<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-5427-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Aging of droplet size distribution in stratocumulus clouds: regimes of droplet size distribution evolution</article-title><alt-title>Aging of droplet size distribution in stratocumulus clouds</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Lim</surname><given-names>Jung-Sub</given-names></name>
          <email>jung-sub.lim@noaa.gov</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-0009</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Hoffmann</surname><given-names>Fabian</given-names></name>
          <email>f.hoffmann@fu-berlin.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5136-0653</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Meteorologisches Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>a</label><institution>now at: NOAA Chemical Science Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>b</label><institution>now at: Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Jung-Sub Lim (jung-sub.lim@noaa.gov) and Fabian Hoffmann (f.hoffmann@fu-berlin.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>22</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>5427</fpage><lpage>5446</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Jung-Sub Lim</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e114">The climatic impact of maritime stratocumulus clouds depends on the evolution of their droplet size distribution (DSD), yet the mechanisms controlling their variability during evaporation remain poorly constrained. Using large-eddy simulations coupled with a Lagrangian cloud model, we demonstrate that the DSD evolution follows two primary regimes: adiabatic growth and entrainment–descent. Within the latter, DSD evolution follows divergent pathways determined by the parcel's entrainment history: strong entrainment-driven dilution near the cloud top causes rapid broadening, whereas large-scale boundary-layer descent leads to gradual evaporation. Our Lagrangian analysis of the Damköhler number reveals that the commonly observed vertical transition from inhomogeneous to homogeneous mixing signatures does not necessarily reflect a change in the local mixing mechanism. Instead, it results from the vertical sorting of parcels with divergent histories. Parcels subject to strong entrainment retain inhomogeneous signatures throughout their descent, while those experiencing minimal dilution exhibit homogeneous-like characteristics regardless of altitude. This distinction helps resolve ambiguities in interpreting in situ observations where mixing history is often unknown. Finally, we propose a combined analytical–empirical formulation that captures the relative dispersion during both growth and evaporation.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft</funding-source>
<award-id>HO 6588/1-1</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e126">Maritime stratocumulus (Sc) clouds play a key role in Earth's climate by cooling the planet through the reflection of large amounts of incoming solar radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.1"/>. Stratocumulus-topped boundary layers (STBLs) are characterized by a Rayleigh-Bénard-type circulation, driven predominantly by longwave radiative cooling at the cloud top <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This circulation is characterized by broad, cloud-laden updrafts and narrow, nearly cloud-free downdrafts known as <italic>cloud holes</italic> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. As droplets cycle through this dynamic environment, they undergo activation, condensational growth, entrainment-driven evaporation, and circulation-induced descent, leading to systematic changes in the droplet size distribution (DSD). The DSD fundamentally governs cloud optical properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.4"/> and precipitation initiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e152">To capture the time-dependent transformation of cloud microphysics, we define “DSD aging” as the temporal evolution of its shape. Although this concept has previously been introduced in the context of precipitation initiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.6"/>, we specifically use it here to describe the microphysical evolution of the DSD driven by condensation, evaporation, entrainment, and mixing. We characterize DSD aging using two key parameters: the arithmetic mean droplet radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the relative dispersion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), defined as the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean radius. The relative dispersion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the relative width of the size distribution. It is a key determinant of both cloud optical properties and rain initiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.7"/>, yet it is rarely predicted in conventional moment-based microphysical models. Therefore, understanding DSD aging within the STBL is essential for improving cloud–aerosol–precipitation interactions in climate models, as it links intricate DSD shapes to more predictable boundary layer dynamics.</p>
      <p id="d2e202">Previous studies indicate that the correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mean droplet size varies with dominant microphysical processes and environmental conditions, often shifting between positive and negative across different stages of droplet evolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.8"/>. We note that some prior studies utilize the volume-mean radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is weighted toward larger droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both metrics generally capture similar evolutionary trends in this context. Focusing on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, specifically within an adiabatically ascending parcel, condensational growth leads to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases. This occurs because smaller droplets grow faster, causing the DSD to narrow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.10"/>. This inverse relationship is well-characterized by existing analytical expressions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.11"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e312">However, during entrainment and mixing, the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> become more complex and less predictable. This complexity arises because entrainment is a non-adiabatic and intermittent process. The amount of free-tropospheric air that is entrained, the rate at which it mixes with cloudy air, and the timescale over which the mixture approaches thermodynamic equilibrium, all of which are critical for understanding how entrainment and mixing influence DSD shape, remain poorly constrained in both observations and models. In addition, the specific mixing scenario further complicates predictions. Under homogeneous mixing, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically decreases and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases as all droplets partially evaporate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.12"/>. In contrast, inhomogeneous mixing may leave both parameters largely unchanged while decreasing the droplet number concentration through the complete evaporation of some droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx21" id="paren.13"/>. Even <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can increase and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decrease in a “narrowing” mixing scenario as suggested in a recent study <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.14"/>. In situ measurements often reveal inhomogeneous mixing signatures near the cloud top and homogeneous characteristics below <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.15"/>. However, it remains unclear whether this reflects a true change in the physical mixing mechanism or results from other processes, such as dilution or the vertical sorting of parcels with different mixing histories. Therefore, to understand the spatiotemporal variability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in stratocumulus clouds, it is essential to resolve how entrainment and mixing interact with the Lagrangian history of the droplets.</p>
      <p id="d2e406">In this study, we employ the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.16"/>, a novel framework that combines large-eddy simulation (LES) with a linear eddy model (LEM) and a Lagrangian cloud model (LCM). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model explicitly resolves subgrid-scale (SGS) supersaturation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) fluctuations and turbulent mixing using the LEM, which mimics fine-scale turbulent stirring and scalar transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.17"/>. The LCM tracks individual hydrometeors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.18"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, represented as computational particles that stand in for ensembles of real droplets or aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.19"/>, thereby capturing detailed microphysical processes. This Lagrangian approach enables us to track individual particles along their trajectories through the STBL vertical circulation, capturing the evolving thermodynamic and microphysical conditions that govern droplet growth. In particular, it allows for a detailed quantification of how the DSD shape evolves along distinct pathways shaped by droplet activation, condensation, entrainment, mixing, and evaporation.</p>
      <p id="d2e453">This paper is structured as follows. Section 2 presents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model framework and simulation settings. Section 3 shows how the DSD shape parameters evolve in different regimes. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>, we discuss a method to predict <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in these regimes. Finally, we conclude our paper in Sect. 5. Parts of this study are based on the first author's dissertation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.20"/>, which has been extended with special attention to the impact of different mixing pathways (Sect. 3.3.3 and 3.4) and more general conclusions (Sect. 5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Model and Simulations</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model</title>
      <p id="d2e510">We employ the novel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.21"/>, built upon the System for Atmospheric Modeling (SAM), a nonhydrostatic, anelastic LES model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.22"/>. Cloud microphysical processes are modeled using the LCM, employing individually simulated computational particles, i.e. LCM particles, where each particle represents a group of identical hydrometeors. Additionally, the linear eddy model (LEM), an explicit turbulence and mixing model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.23"/>, is coupled with the LCM and LES to represent the unresolved effects of entrainment and mixing on droplet growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e536">In the Lagrangian Cloud Model (LCM), condensational growth of droplets is driven by the supersaturation,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M24" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the LES-resolved mean supersaturation is

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M25" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the LES-resolved water vapor mixing ratio, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the saturation vapor mixing ratio determined by the LES-resolved temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The fluctuation term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the deviation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and is tracked individually for each LCM particle, being updated continuously throughout its growth history. The LEM redistributes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> among the LCM particles by mimicking turbulent compression and folding based on the LES subgrid turbulence kinetic energy. Therefore, in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model, droplet condensational growth is determined by both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, allowing for a realistic representation of different mixing scenarios during entrainment and mixing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.25"/>. Moreover, the standard deviation of supersaturation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, defined as the standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is inherently resolved by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model. Further details on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> framework can be found in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.26"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Simulation Setup</title>
      <p id="d2e794">A maritime nocturnal Sc cloud is simulated based on the Second Dynamics and Chemistry of Marine Stratocumulus Field Study (DYCOMS-II) campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.27"/>, with fixed surface fluxes, subsidence, and a simple parameterization for longwave radiative cooling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.28"/>. The model domain is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.56</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> directions. We use a grid spacing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to resolve the energy-containing eddies and the sharp thermodynamic gradients across the entrainment interface layer. Unresolved scalar inhomogeneity and turbulent mixing that control droplet response are represented by the coupled LEM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.29"/>, which redistributes the particle-level supersaturation fluctuation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at an effective vertical resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LEM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LES</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see below). The model time step <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the total model integration time is 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The results are analyzed only for the last 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the simulation.</p>
      <p id="d2e967">The LCM particles, each representing the same number of hydrometeors, are initialized as sea-salt particles with dry radii randomly chosen from a log-normal distribution (geometric mean radius of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, a</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, geometric standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Initial aerosol number concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 100, and 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered, named N50, N100, and N200, respectively. Results are discussed mainly for the N100 case unless otherwise stated. Note that droplet sedimentation and collision–coalescence processes are not considered, as we focus on the evolution of the DSD shape in non-drizzling stratocumulus. Given the absence of drizzle, the maximum droplet radii are approximately 15, 12, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the N50, N100, and N200 cases, respectively. For droplets in the 5–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, terminal fall speeds are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.30"/>, which is negligible compared to typical turbulent vertical-velocity fluctuations near cloud top (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">w</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">O</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="altparen.31"/>). However, neglecting sedimentation may slightly alter droplet residence times and hence microphysical exposure near cloud top.</p>
