<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-5713-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Rapid secondary organic aerosol formation at  the air–water interface from methoxyphenols  in wildfire emissions: UVA-driven S(IV)  photooxidation to organosulfates</article-title><alt-title>Rapid secondary organic aerosol formation at the air–water interface from methoxyphenols</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Baohua</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Yuanlong</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-8904</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Wenqing</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6869-3232</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yanchen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3231-0892</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yali</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhai</surname><given-names>Jinghao</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9538-2299</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Yaling</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>Jianhuai</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9063-3260</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Huizhong</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1335-8477</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Chen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-8777</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>Lei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3919-3095</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>Tzung-May</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8556-7326</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Qi</given-names></name>
          <email>dkwzhang@ucdavis.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5203-8778</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Xin</given-names></name>
          <email>yangx@sustech.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9173-1188</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement and Early Warning Technology for Urban Environmental Health Risks, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Southern University of Science  and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Ningbo Institute of Digital Twin, Eastern Institute of Technology, Ningbo 315201, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, United States</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Guangdong Provincial Field Observation and Research Station for Coastal Atmosphere and Climate of the Greater Bay Area, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Qi Zhang (dkwzhang@ucdavis.edu) and Xin Yang (yangx@sustech.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5713</fpage><lpage>5725</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>28</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>November</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Baohua Cai et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e230">Wildfire emissions release large amounts of methoxyphenols, which serve as key precursors of aqueous-phase secondary organic aerosols (SOA). Their transformation is closely coupled with aqueous S(IV) oxidation, jointly driving the formation of sulfate and organosulfates; however, the underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we identify a metal-free, UVA-driven mechanism for sulfate radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) generation at 370 nm, supported by laboratory experiments and quantum chemical calculations. Photolysis of the [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] complex yields a [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] pair; the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical subsequently reacts with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form peroxomonosulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which then oxidizes S(IV) to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These sulfate radicals rapidly oxidize guaiacol, a representative biomass burning phenol, in bulk solution, producing SOA enriched in organosulfates. Microdroplet experiments show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fold rate enhancement due to interfacial effects. Box modeling indicates that this aqueous UVA pathway represents a potentially important and previously underappreciated source of sulfate. This work establishes a photochemical link between S(IV) oxidation and SOA formation, with implications for aerosol composition, oxidative capacity, and climate-relevant processes.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Program</funding-source>
<award-id>KQTD20210811090048025</award-id>
<award-id>KCXFZ20230731093601003</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e392">Wildfires are occurring with increasing frequency, intensifying climate perturbation and exacerbating human health risks (Zhao et al., 2025; Teymoor Seydi et al., 2025). Their emissions, rich in methoxyphenols and other semi-volatile organic compounds, readily partition into cloud and aerosol water, where they undergo rapid transformations that produce substantial amounts of SOA (He et al., 2024; Li et al., 2023a; Liu et al., 2022). These aqueous-phase reactions are not isolated; rather, they are intricately coupled with other atmospheric chemical processes, resulting in complex multiphase chemistry that remains poorly understood.</p>
      <p id="d2e395">Sulfate is a major component of fine particulate matter (PM), with significant impacts on air quality and public health  (Wang et al., 2016; Abbatt et al., 2006). In the atmosphere, sulfate forms primarily through gas-phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation by hydroxyl radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and aqueous-phase oxidation of S(IV) species, such as dissolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in cloud, fog, or aerosol water. The aqueous-phase pathway includes direct oxidation by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Liu et al., 2020), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Hoffmann, 1986; Lan et al., 2011), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Zhang and Chan, 2023; Gao et al., 2022; Liu and Abbatt, 2021); catalytic oxidation mediated by transition metal ions (e.g., Fe and Mn) (Zuo et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2021; Harris et al., 2013; Brandt and van Eldik, 1995); and photocatalytic processes involving humic-like substances (HULIS) in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2024; Pan et al., 2024). Despite extensive research, substantial discrepancies remain between observed sulfate levels and model predictions, indicating missing or poorly characterized pathways (Zheng et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d2e511">Beyond sulfate formation, aqueous S(IV) oxidation can also form organosulfates (OSs) in the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) (Passananti et al., 2016; Duporté et al., 2020; Surratt et al., 2008; Iinuma et al., 2007; Darer et al., 2011; Riva et al., 2015). OSs constitute a substantial fraction (e.g., 5 %–30 %) of the organic mass in atmospheric PM (Shakya and Peltier, 2015; Tolocka, 2012; Hughes et al., 2021; Romero and Oehme, 2005) and provide an important chemical link between sulfur and organic aerosols. As amphiphilic molecules, OSs affect aerosol surface activity and hygroscopicity (Riva et al., 2019), thereby enhancing their potential to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) (Peng et al., 2021). Some OSs are also linked to adverse health outcomes, including oxidative stress and proinflammatory responses in human lung cells (Khan et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e514">The sulfate radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a highly reactive intermediate in aqueous-phase S(IV) oxidation (Rudzinski et al., 2009), capable of rapidly oxidizing a wide variety of VOCs, including aldehydes (Coddens et al., 2018; Tran et al., 2022), olefins (Schindelka et al., 2013; Ren et al., 2021), phenols (Cope et al., 2022), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (Wang et al., 2008). These reactions produce oxidized organics that can subsequently form OSs through acid-catalyzed esterification or radical termination reactions. Solar radiation is a key driver of such radical chemistry, including the generation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (George et al., 2015; Herrmann et al., 2015). For example, in high-ionic-strength aerosol solutions (e.g., 3.7 M ammonium sulfate), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> forms under UVB (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">310</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) irradiation, reaching steady-state concentrations near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M (Cope et al., 2022). While direct photolysis of S(IV) species by UVC radiation can also yield <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cao et al., 2021), UVC is largely absorbed by the stratosphere and thus negligible in the troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e611">Although UVA radiation is the dominant ultraviolet solar band at the Earth's surface, its role in aqueous S(IV) oxidation remains poorly understood. A recent study suggests that UVA light can promote <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation at the air-water interface (Gong et al., 2022), but the mechanisms and broader implications are unclear. To address this gap, we combined laboratory experiments with quantum chemical calculations to investigate a novel, metal-free UVA-induced pathway for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation. Using guaiacol (GUA), a representative biomass burning phenol, as a molecular probe, we tracked radical activity and OSs formation. We also explored how droplet microphysics and interfacial effects enhance this chemistry. Our findings reveal a previously overlooked UVA-driven mechanism for sulfate and OSs formation, with important implications for atmospheric chemistry, air quality, and climate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Materials</title>
      <p id="d2e657">Guaiacol (99 %), sodium sulfite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperinedinyloxy (TEMPO, 98 %), ethanol (99 %), and tert-butanol (99 %) were purchased from Macklin. Zero air is made up of 21 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 79 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. All water used in the experiments was ultrapure Milli-Q water (18.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
      <p id="d2e735">Bulk aqueous experiment. All experiments were performed in a 25 mL airtight Pyrex tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar and a gas inlet tube for feeding high-purity zero air or nitrogen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under 370 nm light or Xenon lamp (300w) irradiation. Based on preliminary experiments, we identified the critical role of UVA irradiation in driving the reaction; therefore, a high-power UVA lamp was employed to ensure sufficient photon flux and to obtain reliable kinetic data (see Supplement, Figs. S1–S4). A 20 mL reaction solution containing guaiacol, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and other reactants was prepared. The pH of the reaction solution was adjusted using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and NaOH and measured with a pH meter REDOX potentiometer Conductivity meter (AZ-86555) that was calibrated with commercial pH standards. In experiments requiring the measurement of total inorganic sulfur, the pH is adjusted with either phosphoric acid or phosphate. Aliquots (3 mL) were sampled every 20 min for 1 h, with 0.30 mL MeOH added immediately to quench the reaction. Each experiment was repeated at least twice.</p>
      <p id="d2e797"><bold>HPLC analysis.</bold> The concentrations of the guaiacol and phenol were determined using an HPLC (Thermo Scientific™ UltiMate™ 3000) equipped with a diode array detector (DAD) and an Agilent 5 TC-C18 column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.60</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The column temperature was maintained at 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the flow rate was set to 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Detection was performed at 274 nm. The mobile phase consisted of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) acetonitrile/water acidified with 0.1 % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA).</p>
