<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-8185-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Causal inference for quantifying chemical–dynamical pathways controlling tropical middle stratospheric ozone variability</article-title><alt-title>Quantifying pathways controlling tropical middle stratospheric ozone variability</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Galytska</surname><given-names>Evgenia</given-names></name>
          <email>egalytska@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6575-1559</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hassler</surname><given-names>Birgit</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2724-709X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Arosio</surname><given-names>Carlo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8759-6390</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Chipperfield</surname><given-names>Martyn P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6803-4149</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Dhomse</surname><given-names>Sandip S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3854-5383</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Dubé</surname><given-names>Kimberlee</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6103-5918</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff6">
          <name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Wuhu</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9907-9120</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Iglesias-Suarez</surname><given-names>Fernando</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3403-8245</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff7">
          <name><surname>Runge</surname><given-names>Jakob</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institute of Space and Atmospheric Studies, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9PH, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Department of Computer Science, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Evgenia Galytska (egalytska@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>8185</fpage><lpage>8209</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Evgenia Galytska et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e196">Understanding the chemical–dynamical interactions controlling ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) variability in the tropical middle stratosphere is essential for interpreting short-term trends and their sensitivity to dynamical fluctuations. This study applies a process-oriented causal inference framework that combines causal discovery and causal effect estimation. This approach integrates qualitative physical knowledge through a causal graph applied to satellite observations and a chemistry-transport model (CTM) simulation, using monthly data for the period 2004–2021. Causal inference robustly identifies a dominant chemical–dynamical pathway, in which variability in residual vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) modulates nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), subsequently affecting nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>) and ultimately O<sub>3</sub>. Estimates of direct causal effect capture that O<sub>3</sub> variability is dominated by this indirect NO<sub>2</sub>-mediated pathway, while the direct influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> is weak. The total causal effect (direct and mediated) peaks at a lag of approximately two-three months, indicating the cumulative impact of persistent, vertically coupled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies associated with the QBO. Regime-oriented analysis applied to the observations reveals that the chemical links (N<sub>2</sub>O–NO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>3</sub>) strengthen during westerly QBO shear compared to easterly shear.</p>

      <p id="d2e333">Our study highlights the pivotal role that causal inference can play in disentangling complex chemical-dynamical influences on O<sub>3</sub>, complementing traditional statistical methods. This approach lays the foundation for broader applications in stratospheric chemistry, where the understanding of various feedback pathways remains uncertain. By discovering and quantifying causal links, this methodology can be adapted to address open questions with environmental and societal relevance. Integrating causal reasoning into data-driven science can enhance process understanding and also strengthen the synergy between machine learning and statistical methods in Earth and environmental sciences.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Universität Bremen</funding-source>
<award-id>ZF04A/2023/FB1/Galytska Evgenia</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>European Research Council</funding-source>
<award-id>855187</award-id>
<award-id>948112</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Horizon 2020</funding-source>
<award-id>101003536</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Helmholtz Association</funding-source>
<award-id>Advanced Earth System Model Evaluation for CMIP (EVal4CMIP)</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>National Centre for Earth Observation</funding-source>
<award-id>NE/V011863/1</award-id>
<award-id>4000137112/22/I-AG</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e354">Stratospheric ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) is essential for protecting life on Earth by absorbing most of the harmful solar ultraviolet (UV-B) radiation (280–315 nm). The tropical (10° S–10° N) middle stratosphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa) is a key region for the photochemical formation of O<sub>3</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.1"/>. A balance between photochemical production and loss, together with dynamical transport, determines the overall abundance of stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.2"/>. Its global distribution and inter-annual changes are mainly determined by dynamical and chemical processes in conjunction with their superimposed variability of different origins and periodicity, such as Brewer–Dobson circulation (BDC), El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO), concentrations of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and Ozone Depleting Substances (ODSs). Reduction in stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> concentrations allows more UV radiation to reach the Earth's surface, resulting in harmful effects, including damage to plant life and crops, disruption of aquatic ecosystems, and increased risks of skin cancer, cataracts, immune suppression, and erythema in humans <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78 bib1.bibx80" id="paren.3"/>. To mitigate these harmful effects, actions taken under the Montreal Protocol and its Amendments and Adjustments have significantly reduced emissions and atmospheric abundances of ODSs, contributing to the recovery of the stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> layer.</p>
      <p id="d2e422">Apparent changes in tropical middle stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> can vary substantially depending on the length and timing of the analyzed period. For example, in the early 2000s, several studies reported statistically significant O<sub>3</sub> decline in this region using a variety of datasets and methodologies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.4"/>. Subsequent analyses showed that the slight differences in the tropical O<sub>3</sub> trends across different data sources arise from small shifts in the analyzed time period, largely due to endpoint anomalies influenced by the curvature of long-term O<sub>3</sub> variability and unaccounted fluctuations in the record <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.5"/>. Recent assessments show that the magnitude of O<sub>3</sub> trends in the tropical middle stratosphere since the early 2000s is highly uncertain <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to 0 % per decade,</named-content></xref> with multiple studies finding no statistically significant or robust long-term trend across different datasets and time periods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.7"/>. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.8"/> highlighted a strong seasonal dependence in tropical middle stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> trends during 2000–2018, with a significant increase in spring (2 %–3 % per decade) and a non-significant decrease in autumn (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % per decade), resulting in non-significant trends, consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx44" id="text.9"/>. However, the absence of a persistent long-term trend in recent analyses does not rule out future changes of O<sub>3</sub> in the tropical middle stratosphere. Similarly, negative trends observed in the early 2000s could recur if comparable dynamical–chemical conditions arise. In this context, understanding the mechanisms governing interannual O<sub>3</sub> variability becomes particularly important, as such variability can substantially influence trends derived from a limited observational dataset.</p>
      <p id="d2e548">While previously discussed O<sub>3</sub> trends motivate this study, our objective is to quantify the mechanisms that control O<sub>3</sub> variability on monthly timescales and thus, that can modulate trends over limited time periods. The sensitivity of O<sub>3</sub> trends in the tropical middle stratosphere to the analyzed period highlights the dominant role of chemical–dynamical variability in this region. In this context, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.10"/> showed that the O<sub>3</sub> decline observed in the early 2000s was dynamically controlled and linked to increases in nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>). The elevated NO<sub>2</sub> levels enhanced O<sub>3</sub> loss through the catalytic NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) cycle, dominant in the middle stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.11"/>. The increase in NO<sub>2</sub>, also confirmed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.12"/>, resulted from the prolonged residence time of its primary source, nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). Since N<sub>2</sub>O is a long-lived species <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.13"/>, the changes in its abundance reflect variations in tropical upwelling within the BDC, therefore, they are directly affected by changes in stratospheric transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.14"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.15"/> showed that during 2005–2021, N<sub>2</sub>O increased in the tropical middle stratosphere more than expected from the rate of tropospheric increases. This implies a more vigorous BDC, leading to a shorter lifetime. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.16"/> evaluated the climatological impact of the stratospheric BDC on N<sub>2</sub>O and reported that, in the tropical middle stratosphere, the interannual variability of vertical residual advection exhibits a significant spread, which reflects the influence of the major source of interannual variability in the equatorial stratosphere, i.e. the QBO on tropical upwelling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.17"/>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.18"/>, and later <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="text.19"/> highlighted that the source gas N<sub>2</sub>O and the reactive nitrogen species (NO<sub><italic>y</italic></sub>) display coherent QBO signals within the tropical stratosphere. O<sub>3</sub> also exhibits a strong QBO signal, with the QBO directly influencing O<sub>3</sub> levels by altering the chemical reactions responsible for O<sub>3</sub> depletion, see also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.20"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.21"/>. This oscillation modulates the rates of these reactions, leading to additional variations in O<sub>3</sub> concentration. It is also important to note that recent work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.22"/> demonstrates that ozone can play a leading role in modulating the QBO, highlighting a two-way chemical–dynamical interaction, which is the subject of ongoing research and clarification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e792">Therefore, to set the stage for our subsequent causal analysis of these chemical-dynamical feedback pathways on O<sub>3</sub> variability in the tropical middle stratosphere, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> presents scatter plots of detrended monthly mean anomalies of (a) residual vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) versus N<sub>2</sub>O, (b) N<sub>2</sub>O versus NO<sub>2</sub>, (c) NO<sub>2</sub> versus O<sub>3</sub>, and (d) N<sub>2</sub>O versus O<sub>3</sub> for observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation for 2004–2021. Both observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation exhibit similar correlations and slopes. The relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and N<sub>2</sub>O is moderately positive (panel a). The strong anti-correlations between N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> (panel b) result from their opposing response to transport-driven variability, where, e.g. enhanced upwelling increases N<sub>2</sub>O while reducing its chemical loss, which is crucial for NO<sub>2</sub> production (see further discussion in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>). The negative relationship between NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> (panel c) is a result of NO<sub>2</sub> being the primary sink of O<sub>3</sub> in the middle stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx54" id="paren.24"/>. The positive relationship between N<sub>2</sub>O and O<sub>3</sub> (panel d) reflects transport-controlled variability in N<sub>2</sub>O, while O<sub>3</sub> is mainly controlled by photochemistry <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.25"/>; the observed correlation results from both tracers varying systematically with altitude in the tropical middle stratosphere.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1023">Scatter plots of detrended monthly mean anomalies in the tropical middle stratosphere for 2004–2021, from observations (circles) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (triangles). Panels show <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus N<sub>2</sub>O, <bold>(b)</bold> N<sub>2</sub>O versus NO<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(c)</bold> NO<sub>2</sub> versus O<sub>3</sub>, and <bold>(d)</bold> N<sub>2</sub>O versus O<sub>3</sub>. Solid lines indicate linear regressions for observations (orange) and TOMCAT (pink). The corresponding Pearson correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are shown in each panel.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1127">While the key chemical reactions and dynamical processes governing tropical middle-stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> have been identified and can be simulated in chemistry-climate models (CCMs), previous research relies mostly on correlation and different types of regression analyses that do not explicitly distinguish between direct and mediated causal effects within a multivariate system. A causal inference framework proposed in this study represents the relationships between the selected variables as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), in which nodes correspond to physical quantities and edges represent causal influences. Therefore, the structure of the DAG is informed by established physical understanding and subsequently evaluated using causal inference methods applied to the data. Causal inference can then be used to estimate the targeted relationships under explicit assumptions. Applying such an approach to a well-understood chemical–dynamical system provides a reliable test of whether causal inference can recover known physical pathways and quantify their contributions in the analyzed system. To connect the discussion of stratospheric chemical–dynamical interactions with the causal inference framework used in this study, Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/> provides a glossary that links key causal terms to their interpretation in a stratospheric context. For a broader overview of the terminology, the reader is referred to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.26"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.27"/>. It is important to highlight that to ensure statistical consistency, this study analyzes detrended anomalies rather than long-term trends. Therefore, the results describe variability-driven processes and should not be interpreted as a direct explanation of decadal O<sub>3</sub> trends caused by externally forced long-term changes in CO<sub>2</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, or ODSs, but rather in the context of dynamical processes that are strongly influenced by the QBO.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data sources</title>
      <p id="d2e1183">This study uses monthly data from satellite observations, reanalysis products, and a TOMCAT CTM simulation, focusing on four core variables, namely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub>. We also use a measure of the QBO as an additional variable to examine how the relationships among the four core variables vary under different dynamical regimes. By selecting these variables, we focus the analysis on the interpretability of key chemical-dynamical processes that play a major role in controlling O<sub>3</sub> in the tropical middle stratosphere. We intentionally limit the number of variables to maintain a high level of interpretability of the causal graphs. We then compare the causal graphs from observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Observations</title>
      <p id="d2e1240">Since no single satellite instrument provides all the required variables with sufficient temporal and spatial resolution, we integrate data from multiple sources into this study. The following observational or reanalysis-based datasets were used: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1245"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: Derived Transformed Eulerian Mean (TEM) momentum terms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">v0.1.1,</named-content></xref>, based on European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ERA5 reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.29"/> using diagnostics from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx68" id="text.30"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1270">N<sub>2</sub>O: Profiles from the Earth Observing System (EOS) Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS, v5.01) instrument on NASA's Aura satellite, which offer a vertical resolution of 5–8 km and a horizontal along-track resolution of 165–265 km <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.31"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1286">NO<sub>2</sub>: Profiles retrieved from limb-scattered sunlight observations on the OSIRIS instrument aboard the Swedish Odin satellite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.32"/>. OSIRIS NO<sub>2</sub> v7.3 is retrieved via spectral fitting in the 435–477 nm range from 10.5 to 39.5 km with a 2–3 km vertical resolution in most of the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.33"/>. Due to the pronounced diurnal cycle of NO<sub>2</sub> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.34"/> the photochemical correction from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="text.35"/> was applied to standardize all measurements to a reference time of 12:00 p.m. local solar time;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1330">O<sub>3</sub>: OSIRIS O<sub>3</sub> v7.3 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.36"/>, an improved version of the v5.10 product with corrected long-term drift by accounting for systematic errors in the instrument limb-pointing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.37"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1358">QBO: equatorial zonal mean zonal wind taken from the Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.38"/>.</p></list-item></list> In the following, the combination of these datasets is collectively referred to as “observations”.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>TOMCAT Chemical Transport Model</title>
      <p id="d2e1373">TOMCAT is a three-dimensional off-line CTM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.39"/>, driven here by winds and temperatures from the ERA5 reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.40"/>. Given prescribed atmospheric transport and temperature fields, TOMCAT calculates the distributions of chemical species in the troposphere and stratosphere. A stratospheric full-chemistry simulation, including all of the NO<sub><italic>y</italic></sub> chemistry discussed in this paper, was run at a horizontal resolution of 2.8° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.8° with approximately 1.5 km vertical resolution in the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.41"/>. The model uses time varying sulfate aerosol surface area density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.42"/>, solar fluxes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.43"/>, and lower boundary concentrations of GHGs and ODSs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.44"/>, recommended for CMIP6 simulations. We used the monthly average output in our analysis. The TOMCAT CTM simulation was chosen for its ability to provide a continuous time series without spatial or temporal gaps, making it ideal for robust comparison with the observational datasets.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data preprocessing</title>
      <p id="d2e1419">Monthly anomalies of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> in the tropical (10° S–10° N) middle (10 hPa) stratosphere were calculated from observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation relative to the climatological mean over August 2004–December 2021. The analysis begins in August 2004, due to the availability of MLS N<sub>2</sub>O observations. However, for simplicity, we refer to the period as 2004–2021. To maintain a robust comparison against temporal sampling discrepancies, TOMCAT CTM data were masked to align with observations, omitting any dates with missing observational data. For causal inference, all time series were standardized. Since the application of causality requires the stationarity of the time series (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>), we remove the linear trends from all analyzed time series. For more details about preprocessed timeseries from observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation and their further comparison, see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Causal inference</title>