      <p id="d2e1141">The LEM further complements the high resolution of the LES. In the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model, the vertical LES grid spacing (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LES</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the number of LCM particles per grid box (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) jointly determine the resolution of the LEM, defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LEM</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LES</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this simulation, we initialize 100 LCM particles per grid box, resulting in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>LEM</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of approximately 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which allows the model to represent fine-scale scalar inhomogeneity relevant for inhomogeneous mixing in stratocumulus within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> framework <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.32"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Lagrangian Particle Tracking</title>
      <p id="d2e1252">To explicitly resolve the microphysical histories of individual droplets, we implemented a Lagrangian particle-tracking algorithm within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model. Each LCM particle is assigned a unique identifier (ID) upon initialization, which is preserved throughout its lifecycle. For this study, we tracked 400 particles. At initialization, four distinct and equidistantly spaced vertical columns were selected across the domain. Within each column, one particle was randomly chosen from each of the lowest 100 vertical grid boxes, yielding 100 tracked particles per column. To manage data volume and focus exclusively on in-cloud evolution, we applied a conditional recording scheme: data were recorded only when a flagged particle resided within a grid box classified as cloudy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We used the first 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a spin-up period, during which the flagged particles were dispersed by boundary-layer turbulence and became nearly well mixed within the boundary layer. Particle output was then enabled, and the final 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used for analysis (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1312">These tracked particles function as “virtual observers”, although they remain microphysically active, undergoing condensation and evaporation indistinguishable from the standard LCM particles. At each time step, they sample the local thermodynamic conditions and record the bulk microphysical statistics of the droplet ensemble within their resident grid cell. Since particles typically undergo multiple cycles of entrainment and detrainment driven by turbulent vertical circulations, they often re-enter the cloud layer several times. Consequently, the effective number of in-cloud records is larger than the number of tracked LCM particles.</p>
      <p id="d2e1315">The recorded dataset includes each particle's Lagrangian state vector (unique ID, radius <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, multiplicity, supersaturation fluctuation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, three-dimensional velocity components, and position) together with the co-located Eulerian state variables, including pressure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, LES gridbox mean supersaturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>, temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and water vapor mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, properties derived from the full droplet population within the grid box, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, cloud droplet number concentration <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, supersaturation standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, were calculated and stored alongside the particle data. This approach ensures that the dataset captures the complete microphysical context of droplets, specifically during their residence in the cloud, filtering out the dry aerosol phase.</p>
      <p id="d2e1435">The resulting trajectories are recorded at a sampling interval equivalent to the model timestep (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). To mitigate the high-frequency noise inherent to Lagrangian trajectories in turbulent flows, these properties were smoothed using a Gaussian kernel filter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.33"/> with a window size of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during post-processing.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Dynamical and Mixing Characteristics of the STBL</title>
      <p id="d2e1483">We begin by characterizing the dynamical and mixing structure of the STBL. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a shows the mean vertical profile of two moist-adiabatically conserved variables: total water mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and liquid water potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The STBL consists of a well-mixed layer, characterized by high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the free troposphere with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and an entrainment interface layer (EIL) in between. The EIL is characterized by sharp gradients in both moisture and temperature, typically within a few tens of meters. It represents the transition zone where turbulent eddies from the boundary layer mix with overlying dry and warm free-tropospheric air. Based on the sharp contrast in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the boundary layer and the free troposphere, we adopt a mixing fraction,

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M92" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,bl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,ft</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,bl</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          which represents the fraction of free-tropospheric air mixed with boundary-layer air <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.34"/>. While calculating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields results highly correlated with those based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we select <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the conserved variable because it exhibits a more constant profile in the free troposphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a), making the choice of representative free-troposphere value easier.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1675"><bold>(a)</bold> Vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (red solid line) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (black solid line). Vertical cross-sections of <bold>(b)</bold> buoyancy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> mixing fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2400</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, presented as a snapshot at a simulation time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In panels <bold>(b–d)</bold>, the Lagrangian trajectory of a selected particle is overlaid as a thick black line, tracing its path from the entry point (red dot at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">298.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to its current position (white dot at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The thin black solid lines indicate where the cloud water mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1852">In this simulation, the reference values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,ft</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,bl</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are set to their initial values of 1.5 and 9.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, which remain nearly constant throughout the simulation. Note that turbulent fluctuations can cause local parcels to exhibit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values exceeding the domain-averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mtext>t,bl</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, resulting in slightly negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (accounting for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the total data; Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). These minor deviations reflect the natural physical variability within the boundary layer reservoir.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1947">Two-dimensional density histograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with black solid lines indicating the mean of each variable in bins of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2023">At the top of the STBL, stable stratification inhibits mixing between the boundary layer and the free troposphere. Consequently, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is also strongly stratified (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>d), with the most rapid change confined to the EIL, identifying this region as the primary site of entrainment and mixing. The cloud top and EIL are persistently negatively buoyant (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b), where the buoyancy is defined by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M124" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the gravitational acceleration, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the local and horizontally averaged virtual potential temperatures, respectively. The negative <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> arises from evaporative cooling during entrainment and longwave radiative cooling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx46" id="paren.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2122">High values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are rarely observed within the cloud interior. However, localized pockets of enhanced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can appear within the boundary layer, particularly near cloud holes and in descending branches of the STBL vertical circulation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>c). For example, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, cloud holes coincide with downdrafts and elevated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, possibly indicating the accumulation of previously entrained dry air.</p>
      <p id="d2e2214">While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can highlight regions influenced by entrainment, its relationship with microphysical variables such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is not straightforward. To explore this quantitatively, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> illustrates the relationships between various variables and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is negatively correlated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) occurring only in regions with very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to undiluted, nearly adiabatic cloud interiors. Notably, all panels show a dense cluster around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting a prevalence of nearly adiabatic cloud interior during both ascent and descent (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b). High values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are associated with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a range typically found in regions experiencing entrainment and mixing at the cloud top under near-neutral conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2391">Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>c and d show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to decrease and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to increase with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in regions that remain nearly adiabatic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). However, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the mean values flatten out, and the relationship becomes less clear: neither <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a strong or consistent dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This suggests that while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may correlate with microphysical variability in undiluted cloud regions, it alone cannot explain the droplet size evolution in environments influenced by entrainment and mixing. Therefore, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially under the influence of entrainment and mixing, it is essential to consider the full growth history of individual droplets.</p>
      <p id="d2e2509">To illustrate this approach, Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> show an example particle trajectory that captures a representative pathway within the STBL vertical circulation. Droplets along this path undergo four key microphysical stages: (i) activation near the cloud base, (ii) condensational growth in updrafts, (iii) entrainment and mixing at the cloud top, and (iv) descent, evaporation, and deactivation. These stages leave clear imprints on the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> generally increase with height in cloudy updrafts, a sharp decrease occurs near cloud holes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a and b), reflecting the effects of mixing and evaporation. In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a more complex distribution: it is typically lower inside clouds but increases near cloud top and cloud-hole boundaries (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>c), resembling the spatial structure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>d). In the following sections, we examine how particle histories shape distinct DSD aging regimes and control the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2611">Vertical cross-sections of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2400</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, presented as a snapshot at a simulation time of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The thick black line traces the Lagrangian history of a selected droplet, ending at its current position (white dot) at this instant and extending backward in time to its cloud entry point (red dot). The thin black lines in each panel indicate the cloud boundary defined by a mixing ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Droplet Evolution Pathways in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Phase Space</title>
