<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-4841-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Tropospheric low ozone and its diurnal cycle  over the Western Pacific warm pool from  solar absorption FTIR observations</article-title><alt-title>Tropospheric low ozone and its diurnal cycle over the Western Pacific warm pool</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>Xiaoyu</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9365-3171</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Palm</surname><given-names>Mathias</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Katrin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6891-6889</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ji</surname><given-names>Denghui</given-names></name>
          <email>denghui_ji@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Patris</surname><given-names>Sharon</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Notholt</surname><given-names>Justus</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Physics, University of Bremen, Otto-Hahn-Allee 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Coral Reef Research Foundation, 96940 Koror, Palau</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Denghui Ji (denghui_ji@iup.physik.uni-bremen.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>4841</fpage><lpage>4861</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>4</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Xiaoyu Sun et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e144">We present observations of the daytime diurnal cycle of tropospheric column ozone over Palau in the tropical Pacific Warm Pool, based on high-resolution solar absorption Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometry during September–October 2022. The tropospheric column-averaged ozone (surface–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) showed a distinct diurnal cycle, with concentrations increasing from morning to a midday maximum and declining in the afternoon, primarily reflecting near-surface variability. Relative comparisons with ozonesonde profiles confirm this diurnal pattern. GEOS-Chem model simulations reproduce the daily mean variability but are not able to capture the observed diurnal cycle, underscoring the need for improved representation of local photochemistry and boundary-layer processes in models.</p>

      <p id="d2e155">Palau exhibited persistently low column-averaged ozone between 20–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the campaign period, reflecting limited precursor availability, efficient convective washout, and advection of clean marine air from the eastern Pacific. Satellite and reanalysis data indicate low aerosol loadings and large cloud droplets, which suppress convective electrification and reduce lightning activity. With lightning providing a key natural source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, this suppression limits upper-tropospheric ozone and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. GEOS-Chem sensitivity simulations confirm that removing Lightning emissions further decreases both species, underscoring how aerosol–cloud interactions indirectly shape a chemically low-oxidizing environment. Given that the Tropical Western Pacific (TWP) is a major pathway for troposphere-to-stratosphere transport, the persistence of low ozone and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests that air can ascend into the stratosphere before reactive species are removed by oxidation, thereby influencing the chemical composition of the lower stratosphere.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>Universität Bremen</funding-source>
<award-id>0100295604</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e202">Ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a trace gas of major importance in the atmosphere due to its adverse effects on human health, vegetation, and climate. Exposure to elevated surface ozone levels has been linked to respiratory and cardiovascular illnesses, posing a serious threat to public health, especially in polluted urban areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.1"/>. Ozone is also phytotoxic, damaging plant tissues, inhibiting photosynthesis, and reducing agricultural productivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.2"/>. In terms of climate, tropospheric ozone is a potent short-lived climate forcer, contributing significantly to radiative forcing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.3"/>. In the stratosphere, ozone plays a crucial role in shielding the Earth from harmful ultraviolet (UV) radiation, and its depletion, most notably in polar regions, has led to substantial changes in stratospheric temperature and circulation patterns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.4"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e228">In the troposphere, ozone is primarily produced by photochemical oxidation of precursor gases such as methane (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), carbon monoxide (CO), and non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) in the presence of nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and sufficient solar radiation. Besides in situ production, ozone concentrations can also be elevated through episodic downward transport from the stratosphere, or transporting ozone from other non-local tropospheric source regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.5"/>, which remains a key topic in understanding the mid-tropospheric ozone distribution in the TWP. Ozone in the troposphere is removed through several key processes. In the sunlit marine boundary layer, a major chemical sink of ozone is photolysis, followed by reaction of excited oxygen atoms with water vapor, producing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.6"/>. Additionally, ozone reacts with hydrogen oxide radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), leading to the formation of secondary products and reducing ozone concentrations, particularly in low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> environments such as the marine boundary layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.7"/>. The chemical lifetime of ozone in the marine boundary layer is relatively short (about 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.8"/>) and increases with altitude, further influencing the vertical ozone structure. In regions with strong convection, such as the tropics, ozone can also be rapidly transported to the upper troposphere and diluted or removed through convective outflow, often carrying ozone-poor air from the boundary layer.</p>
      <p id="d2e330">Many studies have explored the diurnal cycle of ozone, particularly in connection with surface-level photochemical production and removal processes (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx54" id="altparen.9"/>). These investigations span diverse environments, from urban centers to remote mountain observatories, and have revealed characteristic daily ozone maxima driven by solar radiation and precursor availability. In polluted continental areas, ozone typically shows nighttime minima due to dry deposition and titration by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the shallow nocturnal boundary layer, followed by afternoon peaks driven by photochemical production and mixing with ozone-rich residual layers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.10"/>. In contrast, mountain sites often exhibit a reversed cycle, with nighttime maxima resulting from coupling with the free troposphere and daytime minima caused by the upslope transport of ozone-poor air from the boundary layer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.11"/>. Over marine environments, especially under low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, photolysis, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry, and halogen reactions dominate, often leading to suppressed daytime ozone levels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.12"/>. While surface ozone variability is well documented, the diurnal cycle of ozone in the tropospheric column or vertical profiles has received far less attention. The variation and magnitude of free-tropospheric ozone or the tropospheric column are generally considered smaller than those near the surface, owing to weaker photochemistry and the absence of dry deposition, as indicated by aircraft in situ profiles over Frankfurt <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.13"/>. However, this has not been demonstrated in other regions, particularly in remote or oceanic environments, where conventional platforms such as balloon or aircraft campaigns provide limited temporal coverage.</p>
      <p id="d2e379">The tropical western Pacific (TWP) is a key region for studying tropospheric ozone variability, acting as a major pathway for troposphere-to-stratosphere transport via deep convection and the cold trap at the tropical tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.14"/>. This pathway regulates the chemical composition of air entering the stratosphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62" id="paren.15"/>. Convection and cirrus formation further influence vertical transport by modulating dehydration and radiative cooling near the tropopause <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.16"/>. A defining feature of the TWP is its persistently low ozone, accompanied by reduced hydroxyl radicals (OH) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx69" id="paren.17"/>. These conditions arise from high temperatures, abundant water vapor, and scarce precursors, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> environments, which favor ozone loss through reactions with hydrogen oxide radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx35" id="paren.18"/>. Consequently, the oxidative capacity is strongly reduced, lengthening trace-gas lifetimes and altering chemical processing of ascending air. Modeling studies suggest that such low-oxidizing conditions can even influence long-term stratospheric composition and reactivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx79" id="paren.19"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e437">In addition, lightning-generated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is typically a major source of upper-tropospheric ozone <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.20"/>. Global satellite lightning-climatology datasets (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx12" id="altparen.21"/>) show that lightning flash rates are generally lower over open ocean compared to continental regions. In the remote ocean, such as TWP, lightning activity is weak due to suppressed convective electrification, which has been supported by observation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.22"/>. This suppression is likely linked to low aerosol loading, which reduces cloud ice content and limits charge separation necessary for lightning initiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86" id="paren.23"/>. As a result, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio in the upper troposphere is low, further limiting in-situ ozone production and contributing to the ozone minimum at high altitudes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e472">Regular ozonesonde observations in the TWP from Palau (7.3° N, 134.5° E) have provided valuable in situ ozone profiles since 2016 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.25"/>, primarily capturing the long-term vertical structure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this region. Located in the heart of the tropical ozone minimum, this remote oceanic site offers a unique setting to investigate ozone variability. Building on this background, the present study introduces a new perspective by presenting the daytime diurnal cycle of tropospheric column ozone over Palau, based on high-resolution solar absorption Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectrometry. Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> describes the observation site and instrumentation, followed by retrieval methodology, data processing, and other data sources. In Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>, the diurnal ozone cycle observed from FTIR and its comparison with ozonesonde and GEOS-Chem simulations are presented, along with potential chemical and meteorological drivers. The broader implications and conclusions are summarized in Sects. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> and <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Method and data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Solar absorption FTIR spectrometry and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurement campaign</title>
      <p id="d2e526">Since 2015, the Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP), University of Bremen, and Alfred-Wegener-Institut (AWI), Potsdam, have conducted atmospheric observations at the Palau Atmospheric Observatory (PAO) in Koror, Palau (7.3° N, 134.5° E) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.26"/>. PAO is located on the Palau Community College (PCC) campus. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was measured by solar absorption Fourier Transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometry in September and October 2022. The information of the FTIR measurement are given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>. FTIR measurements have been performed in one of the PAO scientific containers using a Bruker IFS 120M spectrometer equipped with indium antimonide (InSb) since 2018. This allows to record spectra from 1900 up to 6000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In August 2022, Mercury Cadmium Telluride (MCT) was installed to cover the spectral region between 700–3000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.  The lower wavenumber region allows for the study of concentration profiles with higher precision, which is especially important for ozone.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e576">Information of FTIR ozone measurement in Palau. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">General information </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Site</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Palau</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 134.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">°</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">E</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time coverage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">09.2022–10.2022</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Altitude</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">l</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instrument</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bruker IFS 120M Spectrometer</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2">Retrieving Algorithm </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Software</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SFIT4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spectroscopy</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HITRAN 2020</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Retrieval microwindows (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1000.00–1000.08, 1001.00–1001.30, and 1003.16–1004.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A priori profile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WACCM V4 (fixed)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Retrieved interfering species</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <sup>668</sup><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <sup>686</sup><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">The mean degree of freedom (DOF)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e822">The FTIR spectra are recorded at a high spectral resolution up to 0.005 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by pointing the solar tracker at the sun during cloud-free weather conditions. The weather conditions can be actively monitored by the sky camera mounted above the window of the laboratory container to minimize the influence of clouds on solar absorption FTIR. We performed measurements throughout the day to record the spectrum from sunrise to sunset. The number of FTIR measurements contributing to each hourly bin ranges from 10 to 55, with the highest sampling between 11:00 and 14:00 LT. Each hourly bin includes measurements from multiple independent days (typically 3–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>). The spectra collected after 17:00 LT were excluded from our analysis due to shading from a tree adjacent to the laboratory container. The measurements during the campaign period were grouped by hour and averaged to evaluate the diurnal cycle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, we successfully obtained the ozone daytime diurnal cycle from 07:00 to 16:00 LT.</p>
      <p id="d2e870">The retrieval of trace gas concentrations from solar absorption FTIR spectra was performed using SFIT-4 (Spectra Least Squares Fitting) software. Spectral line parameters were taken from the high-resolution transmission molecular absorption database version 2020 (HITRAN2020) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.27"/>. A priori profiles were kept constant for the campaign and were from the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM V4). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was retrieved in three microwindows: 1000.00–1000.08, 1001.00–1001.30, and 1003.16–1004.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a simultaneous fit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other interfering species (Table. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>), retrieval strategy is consistent with the the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) framwork <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx78" id="paren.28"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e920">To quantify tropospheric ozone, we use the part of the retrieval corresponding to the tropospheric degree of freedom (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whose associated partial column averaging kernel (PC AVK) spans the vertical range from the surface to 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a, red curve). The vertical range we use in this study represents the low troposphere in the tropical region. This layer is used to calculate the tropospheric dry-air partial column–averaged mole fractions of ozone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M45" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>wet</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>wet</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>air</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the partial columns (in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecules</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of ozone, wet air, and water vapor, respectively, over the vertical range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the dry-air partial column-averaged mole fraction of ozone, which is equivalent to a column-weighted mean mixing ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated by dividing the ozone partial column by that of the dry air. This approach is adopted to facilitate direct comparison with ozonesonde profiles and model outputs. For simplicity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is hereafter referred to as the tropospheric ozone column-averaged mole fraction (TOC in ppb), over 0.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Noting that its unit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distinguishes it from the total column abundance expressed in Dobson Units <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DU</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The altitude range is consistent with previous FTIR studies defining TOC over 0–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx77" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1291"><bold>(a)</bold> Partial column averaging kernels (PC AVKs) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for different retrieval layers on 1 October 2022. The solid black line shows the total column AVK. Colored dashed lines indicate the PC AVKs corresponding to different degrees of freedom (DOFs): 0.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, red marked), 10.2–17.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, blue), 17.7–24.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, green), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, orange). Red markers highlight the PC AVK for the tropospheric ozone partial column (0.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is the focus of this study. <bold>(b)</bold> Sensitivity of the first layer PC AVK (0.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the measurement period varies with solar zenith angle (SZA). Each colored line corresponds to a retrieval at a specific SZA, with the color scale on the right. </p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1424">The uncertainty budget of our ozone retrievals includes different types of contributions as shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. For the total column, systematic uncertainties from spectroscopy and instrument modeling amount to about 5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while random noise contributes 1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the tropospheric column, the estimated uncertainties are of a different nature and therefore not directly additive. Day-to-day variability (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) reflects the representativeness of the retrievals.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1466">Summary of ozone column uncertainties, including total column relative errors and tropospheric partial column (0–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) absolute uncertainties. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Source</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Magnitude</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Total column uncertainty</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Systematic</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Spectroscopic, instrument model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Random</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Measurement noise</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col3">Tropospheric column uncertainty</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Day-to-day variability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Between-day standard deviations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (13.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SZA sensitivity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Max deviation with SZA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stratospheric ozone effect</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">tropospheric ozone column overestimation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1651">When interpreting the diurnal pattern from FTIR-derived TOC, two aspects require consideration. First, the FTIR-derived TOC is the integration over 0.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this inevitably dampens near-surface variability, assuming there is little variability of ozone in the free troposphere over Palau in a pristine oceanic region, like the TWP. This compromises the representation of boundary-layer changes in the integrated TOC. Second, besides this vertical smoothing, other sources of uncertainty also affect the retrieved TOC, such as solar zenith angle (SZA) dependence and residual stratospheric influence.</p>
