<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ACP</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ACP</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Chem. Phys.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7324</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-26-4823-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Mechanistic investigations of the formation of multifunctional products from the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene</article-title><alt-title>The formation of multifunctional products from the oxidation of styrene</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Long</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Yu</given-names></name>
          <email>huangyu@ieecas.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>Yonggang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>Long</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Jia</surname><given-names>Zhihui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>State Key Laboratory of Loess Science, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi'an, 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Observation and Research Station of Regional Ecological Environment Change and Comprehensive Management in the Guanzhong Plain, Xi'an, 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Atmospheric and Haze-fog Pollution Prevention, Xi'an, 710061, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710119, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yu Huang (huangyu@ieecas.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>April</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>26</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>4823</fpage><lpage>4840</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>23</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Long Chen et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026.html">This article is available from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e150">Styrene is a highly reactive aromatic hydrocarbon that has been identified as a key secondary organic aerosol (SOA) precursor. Recent laboratory chamber experiments have identified <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series compounds as the main components of SOA in the photooxidation of styrene. However, their molecular structures and formation pathways remain largely uncharacterized.  Herein, the formation mechanisms of multifunctional products from the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene are studied using the quantum chemistry methods. The calculations show that the first generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals can either proceed unimolecular decomposition to yield benzaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O), or undergo bimolecular reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/NO to form the first generation closed-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>- and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-products, hydroperoxide 1st-ROOH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), benzaldehyde, and organic nitrate 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the second generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, OH-addition reaction occurring at the <italic>ortho</italic>-site of 1st-ROOH and 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a significant dominance. The <italic>ortho</italic>-OH-addition products can proceed through two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition steps and a cyclization process to produce the peroxide bicyclic peroxy radicals (BPR). BPR can further react with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/NO to form the second generation closed-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-products, hydroperoxide 2nd-ROOH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), organic nitrate 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and other multifunctional products, in which the first two products have fractional yields of 41.4 % and 4.8 %, respectively. For the third generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, OH-addition occurring at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> double bond of 2nd-ROOH and 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the lowest barrier.  The major third generation closed-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-products are the multifunctional hydroperoxides and organic nitrates. These findings carry important implications for advancing our understanding of the chemical composition and formation mechanisms of aromatic SOA.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42175134</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e477">Aromatic compounds are recognized as the significant secondary organic aerosol (SOA) precursors, accounting for 20 %–30 % of the total volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of the urban atmosphere (Xu et al., 2020; Yan et al., 2019; Yu et al., 2022a, b; Cabrera-Perez et al., 2016; Iyer et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2017; Bloss et al., 2005; Forstner et al., 1997). The primary sources include the incomplete combustion, solvent evaporation, and industrial emission, and the secondary sources involve the biofuel and biomass burning (Xu et al., 2020; Cabrera-Perez et al., 2016; Li et al., 2019). The most abundant aromatic compounds, including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, styrene and trimethylbenzenes, are highly present in urban environments (Cabrera-Perez et al., 2016; Koppmann, 2008). The degradation of aromatic compounds initiated by the atmospheric oxidants (e.g., OH radicals, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Cl atom) leads to the production of multifunctional molecules (e.g., nitroaromatics, dicarbonyls, cresols, epoxides) (Ji et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2014; Fu et al., 2023; Wang and Li, 2021; Wang et al., 2013, 2020b; Zaytsev et al., 2019), significantly contributing to new particle formation (NPF) and SOA formation (up to 50 % in eastern China) in the atmosphere (Wang et al., 2017, 2020a; Garmash et al., 2020; Molteni et al., 2018; Nie et al., 2022).</p>
      <p id="d2e512">The secondary organic aerosol formation potential (SOAP) of aromatics is significantly greater than that of alkanes and alkenes during haze episodes in Beijing (Sun et al., 2016). Among these precursors, toluene is the predominant SOA-forming species, contributing more than 16 % of the total SOA, followed by styrene (15 %) and ethylbenzene (9.5 %) (Sun et al., 2016). Styrene is primarily emitted from the anthropogenic activities such as solvent usage and vehicle exhaust (Cho et al., 2014; Wu et al., 2021), which is detected at the ppb levels in urban environments, with the mixing ratios of 0.06–4.50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Cho et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2019). Styrene has been classified as a hazardous air pollutant in the 1990 Clean Air Act due to the potential mutagen and carcinogen (Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 1990). Therefore, it is very necessary to investigate the degradation mechanisms of styrene under atmospheric conditions. In general, the atmospheric oxidation of styrene initiated by OH radicals is anticipated to be the dominant daytime sink, and the lifetime is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h under the conditions of typical OH radicals concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Wu et al., 2021; Shen et al., 2022). Due to the existence of highly reactive vinyl and aromatic groups, OH-initiated oxidation of styrene mainly comprise two kinds of pathways: H-abstraction and OH-addition, in which C<sub><italic>β</italic></sub>-site OH-addition reaction is expected to be the predominant pathway (Wu et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2024). The formed products can combine with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule leading to the first generation peroxyl radicals, which can further react with NO resulting in the formation of benzaldehyde and formaldehyde. The barrier of the rate-limiting step is predicted to be 28.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  (Wang et al., 2015), implying that benzaldehyde is unlikely to be the sole primary product in the oxidation of styrene due to their higher barriers. Additionally, carbonyl oxides, formed in the ozonolysis of styrene, serve as the chain units participating in the formation of oligomers (Yu et al., 2022a). The volatility of oligomers decreases dramatically as the successive addition of carbonyl oxides increases, eventually transforming into extremely low volatility organic compounds (ELVOC) and directly participating in NPF.</p>
      <p id="d2e618">Experimentally, Cho et al., investigated the kinetics of the reaction styrene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 240–340 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1–3 Torr using the mass spectrometry technique (Cho et al., 2014). They found that the addition of OH radicals to the vinyl carbons is dominant, and the determined rate coefficient is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at room temperature. In the smog chamber experiments, Tajuelo et al. (2019a, b, c) found that the SOA yields from the photolysis and photooxidation of styrene and its homologous species increase with the concentration of initial reactants increasing, and benzaldehyde, benzoyl chloride, acetophenone and formaldehyde are expected to be the primary gas phase products. Yu et al. (2022b) investigated the formation of SOA from styrene in an indoor chamber under different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH conditions, and found the SOA yields decrease with increasing RH in both the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> systems. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species are the main products in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system, while organic nitrates are the major components in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> system. Although the possible molecular formula and chemical composition of the oxidation products from the reaction styrene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are given in the aforementioned studies, the specific molecular structures and formation pathways remain ambiguous. Additionally, to the best of our knowledge, the majority of studies mainly focus on the first generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation products to date, while the formation mechanisms of multifunctional products from the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene are still limited.</p>
      <p id="d2e819">In the present study, the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation mechanisms of styrene in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/NO are investigated using the quantum chemistry methods. The calculated results arising from the first generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation reactions are presented herein for comparison with the available literatures to ascertain the reliability of the employed theoretical method. For the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation reactions of styrene, all the possible pathways, including H-abstraction, OH-addition, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition, cyclization, ring-opening, intramolecular H-shifts, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond scission, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-elimination, are taken into account. Additionally, the saturated concentrations of the formed multifunctional products are estimated to identify the volatility classes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Computational methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Electronic structures and energy calculations</title>
      <p id="d2e927">The electronic structures and energy calculations of all stationary points, including reactants (R), intermediates (IM), transition states (TS) and products (P), are performed using the Gaussian 16 program (Frisch et al., 2016). Geometric optimizations of all stationary points on the potential energy surfaces (PESs) are carried out at the M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level of theory, since it has reliable performance for describing the noncovalent interactions, thermochemical, and kinetics (Zhao and Truhlar, 2008).  Harmonic vibrational frequencies are determined at the M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) theoretical level to confirm the characteristics of all stationary points (a local minimum or a saddle point). The zero-point vibrational energy (ZPVE) is scaled by a factor of 0.967 (Alecu et al., 2010). Intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations are carried out to ascertain the connection of the given TS between the designated local minima R and P (Fukui, 1981). Single point energy calculations are performed at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd) level based on the M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) optimized geometries.</p>
      <p id="d2e930">In order to further evaluate the reliability of the computational method employed herein, the single point energies of all the stationary points involved in the initial addition of OH radicals to styrene and intramolecular H-shift reactions of the first generation peroxyl radicals S2-1-x are recalculated using the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ method performed using the Orca 6.1 program (Neese, 2025). As shown in Table S1 in the Supplement, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained using the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd) method are consistent with those derived from the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ method. The largest deviation and the average absolute deviation are 1.2 and 0.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, indicating that the computational method employed in this study is reliable. Considering the computational cost, the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd) method is employed to investigate the formation mechanism of multifunctional products from the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene. The energy barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and reaction energy (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are defined as the difference in energy between TS and IM, as well as between P and R.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Conformer research</title>
      <p id="d2e1007"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals formed from the addition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the carbon-centered site of alkyl radicals R have multiple possible conformers due to the different orientations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> attack (Chen et al., 2021; Fu et al., 2020; Møller et al., 2016, 2020). An initial structure of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals is optimized at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level and subsequently used as the starting geometry to perform the conformer search conducted using the Molclus program (Lu, 2024). The resulting structures are initially optimized at the B3LYP/6-31+G(d) level, as this method accurately predicts the relative energy ordering of different conformers (Møller et al., 2016, 2020). For the intramolecular H-shift reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, the lengths of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bonds in the conformational sampling of TSs are constrained to retain the cyclic TS structure. All unique conformers of R, TS and P within 5.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the lowest energy conformer are further optimized at the M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level of theory. Then, the single point energy calculations are performed at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd) level of theory. RO radicals formed by the bimolecular reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and NO also have multiple conformers. In order to obtain the lowest energy conformer, a similar methodology is employed in the present study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Kinetics calculations</title>
      <p id="d2e1149">The rate coefficients of unimolecular reactions, including intramolecular H-shifts, cyclization, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-elimination, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond scissions, are calculated using the RRKM theory along with energy-grained master equation (RRKM-ME) (Holbrook et al., 1996). The rate coefficients of bimolecular reactions, involving H-abstraction and OH-addition, are determined using the traditional transition state theory (TST) (Fernández-Ramos et al., 2007). An asymmetric one-dimensional Eckart model (Eckart, 1930) is employed to consider the tunneling correction factors in the rate coefficient calculations based on RRKM-ME and TST. A single exponential down model in the RRKM-ME calculations is utilized to approximate the collision transfer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>〈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>〉</mml:mo><mml:mtext>down</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The Lennard–Jones parameters of all intermediate species are estimated using the empirical formula as proposed by Gilbert and Smith (1990).</p>
