<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-6541-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Measurement report: Optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols modulated by source variations of spring haze</article-title><alt-title>Optical properties of BC and BrC modulated by aerosol sources</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>Yuan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2077-5335</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Jiu-meng</given-names></name>
          <email>jiumengliu@hit.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7238-593X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>Xu-bing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Yang-mei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>Ying-jie</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Zhi-qing</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Ke-bin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Urban-rural Water Resource and Environment, School of Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Regional Environment and Sustainability, School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jiu-meng Liu (jiumengliu@hit.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>9</issue>
      <fpage>6541</fpage><lpage>6556</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>9</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>29</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Yuan Cheng et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e146">Carbonaceous aerosols exert unique impacts on earth energy balance, but are not well constrained in air quality and climate models yet. In this study, a field campaign was conducted in a Chinese megacity during a spring season to explore the optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols modulated by dramatic variations of particulate matter sources. We first integrated the light absorption results derived from different methods, including both on-line and off-line approaches. Then by synthesizing a series of source-relevant signatures, three types of haze episodes were identified. In general, agricultural fire emissions exerted strong influences on brown carbon (BrC), by effectively increasing the mass absorption efficiency (MAE) of bulk BrC, and emitting chromophores with a characteristic absorption peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 365 nm. Specifically, fires with low combustion efficiencies were more capable of enhancing the impacts of BrC on bulk aerosol absorption, and were more favorable for the emissions of organic compounds with relatively high molecular weights and aromatic contents. In addition, the agricultural fires, especially those with relatively low efficiencies, resulted in overestimations of black carbon (BC) mass by thermal-optical method due to unique emitted species. BC concentrations were also overestimated for the dust episodes. By excluding the impacts from agricultural fires and dusts, we unfolded the influence of secondary aerosol formation on the MAE of BC (MAE<sub>BC</sub>). With the enhancement of secondary aerosols, MAE<sub>BC</sub> was found to exhibit a clear increasing trend, which could be translated into the light absorption enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) factors of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42222706</award-id>
<award-id>22188102</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province</funding-source>
<award-id>YQ2024D011</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e201">Carbonaceous aerosols, which consist of organic compounds and black carbon (BC), exert unique impacts on earth energy balance (Bond et al., 2013), e.g., through absorbing and scattering solar radiation, influencing cloud processes, and deposition on ice and snow cover. However, as a complex mixture of compounds with continuing changes in chemical and physical properties (Pöschl, 2005; Andreae and Gelencsér, 2006), carbonaceous aerosols remained poorly constrained in air quality and climate models. For example, challenges still existed in the simulation of the sources, abundances, optical properties and radiative forcing of BC (Samset et al., 2014; Winiger et al., 2019; Gao et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2025; Wang et al., 2025). Similarly, discrepancies in the modeled and observed results were also evident for organic aerosol (OA), e.g., as indicated by the difficulties in proper predictions of several key fractions including primary OA emitted by open burning (Zhong et al., 2023), secondary OA (SOA) formed by volatility organic compounds (VOCs) with relatively low saturation vapor concentrations (Chang et al., 2022), and light absorbing OA, i.e., brown carbon (Tuccella et al., 2025). On one hand, state-of-the-art models were subject to various uncertainties such as those associated with the emission inventories, the treatments of BC lifetime and mixing state, the formation pathways of SOA, and the parameterization of brown carbon. On the other hand, there were also uncertainties in the observational results of carbonaceous aerosols. For example, measured BC were frequently found to differ by several times among various detection approaches such as the thermal-optical (e.g., carbon analyzer), light absorption (e.g., Aethalometer) and laser-induced incandescence (e.g., single-particle soot photometer) ones (Tinorua et al., 2024). These techniques are mainly based on the high thermal-stability, strong light-absorbing, and refractory properties of black carbon, respectively, while none of them has been established as a reference method (Petzold et al., 2013). In addition, it was commonly believed that inter-method differences in BC results were closely related to aerosol sources, but the influencing factors at play were not well understood (Pileci et al., 2021). Thus, largely constrained by the multitude of measurement principles, it remained challenging to integrate the observational and the subsequent interpretation (e.g., source apportionment) results on carbonaceous aerosols across studies and regions (Putaud et al., 2025).</p>
      <p id="d2e204">In China, the ambient fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) pollution has been reduced substantially since 2013 (Geng et al., 2024). More recently, the Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) of China released stricter Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM<sub>2.5</sub> (MEE, 2026), e.g., starting from 2031, the Class 2 standards will be reduced to 25 from 35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>  for annual average (with an interim limit of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> for 2026–2030) and to 50 from 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> for 24 h average (with an interim limit of 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>). The new standards provide additional impetus for air quality improvement and meanwhile place great demands on a stronger observational support for PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution control. This is particularly the case for Northeast China, which was overlooked by all of the national-level action plans implemented during 2013–2025 and showed relatively slow decreasing rate of PM<sub>2.5</sub> (Xiao et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e325">Northeast China comprises three provinces (i.e., Liaoning, Jilin and Heilongjiang) and involves two national-level city clusters, i.e., Harbin-Changchun (HC) and Central-Southern Liaoning. Among the two city-cluster regions, HC differs more significantly from the traditional hotspots for air pollution control, e.g., Beijing and the surrounding areas. The distinctiveness of HC could be seen from two aspects (Cheng and He, 2026). First, HC is located in a severe cold climate region (e.g., with a seasonal average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C in Harbin's winter), leading to intensive energy use in the cold winters for heating and thus high emissions of anthropogenic pollutants. Second, HC is within a major agricultural region, where open burning of crop residues remains prevalent after autumn harvesting and before spring planting in the next year. The agricultural fires frequently resulted in heavy pollution episodes, e.g., with record-high PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup> (1 h average) in Harbin (Cheng et al., 2021). Despite the distinct emission system, the aerosols in HC (e.g., regarding their chemical compositions, source contributions, optical properties and impacts) have not been comprehensively explored, as indicated by the limited number of studies available (e.g., Wu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Xie et al., 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e374">By combining on-line and off-line measurements, a field campaign was conducted in the central city of HC during a period with dramatic variations of aerosol sources and compositions. From a technical perspective, we elucidated the inter-method discrepancies in light absorption coefficients of carbonaceous aerosols, including both black and brown carbon. From a scientific perspective, we highlighted the signatures of various types of episodes and unfolded the responses of aerosol optical properties to agricultural fire emissions and secondary aerosol formation. We also demonstrated that nocturnal nitrate formation could be effectively enhanced by agricultural fires, and thermal-optical measurement of BC mass could be subject to substantial artifacts during specific episodes. This study provided insights into the links between optical and chemical properties of aerosols in Northeast China, which are essential for understanding the haze pollution in this distinct but largely unexplored region.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>On-line observations</title>
      <p id="d2e392">Aerosol optical properties and mass concentrations of gaseous pollutants were measured with high time resolutions for about one month (from 1 April to 2 May  2023) in Harbin. The observation was performed on the campus of Harbin Institute of Technology (HIT), an urban site surrounded by residential and commercial areas. For aerosol measurements, ambient air was drawn into a stainless-steel sampling line at a flow rate of 16.7 L min<sup>−1</sup>, using a vacuum pump (VACUUBRAND, Wertheim, Germany) and a mass flow controller (Alicat Scientific Inc., AZ, USA). After passing through a PM<sub>2.5</sub> cyclone (URG-2000-30EH; URG Corp., NC, USA) and a Nafion dryer (MD-700; Perma Pure LLC, NJ, USA), the sampled aerosols were measured by a photoacoustic extinctiometer (PAX; Droplet Measurement Technologies LLC, CO, USA) and a dual-spot Aethalometer (AE33; Aerosol d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia). The PAX was operated at a wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 870 nm based on in-situ measurement approaches, i.e., photoacoustic method for the light absorption coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a wide-angle integrating reciprocal nephelometer for the scattering coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The single scattering albedo (SSA) was calculated as the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to extinction coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ext</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the sum of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">scat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). While the in-situ approach of PAX was used as the reference method for light absorption measurements, the AE33, which was operated with M8060 filter tapes, provided aerosol absorption coefficients at seven wavelengths (i.e., 370, 470, 520, 590, 660, 880 and 950 nm). It has been widely acknowledged that filter-based absorption measurement could be biased by the loading effect and the multiple scattering effect (Weingartner et al., 2003; Collaud Coen et al., 2010). For AE33, the former had been accounted for by a compensation algorithm based on absorption measurements from two differently loaded filter spots (Drinovec et al., 2015), while the latter was typically corrected using an empirical parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The manufacture recommended a constant of 1.39 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the experimentally determined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values were frequently found to deviate considerably from the suggested value, with tempo-spatial variations and dependences on aerosol properties (Ferrero et al., 2021; Yus-Díez et al., 2021, 2025; Renzi et al., 2026). In this study, the default multiple scattering correction (assuming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was not applied and the corresponding absorption coefficients, which had only been corrected for the loading effect, will be specified as (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Refer to Supplement for a more detailed description of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The aerosol absorption Ångström exponent (AAE<sub>bulk</sub>) was determined as the slope derived from the linear regression of ln[(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] against ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), over the wavelength range of 370–880 nm.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e591">Time series of <bold>(a)</bold> the PAX-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 870 nm and the AE33-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 880 nm, <bold>(b)</bold> the PAX-based SSA and the AE33-based AAE<sub>bulk</sub>, <bold>(c)</bold> NO<sub>2</sub> and CO, and <bold>(d)</bold> ozone. The results were shown with a time resolution of 1 min.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e658">For the measurement of gaseous pollutants, ambient air was filtered and then drawn into a PTFE sampling line. A non-dispersive infrared analyzer (XHCO2000B) was used to measure carbon monoxide (CO), and two chemiluminescence-based analyzers (XHOZ7000 and XHN2000B) were operated to determine ozone (O<sub>3</sub>) and nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>), respectively. The instruments were manufactured by Hebei Sailhero Inc. (Shijiazhuang, China) in compliance with the reference methods released by the Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China.</p>
      <p id="d2e680">The time resolutions were 1 s for PAX and 1 min for the other instruments. Thus the raw results from PAX were converted to 1 min averages before further analyses. The on-line measurement results were summarized in Fig. 1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Off-line measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e691">Daytime and nighttime PM<sub>2.5</sub> samples were collected at the same site with the on-line instruments during the campaign. The sampling was done by a mass flow controlled high-volume sampler (TE-6070BLX-2.5-HVS; Tisch Environmental Inc., OH, USA), which was operated at a flow rate of 1.13 m<sup>3</sup> min<sup>−1</sup> using pre-baked quartz-fiber filters (Pall Corp., NY, USA). To avoid rush hours, the daytime and nighttime samples were collected from 09:00 to 16:00 and from 21:00 to 05:00 of the next day, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e724">Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) of the filter samples were measured by a thermal/optical carbon analyzer (DRI-2001; Atmoslytic Inc., CA, USA), using the IMPROVE-A temperature protocol with the transmittance charring correction. The carbon analyzer also provided optical attenuation (ATN) results for the filter samples. ATN was calculated as ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">final</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">initial</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">initial</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">final</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the filter transmittance signals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured at the beginning (i.e., when the particle-laden filter has not been heated) and the end (i.e., when all the deposited carbon has been combusted off the filter) of thermal-optical analysis, respectively. Then the absorption coefficient (Mm<sup>−1</sup>) could be determined as ATN <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the filter area loaded with particles (mm<sup>2</sup>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the volume of the air sampled (m<sup>3</sup>). It should be noted that when using the carbon analyzer, the absorption coefficients were derived at a single wavelength of 632 nm without any correction, for either the loading effect or the multiple scattering effect.</p>