      <p id="d2e2757">To further understand the evolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we analyze the droplet evolution in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a shows the frequency distribution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space obtained from three-dimensional model output, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are estimated from cloud droplets with radii <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> only. Overall, the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is inversely proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The high-frequency pattern visible in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a is divided into two distinct parts, which can be constrained by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). We define these as the “growth pathway” characterized by low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence condensational growth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c and d), and the “evaporation pathway” characterized by high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence evaporation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e and f). Thus, we expect a quasi-loop structure of droplet evolution from the growth pathway to the evaporation pathway. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b shows the LCM particle trajectories in this phase space, with black and green markers indicating the start and end points, respectively, and the corresponding frequency distribution in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c. Note that the high-density patterns resemble the two pathways identified in the model output frequency distribution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a). In this analysis, we treat each continuous in-cloud segment of a particle trajectory as an independent trajectory, as a single particle can enter the cloud multiple times. This results in a total of 384 trajectory segments. We confirm that the qualitative features of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> and other analyses presented later in this study (e.g. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>) remain unchanged when using subsets of 100, 200, or 400 trajectories, indicating that the results are robust with respect to sample size throughout the analysis.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3038"><bold>(a)</bold> Two-dimensional frequency histogram in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space. <bold>(b)</bold> Corresponding droplet evolution pathways (gray dotted lines) with start/end points in black/green. <bold>(c)</bold> The corresponding frequency distribution of droplet evolution pathways. <bold>(d)</bold> Conceptual schematic summarizing the composite evolution loop, constructed from the most frequently observed trajectory patterns in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space. Blue and red arrows represent the dominant directions of growing and decaying pathways, respectively, based on the Lagrangian trajectory. In each panel, 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles at each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) are indicated as solid lines in orange, magenta, red, and cyan, respectively. In panel <bold>(a)</bold>, the gray-shaded regions indicate areas where the sample count is below 10 000, which are masked for statistical robustness.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3119">The growth pathway can be described by

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M202" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, 0</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, 0</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          following the analytic solution proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.36"/>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, 0</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, 0</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the boundary values. Here, we use <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, 0</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, 0</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to show Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) as a cyan dashed line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a and b.</p>
      <p id="d2e3229">While Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) effectively captures the growth pathway, it fails to describe the evaporation pathway (Fig. A1). To approximate the latter, we utilize percentile-based diagnostics, where the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin provide a reasonable empirical representation of the evaporation pathway (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a–c), exhibiting an inverse trend between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In analogy to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), the fitted function is given as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M211" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m,max</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denote the maximum values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Each percentile line (p50, p75, and p90) can be represented by a distinct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value for the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (e.g. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a). For instance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches zero as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> approaches <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically occurs at much smaller droplet sizes (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), well below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m,max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A detailed discussion on this empirical formulation is provided in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Different Regimes of Droplet Evolution Pathways</title>
      <p id="d2e3485">In the previous section, we showed that droplet evolution pathways diverge depending on whether droplets grow or decay. To better characterize these differences, we analyze the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space in terms of the sign of the correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This analysis uses the particle trajectories shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b and c.</p>
      <p id="d2e3550">As already indicated above, the resulting patterns are closely tied to the supersaturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a and b, the phase space structure under all <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions can be decomposed into two dominant subsets based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second and third rows). While the droplet life cycle is a continuous process, we can classify it into four distinct regimes, each characterized by a dominant set of microphysical processes: A (<italic>activation</italic>) and B (<italic>adiabatic growth</italic>) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and C (<italic>entrainment and descent</italic>) and D (<italic>deactivation</italic>) for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, each of which corresponds to a dominant microphysical process. Although precipitation is another key process in DSD evolution, we focus on condensational growth and evaporation, examining phase-space-averaged microphysical and environmental properties across the four regimes (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>).</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3637">Two-dimensional binned mean values of the rates of change, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first column) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second column), in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space for all conditions (first row), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second row), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (third row). In each panel, the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile values (p50, p75, p90), and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> are indicated by solid lines in orange, magenta, red, and cyan, respectively. Each panel shows 2D binned mean values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space, based on Lagrangian trajectories smoothed with a Gaussian kernel (window <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and averaged over time.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3817">Two-dimensional binned mean values of cloud properties in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first and third row) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second and fourth row). <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show the frequency distributions, <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> show cloud water mixing ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> show cloud droplet number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(g)</bold> and <bold>(j)</bold> show the mean supersaturation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(h)</bold> and <bold>(k)</bold> show mixing fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(i)</bold> and <bold>(l)</bold> show net activation rate (activation rate  –  deactivation rate). In each panel, the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile values (p50, p75, p90), and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> are indicated by solid lines in orange, magenta, red, and cyan, respectively. Values represent bin-averaged means from 3D simulation results during the final 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of simulation, mapped onto the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3984">Two-dimensional binned mean values of cloud properties in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first and third row) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second and fourth row). <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show buoyancy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(e)</bold> show vertical velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold> show height (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(g)</bold> and <bold>(j)</bold> show kinetic dissipation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), <bold>(h)</bold> and <bold>(k)</bold> show supersaturation fluctuation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(i)</bold> and <bold>(l)</bold> show the evaporation rate. In each panel, the 50th, 75th, and 90th percentile values (p50, p75, p90), and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> are indicated by solid lines in orange, magenta, red, and cyan, respectively. Values represent bin-averaged means from 3D simulation results during the final 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of simulation, mapped onto the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>Activation Regime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e4172">In the <italic>activation regime</italic>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation is primarily positive (region A in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c and d), especially when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This regime is associated with droplet activation occurring in updrafts (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b) near the cloud base (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c), as indicated by high net activation rates (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>i). The corresponding increase in droplet number concentration (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>c) marks cloud formation. In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b, most particle trajectories initiate within this regime (black dots). During this phase, condensational growth increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while the time-dependent activation of aerosols with different critical supersaturations leads to an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This results in a transient broadening of the DSD, prior to narrowing due to subsequent condensational growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>Adiabatic Growth Regime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e4294">Following the <italic>activation regime</italic>, droplets enter the <italic>adiabatic growth regime</italic> (region B in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c and d), particularly when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this regime, cloud droplets grow by condensation within regions of high supersaturation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>g), strong updrafts (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b), and low mixing fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>h). Activation and deactivation are negligible (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>i), resulting in an almost constant droplet number concentration, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>c). The turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) remains low (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>g), indicating weak turbulence. In addition, the small standard deviation of supersaturation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>h), indicates a highly homogeneous supersaturation field, implying minimal entrainment and mixing-driven dilution of the cloudy air.</p>
      <p id="d2e4372">In this regime, the rates of change of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibit a negative correlation, reflecting classical condensational growth behavior: the radius of small droplets grows faster, narrowing the DSD as its mean size increases. This behavior aligns with parcel theory and is typically observed within the adiabatic cores of stratocumulus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.37"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <label>3.3.3</label><title>Entrainment and Descent Regime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e4460">After the <italic>adiabatic growth regime</italic>, droplets enter the <italic>entrainment and descent regime</italic> (region C in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e and f). In this regime, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> correlation becomes negative: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases due to evaporation caused either by mixing with entrained free-tropospheric air or by adiabatic heating during descent. Unlike in the previous regimes, where most droplets follow similar evolution pathways, droplet pathways diverge significantly in this regime (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b). Notably, for rare cases of very high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>e and f). These represent cases of narrowing mixing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.38"/>, wherein an extremely wide DSD narrows after mixing due to the substantial evaporation of small droplets, causing the average droplet size to increase.</p>
      <p id="d2e4573">While some droplets experience rapid altitude changes, following the STBL vertical circulation (indicated by the p50 line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>), others remain near the cloud top, close to the p90 line (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>f). These latter droplets exhibit weak vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e) within negatively buoyant air (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d) and are subject to stronger entrainment-driven dilution. This is indicated by high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>j), high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>k), low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>j), and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>k). Consequently, droplets in more diluted regions (near the p90 line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>k) undergo more abrupt evaporation and deactivation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>l) compared to those following the STBL vertical circulation (near the p50 line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b), which experience more gradual evaporation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>l) and lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>k).</p>