      <p id="d2e1222">For the intramolecular H-shifts of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RO radicals, the rate coefficients are computed using the multiconformer transition state theory (MC-TST) (Møller et al., 2016), which is expressed as Eq. (1) (Møller et al., 2016, 2020; Pasik et al., 2024):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MC-TST</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TS  conf.</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TS,</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R conf.</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>R,</mml:mtext><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TS</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">κ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Eckart tunneling coefficient, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>h</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is Planck's constant, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">B</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is Boltzmann's constant, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the absolute temperature (298.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>TS</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refer to the partition functions of the corresponding transition state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and reactant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> conformers, respectively.  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the relative electronic energies between the corresponding transition state <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and reactant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> conformers and the lowest energy conformers, respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>TS</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stand for the electronic energies of the lowest energy transition state and reactant conformers, respectively. All kinetics calculations are carried out using the KiSThelP 2021 and MESMER 6.0 programs (Glowacki et al., 2012; Canneaux et al., 2013).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>First generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation mechanisms of styrene</title>
      <p id="d2e1551">Styrene is composed of a benzene ring and a vinyl group, and its oxidation initiated by OH radicals may proceed either on the vinyl group or on the benzene ring. Previous literature has demonstrated that the addition of OH radicals to terminal carbon (C<sub><italic>β</italic></sub>-site) of a vinyl group in styrene is the dominant pathway, with the branching ratio of 88.2 % (Wu et al., 2021). Therefore, the C<sub><italic>β</italic></sub>-site OH-addition reaction is mainly considered in the present study. Figure 1 depicts that this reaction starts with the formation of a pre-reactive complex IM1, and then transforms into an alkyl radical S1-1 via transition state TS1 with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The rate coefficient of C<sub><italic>β</italic></sub>-site OH-addition reaction is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at ambient temperature, which is approximately consistent with the experimental (1.2–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and theoretical values (1.7–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the total rate coefficient of the reaction styrene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2024).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e1774">PES for the first-stage oxidation of styrene initiated by OH radicals and the isomerization reactions of S2-1-x at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e1783">Due to the existence of resonance structures with radical character on the aromatic ring, the resulting S1-1 can readily isomerize into three other species, namely, S1-2, S1-3 and S1-4. The attack of an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule on the C-center site of S1-1 leads to the formation of the first generation peroxy radicals S2-1-x (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">59.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The formed S2-1-x includes eight energetically similar conformers due to the different orientations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> attack. In order to distinguish the different conformers, the subscript letter x is used in the present study.  The energy ordering of different conformers follows an alphabetical sequence, in which letter a denotes the lowest energy conformer. The Boltzmann population of different conformers in S2-1-x is listed in Table S2 in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d2e1845">For the unimolecular decomposition reactions of S2-1-x, there are three kinds of pathways. One is the intramolecular H-shift reactions, where the hydrogen atom migrates from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups to the terminal oxygen atom of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group leading to various alkyl and alkoxyl radicals. Among these competing H-shift reactions, the hydrogen atom at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group can be transferred via a six-membered ring transition state (1,5-H shift) to yield an alkoxyl radical S3-1-a, which exhibits the lowest barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The resulting S3-1-a can undergo the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond cleavage to produce a formaldehyde and an alkyl radical S4-1-a (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by an OH radical release to form benzaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The rate coefficients for the aforementioned three pathways are calculated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Based on the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding rate coefficients, it can be concluded that the 1,5-H shift reaction is the rate-determining step in the formation of benzaldehyde. The other is the cyclization, where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group attacks the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> double bond in the benzene ring forming a cyclic peroxide alkyl radical S3-1-c (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The last is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-elimination, where a concerted process of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bonds scission forms a closed-shell species S3-1-b and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical byproduct (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The aforementioned results show that the cyclization and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-eliminaiton reactions are less importance due to their higher barriers.</p>
      <p id="d2e2253">As depicted in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, the formations of the first generation peroxy radicals S2-2-x from the association reaction S1-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are strongly endothermic (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that they have a significant potential to redissociate back to reactants S1-2 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting S2-2-x can undergo through various intramolecular H-shifts to yield distinct C-centered and O-centered radicals. Among these competing H-shift pathways, hydrogen transfer from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group to the terminal oxygen of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group has the lowest barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 17.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A similar conclusion is also obtained from the association reactions S1-3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S1-4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that the formations of the first generation peroxyl radicals S2-3-x and S2-4-x are thermochemically unfavorable, and their subsequent intramolecular H-shift barriers are considerably high (Figs. S2 and S3 in the Supplement). Therefore, in the present study, we mainly focus on the subsequent reaction mechanisms of S2-1-x under both low and high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e2501">In the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, the bimolecular reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals is expected to be the dominant sink for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals (Orlando and Tyndall, 2012; Vereecken et al., 2015). Previous studies have reported that the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  for the reactions of alkyl peroxyl radicals with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Atkinson and Arey, 2003; Boyd et al., 2003). The typical atmospheric concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals is 20–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pptv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2017; Bianchi et al., 2019), resulting in the pseudo-first-order rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] of 0.01–0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The isomerization reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals is competitive with the bimolecular reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals only when the rate coefficient of intramolecular H-shifts exceeds 0.01–0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, the bimolecular reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with NO is considered to be a dominant sink (Orlando and Tyndall, 2012; Vereecken et al., 2015). The rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the reaction of alkyl peroxyl radicals with NO is determined to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Atkinson and Arey, 2003; Bianchi et al., 2019). The typical atmospheric concentration of NO is 0.4–40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppbv</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2017; Bianchi et al., 2019), leading to the pseudo-first-order rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [NO] of 0.1–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The intramolecular H-shift reaction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals can compete with the bimolecular reaction with NO only when the rate coefficient of the former case exceeds 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, we use the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.01–0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.1–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values as thresholds to evaluate the relative importance of the isomerization reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals under both low- and high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. Previous studies have also employed the same methodology to evaluate the relative importance of isomerization and bimolecular reactions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals during the OH-initiated oxidation of organophosphate esters and alkylbenzenes (Wang et al., 2017; Fu et al., 2024). For the intramolecular H-shift reactions of S2-1-x, the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MC-TST</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is 2–4 orders of magnitude lower than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the isomerization reaction of S2-1-x is less competitive than the bimolecular reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and NO.</p>
      <p id="d2e3125">In the presence of NO, the bimolecular reactions of  with NO initially proceed via oxygen-to-oxygen coupling to yield organic nitrites ROONO, which subsequently decompose into benzaldehyde and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>H radical or isomerize to organic nitrates <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The energy barrier of the rate-limiting step predicted in Wang's study for the formation of benzaldehyde is 28.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is approximately 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> greater than that for the formation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2015). In the absence of NO, the hydroperoxides ROOH formed from the bimolecular reaction of S2-1-x with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals are anticipated to be the dominate products. The aforementioned results are further confirmed by the recent smog chamber experiment study that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> series products, as well as organic nitrates are the main components of SOA in the OH-initiated oxidation of styrene under different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions (Yu et al., 2022b). Considering that the extensive studies on the OH-initiated oxidation of benzaldehyde have done (Sebbar et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2022; Iuga et al., 2008), this study primarily focuses on the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation mechanisms of ROOH and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under both low- and high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Second generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation mechanisms of 1st-ROOH and 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e3306">The first generation products, including hydroperoxides 1st-ROOH and organic nitrates 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, include multiple conformers. To obtain the global minimum of 1st-ROOH and 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the conformer search is performed by using the Molclus program. The resulting structures are initially optimized at the M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level, then the single point energies are calculated at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd) level. The global minimum structures of 1st-ROOH (S4) and 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S5) are presented in Fig. S4 in the Supplement.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>3.2.1</label><title>The oxidation mechanism of 1st-ROOH initiated by OH radicals</title>
      <p id="d2e3349">The reaction 1st-ROOH (S4) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> proceeds through the addition of OH radicals to either side of the benzene ring to yield various alkyl radicals, as depicted in Fig. 2. In the present study, <italic>syn</italic>-OH-addition is defined as the scenario in which the addition of OH radicals occurs at the same side as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, while <italic>anti</italic>-OH-addition is referred to the scenario in which the addition of OH radicals occurs at the opposite side as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group. For the <italic>syn</italic>-OH-addition reactions, the addition of OH radicals to the C1-site of 1st-ROOH (S4) exhibits the lowest barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to the stability of the formed product, P<sub>S4-add1<sup>′</sup></sub>. A similar conclusion is also obtained from the <italic>anti</italic>-OH-addition reactions that the OH-addition pathway occurring at the C1-site is favorable (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Notably, the preferred OH-addition pathway in the <italic>anti</italic>-OH-addition reactions exhibits greater competitiveness compared to that in the <italic>syn</italic>-OH-addition reactions. It can be explained by the greater steric hindrance present in the latter reaction. In order to further evaluate the reliability of our results, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of all the <italic>syn</italic>-OH-addition and <italic>anti</italic>-OH-addition reactions are recalculated using the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ//M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p) method. As shown in Table S3 in the Supplement, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values obtained using the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd) method are in good agreement with those derived from the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ method. The largest deviation and the average absolute deviation are 1.2 and 0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, indicating that the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd) method employed in this study is reliable. Based on the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained using the DLPNO-CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ method, it can also be concluded that the addition of OH radicals to C1-site, occurring at the opposite direction relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, is energetically favorable. The rate coefficients of the addition of OH radicals to the different sites of 1st-ROOH are calculated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C1-site), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C2-site), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C3-site), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C4-site), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C5-site) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C6-site) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The branching ratios for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition to the C1, C5 and C6 sites are predicted to be 72.4 %, 23.8 % and 3.6 %, respectively, while the sum of branching ratios for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> addition to other carbon sites is less than 1 %.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e3721">PES for the oxidation of 1st-ROOH(S4) initiated by OH radicals at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e3730">Our result is opposite to Zhang's finding that the addition of OH radicals to C6-site would be the most favorable pathway (Zhang et al., 2024). The discrepancy can be explained by the following three factors: (1) The 1st-ROOH conformer selected in the Zhang's study is not the global minimum. In the present study, the global minimum conformer of 1st-ROOH, identified through the conformer search, is found to be 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lower than the 1st-ROOH structure selected in the Zhang's study. (2) The pre-reactive complexes are not considered in the Zhang's study. The addition of OH radicals to C1-, C2-, C3- and C6-sites, occurring at the opposite direction relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, are merely considered in the Zhang's study. They found that the apparent energy barrier of the addition of OH radicals to C6-site is smallest, and is therefore expected to be the favorable pathway. Actually, these OH-addition reactions are modulated by the pre-reactive complexes. It may be inappropriate to determine the favorable pathway based solely on apparent activation energy without considering the pre-reaction complexes. (3) From a geometric perspective, the addition of OH radicals to C6-site is associated with greater steric hindrance compared to other sites, as C6-atom connects with a larger functional group. Base on the aforementioned discussions, we believe that the addition of OH radicals to C6-site is unlikely to be the dominant pathway. Our calculations also confirm that the addition of OH radicals to C6-site is less importance compared to that at the C1-site.</p>