      <p id="d2e833">Water extracts of the filter samples were analyzed for inorganic ions using an ion chromatography system. The samples were also extracted by methanol to measure brown carbon (BrC). Light absorption spectra of the methanol extracts were detected over the wavelength range of 200–1110 nm, using a spectrophotometer (Ocean Optics Inc., FL, USA) coupled with a 2.5 m long liquid waveguide capillary cell (LWCC; World Precision Instruments Inc., FL, USA). The absorption coefficients determined in this approach, which were actually the absorption coefficients of the dissolved brown carbon (i.e., methanol-soluble BrC), will be referred to as (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Open-access data</title>
      <p id="d2e860">Air quality data, e.g., hourly PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations, were obtained from a nearby air quality monitoring site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 km away from the HIT site) operated by the China National Environmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC; <uri>https://air.cnemc.cn:18007/</uri>, last access: 14 May 2026). Meteorological data (e.g., temperature, relatively humidity and wind speed) were obtained with a time resolution of 1 h from Weather Underground (<uri>https://www.wunderground.com/</uri>, last access: 14 May 2026).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Integrating optical parameters derived from different methods</title>
      <p id="d2e910">We first compared the light absorption coefficients derived from the PAX at 870 nm and from the AE33 at 880 nm, which will be termed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@870 and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880, respectively. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@870 results were not subject to artifacts associated with filter-based absorption measurement, as they were obtained using in-situ technology. For (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880, although the loading effect had been accounted for, other artifacts still existed, which could be attributed mainly to the multiple scattering by the filter fibers and the scattering by the particles embedded in the filter. The experimental setup used in this study did not allow distinguishing the two artifacts. However, their overall effect could be determined by comparing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@870. The (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@870 ratios, which will be termed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, generally exhibited a normal distribution for the spring campaign, with a mean of 2.67 and a standard deviation of 0.54 (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The values suggested that the overall effect of multiple scattering and aerosol scattering resulted in a significant overestimation of light absorption by (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880. Further investigations indicated that the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was closely related to SSA (Figs. 2 and S2; Table 1). The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was as low as 1.24 for the lower end of SSA (below 0.60) encountered in the spring campaign. Then <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increased sharply as SSA became higher, e.g., with a median of 2.06 for the SSA range of 0.65–0.70. However, the variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was largely flattened when SSA further increased. For example, compared to that observed for the SSA range of 0.65–0.70, the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4 higher when SSA reaching 0.80-0.85. Finally, with increasing SSA, the increase of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> became sharp again, e.g., with a median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 3.27 for the higher end of SSA (0.95–1.00). The clear dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on SSA suggested the limitation of using a fixed value for the scattering-associated correction in filter-based absorption measurement. To enhance the relevance of time-resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to future studies, the median values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were presented in Table 1 for various SSA bins (from below 0.60 to above 0.95), which covered the typical SSA levels observed for ambient conditions. We applied the SSA-dependent median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1) to AE33 and found that the corrected (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880 were in reasonable agreement with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@870 (Fig. 3a), demonstrating the practicability of the SSA-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results.</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1220">Dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on SSA, both of which had a time resolution of 1 min. Results involved in this figure were for the entire measurement period.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1243">SSA-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>* results determined during the spring campaign.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="2cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">SSA range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.50–0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.60–0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.65–0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.70–0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.75–0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">0.80–0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.85–0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.90–0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.95–1.00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.76</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.27</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Lower quartile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.90</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.34</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">2.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">2.91</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Upper quartile of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>*</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.35</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">3.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">3.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1" align="left">Fraction in total data points (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.89</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24.73</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">30.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">26.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.64</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1478">We then compared the light absorption coefficients determined by the AE33 and off-line carbon analyzer. The off-line results, which were obtained at 632 nm with no correction, will be specified as (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632. To align with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632, the AE33-based absorption coefficients at the same wavelength, i.e., (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632, were converted from the directly-measured (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 660 nm using AAE<sub>bulk</sub>, which described the wavelength dependence of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The time-resolved (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 results were first averaged for the filter sampling segments and then compared to the off-line (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632. As shown in Fig. 3b, the off-line measurements always resulted in higher absorption coefficients compared to AE33, and their relationship could be approximated by the following linear function: (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">@</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">632</mml:mn><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">@</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">632</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.36</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). As the differences in measurement wavelength and time resolution had been accounted for, a likely cause for the observed discrepancies was the difference in filter media used by the two instruments. As stated in the Methods section, the carbon analyzer used quartz filters, whereas the AE33 was operated with M8060 filter tapes. Although the material of M8060 was not specified by the AE33 manufacture, the multiple scattering correction factors of M8060 were determined to be generally comparable with the previously used M8020 (i.e., PTFE-coated glass-fiber filter), e.g., with relative standard deviations of within 5 % for different types of sites in Europe (Yus-Díez et al., 2021). Field campaigns conducted at various locations suggested that compared to M8020, quartz filter showed stronger multiple scattering effect and thus required a higher correction factor, e.g., 2.14 vs. 1.57 for the fresh aerosols in Klagenfurt, Austria (Drinovec et al., 2015) and 3.43 vs. 2.64 for the aged aerosols in Milan, Italy (Ferrero et al., 2021). This indicated that when running two AE33 side-by-side with different filter media, quartz filter would lead to higher (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than M8020, by factors of about 1.3–1.4. A comparable discrepancy was observed in St. Louis for the absorption coefficients measured by quartz and glass-fiber filters, which differed by a factor of 1.41 (Snyder and Schauer, 2007). These ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.3–1.4) were close to the slope shown in Fig. 3b, indicating that the (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 vs. (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 discrepancies could be attributed primarily to the use of different types of filters in off-line and on-line measurements. In addition, it was noticed that the linear dependence of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 on (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 did not hold for the two samples collected on the nights of 1 and 2 April  2023, which showed the highest carbon loadings (above 115 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>gC cm<sup>−2</sup> for the sum of OC and EC) and ATN levels (exceeding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5) throughout the campaign. For these two heavily-loaded samples, the ratios of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 to (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 were only 1.27 and 1.18, respectively. It appeared that the absorption coefficients derived from the carbon analyzer could be biased low at high filter loadings. This artifact was to some extent similar to the loading effect in the Aethalometer measurement but seemed unapparent at relatively low filter loadings.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1815"><bold>(a)</bold> Comparison of the corrected (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880 and the PAX-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@870 for the entire measurement period. The two parameters had the same time resolution of 1 min and showed a median RSD (relative standard deviation) of 8.5 %. The correction of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880 was based on the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values in Table 1. <bold>(b)</bold> Comparison of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632. The former was directly derived from the carbon analyzer without any correction, while the latter was obtained by extrapolating the AE33-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@660 to 632 nm. In <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>, the dashed lines indicate the linear regression results with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the slope and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as the intercept. In <bold>(b)</bold>, the linear dependence did not hold for two heavily loaded filters which were highlighted by the solid circles.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1956">We also compared the brown carbon results measured by the AE33 and off-line (i.e., methanol extraction) approaches. It has been widely accepted that methanol could dissolve the vast majority (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 90 %) of organic aerosol, making methanol-soluble OC (MSOC) a frequently-used surrogate for BrC (Laskin et al., 2015, 2025). The absorption coefficients of MSOC, which were directly measured, will be primarily investigated at 365 nm and the corresponding results will be termed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@365. For AE33, the absorption coefficient of BrC at 370 nm was calculated as:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M127" display="block"><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">@</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">@</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">@</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">880</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">370</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AAE</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          In Eq. (1), (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@880 indicate the absorption coefficients at 370 and 880 nm, respectively, both of which had been corrected for the scattering-associated artifacts using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>* values in Table 1; AAE<sub>BC</sub> is the absorption Ångström exponent of black carbon, a parameter describing the wavelength dependence of BC-induced light absorption. Two assumptions were involved in the calculation, including (i) the light absorption coefficient measured at 880 nm could be attributed only to black carbon and (ii) the coefficients observed at shorter wavelengths could be broken down into the contributions from BC and BrC (Lack and Langridge, 2013). A variety of AAE<sub>BC</sub> were tested in this study, first from 0.7 to 1.4 with an increment of 0.05. As shown in Fig. 4, the AE33-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 and the solution-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@365 kept strong correlation (with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> staying above 0.99) regardless of the values assumed for AAE<sub>BC</sub>. In addition, when increasing the AAE<sub>BC</sub> from 0.7 to 1.4, the regression slope decreased slowly from 1.52 to 1.24 whereas the intercept changed sharply from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.56</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The intercept turned from a positive value into negative when the AAE<sub>BC</sub> was changed from 1.05 to 1.10. Thus we further tested various AAE<sub>BC</sub> values in this range with a smaller increment of 0.01. The intercept was found to be closest to zero (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for an AAE<sub>BC</sub> value of 1.10 (Fig. S3), e.g., compared to an intercept of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for an AAE<sub>BC</sub> of 1.09. It appeared that a reasonable correlation could be reached for the on-line and off-line BrC results by assuming AAE<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, a slope of 1.38 retrieved under this assumption suggested that the AE33-based absorption coefficients of BrC were considerably higher than results from the methanol extracts of filter samples. This discrepancy should be associated with the states of the measured BrC, since particulate brown carbon has been found to show higher absorption coefficients than dissolved BrC (Liu et al., 2013; Washenfelder, et al., 2015). Another likely cause for this discrepancy was the OC insoluble in methanol (MIOC), which could be a considerable contributor to BrC absorption but was missed by the solution-based approach for BrC determination (Atwi et al., 2022).</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2277">Slope, intercept and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> determined by regressing the AE33-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 against the solution-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@365. Different AAE<sub>BC</sub> values were assumed to retrieve the time-resolved (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370, which were first averaged for the filter sampling segments and then used for the regression.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Identification of different episodes</title>