      <p id="d2e880"><bold>Direct infusion HRMS.</bold> Reaction solutions were filtered through a membrane and then directly introduced into an Agilent 6546 quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (QTOF-MS, Santa Clara, CA) with electrospray ionization (ESI) source in negative mode. The MS parameters were as follows: nebulizer, 25 psi; gas flow, 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; sheath gas temperature, 330 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; capillary voltage, 3500 V; sheath gas flow, 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. MS data were collected in an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range of 90–500. Agilent MassHunter Qualitative Analysis software (version 10.0) was used for data analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e941"><bold>UV-vis spectroscopy.</bold> An ultraviolet-visible Spectrophotometer (Youke, T2602, Shanghai, China) was used to monitor guaiacol absorbance during reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and to record sample spectra from 200 to 500 nm. The reaction solution was directly loaded without dilution or modification. Spectra of the guaiacol – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction were collected every 20 min for 1 h.</p>
      <p id="d2e979"><bold>IC measurements.</bold> Sulfite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) concentrations were analyzed using a Metrohm 883 Basic IC system quipped with a Metrosep A supply 5-250/4.0 analytical column and a conductivity detector (Liu et al., 2025). Prior to analysis, 2 % isopropanol and 1.0 mM NaOH was added into the reaction solution. The eluent used was 3.2 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/1.0 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaHCO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a flow rate of 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For total inorganic sulfur analysis, samples were pre-oxidized to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using hydrogen peroxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) before IC detection.</p>
      <p id="d2e1096"><bold>FIDI-MS experiment.</bold> The working principle of FIDI-MS (field-induced droplet ionization mass spectrometry) is described as follows (Gong et al., 2022). Droplets approximately 2 mm in diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> volume) were suspended from the tip of a stainless-steel capillary, which was positioned equidistantly between two parallel plate electrodes separated by 6.3 mm apart. The droplets were formed by injecting the analyte solution through the capillary using a syringe pump. The chemical composition and solute concentrations of the suspended droplets were identical to those of the corresponding bulk stock solutions used for droplet generation. The parallel plates were mounted on a translation stage to align the front electrode's aperture with the atmospheric pressure inlet of a Thermo-Fischer LTQ-XL mass spectrometer (Waltham, MA), which was operated under laboratory ambient air conditions at a relative humidity of approximately 50 %. Once the droplets were formed, a 60 s equilibration period was allowed to enable compound diffusion and achieve equilibrium coverage at the air-water interface.</p>
      <p id="d2e1121">Sampling of the suspended droplets was accomplished by applying a high-voltage pulse (3–5 kV, 100 ms duration, variable polarity) to the rear electrode and capillary, with half the voltage simultaneously applied to the rear plate, thereby establishing a uniform electric field. This field induced a dipole in the suspended droplets, causing it to elongate and form a double Taylor cone at both ends, which ejected oppositely charged submicron-sized droplets. These negatively charged droplets passed through the aperture of the front plate and entered the mass spectrometer for gas-phase ion detection. Due to the significant disturbance caused by the ionization droplet interface (IDI) sampling, a new droplet was generated for each measurement. In this study, a negative voltage polarity was applied to the rear plate and capillary to facilitate detection of deprotonated guaiacol ions ([GUA]<sup>−</sup>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1133"><bold>HR-ToF-AMS experiment.</bold> During photochemical experiments, reaction solutions were aerosolized with a constant output atomizer (TSI Inc.) using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the carrier gas. The resulting aerosols were dried with a diffusion dryer and then introduced into a high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS; Aerodyne Research, Inc.) for chemical characterization. Drying allowed evaporation of volatile and semi-volatile species; therefore, the AMS primarily measured the mass concentration and bulk composition of the remaining low-volatility products. The operating principles of AMS have been described previously (Decarlo et al., 2006; Canagaratna et al., 2007). Briefly, the AMS analyzes non-refractory aerosols that vaporize at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under high vacuum via 70 eV electron impact ionization. In this study, the AMS was operated in “V” ion optical mode (mass resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to acquire mass spectra up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 422. The AMS data were processed with the standard AMS toolkits SQUIRREL (v1.67) and PIKA (v1.27), available at <uri>http://cires.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/ToFAMSResources/ToFSoftware/</uri> (last access: 23 April 2026).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Theoretical calculations</title>
      <p id="d2e1203"><bold>DFT and TDDFT calculations.</bold> Geometry optimizations and frequency calculation for all molecular structures (reactants, products, and transition states) were performed using the M06-2X (Zhao and Truhlar, 2007) functional with the ma-TZVP basis set (Zheng et al., 2010), employing the SMD solvation model (Marenich et al., 2009) to simulate aqueous-phase effects in water, as implemented in the Gaussian 16 software package (Frisch et al., 2016). Optimized structures were verified by frequency computations to confirm local minima (zero imaginary frequencies) or transition structures (single imaginary frequency). Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations were performed to ensure that the first-order saddle points found were true transition states (TS) connecting the reactants and the products. Single-point energy calculations and solvation effects were evaluated at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ (Guo et al., 2018; Noga and Bartlett, 1987) level using the SMD solvation model, with geometries optimized at M06-2X/ma-TZVP and zero-point energy (ZPE) correction applied. The calculations were carried out using the ORCA 5.0.3 program package (Neese, 2025). Multiwfn 3.8 (Lu and Chen, 2012) and Shermo 2.4 (Lu and Chen, 2021) were used for further data analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e1208"><bold>Classical MD calculations.</bold> Classical molecular dynamics (MD) calculations were performed using GROMACS 4.5.5 (Hess et al., 2008). In a cubic box with periodic boundary conditions, the system consisted of 1000 SPC/E water molecules and one GUA molecule using the OPLS-AA force field. Electrostatics were treated with the particle-mesh Ewald (PME) method; van der Waals interactions were truncated at 10 Å. A leap-frog integrator was used with a 2 fs timestep, and the trajectories were recorded every 10 steps.</p>
      <p id="d2e1213"><bold>Umbrella Sampling:</bold> To determine the average volume for each system, 10 ns simulations were conducted in the NVT ensemble, where the temperature was set to 300 K using the V-rescale method. The potentials of mean force (PMF) were calculated using the Weighted Histogram Analysis Method (WHAM) calculations, which were performed in one additional 10 ns simulation with initial configurations from the preceding simulations. The GUA moved in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-dimension around their frozen positions under a harmonic restoring force. The force constant was set at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and configurations were recorded every 0.5 ps. Visualization and trajectory analysis were implemented using VMD (Humphrey et al., 1996).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Model calculation</title>
      <p id="d2e1274"><bold>Box model conditions.</bold> Based on the empirically determined apparent photooxidation rate constants of S(IV) under UVA irradiation, the apparent photon efficiency (APE) was calculated (see Supplement). Assuming that the APE remains constant, the apparent rate constants under UVA irradiation corresponding to the AM0 standard solar spectrum (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016) were then derived (derivation details are provided in the Supplement). Sulfate production rates at 271 K were calculated for different aqueous-phase reaction pathways with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, TMIs, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, following Cheng (Cheng et al., 2016), excluding ionic strength effects.</p>
      <p id="d2e1317">The Henry's law constants at 271 K for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 3.521 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.025 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.147</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.319</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Equilibrium constants for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M (Cheng et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e1532"><bold>Scenario Conditions.</bold> “Cloud droplets” scenario: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, liquid water content <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>LWC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e1746">“Beijing haze” scenario: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>LWC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The concentrations of Fe(III) and Mn(II) were assumed to vary with pH (Cheng et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d2e1891">The sulfate formation rate was calculated using the following equation.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather"><mml:math id="M97" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable class="split" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IV</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s1</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>s2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>so2</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IV</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>obs</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>water</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">96</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Photooxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution under 370 nm irradiation</title>
      <p id="d2e2245">To investigate the photodegradation of GUA in sodium sulfite (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) solutions under UVA irradiation, we first examined the photooxidation behavior of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UVA region. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solutions with controlled initial pH were prepared and continuously bubbled with zero air (Fig. S5). At pH 4.0 and 0.5 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sulfite loss in the dark was slow, with an observed rate constant of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S6) (Brandt and van Eldik, 1995). Under UVA irradiation (370 nm), the sulfite loss rate increased nearly tenfold to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as the primary product (Fig. S7). Increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration to 2.0 mM had only a moderate effect, with rate constants averaging (2.41 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.79) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. S8 and S9). In contrast, pH significantly influenced photooxidation kinetics (Fig. S10): the apparent sulfite decay rate increased by nearly 14-fold from pH 4.0 to 7.0, reflecting shifts in dominant S(IV) species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with different photochemical reactivities. These findings demonstrate that UVA light substantially enhances S(IV) oxidation in metal-free systems and that the reaction is strongly pH-dependent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Photodegradation of guaiacol in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution</title>
      <p id="d2e2509">Guaiacol (GUA), a methoxyphenol emitted primarily from biomass burning (4.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> globally) (Liu et al., 2022; Li et al., 2023a), was used as a molecular probe to trace reactive intermediates formed during UVA-driven S(IV) oxidation. Given its Henry's law constant (McFall et al., 2020), up to 40 % of atmospheric GUA can partition into the aqueous phase (Fig. S11), making it a relevant proxy for aqueous-phase organic transformations.</p>