      <p id="d2e1490">We apply the latent Peter-Clark momentary conditional independence (LPCMCI) algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.45"/>, which is an extension of the PCMCI+ algorithm specifically designed to deal with latent (i.e. unobserved) variables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.46"/>. LPCMCI employs ideas from the Fast Causal Inference (FCI) algorithm to learn not only directed causal relationships but also infer the presence of latent confounders  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.47"/>. LPCMCI benefits from the same ideas underlying PCMCI+ by increasing the effect size of conditional independence (CI) tests through including causal parents in conditioning sets. The LPCMCI method seeks to learn a Directed Partially Ancestral Graph (DPAG), which captures the causal relationships among the observed variables. In contrast to Maximal Ancestral Graphs (MAGs) that contain directed arrows (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bidirected edges (in other words, double-headed arrows <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>↔</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>), PAGs can include additional edge types. These edges, drawn as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="-0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="-0.125em"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and/or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicate the presence of hidden variables or uncertainty about the exact causal direction.</p>
      <p id="d2e1541">To understand the causal structure of the underlying complex dynamical system, the observed time series <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the different variables represented by time series, is assumed to follow the following causal process:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a measurable function that depends on all its inputs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents dynamical noise (independent across <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>≠</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⊂</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∖</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the set of parent variables of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined from the variables in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the dynamical noise <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Bidirected links between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this model imply that the associated noise terms <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are dependent through unobserved confounding. We assume causal stationarity, meaning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if and only if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="script">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In practice, causal discovery algorithms, including LPCMCI, require approximately stationary time series, meaning time series whose statistical properties, such as mean and variance, remain approximately constant over time. Nonstationary behavior, such as long-term trends, can introduce spurious statistical dependencies and bias CI tests, leading to incorrect causal links. Therefore, removing or accounting for such trends (via masking or sliding window) is a methodological necessity to ensure that the algorithm identifies causal relationships associated with the internal dynamics of the system rather than coincidental alignment of long-term shifts in the variables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1942">Additionally, we also assume the absence of cyclic causal relationships, which, due to the temporal order, limits interactions to contemporaneous cases only when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, we assume the standard assumptions of constraint-based causal discovery, the Markov condition and the faithfulness condition <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.49"/>, which implies that conditional independence in the observed distribution generated by the structural causal model above implies directional separation (i.e. separation of variables by conditioning on appropriate sets of other variables) in the associated time series graph and vice versa.</p>
      <p id="d2e1960">We conducted a series of sensitivity tests with various settings of significance level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the maximum time delay <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but only used the causal graphs with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the toy model (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>), and with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>). Since some of the analyzed variables have non-gaussian distributions, we use the RobustParCorr conditional independence test, which transforms the data to a normal distribution before the partial correlation test. This usage implies that we assume the functions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the model above to be linear. As a trade-off to its ability to also deal with latent confounding, LPCMCI suffers from lower recall compared to, e.g., PCMCI+ <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.50"/>. Despite this, LPCMCI successfully identified causal connections in observational data that align closely with expert knowledge and the literature review. However, LPCMCI did not robustly detect anticipated connections in the TOMCAT CTM simulation. To estimate the direct causal effects for the period 2004–2021 in the TOMCAT CTM simulation, we refined the causal graphs by incorporating expert knowledge and insights from the literature review (as further discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/> and depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Causal effect estimation</title>
      <p id="d2e2077">Over a hundred years ago, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="text.51"/> suggested a method to estimate causal effects in linear models. This approach estimates the so-called path coefficients for all links in causal paths and then sums the products of these path coefficients over all causal paths. This method applies only to DAGs; therefore, in the case of DPAG, we ensure that all edges are directed before applying causal effect estimation. Causal effect estimation consists of the following steps: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2085">For all causal links <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that belong to causal paths from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a parent and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a child), estimate the path coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by regressing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on all its parents in a multivariate regression and taking the coefficient corresponding to parent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.52"><named-content content-type="pre">see e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e2165">The causal effect is then computed as:<disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex2"><mml:math id="M145" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">causal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">paths</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">link</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">path</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>By restricting this estimator to paths that pass through at least one node among a selected set of mediators <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it is also possible to compute mediated causal effects (MCE). These are defined as:<disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M147" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MCE</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>causal paths through at least one </mml:mtext><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>∈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∏</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>link </mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mtext> in path</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Process-oriented causal inference framework</title>
      <p id="d2e2283">To quantitatively characterize O<sub>3</sub> variability in the tropical middle stratosphere during 2004–2021, we employ a process-oriented causal inference approach depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>. Although causal analysis has already gained significant application in atmospheric sciences, including the analysis of Arctic processes and their links to middle latitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx40" id="paren.53"/>, teleconnections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.54"/>, atmosphere-biosphere interactions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.55"/>, and evaluating climate models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.56"/> and their sensitivities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.57"/>, it has not yet been applied to the study of stratospheric chemical-dynamical interactions.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2315">Process-oriented causal inference framework built upon three essential components (blue squares): (1) a causal graph, (2) data, and (3) a method for causal effect estimation. To construct the (1) causal graph for the studied system, a triangulated approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.58"/> is applied, integrating (i) expert knowledge, (ii) a literature review, and (iii) a data-driven causal discovery algorithm. Before applying the (iii) causal discovery algorithm to real-world data, we construct a (iv) toy model to assess the performance of the selected (iii) causal discovery algorithm. The final (1) causal graph, based on (2) real-world data, serves as a foundation for estimating (3) causal effects, which can be further refined through process-oriented analysis, including masking on atmospheric regimes and additional sensitivity tests.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2327">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> outlines the process-oriented causal inference framework, which is built upon three essential components (blue squares): (1) a causal graph that contains information about qualitative cause-and-effect relationships <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="paren.59"/>, (2) observational and/or modeled data, and (3) a method for estimating causal effects. To construct (1) the causal graph, we employ a triangulated approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.60"/> that integrates (i) expert knowledge, (ii) a comprehensive literature review, and (iii) a data-driven causal discovery algorithm. While each of these components can independently contribute to the creation of the causal graph, we recommend employing the triangulated approach to ensure a more robust and reliable framework. To assess the performance of the selected (iii) causal discovery algorithm before applying it to real-world data, we first construct a (iv) “toy model” using synthetic data. This synthetic dataset is designed to replicate the properties and challenges of the real system while incorporating known underlying ground truth from (i) expert knowledge and (ii) a literature review. The toy model is then used to evaluate the performance of the causal discovery method in realistic, finite sample scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.61"/>. To ensure the robustness of the results, it is recommended to further perform sensitivity tests on free algorithm parameters, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for (iii) the causal discovery algorithm and (iv) the toy model.</p>
      <p id="d2e2365">It is important to note that if (iii) the causal discovery algorithm does not robustly detect anticipated relationships in the analyzed (2) real-world or modelled data, the user can integrate physical knowledge into the algorithm. Alternatively, the causal graph may be constrained purely based on (i) expert knowledge and (ii) a comprehensive literature review, including previous successful applications of causal discovery to related research topics. The final (1) causal graph, derived from (2) real-world data, serves as a foundation for estimating (3) direct and total causal effects. Causal effect estimation can be further refined through a process-oriented analysis, such as, for example, masking on different atmospheric regimes. Additionally, (v) total causal effects can be assessed across different time lags. This complex approach outlined in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> ensures robust and reliable causal inference, particularly for complex systems such as the stratospheric chemical-dynamical interactions investigated here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Confidence intervals and masking for regime-oriented analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e2378">Confidence intervals for direct causal effect estimates, computed using Wright's path coefficient (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS2"/>), were obtained via bootstrapping with 500 repetitions. Only significant direct causal effects are shown, defined as those for which the bootstrap confidence interval does not include 0. For both direct and total causal effects across different time lags (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>), confidence intervals were also obtained from 500-member bootstrapping. Because the causal effect estimates were conducted on the same data as the prior causal discovery step, the confidence intervals do not cover the uncertainty from this prior model-selection step. In our case, this issue is less pronounced because the causal graph was based on a triangulation and not fully data-driven.</p>
      <p id="d2e2385">For the regime-oriented analysis of causal effects during different QBO phases (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3"/>), we first calculate the QBO wind shear as the vertical gradient of the zonal mean zonal wind between 10 and 30 hPa. For observations, the shear is derived directly from radiosonde-based zonal wind at the two pressure levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.62"/>. For the TOMCAT CTM simulation, the zonal wind is first averaged over 10° S–10° N before computing the vertical gradient between 10 and 30 hPa. The resulting shear time series is subsequently standardized for use in the process-oriented causal analysis. Positive (negative) values correspond to a westerly (easterly) shear zone, which plays a key role in modulating secondary circulation and stratospheric transport. We focus on the 10–30 hPa shear layer since no data is available above 10 hPa in the observational record used here.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and Discussions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Causal justification and validation with a toy model</title>
      <p id="d2e2409">Before applying causal discovery to analyze chemical–dynamical interactions using observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation, we first summarize the relationships of O<sub>3</sub> variability in this region in a shape of DAG-based on expert knowledge and literature review <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.63"><named-content content-type="pre">as discussed and interpreted by e.g.</named-content></xref>, following the procedure discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a depicts a simple linear chain from the cause <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the outcome O<sub>3</sub> (grey nodes), with mediating variables N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> (magenta nodes). The inferred DAG, therefore, represents an effective causal structure that emerges under the influence of dynamical variability, rather than a representation of isolated chemical relationships.  In particular, a positive relationship from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O (labelled A) indicates that an increase in residual vertical velocity leads to enhanced N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations. The relationship from N<sub>2</sub>O to NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (labelled B) is negative, despite N<sub>2</sub>O being a source of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. This apparent contradiction is an example of Simpson's paradox <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.64"/> and arises because tropical residual velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> acts as a confounding dynamical process, leading to an anti-correlation between N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub>. Namely, slower (faster) upwelling results in lower (higher) N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations and consequently longer (shorter) N<sub>2</sub>O residence time in this region, which allows more (less) time for the photochemical production of NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> from N<sub>2</sub>O. Consequently, higher (lower) NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> levels lead to lower (higher) O<sub>3</sub> concentrations via the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-catalyzed O<sub>3</sub> destruction cycle, resulting in a negative relationship <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.65"><named-content content-type="pre">labelled C, see</named-content></xref>. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/> summarizes the discussed chemical-dynamical relationships in the tropical middle stratosphere as depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a.</p>
      <p id="d2e2651">We further justify the assumed causal DAG in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and validate the reliability of the causal inference method. For this, we require a benchmark dataset with known causal ground truth for validation as depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a. We consider the linear structural causal process with four time series as an example that comes from a data-generating process using the following model:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M174" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for the independent Gaussian white noise processes with variances <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depicts residual vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – the concentration of N<sub>2</sub>O, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> – O<sub>3</sub>. This set of variables and their dependencies define a toy model. Although this toy model is designed to replicate causal dependencies in the tropical middle stratosphere, it is important to emphasize that there are multiple approaches to constructing such a model. While additional variables could be further introduced based on expert knowledge and a thorough literature review, the goal of the analysis here is not to maximize the number of variables but to create an intuitive system that can simply and effectively replicate the processes under study.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2962">Causal justification and validation. <bold>(a)</bold> Assumed relationships based on expert knowledge and literature review. Magenta nodes indicate mediators in the total influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub>. <bold>(b–e)</bold> Causal discovery applied to a generated toy model with contemporaneous (time lag <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) and lagged (time lag <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) dependencies based on linear partial correlation as a conditional independence test for 120 time steps <bold>(b)</bold> and 240 time steps <bold>(c)</bold>, which corresponds to the DPAG. The application of the triangulated approach from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> resulted in the DAG <bold>(d)</bold>, which in turn was used as a basis for causal effect estimation, where edge colors indicate the estimated direct causal effects <bold>(e)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3033">Summary of chemical-dynamical processes in the tropical middle stratosphere.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="10.5cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Label in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Connection</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Link type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<sub>2</sub>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">positive</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">Transport is the primary source of stratospheric N<sub>2</sub>O. In addition to determining N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations (an increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to an increase of N<sub>2</sub>O), it also affects its residence time (an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to a shorter residence time of N<sub>2</sub>O).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">negative</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">N<sub>2</sub>O is the primary source of NO<sub>2</sub> via the slow reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed by the rapid reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As N<sub>2</sub>O increases due to faster circulation, its residence time decreases, and therefore, NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations decline (there is less time to produce NO<sub>2</sub>). The resulting link is therefore negative. In the absence of dynamical variability, the relationship would appear positive, reflecting only the underlying chemical production of NO<sub>2</sub> from N<sub>2</sub>O.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">negative</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4" align="left">NO<sub>2</sub> is the primary sink of O<sub>3</sub> in the tropical middle stratosphere via the NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) catalytic cycle.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e3427">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b–e illustrate the causal graphs inferred from the causal discovery algorithm (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>) when applied to the toy model from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). To evaluate the performance of the causal discovery algorithm on time series of different lengths, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b, c show causal graphs for generated time series of 120 time steps (equivalent to 10 years of monthly data) and 240 time steps (equivalent to 20 years), respectively. When applied to the shorter time series (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b), causal discovery fails to detect several expected connections as anticipated from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a, likely due to limitations in the toy model, such as weaker causal signals or higher noise. In contrast, despite the plausible limitations of the toy model, most expected connections are recovered in the 20-year time series depicted in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c. However, the inferred graph lacks directionality between N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> (shown as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> edge), resulting in a DPAG. Since causal effect estimation requires a fully directed DAG, we applied the triangulation approach to resolve ambiguities, yielding the DAG in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>d. This final causal graph (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>d) serves as the basis for causal effect estimation, shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>e. Given approximately linear relationships among analyzed variables (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b–d), we assume linear causal effects and apply Wright’s method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.66"/>. This approach is akin to linear regression slopes between two variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the critical distinction that the graph is used to detect and eliminate confounding influences before regression <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.67"><named-content content-type="pre">see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/> and</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3511">Causal inference: Magnitude and sign of the direct causal effects. The direct causal effects calculated for <bold>(a)</bold> the observations and <bold>(b)</bold> the TOMCAT CTM simulation from the detrended monthly anomalies for 2004–2021. Straight arrows show the contemporaneous (time lag <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0) connections; curved arrows indicate lagged links (time lag <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); edge color stands for the estimated direct causal effects. For TOMCAT, causal graphs identified from the observations were used, and direct causal effects were estimated using the TOMCAT data.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Physical description of observed and modeled causal relations</title>