      <p id="d2e2358">There have been numerous evidences suggesting pronounced influences of aerosol sources on the mass absorption efficiency of brown carbon (MAE<sub>BrC</sub>), which is defined as the ratio of BrC's absorption coefficient to its mass concentration. For example, regarding seasonal variations, MAE<sub>BrC</sub> typically peaked in winter due to increased emissions from coal combustion and/or biomass burning (Mo et al., 2024). In addition, MAE<sub>BrC</sub> were found to show diurnal variations with higher nighttime levels during winter in Northeast China, and this pattern was inferred to be driven primarily by the emissions from heavy-duty diesel trucks, which were allowed to operate only at night for the main urban area (Cheng et al., 2023). Spatial variations were also evident for MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, e.g., water-soluble BrC, which was strongly associated with SOA, was observed to be more absorbing in Los Angeles compared to Atlanta (Zhang et al., 2011). In that study, SOA were traced back mainly to anthropogenic VOCs for Los Angeles, and to biogenic precursors for Atlanta. The authors then speculated that secondary BrC from anthropogenic precursors likely had stronger capacities of light absorption compared to biogenic SOA, while this inference was confirmed shortly by chamber studies (Lambe et al., 2013; Liu et al., 2016).</p>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2399">Variations of <bold>(a)</bold> MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, <bold>(b)</bold> PM<sub>2.5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<sub>10</sub>, <bold>(c)</bold> K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate, <bold>(d)</bold> wind speeds, <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub> and <bold>(f)</bold>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across cases of A–D, which correspond to the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted, fire-impacted and typical samples, respectively. Lower and upper box bounds indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, the whiskers below and above the box indicate the 5th and 95th percentiles, the solid circles below and above the box indicate the minimum and maximum, and the open circle within the box marks the median.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2512">Given its close association with aerosol sources, in this study, MAE<sub>BrC</sub> was first investigated to distinguish different types of pollution episodes. To avoid the omission of MIOC contribution, we applied the bulk BrC light absorption from AE33 and calculated MAE<sub>BrC</sub> as the ratio of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 to OC. For each filter sample, the off-line OC was used as BrC mass while the corresponding BrC absorption coefficient took the average of the AE33-based results during the filter sampling period. The MAE<sub>BrC</sub> results were found to vary significantly (from 0.12 to 3.23 m<sup>2</sup> gC<sup>−1</sup>) during the spring campaign, pointing to changeable drivers for the haze pollution. Two groups of samples were most noticeable, showing MAE<sub>BrC</sub> levels at the lower and higher ends of the spring results, respectively. The first group (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, case A in Fig. 5) had a MAE<sub>BrC</sub> range of 0.12 to 0.40 m<sup>2</sup> gC<sup>−1</sup> (Fig. 5a), and the samples exhibited the following characteristics (Fig. 5b–d): relatively low ratios of PM<sub>2.5</sub> to PM<sub>10</sub> (0.15 in terms of median value; same hereafter), relatively high wind speeds (8.77 m s<sup>−1</sup>), and relatively low ratios of K<sup>+</sup> to sulfate (0.18). The PM<sub>2.5</sub> to PM<sub>10</sub> ratio (PM<sub>2.5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<sub>10</sub>) was strongly related to the dust influence, typically with a decreasing trend as the dust impact became stronger (Putaud et al., 2010). Thus for the first group of samples, the reduced PM<sub>2.5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<sub>10</sub> together with the elevated wind speeds presumably indicated considerable influences of dusts. In addition, observational results from Northeast China suggested that agricultural fires could effectively enhance the abundances of K<sup>+</sup> but was not a significant contributor to sulfate (Cheng et al., 2021), resulting in spikes of K<sup>+</sup> to sulfate ratios (K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate) that typically coincided with the peaks of levoglucosan to OC ratios (LG <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC). Thus similar to increased LG <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> OC, enhanced K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate could also be used as an indicator for agricultural fires. Conversely, reduced K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate could be translated into little impact of open burning. The clear association between K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate and agricultural fires was also supported by the contrasting fire hotspot detection results between periods with different K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate levels (Fig. S4). Then based on a synthesis of PM<sub>2.5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<sub>10</sub>, wind speed and K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate, it was concluded that the first group of samples were subject to strong influences of dusts but insignificant impacts from agricultural fires. Contrasting to the first group, the second group of samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, case C in Fig. 5) accompanied with the higher-end MAE<sub>BrC</sub> values (1.75–3.23 m<sup>2</sup> gC<sup>−1</sup>) showed quite different features (Fig. 5a–d), including higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<sub>10</sub> (0.69), lower wind speeds (2.71 m s<sup>−1</sup>) and larger K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate (0.52). These signatures suggested strong influences of agricultural fires but little impact of dusts. In the following discussions, the first and second groups of samples will be referred to as dust-impacted and fire-impacted ones, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e2994">After excluding the two distinct groups discussed above, the remaining samples showed moderate MAE<sub>BrC</sub> levels but considerable variations in other signatures. Some of the samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>7, the third group; case B in Fig. 5) were heavily polluted in PM<sub>10</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 140–305 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and exhibited mixed features of the dust-impacted and fire-impacted samples (Fig. 5b–d), with the median values of all the three signatures (i.e., PM<sub>2.5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<sub>10</sub>, wind speed and K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate) falling in-between the first two groups. The other samples (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the fourth group; case D in Fig. 5) had substantially lower PM<sub>10</sub> (averaging <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">53.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>) and were characterized by pretty low K<sup>+</sup> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> sulfate (0.12), and moderate levels of both PM<sub>2.5</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> PM<sub>10</sub> (0.46) and wind speeds (4.44 m s<sup>−1</sup>). It appeared that neither agricultural fires nor dusts exerted a strong influence on these samples, which could thus be used to represent the typical conditions of the spring campaign. In the following discussions, the third and fourth groups of samples will be termed fire&amp;dust-impacted and typical ones, respectively. For different group of samples (i.e., cases A–D), the distributions of their sampling segments were highly irregular during the spring campaign (Fig. S5), suggesting dramatic variations of aerosol sources for the measurement period.</p>
      <p id="d2e3202">The identification of the four groups was also supported by the spectral measurement results from the methanol extracts of filter samples. It has been commonly recognized that light absorption by brown carbon exhibits stronger wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) dependence compared to black carbon, leading to larger absorption Ångström exponent of BrC (AAE<sub>BrC</sub>). Using the solution-based light absorption spectra, AAE<sub>BrC</sub> could be determined as the slope derived from the linear regression of ln[(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] against ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). As shown by our previous study in Northeast China, when the agricultural fire impact was insignificant, ln[(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] exhibited a strong linear correlation with ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and thus AAE<sub>BrC</sub> could be readily determined over a relatively wide wavelength range of 310–460 nm (Cheng et al., 2023). During agricultural fire episodes, however, the dependence of ln[(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] on ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) tended to be non-linear, since the fire-emitted chromophores could result in a distinct absorption peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 365 nm (Cheng et al., 2023). The non-linear correlation between ln[(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] and ln(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was also evident for the fire-impacted samples in this study. To quantitatively describe the non-linearity, we calculated the difference in AAE<sub>BrC</sub> over two wavelength ranges (i.e., 410–460 and 310–360 nm) and defined this difference as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub> (Fig. S6). As shown in Fig. 5e, different groups of samples indeed showed considerable discrepancies in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub>. For example, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub> levels were found to be highest for the fire-impacted samples (7.60 in terms of median value), moderate for the fire&amp;dust-impacted samples (2.81), and lowest for the dust-impacted samples (1.30). In addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub> differed significantly between the fire&amp;dust-impacted and typical samples (2.81 vs. 1.86), demonstrating the necessity for further distinguishing the two groups of samples despite their comparable MAE<sub>BrC</sub> levels.</p>
      <p id="d2e3423">Another diagnostic parameter that could be derived from the light absorption spectra of MSOC was the ratio of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 250 nm to that at 365 nm, which was usually termed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This ratio was proposed as an indicator for the chemical properties of the dissolved organics, e.g., higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically indicated smaller molecular sizes and lower aromaticity (Duarte et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2019). In this study, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited a clear decreasing trend across the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted and fire-impacted samples (Fig. 5f), i.e., with increasing impacts of agricultural fires. On one hand, this trend confirmed the heterogeneity of different groups of samples, from the perspective of the chemical properties of MSOC. On the other hand, this trend suggested that compared to those associated with dusts, the fire-emitted organic compounds were likely characterized by higher molecular weights and higher aromatic contents, which should be highly responsible for the strong light absorption capacities of the fire-impacted samples.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3498">Comparison of water-soluble ion compositions across the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted, fire-impacted and typical samples. In each pie chart, the unlabeled fraction indicates the sum of the primary ions.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Comparison of inorganic species across different episodes</title>
