<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-5567-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Mechanisms of air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange in the central Baltic Sea</article-title><alt-title>Mechanisms of air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange in the central Baltic Sea</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Dong</surname><given-names>Yuanxu</given-names></name>
          <email>ydong@geomar.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marandino</surname><given-names>Christa A.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Dobashi</surname><given-names>Ryo</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-2611</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Ho</surname><given-names>David T.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0944-6952</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Rehder</surname><given-names>Gregor</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0597-9989</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Bittig</surname><given-names>Henry C.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-3095</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Karnatz</surname><given-names>Josefine</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2649-6546</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Sabbaghzadeh</surname><given-names>Bita</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Czerski</surname><given-names>Helen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9181-0580</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Engel</surname><given-names>Anja</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1042-1955</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Marine Biogeochemistry Research Division, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Physics, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Oceanography, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research Warnemünde, Rostock, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yuanxu Dong (ydong@geomar.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>23</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5567</fpage><lpage>5587</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>6</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Yuanxu Dong et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e217">Air–sea gas exchange regulates the cycling of climate-relevant gases such as carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), yet significant uncertainties remain in its quantification. The gas transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), a key parameter for estimating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux, is usually expressed as a function of wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This approach overlooks the role of fetch and surfactants, which can substantially affect <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, no field study has systematically quantified their combined effects under fetch-limited and surfactant-abundant ocean conditions. To fill this research gap, we conducted air–sea gas exchange studies during a cruise in the central Baltic Sea, a system with high surfactant levels and a short fetch. We report independent determinations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using eddy covariance (EC) and dual-tracer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) techniques, together with direct measurements of natural surfactants and modelled wave parameters. Both methods yield consistent results; however, EC-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocities are, on average, 33 % lower than those reported in previous EC studies in the open ocean. Sea-state-dependent parameterisations indicate that limited fetch reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> by 8 %, while elevated surfactant concentrations may have contributed to the additional 25 % reduction. We developed an updated parameterisation that includes wind stress, sea state, and surfactants. When applied to climatological forcing, it yields a 40 % stronger seasonal cycle (greater oceanic uptake during summer and enhanced outgassing during winter) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in the Baltic Sea than obtained with the conventional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based parameterisation. These findings highlight the need to move beyond <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in parameterising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and estimating regional fluxes, especially when evaluating the potential of marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) in coastal seas.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung</funding-source>
<award-id>Humboldt Research Fellowship for Postdocs</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education</funding-source>
<award-id>UC · AO contribution number: 35</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Vetenskapsrådet</funding-source>
<award-id>n/a</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Uppsala Universitet</funding-source>
<award-id>n/a</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>Leibniz-Institut für Ostseeforschung Warnemünde</funding-source>
<award-id>n/a</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs6">
<funding-source>National Science Foundation</funding-source>
<award-id>OCE-2123997</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e373">The ocean is a major sink of carbon dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emitted by human activities, substantially mitigating climate change (Friedlingstein et al., 2025). Beyond its natural carbon uptake capacity, marine-based carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) has emerged as a climate mitigation approach under ongoing global warming (Doney et al., 2024). Accurate quantification of global ocean carbon flux and the regional mCDR efficiency is essential for climate predictions. Air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux is often estimated using the bulk formula:

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the gas transfer velocity normalized to a Schmidt number (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 660, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in seawater at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The value of the exponent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jähne et al., 1987), and is often assumed to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the ocean environment (Wanninkhof et al., 2009). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> solubilities (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the base of the mass boundary layer and at the air–sea interface are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fugacity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at these locations is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depend on water temperature and salinity (Wanninkhof, 2014; Weiss, 1974). Notably, if both the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are known, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be derived.</p>
      <p id="d2e785">Equation (1) highlights the central role of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the kinetic forcing parameter in air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is directly driven by near-surface turbulence (Garbe et al., 2014). On a global scale, wind forcing has a dominant effect on gas transfer velocity, and other factors, such as friction velocity, waves, and bubbles, are strongly linked with wind speed (Wanninkhof et al., 2009). Thus, the readily available 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutral wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is often used as the sole variable for parameterising <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g., Ho et al., 2006; Nightingale et al., 2000; Wanninkhof, 2014). However, wind is not the only factor driving gas exchange, as other factors not fully linked to wind speed can substantially influence this exchange at regional scales, particularly in the coastal ocean (Upstill-Goddard, 2006). Existing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulations in the Baltic Sea yield controversial results (e.g., Gutiérrez-Loza et al., 2022; Kuss et al., 2004), highlighting the lack of mechanistic understanding of air–sea gas exchange.</p>
      <p id="d2e880">Surfactants are surface-active compounds, molecules, or biomolecules. They are ubiquitous in the ocean and often highly concentrated in coastal waters through biological production and terrestrial inputs (Mustaffa et al., 2020; Sabbaghzadeh et al., 2017; Wurl et al., 2011), suppressing gas exchange by damping surface turbulence and forming an additional diffusion barrier (McKenna and McGillis, 2004; Pereira et al., 2016). In contrast, wave breaking enhances gas transfer, especially for low-soluble gases, by introducing bubbles as an exchange pathway in addition to the interfacial exchange route (Bell et al., 2017; Blomquist et al., 2017; Dong et al., 2025; Woolf, 1997). Wave breaking is strongly impacted by wind fetch (defined as the distance over which wind acts on the water surface), because limited fetch suppresses wave breaking and bubble generation (Fairall et al., 2006; Kunz and Jähne, 2018; Ocampo-Torres and Donelan, 1995; Prytherch and Yelland, 2021; Woolf, 2005). Understanding how these mechanisms influence air–sea gas exchange is essential for regional (coastal) carbon budgets and for developing robust monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) frameworks to support mCDR strategies (e.g., Ho et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e883">The Baltic Sea, with its high summer primary productivity (Schmidt and Schneider, 2011) and limited fetch, provides an ideal natural laboratory for investigating the combined effects of surfactants and fetch on air–sea gas exchange. We therefore conducted a comprehensive gas exchange experiment in the central Baltic Sea to quantify the impact of factors additional to wind speed on gas exchange.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e889">CenBASE cruise tracks and the ship-based eddy covariance (EC) system. Left panel: Cruise tracks in the central Baltic Sea, color-coded by air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fugacity differences (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Middle panel: Research vessel EMB during the CenBASE cruise; a custom-built EC tower is mounted at the bow. Right panel: Instruments mounted on top of the tower, including sonic anemometers, a motion sensor (IMU), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inlet. Additional setup details are provided in Sect. 2.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>CenBASE cruise</title>
      <p id="d2e951">The Central Baltic Air-Sea Exchange Experiment (CenBASE; EMB 295) was conducted in summer 2022, immediately after the phytoplankton bloom season, to capture strong air–sea gas exchange signals (Parard et al., 2016; Bittig et al., 2024). The research cruise on the R/V <italic>Elisabeth Mann Borgese</italic> (EMB) departed from Rostock, Germany, on 2 July and returned on 18 July, with the primary study area located in the Gotland Basin (Fig. 1A).</p>
      <p id="d2e957">Eddy covariance (EC) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux observations (Sect. 2.2) and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dual-tracer experiment (see Appendix A1) were performed simultaneously to determine gas transfer velocities, representing the second successful joint deployment of these two approaches after GasEx-98 (Ho and Wanninkhof, 2016; McGillis et al., 2001). Surfactant samples were collected from both the microlayer and underlying water (see Appendix A2). Wave parameters were extracted from the ERA5 hourly reanalysis data product (0.5° <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5°) (Hersbach et al., 2020) based on the cruise track's spatiotemporal coordinates. Additional measurements included <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, sea surface properties, and meteorological variables to support the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Eddy covariance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux measurements</title>
      <p id="d2e1032">The EC technique allows for direct measurements of air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux using the following equation:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M62" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean molar density of dry air (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mole</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the vertical wind velocity (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dry air mole fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The primes denote the fluctuations from the mean, and the overbar indicates time averaging. Due to the dynamic nature of the marginal sea environment, a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averaging interval was chosen, shorter than the 20–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically used in the open ocean (e.g., Blomquist et al., 2017). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is derived by combining Eqs. (1) and (2). The EC momentum flux is similarly calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the horizontal wind component. The friction velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is then derived as the square root of the momentum flux divided by the air density.</p>
      <p id="d2e1254">Most components of the EC system were mounted on a custom-built tower at the bow of the ship to minimize the flow distortion (Fig. 1B). The tower extended 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the deck, reaching a height of 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above mean sea level (a m.s.l.). A three-dimensional (3D) sonic anemometer (CSAT3B, <italic>Campbell Scientific</italic>) was installed on the starboard arm to measure the wind fluctuations, with a backup unit on the port side (CSAT3). An Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU, <italic>SBG Systems</italic>), housed in a meteorological box at the top of the tower, recorded ship motion. The IMU was positioned 66 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the starboard sonic and 173 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> aft of it. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluctuations were measured using a LI-7200 gas analyzer. The sampled air was dried with a Nafion dryer operating in “reflux” mode (Perma Pure LLC). Air was drawn from the port-side inlet through a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Teflon tube (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>” inner diameter) at a stable flow rate of 33.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which results in turbulent flow within the tube. The 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signal from the sonic anemometer, IMU, and LI-7200 was logged by a datalogger (CR6, <italic>Campbell Scientific</italic>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1370">Data processing and quality control procedures followed those described in Dong et al. (2021). Briefly, motion corrections were applied to the wind (Edson et al., 1998; Miller et al., 2008) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals (Miller et al., 2010) to remove contamination from ship motion. A nitrogen puff test revealed a 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> e-folding response time, which is used to correct the high-frequency attenuation (Blomquist et al., 2014). The time delay (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between the inlet and the gas analyzer was assessed via the maximum covariance method. Flow distortion was minimized by mounting the EC tower arms beyond the ship's hull.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Auxiliary observations</title>
      <p id="d2e1415">The partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in surface water was measured at 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> intervals using the Mobile Equilibrator Sensor System (MESS) paired with two off-axis integrated cavity output laser spectrometers (oa-ICOS, Los Gatos Instruments) (Sabbaghzadeh et al., 2021). Seawater was continuously drawn from the ship's inlet at a depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was measured daily using an air inlet mounted on the ship's foremast at 13.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> These air <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data are compared to the absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured by the EC gas analyzer (LI-7200, LI-COR, Inc.) to generate the 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series of atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Sensor calibration was performed almost daily using standard gases from the Central Analytical Laboratories of the European Integrated Carbon Observation System (ICOS RI). Mean wind measurements were obtained from a sonic anemometer mounted 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the ship's foremast to minimize flow distortion (O'Sullivan et al., 2013). Residual distortion was corrected using the ERA5 reanalysis wind product and nearby station records (see Appendix A3). Atmospheric pressure and temperature at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were recorded by the onboard weather station. Surface seawater temperature and salinity were monitored by the ship's underway system and calibrated against CTD (conductivity, temperature, and depth) casts. A spar buoy equipped with cameras and sensors for temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen was deployed at several stations to characterize upper-ocean bubble and water column dynamics.</p>
      <p id="d2e1588">In addition, EC air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux observations from previous open-ocean cruises (Yang et al., 2022) are also used for comparison with the CenBASE results. Wave parameters were extracted from the ERA5 analysis wave product according to these open-ocean EC cruise tracks (see Yang et al., 2022) and the CenBASE cruise. The COARE model is used to estimate the bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Edson et al., 2013). For the open-ocean scenario, environmental variables from the corresponding cruises are used as inputs to the COARE model (Yang et al., 2022). The environmental parameters observed during the CenBASE cruise are used to estimate the Baltic Sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the COARE model.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1626">Ten <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> averages of environmental variables and air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux. <bold>(A)</bold> Neutral 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red) and wind direction (blue). <bold>(B)</bold> Surface seawater temperature (purple) and air temperature (green). <bold>(C)</bold> Seawater salinity (brown) and sea-level air pressure (light-blue). <bold>(D)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fugacity in surface seawater (red) and atmosphere (yellow), and their difference (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, black). <bold>(E)</bold> Surface microlayer surfactant activity (SA, light green squares) and significant wave height extracted from ERA5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red); <bold>(F)</bold> Bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates (blue, based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation from Ho et al., 2006) and EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux observations (orange). The dual-tracer tracing period is indicated by the light gray shading. Data are missing from 12–14 July due to a medical event and a temporary shortage of liquid nitrogen, which required the vessel to leave the primary study area.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Environmental variables and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux</title>