      <p id="d2e1662">As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a, the PC AVK of the first layer is highly sensitive within the 0.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range, indicating high information content. This supports using the part of the retrieval corresponding to the tropospheric degree of freedom (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to represent the TOC. Moreover, the PC AVK is the highest below 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PC AVK <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and decreases with altitude (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a, red line). This indicates that TOC mainly reflects near-surface information. The same feature was observed for all PC AVK during the measurement period (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b). The maximum sensitivity always lies near the surface, where most of the diurnal variation occurs. From previous aircraft observations, no discernible diurnal ozone variations were found above 750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.30"/>. Thus, consistent with the PC AVK, the FTIR-derived tropospheric ozone column primarily captures near-surface ozone variability, although vertical integration over the column reduces the apparent diurnal amplitude. We estimate that the TOC retains only about 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the near-surface variability (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS3"/>).</p>
      <p id="d2e1731">From FTIR-derived TOC to interpret the diurnal cycle, the SZA dependency of the measurements should also be considered. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b, the sensitivity of the FTIR measurements varies with SZA. We estimate the resulting SZA-induced uncertainty of a maximum deviation of 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), see details of the quantifying method in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>. To validate the FTIR TOC diurnal cycle, we further compare the retrievals with model simulations and ozonesonde observations.</p>
      <p id="d2e1754">However, the PC AVK does not drop sharply above 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but gradually decays, reaching near-zero only around 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>). This indicates residual sensitivity above the defined TOC layer, which can lead to vertical smoothing–induced leakage of stratospheric ozone to the TOC. Given that ozone mixing ratios increase with altitude from the upper troposphere, this leakage results in an overestimation bias of approximately 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (6.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the retrieved TOC, see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2"/>. Together, these values characterize the expected range and type of uncertainty, but they do not compromise the detection of the observed diurnal pattern.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>GEOS-Chem Model Simulations</title>
      <p id="d2e1802"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations were simulated using the global 3-D chemical transport model GEOS-Chem (version 13.4.0, classic, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="author.31"/>, 2022; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="author.32"/>, 2001), with the full-chemistry module. The model was driven by meteorological fields from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2), provided by the NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO).</p>
      <p id="d2e1821">Emissions were handled using the Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.33"/>). Lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) emissions were taken from the GEOS-Chem standard configuration (HEMCO Lightning NOx v2014-07), based on cloud-top height parameterizations and described in the official GEOS-Chem HEMCO archive.</p>
      <p id="d2e1849">Moreover, we conducted two sensitivity simulations, one <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission is turning off and one <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is doubling, to show lightning effect on ozone formation and atmospheric oxidation. Simulations cover the period 2020–2022, using a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 72 vertical levels from the surface to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with time steps of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for transport and 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for chemistry. Model output was archived hourly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Intercomparison</title>
      <p id="d2e1923"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from FTIR measurements, ozonesonde profiles, and model simulations are compared in this study to evaluate the consistency between observations and model outputs. To ensure a fair comparison, we use model results from the full chemistry simulation and account for the vertical sensitivity of the FTIR retrievals by applying the retrieval AVK.</p>
      <p id="d2e1936">The retrieval sensitivity is described by the AVK matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the a priori profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, both of which affect how true atmospheric profiles are represented in the FTIR product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx64" id="paren.34"/>. To make the model or ozonesonde profiles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> comparable with the FTIR retrievals, they are first smoothed using the following equation:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M111" display="block"><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the smoothed profile that incorporates the FTIR sensitivity characteristics. To ensure consistency in the application of the AVK, all model and ozonesonde profiles were interpolated to the vertical grid of the FTIR retrieval. This step is essential, as the AVK matrix <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined on the FTIR retrieval levels, and applying it directly to profiles on different vertical coordinates would lead to incorrect smoothing. Linear interpolation was used in pressure space, as it preserves the structure of atmospheric layers and is commonly applied in intercomparison studies e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx63 bib1.bibx67" id="text.35"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e2036">After smoothing, the dry-air partial column-averaged mole fraction of ozone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is computed for both the FTIR retrievals and the model or ozonesonde profiles as mentioned in Sect.<xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/> Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). The partial column is defined from the surface up to 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to the first layer of the FTIR retrieval product, as described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>. This consistent vertical integration ensures that differences reflect physical and chemical discrepancies rather than vertical resolution mismatches.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Trajectory simulation</title>
      <p id="d2e2081">To investigate the large-scale transport influencing ozone variability over Palau, we performed air-parcel trajectory analyses using the Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model developed by NOAA's Air Resources Laboratory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70" id="paren.36"/>. The calculations were driven by meteorological fields from the Global Data Assimilation System <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.37"><named-content content-type="pre">GDAS;</named-content></xref>, which provides global coverage at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal resolution and 3-hourly temporal frequency. GDAS data are widely used in regional and long-range transport studies.</p>
      <p id="d2e2108">Backward trajectories were initialized at the location of the Palau Atmospheric Observatory for three starting altitudes: the surface, 5, and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These levels represent conditions within the marine boundary layer, the lower free troposphere, and the upper portion of the FTIR retrieval range, respectively. Each trajectory was traced 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward in time to identify the dominant pathways and potential source regions influencing the observed ozone during the FTIR campaign.</p>
      <p id="d2e2127">The resulting trajectory ensemble provides a dynamical context for interpreting the tropospheric ozone signal by indicating whether the sampled air masses originated from remote oceanic regions, convective outflow, or areas with continental influence. While GDAS does not fully resolve small-scale boundary-layer mixing, it reliably captures the larger-scale circulation patterns that dominate transport in the TWP, making it suitable for assessing the origin and history of air masses arriving at Palau.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1">
  <label>2.5.1</label><title>Ozonesonde Observations</title>
      <p id="d2e2146">To support and evaluate the FTIR ozone retrievals, we use in situ vertical ozone profiles from ozonesonde launches at the PAO. Routine ozonesonde observations at this site have been conducted since 2016, as part of a long-term monitoring effort to characterize tropospheric composition and transport in the TWP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.38"/>. These observations provide high-vertical-resolution measurements of ozone, pressure, temperature, and relative humidity from the surface to the lower stratosphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e2152">During our FTIR measurement period (in September and October 2022), three ozonesonde launches can be matched with the measurement time of FTIR within the same day. We identified the FTIR measurements closest in time to each launch and used these matched pairs in comparison. To ensure consistency with the FTIR retrieval characteristics, when we make intercomparison between the TOC from FTIR and ozonesonde measurements, the ozonesonde profiles were smoothed using the FTIR AVK following the Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) as previously described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS3"/>. For quantitative comparison, we calculated the dry-air partial column ozone from the surface to 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each smoothed sonde profile, using the dry-air number density derived from pressure and temperature. This provides column amounts in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molecules</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, consistent with the integration range and units used in the FTIR analysis. This allowed a direct assessment of the agreement between FTIR retrievals and in situ measurements in the troposphere under matched temporal and vertical sampling conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2184">In addition to the matched-pair intercomparison with AVK-smoothed sonde profiles, we also examined whether the FTIR captures a consistent diurnal pattern by including all ozonesonde launches from September to October during 2020–2022. In total, 12 sondes were launched on 12 different days during this period. They were released at varying times of day, providing a general overview of diurnal variability during these months. However, no launches were performed in the morning due to operational constraints. As a result, ozonesonde observations do not cover the morning period, which is instead captured by the FTIR measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e2187">Because the number of matched pairs is limited, no AVK smoothing was applied in this analysis. However, a key challenge arises from the different measurement characteristics: FTIR retrievals are influenced by the AVK and have different sensitivity across the retrieval layer, whereas ozonesondes provide in situ profiles with uniform sensitivity. To enable a qualitative comparison of diurnal variability, we therefore focused on relative rather than absolute values. Specifically, we calculated the normalized anomaly of each dataset as

                  <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M121" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the hourly measurements from FTIR retrievals or ozonesonde, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean over the altitude of the respective dataset. This normalization <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to estimate the relative deviation from the mean value of each measurement. It removes the offset in absolute magnitude between the two instruments and highlights their relative deviations from the mean, allowing a comparison of the diurnal pattern of ozone.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS2">
  <label>2.5.2</label><title>Ozone precursor</title>
      <p id="d2e2258">The tropospheric ozone column from satellite is from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument/Microwave Limb Sounder (OMI/MLS) product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.39"/>. The OMI/MLS product is the residual of the OMI total ozone column and the MLS stratospheric ozone column, available from October 2004–December 2024 in monthly means as gridded (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column was from the Quality Assurance for Essential Climate Variables (QA4ECV) project version 1.1 level 3 (L3) product from OMI (2004–2017), from GOME-2(A) (2007–2016), from SCIAMACHY (2002–2012), in monthly means as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.40"/>. The tropospheric formaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) column was also from the QA4ECV project version 1.0 Level 3 (L3) product based on OMI measurements available between October 2004 and December 2020, monthly means as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded available <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.41"/>. The total column of CO was derived from the IASI satellite, also from the QA4ECV project. We use the level 3 (L3) products, it is available from 2007 to present, with monthly means <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded available <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.42"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS3">
  <label>2.5.3</label><title>Cloud effective radius</title>
      <p id="d2e2365">We used daily gridded cloud effective radius data from the MODIS/Aqua Level-3 product (CLDPROP_D3_MODIS_Aqua; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="altparen.43"/>), which provides globally gridded cloud optical and cloud-top properties retrieved using a unified algorithm applicable to both MODIS and VIIRS sensors, ensuring continuity across instruments. The analysis focused on the cloud effective radius at a spatial resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the months of September and October 2022. The MODIS CLDPROP Level-3 dataset has been extensively validated and widely used to investigate large-scale cloud microphysical properties, aerosol–cloud interactions, and climate-related variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS4">
  <label>2.5.4</label><title>Lightning</title>
      <p id="d2e2400">Lightning data are from the ground-based World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN), providing a regional view of lightning activity during the Palau campaign period. The data were obtained from the publicly available WWLLN climatology archive (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80 bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.45"/>), which provides globally gridded lightning stroke densities based on very low frequency (VLF) detections from a network of ground-based stations. Only strokes detected by at least five stations are retained to ensure high location accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.46"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, and the overall performance of WWLLN has been evaluated against satellite-based observations, demonstrating reliable detection efficiency and spatial accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx66" id="paren.47"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. This monthly gridded product has been widely used to study large-scale lightning patterns <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Tropospheric Ozone Measurement by FTIR and Comparison with Ozonesondes</title>
      <p id="d2e2438">We present tropospheric ozone observations over Palau using FTIR spectroscopy. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/> shows the time series of daily mean TOC derived from FTIR measurements, compared with GEOS-Chem model simulations and ozonesonde observations. The FTIR observations reveal very low tropospheric ozone levels, with an overall daily mean of 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. GEOS-Chem simulations, smoothed with the same AVK, yield a mean of 22.85 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the campaign period. The ozonesonde-based TOC shows good agreement with the FTIR measurements, further validating the reliability of the retrievals. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>b, the differences between the model and FTIR observations generally vary within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the model captures the day-to-day variability reasonably well. Overall, the model underestimates the absolute concentrations.</p>

      <fig id="F2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2482"><bold>(a)</bold> Time series of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from FTIR measurements, smoothed GEOS-Chem simulations, and smoothed ozonesonde profiles. <bold>(b)</bold> Daily differences between GEOS-Chem and FTIR (model – FTIR). All values represent dry-air partial columns averaged from the surface to 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Ozonesonde and model profiles are interpolated to the FTIR grid and smoothed with the FTIR AVK before integrating 0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to TOC.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2535">Building upon the time series analysis presented above, we next focus on the daytime diurnal variability of tropospheric ozone derived from the high-temporal-resolution FTIR observations. Because of the continuous solar absorption measurements throughout the day, the FTIR provides hourly retrievals between 07:00 and 16:00 LT. These retrievals can be used to derive the diurnal pattern of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements, as described in  Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> summarizes the diurnal behaviour: panel a shows the FTIR-derived tropospheric ozone column (TOC) together with GEOS-Chem simulations, while panel b presents normalized ozonesonde ozone profiles at different hours for evaluating the FTIR-derived diurnal pattern.</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2556"><bold>(a)</bold> Diurnal variation of tropospheric column of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (TOC) from FTIR measurement and GEOS-Chem (smoothed with AVKs). Error bars denote <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability within each hourly bin. <bold>(b)</bold> Normalized diurnal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from FTIR TOC, GEOS-Chem, and ozonesonde volume mixing ratios from surface–2.5 and 2.5–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Normalized values are calculated relative to the mean of each dataset (see Sect <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1"/>). Absolute values of ozonesonde hourly mean are shown in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2617">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a shows the daytime diurnal cycle of tropospheric ozone from FTIR measurements compared with GEOS-Chem simulations. FTIR data show an increase in ozone in the early morning, peaking around noon, followed by a decline in the afternoon.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> also compares the FTIR diurnal cycle with the GEOS-Chem simulation, time matched to FTIR measurements and smoothed. Compared with observational data, the model shows a much flatter pattern. Simulations without applying AVK smoothing display an even flatter diurnal variation with ozone concentrations remaining nearly constant throughout the day (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>). Note that Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a shows TOC derived from model profiles after AVK smoothing. The weak midday enhancement of about 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mainly results from the AVK smoothing effect associated with changes in solar zenith angle during the day. This indicates that the model fails to capture both the midday peak and the amplitude of the observed variations simultaneously. It also overestimates ozone in the early morning and late afternoon. Consequently, the simulated ozone diurnal cycle appears muted compared to observations. While the model captures the characteristic diurnal variability of photochemical radicals, the resulting net ozone change is insufficient to drive a discernible amplitude in the column (see Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/> for details on radical concentrations). This discrepancy likely arises from the coarse horizontal resolution and parameterized boundary-layer dynamics, which cannot catch the localized mixing or production mechanisms in the TWP. In addition, simplified representations of diurnal emissions and photolysis may further damp small-scale variability, as suggested by the FTIR and ozonesonde diurnal pattern in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b.</p>