      <p id="d2e3515">Figure 6 compares the compositions of water-soluble inorganic ions among different groups of samples. The ions were broadly separated into secondary species (i.e., sulfate, nitrate and ammonium) and primary components (i.e., Cl<sup>−</sup>, K<sup>+</sup>, Na<sup>+</sup>, Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup>). Based on the ion concentrations averaged for each group, the dust-impacted samples were found to differ significantly from the other ones in three aspects, including higher fraction of primary species in total ions (48% vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), larger contribution of Ca<sup>2+</sup> to primary ions (61 % vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and higher ratio of sulfate to nitrate (1.31 vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The fire-impacted samples also exhibited several distinct features, including the dominant contribution of Cl<sup>−</sup> to primary ions (68 % vs. &lt;40% for the other groups) and the remarkably high ratio of nitrate to sulfate (4.73). Actually, the fraction of Ca<sup>2+</sup> in primary ions showed a clear decreasing trend across the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted and fire-impacted episodes (from 61 % to 12 %), while an opposite trend was observed for the fraction of Cl<sup>−</sup> (from 10 % to 68 %). These patterns were not surprising, since Ca<sup>2+</sup> and Cl<sup>−</sup> had been commonly identified in dust and agricultural fire emissions, respectively (Bi et al., 2019). One may argue that Cl<sup>−</sup> should be used in Sect. 3.2 for the separation of samples into different groups. Besides open burning, however, there existed other important sources for Cl<sup>−</sup> (Bi et al., 2019), e.g., coal combustion. Given the relatively low temperatures during the spring campaign (averaging 8.5 and around 0 °C for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % of the samples), coal combustion was expected to contribute considerably. The prevalence of coal combustion emissions was in line with the largely comparable Cl<sup>−</sup> to sulfate ratios observed for the samples after excluding the fire-impacted ones (Fig. S7). The substantial contribution of Cl<sup>−</sup> to primary ions (37 %) determined for the typical samples also confirmed the substantial contribution of coal combustion. The discussions above indicated that the relative abundances of Cl<sup>−</sup> could be used to isolate the periods with strong influences of fires, but were less capable of identifying other episodes (e.g., the fire&amp;dust-impacted samples).</p>
      <p id="d2e3723">The fire-impacted samples showed significantly higher relative abundance of nitrate compared to sulfate (Fig. 6), likely pointing to enhanced formation of nitrate under strong influences of agricultural fire emissions. This inference was supported by the comparison of nitrogen oxidation ratios (NOR) among different episodes (Fig. 7a). For the typical conditions of spring (i.e., as reflected by the typical samples), NOR generally exhibited an increasing trend as ozone became higher (Fig. 7a), showing larger values (accompanied with elevated ozone) during the daytime (Fig. S8). The positive dependence of NOR on ozone held as well for the fire-impacted samples, all of which occurred at night. However, it is noteworthy that the fire-impacted samples generally showed higher NOR values than the typical ones with comparable ozone levels. Although drivers for the increased NOR remained unclear based on the available observations, it was hypothesized that some distinct dark-reactions occurred in the agricultural fire plumes and ultimately enhanced the nitrate formation. As suggested by results from the laboratory-generated biomass burning smoke (Ahern et al., 2018) and ambient open-burning plume (Decker et al., 2019), such nocturnal processes may include the production of NO<sub>3</sub> radicals and N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, the heterogeneous transformation of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> into nitrate (e.g., on the surface of the abundant biomass-burning particles), and the reaction of NO<sub>3</sub> radicals with biomass burning VOCs (which could result in complex products including nitrate). In addition, for the fire-impacted samples, the conditions with relatively low ratios of NO<sub>2</sub> to CO (NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO) seemed more favorable for the enhancement of NOR (Fig. 7b). Results from the laboratory measurement and satellite-based observation of biomass burning smoke suggested that decreased NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO ratios were typically associated with more smoldering combustion, which would emit large amounts of CO but was less favorable for NO<sub>2</sub> production (van der Velde et al., 2021; Anderson et al., 2023). Thus the association between elevated NOR and reduced NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO likely indicated that the low-efficiency fires were more favorable for the nocturnal nitrate formation. It should also be noted that NOR exhibited considerable sample-by-sample variations at similarly low levels of NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO (e.g., below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05). A possible explanation was that the NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO values presented in Fig. 7b were the averages of the time-resolved results measured during the fire episodes, and thus were only rough indicators for the overall burning conditions. Another likely cause was that besides the combustion efficiency, there existed other influencing factors for NOR in the fire plumes. The detailed chemical mechanisms for the fire-induced enhancement in nocturnal NOR, including the roles of combustion efficiencies (which are expected to influence the profiles of the fire emissions), merit further investigations.</p>

      <fig id="F7"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3890">Dependences of NOR on <bold>(a)</bold> ozone (as shown by the solid circles) and <bold>(b)</bold> NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO for the fire-impacted samples. In <bold>(a)</bold>, results from the typical samples are also presented for comparison, as shown by the overlaying box plot. Here the typical samples were divided into three subgroups with ozone concentrations of below 50, 50–100 and 100–150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>g m<sup>−3</sup>, respectively. NOR was calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nitrate/(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-nitrate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-NO<sub>2</sub>), where “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” indicates the molar concentration. To align with the off-line nitrate, the time-resolved NO<sub>2</sub> were first averaged for the filter sampling segments and then used for the NOR calculation.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Impacts of open burning and secondary formation on the BrC-related signatures</title>
      <p id="d2e4007">As discussed in Sect. 3.2, agricultural fire emissions exhibited pronounced influences on MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, by enhancing the light absorption capacity of bulk BrC, emitting distinct chromophores with a characteristic absorption peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 365 nm, and producing organic compounds with relatively high molecular weights and aromatic contents, respectively. Besides these signatures, the wavelength dependence of aerosol absorption (AAE<sub>bulk</sub>) and the relative importance of BrC absorption (primarily investigated at 370 nm as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370) were also significantly impacted by the fire emissions. Here <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 was calculated as the ratio of (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 to (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370, with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 obtained by applying the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>* values in Table 1 to the AE33 results and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 determined by Eq. (1) using an AAE<sub>BC</sub> of 1.10. As can be seen from Figs. 8a and S9, both AAE<sub>bulk</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 showed clear increasing trends as the fire impacts became stronger. For example, the median AAE<sub>bulk</sub> increased substantially across the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted and fire-impacted samples (from 1.50 to 2.45). Meanwhile, the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 was enhanced by 2.5 folds, from 28 % to 70 %. These patterns were not surprising, given the significance of biomass burning as a BrC source (Washenfelder et al., 2015) and the fact that the light absorption by BrC typically shows stronger wavelength dependence, i.e., increases more sharply towards shorter wavelengths, compared to BC. In addition, it appeared that AAE<sub>bulk</sub> could be considered as an alternative estimate for the BrC contribution to aerosol absorption, since a consistent dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 on AAE<sub>bulk</sub> was observed for different episodes, regardless of the variations of aerosol sources (Fig. 8b).</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4239"><bold>(a)</bold> Variation of AAE<sub>bulk</sub> across cases of A–D, which correspond to the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted, fire-impacted and typical samples, respectively. <bold>(b)</bold> Relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 and AAE<sub>bulk</sub> (results from different cases were not distinguished). Time-resolved AAE<sub>bulk</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 were first extracted for the filter sampling segments and then used for the comparisons.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4305"><bold>(a)</bold> Relationship between time-resolved AAE<sub>bulk</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO for the fire episodes. <bold>(b)</bold> Comparison of the AE33-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 and the filter-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@365. <bold>(c)</bold> Relationship between time-resolved SSA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 for the fire episodes. In <bold>(b)</bold>, results from the fire-impacted and other samples were shown separately, while the dashed line indicates the linear regression result determined based on all of the spring samples. The sample collected on the night of 15 April  2023 was indicated by the arrow. In <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold>, results during the collection period of this specific sample were also highlighted, as shown by the red data points.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4401">For the agricultural fire episodes, AAE<sub>bulk</sub> generally exhibited a negative dependence on the ratio of NO<sub>2</sub> to CO, e.g., elevated AAE<sub>bulk</sub> usually occurred at relatively low NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO levels (Fig. 9a). Recalling the association between decreased NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO and more smoldering combustion, the low-efficiency fire emissions were presumably an important driver for the increase of AAE<sub>bulk</sub>, i.e., the enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370. In addition, one fire-impacted sample (collected on the night of 15 April  2023) was noticed to exhibit relatively large discrepancy between the AE33-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 and the solution-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>MS-BrC</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@365 (Fig. 9b), likely suggesting an increase in the fraction of methanol-insoluble species in total OC. This sample was also characterized by relatively low levels of NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO, pointing to the prevalence of low-efficiency fires for the sampling period and the potential contribution of such fires to methanol-insoluble OC. This inference was partially supported by association of reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with decreased NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO (Fig. S10), which indicated that the low-efficiency fires favored the emissions of organic compounds with relatively high molecular weights and aromatic contents. It is also noteworthy that although the BrC particles from agricultural fires, especially those with low efficiencies, contributed considerably to aerosol absorption in the ultraviolet wavelength range, they likely appeared more scattering at 870 nm, the wavelength for the PAX-based SSA determination. For example, SSA exhibited a clear increasing trend as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 became higher (Fig. 9c), indicating that the BrC particles exerted limited impact on the aerosol absorption at 870 nm.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e4580">Comparisons of <bold>(a)</bold> MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, <bold>(b)</bold> AAE<sub>bulk</sub> and <bold>(c)</bold>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 with SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios of below and above 10, for the typical samples. Time-resolved AAE<sub>bulk</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 were first extracted for the filter sampling segments and then used for the comparisons. Only the median values are shown here. Refer to Fig. S11 for detailed comparisons.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4655">SOA formation was identified as another influencing factor for BrC. Here we focused on the typical samples to minimize the impacts of agricultural fires and dusts. Although SOA tracer was not directly measured in this study, the ratio of SNA (i.e., the sum of secondary inorganic ions including sulfate, nitrate and ammonium) to EC could be used as an indirect indicator for the significance of SOA formation. The effectiveness of this indicator was supported by the concurrent enhancements in SNA and SOA repeatedly observed in Harbin (Cheng et al., 2021; Cheng and He, 2026). As shown in Fig. 10a, MAE<sub>BrC</sub> dropped considerably once the SNA to EC ratio (SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC) exceeded 10, with the median MAE<sub>BrC</sub> almost halved (from 0.95 to 0.51 m<sup>2</sup>gC<sup>−1</sup>). It appeared that the bulk BrC tended to be less absorbing as more SOA was produced. This pattern was with expectation, since SOA typically had weaker light absorption capacities than primary organic matters (Kumar et al., 2018; Cappa et al., 2020). Similar to MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, AAE<sub>bulk</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370 were also substantially lower for the SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC range of above 10 (Fig. 10b–c), with their median values decreasing from 1.64 to 1.35 and from 37 % to 18 %, respectively. The discussions above suggested that SOA formation could reduce the MAE of bulk BrC and the influence of BrC on the total light absorption of aerosol.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Evidences for considerable light absorption enhancement of black carbon</title>