      <p id="d2e4651">To determine whether certain droplets escape the strong effects of entrainment and mixing (i.e. those following the downdrafts of the STBL vertical circulation with minimal dilution), we analyze the density distribution of maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values along individual droplet trajectories (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>). The maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated over each droplet's lifetime from activation to deactivation, serves as a proxy for the droplet's entrainment history, representing the maximum fraction of environmental air the parcel has experienced. Trajectories with a maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate a relatively minor impact from entrainment. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>, a notable fraction of parcels exhibit low maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values, suggesting that these are not substantially diluted by entrainment and mixing events near the cloud top. This is consistent with Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>, where some droplets descend without a significant decrease in supersaturation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>j and k) despite strong downdrafts (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e).</p>

      <fig id="F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e4715">Density distribution of maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual tracked particles over their lifetime in the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer. The 25th (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 75th (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">75</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) percentiles of the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicated with red dashed lines.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e4760">The diversity of pathways in the evaporation regime contrasts with the <italic>adiabatic growth</italic> regime, where droplets follow nearly uniform growth paths. In the <italic>entrainment and descent</italic> regime, trajectories diverge: some parcels are strongly diluted by entrainment (near the p90 line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e), while others experience minimal dilution, following the strong downdraft circulation (near the p50 line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e). To better understand the evolution of these diverse pathways and how microphysical properties diverge, we show changes in mixing-related properties for individual particle trajectories in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>). We categorized droplets based on the 25th (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 75th (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) percentiles of their maximum lifetime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>). Droplets within parcels subject to strong entrainment-driven dilution experience high maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first row), while the second and third rows show droplets with intermediate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) maximum values, respectively. In all cases, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains below 0.1 during ascent and increases when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, particularly for parcels with higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>c, f, and i).</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e4901">Particle trajectories in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space, where different colors of dots indicate: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (first column), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second column), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (third column). The first row shows trajectories with the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the third row shows trajectories where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the second row shows trajectories with intermediate values, where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lies between these two conditions. In panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, and <bold>(g)</bold>, the dashed black arrows indicate inferred droplet motion directions based on the vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e5002">While most droplets descend without experiencing a substantial decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, only a fraction are strongly diluted by entrainment, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>e). For these droplets, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases again after reaching its peak, indicating the restoration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> following turbulent mixing and evaporation, as well as further homogenization within the cloud. Notably, supersaturation fluctuation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reaches a maximum at the cloud top while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, further indicating entrainment and mixing. As <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases rapidly during mixing and evaporation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>b and c), these droplets descend and evaporate in a new state characterized by modified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Conversely, droplets that do not experience high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> descend with a continuous state obtained at the end of the <italic>adiabatic growth regime</italic>, characterized by maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>h and i).</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e5152">Particle trajectories in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space, where different colors of dots indicate: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first column), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (second column), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (third column). The first row shows trajectories with the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the third row shows trajectories where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the second row shows trajectories with intermediate values, where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lies between these two conditions. In panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, and <bold>(g)</bold>, the dashed black arrows indicate inferred droplet motion directions based on the vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e5254">Thus, for droplets within parcels subject to minimal dilution, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is primarily a function of altitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>h). At the same altitude, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is only slightly smaller at higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, regardless of whether the droplets are ascending or descending (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>g). Meanwhile, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger during descent (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>i), reflecting the broadening of the droplet size distribution due to evaporation in the absence of the collision-coalescence process. Along these trajectories, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> remains high, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remain low, suggesting that these droplets likely ascend and descend with negligible influence from entrainment. Furthermore, while both droplet groups undergo evaporation during descent, their initial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> differ based on whether they reached a new state after mixing. This divergence leads to distinct evolution paths in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space.</p>
      <p id="d2e5374">Another difference between the ascending and descending pathways is the evolution of droplet number concentration. To separate the decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> caused by simple entrainment dilution from that caused by mixing-induced evaporation, we examine the dilution-corrected number concentration, defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here, the subscript “ad” denotes the adiabatic value, representing the concentration expected in an undiluted parcel. Specifically, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is substantially lower at higher altitudes when parcels are strongly diluted by entrainment (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a) compared to those experiencing minimal dilution (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>g). This distinct reduction is also evident in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space, where parcels subject to strong entrainment-driven dilution exhibit a rapid decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ad</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a). This decrease, representing droplet loss beyond simple dilution, is consistent with inhomogeneous mixing, wherein some droplets completely evaporate in locally subsaturated environments while others remain relatively unaltered. The localized increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> further supports the conclusion that SGS supersaturation variability, as resolved by the LEM, drives this selective evaporation. These findings align with recent observational studies suggesting that inhomogeneous mixing signals are prevalent near the top of Sc clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.39"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5483">However, we cannot ensure that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has fully isolated the effects of evaporation from entrainment-driven dilution. While the spatial distribution of the mixing signal indicates stronger inhomogeneous characteristics near the cloud top and homogeneous-like features below, it is questionable whether changes observed in the lower cloud should be interpreted as a result of active entrainment, especially since the majority of parcels descending with the STBL vertical circulation experience minimal dilution through entrainment. These uncertainties highlight a fundamental ambiguity in interpreting in situ observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as indicators of mixing type, particularly when a precise estimation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is unavailable.</p>
      <p id="d2e5538">To resolve this ambiguity, the maps of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>) quantify the varying inhomogeneous and homogeneous mixing signals at the same height. Here, the Damköhler number is defined generally as

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M380" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>micro</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where the mixing timescale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.40"/> is

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M381" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mfrac><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the length scale of scalar inhomogeneity caused by entrainment, which breaks down to the Kolmogorov length scale through turbulent motion. Since the entrainment length scale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> varies with the size of the entrained blobs, we estimate the mixing length using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Notably, using the equivalent geometric LES grid lengthscale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as a proxy for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> results in a larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but does not alter the conclusions. The relevant microphysical timescales are the phase relaxation time

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><label>9</label><mml:math id="M389" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            and the evaporation timescale

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M390" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            defined only in subsaturated regions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.41"/>. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the molecular diffusion coefficient for water vapor, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the condensational growth parameter that summarizes the effects of vapor diffusion and heat conduction on condensation, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a coefficient associated with vapor diffusion, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, associated with heat conduction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.42"/>. Theoretically, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mo>≫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, turbulent mixing is slower than the microphysical response, favoring inhomogeneous mixing. Conversely, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mo>≪</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, turbulent mixing is fast enough to homogenize the subsaturated entrained air with the saturated cloud air before droplets respond, leading to homogeneous mixing.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e5944">Particle trajectories in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space, where different colors of dots indicate: the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first column), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second column), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (third column). The first row shows trajectories with the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the third row shows trajectories where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the second row shows trajectories with intermediate values, where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lies between these two conditions. In panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, and <bold>(g)</bold>, the dashed black arrows indicate inferred droplet motion directions based on the vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6057">While mixing scenarios have often been characterized using a single Damköhler number constructed from one microphysical response time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx5" id="paren.43"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, recent work has highlighted the limitations of such single-parameter descriptions and the need to consider multiple thermodynamic timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.44"/>. Therefore, we define two Damköhler numbers:

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M407" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext> and </mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            which represent the supersaturation relaxation-based and evaporation-based Damköhler numbers, respectively. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures how efficiently phase relaxation can restore supersaturation relative to turbulent mixing, whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures how efficiently droplets can evaporate before the mixed air is re-saturated. In addition, we use the ratio between the two Damköhler numbers, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is closely related to the parameter suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.45"/> and corresponds to the potential evaporation parameter of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.46"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6169">In the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> regime (first row of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>), parcels subject to strong entrainment-driven dilution frequently exhibit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b), alongside a ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≳</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>c). This combination is consistent with an inhomogeneous mixing scenario, in which a subset of droplets evaporates completely while the remaining droplets maintain a relatively large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As these parcels descend, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to decrease (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>a), whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains greater than unity (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>b). Consequently, reliance on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone might falsely indicate a transition toward homogeneous mixing during descent. The persistently high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, however, contradicts this interpretation. These parcels retain the signature of inhomogeneous mixing (depleted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) well below the cloud top, even as a consistent decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates no further active entrainment dilution but mixing with boundary layer air. This occurs because they descend through air that remains incompletely homogenized, creating an environment more subsaturated than would be expected from adiabatic descent alone.</p>
      <p id="d2e6330">In contrast, trajectories that remain in the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> regime throughout their lifetime (third row of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>) tend to occupy regions with smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>h) but relatively large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>g), and with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/>i). In this regime, phase relaxation is fast compared to both turbulent mixing and evaporation. This implies that adiabatic warming during descent is the primary source of droplet evaporation, without additional subsaturation caused by entrainment and dilution. These signatures are consistent with a homogeneous mixing-like response during descent, in which droplets gradually adjust <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under a comparatively uniform supersaturation field without a substantial decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, aside from weak entrainment-driven dilution at the cloud top. Moreover, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> generally decreases during the descent, this implies no further strong effect of entrainment dilution during the descent. Crucially, this implies that the homogeneous-mixing-like signature often observed deeper in the cloud is not necessarily due to active entrainment and mixing at that level. Instead, it reflects droplet evaporation in weakly diluted, near-adiabatic parcels descending via the STBL vertical circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.47"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e6426">The corresponding maps of the absolute timescales <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>) clarify why these diagnostics separate the regimes. The mixing timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies relatively modestly across the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>a and g), whereas <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibit much stronger spatial contrasts. Therefore, changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are driven mainly by the two microphysical timescales. The phase relaxation time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongly related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>: regions with strongly reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after complete evaporation events exhibit larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>b), while most other regions show much shorter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>h). The evaporation timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> behaves inversely, being large in nearly saturated regions and decreasing rapidly with increasing subsaturation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F12"/>c and i). Consequently, the ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> serves as a direct indicator of where complete droplet evaporation is likely. This ratio is significantly higher for high maximum-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parcels, reflecting their tendency toward complete evaporation, and remains much lower for low maximum-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> parcels until they reach the cloud base. Taken together, using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> provides a natural separation between regimes where droplets are prone to complete evaporation due to entrainment-induced dilution and regimes where supersaturation is restored quickly enough to prevent substantial droplet loss.</p>

      <fig id="F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d2e6663">Particle trajectories in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space, where different colors of dots indicate: the mixing timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (first column), the phase-change timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (second column), and the evaporation timescale <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (third column). The first row shows trajectories with the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the third row shows trajectories where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the second row shows trajectories with intermediate values, where the maximum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lies between these two conditions. In panels <bold>(a)</bold>, <bold>(d)</bold>, and <bold>(g)</bold>, the dashed black arrows indicate inferred droplet motion directions based on the vertical velocity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6769">These results highlight a contrast based on Lagrangian history. Parcels strongly diluted by entrainment near the cloud top are dominated by the inhomogeneous mixing signature. During descent, these parcels undergo gradual evaporation by adiabatic warming. Because of their greater subsaturation and decreased <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the droplets evaporate completely at a higher location in the cloud (Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>l and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>f). Conversely, weakly diluted parcels descending near-adiabatically via the STBL circulation show a homogeneous-mixing-like signature driven solely by evaporation in the adiabatically descending parcel, rather than by active mixing events. These distinct Lagrangian histories explain why snapshots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a given altitude can simultaneously contain the imprints of both inhomogeneous and homogeneous mixing signatures, even without active entrainment events.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS4">
  <label>3.3.4</label><title>Deactivation Regime (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d2e6831">Droplets transition into the <italic>deactivation regime</italic> at the end of their life cycle near the cloud base (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>f). In this regime, the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is complex, as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases for larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but decreases for smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is due to the evaporation of droplets. For larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> initially increases, as observed in the <italic>entrainment and descent</italic> regime. However, as the droplets approach complete evaporation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases since only a small number of droplets remain. Therefore, this regime is opposite to the <italic>activation regime</italic> with substantial deactivation (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>l). Note that this regime does not overlap with the <italic>activation regime</italic>, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are generally larger in the <italic>deactivation regime</italic> compared to the <italic>activation regime</italic>, indicating a stronger spatial variability in deactivation. Moreover, since particle trajectories are only tracked for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an abrupt loss of liquid water near the point of complete evaporation may result in a bias toward retaining large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values as the final recorded state.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Complete Expression of Droplet Evolution Pathway</title>
      <p id="d2e7043">As demonstrated in Sect. 3.2, the growth phase of droplet evolution follows the analytical solution (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) derived by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.48"/>, which is grounded in classical diffusional growth theory. Starting from the condensational growth equation

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M477" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        one may equivalently write <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, showing that condensational growth increases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at a rate set by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7146">To relate distribution width to the mean growth, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.49"/> define a relative deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Substituting this into Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E12"/>) and linearizing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields an evolution equation of the form (their Eq. (4))

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M486" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Averaging this over the droplet population yields their Eq. (5):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><label>14</label><mml:math id="M487" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e7379">By combining these two equations and using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this leads to

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><label>15</label><mml:math id="M489" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Integrating this relationship yields the characteristic inverse-square scaling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>), providing a quantitative expression of condensational narrowing during adiabatic ascent. For the full derivation, see <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.50"/> (their Eqs. 2–9).</p>
      <p id="d2e7515">However, this analytical formulation is insufficient for the decay phase (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), where evaporation and mixing induce nonlinear and path-dependent spectral broadening. While applying Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) to this regime captures the overall decreasing trend, it fails to reproduce the observed concave curvature, resulting in lower correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.8; see light-gray dashed line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/>). Given that an analytical derivation is complicated by the stochastic nature of entrainment, we instead formulate an empirical model based on geometric constraints. This model is constructed to satisfy two physical boundary conditions observed in our simulations: (1) a maximum dispersion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at the limit of small radii, and (2) a vanishing dispersion as the mean radius approaches a system maximum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), representing the spectral narrowing limit governed by condensational growth.</p>

      <fig id="F13" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d2e7575">Frequency distribution in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the <bold>(a)</bold> N50, <bold>(b)</bold> N100, and <bold>(c)</bold> N200 cases. Black dots represent the most frequent value (mode) in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin. The light-gray dashed line shows the fit of the analytical growth-phase equation (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data. The red lines represent the empirical fits for this evaporation pathway using the final quadratic formulation (the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> part of Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/> as solid and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> part of Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/> as dashed). All fits are based on the median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value in each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/5427/2026/acp-26-5427-2026-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e7704">To satisfy these conditions while capturing the observed curvature, we adopt a quadratic formulation. Combining the analytical growth term with this empirical decay formulation, we propose the following piecewise function for the complete evolution pathway:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E16" content-type="numbered"><label>16</label><mml:math id="M504" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="{" close=""><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="cases" columnspacing="1em" columnalign="left left" framespacing="0em"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, 0</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, 0</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, max</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>if </mml:mtext><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e7805">The results of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E16"/>), fitted to the 50th percentile of the frequency distributions over the final 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of simulation, are shown as solid lines in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F13"/> for the N50, N100, and N200 cases. The fitted values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 0.39, 0.40, and 0.41, respectively, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are 14.9, 11.8, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.4</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with all fits yielding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.98</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibits only modest variation across aerosol scenarios, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mtext>m, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases noticeably with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with liquid water being partitioned among a larger number of droplets. The relative insensitivity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>r, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that