      <p id="d2e2643">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b compares normalized ozone variations from FTIR and ozonesonde measurements (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1"/>).  Because the FTIR retrievals have different sensitivity across altitude, the AVK must be considered when making such comparisons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67 bib1.bibx65" id="paren.49"/>. Given the limited number of time-matched observations, we used normalized hourly averages to remove absolute differences between datasets, see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS5.SSS1"/>. This approach enables a qualitative comparison of diurnal variability based on relative changes without applying smoothing to the ozone sounding profiles. Relative deviations from the mean were calculated for each dataset (Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), and the resulting normalized diurnal variation is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b. The absolute hourly mean plot of ozonesonde is shown in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S1"/>. The ozonesonde data also exhibit a midday enhancement, though less pronounced than in the FTIR measurements, followed by a discernible afternoon decline and a more dispersed distribution in both the near-surface layer (below 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the free troposphere (2.5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). These results highlight the inherent challenges in comparing FTIR and ozonesonde observations due to their different vertical sensitivities. Even without sufficient morning ozonesonde launches and without AVK smoothing of profiles, the normalized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from different datasets still provides indirect evidence for the pattern of midday peak and the afternoon decline. The error bars in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a indicate an hourly variability of approximately 2–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The daytime diurnal variation of tropospheric ozone measured by FTIR is on the order of 6–8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but this magnitude should be interpreted as a lower limit of near-surface ozone variability, as the FTIR retrieval represents a vertically integrated tropospheric column (0–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a reduced peak-to-peak amplitude.</p>
      <p id="d2e2728">This interpretation is supported by the ozonesonde observations in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>b, which show larger ozone variability near the surface than in the free troposphere, where photochemical production and dry deposition are weaker above approximately 750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (about 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.50"/>. Accounting for the solar zenith angle (SZA) effect, which leads to an overestimation of the apparent diurnal amplitude by about 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>), the FTIR-derived peak-to-peak variation is approximately 4–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Considering the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> damping of near-surface variability in the vertically integrated tropospheric ozone column (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS3"/>), this implies a near-surface diurnal ozone amplitude on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Low ozone and precursors in Palau</title>
      <p id="d2e2818">Palau is located in the TWP, a region characterized by persistently low tropospheric ozone concentrations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.51"/>. Observations show that daytime ozone levels typically remain between 10–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from July until October <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.52"/>, among the lowest values globally.  To examine the origin and transport pathway of air masses influencing Palau, we computed 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> backward trajectories using the HYSPLIT model. Most trajectories remain below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a), indicating that transport occurs within the free troposphere. Trajectories longer than 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> predominantly originate from the central Pacific, following easterly circulation across the Pacific, with trade winds dominating the lower troposphere and additional contributions from large-scale tropical circulation at higher altitudes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>b). This flow pattern is typical for the September–October period, which lies in the transition between the southwest monsoon and the establishment of the northeast trade wind regime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx73" id="paren.53"/>. During this period, the TWP is mainly influenced by persistent marine inflow from the east, resulting in minimal continental influence. Ozone lifetimes are on the order of 10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the free troposphere <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61" id="paren.54"/>, but considerably shorter in the marine boundary layer and increasing with altitude. (about 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx36" id="altparen.55"/>). Thus, these air parcels are expected to retain their low ozone concentrations upon arrival. In addition, backward trajectories show that during the 2–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> before arrival, air masses confined mostly below 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> originate in the western Pacific, reflecting additional regional marine contributions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>a and b). Together, these results suggest that both long-range and regional transport of ozone-poor air masses contribute to the persistently low tropospheric ozone observed over Palau.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2910"><bold>(a–b)</bold> Ten-day backward trajectories initiated from Palau, color-coded by <bold>(a)</bold> altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <bold>(b)</bold> backward time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(c–f)</bold> Satellite-derived tropospheric column of <bold>(c)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(d)</bold> CO, <bold>(e)</bold> HCHO, and <bold>(f)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The white cross marks the location of Palau. The arrow in panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> indicates the mean transport pathway during the study period based on trajectory simulations.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2996">Satellite retrievals support this interpretation. A broad ozone minimum is evident over the western Pacific warm pool (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c), coinciding with low column densities of major precursors: CO (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>d), HCHO (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>e), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>f). The scarcity of these precursors in both the lower and free troposphere points to a suppressed photochemical ozone production regime. The lack of precursors arises from weak local emissions and the continuous inflow of clean marine air from the eastern Pacific. In addition, the interhemispheric convective zone (ITCZ) over the TWP during the campaign coincided with strong precipitation bands <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.56"/>, which likely enhanced the washout of precursors. Enhanced humidity in the tropical troposphere promotes ozone loss via <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chemistry. At the same time, precipitation efficiently removes soluble species such as HCHO and nitrogen reservoir species produced from NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> oxidation (e.g. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HNO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), indirectly reducing NO<sub><italic>x</italic></sub> availability and suppressing ozone production. Trajectory analyses confirm that air masses reaching Palau predominantly follow oceanic pathways with minimal continental influence, as mentioned before. This is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.57"/>, who showed similar oceanic transport patterns in the 5–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer but predominant during September and October. These pathways align with regions of consistently low CO and ozone concentrations across the tropical Pacific (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>c and d). In contrast, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a short atmospheric lifetime and is not efficiently transported over long distances, such that its low abundance near Palau reflects weak local and regional <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>f). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HCHO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, while also short-lived, is primarily produced locally through VOC oxidation, and its low abundance therefore indicates weak photochemical activity under pristine marine conditions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>e), further limiting in situ ozone formation. The low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns also suggest minimal contributions from lightning or other episodic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sources, reinforcing the interpretation of limited photochemical ozone production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Microphysical suppression of lightning and ozone formation</title>
      <p id="d2e3138">In the maritime TWP, despite low lightning frequency, lightning-generated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remains an important free-tropospheric ozone source. We therefore investigate the microphysical conditions influencing lightning initiation, in addition to dynamical and chemical factors. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a shows the spatial distribution of lightning stroke density from WWLLN observations, confirming that lightning activity near Palau is lower than over the Maritime Continent or northern Australia. Although isolated lightning events do occur over the open ocean (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>a), they are sparse and less frequent, indicating that meteorological and microphysical environments in this region are inherently unfavorable for intense convective electrification. Observational evidence for marine convection without lightning has been reported in several studies, including <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.58"/> over the tropical Atlantic and the PEM-West campaign <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.59"/>, which found that such convection favors the washout of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derivatives.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e3176">Spatial distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> annual mean lightning stroke density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">yr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from WWLLN, <bold>(b)</bold> MODIS satellite derived cloud effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(c)</bold> dust aerosol optical extinction (AOT) at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from MERRA-2 reanalysis. The white cross marks the location of Palau.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3236">The MODIS-derived cloud effective radius is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>b. Over the warm pool region, cloud droplets are generally larger, which is typically associated with enhanced precipitation water content and reduced ice water content <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.60"/>. These conditions promote warm-rain processes and inhibit the development of ice particles, thereby weakening charge separation and suppressing lightning activity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.61"/>.  Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>c displays the dust aerosol optical thickness over the TWP, showing low dust loadings above Palau. In contrast to continental outflow regions, the central Pacific air column is nearly devoid of aerosol particles capable of serving as ice nuclei. This lack of ice nuclei suppresses the formation of ice-dominant or mixed-phase clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.62"/>, reducing the likelihood of charge separation and lightning initiation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.63"/>. Low aerosol concentrations favor the formation of larger cloud droplets, which reduces lightning activity and lowers <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. This, in turn, diminishes ozone levels in the upper free troposphere and illustrates the tight coupling between aerosol microphysics, cloud dynamics, and atmospheric chemistry. It provides an additional causal chain rooted in microphysical processes, through which precursor scarcity is further reinforced, complementing the direct explanations of weak anthropogenic influence and efficient washout (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS2"/>). In this view, the low precursor abundances over Palau arise not only from a dynamically clean marine environment but also from suppressed lightning NOx production linked to the paucity of ice nuclei and mixed-phase clouds.</p>
      <p id="d2e3270">While this interpretation is supported by the observed patterns, the spatial differences (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>) between dust aerosol, cloud effective radius, and lightning activity suggest that more complex microphysical processes may also be at play. This points to the possibility of additional factors influencing lightning production in marine convective systems, such as variations in updraft strength, cloud ice content, freezing level height, or the availability of giant cloud condensation nuclei for mixed-phase cloud <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.64"/>. Importantly, the overall meteorological linkage supports the view that photochemical background conditions in tropical marine regions are not only chemically pristine but also dynamically regulated by aerosol–cloud interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Influence of Lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on Regional Ozone</title>
      <p id="d2e3298">To quantify the role of lightning-produced nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in modulating tropospheric ozone over Palau, we performed two sensitivity simulations using the GEOS-Chem model by turning off and doubling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). As shown in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>, lightning activity is negligible in the TWP region. Therefore, substantial perturbations to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions, near-surface and free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios over the TWP exhibit little response (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/>c–i). In contrast, pronounced responses to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> perturbations are evident over lightning-active regions such as northern Australia and the Maritime Continent.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e3362">Differences in tropospheric column–averaged mole fractions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dry-air  between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitivity simulations and the base simulation. <bold>(a–c)</bold> the differences between the no-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulation and the base simulation (no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minus base), and <bold>(d–f)</bold> the differences between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulation and the base simulation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> minus base). Columns correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from left to right. The red triangle marks the location of the Palau FTIR measurement site. The absolute value of the simulation results are shown in Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S3"/>, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3510">The resulting ozone anomalies extend eastward into the TWP, indicating that the ozone response over Palau primarily reflects transport from nearby regions, such as northern Australia and the Maritime Continent rather than local photochemical production. As a result, removing or doubling <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/>b and c) leads to modest ozone changes over the TWP, with regional differences of approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>a and d).</p>
      <p id="d2e3547">Moreover, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions moderately enhance regional hydroxyl radical (OH) concentrations (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>b and e), reflecting their contribution to atmospheric oxidative capacity. In the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels decrease by approximately 0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Under clean air conditions such as the TWP, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly produced by ozone photolysis followed by the reaction of excited atomic oxygen with water vapor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.65"/>. Specifically, the dominant pathway is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ν</mml:mi><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.66"/>. While this pathway governs the primary production of  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, its regeneration depends strongly on the availability of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> through the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the absence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases, yet <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> recycling becomes inefficient <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.67"/>, leading to a less oxidizing atmosphere and reduced photochemical ozone production efficiency.</p>
      <p id="d2e3753">In remote tropical regions like Palau, where anthropogenic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are minimal and lightning activity is strongly suppressed, lightning represents one of the few potential sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our sensitivity simulations indicate that, under such conditions, the impact of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on local ozone is indirect and transport-driven rather than in situ. Although the overall influence on ozone is modest, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> plays a systematic role in regulating the regional oxidative capacity, consistent with previous assessments identifying lightning as a key natural <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> source in remote tropical atmospheres <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.68"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussions</title>
      <p id="d2e3824">Previous studies have demonstrated characteristic diurnal surface ozone cycles in both urban and remote mid-latitude regions, driven predominantly by photochemical processes. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx71" id="text.69"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.70"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.71"/> reported daytime increases in surface ozone over the US and China, highlighting the role of local photochemistry under sufficient solar radiation and precursor availability. Similarly, observations from a remote high-altitude site in the Tibetan Plateau revealed a midday ozone maximum, further supporting the dominance of daytime photochemical production even in pristine environments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.72"/>. Our measurements in TWP exhibit a comparable diurnal pattern in the tropospheric column, with ozone peaking around noon. Comparison with near-surface ozonesonde profiles further supports the presence of a midday enhancement. It should be emphasized, however, that the FTIR retrieval provides an integrated column signal (0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), rather than a direct measurement of the surface. If the free troposphere exhibits little or no diurnal variability, then the signal detected in the integrated column likely reflects a surface-driven cycle that appears in muted form when averaged over the full tropospheric depth. Still, the FTIR TOC measurements in Palau capture the diurnal pattern, although the peak-to-peak amplitude is underestimated. The higher AVK sensitivity in the lower troposphere (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>) ensures that surface-driven variability is retained in the column retrieval rather than being fully smoothed out. This highlights that similar analyses at other FTIR sites must carefully consider the altitude-dependent sensitivity of the retrieval (AVK), as it determines how surface-driven diurnal variability is sufficiently reflected in the integrated column.</p>