      <p id="d2e4750">Similar to MAE<sub>BrC</sub>, the mass absorption efficiency of BC (MAE<sub>BC</sub>) was calculated as the ratio of the PAX-based (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@870 to EC, and the results were specified as MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870. A consensus had been reached that the mass absorption efficiency of uncoated black carbon should be at least 5 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> at 550 nm (Bond et al., 2013; Petzold et al., 2013). This lower limit, which was suggested as a fundamental physical property of black carbon, could be converted to a threshold value of 3.02 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> at 870 nm (using an AAE<sub>BC</sub> of 1.1). For the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted and fire-impacted episodes, the majority (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 %–90 %) of the samples showed MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 values smaller than 3.02 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>, and the median MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 were only 1.59, 1.95 and 2.25 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>, respectively (Fig. 11a). Such unrealistically low MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 could hardly be explained by uncertainties in the PAX-based absorption measurement but pointed to overestimation of black carbon mass by EC. In thermal-optical analysis, the interfering components for EC determination may include carbonate and brown carbon, which were closely associated with dusts and biomass burning, respectively. For example, previous studies suggested that calcium carbonate (CaCO<sub>3</sub>) did not completely decompose at 650 °C when heated in an inert atmosphere (Karanasiou et al., 2011), and tar balls from open burning could retain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30% of their volumes at 600 °C (Adachi et al., 2017; Sedlacek III et al., 2018). For the IMPROVE-A temperature protocol used in this study, the peak temperature of the inert mode was 580 °C. Thus when the dust and/or agricultural fire impacts were significant, it was very likely that a fraction of the carbonate and/or brown carbon could slip into the oxidizing mode of the analysis and then be misidentified as EC. It is also noteworthy that among the fire episodes, the events with unrealistically low MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 values (e.g., around 2 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>) typically showed relatively smaller NO<sub>2</sub> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> CO (Fig. S12), suggesting the low-efficiency fires as an important source for the interfering species in thermal-optical EC measurement.</p>

      <fig id="F11"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e4988"><bold>(a)</bold> Variation of MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 across cases of A–D, which correspond to the dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted, fire-impacted and typical samples, respectively. Results from the typical samples were further divided into three subgroups, i.e., D-1 to D-3 which had SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ratios of below 5, 5–10 and above 10, respectively. Comparisons of <bold>(b)</bold> RH and <bold>(c)</bold> SSA across D-1 to D-3 (only the median values are shown).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/6541/2026/acp-26-6541-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5021">The overestimation of EC mass became non-evident for the typical samples, as indicated by their MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 levels which stayed above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> (Fig. 11a). In addition, the MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 values were found to exhibit significant sample-by-sample variations. In general, MAE<sub>BC</sub> is strongly influenced by the particle mixing state, with relatively low levels for uncoated black carbon. As BC is internally mixed with (i.e., coated by) non-refractory components (e.g., sulfate), MAE<sub>BC</sub> typically tends to increase to varying degrees, and the specific magnitude depends on many factors such as the complex refractive index of the coating materials (Liu et al., 2014) and the detailed particle morphology (e.g., the position of BC within the coating materials; Huang et al., 2024). In this study, the variations of MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 were closely related to the changes in SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC. As shown in Fig. 11a, MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 showed a clear increasing trend across the SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ranges of below 5, 5–10 and above 10, with the median MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 increasing from 3.83 to 4.53 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup> and finally reaching 8.94 m<sup>2</sup> g<sup>−1</sup>. SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC was not only a direct measure of secondary inorganic aerosol production but also an indirect indicator for SOA formation (as discussed in Sect. 3.4). Thus the positive dependence of MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 on SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC was presumably driven by secondary aerosols, which could effectively enhance BC absorption by internal mixing. Using the median MAE<sub>BC</sub>@870 determined for the SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC range of below 5 as the reference, the light absorption enhancement (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) factors were estimated to be 1.18 and 2.33 for the SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ranges of 5–10 and above 10, respectively. Given that RH increased substantially across the three SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC ranges (Fig. 11b), heterogeneous reactions involving aerosol water was inferred to be highly favorable for the secondary aerosol production and BC absorption enhancement. In addition, SSA elevated slightly with increasing SNA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> EC (Fig. 11c), indicating that the particles tended to be more scattering as the secondary aerosol formation was enhanced. </p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e5256">During a spring period with dramatic variations of PM<sub>2.5</sub> sources, PAX, AE33 and off-line observations were integrated to explore the aerosol optical properties in a representative megacity in Northeast China. PAX was used as the reference method to constrain the scattering-associated artifacts in the AE33-based absorption measurement. The correction factor retrieved (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was found to depend positively on SSA whereas their relationship was non-linear. To enhance the relevance of the time-resolved correction factors to future studies, we determined the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for various SSA bins, which covered the typical SSA ranges encountered in ambient conditions. After applying the SSA-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the corrected AE33 results were in reasonable agreement with the PAX-based absorption coefficients. We also observed considerable differences but strong correlations between the AE33 and off-line absorption measurements. For the absorption coefficient of bulk aerosol, the carbon analyzer reported higher values than AE33, with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">#</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632 approximately 50 % larger than (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@632. This discrepancy was primarily attributed to the different filter materials used by the two instruments. In addition, for the absorption coefficient of brown carbon, results from the AE33 were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.4 times higher than those obtained by the spectrophotometric measurement of BrC solutions. A likely cause for this discrepancy was the difference in the states of the measured BrC (particulate vs. dissolved), while another contributor was inferred to be the chromophores insoluble in methanol, which were not accounted for in the solution-based approach.</p>
      <p id="d2e5341">After elucidating the relationships between the optical parameters determined by different approaches, we identified three types of episodes (i.e., dust-impacted, fire&amp;dust-impacted, and fire-impacted) and the typical periods for the spring campaign. The classification was based on a synthesis of various signatures, including the MAE of BrC, the PM<sub>2.5</sub> to PM<sub>10</sub> ratio, wind speed and the K<sup>+</sup> to sulfate ratio. The classification results were also supported by another two signatures, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5406">By comparing results from different periods, we highlighted the strong impacts of agricultural fire emissions on BrC. For example, the fires effectively enhanced the light absorption capacity of bulk BrC, emitted distinct chromophores with a characteristic absorption peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 365 nm (as indicated by the increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>AAE<sub>BrC</sub>), and produced organic compounds with relatively high molecular weights and aromatic contents (as indicated by the decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">250</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">365</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). In addition, the agricultural fires, especially those having relatively low combustion efficiencies, effectively increased the AAE of bulk aerosol and the BrC contribution to total absorption in the ultraviolet wavelength range.</p>
      <p id="d2e5450">We also unfolded the responses of BrC and BC optical properties to secondary aerosol formation. For typical samples, i.e., those without significant impacts from agricultural fires or dusts, we found that with the enhancement of secondary aerosol, the bulk BrC appeared less absorbing and consequently, the BrC influences on the light absorption of total aerosol became weaker, as reflected by the concurrent decreases in AAE<sub>bulk</sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>@370. However, there was observational evidence pointing to a considerable increase in the MAE of BC driven by secondary aerosol production, which could be translated into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">abs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> factors of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.3.</p>
      <p id="d2e5492">Finally, our results revealed the distinctiveness of the low-efficiency agricultural fire emissions in Northeast China. In addition to emitting unique organic matters (e.g., those with relatively high molecular weights and aromatic contents, and those strongly interfering thermal-optical EC determination), and effectively enhancing the BrC impacts on total aerosol light absorption, such fires could also promote nocturnal nitrate formation, likely due to some distinct dark-reactions. We suggest that the low-efficiency fires merit further investigations, e.g., for the emissions of gaseous and particulate species, the plume evolution, and the interactions of the fire emissions with other anthropogenic pollutants.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5500">Data described in this manuscript can be accessed at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18898994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18898994</ext-link> (Cheng, 2026).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e5506">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6541-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6541-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e5515">YC and JL designed the study and prepared the paper, with inputs from all the co-authors. XC, YG, YZ and ZZ carried out the experiments. KH validated the results and supervised the study.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e5521">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e5527">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e5533">The authors thank Dr. Yue-mei Han at Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences for the help in sample analysis.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e5538">This research has been supported by the Jing-Jin-Ji Regional Integrated Environmental Improvement-National Science and Technology Major Project (2026ZD1216000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42222706), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (YQ2024D011), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e5544">This paper was edited by Zhibin Wang and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Sedlacek III, A. J., Kleinman, L., Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., and Buseck, P. R.: Volume changes upon heating of aerosol particles from biomass burning using transmission electron microscopy, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 52, 46–56, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Ahern, A. T., Goldberger, L., Jahl, L., Thornton, J., and Sullivan, R. C.: Production of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and ClNO<sub>2</sub> through nocturnal processing of biomass-burning aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 550–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b04386</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, L. D., Dix, B., Schnell, J., Yokelson, R., Veefkind, J. P., Ahmadov, R., and de Gouw, J.: Analyzing the impact of evolving combustion conditions on the composition of wildfire emissions using satellite data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105811" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GL105811</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Atwi, K., Cheng, Z. Z., El Hajj, O., Perrie, C., and Saleh, R.: A dominant contribution to light absorption by methanol-insoluble brown carbon produced in the combustion of biomass fuels typically consumed in wildland fires in the United States, Environ. Sci. Atmos., 2, 182–191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ea00065a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d1ea00065a</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bi, X., Dai, Q., Wu, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, W., Luo, R., Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, L., Yu, Z., Zhang, Y., Tian, Y., and Feng, Y.: Characteristics of the main primary source profiles of particulate matter across China from 1987 to 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3223–3243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3223-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-3223-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T., DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne, S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M., Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K., Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U., Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C. S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5380–5552, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50171</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Lim, C. Y., Hagan, D. H., Coggon, M., Koss, A., Sekimoto, K., de Gouw, J., Onasch, T. B., Warneke, C., and Kroll, J. H.: Biomass-burning-derived particles from a wide variety of fuels – Part 2: Effects of photochemical aging on particle optical and chemical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8511–8532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8511-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8511-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> Chang, X., Zhao, B., Zheng, H. T., Wang, S. X., Cai, S. Y., Guo, F. Q., Gui, P., Huang, G. H., Wu, D., Han, L. C., Xing, J., Man, H. Y., Hu, R. L., Liang, C. R., Xu, Q. C., Qiu, X. H., Ding, D., Liu, K. Y., Han, R., Robinson, A. L., and Donahue, N. M.: Full-volatility emission framework corrects missing and underestimated secondary organic aerosol sources, One Earth, 5, 403–412, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Q. C., Mu, Z., Song, W. H., Wang, Y. Q., Yang, Z. H., Zhang, L. X., and Zhang, Y. L.: Size-resolved characterization of the chromophores in atmospheric particulate matter from a typical coal-burning city in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10546–10563, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031149" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031149</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Chen, X. Y., Ching, J., Wu, F., Matsui, H., Jacobson, M. Z., Zhang, F., Wang, Y. Y., Zhang, Z. X., Liu, D. T., Zhu, S. P., Rudich, Y., Shi, Z. B., Yoo, H., Jeon, K. J., and