      <p id="d2e1795">During CenBASE, winds predominantly originated from the west to north sector (Fig. 2A), with an effective fetch of approximately 50–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the main study area (Fig. A1, Appendix). The wind speed ranged from 1 to 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2A). Water depth across the central Baltic Sea study site ranged from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 to 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Surface water was generally warmer than the overlying air (Fig. 2B), resulting in an unstable boundary layer. Surface salinity remained consistent at approximately 7.3 throughout the study region (Fig. 2C). The cruise took place shortly after a summer phytoplankton bloom, resulting in remarkably low sea surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 120 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 2D). Atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remained constant at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 403 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, creating a strong air–sea gradient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>280 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on average; Fig. 2D) that generated strong ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake signals.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1948">Friction velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and inverse wave age in the Baltic Sea (CenBASE) and open ocean. <bold>(A)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from EC air–sea momentum fluxes versus 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> neutral wind speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Blue dots: 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations during CenBASE (568 points), with red points corresponding to bin averages (per 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Red line: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated by COARE3.6 using the Baltic Sea environmental data; Black-dashed line: COARE3.6 simulations in the open ocean. <bold>(B)</bold> Inverse wave age (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Baltic Sea (red dots) and open ocean (black squares). Error bars denote <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard deviation (SD) of bin averages. The hourly wave parameters are shown in Fig. A2 of the Appendix.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2084">Surface microlayer surfactant activity (SA), expressed as Triton-X-100 equivalents, was relatively constant at 0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2E), significantly higher than typical open-ocean values (0.1–0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Mustaffa et al., 2020; Sabbaghzadeh et al., 2017). Modeled significant wave height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) remained below 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2E), lower than expected for comparable wind speeds in the open ocean (Fig. A2). Bulk <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes estimated from the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an open-ocean dual-tracer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation (Ho et al., 2006) were higher than observed EC fluxes under high wind speeds and lower than observed EC fluxes under low wind speeds (Figs. 2F and A3). During the tracer-tracking period (8–14 July), frequent ship heading changes reduced EC flux quality, leading to most valid EC measurements being obtained from outside this period (Fig. 2F, light-gray shading). Nevertheless, as both EC and dual-tracer were collected in the same study area, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from both methods can be reasonably considered simultaneous measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Friction velocity</title>
      <p id="d2e2201">The friction velocity is a key parameter characterizing near-surface turbulence. Observed values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from EC momentum fluxes during CenBASE were 10 % higher than modelled open ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the same wind speeds (Fig. 3A), likely reflecting fetch-related differences. The wave field in the central Baltic Sea is much younger than in the open ocean, with wave age <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % lower at the same wind speed (Fig. 3B). The waves are shorter and steeper than in the open ocean (Fig. A2). This wave field enhances sea surface roughness and elevates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the open sea. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predicted by the COARE3.6 model, when forced with observed environmental and extracted wave parameters during CenBASE, broadly agrees with measurements (Fig. 3A). This suggests that the COARE model remains applicable in fetch-limited marine environments when wave information is included, despite being developed primarily from open-ocean observations (Edson et al., 2013). Given that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an indicator of surface wind-induced turbulence, this elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is expected to enhance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity (see Sect. 3.4).</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2291">Gas transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the central Baltic Sea during the CenBASE cruise. <bold>(A)</bold> Relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(B)</bold> Relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Blue dots in both panels represent 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">301</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with red dots denoting bin averages (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins or 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bins) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Red lines indicate the fit to the bins, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.48 for the fit with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.59 for the fit with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Yellow diamonds show dual-tracer (DT) transfer velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured concurrently with EC. The orange line in panel <bold>(A)</bold> denotes the open ocean DT-based parameterisation from Ho et al. (2006). The black lines in panels <bold>(A)</bold> and <bold>(B)</bold> correspond to the open-ocean EC-based parameterisations of Yang et al. (2022; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent) and Yang et al. (2024; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and sea-state dependent), respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Gas transfer velocities from EC and DT</title>
      <p id="d2e2597">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was derived from EC air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations using Eq. (1). After quality control, 301 valid 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data points were retained (Fig. 4). The large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">|</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 280 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ensured accurate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derivations, with hourly uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % (Fig. A4), substantially lower than typical cruise-based uncertainties (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % during the HiWinGS cruise; Blomquist et al., 2017). The cool skin correction (reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Woolf et al., 2016) is negligible relative to the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and was therefore ignored. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the DT experiment is summarized in Appendix A1.</p>
      <p id="d2e2819">The EC dataset offers high temporal resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), enabling investigation of small-scale processes influencing gas exchange. The EC observations span a broad range of wind speeds (1 to 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. 4A), providing a robust constraint of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under low-to-moderate wind conditions. In contrast, DT-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents daily averages, in which short-term extremes (i.e., low and high wind conditions) are smoothed, resulting in seven observations concentrated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 5–9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 4A). Within this wind range, DT-and EC-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are in good agreement, with the former on average being only slightly (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 %) lower than the latter (Fig. 4).</p>
      <p id="d2e2935">DT-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values during CenBASE also generally agree with the open-ocean DT-based parameterisation of Ho et al. (2006) under equivalent wind speeds (orange dashed line in Fig. 4A), with the former on average being only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 % lower than the latter. However, EC-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values deviate systematically from this open-ocean relationship (Ho et al., 2006), being higher at low wind speeds (1–7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 %) and lower at high wind speeds (7–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 %) (Fig. 4A). This divergence does not contradict the agreement between the DT-and EC-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, as this agreement falls within the 5–9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range (where the DT data concentrate). Fitting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reveals a weaker wind speed dependence than the open ocean DT-based parameterisation (Fig. 4A). It is worth noting that including a constant term in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fitting function (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.48) improves the fit compared to a purely power-law form (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.42) (Fig. A5), suggesting a non-zero <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under calm conditions. This is unsurprising, since the chemical enhancement (Cole and Caraco, 1998; Fairall et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2022) and likely buoyancy flux sustain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer at low wind speeds (McGillis et al., 2004; Wanninkhof et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d2e3277">Notably, the DT data collected during CenBASE provide only limited constraints at wind speeds below 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and above 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship derived from these data is sensitive to the chosen functional form (Fig. A5). Moreover, the DT-based open-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimates are lower than the EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based estimates across the wind speed range observed during CenBASE (Fig. 4A), likely reflecting differences in methodology. Because the CenBASE DT data are interpreted elsewhere (Dobashi et al., 2026), and, more importantly, because the EC measurements resolve finer-scale processes and ensure methodological consistency, the subsequent section focuses on comparing EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations in the Baltic Sea with those in the open ocean.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Suppression of air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange</title>
      <p id="d2e3393">The EC-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during CenBASE was generally lower than open-ocean EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocities (Yang et al., 2022; 2024) (Fig. 4A and B), indicating a substantial suppression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange in the Baltic Sea. To explain this reduction, we partition the total gas transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) into interfacial (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and bubble-mediated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) components (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is primarily driven by wind stress or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on both the wind forcing and sea state. A machine-learning analysis of 15 open ocean datasets identified significant wave height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, including both windsea and swell) as a key proxy for sea state that strongly affects <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yang et al., 2024). Based on this analysis, Yang et al. (2024) express the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as (Fig. 4B, black line):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M251" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on solubility, normalizing it using the Schmidt number (i.e., converting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) may not be strictly appropriate. However, the sensitivities of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are nearly identical (see Fig. A1 in Dong et al., 2025). Therefore, normalization using either <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> produces almost the same gas transfer velocities. For simplicity and consistency, we adopt the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Sc</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based normalization in this study.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3757">Comparison of significant wave height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the Baltic Sea and the open ocean. <bold>(A)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Baltic Sea during CenBASE (red dots) and in the open ocean (black squares), with error bars representing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The data are extracted from ERA5 according to the EC cruise tracks (Yang et al., 2022) and the CenBASE cruise track. <bold>(B)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations in the Baltic Sea during CenBASE (red dots, the same as the red dots in Fig. 4B) and in the open ocean (black squares, Yang et al., 2022). The black and red solid lines correspond to the parameterised total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Eq. 3; Yang et al., 2024) using the open ocean and the Baltic Sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The black and red dashed lines denote the parameterised bubble-mediated transfer component (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eq. 3) using the open ocean and the Baltic Sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e3922">Comparison of mean gas transfer velocities between measurements in the Baltic Sea and estimates using the open ocean parameterisation from Yang et al. (2024) under identical wind speed conditions (Eq. 3). The percentages in parentheses in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> columns indicate the relative difference between the Baltic Sea and the open ocean. The last column is the uncertainty assessment of the values in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> column with the values in parentheses representing the relative uncertainties. The positive (negative) sign represents the enhancement (suppression).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Uncertainty (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Open ocean (model) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">15.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Impact factors (model)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Fetch</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>57 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3">Surfactants </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Unsure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Unsure</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 5.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 107 %)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Baltic Sea (CenBASE, EC) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">14.9 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33 %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4400">The observed EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during CenBASE averaged 14.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To compare this value with open-ocean conditions at equivalent wind speeds, we apply the wind-speed observations from the CenBASE cruise (i.e., wind speed values shown in Fig. 4A) to Eq. (3) to estimate open-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, yielding average values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 22.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This means that the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during CenBASE was 33 % (7.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) lower than the open-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimate.</p>