      <p id="d2e3551">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> presents the magnitude and sign of direct causal effects computed using Wright's approach <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.68"/> on causal graphs identified by the triangulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.69"/> based on observations (a) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (b) during 2004–2021. The original graphs inferred by the causal discovery algorithm (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>) without the application of the triangulated approach are shown in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>. The causal discovery algorithm successfully identifies the anticipated connections in the observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a) since the signs of the direct causal effects align well with the expected processes outlined in the Introduction and as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3571">Notably, the positive lagged link in observations from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O indicates that an increase in residual vertical velocity intensifies N<sub>2</sub>O transport. This enhanced transport, in turn, reduces the residence time of N<sub>2</sub>O, leading to less time for NO<sub>2</sub> production via the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (also labelled B in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a). Consequently, the causal contemporaneous link from N<sub>2</sub>O to NO<sub>2</sub> reflects the negative relationship confounded by upwelling. The negative contemporaneous link from NO<sub>2</sub> to O<sub>3</sub> indicates that lower/higher NO<sub>2</sub> levels are associated with higher/lower O<sub>3</sub> concentrations, as O<sub>3</sub> loss in the tropical middle stratosphere is largely driven by catalytic destruction by NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>. Causal discovery further detects a bidirected connection between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<sub>3</sub> in the observations, indicating the presence of a latent common driver of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<sub>3</sub> and that neither variable is an ancestor of the other (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/>a). As causal effect estimation requires a DAG, we define the direction from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to O<sub>3</sub> to quantify the strength of this link. This choice allows us to estimate the direct dynamical influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub>, which is sometimes identified by a causal discovery algorithm in sensitivity tests. Based on Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, the direct influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> is much weaker, and a mediated pathway via N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> dominates. However, temperature-mediated effects could amplify the apparent strength of the connection from NO<sub>2</sub> to O<sub>3</sub>, since enhanced upwelling induces both cooling (increasing O<sub>3</sub>) and reduced NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> species. To assess this, we performed additional analysis, including temperature anomalies in the tropical middle stratosphere. The inferred graph structure was not robust, likely because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a derived diagnostic that depends on thermodynamic fields. Removing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> altered the parent structure and prevented a direct comparison of direct causal effects shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a. We therefore interpret the identified NO<sub>2</sub>-mediated pathway as the dominant mechanism, while acknowledging that temperature-related effects may potentially project onto this link.</p>
      <p id="d2e3933">Unlike the observations, in the TOMCAT CTM simulation, the causal discovery algorithm does not fully reproduce the expected chemical-dynamical coupling as outlined in the Introduction, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/> and as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a. In particular, the anticipated one-month lagged link from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O is not robustly detected. We found that this occurs because O<sub>3</sub> exhibits very strong contemporaneous coupling with both N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub>, such that conditioning on O<sub>3</sub> makes the one-month lagged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O link statistically insignificant. As further demonstrated and discussed in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>, this does not indicate a lack of dynamical coupling in the TOMCAT CTM simulation. Instead, it reflects the strong shared variability among the chemical tracers as the model uses a chemically consistent scheme for all the variables. In order to still assess the strength of the processes represented in TOMCAT, we therefore did not rely on the TOMCAT-derived graph. Instead, by adopting a fixed graph structure derived from observational ground truth and expert knowledge, we can accurately estimate direct causal effects with the TOMCAT data (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b), providing a valid and pragmatic solution for quantifying model sensitivities. Similar to observations, the direct one-month lagged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N<sub>2</sub>O connection is estimated as significant in the TOMCAT CTM simulation for the analyzed period. Additionally, the N<sub>2</sub>O-NO<sub>2</sub> negative contemporaneous link is slightly stronger in the TOMCAT CTM simulation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b) compared to those in the observations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a), with a similar causal pattern observed for the NO<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> link.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e4086">Sensitivity tests of the detected links to the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (depicted with markers) for the observations for the period 2004–2021. For all tests, the minimum time delay <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Only link pairs shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> are considered.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4141">To ensure the robustness of the connections detected in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a in observations in the tropical middle stratosphere during the period 2004–2021, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> demonstrates the results of the application of the causal discovery algorithm with different setups of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (depicted on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (depicted with markers). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is set to zero to account for the contemporaneous connections. It should be noted that choosing a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that is too low risks missing causal links with longer delays, which violates the assumption of causal sufficiency. However, choosing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> too high without mitigation can dilute the detection power of the causal algorithm. Specifically, a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> expands the search, as the algorithm tests more possible lagged pairs. This leads to larger conditioning sets, which can further reduce the effect size and detection power. Therefore, it is important to condition only on a few relevant variables that actually explain the relationship <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.70"/>. Sensitivity tests from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> show very similar results for different configurations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The chemical connections related to N<sub>2</sub>O-NO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> pairs are robustly detected as contemporaneous across all experiments. The dynamical connections <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-N<sub>2</sub>O and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-O<sub>3</sub> are robustly detected with a one-month lag.</p>
      <p id="d2e4327">A further analysis of the sensitivity experiments reveals an additional feature in the N<sub>2</sub>O-NO<sub>2</sub> relationship. A positive one-month lagged link from N<sub>2</sub>O to NO<sub>2</sub> is detected across all tested <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but primarily at relaxed significance thresholds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the link is also identified at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.05. Such a positive lagged connection is physically plausible, as NO<sub>2</sub> is produced from N<sub>2</sub>O, as discussed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>, and a delayed response may emerge at the monthly timeseries. However, given its sensitivity to the choice of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this link cannot be considered a robust pathway.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4457">Regime-oriented direct causal effects from <bold>(a)</bold> observations and <bold>(b)</bold> the TOMCAT CTM simulation for the full 2004–2021 period (blue), and for easterly (orange) and westerly (green) QBO regimes.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Process-oriented analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e4480">We adapt the process-oriented causal analysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx18" id="paren.71"/> to major drivers of tropical middle stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> variability to further understand the robustness of the connections during different regimes. Given that N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> exhibit a strong QBO signal <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx74 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.72"/>, we mask the data to easterly and westerly shear zones (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS4"/>). This approach makes it possible to explore the regime-dependent robustness of causal relationships. A robust connection between specific variables indicates that the particular link is consistently detected across multiple resampled datasets. A robust connection also suggests that the relationship is less sensitive to variations in the data, providing higher confidence that the detected connection is not a result of random fluctuations or sampling variability. It is also important to note that the analyzed period includes an unprecedented QBO disruption in 2016 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.73"/>, which stalled the descent of the easterly shear toward 10 hPa and caused anomalous upwelling and wind patterns, temporarily altering transport and mixing in the tropical middle stratosphere. To assess how QBO phase affects the strength of the identified relationships, we keep the causal graph inferred from the full period and re-estimate the link strengths separately for easterly and westerly QBO conditions. This approach isolates regime-oriented changes in coupling strength without altering the underlying network structure. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> illustrates the estimated direct causal effects for both observations (panel a) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (panel b) for the full period 2004–2021 (blue), which also corresponds to direct causal effects shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a,b, easterly (orange), and westerly phase of the QBO.</p>
      <p id="d2e4535">The dynamical positive link from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O at a lag of one month shows slightly reduced magnitude in observations when separating into QBO phases compared to the full period. In the TOMCAT CTM simulation, the link strength is similar to observations and also slightly reduces across QBO phases. The negative contemporaneous chemical coupling between N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> is stronger in the TOMCAT CTM simulation compared to observations and of similar strength across phases. In observations, the absolute magnitude is slightly larger during the westerly phase than during the easterly phase. The contemporaneous negative link from NO<sub>2</sub> to O<sub>3</sub> is likewise stronger in the TOMCAT CTM simulation compared to the observations. In the observations, this link weakens during the easterly QBO phase, whereas in the TOMCAT CTM simulation its magnitude is comparatively stable across QBO phases.</p>
      <p id="d2e4595">The imposed one-month lagged connection from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to O<sub>3</sub> is the weakest among the analyzed pathways and substantially smaller than the chemically mediated pathway. In the TOMCAT CTM simulation, no link is detected for the easterly QBO phase. This phase-dependent absence of this connection points to its limited robustness. This also indicates that the direct influence of the residual circulation on O<sub>3</sub> variability is predominantly mediated through N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub>, rather than through a direct dynamical effect. Overall, the sign of all connections is robust across datasets and QBO phases. In the observations, the chemical links (from N<sub>2</sub>O to NO<sub>2</sub> and from NO<sub>2</sub> to O<sub>3</sub>) tend to strengthen during the westerly QBO phase.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Causal effects across different time lags</title>
      <p id="d2e4690">While the causal discovery algorithm, along with causal effects estimation of the direct links, offers a general overview of whether the methodology captures the expected dependencies, one can further study the propagation of causal effects through the causal graph across different time lags. The total causal effects (for further discussions, see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>), which are not necessarily just depicted by a single arrow in the causal graph, can be derived from direct causal effects using Wright's path analysis for specific relationships across different time lags. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> shows total (lines) and direct (labels) causal effects across different time lags for a selection of different (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) pairs of variables, where a positive connection, similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, indicates that an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> after a time lag (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Due to the limited number of variables in the causal graphs, we do not analyze the role of mediators for specific connections, as their influence is straightforward. For example, the total causal effect from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to NO<sub>2</sub> is mediated solely by N<sub>2</sub>O, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>. However, for the analyses that involve more complex causal graphs, similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.74"/>, we recommend estimating the contribution of various mediators on a specific set of connections.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e4772">Total causal effects across different time lags in months from observations (solid lines) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (dashed) for <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on N<sub>2</sub>O, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on NO<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub>, <bold>(d)</bold> N<sub>2</sub>O on NO<sub>2</sub>, <bold>(e)</bold> N<sub>2</sub>O on O<sub>3</sub>, <bold>(f)</bold> NO<sub>2</sub> on O<sub>3</sub>. All plots show the results obtained for 2004–2021 (blue), easterly (orange), and westerly QBO phase (green). The markers indicate direct causal impact similar to Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>. The shading corresponds to the 90 % bootstrap confidence interval.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4920">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> demonstrates that the total causal effects across different time lags in the TOMCAT CTM simulation (dashed lines) closely align with observations (solid lines) across analyzed regimes, indicating that the model reproduces not only the sign but also the temporal structure of the effects. However, the amplitudes in the TOMCAT CTM simulation are slightly larger, suggesting a somewhat stronger coupling between analyzed variables in the simulation. The direct causal effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on N<sub>2</sub>O (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a) exhibits a clear maximum at a lag of around three months for the full period 2004–2021. The total causal effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on NO<sub>2</sub> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b) and on O<sub>3</sub> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c and Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S4"/>) also show similar lagged maxima for the full period 2004–2021. This lagged behavior likely indicates the spatiotemporal structure of the covariability between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies at the analyzed 10 hPa level and below. Upwelling anomalies are primarily governed by the QBO and descend over time with the associated shear zones. As a result, an anomaly in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 10 hPa, originating from higher altitudes, produces an instantaneous but modest local effect on composition, while over subsequent months, it persists and increasingly affects lower altitudes. This leads to a cumulative impact on N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>2</sub>, and consequently O<sub>3</sub>, with a delayed maximum in the total causal effect. The timing of this maximum is therefore linked to the vertical extent of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomaly and the rate at which QBO shear zones descend.</p>