      <p id="d2e2529">At pH 4.0, GUA (0.1 mM) was added to 2.0 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution under continuous zero-air bubbling. GUA remained stable in the dark, with minor losses attributed to evaporation. Under UVA irradiation (370 nm), however, it degraded rapidly following pseudo-first-order kinetics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.023</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. S12a) that is approximately 14 times faster than direct photolysis (Fig. S12b), highlighting the critical role of S(IV)-derived reactive intermediates. Suppressing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> purging significantly reduced GUA degradation (Fig. 1a), confirming the importance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent photochemistry induced by UVA.</p>

      <fig id="F1"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e2610"><bold>(a)</bold> Kinetics of the aqueous-phase reaction between guaiacol and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under different conditions. <bold>(b)</bold> The dependence of the pseudo-first-order rate constant for GUA decay on the concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Error bars represent the standard deviations from independent experiments. Experimental conditions: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>guaiacol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, zero-air bubbling, 370 nm light irradiation, room temperature.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2718">We further investigated how reagent concentrations influence degradation kinetics. At high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : GUA molar ratios (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), GUA degradation followed pseudo-first-order kinetics, with rates increasing linearly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration (Fig. 1b). At lower ratios, deviations from first-order behavior were observed (Fig. S13), suggesting a shift in the limiting reagent or changes in radical propagation dynamics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Formation of organosulfates and steady-state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration</title>
      <p id="d2e2789">Figure S14 presents the kinetics of UVA-irradiated solutions containing 0.1 mM GUA and 0.5 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The apparent oxidation rate constant for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. S15), about three times higher than that without GUA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S7b), indicating that GUA significantly promoted S(IV) oxidation. The concurrent decrease in total inorganic sulfur closely tracked GUA degradation, suggesting that GUA reacted with photochemically generated intermediates to form S-containing organic species, such as organosulfates (OSs).</p>
      <p id="d2e2890">High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was used to identify reaction products. Negative-mode ESI analysis of a solution containing 0.1 mM GUA and 2.0 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at pH 4.0 (Fig. 2a) revealed unreacted GUA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">123.0446</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) along with multiple sulfate ester derivatives: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">188.9858</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">203.0014</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">218.9963</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">234.9912</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These signals indicate OSs formation from GUA reacting with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals photochemically generated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under UVA.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3193">High-resolution mass spectra of reaction products from: <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GUA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under after 30 min of 370 nm irradiation; <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TEMPO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0 min; <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TEMPO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 30 min in the dark; <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TEMPO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 30 min of 370 nm irradiation; and <bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GUA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TEMPO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after 30 min of 370 nm irradiation. Experimental conditions: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>guaiacol</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TEMPO</mml:mtext><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mM, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1, zero-air bubbling, and room temperature. Proposed chemical structures corresponding to the key mass spectral peaks are shown to the right of the spectra.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3405">To verify <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> involvement, we introduced 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperinedinyloxy (TEMPO; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a radical scavenger (Bai et al., 2016). In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TEMPO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system without UVA (Fig. 2b) or after 30 min in the dark (Fig. 2c), only the TEMPO<sup>+</sup> – <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adduct (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">236.0968</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was observed. However, under 370 nm irradiation, new peaks appeared at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">252.0903</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 220.1019, corresponding to the TEMPO-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adduct (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-loss fragment (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 2d), respectively, confirming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generation.</p>
      <p id="d2e3647">Finally, adding TEMPO to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GUA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>UVA system</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2e) eliminated all OS peaks, leaving only signals for the TEMPO-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adduct and its fragment. This demonstrates that TEMPO scavenged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and suppressed GUA-derived OS formation, confirming <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the key intermediate driving the observed OSs production.</p>
      <p id="d2e3726"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can also oxidize water or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form hydroxyl radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Wojnárovits and Takács, 2019), which effectively oxidize GUA in aqueous phase (Yu et al., 2014). To assess the relative contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> versus <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we used ethanol (EtOH) and <italic>tert</italic>-butyl alcohol (<italic>t</italic>BuOH) as radical scavengers: EtOH reacts rapidly with both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), while <italic>t</italic>BuOH reacts primarily with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and only weakly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Liang and Su, 2009). At pH 4.0, adding 0.5 M EtOH significantly suppressed GUA photodegradation, while <italic>t</italic>BuOH had little effect, supporting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the dominant oxidant (Fig. S16).</p>
      <p id="d2e4031">The kinetics of the reaction between GUA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were assessed using a relative rate method with phenol as the reference compound (Fig. S17) (Tran et al., 2022; Liang and Su, 2009). After correcting for direct photodegradation, the results indicate that GUA reacts very rapidly with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an effective rate approaching the diffusion-controlled regime under the experimental conditions. It is important to note that these values represent condition-dependent, relative estimates rather than absolute intrinsic rate constants. Given the uncertainties inherent in the relative rate approach (e.g., reference rate selection, radical distribution, and irradiation heterogeneity), the derived rate should be interpreted as an upper-limit estimate of reactivity. The observed fast kinetics are nevertheless consistent with prior quantum chemical calculations (Li et al., 2023b), supporting the high reactivity of GUA toward sulfate radicals..</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Photochemical pathway of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under UVA irradiation</title>
      <p id="d2e4110">In aqueous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the primary S(IV) species are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominant under the experimental pH range (Fig. S18). At pH 4.0, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> showed nearly no UV-vis absorption above 250 nm (Fig. 3a). Adding 0.1 mM GUA introduced a strong 274 nm peak from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transitions in GUA's aromatic ring. Although initial UVA absorption was minimal, it increased markedly during irradiation, indicating the formation of new light-absorbing products.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e4231"><bold>(a)</bold> UV-vis absorption spectra of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GUA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction solution at different time points. <bold>(b)</bold> Gibbs free energy profiles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 298.15 K) for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction, calculated at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ/SMD(water)//M06-2X/ma-TZVP/SMD(water) level with Zero Point Energy (ZPE) correction, with the inset showing the vertical excitation spectra of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> complex, calculated using TDDFT at the M06-2X/ma-TZVP/SMD(water) level.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e4339">Since 370 nm UVA light (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> eV) lacks sufficient energy to directly excite either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-GUA complex, the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> likely involved photoactivation of intermediate complexes such as [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] or [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>]. Time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations support this, showing that [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] can absorb UVA light (Fig. S19) and subsequently form reactive radicals. This is consistent with previous findings that halide-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> complexes can be photoexcited by UVA to yield radicals like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">X</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cao et al., 2024a, b).</p>
      <p id="d2e4508">Density functional theory (DFT) calculations (Fig. 3b) reveal that electron transfer from the triplet state (T1) of [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is endergonic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and unfavorable without light. TDDFT results indicate that UVA can excite T1 to higher-energy triplet states (T2), enabling this electron transfer. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is oxidized by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which decomposes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> further oxidizes S(IV) species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Mechanism of guaiacol photodegradation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solutions under UVA irradiation</title>
      <p id="d2e4705">The photodegradation of GUA in aqueous <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solution under UVA irradiation proceeds through three major mechanisms, summarized in Table 1:</p>