      <p id="d2e4594">Equation (3) implies a linear dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Regression of the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indeed yields an approximately linear relationship (Fig. 4B), consistent with prior findings at low-to-moderate winds (Landwehr et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2022). Additionally, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.59) outperforms the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.48), confirming that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> better captures variability in gas transfer velocity than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jähne et al., 1987; Landwehr et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2022). As shown in Fig. 3A, the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during CenBASE was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % higher than open-ocean values under equivalent wind speeds, implying a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % enhancement in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to fetch-related increases in shear stress (Vickers and Mahrt, 1997). It is important to note that the observed 33 % reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> includes this enhancement, suggesting that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange was suppressed even more, by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 43 % (9.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) relative to open-ocean conditions.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e4890">Surfactant-induced suppression fraction on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from this study and previous work. <bold>(A)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of surfactant concentration under low-moderate wind speeds. The blue circle shows the mean constrained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from this study; horizontal and vertical error bars denote the standard deviation of observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the associated uncertainty of the constrained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Red squares indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from wave-tank experiments with natural Atlantic seawater at wind speeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pereira et al., 2018), with the red line showing the linear fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Orange pluses show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constrained from field <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations using the chamber technique with natural surfactant (Mustaffa et al., 2020). Diamonds (filled/unfilled) and the grey dash represent wave-tank studies using artificial soluble surfactants (Mesarchaki et al., 2015; Ribas-Ribas et al., 2018; Bock et al., 1999). <bold>(B)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Blue circles show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constrained from the residual suppression of observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from this study, with error bars indicating uncertainties. The blue line corresponds to the fit based on the blue circles (0.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.65). Red squares represent values derived from an EC-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity study (Yang et al., 2021). Orange pluses denote the Mustaffa et al. (2020) dataset with surfactant concentrations of 0.2–0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Green triangles show <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> inferred from EC-based DMS and DT exchange experiments in artificial insoluble surfactant patches (Salter et al., 2011). Purple diamonds represent Mesarchaki et al. (2015), who used <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of artificial soluble surfactant. Yellow crosses indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from coastal heat transfer measurements (Frew et al., 2004). The grey dashed line shows laboratory experiments with artificial soluble surfactants at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Bock et al., 1999).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e5222">According to Eq. (3), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is linearly dependent on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to the limited fetch, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during CenBASE was 57 % lower than in the open ocean at the equivalent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5A, Table 1), and this reduction is expected to cause a comparable decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using the extracted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from ERA5 for CenBASE, the parameterised <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases on average from 7.0 to 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to an 18 % suppression on the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5B; Table 1), explaining about half of the observed suppression during CenBASE.</p>
      <p id="d2e5344">Surfactants inhibit both interfacial (e.g., Frew, 1997) and bubble-mediated gas exchange (e.g., Woolf, 1993), and their concentrations in the Baltic Sea are substantially higher than in the open ocean. We assume that all residual suppression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during CenBASE, which cannot be explained by fetch effects, is caused by surfactants. Under this assumption, the residual 25 % suppression (i.e., 5.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Fig. 5B and Table 1) reflects the impact of elevated surfactant levels. This effect is not captured by the Yang et al. (2024) parameterisation, which is based primarily on open-ocean observations characterized by low surfactant concentrations (Wurl et al., 2011; Fig. A6).</p>
      <p id="d2e5384">The resulting suppression fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is consistent in magnitude with previous field-based estimates (Fig. 6; Mustaffa et al., 2020; Salter et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2021) within uncertainty (see Sect. 3.5). The constrained <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is generally smaller than laboratory-derived values (Fig. 6A), likely due to challenges in extrapolating laboratory conditions to the field. Notably, previous studies report conflicting relationships between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and surfactant concentration. Some show increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing concentration (Mesarchaki et al., 2015; Pereira et al., 2018; Ribas-Ribas et al., 2018), whereas others identify a threshold concentration above which <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows little change (Mustaffa et al., 2020; Schmidt and Schneider, 2011) (Fig. 6A). Because surfactant concentrations were nearly constant during CenBASE, we cannot assess this relationship here.</p>
      <p id="d2e5427">Several studies also show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases with wind speed (Fig. 6B; Bock et al., 1999; Mesarchaki et al., 2015; Salter et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2021), and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> constrained here aligns well with these findings, especially those from field observations. Fitting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields a correction factor (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that can be applied to Eq. (3) to account for surfactant effects, generating the updated parameterisation:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M395" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          This parameterisation reflects conditions during CenBASE, where the surfactant concentration was relatively stable at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. If a SA concentration-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is needed, one option is the published linear relationship <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.025</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pereira et al., 2018). However, this formulation maybe physically inconsistent because it predicts a non-zero suppression even when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> should theoretically approach zero in surfactant-free conditions. To address this, we re-evaluated the same dataset used in the original study (Pereira et al., 2018) and fitted a proportional relationship that passes through the origin: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The goodness-of-fit (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.49) is only marginally lower than the original relationship (0.51, Pereira et al., 2018), indicating that the proportional form captures the data nearly as well while remaining physically realistic. For the mean CenBASE surfactant concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), this relationship yields <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.21. Applying this SA-dependent suppression to the wind-dependent correction in Eq. (4) results in the combined parameterisation:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M410" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Previous studies have suggested that water-side convection may influence gas exchange in both open-ocean (McGillis et al., 2004) and Baltic conditions (Rutgersson and Smedman, 2010). During CenBASE, a small spar buoy recorded oxygen, temperature, and salinity at depths of 1.2 and 2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Dissolved oxygen exhibited small-scale variability with similar patterns at both depths (Fig. A7), indicating coherent near-surface structure over 5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scales, likely driven by wind-induced turbulence intermittently exposing surface patches to the atmosphere. In contrast, no corresponding variability was observed in temperature or salinity (Fig. A7), suggesting that convection played a negligible role in gas exchange under the observed conditions. This supports our assumption that the deviation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the Baltic Sea and the open ocean can be fully attributed to the combined effects of limited fetch and elevated surfactant levels.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Uncertainty analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e5819">The quantification results shown above are not free from uncertainty. First, we use the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship for the bubble component, which fits best with the EC-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations (Yang et al., 2024). However, alternative formulations have been proposed, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Deike and Melville, 2018) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Brumer et al., 2017a; Fairall et al., 2022). These different exponents indicate that the relative contributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to gas exchange may vary slightly, introducing parameterisation uncertainty. Yang et al. (2024) reported that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the fit (i.e., Eq. 3) is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75, indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % of the variance in the observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> remains unexplained by the parameterisation. We therefore assign a 25 % uncertainty to the parameterisation given in Eq. (3). This uncertainty propagates through the suppression estimates. For instance, the uncertainty in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement estimate is approximately 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 %). The suppression analysis uses <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data derived from ERA5 reanalysis, which likely carries an uncertainty of about 30 % in the Baltic Sea (Giudici et al., 2023). Consequently, the uncertainty in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-related suppression estimate is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The uncertainty associated with the surfactant-related suppression is substantially larger because it is not directly determined but inferred as a residual after accounting for other components. Combining the propagated uncertainties from the parameterised total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and from two fetch-induced suppression estimates yields an uncertainty of 5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to approximately 110 % of the estimated suppression value (Table 1).</p>
      <p id="d2e6219">Furthermore, it is worth noting that the two corrections in Eq. (5) (i.e., the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correction and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correction) are implicitly assumed to be independent. However, potential interactions between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> influence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may introduce additional uncertainty into Eq. (5).</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e6295">Climatological seasonal variations of environmental variables and gas transfer velocities in the Baltic Sea. <bold>(A)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red; Bittig et al., 2024). <bold>(B)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (blue) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are averaged from the ERA5 monthly reanalysis data product (Hersbach et al., 2020) for 1998–2018. <bold>(C)</bold> Surfactant concentrations scaled from monthly chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Pitarch et al., 2016) and surfactant-induced suppression fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent parameterisation (Eq. 5). <bold>(D)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> estimated from different parameterisations: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based (blue; Ho et al., 2006), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based (red solid; Eq. 3, Yang et al., 2024); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based (red dashed; Eq. 5).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Implications for Baltic Sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates</title>
      <p id="d2e6548">The CenBASE cruise took place during the summer bloom (July), when chlorophyll <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is high (Pitarch et al., 2016) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongly reduced by primary productivity (e.g., Parard et al., 2016; Bittig et al., 2024). To upscale these results, we adopt a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product from Bittig et al. (2024) to examine how fetch and surfactants shape the climatological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux of the Baltic Sea. This climatological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product is derived by combining observations and model patterns. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink in summer and a source in winter (Fig. 7A). However, weaker summer winds and stronger winter winds suggest that the magnitudes of uptake and outgassing may be similar. Seasonal cycles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> closely follow wind speed (Fig. 7B), while Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> peaks during the spring-summer bloom and remains low in winter (Fig. 7C). We estimate monthly surfactant concentrations by scaling the July CenBASE value (0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with monthly Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations following the idea of Wurl et al. (2011) and using the formula 0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>/Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mtext>July</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Equation (5) is then used to compute the corresponding suppression of gas transfer, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.25</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sf</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reflects the seasonal Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> cycle and modulations by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % suppression in summer and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % in winter (Fig. 7C). However, surfactant concentrations are not solely determined by Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; for example, humic acids also act as surfactants (e.g., Klavins and Purmalis, 2010), and the Baltic Sea is known for elevated humic acid levels due to significant terrestrial inputs (Hammer et al., 2017). Therefore, estimating surfactant levels solely from Chl <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has inherent limitations.</p>
      <p id="d2e6849">We estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using three parameterisation schemes: the conventional open ocean DT-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulation (Ho et al., 2006), the open ocean EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulation (Eq. 3; Yang et al., 2024), and the Baltic Sea EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulation (Eq. 5). Although all these schemes reproduce similar seasonal patterns, their magnitudes differ (Fig. 7D), reflecting sea state and surfactant effects as well as methodological differences. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation yields lower values than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scheme because it incorporates surfactant-induced suppression from the surfactant. This suppression is especially strong in summer when SA concentrations are highest, leading to the largest discrepancies between the estimated climatological <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> schemes. As shown in Sect. 3.4, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during CenBASE has been reduced by 33 %. Notably, this reduction is relative to open-ocean EC-based estimates. However, compared with the open ocean DT-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulation, however, this reduction occurs only at wind speeds above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At lower wind speeds, the EC-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations during CenBASE exceed the DT-based estimates (Fig. 4A). Because climatological Baltic Sea wind speeds are typically below 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Spring, Summer, and Autumn (Fig. 7A), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation produces higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulation in these seasons. In winter, despite higher wind speeds, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scheme still exceeds the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based estimates due to modulation of the surfactants. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration in winter is estimated to be three times lower than during the summer CenBASE cruise (Fig. 7C), resulting in much weaker suppression.</p>