      <p id="d2e5045">We can further decompose the total causal effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> into direct and indirect contributions. As shown by Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a, the direct one-month lagged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the O<sub>3</sub> pathway is approximately 0.10 in the observations and 0.14 in the TOMCAT CTM simulation. The indirect contribution, mediated via N<sub>2</sub>O and subsequently NO<sub>2</sub>, reaches 0.16 in the observations and 0.23 in the simulation (not shown here). Therefore, the total causal effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c at a lag of one month therefore represents the sum of both pathways, yielding approximately 0.26 for the observations and 0.37 for the TOMCAT CTM simulation over the full analyzed period. The same analysis is performed for the easterly and westerly QBO phases, but an analogous description is not discussed further. Conditioning on both N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> does not alter the magnitude of the mediated effect, indicating that the dominant indirect pathway proceeds sequentially through <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5190">The N<sub>2</sub>O on NO<sub>2</sub> relationship (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d) strengthens gradually with increasing lag, with close agreement between observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation after two to three months. Differences are largest at short lags, where the observational estimate shows stronger variability. The observations suggest that this link appears weaker during easterly QBO shear, linked to vertical ascent due to the strengthening of tropical upwelling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.75"/>. The total N<sub>2</sub>O to O<sub>3</sub> effect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e) increases from lag zero to lag one (in the observations) and then gradually decreases toward longer lags. Here, observations also show a weaker total causal effect during easterly QBO phase. These results are also consistent with direct causal effects analyzed for different QBO regimes (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). The NO<sub>2</sub> on O<sub>3</sub> effect (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>f) peaks at lag zero and rapidly decreases, approaching zero after about one month. This behavior is consistent with fast NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub>-driven O<sub>3</sub> chemistry. A slightly longer persistence during the earlier subperiod suggests a more sustained influence of NO<sub>2</sub> on O<sub>3</sub> during that time.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5306">This study applies causal inference to quantify the contributions of chemical-dynamical drivers that control O<sub>3</sub> variability in the tropical middle stratosphere. Using a causal discovery algorithm applied to observations over the 2004–2021 period, we robustly identify a dominant chemical–dynamical pathway, in which variability in residual vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> modulates N<sub>2</sub>O, subsequently affecting NO<sub>2</sub> and ultimately O<sub>3</sub>. The resulting causal graphs are then used within the causal inference framework to quantify the temporal contribution of specific variables on monthly O<sub>3</sub> variability under different QBO phases and to separate the direct and mediated causal effects. In the TOMCAT CTM simulation, strong shared variability among the chemical tracers limited the ability of the discovery algorithm to detect the expected dynamical coupling. Therefore, we applied observational graphs based on triangulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.76"/> to estimate causal relationships in the TOMCAT monthly data. This example illustrates a practical workaround for cases where models or datasets do not yield the expected causal structure through discovery. Importantly, estimating direct or total causal effects does not require that the graph be learned by an algorithm since a graph informed by expert knowledge and supported by the literature can serve as a valid alternative <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.77"/>. In our case, the close agreement between the observationally derived graph and the main relationships anticipated from established chemical-dynamical interactions (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> and as discussed in the Introduction) demonstrates that the discovery algorithm can indeed recover the expected structure when applied to suitable data. Additionally, the toy model validation further demonstrates reliability under finite-sample conditions (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>). Therefore, the methodology adopted in this study, which integrates triangulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.78"/> for the construction of causal graphs and an algorithm for causal effect estimation, demonstrates a comprehensive approach to causal inference. This ensures the robustness of the analyzed system and facilitates the quantification of specific connections in a physically meaningful domain.</p>
      <p id="d2e5379">Direct causal effects applied to the observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation reveal that tropical middle-stratospheric O<sub>3</sub> variability is dominated by an indirect NO<sub>2</sub>-mediated pathway, consistent with previous studies of chemical–dynamical coupling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx58 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.79"><named-content content-type="pre">see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> and e.g.</named-content></xref>. This mechanism of identified connections captures variability under different QBO phases via regime-oriented analysis and is also supported by sensitivity tests. For example, the direct influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> is weak and not robust across QBO phases. The total causal effects that consist of direct and mediated pathways peak at a lag of approximately two-three months (as discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>), associated with the cumulative impact of persistent, vertically coupled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> anomalies linked to the QBO. The process-oriented analysis for different QBO phases applied to the observations suggests that the chemical links between N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> strengthen during westerly shear compared to easterly shear (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). Additional sensitivity tests, including temperature anomalies in the tropical middle stratosphere, did not yield a robust and interpretable graph. Temperature-related effects may therefore partly project onto the identified NO<sub>2</sub>-mediated pathway, but within the present framework their contribution cannot be robustly separated and quantified.</p>
      <p id="d2e5491">Our study highlights the pivotal role causal inference can play in identifying, disentangling, and quantifying complex physical and chemical-dynamical processes in the stratosphere. This work lays the foundation for extending the application of causal inference to other areas involving complex chemical-dynamical interactions. Given its potential, this approach is particularly valuable for systems with connections that are not well understood. In the scope of the application of causal inference to stratospheric chemical-dynamical research, we emphasize the following limitation to the reader. The present analysis considers variability at a single pressure level of 10 hPa and does not explicitly resolve the vertical structure of the analyzed system. In the tropical stratosphere, where air is continuously ascending, variability at a given level is dynamically linked to conditions at lower altitudes. As a result, within such a single-level framework, the identified total lagged causal effects (discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS4"/>) reflect a combination of local processes and effects arising from vertical coupling in the circulation. Some of the further general limitations and challenges are discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx31" id="text.80"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5499">We would like to highlight that an integration of causal reasoning into data-driven science will help us to enhance the understanding of complex processes and will support the development of robust methodologies that combine machine learning with statistical approaches. This integration is especially relevant for Earth and environmental sciences, as it benefits both observational and modelling studies. Causal inference has already proven to be an effective tool for climate model evaluation, particularly by enabling comparisons between causal graphs derived from models and those based on observations. This emerging methodology is gaining traction in process-oriented climate model evaluation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.81"/> and offers valuable insights into the physical mechanisms driving the varying performance of different models. Notably, causal model evaluation not only identifies physically based connections but can also reveal the processes that are poorly represented in models. We also identify a key direction for future research focused on cross-evaluating the process-oriented performance of different CTMs and coupled CCMs. Such efforts could provide valuable insights into model accuracy and the reliability of CCMs, ensuring that the distribution of simulated species or processes is not driven by incorrect or unknown factors. Additionally, integrating causal inference with well-established statistical methods could further advance stratospheric studies, particularly in analyzing the variability of chemical species. Testing these approaches across different chemical and dynamical processes in various stratospheric regions represents a promising avenue for improving model evaluation and understanding complex interactions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Glossary</title>
      <p id="d2e5517">Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/> summarizes commonly used terms in this manuscript and provides brief examples illustrating their application in this study. For further acquaintance with the terminology, we refer the reader to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65" id="text.82"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="TA1"><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d2e5529">Glossary linking causal inference terminology to stratospheric chemistry context.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="7cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="7cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Term</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Formal meaning</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Stratospheric example</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Causal graph</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Graphical model, where nodes correspond to physical quantities and edges represent direction and associated time lags of assumed or learned direct causal influences.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Residual vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used as a proxy for upwelling in the tropical middle stratosphere, influencing N<sub>2</sub>O concentrations and thereby affecting NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>. The anticipated graph is: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Causal effect</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Change in one variable due to an intervention on another variable. In the linear case and with standardized time series, causal effect estimates are in units of standard deviations (but not confined to the interval [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 1]). Unlike correlation, causal effects are directional and account for confounding and mediation if the assumed graph is correct.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">How will N<sub>2</sub>O change if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is altered? From Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, the direct one-month lagged causal effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on N<sub>2</sub>O is around 0.28 for both (a) the observations and (b) the TOMCAT CTM simulation. This means a 1-standard deviation change in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to a 0.28 standard deviation change in N<sub>2</sub>O.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Connection</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">An open path between two variables in a causal graph according to the directional separation criterion (not necessarily causal).</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and N<sub>2</sub>O (moderate correlation from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a) and direct one-month lagged causal connection from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O (e.g. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>), reflecting the influence of upwelling on tracer transport.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dependency</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">A statistical association between two variables that, assuming faithfulness, may arise from a connection in the causal graph due to direct causation, indirect pathways, or common drivers. Can be instantaneous or lagged.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Lagged (partial) correlations show how dependencies decay with time (see further Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2"/>) across different variable pairs.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Direct causal effect</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Direct causal influence through a directed causal link, not mediated by other variables. In linear models, the direct causal effect corresponds to the regression coefficient of a predictor on a response when conditioning on its parents.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">NO<sub>2</sub> directly affecting O<sub>3</sub>. For example, the direct causal effect of NO<sub>2</sub> on O<sub>3</sub> in observations for the analyzed 2004–2021 period is equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a).</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Edge</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">An adjacency between two nodes. This may be directed, bidirected, or unoriented.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<sub>2</sub>O.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Latent variable</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Unobserved, hidden variable influencing the system.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Solar forcing is a strong common driver of many processes. If not included in the causal graph, it will act as a latent variable, causing the appearance of spurious links <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.83"/>. To account for this effect, the analyzed time series should be either anomalized (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>) or solar forcing can be included in the causal graph as a node.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mediator</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Variable on the causal path between two variables.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> serve as mediators linking <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to O<sub>3</sub>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Node</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">A variable represented in a graph.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>3</sub>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total causal effect</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Causal effect across both direct and indirectly mediated causal paths between two variables. In a simple causal structure without mediators, the total causal effect is equal to the direct causal effect.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effect on O<sub>3</sub> via all pathways: direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> O<sub>3</sub> and mediated via N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> N<sub>2</sub>O <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mo>→</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>O<sub>3</sub>.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Comparison of observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation</title>
      <p id="d2e6190">The detrended monthly mean anomalies in the tropical middle stratosphere from observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation that were used for the causal inference are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/>. Monthly anomalies from the TOMCAT CTM simulation closely align with observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e6195">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB2"/> depicts lagged dependencies from observations (blue) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (orange) in the tropical middle stratosphere during 2004–2021 using the RobustParCorr class, i.e., computing lagged correlations after transforming all marginal distributions to Gaussians. Overall, the model reproduces both the sign and the magnitude of the observed relationships across most variable pairs and lags, with correlations generally decreasing in magnitude with increasing time lag. The autocorrelations of the analyzed variables are mostly similar between observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation, except for NO<sub>2</sub>, which exhibits slightly stronger autocorrelation in the TOMCAT CTM simulation across all time lags compared to observations. The connections between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<sub>3</sub> (first row, last column), N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> (second row, third column), and O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> (last row, third column) also show stronger lagged dependencies in the TOMCAT CTM simulation in comparison to observations.</p>

      <fig id="FB1"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e6268">Monthly mean detrended anomalies in the tropical middle stratosphere during 2004–2021 in observations (blue) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (orange). The TOMCAT CTM data is masked to match the occurrence of the observations.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e6280">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB3"/> depicts kernel density estimates of the joint and marginal (diagonal panels) densities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<sub>2</sub>O, NO<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>3</sub> in the tropical middle stratosphere. Color coding corresponds to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB2"/>. The contours illustrate the covariance structure between the variables, and the annotated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate the lag at which the strongest association is found. The overall orientation of the contours is similar between observations and the TOMCAT CTM simulation, suggesting that the model captures the main sign of the relationships.</p>
      <p id="d2e6334">It is important to highlight that the lagged dependencies (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB2"/>) and density plots (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB3"/>) only quantify pairwise co-variability. They do not separate direct from indirect causal effects and do not condition on other variables. Therefore, the lag at which the correlation is strongest should not be interpreted as the lag of a direct causal interaction. In a system with common dynamical forcing and persistence, pairwise correlations can reflect mixed pathways operating on different time scales.</p><fig id="FB2"><label>Figure B2</label><caption><p id="d2e6343">Lagged dependencies in the tropical middle stratosphere during 2004-2021 in observations (blue) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (orange) based on the RobustParCorr class.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f09.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FB3"><label>Figure B3</label><caption><p id="d2e6357">Density estimates of the joint and marginal densities over tropical middle stratosphere during 2004–2021 in observations (blue) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (orange) based on the RobustParCorr class.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f10.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Graphs inferred by the causal discovery algorithm and sensitivity testing</title>
      <p id="d2e6378">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/> shows the causal graphs detected by the LPCMCI algorithm for the observations (a) and the TOMCAT CTM simulation (b) for the period 2004–2021 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in. For the observations, the causal discovery algorithm does not identify the direction of the N<sub>2</sub>O–O<sub>3</sub> link. In addition, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<sub>3</sub> connection is detected as bidirectional, indicating the presence of a latent common driver of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<sub>3</sub> rather than a resolved causal direction. For the TOMCAT CTM simulation, in contrast to observations, the causal discovery algorithm does not detect the anticipated negative link from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O, however captures the negative contemporaneous links (without directions) between N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub>, and NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6529">Further analysis of the output from the causal discovery from the observations revealed that the algorithm successfully identified a significant lagged causal link from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O, indicating that past values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have a direct influence on N<sub>2</sub>O. This relationship remained significant even after conditioning on other variables and their lags, suggesting a robust causal connection. In contrast, in the TOMCAT CTM simulation, the same lagged link was initially detected but became statistically insignificant once O<sub>3</sub> was included in the conditioning set, indicating that O<sub>3</sub> explains most of the shared variability between transport and N<sub>2</sub>O.  To further investigate the reason for the removal of one-month lagged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O link in the TOMCAT CTM simulation for the period 2004–2021, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC2"/> shows the results of causal discovery after excluding O<sub>3</sub> from the variable set. In this reduced setup, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O one-month lagged link reappeared and was statistically significant across tested <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This indicates that the previously missing transport signal is not due to a lack of dynamical coupling in the TOMCAT CTM simulation, but rather to conditional independence induced by the strong covariance among the chemical variables. In the TOMCAT CTM simulation, O<sub>3</sub> has strong instantaneous coupling with both N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub>, and therefore accounts for a large part of their common variability. Consequently, once conditioning on O<sub>3</sub>, the remaining unique contribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O variability is no longer statistically detectable. The re-emergence of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to N<sub>2</sub>O link in the reduced system (without O<sub>3</sub>) therefore indicates that the transport influence is present, but in the full multivariate setup it becomes statistically hidden because the strongly coupled chemical tracers (O<sub>3</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O, and O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub>) explain most of the same variability.</p><fig id="FC1"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e6788">Causal graphs detected by the causal discovery algorithm from <bold>(a)</bold> observations and <bold>(b)</bold> the TOMCAT CTM simulation for the period 2004–2021 with significance level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f11.png"/>

      </fig>

<fig id="FC2"><label>Figure C2</label><caption><p id="d2e6837">Causal graphs detected by the causal discovery algorithm from the TOMCAT CTM simulation for the period 2004–2021 with different significance levels <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pc</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S4">
  <label>Appendix D</label><title>Total causal effects</title>