Li, W. J.: Locating the missing absorption enhancement due to multi-core black carbon aerosols, Nat. Commun., 16, 10187, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65079-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-025-65079-2</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y.: Optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols modulated by source variations of spring haze, Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18898994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.18898994</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y. and He, K. B.: Northeast China: an emerging hotspot of atmospheric sciences, Sci. Bull., 71, 64–66, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.023</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Yu, Q., Liu, J., Cao, X., Zhong, Y., Du, Z., Liang, L., Geng, G., Ma, W., Qi, H., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Dramatic changes in Harbin aerosol during 2018–2020: the roles of open burning policy and secondary aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15199–15211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15199-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-15199-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Cao, X., Liu, J., Zhong, Y., Yu, Q., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Measurement report: Diurnal variations of brown carbon during two distinct seasons in a megacity in northeast China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6241–6253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6241-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-6241-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Decker, Z. C. J., Zarzana, K. J., Coggon, M., Min, K. E., Pollack, I., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Edwards, P., Dubé, W. P., Markovic, M. Z., Roberts, J. M., Veres, P. R., Graus, M., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J., Hatch, L. E., Barsanti, K. C., and Brown, S. S.: Nighttime chemical transformation in biomass burning plumes: a box model analysis initialized with aircraft observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 2529–2538, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05359" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b05359</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Duarte, R. M. B. O., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.: Spectroscopic study of the water-soluble organic matter isolated from atmospheric aerosols collected under different atmospheric conditions, Anal. Chim. Acta, 530, 7–14, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Ferrero, L., Bernardoni, V., Santagostini, L., Cogliati, S., Soldan, F., Valentini, S., Massabò, D., Močnik, G., Gregorič, A., Rigler, M., Prati, P., Bigogno, A., Losi, N., Valli, G., Vecchi, R., and Bolzacchini, E.: Consistent determination of the heating rate of light-absorbing aerosol using wavelength- and time-dependent Aethalometer multiple-scattering correction, Sci. Total Environ., 791, 148277, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148277" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148277</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gao, C. Y., Heald, C. L., Katich, J. M., Luo, G., and Yu, F. Q.: Remote aerosol simulated during the Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) campaign and implications for aerosol lifetime, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD036524, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD036524</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Geng, G. N., Liu, Y. X., Liu, Y., Liu, S. G., Cheng, J., Yan, L., Wu, N. N., Hu, H. W., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Yin, Z. C., He, K. B., and Zhang, Q.: Efficacy of China's clean air actions to tackle PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution between 2013 and 2020, Nat. Geosci., 17, 987–994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01540-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-024-01540-z</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Huang, X. F., Peng, Y., Wei, J., Peng, J. F., Lin, X. Y., Tang, M. X., Cheng, Y., Men, Z., Fang, T., Zhang, J. S., He, L. Y., Cao, L. M., Liu, C., Zhang, C. C., Mao, H. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wang, Y.: Microphysical complexity of black carbon particles restricts their warming potential, One Earth, 7, 136–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Karanasiou, A., Diapouli, E., Cavalli, F., Eleftheriadis, K., Viana, M., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., and Reche, C.: On the quantification of atmospheric carbonate carbon by thermal/optical analysis protocols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2409–2419, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2409-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-2409-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kumar, N. K., Corbin, J. C., Bruns, E. A., Massabó, D., Slowik, J. G., Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Prati, P., Vlachou, A., Baltensperger, U., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Production of particulate brown carbon during atmospheric aging of residential wood-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17843–17861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D., Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D. R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 6349–6357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401043j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es401043j</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr5006167</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Laskin, A., West, C. P., and Hettiyadura A. P. S.: Molecular insights into the composition, sources, and aging of atmospheric brown carbon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 54, 1583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cs00609c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/d3cs00609c</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Kathmann, S. M., Wise, M., Caylor, R., Imholt, F., Selimovic, V., and Shilling, J. E.: Optical properties and aging of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12815–12827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams, L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks, W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N., Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D., Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms9435</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>MEE (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China): Ambient air quality standards (GB 3095-2026), <uri>https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/dqhjbh/dqhjzlbz/202602/t20260225_1144419.shtml</uri> (last access: 14 May 2026), 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Mo, Y., Li, J., Zhong, G., Zhu, S., Zhao, S., Tang, J., Jiang, H., Cheng, Z., Tian, C., Chen, Y., and Zhang, G.: The water-insoluble organic carbon in PM<sub>2.5</sub> of typical Chinese urban areas: light-absorbing properties, potential sources, radiative forcing effects, and a possible light-absorbing continuum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7755–7772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7755-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-7755-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Pileci, R. E., Modini, R. L., Bertò, M., Yuan, J., Corbin, J. C., Marinoni, A., Henzing, B., Moerman, M. M., Putaud, J. P., Spindler, G., Wehner, B., Müller, T., Tuch, T., Trentini, A., Zanatta, M., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel-Beer, M.: Comparison of co-located refractory black carbon (rBC) and elemental carbon (EC) mass concentration measurements during field campaigns at several European sites, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1379–1403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1379-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-1379-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate and health effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 7520–7540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/anie.200501122</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation> Putaud, J. P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W., Cyrys, J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H. C., Harrison, R. M., Herrmann, H., Hitzenberger, R., Hüglin, C., Jones, A. M., Kasper-Giebl, A., Kiss, G., Kousa, A., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Löschau, G., Maenhaut, W., Molnar, A., Moreno, T., Pekkanen, J., Perrino, C., Pitz, M., Puxbaum, H., Querol, X., Rodriguez, S., Salma, I., Schwarz, J., Smolik, J., Schneider, J., Spindler, G., ten Brink, H., Tursic, J., Viana, M., Wiedensohler, A., and Raes, F.: A European aerosol phenomenology-3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1308–1320, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Putaud, J. P., Cavalli, F., Yttri, K. E., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Sinha, B., Venkataraman, C., Ikemori, F., Jaffrezo, J. L., Uzu, G., Moreno, I., Krejci, R., Laj, P., Gupta, T., Hu, M., Kim, S. W., Mayol-Bracero, O., Quinn, P., Aas, W., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Angelucci, M., Anurag, G., Beukes, J. P., Bhardwaj, A., Chatterjee, A., Chaudhary, P., Chhangani, A. K., Conil, S., Degorska, A., Devaliya, S., Dhandapani, A., Duhan, S. S., Dumka, U. C., Habib, G., Hamzavi, Z., Haswani, D., Herrmann, H., Holubova, A., Hueglin, C., Imran, M., Jehangir, A., Kapoor, T. S., Karanasiou, A., Khaiwal, R., Kim, J., Kolesa, T., Kozakiewicz, J., Kranjc, I., Laura, J. S., Lian, Y., Liu, J. W., Manwani, P., Mardoñez-Balderrama, V., Marticorena, B., Matsuki, A., Mor, S., Mukherjee, S., Murthy, S., Muthalagu, A., Najar, T. A., Kumar, R. N., Pandithurai, G., Perez, N., Phairuang, W., Phuleria, H. C., Poulain, L., Prasad, L., Pullokaran, D., Qadri, A. M., Qureshi, A., Ramírez, O., Roy, S., Rüdiger, J., Saikia, B. K., Saikia, P., Sauvage, S., Savvides, C., Sharma, R., Singh, T., Singh, G. K., Spoor, R., Srivastava, A. K., Raman, R. S., Van Zyl, P. G., Vecchiocattivi, M., Voiron, C., Xin, J. Y., and Yadav, K.: A worldwide aerosol phenomenology: elemental and organic carbon in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, Atmos. Environ., 358, 121338, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121338" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121338</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Renzi, L., Di Biagio, C., Heuser, J., Zanatta, M., Cazaunau, M., Bergé, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Isolabella, T., Massabò, D., Vernocchi, V., Mazzini, M., Vogel, F., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., Doussin, J.-F., and Marinoni, A.: The role of size in the multiple scattering correction C for dual-spot aethalometer: a field and laboratory investigation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 1365–1383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1365-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-19-1365-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Herber, A., Kondo, Y., Li, S.-M., Moteki, N., Koike, M., Oshima, N., Schwarz, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Bian, H., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Schulz, M., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Zhang, K.: Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12465–12477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12465-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12465-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Sedlacek III, A. J., Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Onasch, T. B., Springston, S. R., and Kleinman, L.: Formation and evolution of tar balls from northwestern US wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11289–11301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Snyder, D. C. and Schauer, J. J.: An inter-comparison of two black carbon aerosol instruments and a semi-continuous elemental carbon instrument in the urban environment, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 41, 463–474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701222819" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701222819</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Tinorua, S., Denjean, C., Nabat, P., Pont, V., Arnaud, M., Bourrianne, T., Dias Alves, M., and Gardrat, E.: A 2-year intercomparison of three methods for measuring black carbon concentration at a high-altitude research station in Europe, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3897–3915, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Tuccella, P., Di Antonio, L., Di Muzio, A., Colaiuda, V., Lidori, R., Menut, L., Pitari, G., and Raparelli, E.: Modeling the black and brown carbon absorption and their radiative impact: the June 2023 intense Canadian boreal wildfires case study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042674, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042674" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD042674</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>van der Velde, I. R., van der Werf, G. R., Houweling, S., Eskes, H. J., Veefkind, J. P., Borsdorff, T., and Aben, I.: Biomass burning combustion efficiency observed from space using measurements of CO and NO<sub>2</sub> by the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 597–616, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-597-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-597-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y. Y., Zheng, Z. H., Sun, Y., Yao, Y., Ma, P. L., Zhang, A. X., Zhu, S. P., Zhang, Z. X., Chen, X. Y., Pang, Y. E., Wang, Q. Y., Che, H. Z., Ching, J., and Li, W. J.: Improved representation of black carbon mixing structures suggests stronger direct radiative heating, One Earth, 8, 101311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101311</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber, R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Baumann, K., Cohen, R. C., Draper, D. C., Duffey, K. C., Edgerton, E., Fry, J. L., Hu, W. W., Jimenez, J. L., Palm, B. B., Romer, P., Stone, E. A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Brown, S. S.