20964129.2021.1911602</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Grulke, N. E. and Heath, R. L.: Ozone effects on plants in natural ecosystems, Plant Biol., 22, 12–37,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/plb.12971</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Hammer, M.-U., Vogel, B., and Vogel, H.: Findings on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as an indicator of ozone sensitivity in Baden-Württemberg, Berlin-Brandenburg, and the Po valley based on numerical simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000211</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Herman, J. and Mao, J.: Seasonal variation of total column formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone over various Pandora spectrometer sites with a comparison of OMI and diurnally varying DSCOVR-EPIC satellite data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4165–4182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4165-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-4165-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Herman, J., Cede, A., Spinei, E., Mount, G., Tzortziou, M., and Abuhassan, N.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column amounts from ground-based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct-sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 2009JD011848,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD011848</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Hong, Q., Zhu, L., Xing, C., Hu, Q., Lin, H., Zhang, C., Zhao, C., Liu, T., Su, W., and Liu, C.: Inferring vertical variability and diurnal evolution of O3 formation sensitivity based on the vertical distribution of summertime HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 827, 154045,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154045" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154045</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Hu, Q., Ji, X., Hong, Q., Li, J., Li, Q., Ou, J., Liu, H., Xing, C., Tan, W., Chen, J., Chang, B., and Liu, C.: Vertical Evolution of Ozone Formation Sensitivity Based on Synchronous Vertical Observations of Ozone and Proxies for Its Precursors: Implications for Ozone Pollution Prevention Strategies, Environ. Sci. Technol., acs.est.4c00637,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00637" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.4c00637</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Inoue, K., Tonokura, K., and Yamada, H.: Modeling study on the spatial variation of the sensitivity of photochemical ozone concentrations and population exposure to VOC emission reductions in Japan, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 12, 1035–1047,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00720-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11869-019-00720-w</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Irie, H., Takashima, H., Kanaya, Y., Boersma, K. F., Gast, L., Wittrock, F., Brunner, D., Zhou, Y., and Van Roozendael, M.: Eight-component retrievals from ground-based MAX-DOAS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1027–1044, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Irie, H., Yonekawa, D., Damiani, A., Hoque, H. M. S., Sudo, K., and Itahashi, S.: Continuous multi-component MAX-DOAS observations for the planetary boundary layer ozone variation analysis at Chiba and Tsukuba, Japan, from 2013 to 2019, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 8, 31,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00424-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40645-021-00424-9</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Itahashi, S. and Irie, H.: Surface and aloft <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution over the greater Tokyo area observed by ground-based and MAX-DOAS measurements bridged by kilometer-scale regional air quality modeling, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 9, 15,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-022-00474-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40645-022-00474-7</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Jin, X., Fiore, A. M., Murray, L. T., Valin, L. C., Lamsal, L. N., Duncan, B., Folkert Boersma, K., De Smedt, I., Abad, G. G., Chance, K., and Tonnesen, G. S.: Evaluating a Space-Based Indicator of Surface Ozone-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-VOC Sensitivity Over Midlatitude Source Regions and Application to Decadal Trends, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026720" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026720</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Jin, X., Yang, Y., Gonzalez Abad, G., Nowlan, C., and Liu, X.: Observing the Diurnal Variations of Ozone-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-VOC Chemistry Over the U. S. From the Geostationary TEMPO Instrument, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2025GL116394,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL116394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025GL116394</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Judd, L. M., Al-Saadi, J. A., Janz, S. J., Kowalewski, M. G., Pierce, R. B., Szykman, J. J., Valin, L. C., Swap, R., Cede, A., Mueller, M., Tiefengraber, M., Abuhassan, N., and Williams, D.: Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6091–6111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Judd, L. M., Al-Saadi, J. A., Szykman, J. J., Valin, L. C., Janz, S. J., Kowalewski, M. G., Eskes, H. J., Veefkind, J. P., Cede, A., Mueller, M., Gebetsberger, M., Swap, R., Pierce, R. B., Nowlan, C. R., Abad, G. G., Nehrir, A., and Williams, D.: Evaluating Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column densities with airborne and Pandora spectrometers near New York City and Long Island Sound, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6113–6140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6113-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-6113-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Jung, J., Choi, Y., Mousavinezhad, S., Kang, D., Park, J., Pouyaei, A., Ghahremanloo, M., Momeni, M., and Kim, H.: Changes in the ozone chemical regime over the contiguous United States inferred by the inversion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and VOC emissions using satellite observation, Atmos. Res., 270, 106076,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106076</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Kim, S., Kim, D., Hong, H., Chang, L.-S., Lee, H., Kim, D.-R., Kim, D., Yu, J.-A., Lee, D., Jeong, U., Song, C.-K., Kim, S.-W., Park, S. S., Kim, J., Hanisco, T. F., Park, J., Choi, W., and Lee, K.: First-time comparison between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical columns from Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) and Pandora measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3959–3972, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3959-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-16-3959-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Kleinman, L. I., Daum, P. H., Lee, Y., Nunnermacker, L. J., Springston, S. R., Weinstein-Lloyd, J., and Rudolph, J.: Sensitivity of ozone production rate to ozone precursors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2903–2906,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012597" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL012597</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kurokawa, J. and Ohara, T.: Long-term historical trends in air pollutant emissions in Asia: Regional Emission inventory in ASia (REAS) version 3, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12761–12793, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Langford, V. S., Dryahina, K., and Španìl, P.: Robust Automated SIFT-MS Quantitation of Volatile Compounds in Air Using a Multicomponent Gas Standard, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 34, 2630–2645, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.3c00312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jasms.3c00312</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Lin, H., Jacob, D. J., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., Keller, C. A., Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Emmons, L. K., Campbell, P. C., Baker, B., Saylor, R. D., and