a fixed value in the range of 0.3–0.4, commonly observed in stratocumulus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.51"/>, may serve as a useful approximation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e7940">Maritime stratocumulus (Sc) clouds play an important role in Earth's radiative budget by reflecting incoming solar radiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.52"/>. However, our lack of understanding of the variation of key parameters determining the cloud's optical properties, such as the droplet size distribution (DSD), makes clouds a key source of model uncertainty <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.53"/>. In this study, we investigate the evolution of droplets, focusing on how DSD shape parameters, the mean droplet radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and droplet radius relative dispersion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), evolve by tracking individual cloud droplets. For this purpose, we employ the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> model that couples a large-eddy simulation (LES) model with a Lagrangian cloud model (LCM), and the linear eddy model (LEM) to accurately represent entrainment and mixing, a key process in determining DSD shape <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.54"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e7986">We find that the evolution of droplet size distribution (DSD) shape parameters follows characteristic trajectories in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space, governed by the large-scale circulation of the stratocumulus-topped boundary layer (STBL). Droplets undergo distinct transitions, including activation, condensational growth, entrainment-driven evaporation, and descent within downdrafts, each constituting a stage of an “aging” pathway. Based on supersaturation conditions, we classify the droplet population into four microphysical regimes as follows: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8013">Activation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): droplets activate, increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and broadening <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8062">Adiabatic growth (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, small <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): condensational growth narrows the DSD while increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, following the analytical parcel theory (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∝</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8123">Entrainment and descent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): evaporation drives a decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Critically, droplets in this regime do not follow a single pathway; their trajectories diverge in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase space depending on parcel-specific entrainment history (mixing fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e8191">Deactivation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, near cloud base): the final evaporation stage, where large droplets persist longer than small ones, briefly widening <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before full deactivation.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d2e8217">Importantly, this study helps resolve a fundamental ambiguity in interpreting mixing mechanisms in stratocumulus clouds. While vertical profiles of droplet number concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and mean radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) often suggest a transition from inhomogeneous mixing at cloud top to homogeneous mixing below <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx49" id="paren.55"/>, our trajectory-resolved analysis shows that much of this vertical structure arises from sorting of parcels with different entrainment histories within the STBL circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.56"/>. Specifically, the apparent mixing regime is controlled primarily by the Lagrangian entrainment history (summarized by the mixing fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) rather than instantaneous altitude. Parcels subject to strong entrainment-driven dilution (high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) exhibit robust inhomogeneous-mixing signatures at cloud top, characterized by a rapid reduction in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with only weak changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under strong subsaturation.</p>
      <p id="d2e8285">In contrast, the pervasive <italic>homogeneous-mixing-like</italic> signature at lower altitudes arises largely from parcels that descend adiabatically within the STBL downdrafts with minimal dilution (low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). In these parcels, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases mainly due to adiabatic warming during descent, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains approximately conserved, producing vertical profiles that mimic homogeneous mixing without requiring active entrainment and mixing at that level. These results demonstrate that interpretations based solely on Eulerian snapshots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can conflate local mixing with the imprint of pathway-dependent Lagrangian histories.</p>
      <p id="d2e8344">Consequently, to provide a more accurate assessment, we suggest using the evaporation-based Damköhler number <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or the timescale ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a better parameter for diagnosing mixing scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.57"/> than using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the single microphysical timescale. This approach is supported by the fact that inhomogeneous mixing is fundamentally controlled by whether a subset of droplets can completely evaporate. In particular, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>phase</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>evap</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends only on the microphysical state variables <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and does not require explicit knowledge of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mix</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, making it particularly attractive. While both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values indicate inhomogeneous mixing near the cloud top, each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates different mixing scenarios during descent without active entrainment events. Therefore, a single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">Da</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> may give a false classification of an inhomogeneous to homogeneous mixing scenario, but the combination of both can successfully indicate if the parcel is strongly diluted or not, which is useful to diagnose different entrainment-driven dilution histories.</p>
      <p id="d2e8467">While our regime classification spans the full vertical structure of the STBL, observational access to this regime space is inherently limited. As a result, the complete trajectory of DSD evolution remains poorly constrained in most field observations. Although some observational studies have reported phase-space patterns consistent with portions of our defined regimes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.58"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, comprehensive vertical coverage is needed to resolve the full aging pathway. Our Lagrangian framework overcomes this methodological limitation by providing a trajectory-resolved depiction of regime transitions across the full STBL depth, offering a coherent framework for interpreting in situ observations within the broader context of cloud evolution.</p>
      <p id="d2e8475">Building on these regime definitions, we propose an empirical formulation, combined with the analytical expression of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.59"/>, that expresses <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This formulation explicitly captures the inverse-square DSD narrowing governed by condensational growth and the nonlinear broadening driven by entrainment and dilution. This unified expression provides a practical framework for incorporating DSD aging variability into microphysical parameterizations in cloud models.</p>
      <p id="d2e8503">Our findings underscore the significance of DSD aging in preconditioning the onset of precipitation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.60"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Broader DSDs, shaped by diverse droplet growth pathways and entrainment-induced dilution and mixing histories, can enhance the potential for rain formation or reduce a cloud's ability to reflect incoming solar radiation. These results emphasize that droplet-scale evolution under varying thermodynamic and dynamic conditions governs not only the DSD shape but also key radiative and precipitation-relevant properties, highlighting the need for improved representation of DSD variability in large-scale models.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e8515">Simulation output used in this study is available from the author upon request. The System for Atmospheric Modeling (SAM) code is publicly available at <uri>http://rossby.msrc.sunysb.edu/SAM.html</uri> (last access: 14 April 2026).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e8524">JSL conceived the original conceptualization and interpretation of results and model modification. FH provided the base model, contributed to discussions, and provided the funding acquisition for the study and project administration. JSL wrote the original draft, and JSL and FH contributed to the review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e8530">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e8536">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e8542">The authors gratefully appreciate two anonymous reviewers who helped greatly improve the discussion of this paper. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Gauss Centre for Supercomputing e.V. (<uri>http://www.gauss-centre.eu</uri>, last access: 14 April 2026) for funding this project by providing computing time on the GCS Supercomputer SuperMUC-NG at the Leibniz Supercomputing Centre (<uri>http://www.lrz.de</uri>, last access: 14 April 2026).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e8553">This research has been supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant no. HO 6588/1-1).The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Freie Universität Berlin.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e8564">This paper was edited by Minghuai Wang and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ackerman et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation> Ackerman, A. S., van Zanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Savic-Jovcic, V., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., Golaz, J.-C., Jiang,  H., Khairoutdinov, M., Krueger, S. K., Lewellen, D. C., Lock, A., Moeng, C.-H., Nakamura, K., Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Weinbrecht, S., and Zulauf, M.: Large-eddy simulations of a drizzling, stratocumulus-topped marine boundary layer, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 1083–1110, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Baker and Latham(1979)</label><mixed-citation>Baker, M. and Latham, J.: The evolution of droplet spectra and the rate of production of embryonic raindrops in small cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1612–1615, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036%3C1612:TEODSA%3E2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036%3C1612:TEODSA%3E2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Baker et al.(1980)</label><mixed-citation>Baker, M., Corbin, R., and Latham, J.: The influence of entrainment on the evolution of cloud droplet spectra: I. A model of inhomogeneous mixing, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 106, 581–598, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644914" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49710644914</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, 571–657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Burnet and Brenguier(2007)</label><mixed-citation> Burnet, F. and Brenguier, J.-L.: Observational study of the entrainment-mixing process in warm convective clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1995–2011, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Chandrakar et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation> Chandrakar, K. K., Cantrell, W., and Shaw, R. A.: Influence of turbulent fluctuations on cloud droplet size dispersion and aerosol indirect effects, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 3191–3209, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Chandrakar et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Chandrakar, K. K., Morrison, H., and Witte, M.: Evolution of droplet size distributions during the transition of an ultraclean stratocumulus cloud system to open cell structure: an LES investigation using Lagrangian microphysics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100511, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022GL100511</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Chen et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation> Chen, T., Rossow, W. B., and Zhang, Y.: Radiative effects of cloud-type variations, J. Climate, 13, 264–286, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Considine and Curry(1996)</label><mixed-citation> Considine, G. and Curry, J. A.: A statistical model of drop-size spectra for stratocumulus clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 611–634, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Fries et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation> Fries, J., Sardina, G., Svensson, G., and Mehlig, B.: Key parameters for droplet evaporation and mixing at the cloud edge, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 2160–2172, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Gerber et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation> Gerber, H., Frick, G., Malinowski, S., Brenguier, J., and Burnet, F.: Holes and entrainment in stratocumulus, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 443–459, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Hoffmann and Feingold(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, F. and Feingold, G.: Entrainment and mixing in stratocumulus: effects of a new explicit subgrid-scale scheme for large-eddy simulations with particle-based microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1955–1973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0318.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-18-0318.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Hoffmann, F., Raasch, S., and Noh, Y.: Entrainment of aerosols and their activation in a shallow cumulus cloud studied with a coupled LCM–LES approach, Atmos. Res., 156, 43–57, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Hoffmann, F., Yamaguchi, T., and Feingold, G.: Inhomogeneous mixing in Lagrangian cloud models: effects on the production of precipitation embryos, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 113–133, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0087.