      <p id="d2e3761">Our conclusion is further supported by the reaction toluene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that the <italic>ortho</italic>-OH-addition reaction exhibits significant dominance, with the branching ratio of up to 69.8 %–75.8 % (Ji et al., 2017; Zhang, 2019; Wu et al., 2020). Considering the high reactivity of <italic>ortho</italic>-OH-addition in the reactions toluene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1st-ROOH (S4) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the substitute effects of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups are explicitly discussed in the present study. Notably, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group in toluene is bonded to the C6 atom, and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group in 1st-ROOH is bonded to the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> atom, as depicted in Fig. S5 in the Supplement. The optimized geometries of toluene and 1st-ROOH and the NPA atomic charges of all the carbon atoms in the benzene ring are displayed in Fig. S5. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond lengths and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond angles in the benzene ring of toluene are approximately 1.39 Å and 120°, respectively, which are consistent with those in the benzene ring of 1st-ROOH. The aforementioned results show the effect of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> groups on the geometric structure of benzene ring is negligible. From the perspective of NPA atomic charges, the charges on the C1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.246</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> e) and C5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.246</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> e) atoms are more greater than those on the other carbon atoms in the benzene ring of toluene. And the OH-adduct formed from the <italic>ortho</italic>-OH-addition reaction exhibits the greater stability. These results indicate that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group is a typical <italic>ortho</italic>-directing substituent and exerts an activating effect on the <italic>ortho</italic>-site of the benzene ring, which explains why the <italic>ortho</italic>-OH-addition reaction is predominant in the reaction toluene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Compared with the charges on the carbon atoms in the benzene ring of toluene, the charges on C1 and C6 atoms increase by 0.013 e and 0.057 e, respectively, in 1st-ROOH, which can be attributed to the electron-withdrawing effect of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group. The charge on the C1 atom (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.259</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> e) is the highest, and the stability of the resulting OH-adduct is the greatest, implying that the addition of OH radicals to C1-site is dominant in the reaction 1st-ROOH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, a direct comparison of the favorable OH-addition pathway in the reactions toluene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1st-ROOH (S4) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is performed in this study.</p>
      <p id="d2e4027">The formed product P<sub>S4-add1</sub> includes two conjugate double bonds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which can readily isomerize to P<sub>S4-add2</sub> and P<sub>S4-add3</sub>, as evident from Fig. S6 in the Supplement. In the present of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the attack of an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule on the C-centered site of P<sub>S4-add1</sub>, P<sub>S4-add2</sub>, and P<sub>S4-add3</sub> proceed via the barrierless processes to produce the second generation peroxy radicals P<sub>S4-add1</sub>-a/-s, P<sub>S4-add2</sub>-a/-s and P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a/-s. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition reaction occurring at the same direction as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group is defined as <italic>syn</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition, while the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition reaction occurring at the opposite direction as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group is defined as <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition. For the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a/-s</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower than that of <italic>syn</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition by 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition is preferable over <italic>syn</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition in energy. For the reactions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a/-s</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add3</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add3</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a/-s</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it can be concluded the same by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition reaction is energetically feasible.</p>
      <p id="d2e4469">The resulting P<sub>S4-add1</sub>-a/-s can proceed intramolecular cyclization reaction, where the attack of end-site oxygen atom of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group on C2-site of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> double bond, leading to the formation of peroxide bicyclic alkyl radicals. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a-1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 11.8 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, which are lower than those of the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-s</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-s-1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by 3.9 and 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The aforementioned results reveal that the intramolecular cyclization reaction of <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition product P<sub>S4-add1</sub>-a is favorable on both thermochemically and kinetically. A similar conclusion is also derived from the intramolecular cyclization reactions of <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition products P<sub>S4-add2</sub>-a and P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a. Notably, the barriers of the intramolecular cyclization reactions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a-1</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a</mml:mtext><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add2</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mtext>-a-2</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are extremely high, making them insignificant in the atmosphere. The tautomerization between P<sub>S4-add1</sub>-a-1 and P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-1 readily occurs due to the existence of resonance structures, and it is therefore that the latter conformer is selected as a prototype for the investigating of its subsequent reaction mechanism.</p>
      <p id="d2e4812">The formed P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-1 can combine with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule leading to the third generation peroxy radicals (also called as peroxide bicyclic peroxy radicals, BPR) P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-2, and the lowest energy conformer is presented in Fig. S7 in the Supplement. The isomerization of P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-2 may undergo through a concerted process of the cleavage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bridge bond and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond as well as hydrogen atom transfer from the hydroxyl group to the bridge oxygen atom, yielding a new peroxy radical (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The room temperature rate coefficient is calculated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is several orders of magnitude low than the typical pseudo-first-order rate constants <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.01–0.02 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.1–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), suggesting that the isomerization reaction is less importance in the atmosphere. Therefore, the bimolecular reactions of P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-2 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals with NO are mainly taken into consideration in this study.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e5050">PES for the unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-3 and its subsequent reactions at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e5069">In the pristine environments, P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-2 can react with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals resulting in the formation of the second generation products, bicyclic hydroperoxide 2nd-ROOH (S6) and peroxide bicyclic alkoxy radical (BAR) P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-3, as depicted in Fig. S7. For the subsequent reactions of S6 initiated by OH radicals, the detailed mechanisms are discussed in Sect. 3.3.1. From Fig. 3, it can be seen that the unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-3 involves two kinds of pathways. One is the ring-opening reaction, where the breakage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond produces an alkyl radical S7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The other is cyclization reaction, where the attack of oxygen atom of O-centered site on the C4-site of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> double bond generates the ring-retaining alkyl radical S15 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  The branching ratios for the formation of S7 and S15 are predicted to be 74.7 % and 25.3 %, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e5213">As shown in Fig. 3, S7 decomposes through the barrierless rupture of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bridge bond to form alkoxy radical S8-x, which includes five possible conformers as presented in Fig. S8 in the Supplement. The Boltzmann populations of different conformers are listed in Table S4 in the Supplement. S8-x can undergo various intramolecular H-shifts, in which a hydrogen atom is transferred from different carbon atoms to O-centered site, forming the alkyl radicals. Among the competing H-shift reactions, 1,5 H-shift occurring at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group exhibits the smallest barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MC-TST</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at ambient temperature (Table S5 in the Supplement). The formed S8-c-P can readily isomerize to S9 due to its resonance stabilized structure. The unimolecular decomposition of S9 can proceed through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond scission to produce a ketene-enol S10 and an alkyl radical S10-1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leading to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical and a 1,2-dicarbonyl compound S10-2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Alternatively, S9 may undergo via the elimination of CO to generate an alkyl radicals S11 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The aforementioned results show that the formation of S10 and S10-1 is energetically favorable, with the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S10</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 26.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d2e5497">In the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the attack of an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule on the C-centered sites of S9 leads to the fourth generation peroxyl radical S12-x (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Adopting the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the reactions of alkyl radicals with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Ma et al., 2021), the pseudo-first-order rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>] is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The unimolecular decomposition of alkyl radicals is competitive only when their decay rate exceeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is about six orders of magnitude greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S10</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the unimolecular decomposition of S9 is less importance. As shown in Fig. S9 in the Supplement, S12-x can proceed various intramolecular H-shift reactions, where hydrogen atom migrates from the different carbon sites or hydroxyl groups to the terminal oxygen atom of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, resulting in the formation of QOOH radicals and alkoxyl radicals. Among these competing H-shift reactions, the 1,7-H transfer at the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-site leading to the formation of S12-d-P exhibits the smallest barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Then, it decomposes to yield an OH radical and a closed-shell product S13 containing a hydroperoxide, three hydroxyl and three carbonyl groups (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e5908">S8-x can proceed through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond scission to yield an unsaturated 1,4-dicarbonyl species S14 and an alkyl radical S10-1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with the rate coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Notably, both the 1,5 aldehyde H-shift and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond scission reactions yield a closed-shell species S10-2 with up to five oxygen atoms, and the branching ratios are predicted to be 28.1 % and 71.9 %, respectively. The result is further supported by the previous study that the proportion of aldehyde H-shift products constitutes about one third of the total products in the reaction benzene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Wang et al., 2020b).</p>
      <p id="d2e6023">As shown in Fig. 3, S15 can further react with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> leading to the fourth generation peroxy radical S16-x, which can proceed either intramolecular H-shifts forming QOOH radicals (Fig. S10 in the Supplement), or reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and NO forming alkoxyl radical S17. Notably, the barriers of intramolecular H-shifts are extremely high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), making them less importance in the atmosphere.  The transformation of S17 undergoes through the breakage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond to produce an alkyl radical S18 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by fragmentation into an alkoxyl radical S19 via the barrierless rupture of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bridge bond. Then, S19 dissociates to an OH radical, a glycolaldehyde S25 and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-epoxide product S23 bearing a hydroxy and three carbonyl groups, being the dominant pathway. The regeneration of OH radicals drives the successive autoxidation of styrene, eventually leading to the production of multifunctional products.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>3.2.2</label><title>The oxidation mechanism of 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> initiated by OH radicals</title>