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014GL062444</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., and Baltensperger, U.: Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers, J. Aerosol Sci., 34, 1445–1463, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Winiger, P., Barrett, T. E., Sheesley, R. J., Huang, L., Sharma, S., Barrie, L. A., Yttri, K. E., Evangeliou, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Klimont, Z., Heyes, C., Semiletov, I. P., Dudarev, O. V., Charkin, A., Shakhova, N., Holmstrand, H., Andersson, A., and Gustafsson, Ö.: Source apportionment of circum-Arctic atmospheric black carbon from isotopes and modeling, Sci. Adv., 5, eaau8052, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.aau8052</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wu, X., Cao, F., Haque, M., Fan, M. Y., Zhang, S. C., and Zhang, Y. L.: Molecular composition and source apportionment of fine organic aerosols in Northeast China, Atmos. Environ., 239, 117722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117722" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117722</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, Q. Y., Geng, G. N., Xue, T., Liu, S. G., Cai, C. L., He, K. B., and Zhang, Q.: Tracking PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> pollution and the related health burden in China 2013–2020, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 6922–6932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c04548</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Xie, X. C., Zhang, Y. Z., Liang, R. S., Chen, W., Zhang, P. X., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Cheng, Y., and Liu, J. M.: Wintertime heavy haze episodes in Northeast China driven by agricultural fire emissions, Environ. Sci. Tech. Lett., 11, 150–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00940" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00940</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Yus-Díez, J., Bernardoni, V., Močnik, G., Alastuey, A., Ciniglia, D., Ivančič, M., Querol, X., Perez, N., Reche, C., Rigler, M., Vecchi, R., Valentini, S., and Pandolfi, M.: Determination of the multiple-scattering correction factor and its cross-sensitivity to scattering and wavelength dependence for different AE33 Aethalometer filter tapes: a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6335–6355, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Yus-Díez, J., Drinovec, L., Alados-Arboledas, L., Titos, G., Bazo, E., Casans, A., Patrón, D., Querol, X., Gonzalez-Romero, A., Perez García-Pando, C., and Močnik, G.: Characterization of filter photometer artifacts in soot and dust measurements – laboratory and ambient experiments using a traceably calibrated aerosol absorption reference, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3073–3093, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, J., Liu, L., Xu, L., Lin, Q., Zhao, H., Wang, Z., Guo, S., Hu, M., Liu, D., Shi, Z., Huang, D., and Li, W.: Exploring wintertime regional haze in northeast China: role of coal and biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5355–5372, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5355-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5355-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X. L., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., and Weber, R. J.: Light-absorbing soluble organic aerosol in Los Angeles and Atlanta: a contrast in secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L21810, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049385</ext-link>, 2011. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Zhong, Q. R., Schutgens, N., van der Werf, G. R., Takemura, T., van Noije, T., Mielonen, T., Checa-Garcia, R., Lohmann, U., Kirkevåg, A., Olivié, D. J. L., Kokkola, H., Matsui, H., Kipling, Z., Ginoux, P., Le Sager, P., Rémy, S., Bian, H. S., Chin, M., Zhang, K., Bauer, S. E., and Tsigaridis, K.: Threefold reduction of modeled uncertainty in direct radiative effects over biomass burning regions by constraining absorbing aerosols, Sci. Adv., 9, eadi3568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi3568" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.adi3568</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Measurement report: Optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols modulated by source variations of spring haze</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adachi, K., Sedlacek III, A. J., Kleinman, L., Chand, D., Hubbe, J. M., and
Buseck, P. R.: Volume changes upon heating of aerosol particles from biomass
burning using transmission electron microscopy, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 52,
46–56, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1373181</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ahern, A. T., Goldberger, L., Jahl, L., Thornton, J., and Sullivan, R. C.:
Production of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and ClNO<sub>2</sub> through nocturnal processing of
biomass-burning aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 550–559,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04386</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Anderson, L. D., Dix, B., Schnell, J., Yokelson, R., Veefkind, J. P.,
Ahmadov, R., and de Gouw, J.: Analyzing the impact of evolving combustion
conditions on the composition of wildfire emissions using satellite data,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 50, e2023GL105811,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105811" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GL105811</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Atwi, K., Cheng, Z. Z., El Hajj, O., Perrie, C., and Saleh, R.: A dominant
contribution to light absorption by methanol-insoluble brown carbon produced
in the combustion of biomass fuels typically consumed in wildland fires in
the United States, Environ. Sci. Atmos., 2, 182–191,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ea00065a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ea00065a</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bi, X., Dai, Q., Wu, J., Zhang, Q., Zhang, W., Luo, R., Cheng, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, L., Yu, Z., Zhang, Y., Tian, Y., and Feng, Y.: Characteristics of the main primary source profiles of particulate matter across China from 1987 to 2017, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3223–3243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3223-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3223-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5380–5552,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50171</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cappa, C. D., Lim, C. Y., Hagan, D. H., Coggon, M., Koss, A., Sekimoto, K., de Gouw, J., Onasch, T. B., Warneke, C., and Kroll, J. H.: Biomass-burning-derived particles from a wide variety of fuels – Part 2: Effects of photochemical aging on particle optical and chemical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8511–8532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8511-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8511-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, X., Zhao, B., Zheng, H. T., Wang, S. X., Cai, S. Y., Guo, F. Q., Gui,
P., Huang, G. H., Wu, D., Han, L. C., Xing, J., Man, H. Y., Hu, R. L.,
Liang, C. R., Xu, Q. C., Qiu, X. H., Ding, D., Liu, K. Y., Han, R.,
Robinson, A. L., and Donahue, N. M.: Full-volatility emission framework
corrects missing and underestimated secondary organic aerosol sources, One
Earth, 5, 403–412, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, Q. C., Mu, Z., Song, W. H., Wang, Y. Q., Yang, Z. H., Zhang, L. X.,
and Zhang, Y. L.: Size-resolved characterization of the chromophores in
atmospheric particulate matter from a typical coal-burning city in China, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10546–10563,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031149" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031149</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, X. Y., Ching, J., Wu, F., Matsui, H., Jacobson, M. Z., Zhang, F.,
Wang, Y. Y., Zhang, Z. X., Liu, D. T., Zhu, S. P., Rudich, Y., Shi, Z. B.,
Yoo, H., Jeon, K. J., and Li, W. J.: Locating the missing absorption
enhancement due to multi-core black carbon aerosols, Nat. Commun., 16,
10187, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65079-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65079-2</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y.: Optical properties of carbonaceous aerosols modulated by source
variations of spring haze, Zenodo [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18898994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18898994</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y. and He, K. B.: Northeast China: an emerging hotspot of
atmospheric sciences, Sci. Bull., 71, 64–66,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.06.023</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y., Yu, Q., Liu, J., Cao, X., Zhong, Y., Du, Z., Liang, L., Geng, G., Ma, W., Qi, H., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Dramatic changes in Harbin aerosol during 2018–2020: the roles of open burning policy and secondary aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 15199–15211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15199-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-15199-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cheng, Y., Cao, X., Liu, J., Zhong, Y., Yu, Q., Zhang, Q., and He, K.: Measurement report: Diurnal variations of brown carbon during two distinct seasons in a megacity in northeast China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6241–6253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6241-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6241-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Collaud Coen, M., Weingartner, E., Apituley, A., Ceburnis, D., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Flentje, H., Henzing, J. S., Jennings, S. G., Moerman, M., Petzold, A., Schmid, O., and Baltensperger, U.: Minimizing light absorption measurement artifacts of the Aethalometer: evaluation of five correction algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 457–474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-457-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Decker, Z. C. J., Zarzana, K. J., Coggon, M., Min, K. E., Pollack, I.,
Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Edwards, P., Dubé, W. P., Markovic, M. Z.,
Roberts, J. M., Veres, P. R., Graus, M., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J., Hatch, L.
E., Barsanti, K. C., and Brown, S. S.: Nighttime chemical transformation in
biomass burning plumes: a box model analysis initialized with aircraft
observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 2529–2538,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05359" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05359</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Ruckstuhl, C., Coz, E., Rupakheti, M., Sciare, J., Müller, T., Wiedensohler, A., and Hansen, A. D. A.: The “dual-spot” Aethalometer: an improved measurement of aerosol black carbon with real-time loading compensation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1965–1979, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1965-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Duarte, R. M. B. O., Pio, C. A., and Duarte, A. C.: Spectroscopic study of
the water-soluble organic matter isolated from atmospheric aerosols
collected under different atmospheric conditions, Anal. Chim. Acta, 530,
7–14, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2004.08.049</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferrero, L., Bernardoni, V., Santagostini, L., Cogliati, S., Soldan, F.,
Valentini, S., Massabò, D., Močnik, G., Gregorič, A., Rigler,
M., Prati, P., Bigogno, A., Losi, N., Valli, G., Vecchi, R., and
Bolzacchini, E.: Consistent determination of the heating rate of
light-absorbing aerosol using wavelength- and time-dependent Aethalometer
multiple-scattering correction, Sci. Total Environ., 791, 148277,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148277" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148277</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, C. Y., Heald, C. L., Katich, J. M., Luo, G., and Yu, F. Q.: Remote
aerosol simulated during the Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) campaign and
implications for aerosol lifetime, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127,
e2022JD036524, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD036524</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Geng, G. N., Liu, Y. X., Liu, Y., Liu, S. G., Cheng, J., Yan, L., Wu, N. N.,
Hu, H. W., Tong, D., Zheng, B., Yin, Z. C., He, K. B., and Zhang, Q.:
Efficacy of China's clean air actions to tackle PM<sub>2.5</sub> pollution between
2013 and 2020, Nat. Geosci., 17, 987–994,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01540-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-024-01540-z</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, X. F., Peng, Y., Wei, J., Peng, J. F., Lin, X. Y., Tang, M. X.,
Cheng, Y., Men, Z., Fang, T., Zhang, J. S., He, L. Y., Cao, L. M., Liu, C.,
Zhang, C. C., Mao, H. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Wang, Y.: Microphysical
complexity of black carbon particles restricts their warming potential, One
Earth, 7, 136–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2023.12.004</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karanasiou, A., Diapouli, E., Cavalli, F., Eleftheriadis, K., Viana, M., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., and Reche, C.: On the quantification of atmospheric carbonate carbon by thermal/optical analysis protocols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2409–2419, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2409-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2409-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kumar, N. K., Corbin, J. C., Bruns, E. A., Massabó, D., Slowik, J. G., Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Prati, P., Vlachou, A., Baltensperger, U., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Production of particulate brown carbon during atmospheric aging of residential wood-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17843–17861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lack, D. A. and Langridge, J. M.: On the attribution of black and brown carbon light absorption using the Ångström exponent, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10535–10543, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10535-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D.,
Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D.
R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical
properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
6349–6357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es401043j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es401043j</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laskin, A., Laskin, J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Chemistry of atmospheric
brown carbon, Chem. Rev., 115, 4335–4382,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr5006167</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laskin, A., West, C. P., and Hettiyadura A. P. S.: Molecular insights into
the composition, sources, and aging of atmospheric brown carbon, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 54, 1583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cs00609c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cs00609c</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, J., Bergin, M., Guo, H., King, L., Kotra, N., Edgerton, E., and Weber, R. J.: Size-resolved measurements of brown carbon in water and methanol extracts and estimates of their contribution to ambient fine-particle light absorption, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12389–12404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12389-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, J., Lin, P., Laskin, A., Laskin, J., Kathmann, S. M., Wise, M., Caylor, R., Imholt, F., Selimovic, V., and Shilling, J. E.: Optical properties and aging of light-absorbing secondary organic aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12815–12827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12815-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, S., Aiken, A. C., Gorkowski, K., Dubey, M. K., Cappa, C. D., Williams,
L. R., Herndon, S. C., Massoli, P., Fortner, E. C., Chhabra, P. S., Brooks,
W. A., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J. T., Worsnop, D. R., China, S., Sharma, N.,
Mazzoleni, C., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Liu, D., Allan, J. D., Lee, J. D.,
Fleming, Z. L., Mohr, C., Zotter, P., Szidat, S., and Prévôt, A. S.