      <p id="d2e7256">Overall, relative to the conventional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> formulation (Ho et al., 2006), the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all seasons, enhancing both summer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uptake by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 % and winter outgassing by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 %, and amplifying the seasonal cycle by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %. These opposing seasonal effects are expected to largely compensate, resulting in only a modest change in the annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e7367">A robust understanding of air–sea gas exchange mechanisms is fundamental for accurately quantifying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, which is essential for accurate carbon budgets and climate projections. Most previous studies have focused on the open ocean, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is typically parameterised as a function of wind speed. In contrast, marginal seas such as the Baltic Sea exhibit more complex dynamics due to limited fetch and abundant surfactants, which modulate the wind speed dependence of gas exchange. To investigate these processes, a dedicated experiment was conducted in the central Baltic Sea during the CenBASE cruise, employing two commonly used techniques: eddy covariance and dual-tracer methods. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from both techniques agrees well, confirming the reliability of both methods for gas transfer velocity observations. The observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity shows a significant reduction compared to the open-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations and parameterisations under comparable wind conditions (Yang et al., 2024; Fig. 4). This reduction can be attributed to three competing processes (summarized in Fig. 8): (1) a 10 % enhancement from fetch-limited increases in friction velocity, (2) an 18 % suppression from reduced significant wave height, and (3) a 25 % suppression from elevated surfactant concentrations. Together, these effects explain the overall 33 % reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange during CenBASE relative to the EC-based open ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e7459">Schematic illustrating how fetch and surfactants modulate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Baltic Sea relative to the open ocean. Values denote the relative magnitude of enhancement (+) or suppression (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each process (Table 1). Black arrows and their associated values indicate the effect of fetch on individual gas exchange components, while the blue value on the dashed arrow shows the net fetch effect on total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The red value and arrow represent the constrained surfactant-induced suppression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e7507">During CenBASE, fetch lengths ranged from 50–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in contrast to more than 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the open ocean. The limited fetch exerts both enhancing and suppressing effects on gas exchange in the Baltic Sea (Fig. 8). Shorter fetch produces a younger wave field dominated by shorter and steeper waves, increasing surface roughness and thereby enhancing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At the same time, limited fetch constrains wave development, leading to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 % reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 5A). As a key proxy for wave-breaking intensity (Brumer et al., 2017b; Deike, 2021; Zhao et al., 2003), reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diminishes wave breaking and consequently suppresses bubble-mediated gas transfer (Dobashi and Ho, 2023; Fairall et al., 2006; Ocampo-Torres and Donelan, 1995; Woolf, 2005). These findings emphasize the need to incorporate sea-state dependence into <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisations (Brumer et al., 2017a; Deike and Melville, 2018; Fairall et al., 2022; Yang et al., 2024). When direct wave observations are unavailable, reanalysis products (e.g., ERA5; Hersbach et al., 2020) can serve as a first-order estimate of wave conditions for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> evaluation (Bessonova et al., 2025; Giudici et al., 2023).</p>
      <p id="d2e7598">Although bubble effects are expected to be stronger for low-solubility tracers such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived and dual-tracer-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values agreed closely (Fig. 4A). This is primarily because the bubble contribution to the total gas exchange during CenBASE was relatively small due to the low wind regime (Fig. 5B). According to the widely used model (Woolf, 1997), bubble-mediated transfer contributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 25 % to total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 35 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange under wind speeds of 0–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This difference corresponds to only <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for dual tracers, which lies well within the measurement uncertainty and is therefore not practically distinguishable. Moreover, the much lower salinity in the Baltic Sea further limits the bubble-induced solubility dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Although the bubble size observations with the bubble cameras on a spar buoy did not work during CenBASE, it is well established that bubbles coalesce easily in fresh water (this is inhibited in salt water), so the initial bubble size distribution in fresher water quickly evolves towards larger bubbles through coalescence (e.g., De Leeuw et al., 2011). This coalescence effect has little influence on the gas transfer of moderately soluble gases such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but reduces <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for very low-solubility gases (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to the reduction of bubble surface area, thereby narrowing the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This also indicates that the parameterisation of the bubble-mediated component derived from open-ocean EC data (Yang et al., 2024) remains applicable to the Baltic Sea, despite differences in salinity and, thereby, the bubble-size distribution.</p>
      <p id="d2e7856">The suppression of gas exchange by surfactants has been well documented in laboratory studies, which report 10 %–65 % reductions in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> depending on surfactant concentration (Bock et al., 1999; Frew et al., 1990; Goldman et al., 1988; Mesarchaki et al., 2015; Pereira et al., 2016, 2018; Ribas-Ribas et al., 2018; Schmidt and Schneider, 2011). Based on the empirical relationship derived by Pereira et al. (2018) using laboratory data, the CenBASE microlayer surfactant concentration (0.54 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.08 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) corresponds to an estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Field studies have reported similar magnitudes of suppression (24 %–55 %) under artificial surfactant additions (Brockmann et al., 1982; Salter et al., 2011). More recently, field chamber measurements indicate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23 % suppression for natural surfactant levels exceeding 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mg</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mustaffa et al., 2020), and EC-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations have shown <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 % suppression at moderate winds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) under likely high surfactant conditions (Yang et al., 2021). Thus, the 25 % suppression estimated in this study agrees well with previous laboratory and field results.</p>
      <p id="d2e7980">Our findings refine the mechanistic understanding of air–sea gas exchange and have important implications for estimates of coastal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates. Using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation, both summer uptake and winter outgassing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Baltic Sea increase compared to a conventional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-based parameterisation, amplifying the seasonal cycle. Because many coastal regions exhibit similarly short fetches and elevated surfactant concentrations (Fig. A6), the mechanism-based parameterisation proposed here is expected to yield systematically different gas exchange efficiencies than conventional wind-speed-based formulations. The mechanism-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parameterisation could alter coastal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates (e.g., Resplandy et al., 2024), influencing annual means, long-term trends, seasonal cycles, and spatial patterns. An improved estimate of the ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sink may also help reduce discrepancies between the data-based and model-based global carbon budgets (Friedlingstein et al., 2025). The improvement in the estimate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is especially important for mCDR studies, which are often tested or developed in coastal environments (e.g., Ho et al., 2023). Beyond <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the updated parameterisation may also apply to other greenhouse gases, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which share the same interfacial exchange mechanism and exhibit similar bubble-mediated behavior due to their comparable solubility. Application to DMS is also possible, provided the bubble-mediated component is omitted.</p>
      <p id="d2e8111">Despite the advances from the CenBASE campaign, several uncertainties remain. The surfactant-induced suppression was inferred from residual differences between Baltic Sea and open-ocean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">_</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after correcting for fetch effects, and therefore carries considerable uncertainty even though the magnitude is consistent with previous field constraints. We were unable to partition the surfactant-induced suppression between interfacial and bubble-mediated pathways because available evidence is insufficient to quantify their relative roles. Observations were limited to low-to-moderate wind speeds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), preventing evaluation of the surfactant effect under high wind-speed conditions. Furthermore, surfactant concentrations were relatively uniform during CenBASE, so suppression could not be assessed across natural SA concentration gradients. Given the strong seasonal and spatial variability in biological production, the transferability of our quantified suppression values beyond the CenBASE conditions is uncertain. Addressing these limitations will require coordinated, multi-season observations across diverse fetch conditions, surfactant regimes, and wind speeds. Such efforts are essential for building a generalizable framework for gas exchange in marginal seas and for improving both regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets and assessment of emerging mCDR applications.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title/>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <label>A1</label><title>Dual-tracer experiments</title>
      <p id="d2e8187">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was determined using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dual tracer technique in addition to the eddy covariance method. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were injected into the surface ocean, and their concentrations were monitored over time. Assuming that air–sea gas exchange is the only process affecting the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be derived from the temporal change in their ratio (Nightingale et al., 2000). The two tracers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were injected with a molar ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">340</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on 6 July 2022 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth for 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, centered at 57.263° N, 20.147° E. The injected tracers were then tracked using an underway <inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> analysis system (Ho et al., 2002), which continuously measures the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration at the water surface, and the vessel-mounted acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) (150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kHz</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Ocean Surveyor, RD Instruments).</p>
      <p id="d2e8359">Near the center of the patch of injected tracers, water samples were taken using the CTD rosette equipped with 13 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Niskin bottles. Discrete <inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were taken from the Niskin bottles using 250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> syringes. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was measured onboard the ship using a gas chromatograph equipped with an electron capture detector (GC-ECD) in combination with a purge-and-trap system (Bullister and Weiss, 1988; Gerke et al., 2024). About 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of seawater for discrete <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples was collected in copper tubes placed in aluminum channels, with both ends sealed by stainless steel clamps. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> samples were sent to the laboratory at the Institute of Environmental Physics at the University of Bremen after the cruise. There, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was analyzed using a helium isotope mass spectrometer (MAP 215-50) (Sültenfuß et al., 2009).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <label>A2</label><title>Surfactant sampling</title>
      <p id="d2e8453">Surfactant samples from the SML were collected from a small workboat positioned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> upwind of the research vessel (Karnatz et al., 2025). The SML was sampled using the glass-plate technique and transferred into amber borosilicate glass bottles (Cunliffe and Wurl, 2014; Harvey and Burzell, 1972). When weather conditions were unfavorable, SML sampling was conducted from the bow of the research vessel using a Garrett screen. For surfactant samples, 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of SML samples were transferred into acid-washed and pre-combusted (500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> glass vials and immediately frozen at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Surface activity was analyzed within one year of collection by phase-sensitive alternating-current voltammetry using a 797 VA Computrace polarograph (Metrohm, Switzerland), following Cosović and Vojvodić (1982).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S1.SS3">
  <label>A3</label><title>Wind speed distortion correction</title>
      <p id="d2e8531">During CenBASE, wind speed was measured using two instruments: a 2D sonic anemometer mounted on the ship's foremast (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a 3D EC sonic anemometer on the front tower (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 1). The foremast measurements are expected to be less distorted because of the higher position of the sensor (O'Sullivan et al., 2013) and are, therefore, used in this study. Nevertheless, previous work shows that foremast-mounted anemometers can still be biased when the wind is not bow-on (e.g., Landwehr et al., 2018). To address this, we follow Landwehr et al. (2020) and use ERA5 reanalysis wind speeds, which are not affected by ship-relative flow distortions, to correct the ship measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e8598">Because ERA5 winds may contain regional biases, we first calibrate ERA5 using in situ measurements from the Östergarnsholm station (Rutgersson et al., 2020). Winds from five measurement heights (normalized to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are highly consistent, supporting the robustness of the station record (Fig. A8). We then compare station winds with ERA5 winds extracted at the station location for the period March–December 2024. To avoid land contamination, only winds from the open sector (80–160°; Rutgersson et al., 2020) are used. ERA5 is slightly lower than the station wind below 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but higher at stronger winds (Fig. A8). Two linear regressions are applied to ERA5 data, resulting in good agreement with the station winds (Fig. A8). Although the ERA5 wave data used in this study are simulated by a wave model forced with ERA5 winds, which may contain minor biases, these are not expected to substantially affect the simulated wave fields (Durrant et al., 2013).</p>
      <p id="d2e8629">The corrected ERA5 winds are then extracted at the CenBASE cruise location and time to serve as a reference for correcting ship wind distortions. The ratio of ship to corrected ERA5 wind speed as a function of relative wind direction shows the expected distortion pattern (Fig. A9; Moat et al., 2006; Moat and Yelland, 2015). We fit this ratio using three functions according to the relative wind direction: (1) quadratic for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 to 45°, (2) linear for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>90 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30°, and (3) linear for 45 to 90° (Fig. A9). This fitted relationship is used to correct the ship's wind speed. After correction, the ratio of ship to ERA5 wind speeds aligns closely with unity (Fig. A9).</p><fig id="FA1"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e8656">Fetch of the location according to the CenBASE cruise track. It is estimated based on the length to the land and the wind direction.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="FA2"><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d2e8669">Wave properties versus wind speed. Orange: Waves in the Baltic Sea during CenBASE; Blue: Waves in open ocean cruises with eddy covariance measurements (see Yang et al., 2022); and Red: Waves in the global ocean average. For the global ocean average, we use the year 2024 as an example and take the first day of each month at 00:00 UTC to capture seasonal variability. <bold>(A)</bold> Significant wave height; <bold>(B)</bold> Wave period; <bold>(C)</bold> Wave steepness; <bold>(D)</bold> Inverse wave age. See Sect. 2.3 of the Method for information on wave data extraction.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

<fig id="FA3"><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d2e8695">Bulk air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux estimates versus EC air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux observations. The Ho et al. (2006) parameterisation is used for the bulk flux estimate. The small dots are 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux data, and the large red dots represent the bin averages for every 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mmol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux interval. The EC flux observations are lower in magnitude than the bulk flux estimates at wind speeds higher than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="FA4"><label>Figure A4</label><caption><p id="d2e8787">Auto-covariance of EC-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series from 4–7 July, selected for its continuity (see Fig. 1F), was used for this analysis. The first point represents the variance of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series, while the second point shows the covariance between the original series and a version shifted by one point (i.e., 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The decrease from the first to the second point indicates the random uncertainty in this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %). This uncertainty can be further reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 20 % for a 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> average (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