      <p id="d2e3850">The comparison between the GEOS-Chem model simulation and the observations in Palau shows an overall agreement in day-to-day variation, suggesting that the tropical region is reasonably well represented, consistent with findings from previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.73"/>. However, it does not well capture the ozone diurnal cycle and is biased lower than the observations. This underestimation is consistent with previous evaluations of GEOS-Chem, which have also reported a low bias relative to the observations. This underestimation aligns with prior evaluations of GEOS-Chem, which have similarly reported a low bias in tropospheric ozone in both the mid-latitudes – often linked to limitations in simulating stratosphere – troposphere exchange – and in tropical regions due to active convection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.74"/>. These results highlight the need for further improvements in the model performance over the remote western Pacific, where observational constraints remain limited.</p>
      <p id="d2e3859">The tropospheric ozone levels in Palau are the lowest, with a mean value of 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is consistent with findings from previous studies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="text.75"/>, using aircraft observations, reported extremely low ozone concentrations in the tropical tropopause layer (TTL). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.76"/> further showed that low ozone near the TTL observed by balloon-borne instruments originated from the TWP boundary layer, influenced by the Asian summer monsoon. Most recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.77"/> demonstrated that ozone-poor, humid air masses over the TWP are primarily of local or convective origin and occur year-round, with peak prevalence from August to October. These consistent findings from diverse platforms support our measurement results, confirming that the Western Pacific region is characterized by the lowest tropospheric ozone concentrations globally.</p>
      <p id="d2e3879">The observed ozone minimum over Palau can be attributed to several factors. First, as shown in our analysis, the region exhibits low concentrations of ozone precursors, limiting in situ ozone production. Second, persistent deep convection in the TWP efficiently transports ozone-poor boundary layer air into the upper troposphere, leading to low ozone mixing ratios in convective outflow regions and contributing to a well-ventilated and vertically mixed tropospheric column. Additionally, we propose a potential aerosol–cloud interaction mechanism that suppresses lightning activity, which could produce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As a result, ozone production in the upper troposphere is not compensated by lightning-generated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is the only relevant source of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this region. This mechanism is supported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.78"/>, who reported co-located low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and low ozone concentrations based on in situ aircraft observations close to the north of Australia.</p>
      <p id="d2e3927">Our control simulation further suggests that such meteorological and microphysical conditions may also lead to reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels, lowering the oxidative capacity of the atmosphere, even at higher altitudes. Although direct observations of aerosol–cloud interactions and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations are limited, this mechanism may contribute to a persistently low-ozone environment and potentially influence the composition of air entering the stratosphere. This is particularly important given that the TWP is a key pathway for troposphere-to-stratosphere transport <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.79"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e3958">Our FTIR measurements over Palau provide new evidence of a clear diurnal cycle of tropospheric ozone in the Pacific warm pool region, with concentrations increasing from early morning to a midday peak and further afternoon decline. This cycle is most likely surface-driven, reflecting local photochemical production and boundary layer mixing, and appears in the column retrieval rather than as a free-tropospheric signal. Relative comparisons with ozonesonde profiles corroborate the midday maximum and the afternoon decline pattern. In contrast, GEOS-Chem captures day-tp-day variability but underestimates absolute concentrations and fails to reproduce the observed diurnal cycle both near the surface and in the tropospheric column.</p>
      <p id="d2e3961">Throughout the measurement period, Palau consistently exhibited some of the lowest tropospheric ozone concentrations observed in the tropics, with a mean value of 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between surface and 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This persistent low ozone is driven by a combination of factors: limited local precursor emissions, large-scale easterly advection of clean marine air, and deep convection that efficiently transports ozone-poor air from the boundary layer to the free troposphere.</p>
      <p id="d2e3980">In the upper troposphere, additional constraints arise from suppressed lightning activity, as indicated by low lightning flash rates and large cloud droplet sizes retrieved from satellite observations. These microphysical conditions are likely associated with low aerosol loading, which limits convective electrification and hence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production. Sensitivity experiments by GEOS-Chem confirm that removing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reduces the atmospheric oxidizing capacity, while enhancing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leads to a corresponding increase. These simulation results show that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is one contributing factor for the sustained low oxidative environment in TTL over the TWP region.</p>
      <p id="d2e4027">Taken together, these findings suggest that the TWP is characterized not only by dynamically driven ozone minima but also by chemically suppressed oxidation environments. The coexistence of low ozone and low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> implies that air in this region may ascend into the stratosphere before the chemical removal. Given the Pacific warm pool region's role as a global stratospheric entrance, such measurements are essential for understanding the coupled chemical and dynamical processes governing this region. Improved representation of these mechanisms in models is critical for quantifying the influence of tropospheric inputs on stratospheric composition, radiative forcing, and processes relevant to climate.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <label>Appendix A</label><title>Statistical support for the FTIR and ozonesonde diurnal ozone comparison</title>
      <p id="d2e4049">This Appendix provides statistical context for the comparison of diurnal ozone variations derived from FTIR and ozonesonde observations. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FA1"/> and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/> summarize the hourly mean values, associated variability, and sampling statistics used in the analysis.</p>

      <fig id="FA1"><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d2e4058">Diurnal variation of tropospheric ozone over Palau derived from FTIR measurements, GEOS-Chem simulations, and ozonesonde observations. Blue circles show FTIR-derived tropospheric ozone (0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), orange circles denote GEOS-Chem results smoothed with the FTIR AVK over the same altitude range, and green squares indicate AVK-smoothed ozonesonde tropospheric ozone (0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Orange squares represent ozonesonde volume mixing ratios averaged over the near-surface layer (surface–750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Error bars denote <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability. All values are shown as a function of local time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>UTC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<table-wrap id="TA1"><label>Table A1</label><caption><p id="d2e4118">Hourly-binned statistics of FTIR measurements for tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Palau.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Local hour</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Std <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">18.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20.94</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">28</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">22.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.58</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">27.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.99</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">31</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">25.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.62</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23.77</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">23.79</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">19.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e4390">For the FTIR observations, diurnal ozone statistics were constructed by grouping all valid retrievals during September–October 2022 into hourly bins in local time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>UTC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For each bin, the mean tropospheric ozone (0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the corresponding standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were calculated. The standard deviation reflects a combination of instrumental retrieval uncertainty and day-to-day atmospheric variability within each hour. As shown in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="TA1"/>, most hourly bins contain more than 20 individual FTIR measurements, spanning multiple independent days (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for most daytime hours).</p>
      <p id="d2e4442">Ozonesonde observations are more sparsely distributed in time and do not cover all local hours. To ensure comparability, ozonesonde profiles were smoothed using the FTIR AVKs prior to integration over 0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, near-surface ozonesonde ozone (surface–750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is shown separately to illustrate the stronger amplitude of boundary-layer variability. Error bars for ozonesonde data represent the standard deviation within each hourly bin and mainly reflect natural variability and limited sample size rather than instrumental uncertainty.</p>
      <p id="d2e4461">Despite differences in sampling frequency and vertical sensitivity, the FTIR and ozonesonde observations show consistent diurnal variation pattern during the overlapping hours. The observed diurnal variation in FTIR-derived tropospheric ozone exceeds the typical retrieval uncertainty and remains robust when considering the reported <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability. Taken together, the number of observations, multi-day sampling, and explicit treatment of uncertainties support the statistical significance of the diurnal ozone features discussed in the main text.</p>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <label>Appendix B</label><title>Uncertainty estimation</title>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>B1</label><title>SZA influence</title>
      <p id="d2e4492">To assess the potential impact of solar zenith angle (SZA) on the retrieved tropospheric ozone partial column, we examined the partial column averaging kernel (PC AVK) as a function of SZA. PC AVK quantifies the sensitivity of the retrieved partial column to the true ozone profile at each altitude and varies systematically with SZA (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b).</p>
      <p id="d2e4497">To quantify the potential retrieval bias associated with variations in the AVK under different SZA conditions, we performed an upper-limit error estimation. Specifically, we calculated the layerwise maximum differences in the PC AVK across all SZA conditions:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M262" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S2.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>B1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">min⁡</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4570">These values represent the maximum possible sensitivity variation for each layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to SZA-dependent retrieval characteristics. We then propagated this AVK perturbation into partial column uncertainty using the a priori ozone VMR profile <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VMR</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the dry-air column density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in each layer from surface to 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula id="App1.Ch1.S2.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>B2</label><mml:math id="M267" display="block"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>PC AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VMR</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e4671">The resulting upper-limit impact on the 0.2–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric ozone partial column is estimated to be no more than 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to approximately 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the typical retrieved partial column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over Palau during the study period. This value should be interpreted as a conservative upper-bound estimate, as it is based on the largest AVK variation observed across all SZA conditions. In reality, the actual PC AVK perturbation within a single day is expected to be smaller than the constructed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>PC AVK</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, since the co-occurrence of maximum SZA-induced changes in all layers is physically unrealistic, see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>b. In all cases, the impact of AVK variability (1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the near-surface layer is smaller relative to the diurnal variation magnitude of approximately 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e4756">Additionally, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/> shows the hourly mean ozone concentrations from GEOS-Chem for September–October 2022. The model exhibits no discernible diurnal variation from the surface to the upper troposphere (model levels 992.5–356.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FB1"/>, there is a strong relative diurnal variability for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over Palau. However, the absolute concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remain extremely low (peak <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppt</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Under such pristine, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited conditions, the absolute photochemical turnover (the net rate of ozone production and loss) is very small. Therefore, even significant relative fluctuations in radical abundance do not translate into a pronounced diurnal cycle in the total ozone column. The inability of the model to capture the observed afternoon ozone peak suggests that localized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production or vertical transport processes may be smoothed out by grid resolution of the model.  For a consistent comparison with the FTIR observations, the model profiles were smoothed using the FTIR AVK. Nevertheless, even after AVK smoothing the modeled ozone diurnal cycle remains much weaker than observed (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>a). This demonstrates that the inability of GEOS-Chem to reproduce the observed diurnal ozone cycle cannot be attributed to AVK smoothing or retrieval artifacts, but instead reflects insufficient diurnal variability in the modeled chemical and dynamical processes.</p>

      <fig id="FB1"><label>Figure B1</label><caption><p id="d2e4871">Hourly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from GEOS-Chem simulations for September–October 2022, shown at individual model levels (992.5–356.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>


</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>B2</label><title>Stratosphere effect in the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column</title>
      <p id="d2e4948">To evaluate potential overestimation of tropospheric ozone due to the vertical sensitivity of the retrieval, we analyzed the impact of AVK tails above the target range (0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>a. Unlike trace gases such as CO or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whose concentrations decrease with altitude, ozone concentrations increase rapidly near the tropopause and into the lower stratosphere. As a result, even moderate AVK values above 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 0.0 between 10–20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can lead to a measurable contribution to the retrieved partial column.</p>
      <p id="d2e5000">To estimate this “leakage” effect from upper level especially for stratospheric ozone, we applied the AVK vector for the first degree of freedom (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>DOF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to the a priori ozone profile and computed the portion of the column originating from altitudes above 10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M300" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>VMR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>leak</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>dry air</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>dry air</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mtext>km</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VMR</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ap</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S2.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>B3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry air</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>dry air</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the dry air partial column in each layer, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mtext>PC</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>dry air</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total dry air column within the retrieval's first partial column layer (0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This provides an equivalent ozone mixing ratio resulting from high-altitude leakage. The estimated leakage error is approximately 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the typical tropospheric ozone column (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) during the measurement period. So we use this value to assign a 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty for the stratosphere effect, suggesting that a small fraction of stratospheric ozone is aliased into the tropospheric partial column. Rather than undermining the retrieval, this reinforces our conclusion that ozone over Palau is exceptionally low – possibly even lower than the retrieved values. Comparisons with coincident radiosonde observations support this finding and confirm that the leakage remains within the expected uncertainty range.</p>
      <p id="d2e5212">This method offers a simplified estimate of vertical smoothing error, consistent with the principle introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.80"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="text.81"/>. This estimation method follows the principles of these two methodologies and evaluates the impact of the average nuclear tail on the inversion value by applying AVK to the reference profile. Although we use a prior profile rather than the actual state, this method can still provide a preliminary estimate of the vertical smoothing effect (i.e. upper layer leakage AVK), which is important for partial column inversion, especially for species like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with higher VMR at higher altitudes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="App1.Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>B3</label><title>Estimation of near-surface contribution to tropospheric column ozone</title>