      <p id="d2e6182">The OH-initiated oxidation of 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S5) proceeds through the addition of OH radicals to different carbon sites in the benzene ring to form various alkyl radicals P<sub>S5-addx</sub>, as depicted in Fig. 4. Among the competing OH-addition reactions, the OH-addition reaction at the C1-site, which proceeds on the opposite direction as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, has the smallest barrier (R<sub>S5-add1</sub>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to the stability of the formed product P<sub>S5-add1</sub>. The result again shows that the <italic>ortho</italic>-addition reaction is energetically feasible. P<sub>S5-add1</sub> may isomerize to two other resonance structures, namely, P<sub>S5-add2</sub> and P<sub>S5-add3</sub>. For the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S5-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> may add on either the opposite (<italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition) or the same direction (<italic>syn</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition) relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, leading to the second generation peroxyl radicals P<sub>S5-add1</sub>-a and P<sub>S5-add1</sub>-s (Fig. S11 in the Supplement). The exoergicity of these two reactions are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, suggesting that the <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition reaction is thermochemically favorable. Next, they can isomerize via a cyclization process to yield P<sub>S5-add1</sub>-a-1 and P<sub>S5-add1</sub>-s-1 with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 13.3 and 18.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This result shows that the cyclization reaction of <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition product P<sub>S5-add1</sub>-a is kinetically feasible. A similar conclusion is also obtained from the reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S5-add3</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that the formation of <italic>anti</italic>-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition product P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-1 is dominant. Due to the existence of the conjugate double bond, it facilitates the tautomerization between P<sub>S5-add1</sub>-a-1 and P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-1. Therefore, we mainly focus on the subsequent chemistry of P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-1 in the present study.</p>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e6588">PES for the oxidation of 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(S5) initiated by OH radicals at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6608">P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-1 can further react with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule leading to the third generation peroxyl radicals P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-2, which include multiple conformers. The lowest energy conformer resulting from conformer search is presented in Fig. S12 in the Supplement. In urban environments, the bimolecular reaction of P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-2 with NO yields the second generation products, a bicyclic organic nitrate 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S26) and a BAR P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3, as displayed in Fig. S12. The detailed mechanism of OH-initiated oxidation of S26 is discussed in Sect. 3.3.2. As shown in Fig. 5, P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3 can either proceed via a ring opening process to form an alkyl radical S27 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), or undergo through a cyclization process to generate an epoxide species S35 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The branching ratios of these two reactions are predicted to be 69.2 % and 30.8 %, respectively. Notably, the branching ratio of cyclization reaction of P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3 increases by 5.5 % compared to that of cyclization reaction of P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-3, suggesting that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> substitution is beneficial to cyclization reaction.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e6782">PES for the unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3 and its subsequent reactions at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e6800">The degradation of S27 proceeds through the barrierless scission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bridge bond to form S28-x, and the Boltzmann populations of different conformers are listed in Table S6 in the Supplement. S28-x can undergo via various intramolecular H-shifts to produce QOOH radicals, in which hydrogen atom transfer from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group to the terminal oxygen atom of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group forming S28-e-P has the smallest barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. S13 in the Supplement). S28-e-P can readily isomerize to S29, which includes two distinct decomposition pathways. One is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond cleavage, yielding a ketene-enol S30 and an alkyl radical S30-1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to form a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radical and a 1,2-dicarbonyl species S30-2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The other is the elimination of CO to generate an alkyl radical S31 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), but the barrier is considerably high, making this pathway less competitive. The rate coefficient for the formation of S30 and S30-1 is calculated to be 14.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is about six orders of magnitude lower than the pseudo-first-order rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the unimolecular decomposition of S29 is insignificant.</p>
      <p id="d2e7060">In the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the bimolecular reaction of S29 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> produces the fourth generation peroxyl radicals S32-x, comprising five energetically similar conformers as shown in Fig. S14 in the Supplement. For the 1,7-H transfer reaction, hydrogen atom at the C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-site can be transferred through an eight-membered ring transition state to generate an alkyl radical S32-d-P (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed by the elimination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> forming a closed product S33 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  S33 and S13 are isomeric species, with the former exhibiting more stability than the latter. S28-x can proceed through the cleavage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond to generate an unsaturated 1,4-dicarbonyl compound S34 and an alkyl radical S30-1. The rare coefficients of the 1,5 aldehyde H-shift and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond scission reactions are predicted to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table S7 in the Supplement), respectively, with the branching ratios of 23 % and 77 %. S30-1, formed from the above mentioned two pathways, may undergo through H-abstraction by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to yield an organic nitrate S30-2 bearing a hydroxyl and two carbonyl groups (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e7298">S35 can combine with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule forming the fourth generation peroxyl radicals S36-x, which have five possible conformers as shown in Fig. S15 in the Supplement. S36-x can proceed either intramolecular H-shifts forming QOOH radicals, or reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and NO generating alkoxyl radical S37. However, the barriers of intramolecular H-shifts are extremely high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">31.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), making them less importance in the atmosphere. The degradation of S37 initially proceeds via the breakage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond to form S38 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> followed by decomposition into an alkoxyl radical S39 via the barrierless scission of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bridge bond. The dominant pathway of the unimolecular decomposition of S39 is the formation of a glyoxal and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-epoxide species S40-1 bearing a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a hydroxyl and two carbonyl groups. This process differs from the unimolecular decay of S19, where the favorable pathways is the formation of a tricarbonyl compound S23.  The aforementioned results reveal that the preferable pathway is strongly dependent on the breakage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond associated with the property of substituents in the decomposition of alkoxy radicals.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Third generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation mechanisms of 2nd-ROOH and 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d2e7492">The second generation products, bicyclic hydroperoxide 2nd-ROOH and bicyclic organic nitrate 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, have multiple possible conformers. The global minimum structures of 2nd-ROOH (S6) and 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S26) resulting from the conformer search are presented in Figs. S7 and S12, respectively.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>3.3.1</label><title>The oxidation mechanism of 2nd-ROOH initiated by OH radicals</title>
      <p id="d2e7524">OH-initiated oxidation of 2nd-ROOH (S6) can either undergo through the addition of OH radicals to either side of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> double bond to generate the alkyl radicals, or proceed via H-abstraction from the different carbon sites to produce the alkyl radicals and alkoxyl radicals, as shown in Figs. S16 and S17 in the Supplement. For the OH-addition reactions, <italic>syn</italic>-OH-addition is defined as the addition of OH radicals on the same side as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, while <italic>anti</italic>-OH-addition is referred to the addition of OH radicals on the opposite side as the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group. The addition of OH radicals to the C3-site of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> double bond forming the product P<sub>S6-abs3</sub> has the smallest barrier (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the exoergicity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the H-abstraction reactions, the abstraction of hydrogen atom at the C5-site is the most favorable pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the exoergicity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It is mainly because that the presence of an allyl group enhances the stability of the resulting product P<sub>S6-abs5</sub>. Notably, the abstraction of hydrogen atom at the C2-site proceeds through a concerted process of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bridge bond rupture, leading to the formation of an alkoxyl radical P<sub>S6-abs2</sub> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This reaction is expected to be less importance due to its higher energy barrier. The rate coefficient of the favorable OH-addition reaction is calculated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is about one order of magnitude greater than that of the preferable H-abstraction reaction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">molec</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Based on the above discussion, it can be concluded that OH-addition reaction is favorable on both thermochemically and kinetically. This conclusion is further supported by the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> alkene reaction systems that OH-addition pathways are predominant (Chen et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2017; Arathala and Musah, 2024).</p>
      <p id="d2e7922">As depicted in Fig. S18 in the Supplement, the unimolecular decay of the product P<sub>S6-add3</sub> resulting from the favorable OH-addition reaction proceeds through a cyclization process to yield an epoxide compound S41 and an OH radical byproduct with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 15.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R41</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or undergoes via intramolecular 1,4 H-shift to form a peroxy radical S42 with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 21.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R43</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, or proceeds via the elimination of hydrogen atom to produce an alkene S43 with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 37.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding rate coefficients, the dominant pathway of the unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S6-add3</sub> is the formation of S41. In the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the pseudo-first-order rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the reactions of alkyl radicals with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is about five orders of magnitude greater than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R41</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, suggesting that the unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S6-add3</sub> is insignificant.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e8208">PES for the subsequent reactions of P<sub>S6-add3</sub> in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e8238">As shown in Fig. 6, the fourth generation peroxy radicals S44-x formed in the addition reaction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S6-add3</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can either proceed via intramolecular H-shits to form QOOH, or undergo through self- or cross-reactions to yield an alkoxy radical S45. Due to the considerably high barriers of intramolecular H-shifts, they are deemed to be negligible under atmospheric conditions. S45 can convert into an alkyl radical S46 through the cleavage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond, or dissociate to an alkyl radical S50 via the rupture of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond. The barrier of the former reaction is 3.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is lower than that of the latter pathway by 2.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the formation of S46 is kinetically preferable.  Then, S46 decomposes into an OH radical byproduct and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-product S47 bearing a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a peroxide bridge, two carbonyls, and three hydroxy groups, which is expected to be the dominant pathway owing to its lower barrier. The rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RS47</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is about two orders of magnitude greater than the pseudo-first-order rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The result reveals that the unimolecular decomposition of S46 is more competitive than the bimolecular reaction with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The formed OH radicals can once again participate in the oxidations of styrene and its multifunctional products, continuing these processes until they are completely consumed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>3.3.2</label><title>The oxidation mechanism of 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> initiated by OH radicals</title>
      <p id="d2e8474">OH-initiated oxidation of 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S26) includes four different OH-addition pathways and five different H-abstraction pathways, as displayed in Figs. S19 and S20 in the Supplement. For the OH-addition reactions, the attack of OH radicals on the C3-site of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> double bond forming the product P<sub>S26-add3</sub>, occurring on the same direction relative to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group, is found to be the favorable pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For the H-abstraction reactions, the abstraction of hydrogen atom at the C5-site is identified as the preferable pathway (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to the enhanced stability of the resulting product P<sub>S26-add5</sub> by the presence of an allyl group. By comparing the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the favorable OH-addition and H-abstraction pathways, it can concluded that the former case is dominant on both thermochemically and kinetically. This conclusion is consistent with the result from the reaction 2nd-ROOH (S6) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that OH-addition is more competitive than H-abstraction.</p>
      <p id="d2e8717">The product P<sub>S26-add3</sub> arising from the favorable OH-addition pathway has three potential unimolecular decay pathways, as depicted in Fig. S21 in the Supplement: (1) P<sub>S26-add3</sub> dissociates to an epoxide S52 and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule through a cyclization process with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 18.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R52</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; (2) P<sub>S26-add3</sub> isomerizes to an alkyl radical S53 via the intramolecular 1,2 H-shift (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); (3) P<sub>S26-add3</sub> converts into an alkene S54 via the elimination of hydrogen atom (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">39.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).  Based on the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the corresponding rate coefficient, the dominant pathway of the unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S26-add3</sub> is the formation of S52. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>R52</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is about seven orders of magnitude lower than the pseudo-first-order rate constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, indicating that the unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S26-add3</sub> is less importance.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e8958">PES for the subsequent reactions of P<sub>S26-add3</sub> in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at the M06-2X/6-311++G(3df,3pd)//M06-2X/6-31+g(d,p) level.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/26/4823/2026/acp-26-4823-2026-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e8988">In the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, P<sub>S26-add3</sub> can react with an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecule leading to the formation of the fourth generation peroxy radicals S55-x, comprising seven possible conformers as shown in Fig. 7. For the intramolecular H-shifts of S55-x, not all of reactants (S55-c, S55-d and S55-e) have the suitable conformers that allow for the pathways across the reaction barriers. The barriers of intramolecular H-shifts are considerably high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), making them uncompetitive in the atmosphere. Alternatively, S55-x can react with other <inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals forming an alkoxyl radical S56, followed by decomposition into an alkyl radical S57 via the breakage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), or fragmentation into an alkyl radical S61 through the cleavage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The aforementioned results reveal that the formation of S57 is energetically favorable, which is consistent with the conclusion derived from the unimolecular decomposition of S45 that the breakage of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond is feasible. Next, S57 dissociates to a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> coproduct and a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-product S58 that possessed a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a peroxide bridge, two carbonyls, and three hydroxy groups. This pathway is expected to be the dominant one (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kcal</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with the rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>RS58</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can further participate in the cycling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, ultimately generating tropospheric ozone and SOA.</p>