<fig id="FA5"><label>Figure A5</label><caption><p id="d2e8910">Observed and parameterised gas transfer velocities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Red dots show 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> EC-derived bin averages (for each 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin), with red lines representing parameterisations fitted to these data. Blue squares denote DT-derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values (timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with blue lines showing corresponding parameterisations. Solid lines follow the fitting form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while dashed lines follow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">660</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

<fig id="FA6"><label>Figure A6</label><caption><p id="d2e9053">Estimated surfactant distributions in the global ocean and the open ocean EC cruise tracks. The surfactant concentration is estimated following Wurl et al. (2011) shown here as an annual mean. Red lines indicate the EC cruises that were synthesized in Yang et al. (2022).</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="FA7"><label>Figure A7</label><caption><p id="d2e9066">Representative dissolved oxygen, salinity and temperature data from the small spar buoy, showing the differences measured at 1.2 and 2.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depth. The patterns shown here are typical of both day and night measurement periods. The time shown here represents the UTC time.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

<fig id="FA8"><label>Figure A8</label><caption><p id="d2e9089">Correction of ERA5 wind speed using reference measurements from the Östergarnsholm station (restricted to the open sector, 80–160°; Rutgersson et al., 2020). <bold>(A)</bold> Comparison of the wind speed measurements from different heights at the Östergarnsholm station. All wind speeds were normalized to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(B)</bold> Comparison of the station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements and the extracted ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the location of the Östergarnsholm station. The red points are bin averages with error bars representing 1 standard deviation. The red points in panel <bold>(B)</bold> are fitted with 2 linear relationships: (1) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for station <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for correction. <bold>(C)</bold> Comparison of the station and ERA5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after the corrections using the relations in panel <bold>(B)</bold>.</p></caption>
          
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

<fig id="FA9"><label>Figure A9</label><caption><p id="d2e9296">Ratio of ship wind speed to subsampled ERA5 wind speed before (red) and after correction (yellow) as a function of relative wind direction (RWD). ERA5 wind speeds were first calibrated against the Östergarnsholm station record (Fig. A8). The fitted relationships (blue) are: (1) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.00036</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RWD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.97</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 to 45°, (2) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0023</mml:mn><mml:mtext>RWD</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>90 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30°, and (3) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.0035</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RWD</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 45 to 90°.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5567/2026/acp-26-5567-2026-f17.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e9399">The code that was used to produce the figures is available in the Supplement. The processed 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> EC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes, wind speeds, friction velocity, and gas transfer velocity can be found in the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e9421">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5567-2026-supplement" xlink:title="zip">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5567-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e9430">CM, DH, AE, and GR designed the project. YD processed and analyzed the data in consultation with CM, DH, and RD. CM collected the eddy covariance measurements; HCB collected the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fugacity data; and JK, AE, and BS collected the surfactant data. The dual-tracer data were provided by RD and DH. HC collected the spar buoy measurements. YD prepared the first draft of the manuscript, and all co-authors contributed to and approved the final version.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e9447">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e9453">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e9459">We thank the two reviewers, Dr. Brian Butterworth (NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory) and Dr. Brent Else (University of Calgary), for their constructive comments, which have greatly improved the quality of the manuscript. We thank the captains and crew of the RV <italic>Elisabeth Mann Borgese</italic>, T. Steffens (GEOMAR) for running the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux system, and Matthis Björner and Michael Glockzin (IOW) for running/postprocessing the MESS data. We greatly appreciate F. Göhring (Deutscher Wetterdienst), Dr. M. Yang (Plymouth Marine Laboratory), Dr. J. Bidlot (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts), Dr. A. Rutgersson (Uppsala University), Dr. J. Edson (Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution), and A. Körtzinger for helpful discussions. Data analysis and visualization were completed using Python. ChatGPT was used to carefully polish the manuscript's language to improve readability.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e9478">In this study, Y. Dong has been supported by the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. R. Dobashi acknowledges the support from the Crown Prince Akihito Scholarship and the Uehiro Foundation on Ethics and Education (UC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> AO contribution number: 35). The ICOS station Östergarnsholm is funded by the Swedish Research Council and Uppsala University. Ship time was provided by the Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research (IOW). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> study was funded by the US National Science Foundation through OCE-2123997.The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre  for Ocean Research Kiel.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e9519">This paper was edited by Thomas Karl and reviewed by Brian Butterworth and B.G.T. Else.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Bell, T. G., Landwehr, S., Miller, S. D., de Bruyn, W. J., Callaghan, A. H., Scanlon, B., Ward, B., Yang, M., and Saltzman, E. S.: Estimation of bubble-mediated air–sea gas exchange from concurrent DMS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocities at intermediate–high wind speeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9019–9033, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bessonova, V., Tapoglou, E., Dorrell, R., Dethlefs, N., and York, K.: Global evaluation of wave data reanalysis: Comparison of the ERA5 dataset to buoy observations, Appl. Ocean Res., 157, 104490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104490" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.apor.2025.104490</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bittig, H. C., Jacobs, E., Neumann, T., and Rehder, G.: A regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology of the Baltic Sea from in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations and a model-based extrapolation approach, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 753–773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-753-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-16-753-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Blomquist, B. W., Huebert, B. J., Fairall, C. W., Bariteau, L., Edson, J. B., Hare, J. E., and McGillis, W. R.: Advances in air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux measurement by eddy correlation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 152, 245–276, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9926-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10546-014-9926-2</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Blomquist, B. W., Brumer, S. E., Fairall, C. W., Huebert, B. J., Zappa, C. J., Brooks, I. M., Yang, M., Bariteau, L., Prytherch, J., Hare, J. E., Czerski, H., Matei, A., and Pascal, R. W.: Wind speed and sea state dependencies of air–sea gas transfer: Results from the High Wind Speed Gas Exchange Study (HiWinGS), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 8034–8062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013181" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JC013181</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bock, E. J., Hara, T., Frew, N. M., and McGillis, W. R.: Relationship between air–sea gas transfer and short wind waves, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 25821–25831, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JC900200</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Brockmann, U. H., Huhnerfuss, H., Kattner, G., Broecker, H., and Hentzschel, G.: Artificial surface films in the sea area near Sylt, Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 1050–1058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.6.1050" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1982.27.6.1050</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Brumer, S. E., Zappa, C. J., Blomquist, B. W., Fairall, C. W., Cifuentes-Lorenzen, A., Edson, J. B., Brooks, I. M., and Huebert, B. J.: Wave-related Reynolds number parameterizations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DMS transfer velocities, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9865–9875, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074979" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL074979</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Brumer, S. E., Zappa, C. J., Brooks, I. M., Tamura, H., Brown, S. M., Blomquist, B. W., Fairall, C. W., and Cifuentes-Lorenzen, A.:: Whitecap coverage dependence on wind and wave statistics as observed during SO GasEx and HiWinGS, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47, 2211–2235, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0005.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-17-0005.1</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bullister, J. L. and Weiss, R. F.: Determination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in seawater and air, Deep-Sea Res., 35, 839–853, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(88)90033-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(88)90033-7</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Cole, J. J. and Caraco, N. F.: Atmospheric exchange of carbon dioxide in a low-wind oligotrophic lake measured by the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 647–656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.4.0647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1998.43.4.0647</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Cosović, B. and Vojvodić, V.: The application of ac polarography to the determination of surface-active substances in seawater, Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 361–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.2.0361" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1982.27.2.0361</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Cunliffe, M. and Wurl, O.: Guide to best practices to study the ocean's surface, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom for SCOR, Plymouth, UK, <uri>http://plymsea.ac.uk/6523</uri> (last access:  14 April 2026), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>De Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E. R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.: Production flux of sea spray aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, 1–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010RG000349</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Deike, L.: Mass transfer at the ocean-atmosphere interface: The role of wave breaking, droplets, and bubbles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 54, 191–224, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-014132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-014132</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Deike, L. and Melville, W. K.: Gas transfer by breaking waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 10482–10492, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078758" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL078758</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Dobashi, R. and Ho, D. T.: Air–sea gas exchange in a seagrass ecosystem – results from a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer release experiment, Biogeosciences, 20, 1075–1087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1075-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-20-1075-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Dobashi, R., Ho, D. T., Dong, Y., Marandino, C. A., and Czerski, H.: Air-sea gas exchange in the central Baltic Sea, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1984" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2026-1984</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Doney, S. C., Wolfe, W. H., McKee, D. C., and Fuhrman, J. G.: The science, engineering, and validation of marine carbon dioxide removal and storage, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 16, 1–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-040523-014702" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-marine-040523-014702</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Dong, Y., Yang, M., Bakker, D. C. E., Kitidis, V., and Bell, T. G.: Uncertainties in eddy covariance air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux measurements and implications for gas transfer velocity parameterisations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8089–8110, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8089-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-8089-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Dong, Y., Jähne, B., Woolf, D. K., Krall, K. E., Yang, M., Czerski, H., Liang, J. H., Brooks, I. M., McNeil, C. L., Wanninkhof, R., and Ho, D. T.: The role of bubbles in air–sea gas exchange: A critical review, Authorea [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.175611263.31332921/v1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.22541/essoar.175611263.31332921/v1</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Durrant, T. H., Greenslade, D. J. M., and Simmonds, I.: The effect of statistical wind corrections on global wave forecasts, Ocean Model., 70, 116–131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.10.006</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Edson, J. B., Hinton, A. A., Prada, K. E., Hare, J. E., and Fairall, C. W.: Direct covariance flux estimates from mobile platforms at sea, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 15, 547–562, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015&lt;0547:DCFEFM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015&lt;0547:DCFEFM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Edson, J. B., Jampana, V., Weller, R. A., Bigorre, S. P., Plueddemann, A. J., Fairall, C. W., Miller, S. D., Mahrt, L., Vickers, D., and Hersbach, H.: On the exchange of momentum over the open ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43, 1589–1610, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-0173.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JPO-D-12-0173.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Fairall, C. W., Bariteau, L., Grachev, A. A., Hill, R. J., Wolfe, D. E., Brewer, W. A., Tucker, S. C., Hare, J. E., and Angevine, W. M.: Turbulent bulk transfer coefficients and ozone deposition velocity in the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research into Transport and Transformation, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 111, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007597" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007597</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Fairall, C. W., Yang, M., Brumer, S. E., Blomquist, B. W., Edson, J. B., Zappa, C. J., Bariteau, L., Pezoa, S., Bell, T. G., and Saltzman, E. S.: Air–sea trace gas fluxes: Direct and indirect measurements, Front. Mar. Sci., 9, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2022.826606</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Frew, N. M.: The role of organic films in air–sea gas exchange, in: The Sea Surface and Global Change, 121–172, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525025.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511525025.006</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Frew, N. M., Goldman, J. C., Dennett, M. R., and Johnson, A. S.: Impact of phytoplankton-generated surfactants on air–sea gas exchange, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 95, 3337–3352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC03p03337" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC095iC03p03337</ext-link>, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Frew, N. M., Bock, E. J., Schimpf, U., Hara, T., Haußecker, H., Edson, J. B., McGillis, W. R., Nelson, R. K., McKenna, S. P., Uz, B. M., and Jähne, B.: Air–sea gas transfer: Its dependence on wind stress, small-scale roughness, and surface films, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, 1–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JC002131</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Li, H., Luijkx, I. T., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Arneth, A., Arora, V., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Bellouin, N., Berghoff, C. F., Bittig, H. C., Bopp, L., Cadule, P., Campbell, K., Chamberlain, M. A., Chandra, N., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Colligan, T., Decayeux, J., Djeutchouang, L. M., Dou, X., Duran Rojas, C., Enyo, K., Evans, W., Fay, A. R., Feely, R. A., Ford, D. J., Foster, A., Gasser, T., Gehlen, M., Gkritzalis, T., Grassi, G., Gregor, L., Gruber, N., Gürses, Ö., Harris, I., Hefner, M., Heinke, J., Hurtt, G. C., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Jacobson, A. R., Jain, A. K., Jarníková, T., Jersild, A., Jiang, F., Jin, Z., Kato, E., Keeling, R. F., Klein Goldewijk, K., Knauer, J., Korsbakken, J. I., Lan, X., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Ma, L., Maksyutov, S., Marland, G., Mayot, N., McGuire, P. C., Metzl, N., Monacci, N. M., Morgan, E. J., Nakaoka, S.