      <p id="d2e5240">The TOC retrieved from FTIR represents the vertically averaged dry-air column mole fractions response to the surface ozone variability. When most of the diurnal variability is confined to the near-surface layer and the free troposphere remains relatively constant, the integration and averaging dampen the observed signal. To quantify this damping, we define a ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the peak-to-peak amplitude of the TOC and that of the near-surface layer, using the partial PC AVK of the FTIR retrievals:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M311" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S2.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>B4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>avk</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S2.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>B5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d2e5455">Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the fraction of near-surface variability that is visible in the TOC. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>AVK</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the FTIR partial column averaging kernel corresponding to the retrieved tropospheric column (0–10.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a linear decay shape function for the diurnal amplitude, which is derived from the near-surface ozone gradients reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.82"/>, assuming a linear decrease from the surface to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see details below). The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the mean amplitude within the near-surface layer of thickness, where discernible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability is observed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="paren.83"/>. In this study, we set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding approximately to 750 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Palau based on ozonesonde profiles. Applying this method to all available FTIR PC AVKs yields a median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.4, indicating that the TOC captures about 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the near-surface diurnal ozone variability. This factor quantifies the damping introduced by column integration and the retrieval sensitivity.</p>
      <p id="d2e5618">The above estimate is based on an idealized vertical shape function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that linearly decreases from the surface to zero at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>BL</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To assess the robustness of this approach, we tested alternative profiles, including exponential decays with scale heights of 0.6–1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and stepwise reductions following the boundary layer evolution reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.84"/>. Across these scenarios, the resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values varied within 0.35–0.45, consistent with the median value of 0.4 reported above.</p>
      <p id="d2e5679">In addition, we considered the dependence of the PC AVK on SZA. The overestimation of the ozone diurnal cycle by the SZA effect of 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Appendix <xref ref-type="sec" rid="App1.Ch1.S2.SS1"/>), the 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> peak-to-peak diurnal amplitude during the campaign (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>) can be estimated to 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Then, we estimated that the peak-to-peak diurnal magnitude of the near-surface ozone is about 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, the conclusion that the FTIR tropospheric ozone column captures approximately 40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the near-surface diurnal variability is robust against reasonable assumptions about the vertical amplitude shape and SZA-dependent retrieval sensitivity of approximately 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S3">
  <label>Appendix C</label><title>Sensitivity test results</title>
      <p id="d2e5746">Sensitivity studies have been conducted for the Lightning emission over the TWP region. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/> shows the Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> simulated by GEOS-Chem and averaged over the study period. The difference between the sensitivity study and the base simulation is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>. Note that the color bar scale is larger than the variation in NO; the difference between Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="FC1"/> is not visible, especially at very low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values over the TWP region.</p><fig id="FC1"><label>Figure C1</label><caption><p id="d2e5793">Tropospheric ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), hydroxyl radical (OH), and nitric oxide (NO) columns simulated by GEOS-Chem and averaged over the study period. <bold>(a–c)</bold> The base simulation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions included. <bold>(d–f)</bold> The sensitivity simulation with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions turned off (no <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <bold>(g–i)</bold> the simulation with doubled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LNO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Columns correspond to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from left to right. The red triangle marks the location of the Palau FTIR measurement site.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4841/2026/acp-26-4841-2026-f09.png"/>
        

      </fig>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e5921">The FTIR tropospheric ozone dataset used in this study is available at Zenodo (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17456752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17456752</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx72" id="altparen.85"/>). The SFIT4 code for ozone retrieval is available at <uri>https://github.com/NCAR/sfit-core-code</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.86"/>. The GEOS-Chem model is publicly available at <uri>https://geoschem.github.io/</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="paren.87"/>. The meteorology data for the HYSPLIT run are available at <uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov/data/archives/gdas1/</uri> (last access: 10 June 2025). The HYSPLIT model code used in this analysis is publicly available at <uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri> (last access: 10 June 2025). The OMI/MLS products for tropospheric ozone column are publicly available at <uri>https://acd-ext.gsfc.nasa.gov/Data_services/cloud_slice/new_data.html</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.88"/>. The satellite products for tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are publicly available at <uri>http://www.temis.nl/qa4ecv/no2.html</uri> (last access: 16 September 2025) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.89"/>. The satellite products for tropospheric HCHO are publicly available at <uri>https://www.temis.nl/qa4ecv/hcho.html</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.90"/>. The satellite products for total column CO are publicly available at <uri>https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/co/</uri>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.91"/>. The MODIS/Aqua satellite product for cloud effective radius is publicly available at <uri>https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/products/CLDPROP_D3_MODIS_Aqua</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.92"/>. Lightning data are from the publicly available WWLLN climatology archive: <uri>https://www.wwlln.net/climate/</uri> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.93"/>. The ozonesonde data set is available under <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19383947" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19383947</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.94"/> and is included in the SHADOZ database and public available under <uri>https://tropo.gsfc.nasa.gov/shadoz/Palau.html</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026) (the data in the SHADOZ archive has been processed differently from raw sonde data than the dataset used in this paper) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.95"/>, 4 April 2026, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.96"/>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e6021">XS led the conceptualization, writing, and visualization of the manuscript. MP and XS supervised and led the FTIR measurements and ozone retrievals in Palau. DJ performed the trajectory model simulations and provided valuable assistance in refining the theoretical aspects and data analysis. JN contributed to the conceptual design and supervised the FTIR observations. KM provided ozone sounding data and coordinated, supervised, and led the Palau Atmospheric Observation Station (PAO). SP provided technical support for the instrument. All authors contributed to the writing and review of the article.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e6028">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e6034">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e6040">The authors want to thank Patrick Tellei, President of the Palau Community College, for the provision of space for the laboratory containers in the college; German Honorary Consul Thomas Schubert, for overall support; and various people and institutions for operations at the PAO: Jürgen “Egon” Graeser (AWI, Potsdam), Ingo Beninga (Impres GmbH), Wilfried Ruhe (Impres GmbH), Winfried Markert (Uni Bremen). The authors thank the IASI team, and IASI is a joint mission of EUMETSAT and the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES, France). The authors acknowledge the AERIS data infrastructure for providing access to the IASI data in this study, ULB-LATMOS for the development of the retrieval algorithms, and Eumetsat SAF for CO data production. The authors thank the WWLLN <uri>http://www.wwlln.net</uri> (last access: 15 September 2025), a collaboration among over 50 universities and institutions, for providing the lightning data used in this paper.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e6048">This work has been supported by the Central Research Development Fund (CRDF) of the University of Bremen, ZF 04 (No. 0100295604). BMFTR (Bundesministerium für Forschung, Technologie und Raumfahrt; Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space) in the project ROMIC-II subproject TroStra (01LG1904A).  The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the University of Bremen.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e6057">This paper was edited by Gabriele Stiller and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ainsworth(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Ainsworth, E. A.: Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution, Plant J., 90, 886–897, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13298" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/tpj.13298</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Amador and Arce-Fernández(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Amador, J. A. and Arce-Fernández, D.: WWLLN hot and cold-spots of lightning activity and their relation to climate in an extended central America region (2012–2020), Atmosphere-Basel, 13, 76, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos13010076</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Anderson et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, D. C., Pickering, K. E., Huey, L. G., Bradshaw, J. D., Crawford, J. H., Blake, D. R., Atlas, E. L., Ravetta, A. R., Avery, M. A., Campos, T. L., Weinheimer, A. J., Sachse, G. W., Sandholm, S. T., Sachse, G. W., Talbot, R. W., Wennberg, P. O., Crawford, J. H., Wennberg, P. O., and Prather, M. J.: A pervasive role for biomass burning in tropical high ozone/low water structures, Nat. Commun., 7, 10267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms10267</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bernier et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Bernier, C., Wang, Y., Estes, M., Lei, R., Jia, B., Wang, S., and Sun, J.: Clustering surface ozone diurnal cycles to understand the impact of circulation patterns in Houston, TX, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13457–13474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031725" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031725</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bey et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000807</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Boersma et al.(2017a)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., Van Geffen, J., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, T.: QA4ECV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric and stratospheric vertical column data from GOME-2A (Version 1.1), KNMI [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-gome2a-v1.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-gome2a-v1.1</ext-link>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Boersma et al.(2017b)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., Van Geffen, J., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, T.: QA4ECV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric and stratospheric vertical column data from SCIAMACHY (Version 1.1), KNMI [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-scia-v1.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-scia-v1.1</ext-link>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Boersma et al.(2017c)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., Van Geffen, J., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, T.: QA4ECV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric and stratospheric vertical column data from OMI (Version 1.1), KNMI [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-omi-v1.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-omi-v1.1</ext-link>, 2017c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Boersma et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Zara, M., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Maasakkers, J. D., van der A, R. J., Nightingale, J., De Rudder, A., Irie, H., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., and Compernolle, S. C.: Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6651–6678, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Braga et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Braga, R. C., Rosenfeld, D., Krüger, O. O., Ervens, B., Holanda, B. A., Wendisch, M., Krisna, T., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Voigt, C., and Pöhlker, M. L.: Linear relationship between effective radius and precipitation water content near the top of convective clouds: measurement results from ACRIDICON–CHUVA campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14079–14088, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14079-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14079-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Caram et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Caram, C., Szopa, S., Cozic, A., Bekki, S., Cuevas, C. A., and Saiz-Lopez, A.: Sensitivity of tropospheric ozone to halogen chemistry in the chemistry–climate model LMDZ-INCA vNMHC, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4041–4062, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4041-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-16-4041-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Cecil et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Cecil, D. J., Buechler, D. E., and Blakeslee, R. J.: Gridded lightning climatology from TRMM-LIS and OTD: dataset description, Atmos. Res., 135–136, 404–414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Chen et al.(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Meng, X., Yu, Y., Ginoux, P., DeMott, P. J., Xu, R., Zhai, L., Yan, Y., Zhao, C., Li, S.-M., Zhu, T., and Hu, M.: Decreased dust particles amplify the cloud cooling effect by regulating cloud ice formation over the Tibetan Plateau, Science Advances, 10, eado0885, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado0885" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.ado0885</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chen et al.(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>Chen, Z., Liu, R., Wu, S., Xu, J., Wu, Y., and Qi, S.: Diurnal variation characteristics and meteorological causes of autumn ozone in the Pearl River Delta, China, Sci. Total Environ., 908, 168469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168469" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168469</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Christian et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Christian, H. J., Blakeslee, R. J., Boccippio, D. J., Boeck, W. L., Buechler, D. E., Driscoll, K. T., Goodman, S. J., Hall, J. M., Koshak, W. J., Mach, D. M., and Stewart, M. F.: Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, ACL 4-1–ACL 4-15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002347" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002347</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Christiansen et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Christiansen, A., Mickley, L. J., Liu, J., Oman, L. D., and Hu, L.: Multidecadal increases in global tropospheric ozone derived from ozonesonde and surface site observations: can models reproduce ozone trends?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14751–14782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14751-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-14751-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Crawford et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Crawford, J. H., Davis, D. D., Chen, G., Bradshaw, J., Sandholm, S., Kondo, Y., Merrill, J., Liu, S., Browell, E., Gregory, G., Anderson, B., Sachse, G., Barrick, J., Blake, D., Talbot, R., and Pueschel, R.: Implications of large scale shifts in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> levels in the remote tropical Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 28447–28468, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00011</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>De Smedt et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>De Smedt, I., Yu, H., Richter, A., Beirle, S., Eskes, H., Boersma, K. F., Van Roozendael, M., Van Geffen, J., Wagner, T., Lorente, A., and Peters, E.: QA4ECV HCHO tropospheric column data from OMI, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18758/71021031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18758/71021031</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>De Smedt et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>De Smedt, I., Theys, N., Yu, H., Danckaert, T., Lerot, C., Compernolle, S., Van Roozendael, M., Richter, A., Hilboll, A., Peters, E., Pedergnana, M., Loyola, D., Beirle, S., Wagner, T., Eskes, H., van Geffen, J., Boersma, K. F., and Veefkind, P.: Algorithm theoretical baseline for formaldehyde retrievals from S5P TROPOMI and from the QA4ECV project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2395–2426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2395-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-2395-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Fueglistaler et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Fueglistaler, S. A., Dessler, A. E., Dunkerton, T. J., Folkins, I., Fu, Q., and Mote, P. W.: Tropical tropopause layer, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG1004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000267" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008RG000267</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Gao et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Gao, R., Rosenlof, K. H., Fahey, D. W., Wennberg, P. O., Hintsa, E. J., and Hanisco, T. F.: OH in the tropical upper troposphere and its relationships to solar radiation and reactive nitrogen, J. Atmos. Chem., 71, 55–64, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-014-9280-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-014-9280-2</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Gordon et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Gordon, I., Rothman, L., Hargreaves, R., Hashemi, R., Karlovets, E., Skinner, F., Conway, E., Hill, C., Kochanov, R., Tan, Y., Wcisło, P., Finenko, A., Nelson, K., Bernath, P., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K., Coustenis, A., Drouin, B., Flaud, J., Gamache, R., Hodges, J., Jacquemart, D., Mlawer, E., Nikitin, A., Perevalov, V., Rotger, M., Tennyson, J., Toon, G., Tran, H., Tyuterev, V., Adkins, E., Baker, A., Barbe, A., Canè, E., Császár, A., Dudaryonok, A., Egorov, O., Fleisher, A., Fleurbaey, H., Foltynowicz, A., Furtenbacher, T., Harrison, J., Hartmann, J., Horneman, V., Huang, X., Karman, T., Karns, J., Kassi, S., Kleiner, I., Kofman, V., Kwabia–Tchana, F., Lavrentieva, N., Lee, T., Long, D., Lukashevskaya, A., Lyulin, O., Makhnev, V., Matt, W., Massie, S., Melosso, M., Mikhailenko, S., Mondelain, D., Müller, H., Naumenko, O., Perrin, A., Polyansky, O., Raddaoui, E., Raston, P., Reed, Z., Rey, M., Richard, C., Tóbiás, R., Sadiek, I., Schwenke, D., Starikova, E., Sung, K., Tamassia, F., Tashkun, S., Vander Auwera, J., Vasilenko, I., Vigasin, A., Villanueva, G., Vispoel, B., Wagner, G., Yachmenev, A., and Yurchenko, S.: The HITRAN2020 molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 277, 107949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Han et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Han, Y., Luo, H., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., and Dong, W.: Cloud ice fraction governs lightning rate at a global scale, Communications Earth and Environment, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00233-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s43247-021-00233-4</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>He et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>He, G., He, C., Wang, H., Lu, X., Pei, C., Qiu, X., Liu, C., Wang, Y., Liu, N., Zhang, J., Lei, L., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Deng, T., Fan, Q., and Fan, S.: Nighttime ozone in the lower boundary layer: insights from 3-year tower-based measurements in South China and regional air quality modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13107–13124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13107-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-13107-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Holton and Gettelman(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Holton, J. R. and Gettelman, A.: Horizontal transport and the dehydration of the stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 951–954, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000GL012061</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Hu, L., Jacob, D. J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Kim, P. S., Sulprizio, M. P., and Yantosca, R. M.: Global budget of tropospheric ozone: evaluating recent model advances with satellite (OMI), aircraft (IAGOS), and ozonesonde observations, Atmos. Environ., 167, 323–334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.036</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Huang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Huang, S., Yang, J., Li, J., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., and Guo, F.: Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1831–1850, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Hutchins et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Hutchins, M. L., Holzworth, R. H., Brundell, J. B., and Rodger, C. J.: Relative detection efficiency of the World Wide Lightning Location Network, Radio Sci., 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RS005049" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012RS005049</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Ji et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Ji, D., Ritter, C., Sun, X., Moser, M., Voigt, C., Palm, M., and Notholt, J.: Giant Cloud Condensation Nuclei enhanced Ice Sublimation Process: a potential mechanism in mixed-phase clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13037–13052, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13037-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-13037-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kanamitsu(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M.: Description of the NMC global data assimilation and forecast system, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Kaplan and Lau(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Kaplan, J. O. and Lau, K. H.