      <p id="d2e9323">The overall reaction mechanism and the fractional yields of the major products in the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene under different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions are presented in Figs. S22 and S23 in the Supplement. In the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, the fractional yield of the first generation closed-shell product 1st-ROOH (S4) formed from the reaction S2-1-x <inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is predicted to be 71.6 %. For the second generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, the reaction of the peroxyl radical P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-2 with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals produces the second generation closed-shell product 2nd-ROOH (S6) and an alkoxyl radical P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-3, with the fractional yields of 41.4 % and 10.4 %, respectively. The formed P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-2 can either proceed through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond scission to produce an alkyl radical S7 with the fractional yield of 7.8 %, or undergo via a cyclization process to generate an alkyl radical S15 with the fractional yield of 2.6 %. S7 and S15 can be transformed via a series of reactions, ultimately leading to the formation of second generation closed-shell product S10-2, S13 and S23, with the fractional yields of 5.6 %, 2.2 % and 1.3 %, respectively. For the third generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, the degradation of 2nd-ROOH (S6) ultimately yields the third generation closed-shell products S47 and S51, with the fractional yields of 26.3 % and 0.3 %, respectively. As a result, the major closed-shell products are 1st-ROOH (S4), 2nd-ROOH (S6), S10-2, S13 and S47 in the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene in the low-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e9477">In the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions, the fractional yield of the first generation closed-shell product 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S5) formed from the reaction S2-1-x <inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> NO is predicted to be 26.5 %, as shown in Fig. S23.  As the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation reactions proceed, 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S5) can be initially transformed into the peroxyl radical P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-2, followed by reaction with NO to form the second generation closed-shell product 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S26) and an alkoxyl radical P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3, with the fractional yields of 4.8 % and 11.2 %, respectively. The decomposition of P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3 undergoes via two distinct pathways. One is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond cleavage, leading to an alkyl radical S27 with the fractional yield of 7.8 %. The other is the cyclization, resulting in an alkyl radical S35 with the fractional yield of 3.4 %. The resulting S27 and S35 undergo multiple oxidation steps, finally leading to the formation of the second generation closed-shell products S30-2, S33 and S40-1, with the fractional yields of 6.0 %, 1.8 %, and 1.7 %, respectively.  2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S26) can be further oxidized to yield the third generation closed-shell products S58 and S62, with the fractional yields of 2.6 % and 0.03 %, respectively. In summary, the major closed-shell products are 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S5), 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S26), S30-2 and S58 in the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene in the high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Volatility classes</title>
      <p id="d2e9651">The volatility classes for various organic compounds are based on their saturation concentration, as proposed by Donahue et al. (2012). The saturated vapour pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and saturated concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of styrene and its multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation products are predicted by using the SIMPOL.1 method (Pankow et al., 2008). As show in Table S8 in the Supplement, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the first generation closed-shell product benzaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O) are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.62</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, which are 3–4 orders of magnitude greater than those of S4 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M657" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Based on the values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, benzaldehyde is classified as the volatile organic compounds (VOCs), whereas S4 and S5 are classified as the intermediate volatility organic compounds (IVOCs). These first generation closed-shell products exist exclusively in the gas phase under atmospheric conditions (Bianchi et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d2e9982">For the second generation closed-shell products, S6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S26 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) formed from the bimolecular reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and NO are classified as the low volatility organic compounds (LVOCs). Similarly, S13 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S33 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.97</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), formed through the ring-opening and subsequent intramolecular H-shift reactions of P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-3 and P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3, respectively, are also classified as LVOCs, which can condense onto the existing large particles (Bianchi et al., 2019). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of the remaining closed-shell products are significantly greater than those of the aforementioned four products, for example, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of S20 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S40-1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), formed by the cyclization and decomposition reactions of P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-3 and P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-3, are 42.21 and 75.86 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, classifying them as the semivolatile organic compounds (SVOC).</p>
      <p id="d2e10363">For the third generation closed-shell products, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of S47 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S51 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), formed through the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition and subsequent decomposition reactions of P<sub>S6-add3</sub>, are about two orders of magnitude lower than those of the second generation closed-shell products S6 and S13, despite being classified as LVOCs. Similarly, S58 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S62 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ug</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), formed via the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition and subsequent decomposition reactions of P<sub>S26-add3</sub>, exhibit lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values compared to the second generation closed-shell products S26 and S33. The aforementioned results reveal that the volatility of the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation products significantly decreases with increasing the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation steps. As the oxidation reactions of the third generation closed-shell products proceed further, the formed products may possess sufficiently low volatility to participate in the formation and growth of new aerosol particle.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions and atmospheric implications</title>
      <p id="d2e10717">The results reveal that the first generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals, formed from the addition of OH radicals to the C<sub><italic>β</italic></sub>-site of a vinyl group in styrene followed by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition, can proceed intramolecular H-shifts to generate various alkyl and alkoxyl radicals. The rate coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MC-TST</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Among the competing H-shift pathways, the hydrogen atom transfer from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group to the terminal oxygen atom of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group has the lowest barrier. The resulting alkoxy radical can further decompose into benzaldehyde through the successive elimination of HCHO and an OH radical. The 1,5-H shift reaction occurring at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> group is the rate-determining step in the formation of benzaldehyde. Alternatively, the first generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals can proceed bimolecular reactions with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and NO, leading to the formation of the first generation closed-shell C7- and C8-products 1st-ROOH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), benzaldehyde (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O), and 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d2e10917">For the second generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, OH-addition reaction occurring at the <italic>ortho</italic>-site of 1st-ROOH and 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a significant dominance. This is consistent with the analogous reaction systems, toluene <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and phenol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, in which <italic>ortho</italic>-OH-addition reaction is energetically favorable (Wu et al., 2020; Xu and Wang, 2013). The resulting alkyl radicals may undergo two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-addition steps and a cyclization process to form BPR, which can react with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals and NO to yield the corresponding BAR, and the second generation closed-shell C8-product 2nd-ROOH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with the fractional yields of 41.4 % and 4.8 %. The unimolecular decomposition of BAR formed in the reaction 1st-ROOH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> includes two distinct pathways: (1) ring-opening and followed by decomposition, yielding the multifunctional products S10-2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S13 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the fractional yields of 5.6 % and 2.2 %, respectively; or (2) cyclization and followed by dissociation, generating the closed-shell C6-product S23 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the fractional yield of 1.3 %. The major products formed from the unimolecular decomposition of BAR in the reaction 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the multifunctional products S30-2 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), S33 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and S40-1 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), with the fractional yields of 6.0 %, 1.8 % and 1.7 %, respectively.</p>
      <p id="d2e11209">For the third generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation, the addition of OH radicals to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bond in 2nd-ROOH and 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dominant pathway. The resulting alkyl radicals can proceed a series of reactions to produce the alkoxyl radicals, which subsequently decompose into an OH radical byproduct and a closed-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-product S47 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), identified as the favorable pathway in the reaction 2nd-ROOH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. S47 contains a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OOH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a peroxide bridge, two carbonyls, and three hydroxy groups. The major product formed in the reaction 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a closed-shell <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-product S58 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which contain a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a peroxide bridge, two carbonyls, and three hydroxy groups. The fractional yields of S47 and S58 are 26.3 % and 2.6 %, respectively. The volatility of the oxidation products significantly decreases with increasing the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation steps in the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene.</p>
      <p id="d2e11385">In the laboratory chamber experiments, the structures of some specific oxidation products remain uncharacterized but are merely inferred from the exact mass and fragmentation data. Using high-level quantum chemistry methods, we identify the molecular structures of multifunctional products and elucidate their formation pathways in the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene. The mechanistic insights derived from this work are broadly applicable to the photooxidation of structurally analogous aromatics. Furthermore, we quantify the yields of multifunctional products and demonstrate that their volatility decreases significantly with increasing the number of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation steps. The resulting multifunctional products may undergo a series of oxidation reactions to form low volatility compounds, thereby contributing to the formation and growth of new aerosol particle. In the future, more detailed experimental and theoretical studies need to be conducted to identify the molecular structures and formation pathways of multifunctional products formed through the photooxidation of other aromatics under both low and high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. These studies will facilitate a more accurate characterization of the chemical composition and formation yields of aromatic SOA, and thereby help narrow the gap between the measured and modeled SOA concentrations in urban environments.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e11424">Datasets are accessible by contacting the corresponding author, Yu Huang, (huangyu@ieecas.cn).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e11427">Tables S1 and S3 list the energy barriers of all the elementary reactions involved in the addition of OH radicals to styrene and 1st-ROOH (S4) predicted at different levels. Tables S2, S4 and S6 list the relative electronic energy, free energy and Boltzmann population of different conformers involved in S2-1-x, S8-x and S28-x. Tables S5 and S7 list the MC-TST rate coefficients for the intramolecular H-shift reactions of S8-x and S28-x. Table S8 summaries the saturated vapour pressure and saturated concentrations of styrene and its multiple generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation closed-shell products. Figures S1–S3 display the PESs for the unimolecular reactions of S2-2-x, S2-3-x and S2-4-x. Figure S4 shows the global minimum structures of 1st-ROOH(S4) and 1st-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(S5). Figure S5 depicts the geometric parameters of toluene and 1st-ROOH (S4) and the NPA atomic charges of all the carbon atoms. Figures S6 and S11 show the PESs for the addition reactions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S4-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>S5-add1</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figures S7 and S12 present the lowest energy conformers of third generation peroxy radicals P<sub>S4-add3</sub>-a-2 and P<sub>S5-add3</sub>-a-2. Figures S8–S10 depict the PESs for the intramolecular hydrogen transfer reactions of S8-x, S12-x and S16-x. Figures S13–S15 depict the PESs for the intramolecular hydrogen transfer reactions of S28-x, S32-x and S36-x. Figures S16–18 show the PESs for the OH-initiated oxidation of 2nd-ROOH (S6) and unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S6-add3</sub>. Figures S19–S21 show the PESs for the OH-initiated oxidation of 2nd-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RONO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (S26) and unimolecular decomposition of P<sub>S26-add3</sub>. Figures S22 and S23 show the overall reaction mechanism of the multi-generation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi class="Radical" mathvariant="normal">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> oxidation of styrene in the low- and high-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> conditions. The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4823-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-4823-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e11564">LC and YH conceptualized the study. LC conducted quantum chemical calculation. YX and ZJ analyzed the data. LC conducted the volatility estimation. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e11570">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e11576">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e11582">This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 42175134) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (grant no. 2022415).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e11588">This paper was edited by Arthur Chan and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Alecu, I. M., Zheng, J., Zhao, Y., and Truhlar, D. G.: Computational thermochemistry: scale factor databases and scale factors for vibrational frequencies obtained from electronic model chemistries, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 6, 2872–2887, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100326h" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ct100326h</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Arathala, P. and Musah, R. A.: Atmospheric chemistry of chloroprene initiated by OH radicals: combined Ab initio/DFT calculations and kinetics analysis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 128, 8983–8995,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c05428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.4c05428</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr0206420</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bianchi, F., Kurtén, T., Riva, M., Mohr, C., Rissanen, M. P., Roldin, P., Berndt, T., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J., Junninen, H., Jokinen, T., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Thornton, J. A., Donahue, N., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Ehn, M.: Highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOM) from gas-phase autoxidation involving peroxy radicals: a key contributor to atmospheric aerosol, Chem. Rev., 119, 3472–3509, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Bloss, C., Wagner, V., Jenkin, M. E., Volkamer, R., Bloss, W. J., Lee, J. D., Heard, D. E., Wirtz, K., Martin-Reviejo, M., Rea, G., Wenger, J. C., and Pilling, M. J.: Development of a detailed chemical mechanism (MCMv3.1) for the atmospheric oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 641–664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-641-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-641-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Boyd, A. A., Flaud, P. M., Daugey, N., and Lesclaux, R.: Rate constants for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reactions measured under a large excess of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 818–821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026581r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp026581r</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Cabrera-Perez, D., Taraborrelli, D., Sander, R., and Pozzer, A.: Global atmospheric budget of simple monocyclic aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6931–6947, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6931-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-6931-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Canneaux, S., Bohr, F., and Henon, E.: KiSThelP: a program to predict thermodynamic properties and rate constants from quantum chemistry results, J. Comput. Chem., 35, 82–93,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jcc.23470</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chen, L., Huang, Y., Xue, Y., Jia, Z., and Wang, W.: Atmospheric oxidation of 1-butene initiated by OH radical: Implications for ozone and nitrous acid formations, Atmos. Environ., 244, 118010–118021,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118010</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Cho, J., Roueintan, M., and Li, Z.: Kinetic and dynamic investigations of OH reaction with styrene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 9460–9470,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp501380j" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp501380j</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Eckart, C.: The penetration of a potential barrier by electrons, Phys. Rev., 35, 1303–1309,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.35.1303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRev.35.1303</ext-link>, 1930.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Clean Air Act: Title I-Air Pollution Prevention and Control. U.S., ISBN: 978-0314835024,  1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Fernández-Ramos, A., Ellingson, B. A., Meana-Pañeda, R., Marques, J. M. C., and Truhlar, D. G.: Symmetry numbers and chemical reaction rates, Theor. Chem. Acc., 118, 813–826, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0328-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00214-007-0328-0</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Forstner, H. J. L., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol from the photooxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons: molecular composition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1345–1358,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es9605376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es9605376</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Li, X., Caricato, M., Marenich, A. V., Bloino, J., Janesko, B. G., Gomperts, R., Mennucci, B., Hratchian, H. P., Ortiz, J. V., Izmaylov, A. F., Sonnenberg, J. L., Williams-Young, D., Ding, F., Lipparini, F., Egidi, F., Goings, J., Peng, B., Petrone, A., Henderson, T., Ranasinghe, D., Zakrzewski, V. G., Gao, J., Rega, N., Zheng, G., Liang, W., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Throssell, K., Montgomery, J. A., Peralta, J. J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M. J., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E. N., Kudin, K. N., Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T. A., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A. P., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Adamo, C., Cammi, R., Ochterski, J. W., Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B., and Fox, D. J.: Gaussian 16, Revision B.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, <uri>https://www.gaussian.com</uri> (last access: 20 June 2025),  2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fu, Z., Xie, H. B., Elm, J., Guo, X., Fu, Z., and Chen, J.: Formation of low-volatile products and unexpected high formaldehyde yield from the atmospheric oxidation of methylsiloxanes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7136–7145,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01090" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c01090</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Fu, Z., Ma, F., Liu, Y., Yan, C., Huang, D., Chen, J., Elm, J., Li, Y., Ding, A., Pichelstorfer, L., Xie, H. B., Nie, W., Francisco, J. S., and Zhou, P.: An overlooked oxidation mechanism of toluene: computational predictions and experimental validations, Chem. Sci., 14, 13050–13059,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC03638C" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D3SC03638C</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Fu, Z., Guo, S., Xie, H. B., Zhou, P., Boy, M., Yao, M., and Hu, M.: A near-explicit reaction mechanism of chlorine-initiated limonene: implications for health risks associated with the concurrent use of cleaning agents and disinfectants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 19762–19773,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04388" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.4c04388</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Fukui, K.: The path of chemical reactions – the IRC approach, Accounts Chem. Res., 14, 363–368,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ar00072a001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ar00072a001</ext-link>, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Garmash, O., Rissanen, M. P., Pullinen, I., Schmitt, S., Kausiala, O., Tillmann, R., Zhao, D., Percival, C., Bannan, T. J., Priestley, M., Hallquist, Å. M., Kleist, E., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Hallquist, M., Berndt, T., McFiggans, G., Wildt, J., Mentel, T. F., and Ehn, M.: Multi-generation OH oxidation as a source for highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 515–537, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-515-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-515-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Gilbert, R. G. and Smith, S. C.: Theory of unimolecular and recombination reactions, Blackwell Scientific, Carlton, Australia,  ISBN: 978-0632027491, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Glowacki, D. R., Liang, C. H., Morley, C., Pilling, M. J., and Robertson, S. H.: MESMER: an open-source master equation solver for multi-energy well reactions, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 9545–9560,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3051033" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp3051033</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Holbrook, K. A., Pilling, M. J., Robertson, S. H., and Robinson, P. J.: Unimolecular reactions, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York, ISBN: 978-0471922681,  1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Huang, Y., Su, T., Wang, L., Wang, N., Xue, Y., Dai, W., Lee, S. C., Cao, J., and Ho, S. S. H.: Evaluation and characterization of volatile air toxics indoors in a heavy polluted city of northwestern China in wintertime, Sci. Total Environ., 662, 470–480,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.250</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Iuga, C., Galano, A., and Vivier-Bunge, A.: Theoretical investigation of the OH-initiated oxidation of benzaldehyde in the troposphere, Chem. Phys. Chem., 9, 1453–1459,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800144" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cphc.200800144</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Iyer, S., Kumar, A., Savolainen, A., Barua, S., Daub, C., Pichelstorfer, L., Roldin, P., Garmash, O., Seal, P., Kurtén, T., and Rissanen, M.: Molecular rearrangement of bicyclic peroxy radicals is a key route to aerosol from aromatics, Nat. Commun., 14, 4984–4991, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40675-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41467-023-40675-2</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Ji, Y., Zhao, J., Terazono, H., Misawa, K., Levitt, N. P., Li, Y., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Wang, Y., Duan, L., Pan, B., Zhang, F., Feng, X., An, T., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Zhang, A. L., Shibuya, K., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Reassessing the atmospheric oxidation mechanism of toluene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8169–8174,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705463114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1705463114</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation> Koppmann, R.: Volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere, John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN: 978-1405131155,  2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Li, M., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Tong, D., Lei, Y., Liu, F., Hong, C., Kang, S., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Bo, Y., Su, H., Cheng, Y., and He, K.: Persistent growth of anthropogenic non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions in China during 1990–2017: drivers, speciation and ozone formation potential, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8897–8913, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Lu, T.: Molclus program, Version 1.9.3., <uri>http://www.keinsci.com/research/molclus.html</uri> (last access: 21 May 2024), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Ma, F., Guo, X., Xia, D., Xie, H. B., Wang, Y., Elm, J., Chen, J., and Niu, J.: Atmospheric chemistry of allylic radicals from isoprene: a successive cyclization-driven autoxidation mechanism, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 4399–4409,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07925" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c07925</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Møller, K. H., Otkjær, R. V., Hyttinen, N., Kurtén, T., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: Cost-effective implementation of multiconformer transition state theory for peroxy radical hydrogen shift reactions, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 10072–10087, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09370" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09370</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Møller, K. H., Berndt, T., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: Atmospheric autoxidation of amines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11087–11099, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03937" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c03937</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Molteni, U., Bianchi, F., Klein, F., El Haddad, I., Frege, C., Rossi, M. J., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1909–1921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Neese, F.: Software update: the ORCA program system – version 6.0, Wires Comput. Mol. Sci., 15, e70019,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/wcms.70019</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Nie, W., Yan, C., Huang, D. D., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Qiao, X., Guo, Y., Tian, L., Zheng, P., Xu, Z., Li, Y., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Sun, P., Wang, J., Zheng, F., Li, X., Yin, R., Dallenbach, K. R., Bianchi, F., Petäjä, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, M., Schervish, M., Wang, S., Qiao, L., Wang, Q., Zhou, M., Wang, H., Yu, C., Yao, D., Guo, H., Ye, P., Lee, S., Li, Y. J., Liu, Y., Chi, X., Kerminen, V. M., Ehn, M., Donahue, N. M., Wang, T., Huang, C., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D, Jiang, J., and Ding, A.: Secondary organic aerosol formed by condensing anthropogenic vapours over China's megacities, Nat. Geosci., 15, 255–261, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00922-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41561-022-00922-5</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Orlando, J. J. and Tyndall, G. S.: Laboratory studies of organic peroxy radical chemistry: an overview with emphasis on recent issues of atmospheric significance, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6294–6317,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35166H" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C2CS35166H</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPO L.1: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Pasik, D., Frandsen, B. N., Meder, M., Iyer, S., Kurtén, T., and Myllys, N.: Gas-phase oxidation of atmospherically relevant unsaturated hydrocarbons by acyl peroxy radicals, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 146, 13427–13437, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c02523" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jacs.4c02523</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Sebbar, N., Bozzelli, J. W., and Bockhorn, H.: Thermochemistry and reaction paths in the oxidation reaction of benzoyl radical: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal" class="Radical">⚫</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 11897–11914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2078067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp2078067</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Shen, H., Vereecken, L., Kang, S., Pullinen, I., Fuchs, H., Zhao, D., and Mentel, T. F.: Unexpected significance of a minor reaction pathway in daytime formation of biogenic highly oxygenated organic compounds, Sci. Adv., 8, eabp8702,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp8702" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.abp8702</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Wu, F., Hu, B., Tang, G., Zhang, J., and Wang, Y.: VOC characteristics, emissions and contributions to SOA formation during hazy episodes, Atmos. Environ., 141, 560–570,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Tajuelo, M., Rodríguez, D., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Díaz-de-Mera, Y., Aranda, A., and Rodríguez, A.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from styrene photolysis and photooxidation with hydroxyl radicals, Chemosphere, 231, 276–286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.136" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.136</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Tajuelo, M., Rodríguez, A., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Aranda, A., Díaz-de-Mera, Y., and Rodríguez, D.