      <p id="d2e4724"><bold>(1) Formation of sulfur-centered radicals:</bold> Under UVA irradiation, the [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] complex is photoexcited from the triplet state (T<sub>1</sub>) to a higher triplet (T<sub>2</sub>), enabling electron transfer to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the predominant S(IV) species at pH 4.0, it exists in rapid dynamic equilibrium with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is generated via fast dissociation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), ensuring a sufficient concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for complex formation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is rapidly oxidized by molecular <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a high rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e4991"><bold>(2) Oxidation of sulfites to sulfate:</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> re-enters the cycle by reacting with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to regenerate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> protonates to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which continues oxidizing S(IV) species to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also oxidizes S(IV), but more slowly than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S1). Importantly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts approximately 100 times faster with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, leading to a significant acceleration of sulfite photooxidation at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>pH</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dominates (Fig. S7).</p>
      <p id="d2e5320"><bold>(3) Formation of organosulfates:</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reacts with GUA extremely rapidly, much faster than with S(IV) species. This rapid reaction leads to substantial formation of low-volatility organics compounds, including OSs and GUA dimers and derivatives, with a SOA yield of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (Fig. S20). GUA also increases the overall rate of sulfite oxidation by nearly threefold, probably via additional reactive radicals generated during its reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Proposed mechanisms for the GUA-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction are shown in Figs. S21 and S22.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e5389">Reactions and rate constants of GUA photodegradation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solutions (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016; Rudzinski et al., 2009).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">(1) Formation of sulfur radical </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>UVA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">(2) Oxidation of sulfites </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.98 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">(3) Formation of OSs </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>GUA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Products (including OSs)</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Near the aqueous diffusion limit</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Photodegradation of GUA at aqueous interfaces</title>
      <p id="d2e6805">In atmospheric environments, cloud and fog droplets typically range from a few to tens of micrometers in diameter. Within these microdroplets, surface-active solutes often concentrate at the air-water interface, where reactions are accelerated due to surface enrichment and reduced activation energies (Ruiz-Lopez et al., 2020). Classical molecular dynamics (MD) simulations revealed that GUA is energetically favored at the interface, with an interfacial free energy 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than in bulk water (Figs. 4a and S23). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> also shows an interfacial preference, although much smaller (0.17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> difference) (Xie et al., 2024), suggesting that both species are enriched at the interface.</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e6861"><bold>(a)</bold> Free energy profiles for GUA transfer from the gas phase to bulk water, overlaid with water density distribution at air-water interface. <bold>(b)</bold> Kinetics of direct photodegradation of GUA in microdroplets, with and without <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, under UVA irradiation.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e6891">Microdroplets also facilitate gas exchange, boosting [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] complex formation and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production under UVA. Thus, GUA photodegradation is expected to be far greater in microdroplets than in bulk water – potentially by several orders of magnitude.</p>
      <p id="d2e6938">To test this, we used field-induced droplet ionization mass spectrometry (FIDI-MS) (Huang et al., 2018; Gong et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2023) to monitor UVA-induced photodegradation of 0.1 mM GUA in microdroplets, with and without 3.0 mM <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Methods). Figure 4b shows averaged FIDI-MS signals from five droplets, fitted to pseudo-first-order kinetics (Figs. S24 and S25). GUA degraded nearly 200 times faster at the interface than in bulk (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>bulk</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>interface</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). With <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the rate similarly increased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-fold, indicating interfacial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> M, about two orders magnitude higher than in bulk.</p>
      <p id="d2e7095">Overall, these findings demonstrate that phenolic compounds like GUA are enriched and highly reactive at air-water interfaces, where UVA-driven <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formation greatly accelerates photodegradation and OS production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><title>Atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d2e7123">The experimental system used in this study represents a simplified aqueous-phase environment designed to isolate key photochemical processes. Consequently, the derived kinetic parameters should be interpreted as condition-dependent estimates rather than direct quantitative representations of atmospheric reaction rates.</p>
      <p id="d2e7126">When gas-phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dissolves into cloud and fog droplets, it hydrates to form S(IV) species such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and UVA irradiation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be oxidized to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through radical pathways. Based on our experimental measurements, the apparent photon efficiency (APE) of S(IV) oxidation under UVA irradiation was estimated. Using this experimentally derived APE as a constant parameter, we simulated sulfate formation induced by UVA under the AM0 standard solar spectrum, representing an upper-limit estimate of the sulfate production efficiency via this pathway. This efficiency was then compared with sulfate formation driven by conventional atmospheric oxidants, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and transition metal ions (TMIs) (Cheng et al., 2016) (Fig. 5, see Methods). Under “Cloud droplets” conditions (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2016; Herrmann et al., 2015) (Fig. 5a), sulfate formation induced by UVA in the bulk solution was comparable in magnitude to that driven by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Under “Beijing haze” conditions (Cheng et al., 2016), where the photonic flux in the UVA range is reduced to 34 %, UVA-induced sulfate formation remained comparable to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation pathways (Fig. 5b).</p>

      <fig id="F5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e7249">Simulated aqueous-phase sulfate production rates from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation as a function of pH under two atmospheric scenarios: <bold>(a)</bold> “Cloud droplets” scenario with full UVA intensity (AM0 standard). <bold>(b)</bold> “Beijing haze” scenario with 34 % reduced UVA intensity (AM0 standard). Colored lines represent contributions from individual oxidants.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5713/2026/acp-26-5713-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e7276">At the same time, it should be noted that the UVA-driven pathway identified here is not intended to replace or dominate established sulfate formation mechanisms, such as transition metal ion (TMI)-catalyzed oxidation. Rather, it represents a complementary pathway that may contribute to sulfate formation under specific conditions, particularly in aqueous environments where phenolic compounds and UVA irradiation coexist. Therefore, this pathway should be viewed as a complementary and condition-dependent source of sulfate, rather than a dominant process in complex atmospheric systems.</p>
      <p id="d2e7279">In summary, our results reveal a metal-free pathway for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation to sulfate in atmospheric aqueous phases under UVA irradiation. Unlike traditional mechanisms that rely on metal catalysts or high-energy UVB/UVC lights, we show that the [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] complex can initiate sulfate radical production under UVA – wavelengths far more prevalent in the solar spectrum.</p>
      <p id="d2e7319">In the presence of guaiacol – a common phenolic compound from biomass burning, these sulfate radicals drive rapid GUA oxidation, producing low-volatility organic compounds, including organosulfates. Moreover, microdroplet experiments show that GUA photodegradation is dramatically accelerated in small droplets under UVA light due to intensified interfacial chemistry. The high surface-area-to-volume ratio of microdroplets promotes efficient generation of reactive oxidants, particularly sulfate radicals, which accelerate both S(IV) oxidation and organics transformations. Together, these findings uncover a sunlight-accessible, metal-free pathway for sulfate and SOA formation, especially relevant to slightly acidic, sunlit, and water-rich atmospheric environments.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.Sx1" specific-use="unnumbered">
  <title>Limitations and transferability</title>
      <p id="d2e7330">The results presented in this study should be interpreted within the context of the specific experimental and modeling framework employed. The apparent photon efficiency (APE) reported here is defined based on incident photon flux and is not equivalent to a true photochemical quantum yield, which would require quantification of absorbed photons. In addition, the normalization of light intensity is inherently geometry-dependent, reflecting the dual-lamp configuration and spherical reactor used in this work, and may not be directly transferable to other experimental or atmospheric systems. Furthermore, the kinetic parameters and modeled sulfate formation rates are derived under controlled laboratory conditions and should be regarded as condition-dependent estimates. The modeling results presented here are intended to provide sensitivity-based or upper-limit estimates of UVA-driven S(IV) oxidation, rather than definitive quantitative predictions of atmospheric sulfate production. As such, caution should be exercised when extrapolating these findings to complex atmospheric environments.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e7337">The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Supplement of this article.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e7341">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5713-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5713-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e7350">BC, XY, and QZ designed research; BC, YH, WJ, XY, and QZ performed research; BC, YH, WJ, YanL, YaL, JZ, YZ, JY, HS, CW, LZ, TMF, QZ, and XY analyzed data; BC, YH, QZ, and XY wrote the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e7356">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e7362">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e7368">Supported by Center for Computational Science and Engineering at Southern University of Science and Technology. Qi Zhang acknowledges support from the Donald G. Crosby Endowed Chair at the University of California at Davis.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e7373">This work was supported by Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement and Early Warning Technology for Urban Environmental Health Risks (grant no. ZDSYS20220606100604008), Guangdong Provincial Observation and Research Station for Coastal Atmosphere and Climate of the Greater Bay Area (grant no. 2021B1212050024), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (grant nos. KQTD20210811090048025 and KCXFZ20230731093601003).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e7379">This paper was edited by Jason Surratt and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Abbatt, J. P. D., Benz, S., Cziczo, D. J., Kanji, Z., Lohmann, U., and Möhler, O.: Solid Ammonium Sulfate Aerosols as Ice Nuclei: A Pathway for Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 313, 1770–1773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1129726</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bai, C.-B., Wang, N.-X., Lan, X.-W., Wang, Y.-J., Xing, Y., Wen, J.-L., Gao, X.