      <p id="d2e6882">To better understand the causal effects across different time lags, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD1"/> depicts (a) time-collapsed and (b) time-unfolded causal graphs based on the observational causal graph detected in Fig.<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a in the manuscript. As an example, the total causal effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> (green nodes) consists of a direct path from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to O<sub>3</sub> and an indirect path, which is mediated by N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> (violet nodes) as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD1"/>a. The indirect path of the influence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> is then better represented via a time series causal graph (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FD1"/>b). The total causal effect across different time lags of this relationship is shown and discussed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c in the manuscript.</p>

      <fig id="FD1"><label>Figure D1</label><caption><p id="d2e6977">Example of the total causal effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on O<sub>3</sub> (green) as a sum of a direct lagged link and indirect via N<sub>2</sub>O and NO<sub>2</sub> mediators (violet) in the time-collapsed graph <bold>(a)</bold>, which corresponds to the causal graph from observations shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a and time-unfolded graph <bold>(b)</bold>. </p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f13.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S5">
  <label>Appendix E</label><title>Dependencies vs. causal effects across different time lags</title>
      <p id="d2e7044">The lagged unconditional dependencies, such as the lagged correlations based on partial correlation, are helpful to identify the maximal time lag <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to choose in the causal discovery algorithm. However, large autocorrelation might inflate lag peaks <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.84"/>. To condition out some part of the autocorrelation, the bivariate, lagged CI test (partial correlation as an example) can be applied. The comparison between the lagged dependencies from both tests is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FE1"/>. We also plot lagged dependencies based on the calculated Wright coefficient (labeled as “causal effects”), which directly indicates the strength of causal relationships and takes into account the direction of causal influence (see, e.g. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> in the manuscript). For example, the causal effects in the last row in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FE1"/> are all zero since O<sub>3</sub> is not a cause of any analyzed variable in the system.</p>

      <fig id="FE1"><label>Figure E1</label><caption><p id="d2e7079">Lagged dependencies across different time lags (in months) from observations for the period 2004–2021 based on partial correlations (blue), bivariate partial correlations (green), and estimated Wright coefficients (magenta).</p></caption>
        
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/8185/2026/acp-26-8185-2026-f14.png"/>

      </fig>


</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e7096">The code used to reproduce results, including figures for this manuscript, is accessible in Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20509332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20509332</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="altparen.85"/>) and in the following GitHub repository <uri>https://github.com/EyringMLClimateGroup/galytska26acp_CausalInferenceForTropicalMiddleStratOzone</uri> (last access: 4 June 2026). The causal discovery algorithm is implemented in the Python package Tigramite is released under GNU General Public License v3.0. Tigramite v5 is publicly available on Zenodo: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7747255" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7747255</ext-link>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.86"/> or via <uri>https://github.com/jakobrunge/tigramite</uri> (last access: 2 June 2026). Transformed Eulerian mean data from the ERA5 reanalysis (monthly means) is available on Zenodo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.87"><named-content content-type="pre"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7081721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7081721</ext-link>,</named-content></xref>. MLS N<sub>2</sub>O v5.01 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.88"/> is publicly available <uri>https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri> (last access: 2 June 2026) upon registration. OSIRIS O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> data are available at <uri>https://research-groups.usask.ca/osiris/data-products.php#</uri> (last access: 2 June 2026). QBO equatorial winds are provided by the Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) and are publicly available on Zenodo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.89"><named-content content-type="pre"><ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18850668" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18850668</ext-link>,</named-content></xref>. Data from the TOMCAT CTM simulation is available upon request from the authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e7172">EG performed the analysis, prepared all figures, and led the writing of the manuscript. JR developed the causal discovery tool that supported this study. EG developed the code for data pre- and post-processing and implemented a causal inference workflow using JR's package and code from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.90"/>. MPC, SSD, and WF designed and performed the TOMCAT CTM simulation. All co-authors commented on the initial and revised drafts of the manuscripts and contributed to the interpretation of the results.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7181">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7187">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7193">This work used the computational resources of the Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum (DKRZ, Germany) granted by its Scientific Steering Committee (WLA) under project ID bd1083. The TOMCAT simulation was performed on the UK Archer2 HPC system. The authors thank Veronika Eyring for her comments on the study. The authors thank the Swedish National Space Agency and the Canadian Space Agency for the continued operation and support of Odin-OSIRIS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7198">This research was funded by the Central Research Development Fund at the University of Bremen (grant no. ZF04A/2023/FB1/Galytska Evgenia). Part of the funding for this study was provided by the European Research Council (ERC) Synergy Grant “Understanding and Modelling the Earth System with Machine Learning (USMILE)” under the Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant no. 855187), the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement 101003536 (ESM2025 – Earth System Models for the Future), and the “Advanced Earth System Model Evaluation for CMIP (EVal4CMIP)” project funded by the Helmholtz Society. Jakob Runge has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) Starting Grant CausalEarth under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant no. 948112). Martyn P. Chipperfield and Sandip S. Dhomse are supported by the NCEO TerraFIRMA, NERC LSO3 (NE/V011863/1) and ESA OREGANO (4000137112/22/I-AG) projects.The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the University of Bremen.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7209">This paper was edited by Jens-Uwe Grooß and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Abalos et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Abalos, M., Legras, B., Ploeger, F., and Randel, W. J.: Evaluating the advective Brewer-Dobson circulation in three reanalyses for the period 1979â€“2012, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7534–7554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023182" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023182</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Arosio et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Arosio, C., Rozanov, A., Malinina, E., Weber, M., and Burrows, J. P.: Merging of ozone profiles from SCIAMACHY, OMPS and SAGE II observations to study stratospheric ozone changes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2423–2444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2423-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-2423-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Arosio et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Arosio, C., Chipperfield, M. P., Rozanov, A., Weber, M., Dhomse, S., Feng, W., Jaross, G., Zhou, X., and Burrows, J. P.: Investigating Zonal Asymmetries in Stratospheric Ozone Trends From Satellite Limb Observations and a Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD040353, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD040353</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Baldwin et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Baldwin, M. P., Gray, L. J., Dunkerton, T. J., Hamilton, K., Haynes, P. H., Randel, W. J., Holton, J. R., Alexander, M. J., Hirota, I., Horinouchi, T., Jones, D. B. A., Kinnersley, J. S., Marquardt, C., Sato, K., and Takahashi, M.: The quasi-biennial oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 39, 179–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999RG000073</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Blyth(1972)</label><mixed-citation>Blyth, C. R.: On Simpson's Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle, J. Am. Stat. A., 67, 364–366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bognar et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Bognar, K., Tegtmeier, S., Bourassa, A., Roth, C., Warnock, T., Zawada, D., and Degenstein, D.: Stratospheric ozone trends for 1984–2021 in the SAGE II–OSIRIS–SAGE III/ISS composite dataset, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9553–9569, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9553-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-9553-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bourassa et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Bourassa, A. E., Roth, C. Z., Zawada, D. J., Rieger, L. A., McLinden, C. A., and Degenstein, D. A.: Drift-corrected Odin-OSIRIS ozone product: algorithm and updated stratospheric ozone trends, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 489–498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-489-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-489-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Brasseur and Solomon(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Brasseur, G. and Solomon, S.: Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere: Chemistry and Physics of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere, Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences Library, Springer Netherlands, ISBN 9781402038242, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Camps-Valls et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Camps-Valls, G., Gerhardus, A., Ninad, U., Varando, G., Martius, G., Balaguer-Ballester, E., Vinuesa, R., Diaz, E., Zanna, L., and Runge, J.: Discovering causal relations and equations from data, Phys. Rep., 1044, 1–68, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.10.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.physrep.2023.10.005</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Carvalho-Oliveira et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Carvalho-Oliveira, J., Di Capua, G., Borchert, L. F., Donner, R. V., and Baehr, J.: Causal relationships and predictability of the summer East Atlantic teleconnection, Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1561–1578, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1561-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/wcd-5-1561-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Chapman(1930)</label><mixed-citation>Chapman, S.: XXXV. On ozone and atomic oxygen in the upper atmosphere, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 10, 369–383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443009461588" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/14786443009461588</ext-link>, 1930.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Chipperfield(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Chipperfield, M. P.: New version of the TOMCAT/SLIMCAT off-line chemical transport model: Intercomparison of stratospheric tracer experiments, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 1179–1203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.51" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/qj.05.51</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Chipperfield and Gray(1992)</label><mixed-citation>Chipperfield, M. P. and Gray, L. J.: Two-dimensional model studies of the interannual variability of trace gases in the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 5963–5980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD00029</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chipperfield et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Chipperfield, M. P., Gray, L. J., Kinnersley, J. S., and Zawodny, J.: A Two-Dimensional Model Study of the QBO Signal in SAGE II NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 589–592, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/94GL00211</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Chipperfield et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Chipperfield, M. P., Liang, Q., Strahan, S. E., Morgenstern, O., Dhomse, S. S., Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Braesicke, P., Di Genova, G., Fleming, E. L., Hardiman, S. C., Iachetti, D., Jackman, C. H., Kinnison, D. E., Marchand, M., Pitari, G., Pyle, J. A., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., and Tummon, F.: Multimodel estimates of atmospheric lifetimes of long-lived ozone-depleting substances: Present and future, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2555–2573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021097" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013JD021097</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Chrysanthou et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Chrysanthou, A., Dubé, K., Tegtmeier, S., and Chipperfield, M. P.: Hemispheric Asymmetry in Stratospheric Trends of HCl and Ozone: Impact of Chemical Feedback on Ozone Recovery, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042161" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD042161</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Crutzen(1970)</label><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 96, 320–325, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709640815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49709640815</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Debeire et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Debeire, K., Bock, L., Nowack, P., Runge, J., and Eyring, V.: Constraining uncertainty in projected precipitation over land with causal discovery, Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 607–630, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-607-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-16-607-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Denzin(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Denzin, N. K.: The Fundamentals: Introducing Triangulation, <uri>https://www.shortcutstv.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Introducing-Triangulation.pdf</uri> (last access: 2 June 2026), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Dhomse et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Feng, W., Hossaini, R., Mann, G. W., and Santee, M. L.: Revisiting the hemispheric asymmetry in midlatitude ozone changes following the Mount Pinatubo eruption: A 3-D model study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3038–3047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015GL063052</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Dhomse et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Damadeo, R. P., Zawodny, J. M., Ball, W. T., Feng, W., Hossaini, R., Mann, G. W., and Haigh, J. D.: On the ambiguous nature of the 11-year solar cycle signal in upper stratospheric ozone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7241–7249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069958" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069958</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Docquier et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Docquier, D., Vannitsem, S., Ragone, F., Wyser, K., and Liang, X. S.: Causal Links Between Arctic Sea Ice and Its Potential Drivers Based on the Rate of Information Transfer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL095892, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL095892</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Dubé et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Dubé, K., Zawada, D., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D., Randel, W., Flittner, D., Sheese, P., and Walker, K.: An improved OSIRIS NO<sub>2</sub> profile retrieval in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere and intercomparison with ACE-FTS and SAGE III/ISS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6163–6180, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Dubé et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Dubé, K., Randel, W., Bourassa, A., Zawada, D., McLinden, C., and Degenstein, D.: Trends and Variability in Stratospheric NOx Derived From Merged SAGE II and OSIRIS Satellite Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031798, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031798</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Eckert et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Eckert, E., von Clarmann, T., Kiefer, M., Stiller, G. P., Lossow, S., Glatthor, N., Degenstein, D. A., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., McDermid, S., Pastel, M., Steinbrecht, W., Swart, D. P. J., Walker, K. A., and Bernath, P. F.: Drift-corrected trends and periodic variations in MIPAS IMK/IAA ozone measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2571–2589, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2571-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2571-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Eyring et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Eyring, V., Collins, W. D., Gentine, P., Barnes, E. A., Barreiro, M., Beucler, T., Bocquet, M., Bretherton, C. S., Christensen, H. M., Dagon, K., Gagne, D. J., Hall, D., Hammerling, D., Hoyer, S., Iglesias-Suarez, F., Lopez-Gomez, I., McGraw, M. C., Meehl, G. A., Molina, M. J., Monteleoni, C., Mueller, J., Pritchard, M.S., Rolnick, D., Runge, J., Stier, P., Watt-Meyer, O., Weigel, K., Yu, R., and Zanna, L.: Pushing the frontiers in climate modelling and analysis with machine learning, Nat. Clim. Change, 14, 916–928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02095-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-024-02095-y</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Fons et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Fons, E., Runge, J., Neubauer, D., and Lohmann, U.: Stratocumulus adjustments to aerosol perturbations disentangled with a causal approach, npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 6, 130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00452-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-023-00452-w</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Galytska(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Galytska, E.: Spatio-temporal variations of observed and modelled stratospheric trace gases, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Bremen, <uri>https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00107599-10</uri> (last access: 2 June 2026), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Galytska(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Galytska, E.: EyringMLClimateGroup/galytska26acp_CausalInferenceForTropicalMiddleStratOzone: Causal inference for quantifying chemical–dynamical pathways controlling tropical middle stratospheric ozone variability (v1.0), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20509332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.20509332</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Galytska et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Galytska, E., Rozanov, A., Chipperfield, M. P., Dhomse, Sandip. S., Weber, M., Arosio, C., Feng, W., and Burrows, J. P.: Dynamically controlled ozone decline in the tropical mid-stratosphere observed by SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 767–783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-767-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-767-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Galytska et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Galytska, E., Weigel, K., Handorf, D., Jaiser, R., Köhler, R., Runge, J., and Eyring, V.: Evaluating Causal Arctic-Midlatitude Teleconnections in CMIP6, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037978, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037978" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037978</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Gebhardt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Gebhardt, C., Rozanov, A., Hommel, R., Weber, M., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Degenstein, D., Froidevaux, L., and Thompson, A. M.: Stratospheric ozone trends and variability as seen by SCIAMACHY from 2002 to 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 831–846, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-831-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-831-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Gerhardus and Runge(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Gerhardus, A. and Runge, J.: High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated time series with latent confounders, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, edited by: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., and Lin, H., vol. 33,  12615–12625, Curran Associates, Inc., <uri>https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/94e70705efae423efda1088614128d0b-Paper.pdf</uri> (last access: 2 June 2026), 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Godin-Beekmann et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Godin-Beekmann, S., Azouz, N., Sofieva, V. F., Hubert, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Effertz, P., Ancellet, G., Degenstein, D. A., Zawada, D., Froidevaux, L., Frith, S., Wild, J., Davis, S., Steinbrecht, W., Leblanc, T., Querel, R., Tourpali, K., Damadeo, R., Maillard Barras, E., Stübi, R., Vigouroux, C., Arosio, C., Nedoluha, G., Boyd, I., Van Malderen, R., Mahieu, E., Smale, D., and Sussmann, R.: Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60° S–60° N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11657–11673, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11657-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-11657-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Hitchcock and Ming(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Hitchcock, P. and Ming, A.: The Role of Ozone in the Secondary Circulation of the QBO: Linear Theory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2025JD044766, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD044766" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2025JD044766</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Iglesias-Suarez et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Iglesias-Suarez, F., Wild, O., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Lamarque, J.