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-methylstyrene atmospheric degradation: Role of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> level, relative humidity and inorganic seed aerosol, Atmos. Res., 230, 104631–104640, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104631" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104631</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Tajuelo, M., Bravo, I., Rodríguez, A., Aranda, A., Díaz-de-Mera, Y., and Rodríguez, D.: Atmospheric sink of styrene, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-methylstyrene, trans-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-methylstyrene and indene: Rate constants and mechanisms of Cl atom-initiated degradation, Atmos. Environ., 200, 78–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.059</ext-link>, 2019c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Vereecken, L., Glowacki, D. R., and Pilling, M. J.: Theoretical chemical kinetics in tropospheric chemistry: methodologies and applications, Chem. Rev., 115, 4063–4114,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500488p" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr500488p</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Wang, H., Ji, Y., Gao, Y., Li, G., and An, T.: Theoretical model on the formation possibility of secondary organic aerosol from OH initialed oxidation reaction of styrene in the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Environ., 101, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.042" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.042</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Wang, L., Wu, R., and Xu, C.: Atmospheric oxidation mechanism of benzene. Fates of alkoxy radical intermediates and revised mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 14163–14168,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4101762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp4101762</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Wang, M., Chen, D., Xiao, M., Ye, Q., Stolzenburg, D., Hofbauer, V., Ye, P., Vogel, A. L., Mauldin, R. L., Amorim, A., Baccarini, A., Baumgartner, B., Brilke, S., Dada, L., Dias, A., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller, H., Garmash, O., He, X. C., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kvashnin, A., Lehtipalo, K., Fischer, L., Molteni, U., Petäjä, T., Pospisilova, V., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M., Simon, M., Tauber, C., Tomé, A., Wagner, A. C., Weitz, L., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Kirkby, J., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., El-Haddad, I., and Donahue, N. M.: Photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons produces low-volatility organic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7911–7921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c02100</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S. and Li, H.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-initiated gas-phase formation of nitrated phenolic compounds in polluted atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 2899–2907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c08041</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Wu, R., Berndt, T., Ehn, M., and Wang, L.: Formation of highly oxidized radicals and multifunctional products from the atmospheric oxidation of alkylbenzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 8442–8449,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.7b02374</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Wang, S., Newland, M. J., Deng, W., Rickard, A. R., Hamilton, J. F., Muñoz, A., Ródenas, M., Vázquez, M. M., Wang, L., and Wang, X.: Aromatic photo-oxidation, a new source of atmospheric acidity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7798–7806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00526" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c00526</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Wu, R., Pan, S., Li, Y., and Wang, L.: Atmospheric oxidation mechanism of toluene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 4533–4547,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500077f" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp500077f</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Wu, X., Huang, C., Niu, S., and Zhang, F.: New theoretical insights into the reaction kinetics of toluene and hydroxyl radicals, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 22, 22279–22288,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP02984J" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/D0CP02984J</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Wu, X., Hou, Q., Huang, J., Chai, J., and Zhang, F.: Exploring the OH-initiated reactions of styrene in the atmosphere and the role of van der Waals complex, Chemosphere, 282, 131004–131012,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131004</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Xu, C. and Wang, L.: Atmospheric oxidation mechanism of phenol initiated by OH radical, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 2358–2364,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp308856b" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp308856b</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Møller, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Wennberg, P. O.: New insights into the radical chemistry and product distribution in the OH-initiated oxidation of benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13467–13477, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04780" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.0c04780</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Yan, Y., Cabrera-Perez, D., Lin, J., Pozzer, A., Hu, L., Millet, D. B., Porter, W. C., and Lelieveld, J.: Global tropospheric effects of aromatic chemistry with the SAPRC-11 mechanism implemented in GEOS-Chem version 9-02, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 111–130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-111-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-111-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Yang, F., Deng, F., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Tang, C., and Huang, Z.: Kinetics of hydrogen abstraction and addition reactions of 3-hexene by OH radicals, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1877–1889,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11499" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11499</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Yu, S., Jia, L., Xu, Y., and Pan, Y.: Formation of extremely low-volatility organic compounds from styrene ozonolysis: Implication for nucleation, Chemosphere, 305, 135459–135467,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135459" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135459</ext-link>, 2022a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Yu, S., Jia, L., Xu, Y., and Pan, Y.: Molecular composition of secondary organic aerosol from styrene under different <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mtext mathvariant="italic">x</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and humidity conditions, Atmos. Res., 266, 105950–10604, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105950" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105950</ext-link>, 2022b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Zaytsev, A., Koss, A. R., Breitenlechner, M., Krechmer, J. E., Nihill, K. J., Lim, C. Y., Rowe, J. C., Cox, J. L., Moss, J., Roscioli, J. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Kroll, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Mechanistic study of the formation of ring-retaining and ring-opening products from the oxidation of aromatic compounds under urban atmospheric conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15117–15129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, H., Wang, J., Dong, B., Xu, F., Liu, H., Zhang, Q., Zong, W., and Shi, X.: New mechanism for the participation of aromatic oxidation products in atmospheric nucleation, Sci. Total Environ., 917, 170487–170494,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170487" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170487</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, R. M., Truhlar, D. G., and Xu, X.: Kinetics of the toluene reaction with OH radical, Research, 2019, 5373785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/5373785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.34133/2019/5373785</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Q., Li, Y., and Huang, Z.: A theoretical study of H-abstractions of benzaldehyde by H, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">P</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, OH, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radicals: Ab initio rate coefficients and their uncertainty quantification, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 7523–7533, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c02384" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.2c02384</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, Y. and Truhlar, D. G.: The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals, Theor. Chem. Acc., 120, 215–241,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Mechanistic investigations of the formation of multifunctional products from the multi-generation <span class="Radical">⚫</span>OH oxidation of styrene</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Alecu, I. M., Zheng, J., Zhao, Y., and Truhlar, D. G.: Computational thermochemistry: scale factor databases and scale factors for vibrational frequencies obtained from electronic model chemistries, J. Chem. Theory Comput., 6, 2872–2887, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100326h" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100326h</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
       Arathala, P. and Musah, R. A.: Atmospheric chemistry of chloroprene initiated by OH radicals: combined Ab initio/DFT calculations and kinetics analysis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 128, 8983–8995,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c05428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.4c05428</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
       Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
       Bianchi, F., Kurtén, T., Riva, M., Mohr, C., Rissanen, M. P., Roldin, P., Berndt, T., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J., Junninen, H., Jokinen, T., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Thornton, J. A., Donahue, N., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Ehn, M.: Highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOM) from gas-phase autoxidation involving peroxy radicals: a key contributor to atmospheric aerosol, Chem. Rev., 119, 3472–3509, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
       Bloss, C., Wagner, V., Jenkin, M. E., Volkamer, R., Bloss, W. J., Lee, J. D., Heard, D. E., Wirtz, K., Martin-Reviejo, M., Rea, G., Wenger, J. C., and Pilling, M. J.: Development of a detailed chemical mechanism (MCMv3.1) for the atmospheric oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 641–664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-641-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-641-2005</a>, 2005. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
       Boyd, A. A., Flaud, P. M., Daugey, N., and Lesclaux, R.: Rate constants for RO<sub>2</sub>&thinsp;+&thinsp;HO<sub>2</sub> reactions measured under a large excess of HO<sub>2</sub>, J. Phys. Chem. A, 107, 818–821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026581r" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp026581r</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
       Cabrera-Perez, D., Taraborrelli, D., Sander, R., and Pozzer, A.: Global atmospheric budget of simple monocyclic aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6931–6947, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6931-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6931-2016</a>, 2016. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
       Canneaux, S., Bohr, F., and Henon, E.: KiSThelP: a program to predict thermodynamic properties and rate constants from quantum chemistry results, J. Comput. Chem., 35, 82–93,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.23470</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
       Chen, L., Huang, Y., Xue, Y., Jia, Z., and Wang, W.: Atmospheric oxidation of 1-butene initiated by OH radical: Implications for ozone and nitrous acid formations, Atmos. Environ., 244, 118010–118021,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118010</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
       Cho, J., Roueintan, M., and Li, Z.: Kinetic and dynamic investigations of OH reaction with styrene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 9460–9470,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp501380j" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp501380j</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
       Donahue, N. M., Kroll, J. H., Pandis, S. N., and Robinson, A. L.: A two-dimensional volatility basis set – Part 2: Diagnostics of organic-aerosol evolution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 615–634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-615-2012</a>, 2012. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
       Eckart, C.: The penetration of a potential barrier by electrons, Phys. Rev., 35, 1303–1309,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.35.1303" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.35.1303</a>, 1930.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
       Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): Clean Air Act: Title I-Air Pollution Prevention and Control. U.S., ISBN: 978-0314835024,  1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
       Fernández-Ramos, A., Ellingson, B. A., Meana-Pañeda, R., Marques, J. M. C., and Truhlar, D. G.: Symmetry numbers and chemical reaction rates, Theor. Chem. Acc., 118, 813–826, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0328-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0328-0</a>, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
       Forstner, H. J. L., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Secondary organic aerosol from the photooxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons: molecular composition, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1345–1358,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es9605376" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es9605376</a>, 1997.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
       Frisch, M. J., Trucks, G. W., Schlegel, H. B., Scuseria, G. E., Robb, M. A., Cheeseman, J. R., Scalmani, G., Barone, V., Petersson, G. A., Nakatsuji, H., Li, X., Caricato, M., Marenich, A. V., Bloino, J., Janesko, B. G., Gomperts, R., Mennucci, B., Hratchian, H. P., Ortiz, J. V., Izmaylov, A. F., Sonnenberg, J. L., Williams-Young, D., Ding, F., Lipparini, F., Egidi, F., Goings, J., Peng, B., Petrone, A., Henderson, T., Ranasinghe, D., Zakrzewski, V. G., Gao, J., Rega, N., Zheng, G., Liang, W., Hada, M., Ehara, M., Toyota, K., Fukuda, R., Hasegawa, J., Ishida, M., Nakajima, T., Honda, Y., Kitao, O., Nakai, H., Vreven, T., Throssell, K., Montgomery, J. A., Peralta, J. J. E., Ogliaro, F., Bearpark, M. J., Heyd, J. J., Brothers, E. N., Kudin, K. N., Staroverov, V. N., Keith, T. A., Kobayashi, R., Normand, J., Raghavachari, K., Rendell, A. P., Burant, J. C., Iyengar, S. S., Tomasi, J., Cossi, M., Millam, J. M., Klene, M., Adamo, C., Cammi, R., Ochterski, J. W., Martin, R. L., Morokuma, K., Farkas, O., Foresman, J. B., and Fox, D. J.: Gaussian 16, Revision B.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford CT, <a href="https://www.gaussian.com" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 June 2025),  2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
       Fu, Z., Xie, H. B., Elm, J., Guo, X., Fu, Z., and Chen, J.: Formation of low-volatile products and unexpected high formaldehyde yield from the atmospheric oxidation of methylsiloxanes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7136–7145,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01090" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01090</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
       Fu, Z., Ma, F., Liu, Y., Yan, C., Huang, D., Chen, J., Elm, J., Li, Y., Ding, A., Pichelstorfer, L., Xie, H. B., Nie, W., Francisco, J. S., and Zhou, P.: An overlooked oxidation mechanism of toluene: computational predictions and experimental validations, Chem. Sci., 14, 13050–13059,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC03638C" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D3SC03638C</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
       Fu, Z., Guo, S., Xie, H. B., Zhou, P., Boy, M., Yao, M., and Hu, M.: A near-explicit reaction mechanism of chlorine-initiated limonene: implications for health risks associated with the concurrent use of cleaning agents and disinfectants, Environ. Sci. Technol., 58, 19762–19773,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04388" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c04388</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
       Fukui, K.: The path of chemical reactions – the IRC approach, Accounts Chem. Res., 14, 363–368,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ar00072a001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ar00072a001</a>, 1981.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
       Garmash, O., Rissanen, M. P., Pullinen, I., Schmitt, S., Kausiala, O., Tillmann, R., Zhao, D., Percival, C., Bannan, T. J., Priestley, M., Hallquist, Å. M., Kleist, E., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Hallquist, M., Berndt, T., McFiggans, G., Wildt, J., Mentel, T. F., and Ehn, M.: Multi-generation OH oxidation as a source for highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 515–537, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-515-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-515-2020</a>, 2020. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