Montuoro, R.: Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Lin, H., Xing, C., Hong, Q., Liu, C., Ji, X., Liu, T., Lin, J., Lu, C., Tan, W., Li, Q., and Liu, H.: Diagnosis of Ozone Formation Sensitivities in Different Height Layers via MAX-DOAS Observations in Guangzhou, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036803,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD036803</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H., Liu, S., Xue, B., Lv, Z., Meng, Z., Yang, X., Xue, T., Yu, Q., and He, K.: Ground-level ozone pollution and its health impacts in China, Atmos. Environ., 173, 223–230,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Liu, O., Li, Z., Lin, Y., Fan, C., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Zhang, P., Wei, Y., Chen, T., Dong, J., and de Leeuw, G.: Evaluation of the first year of Pandora <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements over Beijing and application to satellite validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 377–395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-377-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-377-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Mahmood, F., Khokhar, M. F., and Mahmood, Z.: Examining the relationship of tropospheric ozone and climate change on crop productivity using the multivariate panel data techniques, J. Environ. Manage., 272, 111024,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111024</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Martin, R. V., Eastham, S. D., Bindle, L., Lundgren, E. W., Clune, T. L., Keller, C. A., Downs, W., Zhang, D., Lucchesi, R. A., Sulprizio, M. P., Yantosca, R. M., Li, Y., Estrada, L., Putman, W. M., Auer, B. M., Trayanov, A. L., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.: Improved advection, resolution, performance, and community access in the new generation (version 13) of the high-performance GEOS-Chem global atmospheric chemistry model (GCHP), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8731–8748, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8731-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-15-8731-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>McDuffie, E., Smith, S., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., and Martin, R.: CEDS_GBD-MAPS: Global Anthropogenic Emission Inventory of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, CO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, NMVOCs, BC, and OC from 1970–2017 (2020_v1.0), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3754964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/ZENODO.3754964</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>McLinden, C. A., Olsen, S. C., Hannegan, B., Wild, O., Prather, M. J., and Sundet, J.: Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models: A simple chemistry and the cross-tropopause flux, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 14653–14665,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900124</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Mishra, M., Chen, P.-H., Lin, G.-Y., Nguyen, T.-T.-N., Le, T.-C., Dejchanchaiwong, R., Tekasakul, P., Shih, S.-H., Jhang, C.-W., and Tsai, C.-J.: Photochemical oxidation of VOCs and their source impact assessment on ozone under de-weather conditions in Western Taiwan, Environ. Pollut., 346, 123662,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123662" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123662</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Mouat, A. P., Spinei, E., and Kaiser, J.: Informing Near-Airport Satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Retrievals Using Pandora Sky-Scanning Observations, ACS EST Air, 1, 1617–1628,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00158" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsestair.4c00158</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., and Voller, F.: The effects of ozone on human health, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 8074–8088,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J.: Photolysis rates in correlated overlapping cloud fields: Cloud-J 7.3c, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2587–2595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Qian, Y., Wang, D., Li, Z., Liu, H., Zhou, H., Dou, K., Xi, L., Tang, F., Si, F., and Luo, Y.: Ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide: Insights into ozone formation sensitivity, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 15, 102285,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2024.102285</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Ramya, A., Dhevagi, P., Poornima, R., Avudainayagam, S., Watanabe, M., and Agathokleous, E.: Effect of ozone stress on crop productivity: A threat to food security, Environ. Res., 236, 116816,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2023.116816</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Rawat, P., Crawford, J. H., Travis, K. R., Judd, L. M., Demetillo, M. A. G., Valin, L. C., Szykman, J. J., Whitehill, A., Baumann, E., and Hanisco, T. F.: Maximizing the scientific application of Pandora column observations of HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2899–2917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2899-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-2899-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, I. J., Carpenter, L. J., Shaw, M. D., and Langford, V. S.: Selected Ion Flow Tube – Mass Spectrometry (SIFT-MS) study of the reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a range of oxygenated volatile organic carbons (OVOCs), Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 479, 116892,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2022.116892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2022.116892</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Ryan, R. G., Marais, E. A., Gershenson-Smith, E., Ramsay, R., Muller, J.-P., Tirpitz, J.-L., and Frieß, U.: Measurement report: MAX-DOAS measurements characterise Central London ozone pollution episodes during 2022 heatwaves, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7121–7139, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7121-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7121-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Sadanaga, Y., Kawasaki, S., Tanaka, Y., Kajii, Y., and Bandow, H.: New System for Measuring the Photochemical Ozone Production Rate in the Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2871–2878,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04639" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.6b04639</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Sakamoto, Y., Sadanaga, Y., Li, J., Matsuoka, K., Takemura, M., Fujii, T., Nakagawa, M., Kohno, N., Nakashima, Y., Sato, K., Nakayama, T., Kato, S., Takami, A., Yoshino, A., Murano, K., and Kajii, Y.: Relative and Absolute Sensitivity Analysis on Ozone Production in Tsukuba, a City in Japan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13629–13635,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03542" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b03542</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Santiago, J. V., Inoue, K., and Tonokura, K.: Diagnosis of ozone formation sensitivity in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column ratios from the ozone monitoring instrument, Environ. Adv., 6, 100138,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100138</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Schroeder, J. R., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A., Walega, J., Weinheimer, A., Wisthaler, A., Müller, M., Mikoviny, T., Chen, G., Shook, M., Blake, D. R., and Tonnesen, G. S.: New insights into the column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio as an indicator of near-surface ozone sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 8885–8907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026781" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026781</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, S., Liu, J., Jin, D., Huo, J., Xue, R., Zhu, J., Gu, C., and Zhou, B.: HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile characteristics under different synoptic patterns in Shanghai, China, J. Environ. Sci., S1001074225000427,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.01.