-W., and Zhang, W.: An Unexpected Controlled New Oxidant: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 20163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20163" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep20163</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Brandt, C. and van Eldik, R.: Transition Metal-Catalyzed Oxidation of Sulfur(IV) Oxides. Atmospheric-Relevant Processes and Mechanisms, Chem. Rev., 95, 119–190,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr00033a006</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/mas.20115</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Cao, Y., Qiu, W., Li, J., Jiang, J., and Pang, S.: Review on UV/sulfite process for water and wastewater treatments in the presence or absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sci. Total Environ., 765, 142762,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142762</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cao, Y., Liu, J., Ma, Q., Zhang, C., Zhang, P., Chen, T., Wang, Y., Chu, B., Zhang, X., Francisco, J. S., and He, H.: Photoactivation of Chlorine and Its Catalytic Role in the Formation of Sulfate Aerosols, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 146, 1467–1475,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c10840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.3c10840</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cao, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, J., Ma, Q., Li, S., Liu, J., Li, H., Zhang, P., Chen, T., Wang, Y., Chu, B., Zhang, X., Saiz-Lopez, A., Francisco, J. S., and He, H.: Spontaneous molecular bromine production in sea salt aerosols, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 63, e202409779,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202409779" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/anie.202409779</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Q., He, K., Carmichael, G., Pöschl, U., and Su, H.: Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601530, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1601530</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Coddens, E. M., Huang, L., Wong, C., and Grassian, V. H.: Influence of Glyoxal on the Catalytic Oxidation of S(IV) in Acidic Aqueous Media, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 142–149,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00168</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cope, J. D., Bates, K. H., Tran, L. N., Abellar, K. A., and Nguyen, T. B.: Sulfur radical formation from the tropospheric irradiation of aqueous sulfate aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, e2202857119,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202857119" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.2202857119</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Darer, A. I., Cole-Filipiak, N. C., O'Connor, A. E., and Elrod, M. J.: Formation and stability of atmospherically relevant isoprene-derived organosulfates and organonitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1895–1902,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es103797z</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T., Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd001213</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Duporté, G., Flaud, P. M., Kammer, J., Geneste, E., Augagneur, S., Pangui, E., Lamkaddam, H., Gratien, A., Doussin, J. F., Budzinski, H., Villenave, E., and Perraudin, E.: Experimental Study of the Formation of Organosulfates from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene Oxidation. 2. Time Evolution and Effect of Particle Acidity, J. Phys. Chem. A, 124, 409–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07156</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Frisch, M., Trucks, G., Schlegel, H., Scuseria, G., Robb, M., Cheeseman, J., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G., and Nakatsuji, H.: Gaussian 16, Revision A.03, Gaussian [code], <uri>https://gaussian.com/gaussian16/</uri> (last access: 23 April 2026), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Gao, Y., Zhang, M., Guo, J., and Xu, L.: Impact of the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on regional sulfate concentrations over the North China Plain, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 13, 101337,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apr.2022.101337</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>George, C., Ammann, M., D'Anna, B., Donaldson, D. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.: Heterogeneous photochemistry in the atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 115, 4218–4258,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500648z</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Gong, C., Yuan, X., Xing, D., Zhang, D., Martins-Costa, M. T. C., Anglada, J. M., Ruiz-Lopez, M. F., Francisco, J. S., and Zhang, X.: Fast Sulfate Formation Initiated by the Spin-Forbidden Excitation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the Air-Water Interface, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 22302–22308,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c10830" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.2c10830</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Y., Riplinger, C., Becker, U., Liakos, D. G., Minenkov, Y., Cavallo, L., and Neese, F.: Communication: An improved linear scaling perturbative triples correction for the domain based local pair-natural orbital based singles and doubles coupled cluster method [DLPNO-CCSD(T)], J. Chem. Phys., 148, 011101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.5011798</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Harris, E., Sinha, B., van Pinxteren, D., Tilgner, A., Fomba, K. W., Schneider, J., Roth, A., Gnauk, T., Fahlbusch, B., Mertes, S., Lee, T., Collett, J., Foley, S., Borrmann, S., Hoppe, P., and Herrmann, H.: Enhanced Role of Transition Metal Ion Catalysis During In-Cloud Oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Science, 340, 727–730,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1230911</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Zhao, B., Wang, S., Valorso, R., Chang, X., Yin, D., Feng, B., Camredon, M., Aumont, B., Dearden, A., Jathar, S. H., Shrivastava, M., Jiang, Z., Cappa, C. D., Yee, L. D., Seinfeld, J. H., Hao, J., and Donahue, N. M.: Formation of secondary organic aerosol from wildfire emissions enhanced by long-time ageing, Nat. Geosci., 17, 124–129,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01355-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-023-01355-4</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Herrmann, H., Schaefer, T., Tilgner, A., Styler, S. A., Weller, C., Teich, M., and Otto, T.: Tropospheric aqueous-phase chemistry: kinetics, mechanisms, and its coupling to a changing gas phase, Chem. Rev., 115, 4259–4334,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500447k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500447k</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D., and Lindahl, E.: GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 435–447,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700301q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ct700301q</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, M. R.: On the kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of aquated sulfur dioxide by ozone, Atmos. Environ., 20, 1145–1154,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(86)90147-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(86)90147-2</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Barraza, K. M., Kenseth, C. M., Zhao, R., Wang, C., Beauchamp, J. L., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Probing the OH Oxidation of Pinonic Acid at the Air–Water Interface Using Field-Induced Droplet Ionization Mass Spectrometry (FIDI-MS), J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 6445–6456,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b05353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.8b05353</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Hughes, D. D., Christiansen, M. B., Milani, A., Vermeuel, M. P., Novak, G. A., Alwe, H. D., Dickens, A. F., Pierce, R. B., Millet, D. B., Bertram, T. H., Stanier, C. O., and Stone, E. A.: PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemistry, organosulfates, and secondary organic aerosol during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117939,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117939</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K.: VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J. Mol. Graphics, 14, 33–38,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Iinuma, Y., Müller, C., Berndt, T., Böge, O., Claeys, M., and Herrmann, H.: Evidence for the Existence of Organosulfates from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinene Ozonolysis in Ambient Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6678–6683, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070938t" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es070938t</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Khan, F., Chen, Y., Hartwell, H. J., Yan, J., Lin, Y.-H., Freedman, A., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Lambe, A. T., Turpin, B. J., Gold, A., Ault, A. P., Szmigielski, R., Fry, R. C., and Surratt, J. D.: Heterogeneous Oxidation Products of Fine Particulate Isoprene Epoxydiol-Derived Methyltetrol Sulfates Increase Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Gene Responses in Human Lung Cells, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 36, 1814–1825,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00278</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Lan, Y., Wheeler, S. E., and Houk, K. N.: Extraordinary Difference in Reactivity of Ozone (OOO) and Sulfur Dioxide (OSO): A Theoretical Study, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7, 2104–2111,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200293w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ct200293w</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Li, F., Zhou, S., Du, L., Zhao, J., Hang, J., and Wang, X.: Aqueous-phase chemistry of atmospheric phenolic compounds: A critical review of laboratory studies, Sci. Total Environ., 856, 158895,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158895" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158895</ext-link>, 2023a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Li, M., Duan, P., Huo, Y., Jiang, J., Zhou, Y., Ma, Y., Jin, Z., Mei, Q., Xie, J., and He, M.: The multiple roles of phenols in the degradation of aniline contaminants by sulfate radicals: A combined study of DFT calculations and experiments, J. Hazard. Mater., 443, 130216,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130216" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130216</ext-link>, 2023b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Liang, C. and Su, H.-W.: Identification of Sulfate and Hydroxyl Radicals in Thermally Activated Persulfate, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 5558–5562,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9002848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ie9002848</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Liu, C., Chen, D., and Chen, X.: Atmospheric Reactivity of Methoxyphenols: A Review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 2897–2916,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06535" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.1c06535</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Liu, T. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of sulfur dioxide by nitrogen dioxide accelerated at the interface of deliquesced aerosol particles, Nat. Chem., 13, 1173–1177,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Liu, T., Clegg, S. L., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Fast oxidation of sulfur dioxide by hydrogen peroxide in deliquesced aerosol particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 1354–1359,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916401117" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1916401117</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Li, X., Ge, Q., Fang, X., Wang, T., You, W., Wang, W., Xie, L., Li, K., Gong, K., Yang, L., Wang, R., Wang, J., Wang, L., Ma, M., Huang, T., Fu, H., Chen, J., Dong, X., and Zhang, L.: Carbonate radical ion as a key driver of rapid atmospheric sulfate formation, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 45,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00905-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-025-00905-4</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Lu, T. and Chen, F.: Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer, J. Comput. Chem., 33, 580–592,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jcc.22885</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Lu, T. and Chen, Q.: Shermo: A general code for calculating molecular thermochemistry properties, Comput. Theor. Chem., 1200, 113249, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113249" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113249</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J., and Truhlar, D. G.: Performance of SM6, SM8, and SMD on the SAMPL1 Test Set for the Prediction of Small-Molecule Solvation Free Energies, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 4538–4543,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp809094y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp809094y</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>McFall, A. S., Johnson, A. W., and Anastasio, C.: Air–Water Partitioning of Biomass-Burning Phenols and the Effects of Temperature and Salinity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 3823–3830,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06443" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b06443</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Neese, F.: Software update: the ORCA program system – Version 6.0, WIRes Comput. Mol. Sci.,  15, e70019, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wcms.70019</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Noga, J. and Bartlett, R. J.: The full CCSDT model for molecular electronic structure, J. Chem. Phys., 86, 7041–7050,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.452353</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Pan, Y., Zhang, F., Tan, W., and Feng, X.: New insight into wastewater treatment by activation of sulfite with humic acid under visible light irradiation, Water Res., 258, 121773,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121773" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.watres.2024.121773</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Passananti, M., Kong, L., Shang, J., Dupart, Y., Perrier, S., Chen, J., Donaldson, D. J., and George, C.: Organosulfate Formationthrough the Heterogeneous Reactionof Sulfur Dioxide with Unsaturated Fatty Acids and Long-Chain Alkenes, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 55, 10336–10339,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201605266" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/anie.201605266</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Peng, C., Razafindrambinina, P. N., Malek, K. A., Chen, L., Wang, W., Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Ding, X., Ge, M., Wang, X., Asa-Awuku, A. A., and Tang, M.: Interactions of organosulfates with water vapor under sub- and supersaturated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7135–7148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7135-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-7135-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Ren, H., Sedlak, J. A., and Elrod, M. J.: General Mechanism for Sulfate Radical Addition to Olefinic Volatile Organic Compounds in Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 1456–1465,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05256" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c05256</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Tomaz, S., Cui, T., Lin, Y. H., Perraudin, E., Gold, A., Stone, E. A., Villenave, E., and Surratt, J. D.: Evidence for an unrecognized secondary anthropogenic source of organosulfates and sulfonates: gas-phase oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of sulfate aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 6654–6664,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00836" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b00836</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Riva, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Boyer, H. C., Narayan, S., Yee, L. D., Green, H. S., Cui, T., Zhang, Z., Baumann, K., Fort, M., Edgerton, E., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Rose, C. A., Ribeiro, I. O., Oliveira, R. L., Dos Santos, E. O., Machado, C. M. D., Szopa, S., Zhao, Y., Alves, E. G., de Sa, S. S., Hu, W., Knipping, E. M., Shaw, S. L., Duvoisin Junior, S., de Souza, R. A. F., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J. L., Glasius, M., Goldstein, A. H., Pye, H. O. T., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Vizuete, W., Martin, S. T., Thornton, J. A., Dutcher, C. S., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Increasing Isoprene Epoxydiol-to-Inorganic Sulfate Aerosol Ratio Results in Extensive Conversion of Inorganic Sulfate to Organosulfur Forms: Implications for Aerosol Physicochemical Properties, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8682–8694,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.9b01019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Romero, F. and Oehme, M.: Organosulfates – A New Component of Humic-Like Substances in Atmospheric Aerosols?, J. Atmos. Chem., 52, 283–294,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-0594-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-005-0594-y</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Rudziński, K. J., Gmachowski, L., and Kuznietsova, I.: Reactions of isoprene and sulphoxy radical-anions – a possible source of atmospheric organosulphites and organosulphates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2129–2140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2129-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-2129-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Ruiz-Lopez, M. F., Francisco, J. S., Martins-Costa, M. T. C., and Anglada, J. M.: Molecular reactions at aqueous interfaces, Nat. Rev. Chem., 4, 459–475,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-0203-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41570-020-0203-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Schindelka, J., Iinuma, Y., Hoffmann, D., and Herrmann, H.: Sulfate radical-initiated formation of isoprene-derived organosulfates in atmospheric aerosols, Faraday Discuss., 165, 237–259,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00042g" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3fd00042g</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation> Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, in: 3rd Edn., Wiley, ISBN 9781119221166, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Shakya, K. M. and Peltier, R. E.: Non-sulfate sulfur in fine aerosols across the United States: Insight for organosulfate prevalence, Atmos. Environ., 100, 159–166,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R., Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp802310p</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Teymoor Seydi, S., Abatzoglou, J. T., Jones, M. W., Kolden, C. A., Filippelli, G., Hurteau, M. D., AghaKouchak, A., Luce, C. H., Miao, C., and Sadegh, M.: Increasing global human exposure to wildland fires despite declining burned area, Science, 389, 826–829,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu6408" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.adu6408</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Tolocka, M. P.: Contribution of Organosulfur Compounds to Organic Aerosol Mass, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 7978–7983,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300651v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es300651v</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Tran, L. N., Abellar, K. A., Cope, J. D., and Nguyen, T. B.: Second-Order Kinetic Rate Coefficients for the Aqueous-Phase Sulfate Radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) Oxidation of Some Atmospherically Relevant Organic Compounds, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 6517–6525, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c04964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.2c04964</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Wang, D., Li, Y., Yang, M., and Han, M.: Decomposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric aqueous droplets through sulfate anion radicals: An experimental and theoretical study, Sci. Total Environ., 393, 64–71,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.11.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.11.036</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R. A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.: Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1616540113</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Liu, M., Wang, T., Song, Y., Zhou, L., Cao, J., Hu, J., Tang, G., Chen, Z., Li, Z., Xu, Z., Peng, C., Lian, C., Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Li, W., Zhu, T., Tian, H., and Ge, M.: Sulfate formation is dominated by manganese-catalyzed oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on aerosol surfaces during haze events, Nat. Commun., 12, 1993,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Liu, Y., Wang, T., Ge, Q., Li, K., Liu, J., You, W., Wang, L., Xie, L., Fu, H., Chen, J., and Zhang, L.: Significantly Accelerated Photosensitized Formation of Atmospheric Sulfate at the Air–Water Interface of Microdroplets, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 146, 6580–6590,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c11892" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.3c11892</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wojnárovits, L. and Takács, E.: Rate constants of sulfate radical anion reactions with organic molecules: A review, Chemosphere, 220, 1014–1032, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.156</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Xie, R., Guo, K., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhong, H., Leung, D. Y. C., and Huang, H.: Harnessing air-water interface to generate interfacial ROS for ultrafast environmental remediation, Nat. Commun., 15, 8860,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53289-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-024-53289-z</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Yu, L., Smith, J., Laskin, A., Anastasio, C., Laskin, J., and Zhang, Q.: Chemical characterization of SOA formed from aqueous-phase reactions of phenols with the triplet excited state of carbonyl and hydroxyl radical, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13801–13816, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, D., Wang, J., Chen, H., Gong, C., Xing, D., Liu, Z., Gladich, I., Francisco, J. S., and Zhang, X.: Fast Hydroxyl Radical Generation at the Air-Water Interface of Aerosols Mediated by Water-Soluble PM<sub>2.5</sub> under Ultraviolet A Radiation, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 145, 6462–6470,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00300" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.3c00300</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. and Chan, C. K.: Simultaneous formation of sulfate and nitrate via co-uptake of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by aqueous NaCl droplets: combined effect of nitrate photolysis and chlorine chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6113–6126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023</ext-link>, 2023. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, J., Zheng, B., Ciais, P., Chen, Y., Gasser, T., Canadell, J. G., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Q.: Global warming amplifies wildfire health burden and reshapes inequality, Nature, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09612-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-025-09612-9</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. and Truhlar, D. G.: The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals, Theor. Chem. Acc., 120, 215–241,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2031–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zheng, J., Xu, X., and Truhlar, D. G.: Minimally augmented Karlsruhe basis sets, Theor. Chem. Acc., 128, 295–305,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-010-0846-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00214-010-0846-z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Zuo, Y., Zhan, J., and Wu, T.: Effects of Monochromatic UV-Visible Light and Sunlight on Fe(III)-Catalyzed Oxidation of Dissolved Sulfur Dioxide, J. Atmos. Chem., 50, 195–210,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-2813-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-005-2813-y</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Rapid secondary organic aerosol formation at  the air–water interface from methoxyphenols  in wildfire emissions: UVA-driven S(IV)  photooxidation to organosulfates</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
       Abbatt, J. P. D., Benz, S., Cziczo, D. J., Kanji, Z., Lohmann, U., and Möhler, O.:
Solid Ammonium Sulfate Aerosols as Ice Nuclei: A Pathway for Cirrus Cloud Formation, Science, 313, 1770–1773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Bai, C.-B., Wang, N.-X., Lan, X.-W., Wang, Y.-J., Xing, Y., Wen, J.-L., Gao, X.-W., and Zhang, W.:
An Unexpected Controlled New Oxidant: SO<sub>4</sub><sup>⚫−</sup>, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 20163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20163" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20163</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Brandt, C. and van Eldik, R.:
Transition Metal-Catalyzed Oxidation of Sulfur(IV) Oxides. Atmospheric-Relevant Processes and Mechanisms, Chem. Rev., 95, 119–190,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00033a006</a>, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia, A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20115</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Cao, Y., Qiu, W., Li, J., Jiang, J., and Pang, S.:
Review on UV/sulfite process for water and wastewater treatments in the presence or absence of O<sub>2</sub>, Sci. Total Environ., 765, 142762,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142762</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Cao, Y., Liu, J., Ma, Q., Zhang, C., Zhang, P., Chen, T., Wang, Y., Chu, B., Zhang, X., Francisco, J. S., and He, H.:
Photoactivation of Chlorine and Its Catalytic Role in the Formation of Sulfate Aerosols, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 146, 1467–1475,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c10840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c10840</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Cao, Y., Wang, Z., Liu, J., Ma, Q., Li, S., Liu, J., Li, H., Zhang, P., Chen, T., Wang, Y., Chu, B., Zhang, X., Saiz-Lopez, A., Francisco, J. S., and He, H.:
Spontaneous molecular bromine production in sea salt aerosols, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 63, e202409779,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202409779" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202409779</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Q., He, K., Carmichael, G., Pöschl, U., and Su, H.:
Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601530, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Coddens, E. M., Huang, L., Wong, C., and Grassian, V. H.:
Influence of Glyoxal on the Catalytic Oxidation of S(IV) in Acidic Aqueous Media, ACS Earth Space Chem., 3, 142–149,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00168" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.8b00168</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Cope, J. D., Bates, K. H., Tran, L. N., Abellar, K. A., and Nguyen, T. B.:
Sulfur radical formation from the tropospheric irradiation of aqueous sulfate aerosols, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 119, e2202857119,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202857119" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2202857119</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Darer, A. I., Cole-Filipiak, N. C., O'Connor, A. E., and Elrod, M. J.:
Formation and stability of atmospherically relevant isoprene-derived organosulfates and organonitrates, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45, 1895–1902,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es103797z</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T., Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.:
Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001213" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001213</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Duporté, G., Flaud, P. M., Kammer, J., Geneste, E., Augagneur, S., Pangui, E., Lamkaddam, H., Gratien, A., Doussin, J. F., Budzinski, H., Villenave, E., and Perraudin, E.:
Experimental Study of the Formation of Organosulfates from <i>α</i>-Pinene Oxidation. 2. Time Evolution and Effect of Particle Acidity, J. Phys. Chem. A, 124, 409–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b07156</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frisch, M., Trucks, G., Schlegel, H., Scuseria, G., Robb, M., Cheeseman, J., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G., and Nakatsuji, H.: Gaussian 16, Revision A.03, Gaussian [code], <a href="https://gaussian.com/gaussian16/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 23 April 2026), 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Gao, Y., Zhang, M., Guo, J., and Xu, L.:
Impact of the oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> by NO<sub>2</sub> on regional sulfate concentrations over the North China Plain, Atmos. Pollut. Res., 13, 101337,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101337</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       George, C., Ammann, M., D'Anna, B., Donaldson, D. J., and Nizkorodov, S. A.:
Heterogeneous photochemistry in the atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 115, 4218–4258,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500648z</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Gong, C., Yuan, X., Xing, D., Zhang, D., Martins-Costa, M. T. C., Anglada, J. M., Ruiz-Lopez, M. F., Francisco, J. S., and Zhang, X.:
Fast Sulfate Formation Initiated by the Spin-Forbidden Excitation of SO<sub>2</sub> at the Air-Water Interface, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 144, 22302–22308,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c10830" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c10830</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Guo, Y., Riplinger, C., Becker, U., Liakos, D. G., Minenkov, Y., Cavallo, L., and Neese, F.:
Communication: An improved linear scaling perturbative triples correction for the domain based local pair-natural orbital based singles and doubles coupled cluster method [DLPNO-CCSD(T)], J. Chem. Phys., 148, 011101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011798" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011798</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Harris, E., Sinha, B., van Pinxteren, D., Tilgner, A., Fomba, K. W., Schneider, J., Roth, A., Gnauk, T., Fahlbusch, B., Mertes, S., Lee, T., Collett, J., Foley, S., Borrmann, S., Hoppe, P., and Herrmann, H.:
Enhanced Role of Transition Metal Ion Catalysis During In-Cloud Oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub>, Science, 340, 727–730,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230911" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230911</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       He, Y., Zhao, B., Wang, S., Valorso, R., Chang, X., Yin, D., Feng, B., Camredon, M., Aumont, B., Dearden, A., Jathar, S. H., Shrivastava, M., Jiang, Z., Cappa, C. D., Yee, L. D., Seinfeld, J. H., Hao, J., and Donahue, N. M.:
Formation of secondary organic aerosol from wildfire emissions enhanced by long-time ageing, Nat. Geosci., 17, 124–129,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01355-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-023-01355-4</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Herrmann, H., Schaefer, T., Tilgner, A., Styler, S. A., Weller, C., Teich, M., and Otto, T.:
Tropospheric aqueous-phase chemistry: kinetics, mechanisms, and its coupling to a changing gas phase, Chem. Rev., 115, 4259–4334,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500447k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500447k</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D., and Lindahl, E.:
GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 4, 435–447,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700301q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ct700301q</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Hoffmann, M. R.:
On the kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of aquated sulfur dioxide by ozone, Atmos. Environ., 20, 1145–1154,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(86)90147-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(86)90147-2</a>, 1986.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Huang, Y., Barraza, K. M., Kenseth, C. M., Zhao, R., Wang, C., Beauchamp, J. L., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Probing the OH Oxidation of Pinonic Acid at the Air–Water Interface Using Field-Induced Droplet Ionization Mass Spectrometry (FIDI-MS), J. Phys. Chem. A, 122, 6445–6456,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b05353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b05353</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Hughes, D. D., Christiansen, M. B., Milani, A., Vermeuel, M. P., Novak, G. A., Alwe, H. D., Dickens, A. F., Pierce, R. B., Millet, D. B., Bertram, T. H., Stanier, C. O., and Stone, E. A.:
PM<sub>2.5</sub> chemistry, organosulfates, and secondary organic aerosol during the 2017 Lake Michigan Ozone Study, Atmos. Environ., 244, 117939,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117939</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Humphrey, W., Dalke, A., and Schulten, K.:
VMD: Visual molecular dynamics, J. Mol. Graphics, 14, 33–38,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Iinuma, Y., Müller, C., Berndt, T., Böge, O., Claeys, M., and Herrmann, H.:
Evidence for the Existence of Organosulfates from <i>β</i>-Pinene Ozonolysis in Ambient Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 6678–6683, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es070938t" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es070938t</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Khan, F., Chen, Y., Hartwell, H. J., Yan, J., Lin, Y.-H., Freedman, A., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Lambe, A. T., Turpin, B. J., Gold, A., Ault, A. P., Szmigielski, R., Fry, R. C., and Surratt, J. D.:
Heterogeneous Oxidation Products of Fine Particulate Isoprene Epoxydiol-Derived Methyltetrol Sulfates Increase Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Gene Responses in Human Lung Cells, Chem. Res. Toxicol., 36, 1814–1825,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.3c00278</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Lan, Y., Wheeler, S. E., and Houk, K. N.:
Extraordinary Difference in Reactivity of Ozone (OOO) and Sulfur Dioxide (OSO): A Theoretical Study, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7, 2104–2111,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200293w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ct200293w</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, F., Zhou, S., Du, L., Zhao, J., Hang, J., and Wang, X.:
Aqueous-phase chemistry of atmospheric phenolic compounds: A critical review of laboratory studies, Sci. Total Environ., 856, 158895,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158895" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158895</a>, 2023a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, M., Duan, P., Huo, Y., Jiang, J., Zhou, Y., Ma, Y., Jin, Z., Mei, Q., Xie, J., and He, M.:
The multiple roles of phenols in the degradation of aniline contaminants by sulfate radicals: A combined study of DFT calculations and experiments, J. Hazard. Mater., 443, 130216,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130216" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130216</a>, 2023b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Liang, C. and Su, H.-W.:
Identification of Sulfate and Hydroxyl Radicals in Thermally Activated Persulfate, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48, 5558–5562,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9002848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9002848</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, C., Chen, D., and Chen, X.:
Atmospheric Reactivity of Methoxyphenols: A Review, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 2897–2916,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06535" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c06535</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, T. and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Oxidation of sulfur dioxide by nitrogen dioxide accelerated at the interface of deliquesced aerosol particles, Nat. Chem., 13, 1173–1177,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00777-0</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, T., Clegg, S. L., and Abbatt, J. P. D.:
Fast oxidation of sulfur dioxide by hydrogen peroxide in deliquesced aerosol particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 117, 1354–1359,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916401117" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916401117</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, Y., Li, X., Ge, Q., Fang, X., Wang, T., You, W., Wang, W., Xie, L., Li, K., Gong, K., Yang, L., Wang, R., Wang, J., Wang, L., Ma, M., Huang, T., Fu, H., Chen, J., Dong, X., and Zhang, L.:
Carbonate radical ion as a key driver of rapid atmospheric sulfate formation, npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., 8, 45,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00905-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-025-00905-4</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Lu, T. and Chen, F.:
Multiwfn: A multifunctional wavefunction analyzer, J. Comput. Chem., 33, 580–592,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lu, T. and Chen, Q.: Shermo: A general code for calculating molecular thermochemistry properties, Comput. Theor. Chem., 1200, 113249, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113249" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2021.113249</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