-I., Neill, C., Niwa, Y., Nützel, T., Olivier, L., Ono, T., Palmer, P. I., Pierrot, D., Qin, Z., Resplandy, L., Roobaert, A., Rosan, T. M., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Smallman, T. L., Smith, S. M., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Steinhoff, T., Sun, Q., Sutton, A. J., Séférian, R., Takao, S., Tatebe, H., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Torres, O., Tourigny, E., Tsujino, H., Tubiello, F., van der Werf, G., Wanninkhof, R., Wang, X., Yang, D., Yang, X., Yu, Z., Yuan, W., Yue, X., Zaehle, S., Zeng, N., and Zeng, J.: Global Carbon Budget 2024, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 965–1039, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-17-965-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Garbe, C. S., Rutgersson, A., Boutin, J., De Leeuw, G., Delille, B., Fairall, C. W., Gruber, N., Hare, J., Ho, D. T., and Johnson, M. T.: Transfer across the air–sea interface, in: Ocean-atmosphere interactions of gases and particles, 55–112, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25643-1_2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-25643-1_2</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Gerke, L., Arck, Y., and Tanhua, T.: Temporal variability of ventilation in the Eurasian Arctic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129, e2023JC020608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC020608" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JC020608</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Giudici, A., Jankowski, M. Z., Männikus, R., Najafzadeh, F., Suursaar, Ü., and Soomere, T.: A comparison of Baltic Sea wave properties simulated using two modelled wind data sets, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 290, 108401, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108401" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108401</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Goldman, J. C., Dennett, M. R., and Frew, N. M.: Surfactant effects on air–sea gas exchange under turbulent conditions, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. A, 35, 1953–1970, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(88)90119-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0198-0149(88)90119-7</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Gutiérrez-Loza, L., Nilsson, E., Wallin, M. B., Sahlée, E., and Rutgersson, A.: On physical mechanisms enhancing air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange, Biogeosciences, 19, 5645–5665, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5645-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-19-5645-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hammer, K., Schneider, B., Kuliński, K., and Schulz-Bull, D. E.: Acid-base properties of Baltic Sea dissolved organic matter, J. Mar. Syst., 173, 114–121, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.04.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.04.007</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Harvey, G. W. and Burzell, L. A.: A simple microlayer method for small samples 1, Limnol. Oceanogr., 17, 156–157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1972.17.1.0156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1972.17.1.0156</ext-link>, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soci., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Ho, D. T. and Wanninkhof, R.: Air–sea gas exchange in the North Atlantic: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> experiment during GasEx-98, Tellus B, 68, 30198, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.30198" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v68.30198</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Ho, D. T., Schlosser, P., and Caplow, T.: Determination of longitudinal dispersion coefficient and net advection in the tidal Hudson River with a large-scale, high resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SF</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tracer release experiment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3234–3241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es015814" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es015814</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Ho, D. T., Law, C. S., Smith, M. J., Schlosser, P., Harvey, M., and Hill, P.: Measurements of air–sea gas exchange at high wind speeds in the Southern Ocean: Implications for global parameterizations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L16611, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026817" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026817</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Ho, D. T., Bopp, L., Palter, J. B., Long, M. C., Boyd, P. W., Neukermans, G., and Bach, L. T.: Monitoring, reporting, and verification for ocean alkalinity enhancement, in: Guide to Best Practices in Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Research, edited by: Oschlies, A., Stevenson, A., Bach, L. T., Fennel, K., Rickaby, R. E. M., Satterfield, T., Webb, R., and Gattuso, J.-P., Copernicus Publications, State Planet, 2-oae2023, 12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-12-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-12-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Jähne, B. J., Münnich, K. O. M., Bösinger, R., Dutzi, A., Huber, W., and Libner, P.: On the parameters influencing air-water gas exchange, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 1937–1949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC02p01937" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC092iC02p01937</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Karnatz, J., Barthelmeß, T., Sabbaghzadeh, B., and Engel, A.: Biochemical Characteristics of the Sea Surface Microlayer in the Central Baltic Sea and Potential Signatures of Cyanobacterial Blooms, EGUsphere [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/egusphere-2025-5385</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Klavins, M. and Purmalis, O.: Humic substances as surfactants, Environ. Chem. Lett., 8, 349–354, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0232-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10311-009-0232-z</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Kunz, J. and Jähne, B.: Investigating small-scale air–sea exchange processes via thermography, Front. Mech. Eng., 4, 4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2018.00004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmech.2018.00004</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Kuss, J., Nagel, K., and Schneider, B.: Evidence from the Baltic Sea for an enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air–sea transfer velocity, Tellus B, 56, 175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v56i2.16407" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v56i2.16407</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Landwehr, S., Miller, S. D., Smith, M. J., Bell, T. G., Saltzman, E. S., and Ward, B.: Using eddy covariance to measure the dependence of air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange rate on friction velocity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4297–4315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4297-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-4297-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Landwehr, S., Thurnherr, I., Cassar, N., Gysel-Beer, M., and Schmale, J.: Using global reanalysis data to quantify and correct airflow distortion bias in shipborne wind speed measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3487–3506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3487-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-3487-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>McGillis, W. R., Edson, J. B., Ware, J. D., Dacey, J. W. H., Hare, J. E., Fairall, C. W., and Wanninkhof, R.: Carbon dioxide flux techniques performed during GasEx-98, Mar. Chem., 75, 267–280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(01)00042-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0304-4203(01)00042-1</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>McGillis, W. R., Edson, J. B., Zappa, C. J., Ware, J. D., McKenna, S. P., Terray, E. A., Hare, J. E., Fairall, C. W., Drennan, W., and Donelan, M.: Air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange in the equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, C08S90, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002256" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JC002256</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>McKenna, S. P. and McGillis, W. R.: The role of free-surface turbulence and surfactants in air–water gas transfer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47, 539–553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.06.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.06.001</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Mesarchaki, E., Kräuter, C., Krall, K. E., Bopp, M., Helleis, F., Williams, J., and Jähne, B.: Measuring air–sea gas-exchange velocities in a large-scale annular wind–wave tank, Ocean Sci., 11, 121–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-121-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-11-121-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Miller, S. D., Hristov, T. S., Edson, J. B., and Friehe, C. A.: Platform motion effects on measurements of turbulence and air–sea exchange over the open ocean, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1683–1694, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHO547.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2008JTECHO547.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Miller, S. D., Marandino, C., and Saltzman, E. S.: Ship-based measurement of air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange by eddy covariance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D02112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012193" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012193</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Moat, B. and Yelland, M.: Airflow distortion at instrument sites on the RRS James Clark Ross during the WAGES project, Natl. Oceanogr. Cent. Internal Doc., 12, <uri>http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/509304</uri> (last access: 14 April 2026), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Moat, B. I., Yelland, M. J., and Cooper, E. B.: The airflow distortion at instruments sites on the RRS “James Cook”, Natl. Oceanogr. Cent. Southampton Res. Consult. Rep., 11, 44 pp., <uri>http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/41147</uri> (last access: 14 April 2026), 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Mustaffa, N. I. H., Ribas-Ribas, M., Banko-Kubis, H. M., and Wurl, O.: Global reduction of in situ <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity by natural surfactants in the sea-surface microlayer, P. R. Soc. A, 476, 20190763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rspa.2019.0763</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Nightingale, P. D., Malin, G., Law, C. S., Watson, A. J., Liss, P. S., Liddicoat, M. I., Boutin, J., and Upstill-Goddard, R. C.: In situ evaluation of air–sea gas exchange parameterizations using novel conservative and volatile tracers, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 373–387, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999GB900091</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>O'Sullivan, N., Landwehr, S., and Ward, B.: Mapping flow distortion on oceanographic platforms using computational fluid dynamics, Ocean Sci., 9, 855–866, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-855-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-9-855-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Ocampo-Torres, F. J. and Donelan, M. A.: On the influence of fetch and the wave field on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer process: Laboratory measurements, in: Air–Water Gas Transfer, edited by: Jähne, B. and Monahan, E. C., AEON Verlag &amp; Studio, Hanau, 543–552, Corpus ID: 111822886, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Parard, G., Charantonis, A. A., and Rutgersson, A.: Using satellite data to estimate partial pressure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Baltic Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 1002–1015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003064" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JG003064</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Pereira, R., Schneider-Zapp, K., and Upstill-Goddard, R. C.: Surfactant control of gas transfer velocity along an offshore coastal transect: results from a laboratory gas exchange tank, Biogeosciences, 13, 3981–3989, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3981-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-13-3981-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Pereira, R., Ashton, I., Sabbaghzadeh, B., Shutler, J. D., and Upstill-Goddard, R. C.: Reduced air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange in the Atlantic Ocean due to biological surfactants, Nat. Geosci., 11, 492–496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0136-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-018-0136-2</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Pitarch, J., Volpe, G., Colella, S., Krasemann, H., and Santoleri, R.: Remote sensing of chlorophyll in the Baltic Sea at basin scale from 1997 to 2012 using merged multi-sensor data, Ocean Sci., 12, 379–389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-379-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/os-12-379-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Prytherch, J. and Yelland, M. J.: Wind, convection and fetch dependence of gas transfer velocity in an Arctic sea-ice lead determined from eddy covariance <inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flux measurements, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 35, e2020GB006633, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006633" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GB006633</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Resplandy, L., Hogikyan, A., Müller, J. D., Najjar, R. G., Bange, H. W., Bianchi, D., Weber, T., Cai, W. J., Doney, S. C., Fennel, K., Gehlen, M., Hauck, J., Lacroix, F., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Roobaert, A., Schwinger, J., Berthet, S., Bopp, L., Chau, T. T. T., Dai, M., Gruber, N., Ilyina, T., Kock, A., Manizza, M., Lachkar, Z., Laruelle, G. G., Liao, E., Lima, I. D., Nissen, C., Rödenbeck, C., Séférian, R., Toyama, K., Tsujino, H., and Regnier, P.: A synthesis of global coastal ocean greenhouse gas fluxes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 38, 1–38, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023GB007803</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Ribas-Ribas, M., Helleis, F., Rahlff, J., and Wurl, O.: Air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange in a large annular wind-wave tank and the effects of surfactants, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00457" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2018.00457</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Rutgersson, A. and Smedman, A.: Enhanced air–sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer due to water-side convection, J. Marine Syst., 80, 125–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.11.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.11.004</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Rutgersson, A., Pettersson, H., Nilsson, E., Bergström, H., Wallin, M. B. E., Nilsson, E. D., Sahlée, E., Wu, L. E., and Mårtensson, E. M.: Using land-based stations for air–sea interaction studies, Tellus A, 72, 1–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1697601" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/16000870.2019.1697601</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Sabbaghzadeh, B., Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Beale, R., Pereira, R., and Nightingale, P. D.: The Atlantic Ocean surface microlayer from 50° N to 50° S is ubiquitously enriched in surfactants at wind speeds up to 13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2852–2858, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072988" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL072988</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Sabbaghzadeh, B., Arévalo-Martínez, D. L., Glockzin, M., Otto, S., and Rehder, G.: Meridional and cross-shelf variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the eastern-south Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016878" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JC016878</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Salter, M. E., Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Nightingale, P. D., Archer, S. D., Blomquist, B., Ho, D. T., Huebert, B., Schlosser, P., and Yang, M.: Impact of an artificial surfactant release on air–sea gas fluxes during Deep Ocean Gas Exchange Experiment II, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, C11007, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JC007023</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, R. and Schneider, B.: The effect of surface films on the air–sea gas exchange in the Baltic Sea, Mar. Chem., 126, 56–62, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2011.03.007</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Sültenfuß, J., Roether, W., and Rhein, M.: The Bremen mass spectrometric facility for the measurement of helium isotopes, neon, and tritium in water, Isot. Environ. Health Stud., 45, 83–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902871929" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/10256010902871929</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Upstill-Goddard, R. C.: Air–sea gas exchange in the coastal zone, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 70, 388–404, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.043</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Vickers, D. and Mahrt, L.: Fetch limited drag coefficients, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 85, 53–79, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000472623187" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1023/A:1000472623187</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wanninkhof, R.: Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean revisited, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 12, 351–362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lom.2014.12.351</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wanninkhof, R., Asher, W. E., Ho, D. T., Sweeney, C., and McGillis, W. R.: Advances in quantifying air–sea gas exchange and environmental forcing, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 213–244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163742" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163742</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Weiss, R. F.: Carbon dioxide in water and seawater: the solubility of a non-ideal gas, Mar. Chem., 2, 203–215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(74)90015-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0304-4203(74)90015-2</ext-link>, 1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Woolf, D. K.: Bubbles and the air–sea transfer velocity of gases, Atmos. Ocean, 31, 517–540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1993.9649484" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/07055900.1993.9649484</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Woolf, D. K.: Bubbles and their role in gas exchange, in: The Sea Surface and Global Change, edited by: Liss P. S. and Duce R. A., 173–206, Cambridge University Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525025.