-K.: The WGLC global gridded lightning climatology and time series, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3219–3237, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3219-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-13-3219-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Kaplan and Lau(2022)</label><mixed-citation>Kaplan, J. O. and Lau, K. H.-K.: World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) Global Lightning Climatology (WGLC) and time series, 2022 update, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5665–5670, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5665-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-14-5665-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Keller et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Keller, C. A., Long, M. S., Yantosca, R. M., Da Silva, A. M., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.: HEMCO v1.0: a versatile, ESMF-compliant component for calculating emissions in atmospheric models, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1409–1417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>King et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>King, M. D., Platnick, S., Menzel, W. P., Ackerman, S. A., and Hubanks, P. A.: Spatial and temporal distribution of clouds observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 3826–3852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Kley et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Kley, D., Crutzen, P. J., Smit, H. G. J., Vömel, H., Oltmans, S. J., Grassl, H., and Ramanathan, V.: Observations of near-zero ozone concentrations over the convective Pacific: effects on air chemistry, Science, 274, 230–233, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5285.230" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.274.5285.230</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Kley et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Kley, D., Smit, H. G. J., Vömel, H., Grassl, H., Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Williams, S., Meywerk, J., and Oltmans, S. J.: Tropospheric water-vapour and ozone cross-sections in a zonal plane over the central equatorial Pacific Ocean, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 2009–2040, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354312" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49712354312</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>LATMOS(2013)</label><mixed-citation>LATMOS: Monthly IASI/Metop-B ULB-LATMOS carbon monoxide (CO) Climate Data Record (CDR) L3 products (total column gridded data), <uri>https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/</uri> (last access: 15 September 2025) (generated with FORLI v20151001 from EUMETSAT IASI Level 2 CO CDR Release 1. See also: Clerbaux et al., J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 113, 1391–1408, 2012), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Levy(1971)</label><mixed-citation>Levy, H.: Normal atmosphere: large radical and formaldehyde concentrations predicted, Science, 173, 141–143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3992.141" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.173.3992.141</ext-link>, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Li et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.: Dehydration and low ozone in the tropopause layer over the Asian monsoon caused by tropical cyclones: Lagrangian transport calculations using ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4133–4152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Lin et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, H., Jacob, D. J., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., Keller, C. A., Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Emmons, L. K., Campbell, P. C., Baker, B., Saylor, R. D., and Montuoro, R.: Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Liu et al.(1983)</label><mixed-citation>Liu, S. C., McFarland, M., Lasslo, J., Heikes, B. G., and McConnell, J. C.: Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> budgets in the Equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 88, 1360–1368, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC02p01360" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC088iC02p01360</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Mills et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Mills, G., Sharps, K., Simpson, D., Pleijel, H., Broberg, M., Uddling, J., Harmens, H., Hayes, F., Danielsson, H., Gerosa, G., Harmens, H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 6, 47, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.302</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Monks(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Monks, P. S.: A review of the observations and origins of the spring ozone maximum, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3545–3561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00129-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00129-1</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Müller et al.(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>Müller, K., Tradowsky, J. S., von der Gathen, P., Ritter, C., Patris, S., Notholt, J., and Rex, M.: Measurement report: The Palau Atmospheric Observatory and its ozonesonde record – continuous monitoring of tropospheric composition and dynamics in the tropical western Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2169–2193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2169-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-2169-2024</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Müller et al.(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>Müller, K., von der Gathen, P., and Rex, M.: Air mass transport to the tropical western Pacific troposphere inferred from ozone and relative humidity balloon observations above Palau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4693–4716, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4693-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-4693-2024</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Müller et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Müller, K., Graeser, J., Patris, S., Beninga, I., Ruhe, W., Ucharm, G., Tradowsky, J., Rüther, L., and Röpke, T.: Ozone sonde and radio sonde data record Palau Atmospheric Observatory 2016–2024 [Data set], Zenodo [datea set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19383947" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.19383947</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Myhre et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</ext-link>, 659–740, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Navarro et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Navarro, E. A., Portí, J. A., Salinas, A., Toledo-Redondo, S., Segura-García, J., Castilla, A., Montagud-Camps, V., and Albert, I.: The World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) over Spain, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3925–3943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3925-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-24-3925-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>NCAR(2025)</label><mixed-citation>NCAR – National Center for Atmospheric Research: SFIT4 Retrieval Code, <uri>https://github.com/NCAR/sfit-core-code</uri> (last access: 22 June 2025), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Newton et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Newton, R., Vaughan, G., Hintsa, E., Filus, M. T., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S., Atlas, E., Andrews, S. J., and Carpenter, L. J.: Observations of ozone-poor air in the tropical tropopause layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5157–5171, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5157-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5157-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Nussbaumer et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Nussbaumer, C. M., Tadic, I., Dienhart, D., Wang, N., Edtbauer, A., Ernle, L., Williams, J., Obersteiner, F., Gutiérrez-Álvarez, I., Harder, H., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Measurement report: In situ observations of deep convection without lightning during the tropical cyclone Florence 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7933–7945, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7933-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-7933-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Nussbaumer et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Nussbaumer, C. M., Kohl, M., Pozzer, A., Tadic, I., Rohloff, R., Marno, D., Harder, H., Ziereis, H., Zahn, A., Obersteiner, F., Hofzumahaus, A., Fuchs, H., Künstler, C., Brune, W. H., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Thompson, C. R., Bourgeois, I., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Ozone formation sensitivity to precursors and lightning in the tropical troposphere based on airborne observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2024JD041168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024JD041168</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Nussbaumer et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Nussbaumer, C. M., Pozzer, A., Hewson, M., Ort, L., Krumm, B., Byron, J., Williams, J. D., Joppe, P., Obersteiner, F., Zahn, A., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Low tropospheric ozone over the Indo Pacific warm pool related to non electrified convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2024GL112788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112788" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2024GL112788</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Oltmans and Levy(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Oltmans, S. J. and Levy, H.: Surface ozone measurements from a global network, Atmos. Environ., 28, 9–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90019-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/1352-2310(94)90019-1</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Oltmans et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Oltmans, S. J., Lefohn, A. S., Shadwick, D., Harris, J. M., Scheel, H. E., Galbally, I., Tarasick, D. W., Johnson, B. J., Brunke, E.-G., Claude, H., Zeng, G., Nichol, S., Schmidlin, F., Davies, J., Cuevas, E., Redondas, A., Naoe, H., Nakano, T., and Kawasato, T.: Recent tropospheric ozone changes – a pattern dominated by slow or no growth, Atmos. Environ., 67, 331–351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.057" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.057</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Ou Yang et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Ou Yang, C.-F., Lin, N.-H., Sheu, G.-R., Lee, C.-T., and Wang, J.-L.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of ozone at a high-altitude mountain baseline station in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 46, 279–288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.060</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Palm et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Palm, M., v. Savigny, C., Warneke, T., Velazco, V., Notholt, J., Künzi, K., Burrows, J., and Schrems, O.: Intercomparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles observed by SCIAMACHY and ground based microwave instruments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2091–2098, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2091-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2091-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Petetin et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Petetin, H., Thouret, V., Athier, G., Blot, R., Boulanger, D., Cousin, J.-M., Gaudel, A., Nédélec, P., and Cooper, O. R.: Diurnal cycle of ozone throughout the troposphere over Frankfurt as measured by MOZAIC-IAGOS commercial aircraft, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000129" ext-link-type="DOI">10.12952/journal.elementa.000129</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Platnick et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Platnick, S., Meyer, K. G., Hubanks, P., Holz, R., Ackerman, S. A., and Heidinger, A. K.: MODIS/Aqua Cloud Properties Daily L3 Global 1Deg CMG (CLDPROP_D3_MODIS_Aqua), LAADS DAAC [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_D3.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_D3.061</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Platnick et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Platnick, S., Meyer, K., Wind, G., Holz, R. E., Amarasinghe, N., Hubanks, P. A., Marchant, B., Dutcher, S., and Veglio, P.: The NASA MODIS-VIIRS continuity cloud optical properties products, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 2, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs13010002</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Prather and Zhu(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Prather, M. J. and Zhu, X.: Lifetimes and timescales of tropospheric ozone, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 12, 112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1525/elementa.2023.00112</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Rex et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Rex, M., Wohltmann, I., Ridder, T., Lehmann, R., Rosenlof, K., Wennberg, P., Weisenstein, D., Notholt, J., Krüger, K., Mohr, V., and Tegtmeier, S.: A tropical West Pacific OH minimum and implications for stratospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4827–4841, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4827-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-4827-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Ridder et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Ridder, T., Gerbig, C., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Schrems, O., Warneke, T., and Zhang, L.: Ship-borne FTIR measurements of CO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Western Pacific from 43° N to 35° S: an evaluation of the sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 815–828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-815-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-815-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><label>Rodgers(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Rodgers, C.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, World Scientific, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/3171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/3171</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Rodgers and Connor(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Rodgers, C. D. and Connor, B. J.: Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002299" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002299</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Rudlosky and Shea(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Rudlosky, S. D. and Shea, D. T.: Evaluating WWLLN performance relative to TRMM/LIS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4006–4011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/grl.50428</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><label>Schneider et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Schneider, M., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Redondas, A., and Cuevas, E.: Quality assessment of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles measured by a state-of-the-art ground-based FTIR observing system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5579–5588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5579-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-5579-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><label>Schumann and Huntrieser(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><label>Singh et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Singh, H. B., Gregory, G. L., Anderson, B., Browell, E., Sachse, G. W., Davis, D. D., Crawford, J., Bradshaw, J. D., Talbot, R., Blake, D. R., Thornton, D., Newell, R., and Merrill, J.: Low ozone in the marine boundary layer of the tropical Pacific Ocean: photochemical loss, chlorine atoms, and entrainment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 1907–1917, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95JD01028</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Stein et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>Strode et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Strode, S. A., Oman, L. D., Strahan, S. E., Kort, E. A., Duncan, B. N., Fang, X., Worden, J. R., and Newman, P. A.: Global changes in the diurnal cycle of surface ozone, Atmos. Environ., 199, 323–333, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.028</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Sun(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Sun, X.: Palau FTIR tropospheric ozone column (0.2–10.2 km), Sep–Oct 2022 (v1.0), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17456752" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.17456752</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><label>Sun et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Sun, X., Palm, M., Müller, K., Hachmeister, J., and Notholt, J.: Determination of the chemical equator from GEOS-Chem model simulation: a focus on the tropical western Pacific region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7075–7090, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Sun et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>Sun, X., Ritter, C., Müller, K., Palm, M., Ji, D., Ruhe, W., Beninga, I., Patris, S., and Notholt, J.: Properties of cirrus cloud observed over Koror, Palau (7.3°N, 134.5°E), in tropical western Pacific region, Remote Sens.-Basel, 16, 1448, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs16081448</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Sun et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>Sun, X., Müller, K., Palm, M., Ritter, C., Ji, D., Röpke, T. B., and Notholt, J.: Evidence of tropospheric uplift into the stratosphere via the tropical western Pacific cold trap, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6881–6902, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6881-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-6881-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><label>The International GEOS-Chem User Community(2022)</label><mixed-citation>The International GEOS-Chem User Community: geoschem/GCClassic: GEOS-Chem 13.4.0, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6511970" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.6511970</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Vigouroux et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Vigouroux, C., De Mazière, M., Demoulin, P., Servais, C., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Kramer, I., Schneider, M., Mellqvist, J., Strandberg, A., Velazco, V., Notholt, J., Sussmann, R., Stremme, W., Rockmann, A., Gardiner, T., Coleman, M., and Woods, P.: Evaluation of tropospheric and stratospheric ozone trends over Western Europe from ground-based FTIR network observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6865–6886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6865-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6865-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Vigouroux et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Coffey, M., Errera, Q., García, O., Jones, N. B., Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Mellqvist, J., Notholt, J., Palm, M., Persson, G., Schneider, M., Servais, C., Smale, D., Thölix, L., and De Mazière, M.: Trends of ozone total columns and vertical distribution from FTIR observations at eight NDACC stations around the globe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2915–2933, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><label>Villamayor et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>Villamayor, J., Iglesias-Suárez, F., Cuevas, C. A., Fernández, R. P., Li, Q., Ábalos, M., Hossaini, R., Chipperfield, M. P., Kinnison, D. E., Tilmes, S., Lamarque, J., and Saiz López, A.: Very short lived halogens amplify ozone depletion trends in the tropical lower stratosphere, Nat. Clim. Change, 13, 554–560, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01671-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-023-01671-y</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Virts et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Virts, K. S., Wallace, J. M., Hutchins, M. L., and Holzworth, R. H.: Highlights of a new ground-based, hourly global lightning climatology, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1381–1391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00082.