H.: Enhanced light absorption by mixed source black and brown carbon
particles in UK winter, Nat. Commun., 6, 8435,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9435</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
MEE (Ministry of Ecology and Environment of China): Ambient air quality
standards (GB 3095-2026),
<a href="https://www.mee.gov.cn/ywgz/fgbz/bz/bzwb/dqhjbh/dqhjzlbz/202602/t20260225_1144419.shtml" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 May 2026), 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mo, Y., Li, J., Zhong, G., Zhu, S., Zhao, S., Tang, J., Jiang, H., Cheng, Z., Tian, C., Chen, Y., and Zhang, G.: The water-insoluble organic carbon in PM<sub>2.5</sub> of typical Chinese urban areas: light-absorbing properties, potential sources, radiative forcing effects, and a possible light-absorbing continuum, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 7755–7772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7755-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-7755-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting ”black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pileci, R. E., Modini, R. L., Bertò, M., Yuan, J., Corbin, J. C., Marinoni, A., Henzing, B., Moerman, M. M., Putaud, J. P., Spindler, G., Wehner, B., Müller, T., Tuch, T., Trentini, A., Zanatta, M., Baltensperger, U., and Gysel-Beer, M.: Comparison of co-located refractory black carbon (rBC) and elemental carbon (EC) mass concentration measurements during field campaigns at several European sites, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1379–1403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1379-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1379-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate
and health effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 44, 7520–7540,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Putaud, J. P., Van Dingenen, R., Alastuey, A., Bauer, H., Birmili, W., Cyrys,
J., Flentje, H., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hansson, H. C., Harrison, R. M.,
Herrmann, H., Hitzenberger, R., Hüglin, C., Jones, A. M., Kasper-Giebl,
A., Kiss, G., Kousa, A., Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., Löschau, G., Maenhaut, W.,
Molnar, A., Moreno, T., Pekkanen, J., Perrino, C., Pitz, M., Puxbaum, H.,
Querol, X., Rodriguez, S., Salma, I., Schwarz, J., Smolik, J., Schneider,
J., Spindler, G., ten Brink, H., Tursic, J., Viana, M., Wiedensohler, A.,
and Raes, F.: A European aerosol phenomenology-3: Physical and chemical
characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside
sites across Europe, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1308–1320, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Putaud, J. P., Cavalli, F., Yttri, K. E., Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Sinha,
B., Venkataraman, C., Ikemori, F., Jaffrezo, J. L., Uzu, G., Moreno, I.,
Krejci, R., Laj, P., Gupta, T., Hu, M., Kim, S. W., Mayol-Bracero, O.,
Quinn, P., Aas, W., Alastuey, A., Andrade, M., Angelucci, M., Anurag, G.,
Beukes, J. P., Bhardwaj, A., Chatterjee, A., Chaudhary, P., Chhangani, A.
K., Conil, S., Degorska, A., Devaliya, S., Dhandapani, A., Duhan, S. S.,
Dumka, U. C., Habib, G., Hamzavi, Z., Haswani, D., Herrmann, H., Holubova,
A., Hueglin, C., Imran, M., Jehangir, A., Kapoor, T. S., Karanasiou, A.,
Khaiwal, R., Kim, J., Kolesa, T., Kozakiewicz, J., Kranjc, I., Laura, J. S.,
Lian, Y., Liu, J. W., Manwani, P., Mardoñez-Balderrama, V., Marticorena,
B., Matsuki, A., Mor, S., Mukherjee, S., Murthy, S., Muthalagu, A., Najar,
T. A., Kumar, R. N., Pandithurai, G., Perez, N., Phairuang, W., Phuleria, H.
C., Poulain, L., Prasad, L., Pullokaran, D., Qadri, A. M., Qureshi, A.,
Ramírez, O., Roy, S., Rüdiger, J., Saikia, B. K., Saikia, P.,
Sauvage, S., Savvides, C., Sharma, R., Singh, T., Singh, G. K., Spoor, R.,
Srivastava, A. K., Raman, R. S., Van Zyl, P. G., Vecchiocattivi, M., Voiron,
C., Xin, J. Y., and Yadav, K.: A worldwide aerosol phenomenology: elemental
and organic carbon in PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>, Atmos. Environ., 358,
121338, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121338" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121338</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Renzi, L., Di Biagio, C., Heuser, J., Zanatta, M., Cazaunau, M., Bergé, A., Pangui, E., Yon, J., Isolabella, T., Massabò, D., Vernocchi, V., Mazzini, M., Vogel, F., Yu, C., Formenti, P., Picquet-Varrault, B., Doussin, J.-F., and Marinoni, A.: The role of size in the multiple scattering correction C for dual-spot aethalometer: a field and laboratory investigation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 1365–1383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1365-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-1365-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Samset, B. H., Myhre, G., Herber, A., Kondo, Y., Li, S.-M., Moteki, N., Koike, M., Oshima, N., Schwarz, J. P., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Berntsen, T. K., Bian, H., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Lamarque, J.-F., Lin, G., Liu, X., Penner, J. E., Schulz, M., Seland, Ø., Skeie, R. B., Stier, P., Takemura, T., Tsigaridis, K., and Zhang, K.: Modelled black carbon radiative forcing and atmospheric lifetime in AeroCom Phase II constrained by aircraft observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12465–12477, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12465-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12465-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sedlacek III, A. J., Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Onasch, T. B., Springston, S. R., and Kleinman, L.: Formation and evolution of tar balls from northwestern US wildfires, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11289–11301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11289-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Snyder, D. C. and Schauer, J. J.: An inter-comparison of two black carbon
aerosol instruments and a semi-continuous elemental carbon instrument in the
urban environment, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 41, 463–474,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701222819" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701222819</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tinorua, S., Denjean, C., Nabat, P., Pont, V., Arnaud, M., Bourrianne, T., Dias Alves, M., and Gardrat, E.: A 2-year intercomparison of three methods for measuring black carbon concentration at a high-altitude research station in Europe, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3897–3915, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3897-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tuccella, P., Di Antonio, L., Di Muzio, A., Colaiuda, V., Lidori, R., Menut,
L., Pitari, G., and Raparelli, E.: Modeling the black and brown carbon
absorption and their radiative impact: the June 2023 intense Canadian boreal
wildfires case study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 130, e2024JD042674,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042674" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD042674</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
van der Velde, I. R., van der Werf, G. R., Houweling, S., Eskes, H. J., Veefkind, J. P., Borsdorff, T., and Aben, I.: Biomass burning combustion efficiency observed from space using measurements of CO and NO<sub>2</sub> by the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 597–616, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-597-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-597-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, Y. Y., Zheng, Z. H., Sun, Y., Yao, Y., Ma, P. L., Zhang, A. X., Zhu,
S. P., Zhang, Z. X., Chen, X. Y., Pang, Y. E., Wang, Q. Y., Che, H. Z.,
Ching, J., and Li, W. J.: Improved representation of black carbon mixing
structures suggests stronger direct radiative heating, One Earth, 8, 101311,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101311" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101311</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber,
R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Baumann, K., Cohen, R. C.,
Draper, D. C., Duffey, K. C., Edgerton, E., Fry, J. L., Hu, W. W., Jimenez,
J. L., Palm, B. B., Romer, P., Stone, E. A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Brown,
S. S.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural
southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weingartner, E., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Streit, N., Bitnar, B., and
Baltensperger, U.: Absorption of light by soot particles: determination of
the absorption coefficient by means of aethalometers, J. Aerosol Sci., 34,
1445–1463, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00359-8</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Winiger, P., Barrett, T. E., Sheesley, R. J., Huang, L., Sharma, S., Barrie,
L. A., Yttri, K. E., Evangeliou, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Klimont, Z.,
Heyes, C., Semiletov, I. P., Dudarev, O. V., Charkin, A., Shakhova, N.,
Holmstrand, H., Andersson, A., and Gustafsson, Ö.: Source apportionment
of circum-Arctic atmospheric black carbon from isotopes and modeling, Sci.
Adv., 5, eaau8052, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau8052</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, X., Cao, F., Haque, M., Fan, M. Y., Zhang, S. C., and Zhang, Y. L.:
Molecular composition and source apportionment of fine organic aerosols in
Northeast China, Atmos. Environ., 239, 117722,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117722" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117722</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xiao, Q. Y., Geng, G. N., Xue, T., Liu, S. G., Cai, C. L., He, K. B., and
Zhang, Q.: Tracking PM<sub>2.5</sub> and O<sub>3</sub> pollution and the related health
burden in China 2013–2020, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 6922–6932,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04548" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04548</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, X. C., Zhang, Y. Z., Liang, R. S., Chen, W., Zhang, P. X., Wang, X.,
Zhou, Y., Cheng, Y., and Liu, J. M.: Wintertime heavy haze episodes in
Northeast China driven by agricultural fire emissions, Environ. Sci. Tech.
Lett., 11, 150–157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00940" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.3c00940</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yus-Díez, J., Bernardoni, V., Močnik, G., Alastuey, A., Ciniglia, D., Ivančič, M., Querol, X., Perez, N., Reche, C., Rigler, M., Vecchi, R., Valentini, S., and Pandolfi, M.: Determination of the multiple-scattering correction factor and its cross-sensitivity to scattering and wavelength dependence for different AE33 Aethalometer filter tapes: a multi-instrumental approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6335–6355, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6335-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yus-Díez, J., Drinovec, L., Alados-Arboledas, L., Titos, G., Bazo, E., Casans, A., Patrón, D., Querol, X., Gonzalez-Romero, A., Perez García-Pando, C., and Močnik, G.: Characterization of filter photometer artifacts in soot and dust measurements – laboratory and ambient experiments using a traceably calibrated aerosol absorption reference, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 3073–3093, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-3073-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, J., Liu, L., Xu, L., Lin, Q., Zhao, H., Wang, Z., Guo, S., Hu, M., Liu, D., Shi, Z., Huang, D., and Li, W.: Exploring wintertime regional haze in northeast China: role of coal and biomass burning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5355–5372, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5355-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5355-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X. L., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S.
H., and Weber, R. J.: Light-absorbing soluble organic aerosol in Los Angeles
and Atlanta: a contrast in secondary organic aerosol, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
38, L21810, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049385</a>, 2011.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhong, Q. R., Schutgens, N., van der Werf, G. R., Takemura, T., van Noije,
T., Mielonen, T., Checa-Garcia, R., Lohmann, U., Kirkevåg, A.,
Olivié, D. J. L., Kokkola, H., Matsui, H., Kipling, Z., Ginoux, P., Le
Sager, P., Rémy, S., Bian, H. S., Chin, M., Zhang, K., Bauer, S. E., and
Tsigaridis, K.: Threefold reduction of modeled uncertainty in direct
radiative effects over biomass burning regions by constraining absorbing
aerosols, Sci. Adv., 9, eadi3568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi3568" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adi3568</a>,
2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