       Marenich, A. V., Cramer, C. J., and Truhlar, D. G.:
Performance of SM6, SM8, and SMD on the SAMPL1 Test Set for the Prediction of Small-Molecule Solvation Free Energies, J. Phys. Chem. B, 113, 4538–4543,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp809094y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp809094y</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       McFall, A. S., Johnson, A. W., and Anastasio, C.:
Air–Water Partitioning of Biomass-Burning Phenols and the Effects of Temperature and Salinity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 3823–3830,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06443" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b06443</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Neese, F.: Software update: the ORCA program system – Version 6.0, WIRes Comput. Mol. Sci.,  15, e70019, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70019</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Noga, J. and Bartlett, R. J.:
The full CCSDT model for molecular electronic structure, J. Chem. Phys., 86, 7041–7050,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452353</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Pan, Y., Zhang, F., Tan, W., and Feng, X.:
New insight into wastewater treatment by activation of sulfite with humic acid under visible light irradiation, Water Res., 258, 121773,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121773" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2024.121773</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Passananti, M., Kong, L., Shang, J., Dupart, Y., Perrier, S., Chen, J., Donaldson, D. J., and George, C.:
Organosulfate Formationthrough the Heterogeneous Reactionof Sulfur Dioxide with Unsaturated Fatty Acids and Long-Chain Alkenes, Angew. Chem. Int. Edit., 55, 10336–10339,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201605266" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201605266</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Peng, C., Razafindrambinina, P. N., Malek, K. A., Chen, L., Wang, W., Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Ding, X., Ge, M., Wang, X., Asa-Awuku, A. A., and Tang, M.:
Interactions of organosulfates with water vapor under sub- and supersaturated conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7135–7148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7135-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7135-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Ren, H., Sedlak, J. A., and Elrod, M. J.:
General Mechanism for Sulfate Radical Addition to Olefinic Volatile Organic Compounds in Secondary Organic Aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 1456–1465,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05256" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05256</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Riva, M., Tomaz, S., Cui, T., Lin, Y. H., Perraudin, E., Gold, A., Stone, E. A., Villenave, E., and Surratt, J. D.:
Evidence for an unrecognized secondary anthropogenic source of organosulfates and sulfonates: gas-phase oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of sulfate aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 6654–6664,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00836" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00836</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riva, M., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., Lei, Z., Olson, N. E., Boyer, H. C., Narayan, S., Yee, L. D., Green, H. S., Cui, T., Zhang, Z., Baumann, K., Fort, M., Edgerton, E., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Rose, C. A., Ribeiro, I. O., Oliveira, R. L., Dos Santos, E. O., Machado, C. M. D., Szopa, S., Zhao, Y., Alves, E. G., de Sa, S. S., Hu, W., Knipping, E. M., Shaw, S. L., Duvoisin Junior, S., de Souza, R. A. F., Palm, B. B., Jimenez, J. L., Glasius, M., Goldstein, A. H., Pye, H. O. T., Gold, A., Turpin, B. J., Vizuete, W., Martin, S. T., Thornton, J. A., Dutcher, C. S., Ault, A. P., and Surratt, J. D.: Increasing Isoprene Epoxydiol-to-Inorganic Sulfate Aerosol Ratio Results in Extensive Conversion of Inorganic Sulfate to Organosulfur Forms: Implications for Aerosol Physicochemical Properties, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 8682–8694,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Romero, F. and Oehme, M.:
Organosulfates – A New Component of Humic-Like Substances in Atmospheric Aerosols?, J. Atmos. Chem., 52, 283–294,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-0594-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-0594-y</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Rudziński, K. J., Gmachowski, L., and Kuznietsova, I.:
Reactions of isoprene and sulphoxy radical-anions – a possible source of atmospheric organosulphites and organosulphates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2129–2140, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2129-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2129-2009</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Ruiz-Lopez, M. F., Francisco, J. S., Martins-Costa, M. T. C., and Anglada, J. M.:
Molecular reactions at aqueous interfaces, Nat. Rev. Chem., 4, 459–475,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-0203-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-0203-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Schindelka, J., Iinuma, Y., Hoffmann, D., and Herrmann, H.:
Sulfate radical-initiated formation of isoprene-derived organosulfates in atmospheric aerosols, Faraday Discuss., 165, 237–259,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00042g" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00042g</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, in: 3rd Edn., Wiley, ISBN 9781119221166, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Shakya, K. M. and Peltier, R. E.:
Non-sulfate sulfur in fine aerosols across the United States: Insight for organosulfate prevalence, Atmos. Environ., 100, 159–166,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.058</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Surratt, J. D., Gómez-González, Y., Chan, A. W. H., Vermeylen, R., Shahgholi, M., Kleindienst, T. E., Edney, E. O., Offenberg, J. H., Lewandowski, M., Jaoui, M., Maenhaut, W., Claeys, M., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.:
Organosulfate Formation in Biogenic Secondary Organic Aerosol, J. Phys. Chem. A, 112, 8345–8378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp802310p</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Teymoor Seydi, S., Abatzoglou, J. T., Jones, M. W., Kolden, C. A., Filippelli, G., Hurteau, M. D., AghaKouchak, A., Luce, C. H., Miao, C., and Sadegh, M.:
Increasing global human exposure to wildland fires despite declining burned area, Science, 389, 826–829,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu6408" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adu6408</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Tolocka, M. P.:
Contribution of Organosulfur Compounds to Organic Aerosol Mass, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 7978–7983,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es300651v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es300651v</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Tran, L. N., Abellar, K. A., Cope, J. D., and Nguyen, T. B.:
Second-Order Kinetic Rate Coefficients for the Aqueous-Phase Sulfate Radical (SO<sub>4</sub><sup>−</sup>) Oxidation of Some Atmospherically Relevant Organic Compounds, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 6517–6525, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c04964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c04964</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, D., Li, Y., Yang, M., and Han, M.:
Decomposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in atmospheric aqueous droplets through sulfate anion radicals: An experimental and theoretical study, Sci. Total Environ., 393, 64–71,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.11.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.11.036</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, G., Zhang, R., Gomez, M. E., Yang, L., Levy Zamora, M., Hu, M., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Guo, S., Meng, J., Li, J., Cheng, C., Hu, T., Ren, Y., Wang, Y., Gao, J., Cao, J., An, Z., Zhou, W., Li, G., Wang, J., Tian, P., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wang, W., Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Zhu, Y., Li, Y., Hu, J., Pan, B., Cai, L., Cheng, Y., Ji, Y., Zhang, F., Rosenfeld, D., Liss, P. S., Duce, R. A., Kolb, C. E., and Molina, M. J.:
Persistent sulfate formation from London Fog to Chinese haze, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 13630–13635,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616540113</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, W., Liu, M., Wang, T., Song, Y., Zhou, L., Cao, J., Hu, J., Tang, G., Chen, Z., Li, Z., Xu, Z., Peng, C., Lian, C., Chen, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, Y., Li, W., Zhu, T., Tian, H., and Ge, M.:
Sulfate formation is dominated by manganese-catalyzed oxidation of SO<sub>2</sub> on aerosol surfaces during haze events, Nat. Commun., 12, 1993,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22091-6</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, W., Liu, Y., Wang, T., Ge, Q., Li, K., Liu, J., You, W., Wang, L., Xie, L., Fu, H., Chen, J., and Zhang, L.:
Significantly Accelerated Photosensitized Formation of Atmospheric Sulfate at the Air–Water Interface of Microdroplets, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 146, 6580–6590,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c11892" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c11892</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Wojnárovits, L. and Takács, E.:
Rate constants of sulfate radical anion reactions with organic molecules: A review, Chemosphere, 220, 1014–1032, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.156</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Xie, R., Guo, K., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhong, H., Leung, D. Y. C., and Huang, H.:
Harnessing air-water interface to generate interfacial ROS for ultrafast environmental remediation, Nat. Commun., 15, 8860,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53289-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-53289-z</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
       Yu, L., Smith, J., Laskin, A., Anastasio, C., Laskin, J., and Zhang, Q.:
Chemical characterization of SOA formed from aqueous-phase reactions of phenols with the triplet excited state of carbonyl and hydroxyl radical, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 13801–13816, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13801-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, D., Wang, J., Chen, H., Gong, C., Xing, D., Liu, Z., Gladich, I., Francisco, J. S., and Zhang, X.:
Fast Hydroxyl Radical Generation at the Air-Water Interface of Aerosols Mediated by Water-Soluble PM<sub>2.5</sub> under Ultraviolet A Radiation, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 145, 6462–6470,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00300" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c00300</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, R. and Chan, C. K.:
Simultaneous formation of sulfate and nitrate via co-uptake of SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> by aqueous NaCl droplets: combined effect of nitrate photolysis and chlorine chemistry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 6113–6126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-6113-2023</a>, 2023.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, J., Zheng, B., Ciais, P., Chen, Y., Gasser, T., Canadell, J. G., Zhang, L., and Zhang, Q.:
Global warming amplifies wildfire health burden and reshapes inequality, Nature, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09612-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-025-09612-9</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, Y. and Truhlar, D. G.:
The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals, Theor. Chem. Acc., 120, 215–241,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
       Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.:
Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2031–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
       Zheng, J., Xu, X., and Truhlar, D. G.:
Minimally augmented Karlsruhe basis sets, Theor. Chem. Acc., 128, 295–305,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-010-0846-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-010-0846-z</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
       Zuo, Y., Zhan, J., and Wu, T.:
Effects of Monochromatic UV-Visible Light and Sunlight on Fe(III)-Catalyzed Oxidation of Dissolved Sulfur Dioxide, J. Atmos. Chem., 50, 195–210,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-2813-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-005-2813-y</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