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00082.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>von Clarmann(2014)</label><mixed-citation>von Clarmann, T.: Smoothing error pitfalls, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3023–3034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3023-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3023-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>WMO(2022)</label><mixed-citation>WMO – World Meteorological Organization: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022, Tech. rep., GAW Report No. 278, WMO, Geneva, 509 pp., <uri>https://library.wmo.int/viewer/58360/#page=1&amp;viewer=picture&amp;o=bookmarks&amp;n=0&amp;q=</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>World Health Organization(2021)</label><mixed-citation>World Health Organization: WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide, Tech. rep., World Health Organization, Geneva, <uri>https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228</uri> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2021. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Xia et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>Xia, N., Du, E., Guo, Z., and de Vries, W.: The diurnal cycle of summer tropospheric ozone concentrations across Chinese cities: spatial patterns and main drivers, Environ. Pollut., 286, 117547, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117547" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117547</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Yin et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Yin, X., Kang, S., de Foy, B., Cong, Z., Luo, J., Zhang, L., Ma, Y., Zhang, G., Rupakheti, D., and Zhang, Q.: Surface ozone at Nam Co in the inland Tibetan Plateau: variation, synthesis comparison and regional representativeness, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11293–11311, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11293-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-11293-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx86"><label>Yuan et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Yuan, T., Remer, L. A., Pickering, K. E., and Yu, H.: Observational evidence of aerosol enhancement of lightning activity and convective invigoration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04701, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046052" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL046052</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Ziemke et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., Duncan, B. N., Froidevaux, L., Bhartia, P. K., Levelt, P. F., and Waters, J. W.: Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura OMI and MLS: evaluation of measurements and comparison with the Global Modeling Initiative's Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007089</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Tropospheric low ozone and its diurnal cycle  over the Western Pacific warm pool from  solar absorption FTIR observations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ainsworth(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Ainsworth, E. A.: Understanding and improving global crop response to ozone pollution, Plant J., 90, 886–897, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13298" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13298</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Amador and Arce-Fernández(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Amador, J. A. and Arce-Fernández, D.: WWLLN hot and cold-spots of lightning activity and their relation to climate in an extended central America region (2012–2020), Atmosphere-Basel, 13, 76, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13010076</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Anderson et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Anderson, D. C., Pickering, K. E., Huey, L. G., Bradshaw, J. D., Crawford, J. H., Blake, D. R., Atlas, E. L., Ravetta, A. R., Avery, M. A., Campos, T. L., Weinheimer, A. J., Sachse, G. W., Sandholm, S. T., Sachse, G. W., Talbot, R. W., Wennberg, P. O., Crawford, J. H., Wennberg, P. O., and Prather, M. J.: A pervasive role for biomass burning in tropical high ozone/low water structures, Nat. Commun., 7, 10267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10267</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bernier et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bernier, C., Wang, Y., Estes, M., Lei, R., Jia, B., Wang, S., and Sun, J.: Clustering surface ozone diurnal cycles to understand the impact of circulation patterns in Houston, TX, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 13457–13474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031725" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031725</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bey et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
       Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000807</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boersma et al.(2017a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., Van Geffen, J., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, T.: QA4ECV NO<sub>2</sub> tropospheric and stratospheric vertical column data from GOME-2A (Version 1.1), KNMI [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-gome2a-v1.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-gome2a-v1.1</a>, 2017a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Boersma et al.(2017b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., Van Geffen, J., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, T.: QA4ECV NO<sub>2</sub> tropospheric and stratospheric vertical column data from SCIAMACHY (Version 1.1), KNMI [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-scia-v1.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-scia-v1.1</a>, 2017b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Boersma et al.(2017c)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., Van Geffen, J., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., and Wagner, T.: QA4ECV NO<sub>2</sub> tropospheric and stratospheric vertical column data from OMI (Version 1.1), KNMI [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-omi-v1.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.21944/qa4ecv-no2-omi-v1.1</a>, 2017c.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Boersma et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle, S., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Zara, M., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M., Wagner, T., Maasakkers, J. D., van der A, R. J., Nightingale, J., De Rudder, A., Irie, H., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., and Compernolle, S. C.: Improving algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO<sub>2</sub> retrievals: results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables (QA4ECV) project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6651–6678, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Braga et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Braga, R. C., Rosenfeld, D., Krüger, O. O., Ervens, B., Holanda, B. A., Wendisch, M., Krisna, T., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Voigt, C., and Pöhlker, M. L.: Linear relationship between effective radius and precipitation water content near the top of convective clouds: measurement results from ACRIDICON–CHUVA campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14079–14088, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14079-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14079-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Caram et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Caram, C., Szopa, S., Cozic, A., Bekki, S., Cuevas, C. A., and Saiz-Lopez, A.: Sensitivity of tropospheric ozone to halogen chemistry in the chemistry–climate model LMDZ-INCA vNMHC, Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 4041–4062, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4041-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4041-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Cecil et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       Cecil, D. J., Buechler, D. E., and Blakeslee, R. J.: Gridded lightning climatology from TRMM-LIS and OTD: dataset description, Atmos. Res., 135–136, 404–414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Chen et al.(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, J., Xu, J., Wu, Z., Meng, X., Yu, Y., Ginoux, P., DeMott, P. J., Xu, R., Zhai, L., Yan, Y., Zhao, C., Li, S.-M., Zhu, T., and Hu, M.: Decreased dust particles amplify the cloud cooling effect by regulating cloud ice formation over the Tibetan Plateau, Science Advances, 10, eado0885, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado0885" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.ado0885</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Chen et al.(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, Z., Liu, R., Wu, S., Xu, J., Wu, Y., and Qi, S.: Diurnal variation characteristics and meteorological causes of autumn ozone in the Pearl River Delta, China, Sci. Total Environ., 908, 168469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168469" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168469</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Christian et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
       Christian, H. J., Blakeslee, R. J., Boccippio, D. J., Boeck, W. L., Buechler, D. E., Driscoll, K. T., Goodman, S. J., Hall, J. M., Koshak, W. J., Mach, D. M., and Stewart, M. F.: Global frequency and distribution of lightning as observed from space by the Optical Transient Detector, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, ACL 4-1–ACL 4-15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002347" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002347</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Christiansen et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Christiansen, A., Mickley, L. J., Liu, J., Oman, L. D., and Hu, L.: Multidecadal increases in global tropospheric ozone derived from ozonesonde and surface site observations: can models reproduce ozone trends?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14751–14782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14751-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14751-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Crawford et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
       Crawford, J. H., Davis, D. D., Chen, G., Bradshaw, J., Sandholm, S., Kondo, Y., Merrill, J., Liu, S., Browell, E., Gregory, G., Anderson, B., Sachse, G., Barrick, J., Blake, D., Talbot, R., and Pueschel, R.: Implications of large scale shifts in tropospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> levels in the remote tropical Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 28447–28468, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD00011</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>De Smedt et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
De Smedt, I., Yu, H., Richter, A., Beirle, S., Eskes, H., Boersma, K. F., Van Roozendael, M., Van Geffen, J., Wagner, T., Lorente, A., and Peters, E.: QA4ECV HCHO tropospheric column data from OMI, Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.18758/71021031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18758/71021031</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>De Smedt et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       De Smedt, I., Theys, N., Yu, H., Danckaert, T., Lerot, C., Compernolle, S., Van Roozendael, M., Richter, A., Hilboll, A., Peters, E., Pedergnana, M., Loyola, D., Beirle, S., Wagner, T., Eskes, H., van Geffen, J., Boersma, K. F., and Veefkind, P.: Algorithm theoretical baseline for formaldehyde retrievals from S5P TROPOMI and from the QA4ECV project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2395–2426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2395-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2395-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Fueglistaler et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
       Fueglistaler, S. A., Dessler, A. E., Dunkerton, T. J., Folkins, I., Fu, Q., and Mote, P. W.: Tropical tropopause layer, Rev. Geophys., 47, RG1004, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000267" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008RG000267</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Gao et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       Gao, R., Rosenlof, K. H., Fahey, D. W., Wennberg, P. O., Hintsa, E. J., and Hanisco, T. F.: OH in the tropical upper troposphere and its relationships to solar radiation and reactive nitrogen, J. Atmos. Chem., 71, 55–64, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-014-9280-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10874-014-9280-2</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Gordon et al.(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Gordon, I., Rothman, L., Hargreaves, R., Hashemi, R., Karlovets, E., Skinner, F., Conway, E., Hill, C., Kochanov, R., Tan, Y., Wcisło, P., Finenko, A., Nelson, K., Bernath, P., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Campargue, A., Chance, K., Coustenis, A., Drouin, B., Flaud, J., Gamache, R., Hodges, J., Jacquemart, D., Mlawer, E., Nikitin, A., Perevalov, V., Rotger, M., Tennyson, J., Toon, G., Tran, H., Tyuterev, V., Adkins, E., Baker, A., Barbe, A., Canè, E., Császár, A., Dudaryonok, A., Egorov, O., Fleisher, A., Fleurbaey, H., Foltynowicz, A., Furtenbacher, T., Harrison, J., Hartmann, J., Horneman, V., Huang, X., Karman, T., Karns, J., Kassi, S., Kleiner, I., Kofman, V., Kwabia–Tchana, F., Lavrentieva, N., Lee, T., Long, D., Lukashevskaya, A., Lyulin, O., Makhnev, V., Matt, W., Massie, S., Melosso, M., Mikhailenko, S., Mondelain, D., Müller, H., Naumenko, O., Perrin, A., Polyansky, O., Raddaoui, E., Raston, P., Reed, Z., Rey, M., Richard, C., Tóbiás, R., Sadiek, I., Schwenke, D., Starikova, E., Sung, K., Tamassia, F., Tashkun, S., Vander Auwera, J., Vasilenko, I., Vigasin, A., Villanueva, G., Vispoel, B., Wagner, G., Yachmenev, A., and Yurchenko, S.: The HITRAN2020 molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 277, 107949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Han et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Han, Y., Luo, H., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., and Dong, W.: Cloud ice fraction governs lightning rate at a global scale, Communications Earth and Environment, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00233-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00233-4</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>He et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       He, G., He, C., Wang, H., Lu, X., Pei, C., Qiu, X., Liu, C., Wang, Y., Liu, N., Zhang, J., Lei, L., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Deng, T., Fan, Q., and Fan, S.: Nighttime ozone in the lower boundary layer: insights from 3-year tower-based measurements in South China and regional air quality modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13107–13124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13107-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13107-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Holton and Gettelman(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
       Holton, J. R. and Gettelman, A.: Horizontal transport and the dehydration of the stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 951–954, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL012061</a>, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Hu et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hu, L., Jacob, D. J., Liu, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Kim, P. S., Sulprizio, M. P., and Yantosca, R. M.: Global budget of tropospheric ozone: evaluating recent model advances with satellite (OMI), aircraft (IAGOS), and ozonesonde observations, Atmos. Environ., 167, 323–334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.08.036</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Huang et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
       Huang, S., Yang, J., Li, J., Chen, Q., Zhang, Q., and Guo, F.: Impact of secondary ice production on thunderstorm electrification under different aerosol conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 1831–1850, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1831-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hutchins et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
       Hutchins, M. L., Holzworth, R. H., Brundell, J. B., and Rodger, C. J.: Relative detection efficiency of the World Wide Lightning Location Network, Radio Sci., 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RS005049" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RS005049</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Ji et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ji, D., Ritter, C., Sun, X., Moser, M., Voigt, C., Palm, M., and Notholt, J.: Giant Cloud Condensation Nuclei enhanced Ice Sublimation Process: a potential mechanism in mixed-phase clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 13037–13052, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13037-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13037-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kanamitsu(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kanamitsu, M.: Description of the NMC global data assimilation and forecast system, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Kaplan and Lau(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kaplan, J. O. and Lau, K. H.-K.: The WGLC global gridded lightning climatology and time series, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 3219–3237, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3219-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-3219-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Kaplan and Lau(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kaplan, J. O. and Lau, K. H.-K.: World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) Global Lightning Climatology (WGLC) and time series, 2022 update, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 14, 5665–5670, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5665-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-5665-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Keller et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       Keller, C. A., Long, M. S., Yantosca, R. M., Da Silva, A. M., Pawson, S., and Jacob, D. J.: HEMCO v1.0: a versatile, ESMF-compliant component for calculating emissions in atmospheric models, Geosci. Model Dev., 7, 1409–1417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-7-1409-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>King et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       King, M. D., Platnick, S., Menzel, W. P., Ackerman, S. A., and Hubanks, P. A.: Spatial and temporal distribution of clouds observed by MODIS onboard the Terra and Aqua satellites, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 3826–3852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227333</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Kley et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kley, D., Crutzen, P. J., Smit, H. G. J., Vömel, H., Oltmans, S. J., Grassl, H., and Ramanathan, V.: Observations of near-zero ozone concentrations over the convective Pacific: effects on air chemistry, Science, 274, 230–233, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5285.230" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5285.230</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Kley et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
       Kley, D., Smit, H. G. J., Vömel, H., Grassl, H., Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P. J., Williams, S., Meywerk, J., and Oltmans, S. J.: Tropospheric water-vapour and ozone cross-sections in a zonal plane over the central equatorial Pacific Ocean, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 123, 2009–2040, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354312" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712354312</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>LATMOS(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
LATMOS: Monthly IASI/Metop-B ULB-LATMOS carbon monoxide (CO) Climate Data Record (CDR) L3 products (total column gridded data), <a href="https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 September 2025) (generated with FORLI v20151001 from EUMETSAT IASI Level 2 CO CDR Release 1. See also: Clerbaux et al., J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 113, 1391–1408, 2012), 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Levy(1971)</label><mixed-citation>