-F., Ryan, E. M., Davis, S. M., Eichinger, R., Saiz-Lopez, A., and Young, P. J.: Tropical Stratospheric Circulation and Ozone Coupled to Pacific Multi-Decadal Variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL092162, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092162" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL092162</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Karmouche et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Karmouche, S., Galytska, E., Runge, J., Meehl, G. A., Phillips, A. S., Weigel, K., and Eyring, V.: Regime-oriented causal model evaluation of Atlantic–Pacific teleconnections in CMIP6, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 309–344, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-309-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/esd-14-309-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Kerzenmacher and Braesicke(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Kerzenmacher, T. and Braesicke, P.: QBO: monthly zonal stratospheric winds from tropical radiosonde data (mainly Singapore), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18472673" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18472673</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Kretschmer et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Kretschmer, M., Zappa, G., and Shepherd, T. G.: The role of Barents–Kara sea ice loss in projected polar vortex changes, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 715–730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Krich et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Krich, C., Runge, J., Miralles, D. G., Migliavacca, M., Perez-Priego, O., El-Madany, T., Carrara, A., and Mahecha, M. D.: Estimating causal networks in biosphere–atmosphere interaction with the PCMCI approach, Biogeosciences, 17, 1033–1061, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1033-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-17-1033-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Kyrölä et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Sofieva, V., Tamminen, J., Päivärinta, S.-M., Tukiainen, S., Zawodny, J., and Thomason, L.: Combined SAGE II–GOMOS ozone profile data set for 1984–2011 and trend analysis of the vertical distribution of ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10645–10658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Lambert et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Lambert, A., Livesey, N., Read, W., and Fuller, R.: MLS/Aura Level 3 Monthly Binned Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Mixing Ratio on Assorted Grids V005, <uri>https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/ML2N2O_003/summary</uri> (last access: 5 March 2025), <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA/3545" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA/3545</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Li et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Feng, W., Bian, J., Xia, Y., and Guo, D.: Quantifying stratospheric ozone trends over 1984–2020: a comparison of ordinary and regularized multivariate regression models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13029–13047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Llewellyn et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Llewellyn, E. J., Lloyd, N. D., Degenstein, D. A., Gattinger, R. L., Petelina, S. V., Bourassa, A. E., Wiensz, J. T., Ivanov, E. V., McDade, I. C., Solheim, B. H., McConnell, J. C., Haley, C. S., von Savigny, C., Sioris, C. E., McLinden, C. A., Griffioen, E., Kaminski, J., Evans, W. F., Puckrin, E., Strong, K., Wehrle, V., Hum, R. H., Kendall, D. J., Matsushita, J., Murtagh, D. P., Brohede, S., Stegman, J., Witt, G., Barnes, G., Payne, W. F., Piché, L., Smith, K., Warshaw, G., Deslauniers, D. L., Marchand, P., Richardson, E. H., King, R. A., Wevers, I., McCreath, W., Kyrölä, E., Oikarinen, L., Leppelmeier, G. W., Auvinen, H., Mégie, G., Hauchecorne, A., Lefèvre, F., de La Nöe, J., Ricaud, P., Frisk, U., Sjoberg, F., von Schéele, F., and Nordh, L.: The OSIRIS instrument on the Odin spacecraft, Can. J. Phys., 82, 411–422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/p04-005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/p04-005</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Match and Fueglistaler(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Match, A. and Fueglistaler, S.: Anomalous Dynamics of QBO Disruptions Explained by 1D Theory with External Triggering, J. Atmos. Sci., 78, 373–383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0172.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-20-0172.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Match et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Match, A., Gerber, E. P., and Fueglistaler, S.: Protection without poison: why tropical ozone maximizes in the interior of the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4349–4366, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4349-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-4349-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Ming et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Ming, A., Hitchcock, P., Orbe, C., and Dubé, K.: Phase and Amplitude Relationships Between Ozone, Temperature, and Circulation in the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042469" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD042469</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Minganti et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Minganti, D., Chabrillat, S., Christophe, Y., Errera, Q., Abalos, M., Prignon, M., Kinnison, D. E., and Mahieu, E.: Climatological impact of the Brewer–Dobson circulation on the N2O budget in WACCM, a chemical reanalysis and a CTM driven by four dynamical reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12609–12631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12609-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-12609-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Murtagh et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Murtagh, D., Frisk, U., Merino, F., Ridal, M., Jonsson, A., Stegman, J., Witt, G., Eriksson, P., Jiménez, C., Megie, G., Noë, J. D. L., Ricaud, P., Baron, P., Pardo, J. R., Hauchcorne, A., Llewellyn, E. J., Degenstein, D. A., Gattinger, R. L., Lloyd, N. D., Evans, W. F., McDade, I. C., Haley, C. S., Sioris, C., Savigny, C. v., Solheim, B. H., McConnell, J. C., Strong, K., Richardson, E. H., Leppelmeier, G. W., Kyrölä, E., Auvinen, H., and Oikarinen, L.: An overview of the Odin atmospheric mission, Can. J. Phys., 80, 309–319, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/p01-157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1139/p01-157</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Nedoluha et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Nedoluha, G. E., Siskind, D. E., Lambert, A., and Boone, C.: The decrease in mid-stratospheric tropical ozone since 1991, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4215–4224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4215-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4215-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Nowack et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Nowack, P., Runge, J., Eyring, V., and Haigh, J. D.: Causal networks for climate model evaluation and constrained projections, Nat. Commun., 11, 1–11, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15195-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-020-15195-y</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Orbe et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Orbe, C., Ming, A., Chiodo, G., Prather, M., Diallo, M., Tang, Q., Chrysanthou, A., Naoe, H., Zhou, X., Thaler, I., Elsbury, D., Bednarz, E., Wright, J. S., Match, A., Watanabe, S., Anstey, J., Kerzenmacher, T., Versick, S., Marchand, M., Li, F., and Keeble, J.: Experimental protocol for phase 1 of the APARC QUOCA (QUasibiennial oscillation and Ozone Chemistry interactions in the Atmosphere) working group, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 773–794, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-773-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-19-773-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Park et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Park, M., Randel, W. J., Kinnison, D. E., Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A., Roth, C. Z., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., Livesey, N. J., and Santee, M. L.: Variability of Stratospheric Reactive Nitrogen and Ozone Related to the QBO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 10103–10118, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD027061</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Petropavlovskikh et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Petropavlovskikh, I., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hubert, D., Damadeo, R., Hassler, B., and Sofieva, V.: SPARC/IO3C/GAW Report on Long-term Ozone Trends and Uncertainties in the Stratosphere, 9th assessment report of the SPARC project, published by the International Project Office at DLR-IPA. also: GAW Report No. 241; WCRP Report 17/2018, Tech. rep., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17874/f899e57a20b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.17874/f899e57a20b</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Polkova et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Polkova, I., Afargan-Gerstman, H., Domeisen, D. I. V., King, M. P., Ruggieri, P., Athanasiadis, P., Dobrynin, M., Aarnes, Ã., Kretschmer, M., and Baehr, J.: Predictors and prediction skill for marine cold-air outbreaks over the Barents Sea, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 2638–2656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4038" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.4038</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Portmann et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Portmann, R. W., Daniel, J. S., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Stratospheric ozone depletion due to nitrous oxide: influences of other gases, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 367, 1256–1264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2011.0377</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Prather et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J., Froidevaux, L., and Livesey, N. J.: Observed changes in stratospheric circulation: decreasing lifetime of N2O, 2005–2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 843–849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-843-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-843-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Ricard et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Ricard, L., Falasca, F., Runge, J., and Nenes, A.: network-based constraint to evaluate climate sensitivity, Nat. Commun., 15, 6942, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50813-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-50813-z</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Runge(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Runge, J.: Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasets, in: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), edited by: Peters, J. and Sontag, D., vol. 124 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research,  1388–1397, PMLR, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.03685" ext-link-type="DOI">10.48550/arXiv.2003.03685</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Runge et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Runge, J., Gillies, E., Strobl, E. V., and Palachy-Affek, S.: jakobrunge/tigramite: Tigramite 5.2, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7747255" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7747255</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Runge et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Runge, J., Petoukhov, V., and Kurths, J.: Quantifying the strength and delay of climatic interactions: The ambiguities of cross correlation and a novel measure based on graphical models, J. Climate, 27, 720–739, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00159.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00159.1</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Runge et al.(2019a)</label><mixed-citation>Runge, J., Bathiany, S., Bollt, E., Camps-Valls, G., Coumou, D., Deyle, E., Glymour, C., Kretschmer, M., Mahecha, M. D., Muñoz-Marí, J., van Nes, E. H., Peters, J., Quax, R., Reichstein, M., Scheffer, M., Schölkopf, B., Spirtes, P., Sugihara, G., Sun, J., Zhang, K., and Zscheischler, J.: Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences, Nat. Commun., 10, 2553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10105-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-019-10105-3</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Runge et al.(2019b)</label><mixed-citation>Runge, J., Nowack, P., Kretschmer, M., Flaxman, S., and Sejdinovic, D.: Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series datasets, Sci. Adv., 5, eaau4996, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4996" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aau4996</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Runge et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Runge, J., Gerhardus, A., Varando, G., Eyring, V., and Camps-Valls, G.: Causal inference for time series, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 4, 487–505, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00431-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43017-023-00431-y</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Serva(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Serva, F.: Transformed Eulerian mean data from the ERA5 reanalysis (monthly means) (0.1.1), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7081721" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.7081721</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Serva(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Serva, F.: Transformed Eulerian mean diagnostics (tem-diag), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10180386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.10180386</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Serva et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Serva, F., Christiansen, B., Davini, P., von Hardenberg, J., van den Oord, G., Reerink, T. J., Wyser, K., and Yang, S.: Changes in Stratospheric Dynamics Simulated by the EC-Earth Model From CMIP5 to CMIP6, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 16, e2023MS003756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003756" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023MS003756</ext-link>, e2023MS003756 2023MS003756, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Sofieva et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Sofieva, V. F., Szeląg, M., Tamminen, J., Kyrölä, E., Degenstein, D., Roth, C., Zawada, D., Rozanov, A., Arosio, C., Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Laeng, A., Stiller, G. P., von Clarmann, T., Froidevaux, L., Livesey, N., van Roozendael, M., and Retscher, C.: Measurement report: regional trends of stratospheric ozone evaluated using the MErged GRIdded Dataset of Ozone Profiles (MEGRIDOP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6707–6720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6707-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-6707-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Spirtes(1995)</label><mixed-citation> Spirtes, P.: Directed cyclic graphical representations of feedback models, in: Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI'95, 491–498, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, ISBN 1558603859, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Spirtes et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., Scheines, R., and Heckerman, D.: Causation, prediction, and search, MIT press, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Steinbrecht et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Steinbrecht, W., Froidevaux, L., Fuller, R., Wang, R., Anderson, J., Roth, C., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D., Damadeo, R., Zawodny, J., Frith, S., McPeters, R., Bhartia, P., Wild, J., Long, C., Davis, S., Rosenlof, K., Sofieva, V., Walker, K., Rahpoe, N., Rozanov, A., Weber, M., Laeng, A., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G., Kramarova, N., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., Querel, R., Swart, D., Boyd, I., Hocke, K., Kämpfer, N., Maillard Barras, E., Moreira, L., Nedoluha, G., Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Schneider, M., García, O., Jones, N., Mahieu, E., Smale, D., Kotkamp, M., Robinson, J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Harris, N., Hassler, B., Hubert, D., and Tummon, F.: An update on ozone profile trends for the period 2000 to 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10675–10690, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Szeląg et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Szeląg, M. E., Sofieva, V. F., Degenstein, D., Roth, C., Davis, S., and Froidevaux, L.: Seasonal stratospheric ozone trends over 2000–2018 derived from several merged data sets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7035–7047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7035-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-7035-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Tian et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Tian, W., Chipperfield, M. P., Gray, L. J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Quasi-biennial oscillation and tracer distributions in a coupled chemistry-climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006871" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006871</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Tibau et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Tibau, X.-A., Reimers, C., Gerhardus, A., Denzler, J., Eyring, V., and Runge, J.: A spatiotemporal stochastic climate model for benchmarking causal discovery methods for teleconnections, Environ. Data Sci., 1, e12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2022.11" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/eds.2022.11</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>Tweedy et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Tweedy, O. V., Kramarova, N. A., Strahan, S. E., Newman, P. A., Coy, L., Randel, W. J., Park, M., Waugh, D. W., and Frith, S. M.: Response of trace gases to the disrupted 2015–2016 quasi-biennial oscillation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6813–6823, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6813-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-6813-2017</ext-link>, 2017. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Uleman et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Uleman, J. F., Luijten, M., Abdo, W. F., Vyrastekova, J., Gerhardus, A., Runge, J., Rod, N. H., and Verhagen, M.: Triangulation for causal loop diagrams: constructing biopsychosocial models using group model building, literature review, and causal discovery, npj Complexity, 1, 19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44260-024-00017-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s44260-024-00017-9</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>WMO(2022)</label><mixed-citation> WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022, Tech. Rep. 278, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, ISBN 978-9914-733-97-6, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Wright(1921)</label><mixed-citation> Wright, S.: Correlation and causation, J. Agric. Res., 20, 557, 1921.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Zerefos et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Zerefos, C., Fountoulakis, I., Eleftheratos, K., and Kazantzidis, A.: Long-term variability of human health-related solar ultraviolet-B radiation doses from the 1980s to the end of the 21st century, Physiol. Rev., 103, 1789–1826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1152/physrev.00031.2022</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Causal inference for quantifying chemical–dynamical pathways controlling tropical middle stratospheric ozone variability</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Abalos et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abalos, M., Legras, B., Ploeger, F., and Randel, W. J.: Evaluating the
advective Brewer-Dobson circulation in three reanalyses for the period
1979â€“2012, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7534–7554,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023182" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023182</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Arosio et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arosio, C., Rozanov, A., Malinina, E., Weber, M., and Burrows, J. P.: Merging of ozone profiles from SCIAMACHY, OMPS and SAGE II observations to study stratospheric ozone changes, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2423–2444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2423-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2423-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Arosio et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Arosio, C., Chipperfield, M. P., Rozanov, A., Weber, M., Dhomse, S., Feng, W.,
Jaross, G., Zhou, X., and Burrows, J. P.: Investigating Zonal Asymmetries in
Stratospheric Ozone Trends From Satellite Limb Observations and a Chemical
Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129,
e2023JD040353, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040353</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Baldwin et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Baldwin, M. P., Gray, L. J., Dunkerton, T. J., Hamilton, K., Haynes, P. H.,
Randel, W. J., Holton, J. R., Alexander, M. J., Hirota, I., Horinouchi, T.,
Jones, D. B. A., Kinnersley, J. S., Marquardt, C., Sato, K., and Takahashi,
M.: The quasi-biennial oscillation, Rev. Geophys., 39, 179–229,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG000073</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Blyth(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blyth, C. R.: On Simpson's Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle, J.