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-18-0087.1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Jeffery(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Jeffery, C. A.: Inhomogeneous cloud evaporation, invariance, and Damköhler number, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008789" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008789</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Kerstein(1988)</label><mixed-citation>Kerstein, A. R.: A linear-eddy model of turbulent scalar transport and mixing, Combust. Sci. Tech., 60, 391–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208808923995" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00102208808923995</ext-link>, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Khairoutdinov and Randall(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060%3C0607:CRMOTA%3E2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060%3C0607:CRMOTA%3E2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Korolev and Mazin(1993)</label><mixed-citation> Korolev, A. and Mazin, I.: Zones of increased and decreased droplet concentration in stratiform clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol., 32, 760–773, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Krueger(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Krueger, S. K.: Linear eddy modeling of entrainment and mixing in stratus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 3078–3090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050%3C3078:LEMOEA%3E2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050%3C3078:LEMOEA%3E2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Krueger et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Krueger, S. K., Su, C.-W., and McMurtry, P. A.: Modeling entrainment and finescale mixing in cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2697–2712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2697:MEAFMI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2697:MEAFMI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Lehmann et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Lehmann, K., Siebert, H., and Shaw, R. A.: Homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing in cumulus clouds: dependence on local turbulence structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3641–3659, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3012.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JAS3012.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Lim(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Lim, J. S.: Entrainment, mixing, and the evolution of the cloud droplet size distribution, PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5282/edoc.34534" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5282/edoc.34534</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Lim and Hoffmann(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Lim, J.-S. and Hoffmann, F.: Between broadening and narrowing: how mixing affects the width of the droplet size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037900, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037900" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2022JD037900</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Lim and Hoffmann(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Lim, J.-S. and Hoffmann, F.: Life cycle evolution of mixing in shallow cumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD040393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD040393</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Liu and Daum(2004)</label><mixed-citation> Liu, Y. and Daum, P. H.: Parameterization of the autoconversion process. Part I: Analytical formulation of the Kessler-type parameterizations, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1539–1548, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Liu et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Liu, Y., Daum, P. H., and Yum, S. S.: Analytical expression for the relative dispersion of the cloud droplet size distribution, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Liu et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, Y., Daum, P. H., Guo, H., and Peng, Y.: Dispersion bias, dispersion effect, and the aerosol–cloud conundrum, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045021</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Lu et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation> Lu, C., Liu, Y., Zhu, B., Yum, S. S., Krueger, S. K., Qiu, Y., Niu, S., and Luo, S.: On which microphysical time scales to use in studies of entrainment-mixing mechanisms in clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 3740–3756, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Lu et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation> Lu, C., Sun, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, G. J., Lin, Y., Gao, W., Niu, S., Yin, Y., Qiu, Y., and Jin, L.: Observational relationship between entrainment rate and environmental relative humidity and implications for convection parameterization, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13–495, 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lu et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Lu, C., Liu, Y., Yum, S. S., Chen, J., Zhu, L., Gao, S., Yin, Y., Jia, X., and Wang, Y.: Reconciling contrasting relationships between relative dispersion and volume-mean radius of cloud droplet size distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031868</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Luo et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Luo, S., Lu, C., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Gao, W., Qiu, Y., Xu, X., Li, J., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., Wu, J., and Yang, X.: Relationships between cloud droplet spectral relative dispersion and entrainment rate and their impacting factors, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 2087–2106, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1419-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-022-1419-5</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Mellado(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Mellado, J. P.: Cloud-top entrainment in stratocumulus clouds, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 49, 145–169, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Pawlowska et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Pawlowska, H., Grabowski, W. W., and Brenguier, J.-L.: Observations of the width of cloud droplet spectra in stratocumulus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026841" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026841</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Pinsky et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Pinsky, M., Khain, A., Korolev, A., and Magaritz-Ronen, L.: Theoretical investigation of mixing in warm clouds – Part 2: Homogeneous mixing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9255–9272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9255-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-9255-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Seifert and Beheng(2006)</label><mixed-citation> Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Shima et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Shima, S., Kusano, K., Kawano, A., Sugiyama, T., and Kawahara, S.: The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: a particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1307–1320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.441</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Siebesma et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation> Siebesma, A. P., Jakob, C., Lenderink, G., Neggers, R. A. J., Teixeira, J., Van Meijgaard, E., Calvo, J., Chlond, A., Grenier, H., Jones, C., Köhler, M., Kitagawa, H., Marquet, P., Lock, A. P., Müller, F., Olmeda, D., and Severijns, C.: Cloud representation in general-circulation models over the northern Pacific Ocean: a EUROCS intercomparison study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 3245–3267, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Squires(1952)</label><mixed-citation>Squires, P.: The growth of cloud drops by condensation. I. General characteristics, Aust. J. Chem., 5, 59–86, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9520059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/CH9520059</ext-link>, 1952.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Stevens(2002)</label><mixed-citation> Stevens, B.: Entrainment in stratocumulus-topped mixed layers, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 2663–2690, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Stevens et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Stevens, B., Lenschow, D. H., Vali, G., Gerber, H., Bandy, A., Blomquist, B., Brenguier, J.-L., Bretherton, C. S., Burnet, F., Campos, T., Chai, S., Faloona, I., Friesen, D., Haimov, S., Laursen, K., Lilly, D. K., Loehrer, S. M., Malinowski, S. P., Morley, B., Petters, M. D., Rogers, D. C., Russell, L., Savic-Jovcic, V., Snider, J. R., Straub, D., Szumowski, M. J., Takagi, H., Thornton, D. C., Tschudi, M., Twohy, C., Wetzel, M., and van Zanten, M. C.: Dynamics and chemistry of marine stratocumulus – DYCOMS-II, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 579–594, 2003.  </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Telford and Chai(1980)</label><mixed-citation> Telford, J. W. and Chai, S. K.: A new aspect of condensation theory, Pure Appl. Geophys., 118, 720–742, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Tölle and Krueger(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Tölle, M. H. and Krueger, S. K.: Effects of entrainment and mixing on droplet size distributions in warm cumulus clouds, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 281–299, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2012MS000209" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2012MS000209</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Virtanen et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, İ., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro, A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors: SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods, 17, 261–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Wang et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Daum, P. H., Yum, S. S., Liu, Y., Senum, G. I., Lu, M.-L., Seinfeld, J. H., and Jonsson, H.: Observations of marine stratocumulus microphysics and implications for processes controlling droplet spectra: results from the Marine Stratus/Stratocumulus Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011035</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Wang et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Zhao, C., McFarquhar, G. M., Wu, W., Reeves, M., and Li, J.: Dispersion of droplet size distributions in supercooled non-precipitating stratocumulus from aircraft observations obtained during the southern ocean cloud radiation aerosol transport experimental study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033720" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033720</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Wood(2012)</label><mixed-citation> Wood, R.: Stratocumulus clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2373–2423, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Yang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Yang, F., Shaw, R., and Xue, H.: Conditions for super-adiabatic droplet growth after entrainment mixing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9421–9433, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9421-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-9421-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Yau and Rogers(1996)</label><mixed-citation> Yau, M. K. and Rogers, R. R.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics, Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-7506-3215-7, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Yeom et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Yeom, J. M., Yum, S. S., Shaw, R. A., La, I., Wang, J., Lu, C., Liu, Y., Mei, F., Schmid, B., and Matthews, A.: Vertical variations of cloud microphysical relationships in marine stratocumulus clouds observed during the ACE-ENA campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034700" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021JD034700</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Yum et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation> Yum, S. S., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Senum, G., Springston, S., McGraw, R., and Yeom, J. M.: Cloud microphysical relationships and their implication on entrainment and mixing mechanism for the stratocumulus clouds measured during the VOCALS project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 5047–5069, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Aging of droplet size distribution in stratocumulus clouds: regimes of droplet size distribution evolution</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ackerman et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Ackerman, A. S., van Zanten, M. C., Stevens, B., Savic-Jovcic, V., Bretherton, C. S., Chlond, A., Golaz, J.-C., Jiang,  H., Khairoutdinov, M., Krueger, S. K., Lewellen, D. C., Lock, A., Moeng, C.-H., Nakamura, K., Petters, M. D., Snider, J. R., Weinbrecht, S., and Zulauf, M.: Large-eddy simulations of a drizzling, stratocumulus-topped marine boundary layer, Mon. Weather Rev., 137, 1083–1110, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baker and Latham(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
       Baker, M. and Latham, J.: The evolution of droplet spectra and the rate of production of embryonic raindrops in small cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 1612–1615, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036%3C1612:TEODSA%3E2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1979)036%3C1612:TEODSA%3E2.0.CO;2</a>, 1979.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Baker et al.(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
       Baker, M., Corbin, R., and Latham, J.: The influence of entrainment on the evolution of cloud droplet spectra: I. A model of inhomogeneous mixing, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 106, 581–598, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644914" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710644914</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, 571–657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.016</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Burnet and Brenguier(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Burnet, F. and Brenguier, J.-L.: Observational study of the entrainment-mixing process in warm convective clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 1995–2011, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Chandrakar et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chandrakar, K. K., Cantrell, W., and Shaw, R. A.: Influence of turbulent fluctuations on cloud droplet size dispersion and aerosol indirect effects, J. Atmos. Sci., 75, 3191–3209, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chandrakar et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chandrakar, K. K., Morrison, H., and Witte, M.: Evolution of droplet size distributions during the transition of an ultraclean stratocumulus cloud system to open cell structure: an LES investigation using Lagrangian microphysics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 49, e2022GL100511, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100511</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Chen et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, T., Rossow, W. B., and Zhang, Y.: Radiative effects of cloud-type variations, J. Climate, 13, 264–286, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Considine and Curry(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