       Levy, H.: Normal atmosphere: large radical and formaldehyde concentrations predicted, Science, 173, 141–143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3992.141" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.173.3992.141</a>, 1971.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Li et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, D., Vogel, B., Müller, R., Bian, J., Günther, G., Ploeger, F., Li, Q., Zhang, J., Bai, Z., Vömel, H., and Riese, M.: Dehydration and low ozone in the tropopause layer over the Asian monsoon caused by tropical cyclones: Lagrangian transport calculations using ERA-Interim and ERA5 reanalysis data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 4133–4152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-4133-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Lin et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Lin, H., Jacob, D. J., Lundgren, E. W., Sulprizio, M. P., Keller, C. A., Fritz, T. M., Eastham, S. D., Emmons, L. K., Campbell, P. C., Baker, B., Saylor, R. D., and Montuoro, R.: Harmonized Emissions Component (HEMCO) 3.0 as a versatile emissions component for atmospheric models: application in the GEOS-Chem, NASA GEOS, WRF-GC, CESM2, NOAA GEFS-Aerosol, and NOAA UFS models, Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 5487–5506, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-5487-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Liu et al.(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
       Liu, S. C., McFarland, M., Lasslo, J., Heikes, B. G., and McConnell, J. C.: Tropospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and O<sub>3</sub> budgets in the Equatorial Pacific, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 88, 1360–1368, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC02p01360" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC088iC02p01360</a>, 1983.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Mills et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mills, G., Sharps, K., Simpson, D., Pleijel, H., Broberg, M., Uddling, J., Harmens, H., Hayes, F., Danielsson, H., Gerosa, G., Harmens, H., Kobayashi, K., Saxena, P., Paoletti, E., Sinha, V., and Xu, X.: Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report: present-day tropospheric ozone distribution and trends relevant to vegetation, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 6, 47, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.302</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Monks(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
       Monks, P. S.: A review of the observations and origins of the spring ozone maximum, Atmos. Environ., 34, 3545–3561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00129-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00129-1</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Müller et al.(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>
       Müller, K., Tradowsky, J. S., von der Gathen, P., Ritter, C., Patris, S., Notholt, J., and Rex, M.: Measurement report: The Palau Atmospheric Observatory and its ozonesonde record – continuous monitoring of tropospheric composition and dynamics in the tropical western Pacific, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 2169–2193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2169-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-2169-2024</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Müller et al.(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>
       Müller, K., von der Gathen, P., and Rex, M.: Air mass transport to the tropical western Pacific troposphere inferred from ozone and relative humidity balloon observations above Palau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4693–4716, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4693-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4693-2024</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Müller et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Müller, K., Graeser, J., Patris, S., Beninga, I., Ruhe, W., Ucharm, G., Tradowsky, J., Rüther, L., and Röpke, T.: Ozone sonde and radio sonde data record Palau Atmospheric Observatory 2016–2024 [Data set], Zenodo [datea set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19383947" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19383947</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Myhre et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Myhre, G., Shindell, D., Bréon, F.-M., Collins, W., Fuglestvedt, J., Huang, J., Koch, D., Lamarque, J.-F., Lee, D., Mendoza, B., Nakajima, T., Robock, A., Stephens, G., Takemura, T., and Zhang, H.: Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.018</a>, 659–740, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Navarro et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navarro, E. A., Portí, J. A., Salinas, A., Toledo-Redondo, S., Segura-García, J., Castilla, A., Montagud-Camps, V., and Albert, I.: The World Wide Lightning Location Network (WWLLN) over Spain, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 3925–3943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3925-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-3925-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>NCAR(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
NCAR – National Center for Atmospheric Research: SFIT4 Retrieval Code, <a href="https://github.com/NCAR/sfit-core-code" target="_blank"/> (last access: 22 June 2025), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Newton et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
       Newton, R., Vaughan, G., Hintsa, E., Filus, M. T., Pan, L. L., Honomichl, S., Atlas, E., Andrews, S. J., and Carpenter, L. J.: Observations of ozone-poor air in the tropical tropopause layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5157–5171, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5157-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5157-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Nussbaumer et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nussbaumer, C. M., Tadic, I., Dienhart, D., Wang, N., Edtbauer, A., Ernle, L., Williams, J., Obersteiner, F., Gutiérrez-Álvarez, I., Harder, H., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Measurement report: In situ observations of deep convection without lightning during the tropical cyclone Florence 2018, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7933–7945, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7933-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7933-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Nussbaumer et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nussbaumer, C. M., Kohl, M., Pozzer, A., Tadic, I., Rohloff, R., Marno, D., Harder, H., Ziereis, H., Zahn, A., Obersteiner, F., Hofzumahaus, A., Fuchs, H., Künstler, C., Brune, W. H., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Thompson, C. R., Bourgeois, I., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Ozone formation sensitivity to precursors and lightning in the tropical troposphere based on airborne observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 129, e2024JD041168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041168" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024JD041168</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Nussbaumer et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
       Nussbaumer, C. M., Pozzer, A., Hewson, M., Ort, L., Krumm, B., Byron, J., Williams, J. D., Joppe, P., Obersteiner, F., Zahn, A., Lelieveld, J., and Fischer, H.: Low tropospheric ozone over the Indo Pacific warm pool related to non electrified convection, Geophys. Res. Lett., 52, e2024GL112788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112788" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL112788</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Oltmans and Levy(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
       Oltmans, S. J. and Levy, H.: Surface ozone measurements from a global network, Atmos. Environ., 28, 9–24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90019-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)90019-1</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Oltmans et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Oltmans, S. J., Lefohn, A. S., Shadwick, D., Harris, J. M., Scheel, H. E., Galbally, I., Tarasick, D. W., Johnson, B. J., Brunke, E.-G., Claude, H., Zeng, G., Nichol, S., Schmidlin, F., Davies, J., Cuevas, E., Redondas, A., Naoe, H., Nakano, T., and Kawasato, T.: Recent tropospheric ozone changes – a pattern dominated by slow or no growth, Atmos. Environ., 67, 331–351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.057" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.10.057</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Ou Yang et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
       Ou Yang, C.-F., Lin, N.-H., Sheu, G.-R., Lee, C.-T., and Wang, J.-L.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of ozone at a high-altitude mountain baseline station in East Asia, Atmos. Environ., 46, 279–288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.09.060</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Palm et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
       Palm, M., v. Savigny, C., Warneke, T., Velazco, V., Notholt, J., Künzi, K., Burrows, J., and Schrems, O.: Intercomparison of O<sub>3</sub> profiles observed by SCIAMACHY and ground based microwave instruments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2091–2098, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2091-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2091-2005</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Petetin et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
       Petetin, H., Thouret, V., Athier, G., Blot, R., Boulanger, D., Cousin, J.-M., Gaudel, A., Nédélec, P., and Cooper, O. R.: Diurnal cycle of ozone throughout the troposphere over Frankfurt as measured by MOZAIC-IAGOS commercial aircraft, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 4, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000129" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000129</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Platnick et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Platnick, S., Meyer, K. G., Hubanks, P., Holz, R., Ackerman, S. A., and Heidinger, A. K.: MODIS/Aqua Cloud Properties Daily L3 Global 1Deg CMG (CLDPROP_D3_MODIS_Aqua), LAADS DAAC [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_D3.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_D3.061</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Platnick et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Platnick, S., Meyer, K., Wind, G., Holz, R. E., Amarasinghe, N., Hubanks, P. A., Marchant, B., Dutcher, S., and Veglio, P.: The NASA MODIS-VIIRS continuity cloud optical properties products, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 2, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13010002</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Prather and Zhu(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Prather, M. J. and Zhu, X.: Lifetimes and timescales of tropospheric ozone, Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene, 12, 112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00112</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Rex et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       Rex, M., Wohltmann, I., Ridder, T., Lehmann, R., Rosenlof, K., Wennberg, P., Weisenstein, D., Notholt, J., Krüger, K., Mohr, V., and Tegtmeier, S.: A tropical West Pacific OH minimum and implications for stratospheric composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4827–4841, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4827-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4827-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Ridder et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
       Ridder, T., Gerbig, C., Notholt, J., Rex, M., Schrems, O., Warneke, T., and Zhang, L.: Ship-borne FTIR measurements of CO and O<sub>3</sub> in the Western Pacific from 43° N to 35° S: an evaluation of the sources, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 815–828, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-815-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-815-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Rodgers(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rodgers, C.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, World Scientific, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/3171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/3171</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Rodgers and Connor(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
       Rodgers, C. D. and Connor, B. J.: Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002299" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002299</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Rudlosky and Shea(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Rudlosky, S. D. and Shea, D. T.: Evaluating WWLLN performance relative to TRMM/LIS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4006–4011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50428</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Schneider et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
       Schneider, M., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Redondas, A., and Cuevas, E.: Quality assessment of O<sub>3</sub> profiles measured by a state-of-the-art ground-based FTIR observing system, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5579–5588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5579-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5579-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Schumann and Huntrieser(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
       Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Singh et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
       Singh, H. B., Gregory, G. L., Anderson, B., Browell, E., Sachse, G. W., Davis, D. D., Crawford, J., Bradshaw, J. D., Talbot, R., Blake, D. R., Thornton, D., Newell, R., and Merrill, J.: Low ozone in the marine boundary layer of the tropical Pacific Ocean: photochemical loss, chlorine atoms, and entrainment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 1907–1917, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95JD01028</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Stein et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>Strode et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
       Strode, S. A., Oman, L. D., Strahan, S. E., Kort, E. A., Duncan, B. N., Fang, X., Worden, J. R., and Newman, P. A.: Global changes in the diurnal cycle of surface ozone, Atmos. Environ., 199, 323–333, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.028</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Sun(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sun, X.: Palau FTIR tropospheric ozone column (0.2–10.2&thinsp;km), Sep–Oct 2022 (v1.0), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17456752" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17456752</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Sun et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sun, X., Palm, M., Müller, K., Hachmeister, J., and Notholt, J.: Determination of the chemical equator from GEOS-Chem model simulation: a focus on the tropical western Pacific region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 7075–7090, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-7075-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Sun et al.(2024)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sun, X., Ritter, C., Müller, K., Palm, M., Ji, D., Ruhe, W., Beninga, I., Patris, S., and Notholt, J.: Properties of cirrus cloud observed over Koror, Palau (7.3°N, 134.5°E), in tropical western Pacific region, Remote Sens.-Basel, 16, 1448, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16081448</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Sun et al.(2025)</label><mixed-citation>
       Sun, X., Müller, K., Palm, M., Ritter, C., Ji, D., Röpke, T. B., and Notholt, J.: Evidence of tropospheric uplift into the stratosphere via the tropical western Pacific cold trap, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 6881–6902, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6881-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-6881-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>The International GEOS-Chem User Community(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
       The International GEOS-Chem User Community: geoschem/GCClassic: GEOS-Chem 13.4.0, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6511970" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6511970</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Vigouroux et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vigouroux, C., De Mazière, M., Demoulin, P., Servais, C., Hase, F., Blumenstock, T., Kramer, I., Schneider, M., Mellqvist, J., Strandberg, A., Velazco, V., Notholt, J., Sussmann, R., Stremme, W., Rockmann, A., Gardiner, T., Coleman, M., and Woods, P.: Evaluation of tropospheric and stratospheric ozone trends over Western Europe from ground-based FTIR network observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6865–6886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6865-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6865-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Vigouroux et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Vigouroux, C., Blumenstock, T., Coffey, M., Errera, Q., García, O., Jones, N. B., Hannigan, J. W., Hase, F., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Mellqvist, J., Notholt, J., Palm, M., Persson, G., Schneider, M., Servais, C., Smale, D., Thölix, L., and De Mazière, M.: Trends of ozone total columns and vertical distribution from FTIR observations at eight NDACC stations around the globe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2915–2933, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2915-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Villamayor et al.(2023)</label><mixed-citation>
       Villamayor, J., Iglesias-Suárez, F., Cuevas, C. A., Fernández, R. P., Li, Q., Ábalos, M., Hossaini, R., Chipperfield, M. P., Kinnison, D. E., Tilmes, S., Lamarque, J., and Saiz López, A.: Very short lived halogens amplify ozone depletion trends in the tropical lower stratosphere, Nat. Clim. Change, 13, 554–560, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01671-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01671-y</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Virts et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
       Virts, K. S., Wallace, J. M., Hutchins, M. L., and Holzworth, R. H.: Highlights of a new ground-based, hourly global lightning climatology, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1381–1391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00082.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00082.1</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>von Clarmann(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
       von Clarmann, T.: Smoothing error pitfalls, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3023–3034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3023-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3023-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>WMO(2022)</label><mixed-citation>
      
WMO – World Meteorological Organization: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2022, Tech. rep., GAW Report No. 278, WMO, Geneva, 509&thinsp;pp., <a href="https://library.wmo.int/viewer/58360/#page=1&amp;viewer=picture&amp;o=bookmarks&amp;n=0&amp;q=" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>World Health Organization(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
      
World Health
Organization: WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub>), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide, Tech. rep., World Health Organization, Geneva,
<a href="https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034228" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 April 2026), 2021.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Xia et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
       Xia, N., Du, E., Guo, Z., and de Vries, W.: The diurnal cycle of summer tropospheric ozone concentrations across Chinese cities: spatial patterns and main drivers, Environ. Pollut., 286, 117547, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117547" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117547</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Yin et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yin, X., Kang, S., de Foy, B., Cong, Z., Luo, J., Zhang, L., Ma, Y., Zhang, G., Rupakheti, D., and Zhang, Q.: Surface ozone at Nam Co in the inland Tibetan Plateau: variation, synthesis comparison and regional representativeness, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11293–11311, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11293-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11293-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Yuan et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
       Yuan, T., Remer, L. A., Pickering, K. E., and Yu, H.: Observational evidence of aerosol enhancement of lightning activity and convective invigoration, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04701, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046052" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046052</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Ziemke et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
       Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., Duncan, B. N., Froidevaux, L., Bhartia, P. K., Levelt, P. F., and Waters, J. W.: Tropospheric ozone determined from Aura OMI and MLS: evaluation of measurements and comparison with the Global Modeling Initiative's Chemical Transport Model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007089</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