Am. Stat. A., 67, 364–366,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10482387</a>, 1972.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bognar et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bognar, K., Tegtmeier, S., Bourassa, A., Roth, C., Warnock, T., Zawada, D., and Degenstein, D.: Stratospheric ozone trends for 1984–2021 in the SAGE II–OSIRIS–SAGE III/ISS composite dataset, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 9553–9569, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9553-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-9553-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bourassa et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bourassa, A. E., Roth, C. Z., Zawada, D. J., Rieger, L. A., McLinden, C. A., and Degenstein, D. A.: Drift-corrected Odin-OSIRIS ozone product: algorithm and updated stratospheric ozone trends, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 489–498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-489-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-489-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Brasseur and Solomon(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brasseur, G. and Solomon, S.: Aeronomy of the Middle Atmosphere: Chemistry and
Physics of the Stratosphere and Mesosphere, Atmospheric and Oceanographic
Sciences Library, Springer Netherlands, ISBN 9781402038242, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Camps-Valls et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Camps-Valls, G., Gerhardus, A., Ninad, U., Varando, G., Martius, G.,
Balaguer-Ballester, E., Vinuesa, R., Diaz, E., Zanna, L., and Runge, J.:
Discovering causal relations and equations from data, Phys. Rep., 1044,
1–68, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.10.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2023.10.005</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Carvalho-Oliveira et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Carvalho-Oliveira, J., Di Capua, G., Borchert, L. F., Donner, R. V., and Baehr, J.: Causal relationships and predictability of the summer East Atlantic teleconnection, Weather Clim. Dynam., 5, 1561–1578, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1561-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-5-1561-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Chapman(1930)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chapman, S.: XXXV. On ozone and atomic oxygen in the upper atmosphere, The
London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science,
10, 369–383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443009461588" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/14786443009461588</a>, 1930.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Chipperfield(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chipperfield, M. P.: New version of the TOMCAT/SLIMCAT off-line chemical
transport model: Intercomparison of stratospheric tracer experiments,
Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 1179–1203,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.51" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.05.51</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Chipperfield and Gray(1992)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chipperfield, M. P. and Gray, L. J.: Two-dimensional model studies of the
interannual variability of trace gases in the middle atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 5963–5980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00029</a>,
1992.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chipperfield et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chipperfield, M. P., Gray, L. J., Kinnersley, J. S., and Zawodny, J.: A
Two-Dimensional Model Study of the QBO Signal in SAGE II NO<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>3</sub>,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 589–592, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/94GL00211</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Chipperfield et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chipperfield, M. P., Liang, Q., Strahan, S. E., Morgenstern, O., Dhomse, S. S.,
Abraham, N. L., Archibald, A. T., Bekki, S., Braesicke, P., Di Genova, G.,
Fleming, E. L., Hardiman, S. C., Iachetti, D., Jackman, C. H., Kinnison,
D. E., Marchand, M., Pitari, G., Pyle, J. A., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., and
Tummon, F.: Multimodel estimates of atmospheric lifetimes of long-lived
ozone-depleting substances: Present and future, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 2555–2573, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021097" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021097</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Chrysanthou et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chrysanthou, A., Dubé, K., Tegtmeier, S., and Chipperfield, M. P.: Hemispheric
Asymmetry in Stratospheric Trends of HCl and Ozone: Impact of Chemical
Feedback on Ozone Recovery, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
130, e2024JD042161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042161" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042161</a>,
2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Crutzen(1970)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Crutzen, P. J.: The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone
content, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 96, 320–325,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709640815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709640815</a>, 1970.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Debeire et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Debeire, K., Bock, L., Nowack, P., Runge, J., and Eyring, V.: Constraining uncertainty in projected precipitation over land with causal discovery, Earth Syst. Dynam., 16, 607–630, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-607-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-16-607-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Denzin(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Denzin, N. K.: The Fundamentals: Introducing Triangulation,
<a href="https://www.shortcutstv.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Introducing-Triangulation.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 June 2026),
2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Dhomse et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Feng, W., Hossaini, R., Mann, G. W., and
Santee, M. L.: Revisiting the hemispheric asymmetry in midlatitude ozone
changes following the Mount Pinatubo eruption: A 3-D model study, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 3038–3047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063052</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Dhomse et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Damadeo, R. P., Zawodny, J. M., Ball,
W. T., Feng, W., Hossaini, R., Mann, G. W., and Haigh, J. D.: On the
ambiguous nature of the 11-year solar cycle signal in upper stratospheric
ozone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 7241–7249,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069958" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069958</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Docquier et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Docquier, D., Vannitsem, S., Ragone, F., Wyser, K., and Liang, X. S.: Causal
Links Between Arctic Sea Ice and Its Potential Drivers Based on the Rate of
Information Transfer, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2021GL095892,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL095892</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Dubé et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dubé, K., Zawada, D., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D., Randel, W., Flittner, D., Sheese, P., and Walker, K.: An improved OSIRIS NO<sub>2</sub> profile retrieval in the upper troposphere–lower stratosphere and intercomparison with ACE-FTS and SAGE III/ISS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 6163–6180, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-6163-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Dubé et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dubé, K., Randel, W., Bourassa, A., Zawada, D., McLinden, C., and Degenstein,
D.: Trends and Variability in Stratospheric NOx Derived From Merged SAGE II
and OSIRIS Satellite Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031798, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031798" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031798</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Eckert et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eckert, E., von Clarmann, T., Kiefer, M., Stiller, G. P., Lossow, S., Glatthor, N., Degenstein, D. A., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., McDermid, S., Pastel, M., Steinbrecht, W., Swart, D. P. J., Walker, K. A., and Bernath, P. F.: Drift-corrected trends and periodic variations in MIPAS IMK/IAA ozone measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2571–2589, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2571-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2571-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Eyring et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Eyring, V., Collins, W. D., Gentine, P., Barnes, E. A., Barreiro, M., Beucler, T., Bocquet, M., Bretherton, C. S., Christensen, H. M., Dagon, K., Gagne, D. J., Hall, D., Hammerling, D., Hoyer, S., Iglesias-Suarez, F., Lopez-Gomez, I., McGraw, M. C., Meehl, G. A., Molina, M. J., Monteleoni, C., Mueller, J., Pritchard, M.S., Rolnick, D., Runge, J., Stier, P., Watt-Meyer, O., Weigel, K., Yu, R., and Zanna, L.: Pushing the frontiers in climate modelling and analysis with machine learning, Nat. Clim. Change, 14, 916–928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02095-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02095-y</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Fons et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fons, E., Runge, J., Neubauer, D., and Lohmann, U.: Stratocumulus adjustments
to aerosol perturbations disentangled with a causal approach, npj Climate and
Atmospheric Science, 6, 130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00452-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-023-00452-w</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Galytska(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galytska, E.: Spatio-temporal variations of observed and modelled stratospheric
trace gases, Ph.D. thesis, Universität Bremen,
<a href="https://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:gbv:46-00107599-10" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 June 2026), 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Galytska(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galytska, E.: EyringMLClimateGroup/galytska26acp_CausalInferenceForTropicalMiddleStratOzone: Causal inference for quantifying chemical–dynamical pathways controlling tropical middle stratospheric ozone variability (v1.0), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20509332" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20509332</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Galytska et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galytska, E., Rozanov, A., Chipperfield, M. P., Dhomse, Sandip. S., Weber, M., Arosio, C., Feng, W., and Burrows, J. P.: Dynamically controlled ozone decline in the tropical mid-stratosphere observed by SCIAMACHY, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 767–783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-767-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-767-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Galytska et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galytska, E., Weigel, K., Handorf, D., Jaiser, R., Köhler, R., Runge, J., and
Eyring, V.: Evaluating Causal Arctic-Midlatitude Teleconnections in CMIP6,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037978,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037978" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037978</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Gebhardt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gebhardt, C., Rozanov, A., Hommel, R., Weber, M., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Degenstein, D., Froidevaux, L., and Thompson, A. M.: Stratospheric ozone trends and variability as seen by SCIAMACHY from 2002 to 2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 831–846, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-831-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-831-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Gerhardus and Runge(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerhardus, A. and Runge, J.: High-recall causal discovery for autocorrelated
time series with latent confounders, in: Advances in Neural Information
Processing Systems, edited by: Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R.,
Balcan, M., and Lin, H., vol. 33,  12615–12625, Curran Associates,
Inc.,
<a href="https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/94e70705efae423efda1088614128d0b-Paper.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 June 2026),
2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Godin-Beekmann et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Godin-Beekmann, S., Azouz, N., Sofieva, V. F., Hubert, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Effertz, P., Ancellet, G., Degenstein, D. A., Zawada, D., Froidevaux, L., Frith, S., Wild, J., Davis, S., Steinbrecht, W., Leblanc, T., Querel, R., Tourpali, K., Damadeo, R., Maillard Barras, E., Stübi, R., Vigouroux, C., Arosio, C., Nedoluha, G., Boyd, I., Van Malderen, R., Mahieu, E., Smale, D., and Sussmann, R.: Updated trends of the stratospheric ozone vertical distribution in the 60°&thinsp;S–60°&thinsp;N latitude range based on the LOTUS regression model , Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11657–11673, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11657-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11657-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Hersbach et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons,
A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati,
G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M.,
Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global
reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146,
1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hitchcock and Ming(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hitchcock, P. and Ming, A.: The Role of Ozone in the Secondary Circulation of
the QBO: Linear Theory, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130,
e2025JD044766, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD044766" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JD044766</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Iglesias-Suarez et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Iglesias-Suarez, F., Wild, O., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., Marsh, D. R.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Ryan, E. M., Davis, S. M., Eichinger, R., Saiz-Lopez, A.,
and Young, P. J.: Tropical Stratospheric Circulation and Ozone Coupled to
Pacific Multi-Decadal Variability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2020GL092162, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092162" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL092162</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Karmouche et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karmouche, S., Galytska, E., Runge, J., Meehl, G. A., Phillips, A. S., Weigel, K., and Eyring, V.: Regime-oriented causal model evaluation of Atlantic–Pacific teleconnections in CMIP6, Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 309–344, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-309-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-309-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Kerzenmacher and Braesicke(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kerzenmacher, T. and Braesicke, P.: QBO: monthly zonal stratospheric winds from
tropical radiosonde data (mainly Singapore), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18472673" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18472673</a>,
2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Kretschmer et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kretschmer, M., Zappa, G., and Shepherd, T. G.: The role of Barents–Kara sea ice loss in projected polar vortex changes, Weather Clim. Dynam., 1, 715–730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-1-715-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Krich et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Krich, C., Runge, J., Miralles, D. G., Migliavacca, M., Perez-Priego, O., El-Madany, T., Carrara, A., and Mahecha, M. D.: Estimating causal networks in biosphere–atmosphere interaction with the PCMCI approach, Biogeosciences, 17, 1033–1061, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1033-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-1033-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Kyrölä et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Sofieva, V., Tamminen, J., Päivärinta, S.-M., Tukiainen, S., Zawodny, J., and Thomason, L.: Combined SAGE II–GOMOS ozone profile data set for 1984–2011 and trend analysis of the vertical distribution of ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10645–10658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Lambert et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lambert, A., Livesey, N., Read, W., and Fuller, R.: MLS/Aura Level 3 Monthly
Binned Nitrous Oxide (N2O) Mixing Ratio on Assorted Grids V005,
<a href="https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets/ML2N2O_003/summary" target="_blank"/> (last access: 5 March 2025),
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA/3545" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/Aura/MLS/DATA/3545</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Li et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, Y., Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Feng, W., Bian, J., Xia, Y., and Guo, D.: Quantifying stratospheric ozone trends over 1984–2020: a comparison of ordinary and regularized multivariate regression models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13029–13047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13029-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Llewellyn et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Llewellyn, E. J., Lloyd, N. D., Degenstein, D. A., Gattinger, R. L., Petelina,
S. V., Bourassa, A. E., Wiensz, J. T., Ivanov, E. V., McDade, I. C., Solheim,
B. H., McConnell, J. C., Haley, C. S., von Savigny, C., Sioris, C. E.,
McLinden, C. A., Griffioen, E., Kaminski, J., Evans, W. F., Puckrin, E.,
Strong, K., Wehrle, V., Hum, R. H., Kendall, D. J., Matsushita, J., Murtagh,
D. P., Brohede, S., Stegman, J., Witt, G., Barnes, G., Payne, W. F., Piché,
L., Smith, K., Warshaw, G., Deslauniers, D. L., Marchand, P., Richardson,
E. H., King, R. A., Wevers, I., McCreath, W., Kyrölä, E., Oikarinen, L.,
Leppelmeier, G. W., Auvinen, H., Mégie, G., Hauchecorne, A., Lefèvre, F.,
de La Nöe, J., Ricaud, P., Frisk, U., Sjoberg, F., von Schéele, F., and
Nordh, L.: The OSIRIS instrument on the Odin spacecraft, Can. J.