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jes.2025.01.028</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Sillman, S. and He, D.: Some theoretical results concerning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-VOC chemistry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-VOC indicators, J. Geophys. Res., 107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD001123</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Souri, A. H., Chance, K., Bak, J., Nowlan, C. R., González Abad, G., Jung, Y., Wong, D. C., Mao, J., and Liu, X.: Unraveling pathways of elevated ozone induced by the 2020 lockdown in Europe by an observationally constrained regional model using TROPOMI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18227–18245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18227-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-18227-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Souri, A. H., Johnson, M. S., Wolfe, G. M., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A., Wisthaler, A., Brune, W. H., Blake, D. R., Weinheimer, A. J., Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Vigouroux, C., Langerock, B., Choi, S., Lamsal, L., Zhu, L., Sun, S., Cohen, R. C., Min, K.-E., Cho, C., Philip, S., Liu, X., and Chance, K.: Characterization of errors in satellite-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ∕ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric column ratios with respect to chemistry, column-to-PBL translation, spatial representation, and retrieval uncertainties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1963–1986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1963-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-1963-2023</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Souri, A. H., Kumar, R., Chong, H., Golbazi, M., Knowland, K. E., Geddes, J., and Johnson, M. S.: Decoupling in the vertical shape of HCHO during a sea breeze event: The effect on trace gas satellite retrievals and column-to-surface translation, Atmos. Environ., 309, 119929,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119929</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Souri, A. H., González Abad, G., Wolfe, G. M., Verhoelst, T., Vigouroux, C., Pinardi, G., Compernolle, S., Langerock, B., Duncan, B. N., and Johnson, M. S.: Feasibility of robust estimates of ozone production rates using a synergy of satellite observations, ground-based remote sensing, and models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2061–2086, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2061-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-2061-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Souri, A. H., González Abad, G., Duncan, B. N., and Oman, L. D.: Beyond binary maps from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>∕<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: a deep neural network approach to global daily mapping of net ozone production rates and sensitivities constrained by satellite observations (2005–2023), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 809–837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-809-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-26-809-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Spinei, E., Whitehill, A., Fried, A., Tiefengraber, M., Knepp, T. N., Herndon, S., Herman, J. R., Müller, M., Abuhassan, N., Cede, A., Richter, D., Walega, J., Crawford, J., Szykman, J., Valin, L., Williams, D. J., Long, R., Swap, R. J., Lee, Y., Nowak, N., and Poche, B.: The first evaluation of formaldehyde column observations by improved Pandora spectrometers during the KORUS-AQ field study, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4943–4961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4943-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-4943-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Su, W., Liu, C., Hu, Q., Zhao, S., Sun, Y., Wang, W., Zhu, Y., Liu, J., and Kim, J.: Primary and secondary sources of ambient formaldehyde in the Yangtze River Delta based on Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6717–6736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6717-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6717-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>The International GEOS-Chem User Community: geoschem/GCHP: GCHP 14.4.0,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11403806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/ZENODO.11403806</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Thorp, T., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Spracklen, D. V., Conibear, L., Knote, C., Arshinov, M., Belan, B., Asmi, E., Laurila, T., Skorokhod, A. I., Nieminen, T., and Petäjä, T.: Late-spring and summertime tropospheric ozone and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in western Siberia and the Russian Arctic: regional model evaluation and sensitivities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4677–4697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Tirpitz, J.-L., Frieß, U., Hendrick, F., Alberti, C., Allaart, M., Apituley, A., Bais, A., Beirle, S., Berkhout, S., Bognar, K., Bösch, T., Bruchkouski, I., Cede, A., Chan, K. L., den Hoed, M., Donner, S., Drosoglou, T., Fayt, C., Friedrich, M. M., Frumau, A., Gast, L., Gielen, C., Gomez-Martín, L., Hao, N., Hensen, A., Henzing, B., Hermans, C., Jin, J., Kreher, K., Kuhn, J., Lampel, J., Li, A., Liu, C., Liu, H., Ma, J., Merlaud, A., Peters, E., Pinardi, G., Piters, A., Platt, U., Puentedura, O., Richter, A., Schmitt, S., Spinei, E., Stein Zweers, D., Strong, K., Swart, D., Tack, F., Tiefengraber, M., van der Hoff, R., van Roozendael, M., Vlemmix, T., Vonk, J., Wagner, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Wenig, M., Wiegner, M., Wittrock, F., Xie, P., Xing, C., Xu, J., Yela, M., Zhang, C., and Zhao, X.: Intercomparison of MAX-DOAS vertical profile retrieval algorithms: studies on field data from the CINDI-2 campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-1-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Tonnesen, G. S. and Dennis, R. L.: Analysis of radical propagation efficiency to assess ozone sensitivity to hydrocarbons and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: 2. Long-lived species as indicators of ozone concentration sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 9227–9241,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999jd900372</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Travis, K. R. and Jacob, D. J.: Systematic bias in evaluating chemical transport models with maximum daily 8 h average (MDA8) surface ozone for air quality applications: a case study with GEOS-Chem v9.02, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3641–3648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3641-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-3641-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu, L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Thompson, A. M., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Dibb, J. E., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Wolfe, G. M., Pollack, I. B., Peischl, J., Neuman, J. A., and Zhou, X.: Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13561–13577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., Eskes, H. J., Eichmann, K.-U., Fjæraa, A. M., Granville, J., Niemeijer, S., Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Hendrick, F., Pazmiño, A., Bais, A., Bazureau, A., Boersma, K. F., Bognar, K., Dehn, A., Donner, S., Elokhov, A., Gebetsberger, M., Goutail, F., Grutter de la Mora, M., Gruzdev, A., Gratsea, M., Hansen, G. H., Irie, H., Jepsen, N., Kanaya, Y., Karagkiozidis, D., Kivi, R., Kreher, K., Levelt, P. F., Liu, C., Müller, M., Navarro Comas, M., Piters, A. J. M., Pommereau, J.