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9780511525025.007</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Woolf, D. K.: Parametrization of gas transfer velocities and sea-state-dependent wave breaking, Tellus B, 57, 87, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v57i2.16783" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v57i2.16783</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Woolf, D. K., Land, P. E., Shutler, J. D., Goddijn-Murphy, L. M., and Donlon, C. J.: On the calculation of air–sea fluxes of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the presence of temperature and salinity gradients, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 1229–1248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011427" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JC011427</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Wurl, O., Wurl, E., Miller, L., Johnson, K., and Vagle, S.: Formation and global distribution of sea-surface microlayers, Biogeosciences, 8, 121–135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-121-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-8-121-2011</ext-link>, 2011. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Smyth, T. J., Kitidis, V., Brown, I. J., Wohl, C., Yelland, M. J., and Bell, T. G.: Natural variability in air–sea gas transfer efficiency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sci. Rep., 11, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92947-w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-021-92947-w</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Bell, T. G., Bidlot, J. R., Blomquist, B. W., Butterworth, B. J., Dong, Y., Fairall, C. W., Landwehr, S., Marandino, C. A., Miller, S. D., Saltzman, E. S., and Zavarsky, A.: Global synthesis of air-Sea <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity estimates from ship-based eddy covariance measurements, Front. Mar. Sci., 9, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826421" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/fmars.2022.826421</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Moffat, D., Dong, Y., and Bidlot, J.-R.: Deciphering the variability in air–sea gas transfer due to sea state and wind history, PNAS Nexus, pgae389, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae389" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae389</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, D., Toba, Y., Suzuki, Y., and Komori, S.: Effect of wind waves on air–sea gas exchange: Proposal of an overall <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transfer velocity formula as a function of breaking-wave parameter, Tellus B, 55, 478–487, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v55i2.16747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v55i2.16747</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Mechanisms of air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in the central Baltic Sea</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bell, T. G., Landwehr, S., Miller, S. D., de Bruyn, W. J., Callaghan, A. H., Scanlon, B., Ward, B., Yang, M., and Saltzman, E. S.:
Estimation of bubble-mediated air–sea gas exchange from concurrent DMS and CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocities at intermediate–high wind speeds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9019–9033, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9019-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bessonova, V., Tapoglou, E., Dorrell, R., Dethlefs, N., and York, K.:
Global evaluation of wave data reanalysis: Comparison of the ERA5 dataset to buoy observations, Appl. Ocean Res., 157, 104490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104490" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2025.104490</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bittig, H. C., Jacobs, E., Neumann, T., and Rehder, G.:
A regional <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> climatology of the Baltic Sea from in situ <i>p</i>CO<sub>2</sub> observations and a model-based extrapolation approach, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 753–773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-753-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-753-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blomquist, B. W., Huebert, B. J., Fairall, C. W., Bariteau, L., Edson, J. B., Hare, J. E., and McGillis, W. R.:
Advances in air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux measurement by eddy correlation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 152, 245–276, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9926-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9926-2</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Blomquist, B. W., Brumer, S. E., Fairall, C. W., Huebert, B. J., Zappa, C. J., Brooks, I. M., Yang, M., Bariteau, L., Prytherch, J., Hare, J. E., Czerski, H., Matei, A., and Pascal, R. W.:
Wind speed and sea state dependencies of air–sea gas transfer: Results from the High Wind Speed Gas Exchange Study (HiWinGS), J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 122, 8034–8062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013181" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JC013181</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bock, E. J., Hara, T., Frew, N. M., and McGillis, W. R.:
Relationship between air–sea gas transfer and short wind waves, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 104, 25821–25831, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900200" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JC900200</a>, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brockmann, U. H., Huhnerfuss, H., Kattner, G., Broecker, H., and Hentzschel, G.:
Artificial surface films in the sea area near Sylt, Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 1050–1058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.6.1050" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.6.1050</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brumer, S. E., Zappa, C. J., Blomquist, B. W., Fairall, C. W., Cifuentes-Lorenzen, A., Edson, J. B., Brooks, I. M., and Huebert, B. J.: Wave-related Reynolds number parameterizations of CO<sub>2</sub> and DMS transfer velocities, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 9865–9875, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074979" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074979</a>, 2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Brumer, S. E., Zappa, C. J., Brooks, I. M., Tamura, H., Brown, S. M., Blomquist, B. W., Fairall, C. W., and Cifuentes-Lorenzen, A.:: Whitecap coverage dependence on wind and wave statistics as observed during SO GasEx and HiWinGS, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 47, 2211–2235, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0005.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-17-0005.1</a>, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bullister, J. L. and Weiss, R. F.:
Determination of CCl<sub>3</sub>F and CCl<sub>2</sub>F<sub>2</sub> in seawater and air, Deep-Sea Res., 35, 839–853, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(88)90033-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(88)90033-7</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cole, J. J. and Caraco, N. F.:
Atmospheric exchange of carbon dioxide in a low-wind oligotrophic lake measured by the addition of SF<sub>6</sub>, Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 647–656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.4.0647" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1998.43.4.0647</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cosović, B. and Vojvodić, V.:
The application of ac polarography to the determination of surface-active substances in seawater, Limnol. Oceanogr., 27, 361–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.2.0361" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1982.27.2.0361</a>, 1982.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Cunliffe, M. and Wurl, O.:
Guide to best practices to study the ocean's surface, Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom for SCOR, Plymouth, UK, <a href="http://plymsea.ac.uk/6523" target="_blank"/> (last access:  14 April 2026), 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Leeuw, G., Andreas, E. L., Anguelova, M. D., Fairall, C. W., Lewis, E. R., O'Dowd, C., Schulz, M., and Schwartz, S. E.:
Production flux of sea spray aerosol, Rev. Geophys., 49, 1–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000349</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deike, L.:
Mass transfer at the ocean-atmosphere interface: The role of wave breaking, droplets, and bubbles, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 54, 191–224, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-014132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121-014132</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deike, L. and Melville, W. K.:
Gas transfer by breaking waves, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 10482–10492, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078758" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL078758</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dobashi, R. and Ho, D. T.:
Air–sea gas exchange in a seagrass ecosystem – results from a <sup>3</sup>He∕SF<sub>6</sub> tracer release experiment, Biogeosciences, 20, 1075–1087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1075-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-1075-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dobashi, R., Ho, D. T., Dong, Y., Marandino, C. A., and Czerski, H.: Air-sea gas exchange in the central Baltic Sea, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1984" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1984</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Doney, S. C., Wolfe, W. H., McKee, D. C., and Fuhrman, J. G.:
The science, engineering, and validation of marine carbon dioxide removal and storage, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 16, 1–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-040523-014702" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-marine-040523-014702</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dong, Y., Yang, M., Bakker, D. C. E., Kitidis, V., and Bell, T. G.:
Uncertainties in eddy covariance air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> flux measurements and implications for gas transfer velocity parameterisations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 8089–8110, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8089-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-8089-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dong, Y., Jähne, B., Woolf, D. K., Krall, K. E., Yang, M., Czerski, H., Liang, J. H., Brooks, I. M., McNeil, C. L., Wanninkhof, R., and Ho, D. T.:
The role of bubbles in air–sea gas exchange: A critical review, Authorea [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.175611263.31332921/v1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.175611263.31332921/v1</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Durrant, T. H., Greenslade, D. J. M., and Simmonds, I.:
The effect of statistical wind corrections on global wave forecasts, Ocean Model., 70, 116–131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2012.10.006</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Edson, J. B., Hinton, A. A., Prada, K. E., Hare, J. E., and Fairall, C. W.:
Direct covariance flux estimates from mobile platforms at sea, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 15, 547–562, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015&lt;0547:DCFEFM&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1998)015&lt;0547:DCFEFM&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Edson, J. B., Jampana, V., Weller, R. A., Bigorre, S. P., Plueddemann, A. J., Fairall, C. W., Miller, S. D., Mahrt, L., Vickers, D., and Hersbach, H.:
On the exchange of momentum over the open ocean, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43, 1589–1610, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-0173.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-12-0173.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fairall, C. W., Bariteau, L., Grachev, A. A., Hill, R. J., Wolfe, D. E., Brewer, W. A., Tucker, S. C., Hare, J. E., and Angevine, W. M.:
Turbulent bulk transfer coefficients and ozone deposition velocity in the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research into Transport and Transformation, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 111, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007597" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007597</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fairall, C. W., Yang, M., Brumer, S. E., Blomquist, B. W., Edson, J. B., Zappa, C. J., Bariteau, L., Pezoa, S., Bell, T. G., and Saltzman, E. S.:
Air–sea trace gas fluxes: Direct and indirect measurements, Front. Mar. Sci., 9, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826606</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frew, N. M.:
The role of organic films in air–sea gas exchange, in: The Sea Surface and Global Change, 121–172, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525025.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525025.006</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frew, N. M., Goldman, J. C., Dennett, M. R., and Johnson, A. S.:
Impact of phytoplankton-generated surfactants on air–sea gas exchange, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 95, 3337–3352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC03p03337" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC095iC03p03337</a>, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Frew, N. M., Bock, E. J., Schimpf, U., Hara, T., Haußecker, H., Edson, J. B., McGillis, W. R., Nelson, R. K., McKenna, S. P., Uz, B. M., and Jähne, B.:
Air–sea gas transfer: Its dependence on wind stress, small-scale roughness, and surface films, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, 1–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002131</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Friedlingstein, P., O'Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Hauck, J., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Li, H., Luijkx, I. T., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Arneth, A., Arora, V., Bates, N. R., Becker, M., Bellouin, N., Berghoff, C. F., Bittig, H. C., Bopp, L., Cadule, P., Campbell, K., Chamberlain, M. A., Chandra, N., Chevallier, F., Chini, L. P., Colligan, T., Decayeux, J., Djeutchouang, L. M., Dou, X., Duran Rojas, C., Enyo, K., Evans, W., Fay, A. R., Feely, R. A., Ford, D. J., Foster, A., Gasser, T., Gehlen, M., Gkritzalis, T., Grassi, G., Gregor, L., Gruber, N., Gürses, Ö., Harris, I., Hefner, M., Heinke, J., Hurtt, G. C., Iida, Y., Ilyina, T., Jacobson, A. R., Jain, A. K., Jarníková, T., Jersild, A., Jiang, F., Jin, Z., Kato, E., Keeling, R. F., Klein Goldewijk, K., Knauer, J., Korsbakken, J. I., Lan, X., Lauvset, S. K., Lefèvre, N., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Ma, L., Maksyutov, S., Marland, G., Mayot, N., McGuire, P. C., Metzl, N., Monacci, N. M., Morgan, E. J., Nakaoka, S.-I., Neill, C., Niwa, Y., Nützel, T., Olivier, L., Ono, T., Palmer, P. I., Pierrot, D., Qin, Z., Resplandy, L., Roobaert, A., Rosan, T. M., Rödenbeck, C., Schwinger, J., Smallman, T. L., Smith, S. M., Sospedra-Alfonso, R., Steinhoff, T., Sun, Q., Sutton, A. J., Séférian, R., Takao, S., Tatebe, H., Tian, H., Tilbrook, B., Torres, O., Tourigny, E., Tsujino, H., Tubiello, F., van der Werf, G., Wanninkhof, R., Wang, X., Yang, D., Yang, X., Yu, Z., Yuan, W., Yue, X., Zaehle, S., Zeng, N., and Zeng, J.:
Global Carbon Budget 2024, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 17, 965–1039, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-17-965-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Garbe, C. S., Rutgersson, A., Boutin, J., De Leeuw, G., Delille, B., Fairall, C. W., Gruber, N., Hare, J., Ho, D. T., and Johnson, M. T.:
Transfer across the air–sea interface, in: Ocean-atmosphere interactions of gases and particles, 55–112, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25643-1_2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25643-1_2</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gerke, L., Arck, Y., and Tanhua, T.:
Temporal variability of ventilation in the Eurasian Arctic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 129, e2023JC020608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC020608" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JC020608</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Giudici, A., Jankowski, M. Z., Männikus, R., Najafzadeh, F., Suursaar, Ü., and Soomere, T.:
A comparison of Baltic Sea wave properties simulated using two modelled wind data sets, Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci., 290, 108401, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108401" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108401</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Goldman, J. C., Dennett, M. R., and Frew, N. M.:
Surfactant effects on air–sea gas exchange under turbulent conditions, Deep-Sea Res. Pt. A, 35, 1953–1970, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(88)90119-7" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(88)90119-7</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gutiérrez-Loza, L., Nilsson, E., Wallin, M. B., Sahlée, E., and Rutgersson, A.:
On physical mechanisms enhancing air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange, Biogeosciences, 19, 5645–5665, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5645-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-5645-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hammer, K., Schneider, B., Kuliński, K., and Schulz-Bull, D. E.:
Acid-base properties of Baltic Sea dissolved organic matter, J. Mar. Syst., 173, 114–121, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.04.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.04.007</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Harvey, G. W. and Burzell, L. A.:
A simple microlayer method for small samples 1, Limnol. Oceanogr., 17, 156–157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1972.17.1.0156" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1972.17.1.0156</a>, 1972.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soci., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ho, D. T. and Wanninkhof, R.:
Air–sea gas exchange in the North Atlantic: <sup>3</sup>He∕SF<sub>6</sub> experiment during GasEx-98, Tellus B, 68, 30198, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.30198" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v68.30198</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ho, D. T., Schlosser, P., and Caplow, T.:
Determination of longitudinal dispersion coefficient and net advection in the tidal Hudson River with a large-scale, high resolution SF<sub>6</sub> tracer release experiment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36, 3234–3241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es015814" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es015814</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ho, D. T., Law, C. S., Smith, M. J., Schlosser, P., Harvey, M., and Hill, P.:
Measurements of air–sea gas exchange at high wind speeds in the Southern Ocean: Implications for global parameterizations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L16611, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026817" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026817</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ho, D. T., Bopp, L., Palter, J. B., Long, M. C., Boyd, P. W., Neukermans, G., and Bach, L. T.:
Monitoring, reporting, and verification for ocean alkalinity enhancement, in: Guide to Best Practices in Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement Research, edited by: Oschlies, A., Stevenson, A., Bach, L. T., Fennel, K., Rickaby, R. E. M., Satterfield, T., Webb, R., and Gattuso, J.-P., Copernicus Publications, State Planet, 2-oae2023, 12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-12-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/sp-2-oae2023-12-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jähne, B. J., Münnich, K. O. M., Bösinger, R., Dutzi, A., Huber, W., and Libner, P.:
On the parameters influencing air-water gas exchange, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 1937–1949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC02p01937" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC092iC02p01937</a>, 1987.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Karnatz, J., Barthelmeß, T., Sabbaghzadeh, B., and Engel, A.:
Biochemical Characteristics of the Sea Surface Microlayer in the Central Baltic Sea and Potential Signatures of Cyanobacterial Blooms, EGUsphere [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-5385</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Klavins, M. and Purmalis, O.:
Humic substances as surfactants, Environ. Chem. Lett., 8, 349–354, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0232-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0232-z</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kunz, J. and Jähne, B.:
Investigating small-scale air–sea exchange processes via thermography, Front. Mech. Eng., 4, 4, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2018.00004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmech.2018.00004</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kuss, J., Nagel, K., and Schneider, B.:
Evidence from the Baltic Sea for an enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> air–sea transfer velocity, Tellus B, 56, 175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v56i2.16407" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v56i2.16407</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Landwehr, S., Miller, S. D., Smith, M. J., Bell, T. G., Saltzman, E. S., and Ward, B.:
Using eddy covariance to measure the dependence of air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange rate on friction velocity, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 4297–4315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4297-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-4297-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Landwehr, S., Thurnherr, I., Cassar, N., Gysel-Beer, M., and Schmale, J.:
Using global reanalysis data to quantify and correct airflow distortion bias in shipborne wind speed measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3487–3506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3487-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3487-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGillis, W. R., Edson, J. B., Ware, J. D., Dacey, J. W. H., Hare, J. E., Fairall, C. W., and Wanninkhof, R.:
Carbon dioxide flux techniques performed during GasEx-98, Mar. Chem., 75, 267–280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(01)00042-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4203(01)00042-1</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
McGillis, W. R., Edson, J. B., Zappa, C. J., Ware, J. D., McKenna, S. P., Terray, E. A., Hare, J. E., Fairall, C. W., Drennan, W., and Donelan, M.:
Air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in the equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 109, C08S90, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002256" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC002256</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
McKenna, S. P. and McGillis, W. R.:
The role of free-surface turbulence and surfactants in air–water gas transfer, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 47, 539–553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.06.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2003.06.001</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mesarchaki, E., Kräuter, C., Krall, K. E., Bopp, M., Helleis, F., Williams, J., and Jähne, B.:
Measuring air–sea gas-exchange velocities in a large-scale annular wind–wave tank, Ocean Sci., 11, 121–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-121-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-11-121-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miller, S. D., Hristov, T. S., Edson, J. B., and Friehe, C. A.:
Platform motion effects on measurements of turbulence and air–sea exchange over the open ocean, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 25, 1683–1694, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHO547.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHO547.1</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miller, S. D., Marandino, C., and Saltzman, E. S.:
Ship-based measurement of air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange by eddy covariance, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D02112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012193</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moat, B. and Yelland, M.:
Airflow distortion at instrument sites on the RRS James Clark Ross during the WAGES project, Natl. Oceanogr. Cent. Internal Doc., 12, <a href="http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/509304" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 April 2026), 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Moat, B. I., Yelland, M. J., and Cooper, E. B.:
The airflow distortion at instruments sites on the RRS “James Cook”, Natl. Oceanogr. Cent. Southampton Res. Consult. Rep., 11, 44 pp., <a href="http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/41147" target="_blank"/> (last access: 14 April 2026), 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mustaffa, N. I. H., Ribas-Ribas, M., Banko-Kubis, H. M., and Wurl, O.:
Global reduction of in situ CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity by natural surfactants in the sea-surface microlayer, P. R. Soc. A, 476, 20190763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2019.0763</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nightingale, P. D., Malin, G., Law, C. S., Watson, A. J., Liss, P. S., Liddicoat, M. I., Boutin, J., and Upstill-Goddard, R. C.:
In situ evaluation of air–sea gas exchange parameterizations using novel conservative and volatile tracers, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 14, 373–387, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900091" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GB900091</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
O'Sullivan, N., Landwehr, S., and Ward, B.:
Mapping flow distortion on oceanographic platforms using computational fluid dynamics, Ocean Sci., 9, 855–866, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-855-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-9-855-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ocampo-Torres, F. J. and Donelan, M. A.:
On the influence of fetch and the wave field on the CO<sub>2</sub> transfer process: Laboratory measurements, in: Air–Water Gas Transfer, edited by: Jähne, B. and Monahan, E. C., AEON Verlag &amp; Studio, Hanau, 543–552, Corpus ID: 111822886, 1995.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Parard, G., Charantonis, A. A., and Rutgersson, A.:
Using satellite data to estimate partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> in the Baltic Sea, J. Geophys. Res.-Biogeo., 121, 1002–1015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003064" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JG003064</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pereira, R., Schneider-Zapp, K., and Upstill-Goddard, R. C.:
Surfactant control of gas transfer velocity along an offshore coastal transect: results from a laboratory gas exchange tank, Biogeosciences, 13, 3981–3989, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3981-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-13-3981-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pereira, R., Ashton, I., Sabbaghzadeh, B., Shutler, J. D., and Upstill-Goddard, R. C.:
Reduced air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in the Atlantic Ocean due to biological surfactants, Nat. Geosci., 11, 492–496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0136-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0136-2</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pitarch, J., Volpe, G., Colella, S., Krasemann, H., and Santoleri, R.:
Remote sensing of chlorophyll in the Baltic Sea at basin scale from 1997 to 2012 using merged multi-sensor data, Ocean Sci., 12, 379–389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-379-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/os-12-379-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Prytherch, J. and Yelland, M. J.:
Wind, convection and fetch dependence of gas transfer velocity in an Arctic sea-ice lead determined from eddy covariance CO<sub>2</sub> flux measurements, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 35, e2020GB006633, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006633" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GB006633</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Resplandy, L., Hogikyan, A., Müller, J. D., Najjar, R. G., Bange, H. W., Bianchi, D., Weber, T., Cai, W. J., Doney, S. C., Fennel, K., Gehlen, M., Hauck, J., Lacroix, F., Landschützer, P., Le Quéré, C., Roobaert, A., Schwinger, J., Berthet, S., Bopp, L., Chau, T. T. T., Dai, M., Gruber, N., Ilyina, T., Kock, A., Manizza, M., Lachkar, Z., Laruelle, G. G., Liao, E., Lima, I. D., Nissen, C., Rödenbeck, C., Séférian, R., Toyama, K., Tsujino, H., and Regnier, P.: A synthesis of global coastal ocean greenhouse gas fluxes, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 38, 1–38, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023GB007803</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ribas-Ribas, M., Helleis, F., Rahlff, J., and Wurl, O.:
Air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in a large annular wind-wave tank and the effects of surfactants, Front. Mar. Sci., 5, 457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00457" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00457</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rutgersson, A. and Smedman, A.:
Enhanced air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> transfer due to water-side convection, J. Marine Syst., 80, 125–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.11.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2009.11.004</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rutgersson, A., Pettersson, H., Nilsson, E., Bergström, H., Wallin, M. B. E., Nilsson, E. D., Sahlée, E., Wu, L. E., and Mårtensson, E. M.:
Using land-based stations for air–sea interaction studies, Tellus A, 72, 1–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1697601" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/16000870.2019.1697601</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sabbaghzadeh, B., Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Beale, R., Pereira, R., and Nightingale, P. D.:
The Atlantic Ocean surface microlayer from 50°&thinsp;N to 50°&thinsp;S is ubiquitously enriched in surfactants at wind speeds up to 13&thinsp;m s<sup>−1</sup>, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2852–2858, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072988" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072988</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sabbaghzadeh, B., Arévalo-Martínez, D. L., Glockzin, M., Otto, S., and Rehder, G.:
Meridional and cross-shelf variability of N<sub>2</sub>O and CH<sub>4</sub> in the eastern-south Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 126, e2020JC016878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016878" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016878</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Salter, M. E., Upstill-Goddard, R. C., Nightingale, P. D., Archer, S. D., Blomquist, B., Ho, D. T., Huebert, B., Schlosser, P., and Yang, M.:
Impact of an artificial surfactant release on air–sea gas fluxes during Deep Ocean Gas Exchange Experiment II, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 116, C11007, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007023</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmidt, R. and Schneider, B.:
The effect of surface films on the air–sea gas exchange in the Baltic Sea, Mar. Chem., 126, 56–62, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2011.03.007</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sültenfuß, J., Roether, W., and Rhein, M.:
The Bremen mass spectrometric facility for the measurement of helium isotopes, neon, and tritium in water, Isot. Environ. Health Stud., 45, 83–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902871929" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/10256010902871929</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Upstill-Goddard, R. C.:
Air–sea gas exchange in the coastal zone, Estuar. Coast. Shelf S., 70, 388–404, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2006.05.043</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Vickers, D. and Mahrt, L.:
Fetch limited drag coefficients, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 85, 53–79, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000472623187" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000472623187</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wanninkhof, R.:
Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean revisited, Limnol. Oceanogr.-Meth., 12, 351–362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2014.12.351</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wanninkhof, R., Asher, W. E., Ho, D. T., Sweeney, C., and McGillis, W. R.:
Advances in quantifying air–sea gas exchange and environmental forcing, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 1, 213–244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163742" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.marine.010908.163742</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
      
Weiss, R. F.:
Carbon dioxide in water and seawater: the solubility of a non-ideal gas, Mar. Chem., 2, 203–215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(74)90015-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4203(74)90015-2</a>, 1974.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woolf, D. K.:
Bubbles and the air–sea transfer velocity of gases, Atmos. Ocean, 31, 517–540, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1993.9649484" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.1993.9649484</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woolf, D. K.:
Bubbles and their role in gas exchange, in: The Sea Surface and Global Change, edited by: Liss P. S. and Duce R. A., 173–206, Cambridge University Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525025.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511525025.007</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woolf, D. K.:
Parametrization of gas transfer velocities and sea-state-dependent wave breaking, Tellus B, 57, 87, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v57i2.16783" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v57i2.16783</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
      
Woolf, D. K., Land, P. E., Shutler, J. D., Goddijn-Murphy, L. M., and Donlon, C. J.:
On the calculation of air–sea fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> in the presence of temperature and salinity gradients, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 121, 1229–1248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011427" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JC011427</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wurl, O., Wurl, E., Miller, L., Johnson, K., and Vagle, S.:
Formation and global distribution of sea-surface microlayers, Biogeosciences, 8, 121–135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-121-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-8-121-2011</a>, 2011.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, M., Smyth, T. J., Kitidis, V., Brown, I. J., Wohl, C., Yelland, M. J., and Bell, T. G.:
Natural variability in air–sea gas transfer efficiency of CO<sub>2</sub>, Sci. Rep., 11, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92947-w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92947-w</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, M., Bell, T. G., Bidlot, J. R., Blomquist, B. W., Butterworth, B. J., Dong, Y., Fairall, C. W., Landwehr, S., Marandino, C. A., Miller, S. D., Saltzman, E. S., and Zavarsky, A.:
Global synthesis of air-Sea CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity estimates from ship-based eddy covariance measurements, Front. Mar. Sci., 9, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826421" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.826421</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, M., Moffat, D., Dong, Y., and Bidlot, J.-R.:
Deciphering the variability in air–sea gas transfer due to sea state and wind history, PNAS Nexus, pgae389, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae389" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae389</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, D., Toba, Y., Suzuki, Y., and Komori, S.:
Effect of wind waves on air–sea gas exchange: Proposal of an overall CO<sub>2</sub> transfer velocity formula as a function of breaking-wave parameter, Tellus B, 55, 478–487, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v55i2.16747" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v55i2.16747</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