Phys., 82, 411–422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/p04-005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/p04-005</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Match and Fueglistaler(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Match, A. and Fueglistaler, S.: Anomalous Dynamics of QBO Disruptions Explained
by 1D Theory with External Triggering, J. Atmos. Sci.,
78, 373–383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0172.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-20-0172.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Match et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Match, A., Gerber, E. P., and Fueglistaler, S.: Protection without poison: why tropical ozone maximizes in the interior of the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 4349–4366, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4349-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-4349-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Ming et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ming, A., Hitchcock, P., Orbe, C., and Dubé, K.: Phase and Amplitude
Relationships Between Ozone, Temperature, and Circulation in the
Quasi-Biennial Oscillation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
130, e2024JD042469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042469" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042469</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Minganti et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Minganti, D., Chabrillat, S., Christophe, Y., Errera, Q., Abalos, M., Prignon, M., Kinnison, D. E., and Mahieu, E.: Climatological impact of the Brewer–Dobson circulation on the N2O budget in WACCM, a chemical reanalysis and a CTM driven by four dynamical reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 12609–12631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12609-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12609-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Murtagh et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Murtagh, D., Frisk, U., Merino, F., Ridal, M., Jonsson, A., Stegman, J., Witt,
G., Eriksson, P., Jiménez, C., Megie, G., Noë, J. D. L., Ricaud, P., Baron,
P., Pardo, J. R., Hauchcorne, A., Llewellyn, E. J., Degenstein, D. A.,
Gattinger, R. L., Lloyd, N. D., Evans, W. F., McDade, I. C., Haley, C. S.,
Sioris, C., Savigny, C. v., Solheim, B. H., McConnell, J. C., Strong, K.,
Richardson, E. H., Leppelmeier, G. W., Kyrölä, E., Auvinen, H., and
Oikarinen, L.: An overview of the Odin atmospheric mission, Can. J. Phys., 80, 309–319, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1139/p01-157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1139/p01-157</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Nedoluha et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nedoluha, G. E., Siskind, D. E., Lambert, A., and Boone, C.: The decrease in mid-stratospheric tropical ozone since 1991, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4215–4224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4215-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4215-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Nowack et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nowack, P., Runge, J., Eyring, V., and Haigh, J. D.: Causal networks for
climate model evaluation and constrained projections, Nat. Commun.,
11, 1–11, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15195-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15195-y</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Orbe et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Orbe, C., Ming, A., Chiodo, G., Prather, M., Diallo, M., Tang, Q., Chrysanthou, A., Naoe, H., Zhou, X., Thaler, I., Elsbury, D., Bednarz, E., Wright, J. S., Match, A., Watanabe, S., Anstey, J., Kerzenmacher, T., Versick, S., Marchand, M., Li, F., and Keeble, J.: Experimental protocol for phase 1 of the APARC QUOCA (QUasibiennial oscillation and Ozone Chemistry interactions in the Atmosphere) working group, Geosci. Model Dev., 19, 773–794, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-773-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-19-773-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Park et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Park, M., Randel, W. J., Kinnison, D. E., Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A.,
Roth, C. Z., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., Livesey, N. J., and Santee,
M. L.: Variability of Stratospheric Reactive Nitrogen and Ozone Related to
the QBO, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 10103–10118,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027061</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Petropavlovskikh et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petropavlovskikh, I., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hubert, D., Damadeo, R., Hassler, B.,
and Sofieva, V.: SPARC/IO3C/GAW Report on Long-term Ozone Trends and
Uncertainties in the Stratosphere,
9th assessment report of the SPARC project, published by the International
Project Office at DLR-IPA. also: GAW Report No. 241; WCRP Report 17/2018, Tech. rep., <a href="https://doi.org/10.17874/f899e57a20b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.17874/f899e57a20b</a>,
2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Polkova et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Polkova, I., Afargan-Gerstman, H., Domeisen, D. I. V., King, M. P., Ruggieri,
P., Athanasiadis, P., Dobrynin, M., Aarnes, Ã., Kretschmer, M., and Baehr,
J.: Predictors and prediction skill for marine cold-air outbreaks over the
Barents Sea, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147,
2638–2656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4038" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4038</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Portmann et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Portmann, R. W., Daniel, J. S., and Ravishankara, A. R.: Stratospheric ozone
depletion due to nitrous oxide: influences of other gases, Philos.
T. R. Soc. B, 367, 1256–1264,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0377" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0377</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Prather et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prather, M. J., Froidevaux, L., and Livesey, N. J.: Observed changes in stratospheric circulation: decreasing lifetime of N2O, 2005–2021, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 843–849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-843-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-843-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Ricard et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ricard, L., Falasca, F., Runge, J., and Nenes, A.: network-based constraint to
evaluate climate sensitivity, Nat. Commun., 15, 6942,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50813-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50813-z</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Runge(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Runge, J.: Discovering contemporaneous and lagged causal relations in
autocorrelated nonlinear time series datasets, in: Proceedings of the 36th
Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI), edited by: Peters,
J. and Sontag, D., vol. 124 of Proceedings of Machine Learning
Research,  1388–1397, PMLR, <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.03685" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2003.03685</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Runge et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Runge, J., Gillies, E., Strobl, E. V., and Palachy-Affek, S.: jakobrunge/tigramite: Tigramite 5.2, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7747255" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7747255</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Runge et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Runge, J., Petoukhov, V., and Kurths, J.: Quantifying the strength and delay of
climatic interactions: The ambiguities of cross correlation and a novel
measure based on graphical models, J. Climate, 27, 720–739,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00159.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00159.1</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Runge et al.(2019a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Runge, J., Bathiany, S., Bollt, E., Camps-Valls, G., Coumou, D., Deyle, E., Glymour, C., Kretschmer, M., Mahecha, M. D.,
Muñoz-Marí, J., van Nes, E. H., Peters, J., Quax, R., Reichstein, M., Scheffer, M., Schölkopf, B., Spirtes, P., Sugihara, G., Sun, J., Zhang, K., and Zscheischler, J.: Inferring causation from time series in Earth system sciences, Nat. Commun., 10, 2553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10105-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10105-3</a>, 2019a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Runge et al.(2019b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Runge, J., Nowack, P., Kretschmer, M., Flaxman, S., and Sejdinovic, D.:
Detecting and quantifying causal associations in large nonlinear time series
datasets, Sci. Adv., 5, eaau4996, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4996" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4996</a>,
2019b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Runge et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Runge, J., Gerhardus, A., Varando, G., Eyring, V., and Camps-Valls, G.: Causal
inference for time series, Nat. Rev. Earth Environ., 4, 487–505,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00431-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00431-y</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Serva(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Serva, F.: Transformed Eulerian mean data from the ERA5 reanalysis (monthly means) (0.1.1), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7081721" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7081721</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Serva(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Serva, F.: Transformed Eulerian mean diagnostics (tem-diag), Zenodo [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10180386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10180386</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Serva et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Serva, F., Christiansen, B., Davini, P., von Hardenberg, J., van den Oord, G.,
Reerink, T. J., Wyser, K., and Yang, S.: Changes in Stratospheric Dynamics
Simulated by the EC-Earth Model From CMIP5 to CMIP6, J. Adv.
Model. Earth Sy., 16, e2023MS003756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003756" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023MS003756</a>,
e2023MS003756 2023MS003756, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Sofieva et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sofieva, V. F., Szeląg, M., Tamminen, J., Kyrölä, E., Degenstein, D., Roth, C., Zawada, D., Rozanov, A., Arosio, C., Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Laeng, A., Stiller, G. P., von Clarmann, T., Froidevaux, L., Livesey, N., van Roozendael, M., and Retscher, C.: Measurement report: regional trends of stratospheric ozone evaluated using the MErged GRIdded Dataset of Ozone Profiles (MEGRIDOP), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6707–6720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6707-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6707-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Spirtes(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spirtes, P.: Directed cyclic graphical representations of feedback models, in:
Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial
Intelligence, UAI'95, 491–498, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San
Francisco, CA, USA, ISBN 1558603859, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Spirtes et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C. N., Scheines, R., and Heckerman, D.: Causation,
prediction, and search, MIT press, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Steinbrecht et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Steinbrecht, W., Froidevaux, L., Fuller, R., Wang, R., Anderson, J., Roth, C., Bourassa, A., Degenstein, D., Damadeo, R., Zawodny, J., Frith, S., McPeters, R., Bhartia, P., Wild, J., Long, C., Davis, S., Rosenlof, K., Sofieva, V., Walker, K., Rahpoe, N., Rozanov, A., Weber, M., Laeng, A., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G., Kramarova, N., Godin-Beekmann, S., Leblanc, T., Querel, R., Swart, D., Boyd, I., Hocke, K., Kämpfer, N., Maillard Barras, E., Moreira, L., Nedoluha, G., Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Schneider, M., García, O., Jones, N., Mahieu, E., Smale, D., Kotkamp, M., Robinson, J., Petropavlovskikh, I., Harris, N., Hassler, B., Hubert, D., and Tummon, F.: An update on ozone profile trends for the period 2000 to 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10675–10690, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10675-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Szeląg et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Szeląg, M. E., Sofieva, V. F., Degenstein, D., Roth, C., Davis, S., and Froidevaux, L.: Seasonal stratospheric ozone trends over 2000–2018 derived from several merged data sets, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7035–7047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7035-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7035-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Tian et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tian, W., Chipperfield, M. P., Gray, L. J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Quasi-biennial
oscillation and tracer distributions in a coupled chemistry-climate model,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D20301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006871" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006871</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Tibau et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tibau, X.-A., Reimers, C., Gerhardus, A., Denzler, J., Eyring, V., and Runge,
J.: A spatiotemporal stochastic climate model for benchmarking causal
discovery methods for teleconnections, Environ. Data Sci., 1, e12,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2022.11" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/eds.2022.11</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Tweedy et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tweedy, O. V., Kramarova, N. A., Strahan, S. E., Newman, P. A., Coy, L., Randel, W. J., Park, M., Waugh, D. W., and Frith, S. M.: Response of trace gases to the disrupted 2015–2016 quasi-biennial oscillation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6813–6823, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6813-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6813-2017</a>, 2017.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Uleman et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Uleman, J. F., Luijten, M., Abdo, W. F., Vyrastekova, J., Gerhardus, A., Runge,
J., Rod, N. H., and Verhagen, M.: Triangulation for causal loop diagrams:
constructing biopsychosocial models using group model building, literature
review, and causal discovery, npj Complexity, 1, 19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44260-024-00017-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44260-024-00017-9</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>WMO(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022, Tech. Rep. 278, World
Meteorological Organization, Geneva, ISBN 978-9914-733-97-6, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Wright(1921)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wright, S.: Correlation and causation, J. Agric. Res., 20,
557, 1921.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Zerefos et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zerefos, C., Fountoulakis, I., Eleftheratos, K., and Kazantzidis, A.: Long-term
variability of human health-related solar ultraviolet-B radiation doses from
the 1980s to the end of the 21st century, Physiol. Rev., 103,
1789–1826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2022</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