-P., Portafaix, T., Prados-Roman, C., Puentedura, O., Querel, R., Remmers, J., Richter, A., Rimmer, J., Rivera Cárdenas, C., Saavedra de Miguel, L., Sinyakov, V. P., Stremme, W., Strong, K., Van Roozendael, M., Veefkind, J. P., Wagner, T., Wittrock, F., Yela González, M., and Zehner, C.: Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5P TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 481–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-481-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-481-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Welch, A. M., Nagalingam, S., Leong, C., Czimczik, C. I., Tang, J., Seco, R., Rinnan, R., Vettikkat, L., Schobesberger, S., Holst, T., Brijesh, S., Sheesley, R. J., Barsanti, K. C., and Guenther, A. B.: High temperature sensitivity of Arctic isoprene emissions explained by sedges, Nat. Commun., 15, 6144,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49960-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-49960-0</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Shi, C., Ji, X., Zhu, Y., Xia, C., Sun, X., Zhang, M., Lin, X., Yan, S., Zhou, Y., Xing, C., Chen, Y., and Liu, C.: Vertical and spatial differences in ozone formation sensitivities under different ozone pollution levels in eastern Chinese cities, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 30,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00855-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-024-00855-3</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Weng, H., Lin, J., Martin, R., Millet, D. B., Jaeglé, L., Ridley, D., Keller, C., Li, C., Du, M., and Meng, J.: Global high-resolution emissions of soil <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sea salt aerosols, and biogenic volatile organic compounds, Sci. Data, 7, 148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wu, W., Fu, T.-M., Arnold, S. R., Spracklen, D. V., Zhang, A., Tao, W., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Mo, J., Chen, J., Li, Y., Feng, X., Lin, H., Huang, Z., Zheng, J., Shen, H., Zhu, L., Wang, C., Ye, J., and  Yang, X.: Temperature-Dependent Evaporative Anthropogenic VOC Emissions Significantly Exacerbate Regional Ozone Pollution, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 5430–5441,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.3c09122</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Xing, C., Liu, C., Hong, Q., Liu, H., Wu, H., Lin, J., Song, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, T., Hu, Q., Tan, W., and Lin, H.: Vertical distributions and potential sources of wintertime atmospheric pollutants and the corresponding ozone production on the coast of Bohai Sea, J. Environ. Manage., 319, 115721,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115721</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Xu, X., Huang, L., Yao, L., Yoshida, Y., and Long, Y.: Rising socio-economic costs of PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution and medical service mismatching, Nat. Sustain., 8, 265–275,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01509-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41893-025-01509-9</ext-link>, 2025. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Xue, J., Zhao, T., Luo, Y., Miao, C., Su, P., Liu, F., Zhang, G., Qin, S., Song, Y., Bu, N., and Xing, C.: Identification of ozone sensitivity for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and secondary HCHO based on MAX-DOAS measurements in northeast China, Environ. Int., 160, 107048,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2021.107048</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Yang, Q., Jin, X., Wang, H., Fiore, A. M., Tao, M., Kim, J., Cho, Y., Lee, W., Lee, D., Yuan, Q., Zhang, C., Liu, C., Li, K., Lu, X., and Gao, M.: Geostationary Air Quality Monitoring Substantiates Column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a Better <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Formation Regime Indicator in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 131, e2025JD045271,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD045271" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025JD045271</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, S., Wang, S., Zhang, R., Guo, Y., Yan, Y., Ding, Z., and Zhou, B.: Investigating the Sources of Formaldehyde and Corresponding Photochemical Indications at a Suburb Site in Shanghai From MAX-DOAS Measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033351,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033351</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zogka, A. G., Romanias, M. N., and Thevenet, F.: Formaldehyde and glyoxal measurement deploying a selected ion flow tube mass spectrometer (SIFT-MS), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2001–2019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2001-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-2001-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Ozone formation sensitivity based on the secondary formaldehyde-to-nitrogen dioxide ratio (FNR<sub>sec</sub>) derived from ground-based remote sensing measurements and a chemical transport model</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Abdi-Oskouei, M., Roozitalab, B., Stanier, C. O., Christiansen, M., Pfister, G., Pierce, R. B., McDonald, B. C., Adelman, Z., Janseen, M., Dickens, A. F., and Carmichael, G. R.:
The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037042,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037042</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Akimoto, H.:
Overview of policy actions and observational data for PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> in Japan: a study of urban air quality improvement in Asia, JICA-RI Working Paper, 137,  <a href="https://www.jica.go.jp/Resource/jica-ri/publication/workingpaper/l75nbg0000048r3z-att/JICA-RI_WP_No_137.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 April 2025), 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Bates, K. H., Evans, M. J., Henderson, B. H., and Jacob, D. J.:
Impacts of updated reaction kinetics on the global GEOS-Chem simulation of atmospheric chemistry, Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1511–1524, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1511-2024</a>, 2024. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Bindle, L., Martin, R. V., Cooper, M. J., Lundgren, E. W., Eastham, S. D., Auer, B. M., Clune, T. L., Weng, H., Lin, J., Murray, L. T., Meng, J., Keller, C. A., Putman, W. M., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.:
Grid-stretching capability for the GEOS-Chem 13.0.0 atmospheric chemistry model, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5977–5997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5977-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5977-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., and Kreuter, M.:
Manual for Blick Software Suite 1.8, <a href="https://www.pandonia-global-network.org/assets/manuals/BlickSoftwareSuite_Manual_v1-8-4.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 29 November 2024), 2021a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., and Spinei, E.:
Pandonia Global Network Data Products Readme Document, <a href="https://www.pandonia-global-network.org/assets/manuals/PGN_DataProducts_Readme_v1-8-5.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 25 September 2024), 2021b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Chang, L.-S., Ahn, S., Bae, M.-S., Park, S.-M., Gil, J., Kim, K.-R., Lee, G., Lee, T., Woo, J.-H., Park, R., Kwon, H.-A., Choo, G.-H., and Song, C.-K.:
Role of factors controlling diurnal variation of cold-season formaldehyde during Satellite Integrated Joint Monitoring of Air Quality 2021 campaign, Sci. Total Environ., 960, 178283,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178283" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178283</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Chatani, S., Kitayama, K., Itahashi, S., Irie, H., and Shimadera, H.:
Effectiveness of emission controls implemented since 2000 on ambient ozone concentrations in multiple timescales in Japan: An emission inventory development and simulation study, Sci. Total Environ., 894, 165058,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165058</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, Z., Sun, L., Huang, L., Xie, Y., Yang, S., Sun, L., Xue, J., and Yan, F.:
Inequality of exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> and ozone among age groups and cities in Japan in 2030 and 2050, Urban Clim., 55, 101935,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101935" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101935</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Choi, S., Lamsal, L. N., Follette-Cook, M., Joiner, J., Krotkov, N. A., Swartz, W. H., Pickering, K. E., Loughner, C. P., Appel, W., Pfister, G., Saide, P. E., Cohen, R. C., Weinheimer, A. J., and Herman, J. R.:
Assessment of NO<sub>2</sub> observations during DISCOVER-AQ and KORUS-AQ field campaigns, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2523–2546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2523-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2523-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Choo, G.-H., Lee, K., Hong, H., Jeong, U., Choi, W., and Janz, S. J.:
Highly resolved mapping of NO<sub>2</sub> vertical column densities from GeoTASO measurements over a megacity and industrial area during the KORUS-AQ campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 625–644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-625-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-625-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Douros, J., Eskes, H., van Geffen, J., Boersma, K. F., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Blechschmidt, A.-M., Peuch, V.-H., Colette, A., and Veefkind, P.:
Comparing Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> column observations with the CAMS regional air quality ensemble, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 509–534, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-509-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Duncan, B. N., Yoshida, Y., Olson, J. R., Sillman, S., Martin, R. V., Lamsal, L., Hu, Y., Pickering, K. E., Retscher, C., Allen, D. J., and Crawford, J. H.:
Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and VOC controls on surface ozone formation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2213–2223,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Eastham, S. D., Long, M. S., Keller, C. A., Lundgren, E., Yantosca, R. M., Zhuang, J., Li, C., Lee, C. J., Yannetti, M., Auer, B. M., Clune, T. L., Kouatchou, J., Putman, W. M., Thompson, M. A., Trayanov, A. L., Molod, A. M., Martin, R. V., and Jacob, D. J.:
GEOS-Chem High Performance (GCHP v11-02c): a next-generation implementation of the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model for massively parallel applications, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2941–2953, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2941-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2941-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Feng, Z., Agathokleous, E., Yue, X., Oksanen, E., Paoletti, E., Sase, H., Gandin, A., Koike, T., Calatayud, V., Yuan, X., Liu, X., De Marco, A., Jolivet, Y., Kontunen-Soppela, S., Hoshika, Y., Saji, H., Li, P., Li, Z., Watanabe, M., and Kobayashi, K.:
Emerging challenges of ozone impacts on asian plants: actions are needed to protect ecosystem health, Ecosyst. Health Sustain., 7, 1911602,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2021.1911602" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/20964129.2021.1911602</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Grulke, N. E. and Heath, R. L.:
Ozone effects on plants in natural ecosystems, Plant Biol., 22, 12–37,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12971" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12971</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Hammer, M.-U., Vogel, B., and Vogel, H.:
Findings on H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>/HNO<sub>3</sub> as an indicator of ozone sensitivity in Baden-Württemberg, Berlin-Brandenburg, and the Po valley based on numerical simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000211</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Herman, J. and Mao, J.:
Seasonal variation of total column formaldehyde, nitrogen dioxide, and ozone over various Pandora spectrometer sites with a comparison of OMI and diurnally varying DSCOVR-EPIC satellite data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 4165–4182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4165-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-4165-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Herman, J., Cede, A., Spinei, E., Mount, G., Tzortziou, M., and Abuhassan, N.:
NO<sub>2</sub> column amounts from ground-based Pandora and MFDOAS spectrometers using the direct-sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and application to OMI validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 2009JD011848,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011848</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Hong, Q., Zhu, L., Xing, C., Hu, Q., Lin, H., Zhang, C., Zhao, C., Liu, T., Su, W., and Liu, C.:
Inferring vertical variability and diurnal evolution of O3 formation sensitivity based on the vertical distribution of summertime HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> in Guangzhou, China, Sci. Total Environ., 827, 154045,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154045" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154045</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Hu, Q., Ji, X., Hong, Q., Li, J., Li, Q., Ou, J., Liu, H., Xing, C., Tan, W., Chen, J., Chang, B., and Liu, C.:
Vertical Evolution of Ozone Formation Sensitivity Based on Synchronous Vertical Observations of Ozone and Proxies for Its Precursors: Implications for Ozone Pollution Prevention Strategies, Environ. Sci. Technol., acs.est.4c00637,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00637" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c00637</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Inoue, K., Tonokura, K., and Yamada, H.:
Modeling study on the spatial variation of the sensitivity of photochemical ozone concentrations and population exposure to VOC emission reductions in Japan, Air Qual. Atmos. Hlth., 12, 1035–1047,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00720-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00720-w</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Irie, H., Takashima, H., Kanaya, Y., Boersma, K. F., Gast, L., Wittrock, F., Brunner, D., Zhou, Y., and Van Roozendael, M.:
Eight-component retrievals from ground-based MAX-DOAS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1027–1044, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011</a>, 2011. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Irie, H., Yonekawa, D., Damiani, A., Hoque, H. M. S., Sudo, K., and Itahashi, S.:
Continuous multi-component MAX-DOAS observations for the planetary boundary layer ozone variation analysis at Chiba and Tsukuba, Japan, from 2013 to 2019, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 8, 31,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00424-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-021-00424-9</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Itahashi, S. and Irie, H.:
Surface and aloft NO<sub>2</sub> pollution over the greater Tokyo area observed by ground-based and MAX-DOAS measurements bridged by kilometer-scale regional air quality modeling, Prog. Earth Planet. Sci., 9, 15,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-022-00474-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-022-00474-7</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Jin, X., Fiore, A. M., Murray, L. T., Valin, L. C., Lamsal, L. N., Duncan, B., Folkert Boersma, K., De Smedt, I., Abad, G. G., Chance, K., and Tonnesen, G. S.:
Evaluating a Space-Based Indicator of Surface Ozone-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-VOC Sensitivity Over Midlatitude Source Regions and Application to Decadal Trends, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026720" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026720</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Jin, X., Yang, Y., Gonzalez Abad, G., Nowlan, C., and Liu, X.:
Observing the Diurnal Variations of Ozone-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-VOC Chemistry Over the U. S. From the Geostationary TEMPO Instrument, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2025GL116394,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL116394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025GL116394</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Judd, L. M., Al-Saadi, J. A., Janz, S. J., Kowalewski, M. G., Pierce, R. B., Szykman, J. J., Valin, L. C., Swap, R., Cede, A., Mueller, M., Tiefengraber, M., Abuhassan, N., and Williams, D.:
Evaluating the impact of spatial resolution on tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column comparisons within urban areas using high-resolution airborne data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 6091–6111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-6091-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Judd, L. M., Al-Saadi, J. A., Szykman, J. J., Valin, L. C., Janz, S. J., Kowalewski, M. G., Eskes, H. J., Veefkind, J. P., Cede, A., Mueller, M., Gebetsberger, M., Swap, R., Pierce, R. B., Nowlan, C. R., Abad, G. G., Nehrir, A., and Williams, D.:
Evaluating Sentinel-5P TROPOMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column densities with airborne and Pandora spectrometers near New York City and Long Island Sound, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6113–6140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6113-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6113-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Jung, J., Choi, Y., Mousavinezhad, S., Kang, D., Park, J., Pouyaei, A., Ghahremanloo, M., Momeni, M., and Kim, H.:
Changes in the ozone chemical regime over the contiguous United States inferred by the inversion of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and VOC emissions using satellite observation, Atmos. Res., 270, 106076,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106076</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Kim, S., Kim, D., Hong, H., Chang, L.-S., Lee, H., Kim, D.-R., Kim, D., Yu, J.-A., Lee, D., Jeong, U., Song, C.-K., Kim, S.-W., Park, S. S., Kim, J., Hanisco, T. F., Park, J., Choi, W., and Lee, K.:
First-time comparison between NO<sub>2</sub> vertical columns from Geostationary Environmental Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS) and Pandora measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3959–3972, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3959-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3959-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Kleinman, L. I., Daum, P. H., Lee, Y., Nunnermacker, L. J., Springston, S. R., Weinstein-Lloyd, J., and Rudolph, J.:
Sensitivity of ozone production rate to ozone precursors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 2903–2906,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012597" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012597</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Kurokawa, J. and Ohara, T.:
Long-term historical trends in air pollutant emissions in Asia: Regional Emission inventory in ASia (REAS) version 3, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12761–12793, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12761-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Langford, V. S., Dryahina, K., and Španìl, P.:
Robust Automated SIFT-MS Quantitation of Volatile Compounds in Air Using a Multicomponent Gas Standard, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 34, 2630–2645, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.3c00312" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.3c00312</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Lin, H., Jacob, D. J., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., Keller, C. A., Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Emmons, L. K., Campbell, P. C., Baker, B., Saylor, R. D., and Montuoro, R.:
Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Lin, H., Xing, C., Hong, Q., Liu, C., Ji, X., Liu, T., Lin, J., Lu, C., Tan, W., Li, Q., and Liu, H.:
Diagnosis of Ozone Formation Sensitivities in Different Height Layers via MAX-DOAS Observations in Guangzhou, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036803,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036803</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, H., Liu, S., Xue, B., Lv, Z., Meng, Z., Yang, X., Xue, T., Yu, Q., and He, K.:
Ground-level ozone pollution and its health impacts in China, Atmos. Environ., 173, 223–230,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.014</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, O., Li, Z., Lin, Y., Fan, C., Zhang, Y., Li, K., Zhang, P., Wei, Y., Chen, T., Dong, J., and de Leeuw, G.:
Evaluation of the first year of Pandora NO<sub>2</sub> measurements over Beijing and application to satellite validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 377–395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-377-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-377-2024</a>, 2024. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Mahmood, F., Khokhar, M. F., and Mahmood, Z.:
Examining the relationship of tropospheric ozone and climate change on crop productivity using the multivariate panel data techniques, J. Environ. Manage., 272, 111024,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111024</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Martin, R. V., Eastham, S. D., Bindle, L., Lundgren, E. W., Clune, T. L., Keller, C. A., Downs, W., Zhang, D., Lucchesi, R. A., Sulprizio, M. P., Yantosca, R. M., Li, Y., Estrada, L., Putman, W. M., Auer, B. M., Trayanov, A. L., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.:
Improved advection, resolution, performance, and community access in the new generation (version 13) of the high-performance GEOS-Chem global atmospheric chemistry model (GCHP), Geosci. Model Dev., 15, 8731–8748, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8731-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-8731-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       McDuffie, E., Smith, S., O'Rourke, P., Tibrewal, K., Venkataraman, C., Marais, E., Zheng, B., Crippa, M., Brauer, M., and Martin, R.:
CEDS_GBD-MAPS: Global Anthropogenic Emission Inventory of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, SO<sub>2</sub>, CO, NH<sub>3</sub>, NMVOCs, BC, and OC from 1970–2017 (2020_v1.0), <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3754964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3754964</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       McLinden, C. A., Olsen, S. C., Hannegan, B., Wild, O., Prather, M. J., and Sundet, J.:
Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models: A simple chemistry and the cross-tropopause flux, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 14653–14665,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900124</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Mishra, M., Chen, P.-H., Lin, G.-Y., Nguyen, T.-T.-N., Le, T.-C., Dejchanchaiwong, R., Tekasakul, P., Shih, S.-H., Jhang, C.-W., and Tsai, C.-J.:
Photochemical oxidation of VOCs and their source impact assessment on ozone under de-weather conditions in Western Taiwan, Environ. Pollut., 346, 123662,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123662" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123662</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Mouat, A. P., Spinei, E., and Kaiser, J.:
Informing Near-Airport Satellite NO<sub>2</sub> Retrievals Using Pandora Sky-Scanning Observations, ACS EST Air, 1, 1617–1628,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00158" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00158</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Nuvolone, D., Petri, D., and Voller, F.:
The effects of ozone on human health, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 8074–8088,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Prather, M. J.:
Photolysis rates in correlated overlapping cloud fields: Cloud-J 7.3c, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 2587–2595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-2587-2015</a>, 2015. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Qian, Y., Wang, D., Li, Z., Liu, H., Zhou, H., Dou, K., Xi, L., Tang, F., Si, F., and Luo, Y.:
Ground-based MAX-DOAS observations of tropospheric formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide: Insights into ozone formation sensitivity, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 15, 102285,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2024.102285</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Ramya, A., Dhevagi, P., Poornima, R., Avudainayagam, S., Watanabe, M., and Agathokleous, E.:
Effect of ozone stress on crop productivity: A threat to food security, Environ. Res., 236, 116816,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116816</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Rawat, P., Crawford, J. H., Travis, K. R., Judd, L. M., Demetillo, M. A. G., Valin, L. C., Szykman, J. J., Whitehill, A., Baumann, E., and Hanisco, T. F.:
Maximizing the scientific application of Pandora column observations of HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub>, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 2899–2917, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2899-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-2899-2025</a>, 2025. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Roberts, I. J., Carpenter, L. J., Shaw, M. D., and Langford, V. S.:
Selected Ion Flow Tube – Mass Spectrometry (SIFT-MS) study of the reactions of H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup>, NO<sup>+</sup> and O<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> with a range of oxygenated volatile organic carbons (OVOCs), Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 479, 116892,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2022.116892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2022.116892</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Ryan, R. G., Marais, E. A., Gershenson-Smith, E., Ramsay, R., Muller, J.-P., Tirpitz, J.-L., and Frieß, U.:
Measurement report: MAX-DOAS measurements characterise Central London ozone pollution episodes during 2022 heatwaves, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7121–7139, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7121-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7121-2023</a>, 2023. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Sadanaga, Y., Kawasaki, S., Tanaka, Y., Kajii, Y., and Bandow, H.:
New System for Measuring the Photochemical Ozone Production Rate in the Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2871–2878,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04639" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b04639</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Sakamoto, Y., Sadanaga, Y., Li, J., Matsuoka, K., Takemura, M., Fujii, T., Nakagawa, M., Kohno, N., Nakashima, Y., Sato, K., Nakayama, T., Kato, S., Takami, A., Yoshino, A., Murano, K., and Kajii, Y.:
Relative and Absolute Sensitivity Analysis on Ozone Production in Tsukuba, a City in Japan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13629–13635,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03542" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03542</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Santiago, J. V., Inoue, K., and Tonokura, K.:
Diagnosis of ozone formation sensitivity in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area using HCHO∕NO<sub>2</sub> column ratios from the ozone monitoring instrument, Environ. Adv., 6, 100138,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100138</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Schroeder, J. R., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A., Walega, J., Weinheimer, A., Wisthaler, A., Müller, M., Mikoviny, T., Chen, G., Shook, M., Blake, D. R., and Tonnesen, G. S.:
New insights into the column CH<sub>2</sub>O∕NO<sub>2</sub> ratio as an indicator of near-surface ozone sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 8885–8907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026781" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026781</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Shi, Y., Wang, S., Zhang, S., Liu, J., Jin, D., Huo, J., Xue, R., Zhu, J., Gu, C., and Zhou, B.:
HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> profile characteristics under different synoptic patterns in Shanghai, China, J. Environ. Sci., S1001074225000427,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.01.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.01.028</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Sillman, S. and He, D.:
Some theoretical results concerning O<sub>3</sub>-NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-VOC chemistry and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-VOC indicators, J. Geophys. Res., 107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001123</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Souri, A. H., Chance, K., Bak, J., Nowlan, C. R., González Abad, G., Jung, Y., Wong, D. C., Mao, J., and Liu, X.:
Unraveling pathways of elevated ozone induced by the 2020 lockdown in Europe by an observationally constrained regional model using TROPOMI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18227–18245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18227-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18227-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Souri, A. H., Johnson, M. S., Wolfe, G. M., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A., Wisthaler, A., Brune, W. H., Blake, D. R., Weinheimer, A. J., Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Vigouroux, C., Langerock, B., Choi, S., Lamsal, L., Zhu, L., Sun, S., Cohen, R. C., Min, K.-E., Cho, C., Philip, S., Liu, X., and Chance, K.:
Characterization of errors in satellite-based HCHO&thinsp;∕&thinsp;NO<sub>2</sub> tropospheric column ratios with respect to chemistry, column-to-PBL translation, spatial representation, and retrieval uncertainties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 1963–1986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1963-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-1963-2023</a>, 2023a. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Souri, A. H., Kumar, R., Chong, H., Golbazi, M., Knowland, K. E., Geddes, J., and Johnson, M. S.:
Decoupling in the vertical shape of HCHO during a sea breeze event: The effect on trace gas satellite retrievals and column-to-surface translation, Atmos. Environ., 309, 119929,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119929" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2023.119929</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Souri, A. H., González Abad, G., Wolfe, G. M., Verhoelst, T., Vigouroux, C., Pinardi, G., Compernolle, S., Langerock, B., Duncan, B. N., and Johnson, M. S.:
Feasibility of robust estimates of ozone production rates using a synergy of satellite observations, ground-based remote sensing, and models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 2061–2086, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2061-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2061-2025</a>, 2025. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Souri, A. H., González Abad, G., Duncan, B. N., and Oman, L. D.:
Beyond binary maps from HCHO∕NO<sub>2</sub>: a deep neural network approach to global daily mapping of net ozone production rates and sensitivities constrained by satellite observations (2005–2023), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26, 809–837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-809-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-809-2026</a>, 2026. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Spinei, E., Whitehill, A., Fried, A., Tiefengraber, M., Knepp, T. N., Herndon, S., Herman, J. R., Müller, M., Abuhassan, N., Cede, A., Richter, D., Walega, J., Crawford, J., Szykman, J., Valin, L., Williams, D. J., Long, R., Swap, R. J., Lee, Y., Nowak, N., and Poche, B.:
The first evaluation of formaldehyde column observations by improved Pandora spectrometers during the KORUS-AQ field study, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 4943–4961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4943-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4943-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.:
NOAA's HYSPLIT Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Modeling System, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Su, W., Liu, C., Hu, Q., Zhao, S., Sun, Y., Wang, W., Zhu, Y., Liu, J., and Kim, J.:
Primary and secondary sources of ambient formaldehyde in the Yangtze River Delta based on Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6717–6736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6717-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6717-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       The International GEOS-Chem User Community:
geoschem/GCHP: GCHP 14.4.0,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11403806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11403806</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Thorp, T., Arnold, S. R., Pope, R. J., Spracklen, D. V., Conibear, L., Knote, C., Arshinov, M., Belan, B., Asmi, E., Laurila, T., Skorokhod, A. I., Nieminen, T., and Petäjä, T.:
Late-spring and summertime tropospheric ozone and NO<sub>2</sub> in western Siberia and the Russian Arctic: regional model evaluation and sensitivities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4677–4697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4677-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Tirpitz, J.-L., Frieß, U., Hendrick, F., Alberti, C., Allaart, M., Apituley, A., Bais, A., Beirle, S., Berkhout, S., Bognar, K., Bösch, T., Bruchkouski, I., Cede, A., Chan, K. L., den Hoed, M., Donner, S., Drosoglou, T., Fayt, C., Friedrich, M. M., Frumau, A., Gast, L., Gielen, C., Gomez-Martín, L., Hao, N., Hensen, A., Henzing, B., Hermans, C., Jin, J., Kreher, K., Kuhn, J., Lampel, J., Li, A., Liu, C., Liu, H., Ma, J., Merlaud, A., Peters, E., Pinardi, G., Piters, A., Platt, U., Puentedura, O., Richter, A., Schmitt, S., Spinei, E., Stein Zweers, D., Strong, K., Swart, D., Tack, F., Tiefengraber, M., van der Hoff, R., van Roozendael, M., Vlemmix, T., Vonk, J., Wagner, T., Wang, Y., Wang, Z., Wenig, M., Wiegner, M., Wittrock, F., Xie, P., Xing, C., Xu, J., Yela, M., Zhang, C., and Zhao, X.:
Intercomparison of MAX-DOAS vertical profile retrieval algorithms: studies on field data from the CINDI-2 campaign, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Tonnesen, G. S. and Dennis, R. L.:
Analysis of radical propagation efficiency to assess ozone sensitivity to hydrocarbons and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>: 2. Long-lived species as indicators of ozone concentration sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 9227–9241,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900372</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Travis, K. R. and Jacob, D. J.:
Systematic bias in evaluating chemical transport models with maximum daily 8&thinsp;h average (MDA8) surface ozone for air quality applications: a case study with GEOS-Chem v9.02, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 3641–3648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3641-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-3641-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
       Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu, L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Thompson, A. M., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Dibb, J. E., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Wolfe, G. M., Pollack, I. B., Peischl, J., Neuman, J. A., and Zhou, X.:
Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13561–13577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
       van der Werf, G. R., Randerson, J. T., Giglio, L., van Leeuwen, T. T., Chen, Y., Rogers, B. M., Mu, M., van Marle, M. J. E., Morton, D. C., Collatz, G. J., Yokelson, R. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.:
Global fire emissions estimates during 1997–2016, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 9, 697–720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-697-2017</a>, 2017. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
       Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., Eskes, H. J., Eichmann, K.-U., Fjæraa, A. M., Granville, J., Niemeijer, S., Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Hendrick, F., Pazmiño, A., Bais, A., Bazureau, A., Boersma, K. F., Bognar, K., Dehn, A., Donner, S., Elokhov, A., Gebetsberger, M., Goutail, F., Grutter de la Mora, M., Gruzdev, A., Gratsea, M., Hansen, G. H., Irie, H., Jepsen, N., Kanaya, Y., Karagkiozidis, D., Kivi, R., Kreher, K., Levelt, P. F., Liu, C., Müller, M., Navarro Comas, M., Piters, A. J. M., Pommereau, J.-P., Portafaix, T., Prados-Roman, C., Puentedura, O., Querel, R., Remmers, J., Richter, A., Rimmer, J., Rivera Cárdenas, C., Saavedra de Miguel, L., Sinyakov, V. P., Stremme, W., Strong, K., Van Roozendael, M., Veefkind, J. P., Wagner, T., Wittrock, F., Yela González, M., and Zehner, C.:
Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 481–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-481-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-481-2021</a>, 2021. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, H., Welch, A. M., Nagalingam, S., Leong, C., Czimczik, C. I., Tang, J., Seco, R., Rinnan, R., Vettikkat, L., Schobesberger, S., Holst, T., Brijesh, S., Sheesley, R. J., Barsanti, K. C., and Guenther, A. B.:
High temperature sensitivity of Arctic isoprene emissions explained by sedges, Nat. Commun., 15, 6144,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49960-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49960-0</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, Z., Zhang, H., Shi, C., Ji, X., Zhu, Y., Xia, C., Sun, X., Zhang, M., Lin, X., Yan, S., Zhou, Y., Xing, C., Chen, Y., and Liu, C.:
Vertical and spatial differences in ozone formation sensitivities under different ozone pollution levels in eastern Chinese cities, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 30,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00855-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-024-00855-3</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
       Weng, H., Lin, J., Martin, R., Millet, D. B., Jaeglé, L., Ridley, D., Keller, C., Li, C., Du, M., and Meng, J.:
Global high-resolution emissions of soil NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, sea salt aerosols, and biogenic volatile organic compounds, Sci. Data, 7, 148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0488-5</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
       Wu, W., Fu, T.-M., Arnold, S. R., Spracklen, D. V., Zhang, A., Tao, W., Wang, X., Hou, Y., Mo, J., Chen, J., Li, Y., Feng, X., Lin, H., Huang, Z., Zheng, J., Shen, H., Zhu, L., Wang, C., Ye, J., and  Yang, X.:
Temperature-Dependent Evaporative Anthropogenic VOC Emissions Significantly Exacerbate Regional Ozone Pollution, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 5430–5441,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c09122</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
       Xing, C., Liu, C., Hong, Q., Liu, H., Wu, H., Lin, J., Song, Y., Chen, Y., Liu, T., Hu, Q., Tan, W., and Lin, H.:
Vertical distributions and potential sources of wintertime atmospheric pollutants and the corresponding ozone production on the coast of Bohai Sea, J. Environ. Manage., 319, 115721,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115721</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
       Xu, X., Huang, L., Yao, L., Yoshida, Y., and Long, Y.:
Rising socio-economic costs of PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution and medical service mismatching, Nat. Sustain., 8, 265–275,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01509-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01509-9</a>, 2025.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
       Xue, J., Zhao, T., Luo, Y., Miao, C., Su, P., Liu, F., Zhang, G., Qin, S., Song, Y., Bu, N., and Xing, C.:
Identification of ozone sensitivity for NO<sub>2</sub> and secondary HCHO based on MAX-DOAS measurements in northeast China, Environ. Int., 160, 107048,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.107048</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, Q., Jin, X., Wang, H., Fiore, A. M., Tao, M., Kim, J., Cho, Y., Lee, W., Lee, D., Yuan, Q., Zhang, C., Liu, C., Li, K., Lu, X., and Gao, M.:
Geostationary Air Quality Monitoring Substantiates Column NO<sub>2</sub> as a Better O<sub>3</sub> Formation Regime Indicator in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 131, e2025JD045271,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD045271" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD045271</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, S., Wang, S., Zhang, R., Guo, Y., Yan, Y., Ding, Z., and Zhou, B.:
Investigating the Sources of Formaldehyde and Corresponding Photochemical Indications at a Suburb Site in Shanghai From MAX-DOAS Measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033351,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033351</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
       Zogka, A. G., Romanias, M. N., and Thevenet, F.:
Formaldehyde and glyoxal measurement deploying a selected ion flow tube mass spectrometer (SIFT-MS), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 2001–2019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2001-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-2001-2022</a>, 2022. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