       Considine, G. and Curry, J. A.: A statistical model of drop-size spectra for stratocumulus clouds, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 611–634, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Fries et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Fries, J., Sardina, G., Svensson, G., and Mehlig, B.: Key parameters for droplet evaporation and mixing at the cloud edge, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 147, 2160–2172, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Gerber et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
       Gerber, H., Frick, G., Malinowski, S., Brenguier, J., and Burnet, F.: Holes and entrainment in stratocumulus, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 443–459, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Hoffmann and Feingold(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hoffmann, F. and Feingold, G.: Entrainment and mixing in stratocumulus: effects of a new explicit subgrid-scale scheme for large-eddy simulations with particle-based microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 1955–1973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0318.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0318.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hoffmann, F., Raasch, S., and Noh, Y.: Entrainment of aerosols and their activation in a shallow cumulus cloud studied with a coupled LCM–LES approach, Atmos. Res., 156, 43–57, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Hoffmann et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hoffmann, F., Yamaguchi, T., and Feingold, G.: Inhomogeneous mixing in Lagrangian cloud models: effects on the production of precipitation embryos, J. Atmos. Sci., 76, 113–133, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0087.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-18-0087.1</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Jeffery(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Jeffery, C. A.: Inhomogeneous cloud evaporation, invariance, and Damköhler number, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008789" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008789</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Kerstein(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kerstein, A. R.: A linear-eddy model of turbulent scalar transport and mixing, Combust. Sci. Tech., 60, 391–421, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208808923995" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00102208808923995</a>, 1988.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Khairoutdinov and Randall(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
       Khairoutdinov, M. F. and Randall, D. A.: Cloud resolving modeling of the ARM summer 1997 IOP: model formulation, results, uncertainties, and sensitivities, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 607–625, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060%3C0607:CRMOTA%3E2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060%3C0607:CRMOTA%3E2.0.CO;2</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Korolev and Mazin(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
       Korolev, A. and Mazin, I.:
Zones of increased and decreased droplet concentration in stratiform clouds,
J. Appl. Meteorol., 32, 760–773, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Krueger(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
       Krueger, S. K.: Linear eddy modeling of entrainment and mixing in stratus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 50, 3078–3090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050%3C3078:LEMOEA%3E2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050%3C3078:LEMOEA%3E2.0.CO;2</a>, 1993.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Krueger et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
       Krueger, S. K., Su, C.-W., and McMurtry, P. A.: Modeling entrainment and finescale mixing in cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 2697–2712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2697:MEAFMI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1997)054&lt;2697:MEAFMI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Lehmann et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lehmann, K., Siebert, H., and Shaw, R. A.: Homogeneous and inhomogeneous mixing in cumulus clouds: dependence on local turbulence structure, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3641–3659, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3012.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAS3012.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Lim(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lim, J. S.: Entrainment, mixing, and the evolution of the cloud droplet size distribution, PhD thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5282/edoc.34534" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5282/edoc.34534</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Lim and Hoffmann(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lim, J.-S. and Hoffmann, F.: Between broadening and narrowing: how mixing affects the width of the droplet size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2022JD037900, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037900" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037900</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Lim and Hoffmann(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lim, J.-S. and Hoffmann, F.: Life cycle evolution of mixing in shallow cumulus clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2023JD040393, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD040393</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Liu and Daum(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, Y. and Daum, P. H.: Parameterization of the autoconversion process. Part I: Analytical formulation of the Kessler-type parameterizations, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1539–1548, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Liu et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, Y., Daum, P. H., and Yum, S. S.: Analytical expression for the relative dispersion of the cloud droplet size distribution, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Liu et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, Y., Daum, P. H., Guo, H., and Peng, Y.: Dispersion bias, dispersion effect, and the aerosol–cloud conundrum, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 045021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045021</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Lu et al.(2018a)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lu, C., Liu, Y., Zhu, B., Yum, S. S., Krueger, S. K., Qiu, Y., Niu, S., and Luo, S.: On which microphysical time scales to use in studies of entrainment-mixing mechanisms in clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 3740–3756, 2018a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Lu et al.(2018b)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lu, C., Sun, C., Liu, Y., Zhang, G. J., Lin, Y., Gao, W., Niu, S., Yin, Y., Qiu, Y., and Jin, L.: Observational relationship between entrainment rate and environmental relative humidity and implications for convection parameterization, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 13–495, 2018b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lu et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lu, C., Liu, Y., Yum, S. S., Chen, J., Zhu, L., Gao, S., Yin, Y., Jia, X., and Wang, Y.: Reconciling contrasting relationships between relative dispersion and volume-mean radius of cloud droplet size distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031868</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Luo et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Luo, S., Lu, C., Liu, Y., Li, Y., Gao, W., Qiu, Y., Xu, X., Li, J., Zhu, L., Wang, Y., Wu, J., and Yang, X.: Relationships between cloud droplet spectral relative dispersion and entrainment rate and their impacting factors, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 39, 2087–2106, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1419-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-1419-5</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Mellado(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Mellado, J. P.: Cloud-top entrainment in stratocumulus clouds, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 49, 145–169, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Pawlowska et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
       Pawlowska, H., Grabowski, W. W., and Brenguier, J.-L.: Observations of the width of cloud droplet spectra in stratocumulus, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026841" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026841</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Pinsky et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Pinsky, M., Khain, A., Korolev, A., and Magaritz-Ronen, L.: Theoretical investigation of mixing in warm clouds – Part 2: Homogeneous mixing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9255–9272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9255-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9255-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Seifert and Beheng(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
       Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: Model description, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Shima et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Shima, S., Kusano, K., Kawano, A., Sugiyama, T., and Kawahara, S.: The super-droplet method for the numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation: a particle-based and probabilistic microphysics model coupled with a non-hydrostatic model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 135, 1307–1320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.441</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Siebesma et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
       Siebesma, A. P., Jakob, C., Lenderink, G., Neggers, R. A. J., Teixeira, J., Van Meijgaard, E., Calvo, J., Chlond, A., Grenier, H., Jones, C., Köhler, M., Kitagawa, H., Marquet, P., Lock, A. P., Müller, F., Olmeda, D., and Severijns, C.: Cloud representation in general-circulation models over the northern Pacific Ocean: a EUROCS intercomparison study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 130, 3245–3267, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Squires(1952)</label><mixed-citation>
       Squires, P.: The growth of cloud drops by condensation. I. General characteristics, Aust. J. Chem., 5, 59–86, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9520059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9520059</a>, 1952.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Stevens(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
       Stevens, B.: Entrainment in stratocumulus-topped mixed layers, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 128, 2663–2690, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Stevens et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
       Stevens, B., Lenschow, D. H., Vali, G., Gerber, H., Bandy, A., Blomquist, B., Brenguier, J.-L., Bretherton, C. S., Burnet, F., Campos, T., Chai, S., Faloona, I., Friesen, D., Haimov, S., Laursen, K., Lilly, D. K., Loehrer, S. M., Malinowski, S. P., Morley, B., Petters, M. D., Rogers, D. C., Russell, L., Savic-Jovcic, V., Snider, J. R., Straub, D., Szumowski, M. J., Takagi, H., Thornton, D. C., Tschudi, M., Twohy, C., Wetzel, M., and van Zanten, M. C.: Dynamics and chemistry of marine stratocumulus – DYCOMS-II, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 579–594, 2003.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Telford and Chai(1980)</label><mixed-citation>
       Telford, J. W. and Chai, S. K.: A new aspect of condensation theory, Pure Appl. Geophys., 118, 720–742, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Tölle and Krueger(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       Tölle, M. H. and Krueger, S. K.: Effects of entrainment and mixing on droplet size distributions in warm cumulus clouds, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 281–299, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2012MS000209" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2012MS000209</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Virtanen et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., van der Walt, S. J., Brett, M., Wilson, J., Millman, K. J., Mayorov, N., Nelson, A. R. J., Jones, E., Kern, R., Larson, E., Carey, C. J., Polat, İ., Feng, Y., Moore, E. W., VanderPlas, J., Laxalde, D., Perktold, J., Cimrman, R., Henriksen, I., Quintero, E. A., Harris, C. R., Archibald, A. M., Ribeiro, A. H., Pedregosa, F., van Mulbregt, P., and SciPy 1.0 Contributors: SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods, 17, 261–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Wang et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, J., Daum, P. H., Yum, S. S., Liu, Y., Senum, G. I., Lu, M.-L., Seinfeld, J. H., and Jonsson, H.: Observations of marine stratocumulus microphysics and implications for processes controlling droplet spectra: results from the Marine Stratus/Stratocumulus Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011035</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Wang et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, Y., Zhao, C., McFarquhar, G. M., Wu, W., Reeves, M., and Li, J.: Dispersion of droplet size distributions in supercooled non-precipitating stratocumulus from aircraft observations obtained during the southern ocean cloud radiation aerosol transport experimental study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033720" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033720</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Wood(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
       Wood, R.: Stratocumulus clouds, Mon. Weather Rev., 140, 2373–2423, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Yang et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, F., Shaw, R., and Xue, H.: Conditions for super-adiabatic droplet growth after entrainment mixing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9421–9433, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9421-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9421-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Yau and Rogers(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yau, M. K. and Rogers, R. R.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics, Elsevier, ISBN 978-0-7506-3215-7, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Yeom et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yeom, J. M., Yum, S. S., Shaw, R. A., La, I., Wang, J., Lu, C., Liu, Y., Mei, F., Schmid, B., and Matthews, A.: Vertical variations of cloud microphysical relationships in marine stratocumulus clouds observed during the ACE-ENA campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2021JD034700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034700" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD034700</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Yum et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yum, S. S., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Senum, G., Springston, S., McGraw, R., and Yeom, J. M.: Cloud microphysical relationships and their implication on entrainment and mixing mechanism for the stratocumulus clouds measured during the VOCALS project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 5047–5069, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