       Gilbert, R. G. and Smith, S. C.: Theory of unimolecular and recombination reactions, Blackwell Scientific, Carlton, Australia,  ISBN: 978-0632027491, 1990.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
       Glowacki, D. R., Liang, C. H., Morley, C., Pilling, M. J., and Robertson, S. H.: MESMER: an open-source master equation solver for multi-energy well reactions, J. Phys. Chem. A, 116, 9545–9560,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3051033" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3051033</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
       Holbrook, K. A., Pilling, M. J., Robertson, S. H., and Robinson, P. J.: Unimolecular reactions, 2nd edn., Wiley, New York, ISBN: 978-0471922681,  1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
       Huang, Y., Su, T., Wang, L., Wang, N., Xue, Y., Dai, W., Lee, S. C., Cao, J., and Ho, S. S. H.: Evaluation and characterization of volatile air toxics indoors in a heavy polluted city of northwestern China in wintertime, Sci. Total Environ., 662, 470–480,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.250</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
       Iuga, C., Galano, A., and Vivier-Bunge, A.: Theoretical investigation of the OH-initiated oxidation of benzaldehyde in the troposphere, Chem. Phys. Chem., 9, 1453–1459,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800144" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800144</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
       Iyer, S., Kumar, A., Savolainen, A., Barua, S., Daub, C., Pichelstorfer, L., Roldin, P., Garmash, O., Seal, P., Kurtén, T., and Rissanen, M.: Molecular rearrangement of bicyclic peroxy radicals is a key route to aerosol from aromatics, Nat. Commun., 14, 4984–4991, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40675-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40675-2</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
       Ji, Y., Zhao, J., Terazono, H., Misawa, K., Levitt, N. P., Li, Y., Lin, Y., Peng, J., Wang, Y., Duan, L., Pan, B., Zhang, F., Feng, X., An, T., Marrero-Ortiz, W., Secrest, J., Zhang, A. L., Shibuya, K., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Reassessing the atmospheric oxidation mechanism of toluene, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 114, 8169–8174,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705463114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1705463114</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
       Koppmann, R.: Volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere, John Wiley &amp; Sons, ISBN: 978-1405131155,  2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, M., Zhang, Q., Zheng, B., Tong, D., Lei, Y., Liu, F., Hong, C., Kang, S., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Bo, Y., Su, H., Cheng, Y., and He, K.: Persistent growth of anthropogenic non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) emissions in China during 1990–2017: drivers, speciation and ozone formation potential, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8897–8913, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8897-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
       Lu, T.: Molclus program, Version 1.9.3., <a href="http://www.keinsci.com/research/molclus.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 21 May 2024), 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
       Ma, F., Guo, X., Xia, D., Xie, H. B., Wang, Y., Elm, J., Chen, J., and Niu, J.: Atmospheric chemistry of allylic radicals from isoprene: a successive cyclization-driven autoxidation mechanism, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 4399–4409,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07925" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07925</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
       Møller, K. H., Otkjær, R. V., Hyttinen, N., Kurtén, T., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: Cost-effective implementation of multiconformer transition state theory for peroxy radical hydrogen shift reactions, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120, 10072–10087, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09370" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b09370</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
       Møller, K. H., Berndt, T., and Kjaergaard, H. G.: Atmospheric autoxidation of amines, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 11087–11099, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03937" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c03937</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
       Molteni, U., Bianchi, F., Klein, F., El Haddad, I., Frege, C., Rossi, M. J., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1909–1921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018</a>, 2018. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
       Neese, F.: Software update: the ORCA program system – version 6.0, Wires Comput. Mol. Sci., 15, e70019,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.70019</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
       Nie, W., Yan, C., Huang, D. D., Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Qiao, X., Guo, Y., Tian, L., Zheng, P., Xu, Z., Li, Y., Xu, Z., Qi, X., Sun, P., Wang, J., Zheng, F., Li, X., Yin, R., Dallenbach, K. R., Bianchi, F., Petäjä, T., Zhang, Y., Wang, M., Schervish, M., Wang, S., Qiao, L., Wang, Q., Zhou, M., Wang, H., Yu, C., Yao, D., Guo, H., Ye, P., Lee, S., Li, Y. J., Liu, Y., Chi, X., Kerminen, V. M., Ehn, M., Donahue, N. M., Wang, T., Huang, C., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D, Jiang, J., and Ding, A.: Secondary organic aerosol formed by condensing anthropogenic vapours over China's megacities, Nat. Geosci., 15, 255–261, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00922-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-00922-5</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
       Orlando, J. J. and Tyndall, G. S.: Laboratory studies of organic peroxy radical chemistry: an overview with emphasis on recent issues of atmospheric significance, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6294–6317,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35166H" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35166H</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pankow, J. F. and Asher, W. E.: SIMPO L.1: SIMPOL.1: a simple group contribution method for predicting vapor pressures and enthalpies of vaporization of multifunctional organic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2773–2796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2773-2008</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
       Pasik, D., Frandsen, B. N., Meder, M., Iyer, S., Kurtén, T., and Myllys, N.: Gas-phase oxidation of atmospherically relevant unsaturated hydrocarbons by acyl peroxy radicals, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 146, 13427–13437, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c02523" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.4c02523</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
       Sebbar, N., Bozzelli, J. W., and Bockhorn, H.: Thermochemistry and reaction paths in the oxidation reaction of benzoyl radical: C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>5</sub>C⚫( = O), J. Phys. Chem. A, 115, 11897–11914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2078067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2078067</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
       Shen, H., Vereecken, L., Kang, S., Pullinen, I., Fuchs, H., Zhao, D., and Mentel, T. F.: Unexpected significance of a minor reaction pathway in daytime formation of biogenic highly oxygenated organic compounds, Sci. Adv., 8, eabp8702,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp8702" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abp8702</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
       Sun, J., Wu, F., Hu, B., Tang, G., Zhang, J., and Wang, Y.: VOC characteristics, emissions and contributions to SOA formation during hazy episodes, Atmos. Environ., 141, 560–570,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.06.060</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
       Tajuelo, M., Rodríguez, D., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Díaz-de-Mera, Y., Aranda, A., and Rodríguez, A.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from styrene photolysis and photooxidation with hydroxyl radicals, Chemosphere, 231, 276–286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.136" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.136</a>, 2019a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
       Tajuelo, M., Rodríguez, A., Baeza-Romero, M. T., Aranda, A., Díaz-de-Mera, Y., and Rodríguez, D.: Secondary organic aerosol formation from <i>α</i>-methylstyrene atmospheric degradation: Role of NO<sub>x</sub> level, relative humidity and inorganic seed aerosol, Atmos. Res., 230, 104631–104640, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104631" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2019.104631</a>, 2019b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
       Tajuelo, M., Bravo, I., Rodríguez, A., Aranda, A., Díaz-de-Mera, Y., and Rodríguez, D.: Atmospheric sink of styrene, <i>α</i>-methylstyrene, trans-<i>β</i>-methylstyrene and indene: Rate constants and mechanisms of Cl atom-initiated degradation, Atmos. Environ., 200, 78–89, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.059" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.11.059</a>, 2019c.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
       Vereecken, L., Glowacki, D. R., and Pilling, M. J.: Theoretical chemical kinetics in tropospheric chemistry: methodologies and applications, Chem. Rev., 115, 4063–4114,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500488p" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr500488p</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, H., Ji, Y., Gao, Y., Li, G., and An, T.: Theoretical model on the formation possibility of secondary organic aerosol from OH initialed oxidation reaction of styrene in the presence of O<sub>2</sub>∕NO, Atmos. Environ., 101, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.042" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.10.042</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, L., Wu, R., and Xu, C.: Atmospheric oxidation mechanism of benzene. Fates of alkoxy radical intermediates and revised mechanism, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 14163–14168,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4101762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4101762</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, M., Chen, D., Xiao, M., Ye, Q., Stolzenburg, D., Hofbauer, V., Ye, P., Vogel, A. L., Mauldin, R. L., Amorim, A., Baccarini, A., Baumgartner, B., Brilke, S., Dada, L., Dias, A., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller, H., Garmash, O., He, X. C., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kvashnin, A., Lehtipalo, K., Fischer, L., Molteni, U., Petäjä, T., Pospisilova, V., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M., Simon, M., Tauber, C., Tomé, A., Wagner, A. C., Weitz, L., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Kirkby, J., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., El-Haddad, I., and Donahue, N. M.: Photo-oxidation of aromatic hydrocarbons produces low-volatility organic compounds, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7911–7921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c02100</a>, 2020a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, S. and Li, H.: NO<sub>3</sub>-initiated gas-phase formation of nitrated phenolic compounds in polluted atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 2899–2907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c08041</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, S., Wu, R., Berndt, T., Ehn, M., and Wang, L.: Formation of highly oxidized radicals and multifunctional products from the atmospheric oxidation of alkylbenzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 8442–8449,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02374</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, S., Newland, M. J., Deng, W., Rickard, A. R., Hamilton, J. F., Muñoz, A., Ródenas, M., Vázquez, M. M., Wang, L., and Wang, X.: Aromatic photo-oxidation, a new source of atmospheric acidity, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 7798–7806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00526" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00526</a>, 2020b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
       Wu, R., Pan, S., Li, Y., and Wang, L.: Atmospheric oxidation mechanism of toluene, J. Phys. Chem. A, 118, 4533–4547,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500077f" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp500077f</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
       Wu, X., Huang, C., Niu, S., and Zhang, F.: New theoretical insights into the reaction kinetics of toluene and hydroxyl radicals, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 22, 22279–22288,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP02984J" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CP02984J</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
       Wu, X., Hou, Q., Huang, J., Chai, J., and Zhang, F.: Exploring the OH-initiated reactions of styrene in the atmosphere and the role of van der Waals complex, Chemosphere, 282, 131004–131012,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131004</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
       Xu, C. and Wang, L.: Atmospheric oxidation mechanism of phenol initiated by OH radical, J. Phys. Chem. A, 117, 2358–2364,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp308856b" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp308856b</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
       Xu, L., Møller, K. H., Crounse, J. D., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Wennberg, P. O.: New insights into the radical chemistry and product distribution in the OH-initiated oxidation of benzene, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 13467–13477, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04780" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04780</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
       Yan, Y., Cabrera-Perez, D., Lin, J., Pozzer, A., Hu, L., Millet, D. B., Porter, W. C., and Lelieveld, J.: Global tropospheric effects of aromatic chemistry with the SAPRC-11 mechanism implemented in GEOS-Chem version 9-02, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 111–130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-111-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-111-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
       Yang, F., Deng, F., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Tang, C., and Huang, Z.: Kinetics of hydrogen abstraction and addition reactions of 3-hexene by OH radicals, J. Phys. Chem. A, 121, 1877–1889,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11499" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b11499</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
       Yu, S., Jia, L., Xu, Y., and Pan, Y.: Formation of extremely low-volatility organic compounds from styrene ozonolysis: Implication for nucleation, Chemosphere, 305, 135459–135467,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135459" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135459</a>, 2022a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
       Yu, S., Jia, L., Xu, Y., and Pan, Y.: Molecular composition of secondary organic aerosol from styrene under different NO<sub>x</sub> and humidity conditions, Atmos. Res., 266, 105950–10604, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105950" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105950</a>, 2022b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
       Zaytsev, A., Koss, A. R., Breitenlechner, M., Krechmer, J. E., Nihill, K. J., Lim, C. Y., Rowe, J. C., Cox, J. L., Moss, J., Roscioli, J. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Kroll, J. H., and Keutsch, F. N.: Mechanistic study of the formation of ring-retaining and ring-opening products from the oxidation of aromatic compounds under urban atmospheric conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 15117–15129, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15117-2019</a>, 2019. 
    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhang, H., Wang, J., Dong, B., Xu, F., Liu, H., Zhang, Q., Zong, W., and Shi, X.: New mechanism for the participation of aromatic oxidation products in atmospheric nucleation, Sci. Total Environ., 917, 170487–170494,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170487" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170487</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, R. M., Truhlar, D. G., and Xu, X.: Kinetics of the toluene reaction with OH radical, Research, 2019, 5373785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/5373785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.34133/2019/5373785</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, H., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Q., Li, Y., and Huang, Z.: A theoretical study of H-abstractions of benzaldehyde by H, O<sup>3</sup>(P), <sup>3</sup>O<sub>2</sub>, OH, HO<sub>2</sub>, and CH<sub>3</sub> radicals: Ab initio rate coefficients and their uncertainty quantification, J. Phys. Chem. A, 126, 7523–7533, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c02384" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c02384</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
       Zhao, Y. and Truhlar, D. G.: The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions, excited states, and transition elements: two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06-class functionals and 12 other functionals, Theor. Chem. Acc., 120, 215–241,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
